4.6 media manager VERY slow

Hello everyone!
I recently installed blackberry desktop manager with media manager 4.6 on my hp laptop and just even opening the media manager program let alone doing anything takes 5-8+ minutes for it to do anything. And even just starting the media manager i want to go make a sandwich and come back.  I really have no idea what is going on with this. Everything else works just fine including the desktop manager and quick but for some reason the media manager just fails at life.  I have tried uninstalling the program and reinstalling it a few times and fully cleaning out the program from the comuter and that has not helped the problem at all.  The computer definatly fast enough that it should eat this program in no time.  The computer is a new dv7 that is brand new and just did a system recovery to brand new state with a p7350 intel core 2 duo 2.0 ghz, 4 gb ram, 500gb hdd so I know that is not the speed of the PC causing it.  One thing I did take notice is that when the blackberry is disconneted the program is almost usable the only thing that I might be able to think is that the program just hates vista 64 bit. Has anyone else experianced this problem and maybe know a way to fix it.  and one other thing that I took notice that is a little strange when I click on media in desktop manager instead of being present with sync or media manager it goes and just opens the media manager.  Any ideas anyone?  Thank you in advance.

I avoid use of Roxio Media Manager.
It is not a well-written software. It is a buggy and non-reliable tool to work with media files.
I prefer to turn on "Mass storage mode support" in Options-Media card and transfer media files directly to my blackberry from desktop computer as an usb-drive.
Below there is link with technical explanation - how to use your blackberry as a usb device:
http://supportforums.blackberry.com/rim/board/message?board.id=BlackBerryDesktopSoftware&message.id=...

Similar Messages

  • Desktop Manager and Roxio Media Manager Soooo Slow

    Desktop Manager and Roxio Media Manager are so slow. Why? Just getting them to open takes five minutes or more.

    I'm glad I found this thread.
    I loaded the Desktop Manager and Roxio Media Manager 2 days ago. It completely crippled my laptop (running Vista, 4GB RAM etc), which previously ran very well.
    I suspected it was Roxio when I watched it take 20 minutes to install.
    Worringly, my laptop was crippled without the Desktop or Roxio software being used. The response rate was once every 5 minutes, and when eventually getting to the Task Manager and looking at the Processes and Applications (a 15 minute job!), there was nothing untoward.
    Having uninstalled them and rebooted, the laptop is back to its former glory so quite what Roxio was doing in the background, I have no idea. I won't be touching it again.
    Matt
    Message Edited by mjsulliva on 04-03-2009 05:13 AM

  • Site manager very slow

    I'm using DW8 ver. 8.0.2 and lately when I go to the site
    manager to create new or edit a site it's very slow, like DW is not
    responding, then it finally goes to the next window. Is there some
    bugs in DW8 that need fixing?
    Also: I added this topic yesterday and this morning it wasn't
    listed in My Forums. Why?

    How many sites do you have? Are the sites all located on the
    computer that
    is running DW? Are you running antivirus scans in real time?
    How large are
    the sites?
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "hocusfocus" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:fb2if3$epd$[email protected]..
    >I have the same problem, it takes ages for site manager
    to open.
    >
    > Geoff
    >

