10.2.0.4 Patch for Linux 64 bits for Oracle 64 Bits on RH 5.2

Hi,
Can some one guide me to get the patch for 10.2.0.4 for Oracle 64 bits on Linux RH 5.2 64 bits please!!
thanks

Hi,
the patch URL you can get from:
http://www.oratoolkit.ch/download/
but the thing is that you need to be an oracle customer with a valid customer support id (CSI) to download it. Without CSI there is no chance to get the patch.
Cheers,
David
OCP 9i / 10g
http://www.oratoolkit.ch/knowledge/howto/installation/otn.php

Similar Messages

Transparent Gateway to MS SQL Server for Linux x86-64 ( Oracle 10.2.0.4 ) ?

where can i download tg4msql ?

Hi
I need oracle Tranparent Gateway for Microsoft Sqlserver (tg4msql) for oracle 10g on linux x86-64 bit. I have searched for it on otn.oracle.com and on edelivery.oracle.com. But couldn't find it.
Can any one help me in this regard.
Regards
Nadir.

LabVIEW for Linux, Drivers for DAQCard 500 & DAQCard-AO-2DC

I can't seem to find the drivers on the web site. If they are not yet available, when can I get them? Thank you, Harry

Harry,
National Instruments currently does not provide any linux drivers for its daq devices. You can get all the related info you need about labview, daq and linux from http://www.ni.com/linux/.
Check this site out and it'll lead you to the Comedi project website from where you may be able to get open-source drivers for some of NI's data acquistion products.
Regards,
Afreen S.
www.ni.com/ask

SOA Suite for Linux 64 bit

I had been using a Oracle Application Server 10g Release 3 (10.1.3) Media Pack for Linux x86 (32-bit). We are now moving to a 64-bit Linux. I cannot find a Oracle Application Server 10g Release 3 (10.1.3) Media Pack for Linux x86 for 64-bit Linux. Is it supported on 64 bit.
Also, can an Oracle Enterprise Linux be used instead of RHEL ?
Cheers,
Arun Ramesh

I thought most X64 architectures can support 32 bit apps. Even if the SOA Suite runs in 64 Bit, the JVM will alone be running in 32 Bit. So there should not any compatibility problems.
Is that right?

OAS 4 for Linux?

Hi
Does anyone know if OAS4 is going to be released for
Linux in a reasonable amout of time? WAS3 is surely
a good start, but the limitation for JDK 1.0.2 in the
java cartridge is a heavy one...
Sam Jordan
null

I see many people complaining about OWAS Performance.
I don't know the exact reason but my OWAS installation is
really faster than an NT BOX (at least the PL/SQL Cartridge).
I'm connecting to Oracle8.0.4 EE on RS/6000 with AIX 4.3.
It's just perfect.
Probably some stupid problem with libraries...
Cheers,
Michael Daskaloff
P.S. To development team:
Thanks for the good job, and keep working on the Enterprise
Edition.
Yeah!
Michael H. Thomas (guest) wrote:
: Hi,
: >>Jim (guest) wrote:
: >>: You got that right. That is why I wrote all of my stuff
in
: >>: PL/SQL.
: (Note: Too bad if you did this for OWAS 3.0.2 for LINUX).
: When running PL/SQL code using OWAS 3.0.2 for LINUX there
: is a lag of up to 10 seconds in the listener response to the
: browser client. If you doubt this, please demonstrate your
: performance experiences with OWAS 3.0.2 on LINUX, and I'll
: post my test cases showing the lag.
: Oracle has (to my knowledge, in my opinion) never
'acknowledged'
: a performance lag issue with OWAS 3.0.2 as either a bug, or
: even a performance problem. But, hopefully they are working
: on this issue and will post a patch like they did for the
: 8.0.5 LINUX database:
: ftp://oracle-
: ftp.oracle.com/server/patch_sets/LINUX/80patchsets/80510/
: Therefore, in addition to the Java concerns, we would like
: to see upgrade to OAS 4.0.7 for LINUX just for our PL/SQL
: cartridge code.
: Regards,
: Mike Thomas
null

Photoshop for Linux OS?

I recently switched to Linux and have yet fully figured out if I can use photoshop in some way, shape or form...I appreciate the help!!

