1KEK execution: document value is not splitting

Dear All,
I have to prepare the balance sheet profit center wise. I am running 1) F.5D and 2) 1KEK.
But I am not finding the splitted value between two profit centers for vendors & customers in report KE5Z.
In report KE5Z, I dont find the GL payables and receivables. It shows the report only on Vendors and Customers.
Am I following correct process? Or process something else.
Please reply urgently. I am facing this issue on client site.
Thanks,
Regards,
Shailendra.

Solved.
parameter which is imporing into that BADI, i just move those values to export parameter.

Similar Messages

To split the payment document value as per the line items of the P O

To split the payment document value as per the line items of the purchase order in the period of payment, so that the payment amounts are measured against the Capex order assigned as account assignment in the purchase order.(Account assignment tab for the individual line item in the PO.
Example:
Inputs:
Purchase Order 3100012345, line item 10 value 6000 line item 20 value 4000
VAT @10% , account assignment for PO line item 10(Internal Order no 10001) & line item 20 Internal Order 10002) G/ R no 5105105101 for Rs10,000.
The I/R doc 501501501 appears as follows: (MIRO)
Line 10: Value      Rs   6,000
        20: Value      Rs   4,000
VAT                        Rs      600
                       Rs      400
Total                       Rs11, 000
Withholding Tax Rs 1,100
The accounting entry for MIRO happens as follows: doc 2102102101
GR/IR Dr      Rs 10,000
VAT      Dr     Rs   1.000
Vendor    Cr           Rs9, 900
TDS due   Cr          Rs1, 100
The business expects the payment report as follows:payment doc 2001200101
PO     Line item      Internal Order MIRO        Invoice                       Payment       Payment period Amount
                                                                                A/c doc number        doc number
3400012345     10     10001           5605605601 2102102101           2001200101       001/2009           5940
3400012345     20     10002     5605605601     2102102101           2001200101        001/2009          3960
Currently we are able to show the amounts as Rs 6000 for line item 10 & Rs 4000 for line item 20.
The problems faced.
1.     The VAT line items are auto created, hence the reference of purchase order number and line item are not available. So the VAT portion which is part of payment liability does not get reflected against the PO.(not able to show the VAT portion , when we try to show the payment amount per PO line item.)
2.     The withholding tax is also a problem; WHT is not calculated and assigned per line item. It is calculated on the total amount of basic and VAT. Because of these reasons, the payment could not be shown properly according to the line item of the purchase order.
3.     When part payment is made, against invoices, there is no provision to assign a payment amount against a particular line item. Further, when final payment is made in different period, the clearing document will get generated. That adds to the complexity of differentiating full payments and part payments final clearing.
4.     When residual payment is made, a new line item is created. Here assignment of Purchase order line item against payment for residual items become a problem.
5.     Many a times advance payments are made. Later the invoice is created and balance payment is made. In those situations, the clearing document creates one more line item and makes payment for the balance item. This adds complexity in bringing balance payment alone and to split as per the purchase order line item. The clearing document number system is multi dimensional. It creates two line items for the same item (one at the time of advance and another the time of clearing.)
6.     When full payment is made, the payment document number and clearing document numbers are same. In cases of subsequent or partial or residual payment, the document numbers are different. Because of this, the part payment amounts are shown in the period, where the final payment and clearing are made.
Please suggest a way to split the payment amount in the exact posting period with all the considerations given above.
Regards
Sundararajan
Edited by: Sundarajan Venkatachari on Sep 30, 2009 11:04 AM

Hi,
See Note 301077 - User exits for the interface to accounting, although I think that there isn't this kind of option. Note 429117 - Collective note advice note SD-FI interface will be useful too.
I think that SAP Note 1085921 - Document split perhaps will help you
Regards
Eduardo

I get the following message when i try to open ALL my documents : frozen panes and split panes are not supported and were removed. my documents are blank

i get the following message when i try to open any of my documents : frozen panes and split panes are not supported and were removed. All my documents open blanc!

