2nd low-cost camera for on-site shoots

I use the Panasonic HVX-200p for my studio work which is almost all green screen and usually shot at 720p30 or 720p60. I capture direct to my workstation using OnLocation CS4 via firewire.
Now I need a 2nd camera to capture on-site, outdoors mostly, but possibly some indoors. End use is educational DVD's and perhaps online courses, probably in H.264, so I don't need broadcast quality.
I need to go cheap on this because of my budget. I have little knowledge, but how about an inexpensive DSLR? My concern with these is that the codec is AVCHD [I think] and I've read about how this strains the PC requirements, is not easily digested (unless that's improved with CS6), etc. (see my Profile for workstation specs). Also, I'm not sure how it would look with the Panasonic keyed footage.
There is another option: carry a laptop with OnLocation CS4 installed and capture with it using the Panasonic. Granted, it is cumbersome and hinders in other ways, but it is possible. This choice, if acceptable, would require me to buy a laptop with a decent battery life (my existing laptop is an older, core 2 duo & the battery died long ago). I'd like to hear opinions on this because I don't know if this option would be cheaper than a new camera and/or give me better quality.
Anyway, I think you get the idea. I am most grateful for all recommendations. I am willing to consider used cameras, if that works.
Paul
P.S. I need at least one wireless microphone.
Message was edited by: Paul Stark

Hi Paul,
Both my cam's are panosonic, and though a little above the one in question in terms of price range, i can give a little feedback on what is similar between them.
Apart from the dreaded AVCHD problems CS5 and early versions of CS6 had, you shouldn't have to much trouble with it.
Both of my cams;
AG-AC130
Panasonic AG-AC130 AVCCAM HD Handheld ... - B&H Photo Video
& AG-AC160
Panasonic AG-AC160 AVCCAM HD Handheld ... - B&H Photo Video
use the dual SDHC cards, apart from making sure you copy the entire card, you will be fine. The file structure has to be completely intact otherwise timecode, audio and spanning clips will get messed up and cause you headaches.
My cam's are extremely good in low light, stomp all over the famed Sony Z7's of yesteryear. As long as your not shooting anything fast moving, if you need the light lower the shutter speed to 1/25 and open the iris right up you will get decent footage in lower light situations.
One thing you won't get in that model is the DRS function which is revolutionary to say the least, in a nutshell it supresses overexposure and boosts shadows.
In addition you'll have to xlr inputs so add wireless, or even a boom mic (much better price to quality ratio) with ease.
The GoPro's are amazing, but in my opinion totally sh*t in low light situations. People will argue that the newer models are much better, but I hate any grain. Another option with your low light requirements would be to add one of these Z96 LED, They are amazing for the size, easy to attach to a hotshoe, dimmable and unbelievably bright. Color temp isn't bad either, can be a bit cold\blue at full kick but has two magnetic diffusers ( i usually just manually change the temp in cam but lower budget cameras don't often have this function). Even doing an Auto WB would help to correct the temp.
Hope this helps you a bit
Troy

Similar Messages

  • Which is the best low-cost camera for my use?

    Hi everyone. Been busy and off the forums for a while, but need your expertise once again.
    I just found out that the Panasonic HVX-200p that's been on loan to me for 2 years has to be returned. Since I run a non-profit, I am thinking about asking my major donors to buy one for us. So, the question becomes which one? I own the CS4 MC, and you can see my other info in my profile.
    I only do educational-type videos in an interview format against a green screen so far. I've been capturing direct to OnLocation via 1394 FireWire at 720p/60fps and editing in an HDV 720p/30 sequence. I sometimes do "man on the street" segments (capturing to OnLocation on laptop). I integrate numerous PSD graphics as educational slides, a lot of AE projects I get from videohive and customize, render, & import into PP, and motion backgrounds like Pond5's weekly free stock footage (much of this stuff gets resized, of course). I do some scoring and some SFX and export the audio to SB for touchup. I use a bunch of Lowes/Home Depot worklamps with fluorescent bulbs for lighting the subject and background. I key my backgrounds using PP/AE Dynamic Link. Oh, and I'll need a lapel mic and a tripod, too. I would prefer not to rule out shooting at 1080i/p at some point.
    I export H.264 highlight clips which get uploaded to Vimeo and embedded in our website using prettyPhoto features. Ultimately, the finished PP project is exported as MPEG2-DVD, finished in Encore, burned via ImgBurn. If you want to see a good example, watch this http://vimeo.com/23346431. Caution: this is religious material. Be sure to repent before watching
    So, there's not really much heavy lifting here. But when it comes to what is the minimum I need with the options of capture formats, etc., I'm clueless. I've read about problems with AVCHD, and although low-cost, is it really a problem for what I do? I trust this forum more than online reviews, and I'd appreciate recommendations of specific models and where to buy, if possible. Also, what about used cameras? Please remember, the budget is tight.
    All suggestions and questions are welcome and very much appreciated.
    Paul