  • Final Cut 10.1 Media Management Very Frustrated

    Hello Final Cut Pros,
    My situation is as follows. I was using Final Cut 10.0.9. That version had a perfect feature that on a simple click allowed me to see all my events organized by Year and even by both year and month if I wanted to. Both Views were simple clicks. I chose to use the By Year and by month view. This is exactly how I want to view my videos in 10.1.  I am not a video professional. These videos are simply my family home videos organized so that we can view them on demand by just going directly to the year and month we want to view. THere are nearly a thousand events spread across 15 years. Upon Upgrading to 10.1 this view has disappeared for me. IN fact it's much worse than that. Each one of my events have now been moved to a 10.1 event. Only there is literally no way of organizing events in 10.1 that I can see. My hundreds of events in 10.1 are simply all lumped together under the one library file that 10.1 created for me. When you search for a way to organize the view of your events you get a little hope when you find that you can orgnize "events" by created date. Only you CAN'T organize events by Created date. You can only organize clips by created date. So when i click to view by created date, my events on the left remain exactly as they were but the clips shown in the browser on the right get organized by Created Date. Nowhere do you see a relationship between the Events on the left which are devoid of any and all organization and the clips on the right neatly organized by Created Date. Now, the thing is in my case I have never  bothered to rename any clip after import. THe clip names themselves have only the clip date as part of the name and that's it. Staring at those clip names for me is useless. After much research, and  couple of fruitless phone calls to Apple Support, I am left completely in the dark. I have spent 3 days agonizing over what to do with this and have decided on somethign that I can;t possibly believe is the answer. I am convinced that I am overlooking somethign brutally obvious but still nobody on the net or anyone in Apple support can point it out to me. Here is what I am doign right now which just has to be wrong. Apple cannot be forcing all of us who are in similar situations to do this, but here goes
    1) I created an Event called ALL EVENTS
    2) I then am going to each of my hundreds of events and doing the following
    3) I am assigning the event name as a Keyword to the clips belonging to that evnt. (No automated way to do this. Nearly a thousand events)
    4) Next, I drag the clips in that event to the ALL EVENTS event. 
    5) I select the keyword collection which is named the same as my event and which now appears in the ALL EVENTS folder and on the broser window I can see the  clips. THe clips are organized by date. 
    6) THen I create a folder in tthe ALL EVENTS folder with the year of the clips and another folder inside the year folder for teh month of the clips. I then drag the Keyword collection to inside the month.
    Doign the above is the only way that I can conceive of with 10.1 to see all of my home videos organized by year and by month. Dividing any of this into multiple events and/or mutiple libraries is useless to me from what I can see. I want to be able to enter the word CHristmas and have all videos relating to Christmas for every year pop up. I don;t belive that can happen with 10.1 if clips are stored across events, and certainly not across libraries but I could be wrong.
    I am just about convinced that I am about to be totally emabarrased by someone's 1 or 2 sentence reply to this post explaining what I need to be doing that will not consume days if not weeks of my time like the steps I described above in order to have a By Year and by Month view of my videos.
    Thank you all for any help you can provide
    Javier

    WOW, my frustration is mounting to no end. Tom, I have searched over and over again. There is nothing out there that addresses my very, very clearly stated predicament in this post. While I most definitely appreciate your response to my post, please notice that you also are not directly addressing and answering my question. Leaving me to continue to suspect that the answer is simply that no there is no way to get a view by Year and By Month without putting in weeks of work". I am looking for a white paper from Apple that addresses the followign question exactly,
    "Hi Mr. Final Cut user, if you have an event library that is based ont he current system whihc allows you to clearly view all of your events by Year and by MOnth here is what you need to do to achieve the same thign in 10.1/ . Here are some of the suggestions on how you might be able to TRANSITION". Of course everyone's case is different Mr Final Cut User but of the 4 or 5 clearly stated options we've given you here it's up to you which one you chooise. And BTW none of the options we;ve given you require you to put in weeks of work to get to what you had already."
    Again, I don;t feel that an answer to my question can be "well to each their own. Everybody's workflow is different so you ahve to get to know 10.1 through online materials. That's baloney. The Group by Year and Month was an option right on the GUI. Its akin to them removing the Import feature and telling us all that everybody imports different.  
    I AM NOT the only person who had all their clips in EVENTS.  THe EVENT in the new media management is nothing like the EVENT in the old. Actually the fact that named it EVENT may be adding to the confusion.
    Tom, if you know Final Cut then you know exactly what's just happened to me. Nearly 1000 events have been dumped into separate 10.1 events yet there is no Event-based organization at all. THere is nothing out there at all addressing this question. Again, in Final Cut 10.0.9 I was clicking once and getting all my events organized instantenaously by Year and by Month. If you would be so kind as to please just answer this question for me before I put in weeks of work. With the new 10.1 am I forced to do tons of work in order to get to see my videos again by Year and by Month? THis answer would be very helpful to me because right now I am in disbelief that I have to do that. It makes the work I am doing very depressing. For all I know, there actually is a way to do it very easily or maybe Apple knows about this issue and is about to issue a fix for it.
    MY quetion is simple. Can someone please help me.
    Thank You Very Much for any help you can provide

  • Media Encoder VERY Slow With Neat Denoiser Effect Applied

    I understand that some 3rd party effects are not GPU accelerated and may take a bit longer to code, but this is ridiculous. I thought there might have been an improvement to this by now. I cannot possibly have a faster computer than i do now, and this is still a serious problem. Do you people at Adobe talk to these 3rd parties about their products? Red Giant is anotherr serious problem. I can't afford to wait for these long render times. I'll go out of business for sure.