Hi Louisa,
louisa_16_za wrote:
i work with Numbers on my MiniMac and then save the files as Excel because the university only works with Windows.
Numbers is not an Excel clone. Importing and exporting between Numbers and Excel will eventually build up glitches.
If the university only works with 'Windoze' it might be better if you use Excel or a free version of Office (for example, Libre Office or Open Office).
If your marks depend upon a professor who uses Excel, go with the flow.
http://www.howtogeek.com/187663/openoffice-vs.-libreoffice-whats-the-difference- and-which-should-you-use/
Regards,
Ian

Condition value is not updating in shipment cost documents.

We are creating a shipment cost document and condition value is not updating automatically when we enter the amount.
Regards,
Jagadeesh

Dears,
The material master of the material is not maintained with gross weight and net weight, hence automatic updation for condition value is not taking place, i resolved the issue.
Thanks,
Jagadeesh

Note 951952 - Incorrect excise values if batch split in MIGO for import PO

Dear participants,
We have applied Note 951952 - Incorrect excise values if batch split in MIGO for import PO,
for following issue,
While doing import goods receipt for batch split quantity,
excise base value is calculating for entire amount not by splitted quantity.
We are unable to solve this issue.
We are using SAP ECC release 6.0 level 11 whether above mentioned note can be applied or else any other
new notes to apply solve this issue.
Advance thanks
Regards,
A.Jeyakanthan

Thanks for reply,will check note is applicable for current package level.
Actually we found excise base value is same for GR of batch split quantities for same material
with valuation type import duty free.

FI-CA Document not splitting

We have activated the document splitting. But when the data gets transfer from IS-U to R/3 said FI document is not splitting.
Document posted within R/3 are getting splitted properly.
Request you to inform if there is any specific setting required / required to define new Document Splitting Rule for document which are applicable for splitting and are being posted from IS-U.

We have enhanced event R999.

Split document function does not work accurately by size

Hello there,
I am using Acrobat Pro 9.4.2
I tried to split a document of about 15 mb size (420 pages) into 5 equal size of documents (3 mb) for sending through mails.
However, I find the generated documents are of different sizes, some are more than 3 mb and some less than 3 mb. I tried splitting by number of pages but some pages have graphics, so again the result is uneven.
Finally, I increased the number of splits and just clubbed about 3 or more files together to manage the 3 mb limit.
The original file have bookmarks but the split documents do not have any.
It has only one top level bookmark so I could not split by bookmarks.
Question is: Is there any way to split the document accurately by size. Additionally, I need to retain the related bookmarks in each split including the inital view of bookmark panel & page.
Thanks for reading this.

Unfortunately, Adobe acknowledged right after they released Acrobat 9 that there is a bug in the File Size option of the Split Document feature and that it would not be fixed until Acrobat X release. (I have not looked at X to see if they have actually fixed it or not)
Despite the fact that they knew there was this problem, they decided to get people to pay for the new version rather than fix their mistake in their version within one of their patches, but rather to force people to pay a few hundred more dollars for a new version. Ick.
The only real solution is to split the documents and then to combine those documents that are not close to what you are seeking. I know, I know. It's lame, and as much as I love using Acrobat products, this philosphy is less than honorable.

Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
1. We need to update records for April- May.
2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
Regards

hi ELI
i have checked the follwoing secnarios
1. funds management deactivated.
2. one document posted with amount10000
3. funds management activated.
4. we have executed FMN0
here no document is selected after execution.
Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
Regards

544 Movement ,Qty & value is not getting updated in MC.9

Dear friends,
MC.9 & MB5b report is showing difference in Qty & Value.In my analysis i came to know that 544 movement is not getting updated in MC.9. I also Checked the Statistically relev. key as 2 and Consumption posting G in OMJJ.
I require the info about MC.9 configuration or any info related to this.