    Actually, two things surprise me in your statement and one is simply incorrect:
    As for Broadcast quality..... a little station called CNN - you might have heard about them bought 250 of them from Panasonic about a year ago.
    First, that CNN would buy JVC cameras not from JVC, but from Panasonic.
    Second, there are no JVC cameras on the BBC approved list at all, see http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/site/BBC_Approved_HD_Cameras.pdf and the only affordable ones on the list in the handheld category are the Canon XF300/305. Maybe that is the reason the BBC bought 350 of these. Even the Sony XDCAM EX is only accepted in combination with a 50 Mb disk drive, not in the native 35 Mb format.
    The BBC approved list is a list that most broadcasters adhere to, including CNN, Discovery, ARD and NGC.
    The JVC GY-HD100U is definitely not acceptable for HD, and in no way HD broadcast ready. But that CNN bought that number of these cameras is probably caused by the fact that they think these deliver better quality than regular phones. And it does not use XDCAM, but a very simple HDV codec, limited to 1280 x 720 resolution. See http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/specs.jsp?model_id=MDL101539&feature_id=03
    This simply means that the Canon codec is very acceptable to the BBC for HD programs. The XF100 uses the same codec, but is only a single sensor camera and for that reason alone not approved by the BBC.
    Paul, if you can live with the limitations of a single sensor camera - and given your intended purposes, I think you can - the JVC does not even come close and the XF100 material will be hardly worse than the XF300/305. To the untrained eye the results are almost the same.

  • Best Low Cost Camcorder for FCP?

    I'm going to take back a Samsung D453 camcorder because it has time code breaks during capture. Does anyone have any recommendations for a low cost DV camcorder that is supported by Final Cut Pro?

    Actually, recording timecode on a tape might have been a good idea with analog crash recording, but it does not make sense on DV camcorders. If nothing else you end up recording twice on the tape which increases wear on the camera heads and doesn't do much for the tape either.
    As an alternative to blacking tapes, simply record the first 30 seconds or so of the tape without images. Use a bars and tone if the camera can generate one. Otherwise use the FCP version. This gives you enough preroll area for capturing all material after this point.
    Once into the tape, just make sure when you stop recording, the heads are in a position that will allow them to pick up the timecode and continue on. As long as you do not rewind and review the footage you are good to go. If you must rewind & review, stop the play back a few seconds short of the end of the previous shot.
    So to recap. Generate bars and tone for the first 30 seconds of the tape then give your self enough preroll on each shot as well as an additional few seconds at the end of each shot.
    If you must review a shot/scene in camera, stop the tape before the end of the scene so the camera can pick up the timecode as it moves on.
    Good luck.
    x

  • Searching for a low-cost plug for doing better slow motion clips.