Hi Chris,
I was looking at some old threads on the 'PS on Linux' conversations.   I know some are old threads (years old) and you likely had enough of it but always wanted someone at Adobe to hear my cries. 8)
- PS was ported to IRIX back in the day, it was the second platform I used it on (mac being the first) - while I could be wrong I suspect you would sell more licenses for linux than for all the SGI ones ever sold,   in your first year of offering it on linux.    I know they don't exist today and that was a long time ago - Adobe was a smaller company back then and was likely more nimble.
- PS is done in C+, a port would be fairly "easy".
- I am willing to bet a linux port within Adobe already exists, as a result of an official mandate or skunkworks project. I worked at a few large software companies (Alias/Autodesk) and know this is how some ports of projects start their existence, as internal skunkwork efforts.
- A few years ago you said its too complex to offer on linux as the landscape isn't settled (which is still the case).   At Alias we ported a few of our products such as Maya in the 90's, to both linux and windows, I suspect Maya has more lines of code and is more complex than PS.   What we did to address the 'linux fragmentation' issue as many other vendors do who offer ports, is state the system OS/Distro requirements.    Many list / standardize on RHEL as an example.   If you are not using that, you are not using a supported configuration - support is off the hook (unless its Ford or a similar sized client calling you).
- effort vs cost. An interesting thing here is the amount of effort it took for the ports we did.     2 guys in the Seattle office ported the IRIX code base of Maya to Windows in 2 weeks during their off time!   Every company/project is different, i understand it may not be the same at Adobe.
- another comment you may of made was 'linux users don't typically buy software'.   I think things have changed here.   I can say from my personal experience working in M&E studios for the last 15 years or so that Adobe would of had purchase orders for a few hundred linux cuts.   That is from 2 or 3 studios here in Town that I've been at.   How many cuts does Adobe have to think they need to be able to sell before the effort gets traction?    In 3 studios there was an effort made to roll the desk tops over to linux, and its always the same road block which prevents many from doing so, Adobe Photoshop.   Its used in almost every department so it makes it extremely difficult to move off of windows or mac.   Every one of these studios would be more than happy buying PS for linux post roll over. If these 3 studios in town here would be good to buy 40-100 cuts each, we are only 3 of hundreds or thousands of studios out there..   The first release may not sell a bunch as it would take people time to realize the final road block has been removed, and plan for a migration, which typically have to be scheduled weeks/months in advance due to project schedules. But i'm sure with each quarter, sales would continue to climb.     Aside from all that we spend _hundreds of thousands_ of dollars on licenses for products which will run on linux.    the industry spends money.
- I ended up here on this page as yet again I find myself at yet another studio who wants to move off of windows to linux for the desktop, and we are seeing how/if the landscape has changed related to the Photoshop challenge.    Perhaps its the M&E bubble i'm stuck in that makes be believe there is lots of potential for PS on linux - but man, everyone i've talked to in the industry (from ILM, Disney, Wetta, Arc and many others) for the last decade or so has always maintained a desire to see PS released on linux.
- I wonder who these surveys you state which indicated there is little opportunity are being completed by or what the target audience is. I've been in a management role for years and have never been asked by Adobe or anyone for that matter if I would like to see Photoshop ported, or any 'survey' related to Adobe for that matter.   Who is being asked?    There is a forum named "Studio SysAdmins", if one were to go to that list and prompt the question and I assure you, you would have several hundred purchase commitments. That forum is dedicated to people in M&E and many of them are chomping at the bit to migrate off of windows, yet the common show stopper continues to be Photoshop - for the last decade or so.
- Most of the open source flag wavers who state they won't buy commercial software are likely still stuck in their basements or just don't get it.   A company who is out to make a profit will use the proper tools to achieve that goal, regardless if that tool is a commercial one.    some PFY in the tech department refusing to use PS because there is a cost associated to it would/should be turfed.   Some of the people piping up here probably have no decision making role, but unfortunately they tend to be the most vocal.
- If Autodesk can do it, Adobe can too!
- I'm being forced to consider some sort of remote to the desktop photoshop solution. its going to cost us more per workstation to use PS than the product itself. We have never had any luck using PS under emulation, such as Wine.   it "works" but has many issues and i've never seen an Artist accept it.    Wine is not an option for most professional applications I suspect.
- Adobe is out to make money, they have lots of money. I'm sure they could afford to test the waters without going under or pissing off the share holders.   There is always a budget for projects when times are good.
- conspiratorial theories aside - M$ has been known (many times) to 'influence' vendors in ways which are attempts to maintain M$'s market share. They have been brought to court many times for related issues.   Apple not so much, as far as I know.   I mention this its not a far leap to make when someone says "M$ has a deal with Adobe".     Personally I don't think this is the case in this particular situation but its plausible. Stranger deals have happened at the executive level in many companies.
thanks for your time,
take care,
g

Unable to set focus for Linux / X-Windows ($$$ for fix...)