Hi,
Please refer SAP note 581240 for this.
For these stocks you have three valuation types for selection:
' ' = no inventory valuation
'A' valuation = without reference to sales document ('make-to-stock
inventory')
'M' = separate valuation with reference to the sales and distribution
document/project
ONLY stock/stock movements with special stock valuation 'A'
(make-to-stock inventory) are updated in Inventory Controlling.
Thus, if you find a document which is not updated in the info structures
of Inventory Controlling (S031-S039) and you require this, check the
corresponding documents in the materials management tables. You can find
the special stock indicator and indicator of the valuation of the
special stock, for example, in document segment table MSEG in the
following fields:
MSEG-SOBKZ = Special Stock Indicator
MSEG-KZBWS = Indicator: Special Stock Valuation
Only A type (make to stock ) are updated in the info structures.
Hoping this helps.
Regards,
Rajesh.

Values r not fetch in internal table

Hi Frds
In my report the values are not fetching in the internal table ICOSP
This is my program ,kindly correct my mistake.
DATA : WBS LIKE VBAK-PS_PSP_PNR.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK 01.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK 02 WITH FRAME .
SELECT-OPTIONS PROJECT FOR WBS.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK 02.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK 01.
DATA: BEGIN OF IVBAK OCCURS 0,
      VBTYP LIKE VBAK-VBTYP, "SD document category
      AUART LIKE VBAK-AUART, "Sales Document Type
      NETWR LIKE VBAP-NETWR, "NET VALUE OF THE ORDER ITEM
      WAERK LIKE VBAK-WAERK, "SD document currency
      PS_PSP_PNR LIKE VBAP-PS_PSP_PNR, "WBS Element
      END OF IVBAK.
DATA: BEGIN OF IPRPS OCCURS 0,
      PSPNR LIKE PRPS-PSPNR, "WBS Element
      POSID LIKE PRPS-POSID, "WBS Element
      OBJNR LIKE PRPS-OBJNR, "Object number
      PSPHI LIKE PRPS-PSPHI, "Current project number
      END OF IPRPS.
DATA: BEGIN OF ICOSP OCCURS 0,
      OBJNR LIKE COSP-OBJNR,
      GJAHR LIKE COSP-GJAHR,
      WRTTP LIKE COSP-WRTTP,
      BEKNZ LIKE COSP-BEKNZ,
      WTG001 LIKE COSP-WTG001,
      WTG002 LIKE COSP-WTG002,
      WTG003 LIKE COSP-WTG003,
      WTG004 LIKE COSP-WTG004,
      WTG005 LIKE COSP-WTG005,
      WTG006 LIKE COSP-WTG006,
      WTG007 LIKE COSP-WTG007,
      WTG008 LIKE COSP-WTG008,
      WTG009 LIKE COSP-WTG009,
      WTG010 LIKE COSP-WTG010,
      WTG011 LIKE COSP-WTG011,
      WTG012 LIKE COSP-WTG012,
      WTG013 LIKE COSP-WTG013,
      WTG014 LIKE COSP-WTG014,
      WTG015 LIKE COSP-WTG015,
      WTG016 LIKE COSP-WTG016,
     SUM TYPE CURRENCY ,
      END OF ICOSP.
*DATA: ICOSP LIKE COSP OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB OCCURS 0,
      PSPNR LIKE VBAK-PS_PSP_PNR,
      NETWR LIKE VBAP-NETWR,
      END OF ITAB.
PERFORM IVBAK.
PERFORM IPRPS.
PERFORM ICOSP.
PERFORM MOVE_COSP.
PERFORM MOVE.
PERFORM FIELDCATALOG.
PERFORM BUILD_LAYOUT.
PERFORM ALVDISPLAY.
FORM IVBAK.
SELECT VBTYP AUART NETWR WAERK PS_PSP_PNR FROM VBAK INTO TABLE IVBAK
       WHERE PS_PSP_PNR IN PROJECT AND
             VBTYP = 'G' AND AUART = 'ZPCQ'.
CLEAR: IVBAK.
ENDFORM.                    "IVBAK
FORM IPRPS.
SELECT PSPNR POSID OBJNR PSPHI FROM PRPS INTO TABLE
         IPRPS WHERE PRPS~PSPHI IN PROJECT.
CLEAR : IPRPS.
ENDFORM.                    "IVBAP
FORM ICOSP.
LOOP AT IPRPS.
SELECT OBJNR GJAHR WRTTP BEKNZ WTG001 WTG002 WTG003 WTG004 WTG005
    WTG006 WTG007 WTG008 WTG009 WTG010 WTG011
    WTG012 WTG013 WTG014 WTG015 WTG016
    FROM COSP INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ICOSP
      WHERE OBJNR = IPRPS-OBJNR AND WRTTP = '4'.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR:ICOSP.
ENDFORM.
Thanks
Pari