    Video DeNoiser plug-ins are notoriously slow by their nature, this is not Adobe's fault. Each HD frame of video has millions of pixels in it, and each pixel needs to be compared to those in the frames before and after to make a determination as to what is "image" and what is "noise" and the resulting clean image then needs to be calculated. Motion in the video complicates the process.
    I use Red Giant DeNoiser II and which is now GPU-accelerated to make it a few times faster than it used to be, but it still takes many hours to do an entire program. Just how it is.
    My suggestion is to apply the DeNoiser filter to the raw video clip prior to editing, to create a new (clean) clip using a lossless intermediate codec. Let that process run overnight. Then use that new clip for the editing without lag and with fast (normal) export times. If I apply denoiser in the timeline, everything grinds to a halt! Previews suck. I just process the raw clip in After Effects, export to Lagarith codec for instance (on PC), then edit that in Premiere. Mac users may want to use ProRes. Avid DNxHD is another good codec for Mac or PC.
    Thanks
    Jeff Pulera
    Safe Harbor Computers

  • DW8 Site manager very slow

    All of a sudden my DW8 Site Manager takes ages to let me edit
    a site. It does
    eventually open the site, but has me wait for several
    minutes. The problems
    affects all sites.
    I have renamed my configuration folder and a new one was duly
    created but the
    problem persists.
    Any ideas what could cause this and how to remedy it?
    Regards,
    Adriana.
    [ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
    www.spinsister.nl

    How many sites do you have? Are the sites all located on the
    computer that
    is running DW? Are you running antivirus scans in real time?
    How large are
    the sites?
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "hocusfocus" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:fb2if3$epd$[email protected]..
    >I have the same problem, it takes ages for site manager
    to open.
    >
    > Geoff
    >

  • Firefox is very slow to respond when opening and nearly always stops responding altogether even refusing to react to Task Manager "End Program@ command. The "not responding@ error message also comes up during navigation on line.

    Firefox is very slow to respond when opening and nearly always stops responding altogether, even refusing to react to the Task Manager "End Program" command. The "not responding" error message also comes up during navigation on line. Several attempt have to be made to get on line. A loss of stability seems to be endemic at the moment.

    Try following the instructions here: [[Firefox hangs]]

  • HT1338 XSERVE 10.6.8 is running very slow, and Workgroup Manager is not responding

    XSERVE 10.6.8 is running very slow, and Workgroup Manager is not responding. There is no more updates to download.

    munish khanna wrote:
    1. upgrade to lion, which should over write previous software and the reasons for it being slow.
    No, you don't want to upgrade over a buggy system, Lion has issues of it's own that will only complicate matters, plus Lion is slower than Snow Leopard.
    Learn all the pitfalls before you upgrade to Lion, like all your Rosetta/older programs will no longer work and more.
    Leave Lion for a new hardware purchase is my advice, it's still got plenty of security and other issues.
    For your performance, your likely better off replacing the hard drive with a 7,200 RPM model and maxing the RAM, download the free MacTracker to find out your specs, and OtherWorld Computing is good for videos, tools and parts.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/installvideos/
    2. Format the hard disc and reinstall snow leopard.
    That will work, provided your data is off the machine first.
    Now how do i reinstall snow leopard as it was an online purchased upgrade from leopard.
    The 10.6 Snow Leopard disk that you upgraded 10.5 Leopard from actually has the full OS X 10.6 on it.
    All you have to do is stick the disk in and hold the c key down while booting, use Disk Utility to erase the entire drive, quit and install 10.6.
    Of course your not going to get the free iLife that came with the 10.5 grey disks, see if you can first install 10.5 with the same methods, then setup with the same user name as before, then upgrade to 10.6
    I think Apple nulled booting off the 10.5 disks, but it won't hurt to try.
    Another method would be to install 10.6 fresh by itself, then use the program called Pacifist to extract iLife from the 10.5 disks.
    http://www.charlessoft.com/
    Read here for plenty of how to's
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/16276201#16276201