    Where can I find a low-cost or free plug-in for doing better slow motion clips? I produce alot of sports videos and use FCPHD but am looking for better quality. I am not necessarily looking for time-remapping (it confuses the ** out of me). Just want to simply slow down clips and not be as choppy as FCP turns out.
    Thanks for any help!
    Ymir

    New Discussions ResponsesThe new system for discussions asks that after you mark your question as Answered, you take the time to mark any posts that have aided you with the tag and the post that provided your answer with the tag. This not only gives points to the posters, but points anyone searching for answers to similar problems to the proper posts.
    If we use the forums properly they will work well...
    Patrick

  • Alternative low cost suppliers for LV compatible I/O cards

    I'm looking for a low cost LV compatible card to use in my lab on Windows
    PC's by students, because the original NI cards are not so cheap. Number of
    I/O, resolution and speed is not so important, but it must work properly.I
    don't want to use the "German" solution with a SoundBoard, because its quite
    limited. It must have at least 4 I/O and 8 or 12 bit resolution. Has anayone
    any experimence with other suppliers than National Instruments in Europe?
    Thanks!

    Thanks for the info, i will certainly investigate it next week!
    Marc
    "kevin" schreef in bericht
    news:Y6Y5a.9680$[email protected]..
    > In article <3e57dd24$0$83869$[email protected]>, "Marc Thijs"
    > wrote:
    >
    > > I'm looking for a low cost LV compatible card to use in my lab on
    > > Windows PC's by students, because the original NI cards are not so
    > > cheap. Number of I/O, resolution and speed is not so important, but it
    > > must work properly.I don't want to use the "German" solution with a
    > > SoundBoard, because its quite limited. It must have at least 4 I/O and 8
    > > or 12 bit resolution. Has anayone any experimence with other suppliers
    > > than National Instruments in Europe? Thanks!
    >
    > Check o
    ut my response to this post:
    >
    http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=5
    06500000008000000505B0000&UCATEGORY_0=_49_%24_6_&UCATEGORY_S=0&USEARCHCONTEX
    T_QUESTION_0=Is+it+possible+to+acquire+an+analog+input+without+a+DAQ+board&U
    SEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_S=0
    >
    > Just go to MeasurementComputing.com. I've used these boards for several
    > years now and haven't had many problems. I would strongly suggest the
    > CIO-DAS08/JR for $179(US):
    >
    http://www.measurementcomputing.com/cbicatalog/cbiproduct.asp?dept%5Fid=117&
    pf%5Fid=183&mscssid=N1UUA2JCKE0P9PWU130KXM64XNRX1SS4
    >
    > I'm sure they'll provide you an educator discount. Oh yeah, these guys
    > aren't in Europe so perhaps the added S/H won't make them so cheap...
    >
    > Good luck,
    > -Kevin

  • Can anyone please advise on a low cost printer for the MAC Book Pro with Retina?

    I just changed from a Dell PC laptop with a Dell Printer (Laserjet 1100) and this printer is not compatible or will not work with my Mac book pro. I'm trying to keep the cost down, so I appreciate any recommendations in advance! Thank you!

    I would greatly appreciate any feedback please!!! I thank you in advance!!!

  • Simple and low cost design tool

    I am looking for a simple (relatively) and low cost(or free) tool, site, software that can help with the design of space. Something that essentially can take a space and place objects to help figure out the layout and design.  Any ideas?

    Hi,
    Some companies have budget problems and are having to reduce their cost of operation.
    Have you ever heard of open source tools? They can do the job easily and less expensive than proprietary solutions that cost a lot of money.
    You can have a look at a good ETL open source program called Talend Open Studio: it is user-friendly but also has advanced features intended for technical users (java debugger, code injection…). It can perform data migration and ETL as you wrote in your first post.
    The website is [http://www.talend.com/download.php|http://www.talend.com/download.php] to download the open source program. They have a forum and documentation you can read. Tell us what you think about the software.
    For an ETL benchmark: [http://blogs.sun.com/aja/entry/talend_s_new_data_processing|http://blogs.sun.com/aja/entry/talend_s_new_data_processing]

  • Intel Anti-Theft Technology: Low cost enterprise options

    Working in education, I'm looking for a low cost option for implementing anti-theft tech. All we need is a way to disable stolen computers, in order to deter thieves in the future. We don't expect to recover stolen equipment, so tracking is not needed. Computrace is too expensive. SecureDisable seems like a good option without unnecessary features, but still seems like a lot for a simple service.
    Anybody have any experience in this area?
    Are pay services absolutely required for this tech? What about writing a custom management plug-in?