hi,
try this Code
DATA : wbs LIKE vbak-ps_psp_pnr.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK 01.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK 02 WITH FRAME .
SELECT-OPTIONS project FOR wbs.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK 02.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK 01.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ivbak,
vbtyp LIKE vbak-vbtyp, "SD document category
auart LIKE vbak-auart, "Sales Document Type
netwr LIKE vbap-netwr, "NET VALUE OF THE ORDER ITEM
waerk LIKE vbak-waerk, "SD document currency
ps_psp_pnr LIKE vbap-ps_psp_pnr, "WBS Element
END OF ivbak.
TYPES: BEGIN OF iprps,
pspnr LIKE prps-pspnr, "WBS Element
posid LIKE prps-posid, "WBS Element
objnr LIKE prps-objnr, "Object number
psphi LIKE prps-psphi, "Current project number
END OF iprps.
TYPES: BEGIN OF icosp,
objnr LIKE cosp-objnr,
gjahr LIKE cosp-gjahr,
wrttp LIKE cosp-wrttp,
beknz LIKE cosp-beknz,
wtg001 LIKE cosp-wtg001,
wtg002 LIKE cosp-wtg002,
wtg003 LIKE cosp-wtg003,
wtg004 LIKE cosp-wtg004,
wtg005 LIKE cosp-wtg005,
wtg006 LIKE cosp-wtg006,
wtg007 LIKE cosp-wtg007,
wtg008 LIKE cosp-wtg008,
wtg009 LIKE cosp-wtg009,
wtg010 LIKE cosp-wtg010,
wtg011 LIKE cosp-wtg011,
wtg012 LIKE cosp-wtg012,
wtg013 LIKE cosp-wtg013,
wtg014 LIKE cosp-wtg014,
wtg015 LIKE cosp-wtg015,
wtg016 LIKE cosp-wtg016,
sum TYPE currency ,
END OF icosp.
*DATA: ICOSP LIKE COSP OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: BEGIN OF itab,
pspnr LIKE vbak-ps_psp_pnr,
netwr LIKE vbap-netwr,
END OF itab.
DATA : i_ivbak TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ivbak,
       i_prps TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF iprps,
       i_icosp TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF icosp,
       wa_ivbak TYPE ivbak,
       wa_prps TYPE prps,
       wa_icosp TYPE icosp.
PERFORM ivbak.
PERFORM iprps.
PERFORM icosp.
*PERFORM MOVE_COSP.
*PERFORM MOVE.
*PERFORM FIELDCATALOG.
*PERFORM BUILD_LAYOUT.
*PERFORM ALVDISPLAY.
FORM ivbak.
SELECT vbtyp auart netwr waerk ps_psp_pnr FROM vbak
INTO TABLE i_ivbak
WHERE ps_psp_pnr IN project AND
vbtyp = 'G' AND auart = 'ZPCQ'.
ENDFORM. "IVBAK
*&      Form IPRPS
*       text
FORM iprps.
SELECT pspnr posid objnr psphi
FROM prps INTO TABLE
i_prps WHERE prps~psphi IN project.
ENDFORM. "IVBAP
*&      Form ICOSP
*       text
FORM icosp.
IF i_prps[] IS NOT INITIAL.
    SELECT objnr gjahr wrttp beknz wtg001 wtg002 wtg003 wtg004 wtg005
    wtg006 wtg007 wtg008 wtg009 wtg010 wtg011
    wtg012 wtg013 wtg014 wtg015 wtg016
    FROM cosp INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_icosp
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_prps
    WHERE objnr = i_prps-objnr AND wrttp = '4'.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    "ICOSP
Regards
Sandipan