  • Vista slow when Roxio Media Manager installed

    Hi guys,
    I have a Blacbkberry Bold and installed the desktop software with media manager straight out the box.
    It all works great only when vista is loading up it is incredibly slow.  My antivirus (Mcaffee) and internet connection status in the taskbar do not start as they used to.
    I have narrowed the problem down to Roxio as when i uninstalled it vista loaded perfectly.
    I had DS 4.6 out of box but upgraded to 4.7.
    Does anybody know why Roxio does this?  Its a nice piece of kit and would like to use it again, but not when it affects vista so badly!
    I have the following system:
    Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU  Q6600 @ 2.40GHz  2.40 GHz
    3.00GB RAM
    32-bit OS
    Can anybody help or know a solution?

    If you wish a free tool to convert your DVD and avi files to movies to play on blackberry I would suggest the Handbrakeapplication.
    I use it for my needs and it is good for me.
    You can download it here
    I discussed about it here
    To convert mp3's I recommend to use free open source tool CDex

  • Filling out form in FedEx Ship Manager is very slow...

    All of a sudden trying to fill out a shipping doc in FedEx Ship Manager is very slow. Each letter typed ends up with athe spinning beach ball for 5 or 6 seconds. Safari version Version 6.1 (8537.71). Never had an Safari issue before with this site and Firefox works fine. (Ended up using FF to get the shipment done) 
    Any ideas what is going on?

    Same here, I create many, many Fedex labels on a daily basis for work. In Mountin Lion things were working excellent, just upgraded to Mavericks and Fedex is unusable. Firefox (even in its latest version 25) works perfect with Fedex and on Mavericks too. This is definitely a problem caused by Mavericks and has nothing to do with FedEx. I think it is related to how security for JavaScript has been changed, or how Sandboxing in tabs and JavaScript relate to each other in the new version of Safari. No updates to the latest Java will fix it, because the fields on the FedEx form are populated through JavsScript coding and in this case Java is not being invoked at all. Thats why you may have different versions of Java installed, or not even have it installed, yet in Safari 7.0 those forms from FedEx and evidently form some other sites will beachball. So the only solution currently is to use another browser, which is really a lame solution. If Apple wants to make us use Safari more often, step up to the plate and show an improvement in the browser, not regressions. Mind you this is a huge regression! I have been creating labels in Fedex for some 7-8 years now and there has never been an update to Safari that would cause such a disaster. And by the way, I use Webkit nightlies. Granted the developers there tend to break things, but are very responsive and provide a fix usually within day or two. Those are the same guys that develop the new versions of Safari core and rendering, so I'm curious as to who would be voicing support here in the discussion. One thing is clear, even todays nightly of Webkit is also beachballing, so the problem is not directly related to Webkit.

  • Concurrent  Manager is very slow

    hi,
    My concurrent Manager is very slow. It is taking 1 min
    to run simple reports also
    why it is so...
    can anybody help me please...how to get rid out of this problem
    My version is 11.5.9
    I put processes for concurrent standard manager as below
    actual processes = 10
    target procesess = 10
    only 3 users are connnected.
    what may be the problem friends

    Hi,
    List the tables and indexes associated responsible for creating a stage for the Concurrent Managers.
    Try this:
    ALTER TABLE OWNER.FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS MOVE;
    ALTER TABLE APPLSYS.FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES MOVE;
    ALTER TABLE APPLSYS.FND_CONCURRENT_QUEUES MOVE;
    REBUILD INDEXES ON THE ABOVE TABLES;
    ALTER INDEX APPLSYS.INDEX_NAME REBUILD
    OR
    ALTER INDEX APPLSYS.INDEX_NAME REBUILD OFFLINE;
    Answer yourself: Check the size of the tables and see if you are purging the obsolete data regularly.
    If you cannot purge the data then:
    1) Shutdown application and concurrent managers
    2) Take the backup of the tables: the three mentioned above.
    3) Take an export of the tables (owner - apps)
    4) login to database
    5) truncate the original tables.
    6) drop the tables.
    7) recreate the tables - you can get the structure information from the backup you have taken.
    8) import the data into the tables.
    9) start concurrent managers and application.
    10) Test if your concurrent managers are still slow ?
    Hope the above mentioned steps will help you achieve the kinda performance you are looking for.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Managing Site - Very slow