    Hello,
    Two thoughts:
    Check with your existing vendor(s) of security software to see if they offer an anti-theft module or product as an add-on to your existing license.
    The open source Prey Project is another solution to investigate.
    Regards,
    Aryeh Goretsky
    I am a volunteer and neither a Lenovo nor a Microsoft employee. • Dexter is a good dog • Dexter je dobrý pes
    S230u (3347-4HU) • X220 (4286-CTO) • W510 (4318-CTO) • W530 (2441-4R3) • X100e (3508-CTO) • X120e (0596-CTO) • T61p (6459-CTO) • T43p (2678-H7U) • T42 (2378-R4U) • T23 (2648-LU7)
      Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • Is it true that Apple is introducing low cost Iphones

    I have heard rumours that Apple is introducing low cost iphones,
    can anybody confirm this please
    Would like to buy the low cost iphones for the rest of my family

    Apple has made no announcement about any such thing.

  • Best camera for low light and sports

    have the sx200is
    looking for a newer camera for sports and low light shots

    The challenge with sports is that you are REALLY pushing the camera gear to it's limits.  Fast action requires fast shutter speeds.  But fast shutter speeds demand a lot of light and only outdoor games played during the daytime have that.  Indoor games or games played under field lighting at night generally do not have the kind of lighting needed to shoot with fast shutter speeds -- not the kind of shutter speeds needed to freeze action.  So this ends up demanding a camera with excellent ISO performance and lenses with very low focal ratios so they can collect a LOT more light when the shutter is open.  This gear is expensive.
    You will want to consider a reasonable budget depending on what you can afford and the needs of the specific sports.  
    Are these indoor or outdoor sports? If outdoors, are these played during the day or are they night games?
    The "best" camera for sports and low light is the EOS-1D X.  It has phenominal low-light performance, has an amazing focus system,  and can shoot at 12 frames per second.  But it's about $6800 for the "body only" and then you still need lenses.  I'm guessing this is probably not what you had in mind.  But if money were not a constraint... this would be the one to go for.
    The 5D III is another amazing camera for low light performance and and also has an amazing focusing system (largely the same as the 1D X) can shoot at 6 frames per second, and only costs $3500... again, that's the "body only".  Still probably not what you had in mind.
    The 70D has an extremely good focus system (though not as good as the 5D III and 1D X), not quite as good as low light (but pretty good and much better than a point & shoot camera) and shoots at 7 frames per second (1 fps faster than  5D III) and it only costs $1200 for the body only.
    The T5i will be noticeably less expensive than the 70D... a good (but not extremely good) focusing system and 5 frames per second, but the body and 1 kit lens combined is about $850 but that wont a lens suitable for use shooting sports so you'll still need to invest in more appropriate lenses.
    When shooting action photography in low light, what you _really_ want is a lens that can collect a lot more light than the average lens for that very brief moment when the shutter is open.  Such a lens can allow you to use a faster shutter speed to help freeze those action shots.  But *which* lens you use depends on the sport.  
    For low-light sports, these would ideally be f/2.8 zoom lenses... but f/2.8 zoom lenses are not cheap.  Canon's EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM (ideal for most indoor sports and outdoor sports IF the action is happening close to you) is about $2500.  Sigma's lens is about half that price.  But if you're covering action on a large athletic field and the players are far away, they'll still be small.  Sigma makes a 120-300mm f/2.8 zoom for sports... for the low low price of only $3600.
    Scott Kelby does a video to talk about sports photography and he discusses the equipment used and why... and basically says if you want the gear for shooting sports, you basically need a suitcase full of money.
    Tim Campbell
    5D II, 5D III, 60Da

  • Is there a low cost/free upgrade for recent LR5 purchasers?

    I just bought Lightroom 5. It arrived in my mailbox on Tuesday. Since LR6 just came out, is there some sort of free or low cost upgrade option to go to 6 for people in this situation? There was a similar program during the LR5 launch timeframe for people who bought LR4 just prior to the launch.