Contract Release Value is not updated with Confirmation or Invoice value

The release value for a contract in SRM EBP shows the value of purchase orders created using that contract. It does not take into account confirmation and/or invoice values.
For example I create a PO for 10 items at £100/each using Contract ABC. The total value of the PO is £1000 and the release value contract ABC would be £1000. If I then only confirm and invoice 5 items (£500) for the PO, the release value of contract ABC stays at £1000 even though I would expect it to update to £500
Therefore the release value of the contract could be incorrectly overstated if purchase orders are created against the contract but not actually invoiced/confirmed for their total value.
Please could you confirm the correct functionality and how I could find out the the true invoice value of purchases made using a contract?

Hi
Which SRM and R/3 versions are you using ?
Meanwhile, please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will help in this case ->
Note 622045 Net value in release overview of contract is incorrect
Note 493519 Release quantities are not updated
Note 1108322 BBP_CONTRACT_CHECK wrong calculation of values
Note 1102886 Contracts: Lesser Field length for Target Value
Note 1082548 Check of Released quantity and released value in contract
Note 656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
Note 874920 Currency not allowed to be changed for a 'Released' Contract
Note 703771 Resetting release values during purchase order item deletion
Note 643823 BLAREL: Incorrect values in service segment
Note 519879 BBP_CTR_MAIN: No message when values in Contract are reset
Note 520734 Target value not converted if currency is changed
Note 528897 Documents not displayed in contract release order overview
Note 430373 BBP_CON_MNT: No releases available
Note 491993 Entry of contracts with target values
Note 437491 Purchase contract: Incorrect update of the call-off values
Note 406799 BBP_CON_MNT: Fields after contract release ready for input
Note 398168 Purchase contract: Target value is not changed
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

Hi Experts,
My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
Original invoice document accounting entries:
GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
Vendor account: Credited
during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
Vendor account : Debited
GR/IR Account : Credited
Consumption Account : Credited
Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
but while cancelling the GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
Kindly help in this regards
Regards
Mohan

Hi,
Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
Thanks & Regards,

R/3 ZCOND values are not picked properly in BW

We had a issue in one of the BW Reports. There are three types of discounts offered in the sales, namely Hospital Discount, Market Discount & Pharmacy Discount.
For certain billing document nos, the R/3 and BW values were not matching. However, the Net Amount is matching.
There is a table by the name ZVBW_PRICE_COND which is a view created out of the tables VBRK, VBRP & ZSBW_PRICE_COND.
In R/3, we put the POSNR value (Billing Item) and BELNR value (Billing Doc no.) to generate KNUMV value (Number of Document Condition) and KSCHL values.
In the KONV table, we put the KPOSN (Condition Item no.) = 10, KNUMV value and KSCHL value (Condition Type) to get the Condition value.
The value generated was ok and were same as that of vf03.
Now we checked the Data source 2LIS_13_VDITM and its extract structure.
Here we found Field only in Customer Exit checkbox ticked for ZCOND1 to 4.
However, in BW, there are specific Infoobjects like Condition Value1,2,3,& 4 each of which is directly mapped to ZCOND1,2,3,& 4 respectively.
Hospital Discount and Market Discount are mapped to ZCOND3 & ZCOND2 respectively in the concerned report.
I could have remove the ticks in the checkbox and make ZCOND accesible to extractor. But problem is that it is only certain billing doc nos for which discounts are not matching. Any help will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Surajit