It appears whenever a modal window is opened on Linux X-Windows the focus is stolen from the window and you CANNOT use the keyboard to return to the form - let alone set the focus on the textbox.
This is not just for my modal forms but for something as fundamental as JOptionPane or simple code like this:
JFileChooser chooser = new JFileChooser();
if (chooser.showOpenDialog(parentComponent) == JFileChooser.APPROVE_OPTION) {
From trolling through posts I can see no answers which is really sad for Linux good for Microsoft I guess. How can we deploy on Linux if you are forced to get carpal tunnel clicking on every form with the mouse ?
I would be willing to pay some consulting dollars to get this resolved.
Greg

Hm, I've developed quite a bit for X11 and linux, but I never noticed that effect. Can you post a SSCCE that reproduces the issue, just to be sure it is not a side-effect from your code?
It this is a persistent problem, you might want to make your dialog re-request the focus programmatically:
myDialog.setVisible(true);
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run(){
myDialog.requestFocus();
}See if this does anything. If not, the problem is most likely not coming from swing.

There is a version for Linux Debian Labview 2011?

Hello ...
I am developing a remote service and one of the objectives is that this database is a server with Debian operating system, I searched the LabView 2011 for Debian GNU / Linux and have not found it, if anyone knows? Also of LabVIEW Datalogging and Supervisory Control also for this operating system?
Or any way I can develop my service in windows and then perform a type of application that runs very well considering my database with this server?
Thank you very much and see you soon

I have not tried Labview for Linux on Debian (You really need to mention the version). You could try it and see if it works. Note, Labview for Linux only runs 32 bit. The compatibility issue is highly dependen on your 32 bit library.
Even though NI keep saying they are going to support Linux more, I notice they keep saying it for years but heir support is not very good.
I suggest you do a client server relationship. You could install a client software on Windows (you did not mention the type of data base to be used, files, postgres, mysql, hadoop, etc). The client support for windows is dependent on your client support.
Another alternative is to use Network Shared variables. You can host it on the Windows machine and use tcp/ip to fetch the data directly from the windows machine. There are many choices. The information you provide is mininal at best.

Oracle 10g R2 for Linux ubuntu

Hi,
is it possible to install Oracle 10g R2 on Linux ubuntu ?
If yes :
from here :
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/enterprise-edition/downloads/index.html
which one
Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Linux x86
Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Linux x86-64
Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Linux Itanium
Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Linux on Power
Many thanks.

Please note that this is 10g, and the UI has no support for Ubuntu/Debian.
To get 10g to install, you need to create the file /etc/redhat-release, and put some redhat-string in there...
oracle@c-3po:~$ uname -a
Linux c-3po 2.6.28.8 #2 SMP Tue Mar 17 13:03:16 CET 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
oracle@c-3po:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
5.0.4
oracle@c-3po:~$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 3.1 (drupal)
oracle@c-3po:~$ cat /etc/issue
Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 \n \l
oracle@c-3po:~$ sqlplus / as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Nov 29 12:59:40 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Version, you probably want one of these,
Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Linux x86
Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Linux x86-64
depending on if you have a 32- or 64-bit version of Ubuntu installed...

Oracle 8i is coming for Linux July 5!!!

Okay so they now have a release date for Linux version of Oracle
8i. Its July 5!!!!!!!!!!! Yippeee.
I request that we all go to the corners of our rooms and stand
there in silence for 20 minutes, in observance of this historical
event!
Mubashir
null

We just have to wait - time will come... ;-(
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by LinuxGuy:
Download are has a Oracle 8i EE Release 2
available for Solaris and NT but not for
Linux.
Why?
Oracle is disappointing alot of Linux folks.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Developer for Linux?

is there Developer 2000 V6 for linux
espescially for RedHat 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 7.0 and 7.1??