    Please contact our Chat team to check if you are eligible to apply for a complimentary upgrade - https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/upgrade-policy-product-announcement.htm l
    Thanks
    Bev

  • Looking for a free or low cost EJB server

    I'm looking to start my own web app to help teach myself EJB and am looking for a free or low-cost ejb app server that I can work on. I realize I get what I pay for so performace isn't an issue. Anyone have suggestions?

    Go to
    http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=241193

  • There is no filter function in numbers for ipad,its very discouraging,as a ipad fan,even nokia lumia providing filter in there low cost mobile

    there is no filter function in numbers for ipad,its very discouraging,as a ipad fan,even nokia lumia providing filter function in excel in there low cost mobile.
    APPLE KINDLY PROVIDE THIS FEATURE AS UPDATE SOON,COZ I WORK ON EXCEL N NUMBERS IN MY IPAD IS DEAD WITH OUT FILTER FUNCTION,I CAN NOT TRAVEL WITH MY IPAD DUE TO THIS REASON,AS I HAVE TO BE IN FIELD WITH SALES FORCE SO I BOUGHT IPAD.

    Probably you know that the new version of Numbers for iOS uses the filters created in the Numbers for Mac version.
    It's not the best solution but it helps (of course, if you have a Mac!)

  • Good low-cost widescreen monitor for one-screen editing?

    Hello, I'm on a tight budget, looking for a widescreen monitor that is a good blend of low-cost but good quality (if possible!).
    I will be doing all my work off this single monitor. I will unfortunately NOT be able to have a dual-monitor setup, nor have an external reference monitor. I will be editing HDV footage.
    Any suggestions? Thanks!

    It is a PVA screen with dual DVI and a D-sub connector.
    I use three of them and they give me a good BFTB, "Bang-for-the-Buck".
    If you consider the various panels in use, they go from low to high in quality, TN >> PVA >> IPS.

  • Best camera for shooting auditions

    I'm looking for a camera (tapeless) that will shoot a native QuickTime format to avoid transcoding. In other words I want to stay away from AVCHD because of how long it takes to transcode into iMovie 09.
    Every camera I see is AVCHD. Since I'm only shooting auditions I don't need the quality to be HD. It's all about the fastest turn around time.
    Does anyone know of a camera (besides the HPX-170 $$$$) that will shoot mini-dv to a flash memory card? This would be ideal.
    Am looking for something that is around $1000.
    Any suggestions?

    Hey,
    Keep in mind that the XL-1s is somewhat clumsy and awkward to handle. If you are used to ENG style... the Canon has no comfortable way to rest it on your shoulder. If you like to hold it out front, using the top handle, while framing your shot with the flip-out LCD... the XL-1s has no flip out LCD. Just a big eye cup style viewfinder.
    The up side is the interchangeable lenses available for the XL-1. But if you are test driving one this weekend, be sure to ask how many lenses that price includes. Also, is there a wide angle adaptor included as well.
    For my money... a used Canon GL-1 or a GL-2 if available, (the GL-2 is the newer version, with a better audio section). Being Canon devices, they already have superior optics. Both camcorders feature optical stabilization and [real glass!] 20:1 built-on lenses, and good sized flip-out LCDs. Since 2000, our church has been using 3 GL-1's for recording the services (via long S-Video runs to the switcher) as well as on remotes for the special dramatizations which are shown on the big screens during the actual services. Never a down day. The GL-1 is able to record in 30p as well as 16:9 anamorphic, and download via Firewire into any NLE. I've owned mine since 2000 as well. Never a glitch in the beginning with iMovie, later with FC Express, or now with FCP 5.1.4!
    So... get yourself a used GL-1 and one of those Beechtek DXA-2S mic/line adaptors, so you can use pro mics in the field, and for under $1,500 you have a formidable, light-weight shooting rig.
    JC
    G5 Quad 2.5 PPC   Mac OS X (10.4.10)   3 monitors powered by GeForce 7800GT and 6600. JVC GY-HD100 camera; FCS 5.1

Maybe you are looking for