Hi,
This checkbox is set for those fields of the datasource(in rsa6) which are custom fields,and whose values are determined by a user-exit written in tcode CMOD.
We have observed that keeping this checkbox ticked or unticked does not make any difference at all.So even removing this checkbox for your 4 fields will not solve the mismatch issue.
The mapping for the 4 fields in your case,is already there in BW.
Please go to tcode CMOD,enter the BW project name,select components and click on display.4 user exits will be displayed.
1st is for TD datasources,2nd for master data attr,and next are for text and hierarchies.
Double click on 1st exit FM,then double click on the include program,and find the exit code written for your datasource.Most probably user-exit not working OK.
cheers,
Vishvesh

Reports 6i to 10g Migration (Value Does Not Match mask 'MM/DD/YYYY'

Dear all,
I am Migrating Oracle 6i Reports to 10g. I am just compiling the 6i Reports in 10g Reports Builder and giving the
Report for Deployment after it got successfully ran in the report builder.
In one of the Report Report Query i am checking date range like below
WHERE lov_dte BETWEEN :L_FRM_DTE AND :L_TO_DTE
L_FRM_DTE and L_TO_DTE input mask is MM/DD/YYYY
i got the output in report builder and as well as from the application also but after the compiled the same report
in 10g and tested in server ..
i am getting the following error in server ..
REP-546:Value does not match mask 'MM/DD/YYYY'
ORA-01030:Date format picture ends before converting entire input string
REP-0091:Invalid value for parameter L_FRM_DTE
any body faced the same problem ...please help me to resolve this issue ..
I Tried Changing the Query to
WHERE lov_dte BETWEEN to_date(:L_FRM_DTE,'mm/dd/yyyy') AND to_date(:L_TO_DTE,'mm/dd/yyyy')
but still no use because iam getting runtime error ORA-01858 NON NUMERIC CHARACTER WAS FOUND WHERE A NUMERICA CHAR WAS EXPECTED.
Thank you all for Looking into my problem..
Data Boy

Dear all i found the document related to this problem in META LINK ..The Bug no is 5597464
The base of this Bug is 4589885
It is given that
Fixed in Product Version 11.0
but when i go to oracle site ..i cant find this version for Developer suite. can anyone please help in this
there is only Oracle Developer Suite 10g (10.1.2.0.2).
Thank you all for looking into my problem.

Excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order

Hi all,
While capturing excise invoice , the excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order and in Excise Item Tab BED,AED,ECS is Zero at both header as well as item level for only one material in STO process and if we are doing same process taking other material all things are coming perfectly and We are maintaining condition with respect to vendor,plant and material combination.Any input related to this will be helpfull and rewarded.
Regards
Vishal

Hi,
Follow STO Process for this;
1.Create a vendor for the company code of receiving plant, using account group: 0007 using T-Code XK01.
2. Assign this vendor to Delivering plant
Go to XK02 >Purchasing view>Extras>Add. Purchasing data>Plant
3. Create internal customer with the sales area of the vendor. Go To XD01
4. In pricing procedure determination relevant to STO, assign document Pricing Procedure and customer pricing procedure appropriate for STO to get the pricing in the invoice.
5. Maintain condition records for the relevant pricing condition.
6. Some more setting for STO: Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Receiving plant >assign customer here & Supplying SA (for billing) to Receiving plant here
7. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Supplying plant and assign the sales area of receiving plant.
8. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > assign delivery Type & Checking rule
Assign the delivery type to document type. In this case, Delivery type NLCC is assigned to Document type NB
9. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > Assign document Type, One step Procedure, Under delivery tolerance
Assign the document type NB to supplying plant and receiving plant
10. After all settings, Create the STO using T-Code: ME21N and maintain pricing conditions of freight and Save.
11. In supplying plant Maintain condition record in sales using VK11 the same will flow in receiving plant when referring the OBD no during MIGO.
10. Create Delivery: VL10G
12. Picking, PGI: VL02N
13. Billing: VF01
Save the document and its done
14. J1IIN - Outgoing Excise Invoice
15. MIGO - Goods Receipt against outbound Delivery
16. J1IEX - Capture & Post Excise Invoice
Rgs

1KEK execution: document value is not splitting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for