You must use 6iServer whith f60genm and f60desm to upgrade your Developper 2000 programs for Oracle 8i on red hat 6.x

What are the features of Mozilla Firefox for Linux?

I found an article on the features of Desktop Firefox. Do Linux and Windows have the same features?
If not, I need to know the features for Linux.

Firefox for Windows, Mac OSX (10.6+) and Linux (from mozilla.org) are pretty much the same.
You may find some of the Menu's and KB shortcuts being a little different on the three OS's due to their OS Human Interface Guidelines (HIG) being followed. Also may have some little appearance differences.
For example Tools->Options on Windows is Firefox->Preferences on Mac and Edit->Preferences on Linux.
Adobe is kind of screwing Linux users with Flash by only supporting Flash 11.2 with security updates.

Oracle 8i for Linux shipping date

I want it so bad I can taste it!
Does anybody have any shipping dates for Linux version of
Oracle 8i?
Thanks.
I know they said end of June, well this is almost end
of June. :)
Mubashir
null

Direct from my rep:
I forgot to add my Linux research in my prior note. 8i on
Linux is due July 5th. Don't know if that means we'll be able to
get a CD shipped by then; more likely discs hit Oracle
Manufacturing a couple weeks later.
Mubashir (guest) wrote:
: I want it so bad I can taste it!
: Does anybody have any shipping dates for Linux version of
: Oracle 8i?
: Thanks.
: I know they said end of June, well this is almost end
: of June. :)
: Mubashir
null

FORM 6I FOR WIN 98 & 9IAS FOR LINUX

DEAR SIR/MADAM,
IF I DEVELOP FORMS ON
WIN98 PLATFORM. THEN UPLOAD OFORMS OBJECT TO 9IAS ENTERPRISE EDITION FOR LINUX SERVER FOR DEPLOY APLLICATION ON WEB. PLS ANSWER ME THIS
ACCEPT OR NOT ?
BEST REGARDS
BILLY LEE
null

Hi,
Yes, that's part of the way to do it.
After uploading the binary file (.FMB) which is platform independent, you have to generate the (.FMX) in Linux, as the .FMX are platform specific.

ITunes for Linux or other fully compatible iPod Nano 3rd generation softwaL

When is the release of iTunes for Linux planned for? Is there any fully compatible Linux software with iPod nano 3rd generation?
Thanks for the reply.

The word hacking is very much a positive term. The following links may be helpful in understanding the term better
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker%28computing%29#Hacker_definitioncontroversy
http://books.google.com/books?id=C0Z30r8qdpcC&pg=PA20&lpg=PA20&dq=someonewho+makes+furniture+with+anaxe&source=web&ots=kwUER8EzH7&sig=qjNltAYTTfvTRUPwYrkrPZqeXzA
rgds

JDBC Drivers for Linux

How come Oracle's web site only has downloads for NT and Solaris. Where do I get the latest JDBC driver for Linux?

You should be able to use clases111.zip from AIX or NT with your
Linux client, just copy the file, and add it to your CLASSPATH.
I'm using classes111.zip from AIX (8.1.5) on NT and Win95
clients.
This will work for the thin client, the oci8 needs SQL*Net
(and some more support libs.) installed to work
Hilsen Jan
Greg Patrick (guest) wrote:
: Well that's no good! I don't have the database client
: for Linux. Our 8.0.5 DB is on AIX. We have Windows NT
: 8.0.5 client CD's. I shouldn't need an entire 8.0.5
: Linux client installation just to use JDBC, should I?
: JDBC drivers are available for download for NT and Solaris,
: why not Linux?
: John Salvo (guest) wrote:
: : They are included with the 8 and 8i installations.
: : Greg Patrick (guest) wrote:
: : : I can't find any JDBC drivers for Linux on the Oracle
: Technet
: : : site... It seems very strange that Oracle would have an
: : : 8i database for Linux but not have JDBC drivers. Is this
: true?
: : : All I want is for a java program on a Linux machine to be
: : : able to use the OCI drivers to talk to the database on
: another
: : : machine. Even JDBC thin drivers would be better than
: nothing.
: : : Where are they?
: : : Thanks,
: : : Greg Patrick
: : : http://www.abe.com
null

10.2.0.4 Patch for Linux 64 bits for Oracle 64 Bits on RH 5.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for