    Lately when I have to set up a new site and I click new or
    edit in Manage Sites, it's very slow, almost like its hung up and
    DW8 is freezing up, finally it goes to the next window. What could
    cause that? It's never done that before. Is it a bug or something?
    I'm using version 8.0.2

    Probably better off asking this question in the DW newsgroup
    - alex
    geovino wrote:
    > Lately when I have to set up a new site and I click new
    or edit in Manage
    > Sites, it's very slow, almost like its hung up and DW8
    is freezing up, finally
    > it goes to the next window. What could cause that? It's
    never done that before.
    > Is it a bug or something?
    > I'm using version 8.0.2
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

  • Record playback is very slow between Flash Media Server and Flash

    hi all
    I have done server side recording successfully with red5 flash media server and can see
    that the flv record is being created properly.
    Then if I try to playback the record like
    NetStream.play("record.flv"), I see that stream playing is very very
    slow, for both of audio and video.
    And then if I try to playback the recorded file via using the
    filesystem path of it, everthing seems fine.
    Problem occurs when I try to sucscribe and play the stream of the record.
    PS : There is no problem with playing the published stream
    (NetStream.play("streamName"))
    Does anyone have an idea about this issue?
    If you need any additional information, please let me know.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards

    In a nutshell flowplayer delivers the video through your web
    browser. It does this via http protocol (port 80) and progressive
    download on any web server
    Progressive download finds the video on the server and plays
    it back through the player as it is being downloaded. 2 important
    things to take from this are 1, the video is being downloaded to
    the clients hard drive, at the end of the playback they will have a
    copy of your video that they can do whatever they like to and
    repost it somewhere else. 2, It plays back as it downloads, meaning
    if I'm viewing a 10 minute video from your site and want to skip
    ahead to the middle or end I have to wait for the whole video to
    download before viewing those segments. Your web host by the way
    will love you for progressive download because it will appear as
    though your transfer rate has gone through the roof. Once the
    request for the video is made there is no turning back, the client
    gets the whole thing whether they watch it or not.
    Flash media server uses the rtmp protocol. This protocol is
    an open socket protocol through port 1935. This is a two way street
    essentially. When the user views a video using FMS they basically
    get only enough of the video to keep the connection open and
    satisfy the required buffer to assure clean playback. The bytes of
    info that carry the video only go to the users memory, not the hard
    drive. This allows the user to jump back and forth around in the
    movie without having to wait for the whole thing to download.
    Hope that helps.

  • Very slow running CUITs in both Visual Studio and Microsoft Test Manager

    I've tried the exact same test cases on another less powerful computer and it runs perfectly. However on one machine it runs very slow. It seems to take ages finding execute each step. Not sure what is going on. Help greatly appreciated.

    Hi Daithi,
    Based on your issue, I suggest you could try to create a simple coded UI test such as you can record the Calculator action and then check if you still get the issue about
    running CUITs very slow in VS.
    In addition, I suggest you could try to delete all the temp files from your system and other temp files, or in short you can just log off and then log in back again....you'll definitely find your automation run faster.
    There are two blogs shared us some suggestions to improve the coded UI test performance, I often use them, if possible, please check them.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vstsqualitytools/archive/2011/07/06/improving-the-performance-of-your-coded-ui-tests.aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/02/01/guidelines-on-improving-performance-of-coded-ui-test-playback.aspx
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Financial management module is very slow for consolidation/posting executed

    Hi all,
    we are using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Financial Managemenet module; our process of consolidation/posting is very slow at the day-end ? We have about 300-400 entries/invoices and it takes about 3-4 hours to get it done.
    Please suggest what can be hotspot areas to look into?
    If some step-by-step document then do share with me on [email protected]
    If possible then do let me know some changes to be made for faster processing of said consolidation/posting;
    Best Regards
    Talok Khatri

    My suggestion is that you contact Oracle Support for assistance on this. I wonder if you might need to upgrade your computer hardware. It should not be taking that long to process that volume of activity. Are there perhaps other activity going on at the same time that could be slowing down the posting process? You probably need to monitor the system to see what is happening when this is running. Maybe it is running against a data backup at the same time? Support would need to help you work through the possible causes.
    John Dickey

Maybe you are looking for