ACH : Mapping of F110 to Idoc

Hi Guys
We are establishing ACH payment method in our company. When we run F110, the entries go to REGUH table. Do we have to run any program to generate a Idoc? If yes, how do we map it to Idoc ?
Thanks for your help!!

As the server probably survives (you restart your Integration Builder and can probably connect immediately), the problem will be on your side (client). Did you add one or more large xml-test-instances to the mapping ? If yes, delete them, because they lower the performance and can make problems. If not, then this is a strange problem. Even if the Idoc structure is complex, the mapping object itself cannot be that large.Is this problem only with this one mapping ?
CSY
Edited by: Christian Sy on Mar 9, 2010 6:26 AM

Similar Messages

  • SP14 Multi-mapping - error in receiver idoc adapter

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where a business service should send some XML to SAP CRM. I get the file via a sender JMS adapter and try to post it to CRM via a receiver IDOC adapter.
    I have created a multimapping (1:N - 1 XML file to many Idocs) as should in the repository.
    In the configuration under Interface Determination, I have chosen 'RB_SPLIT' and selected the interface multimapping.
    It should be pointed out, that when testing both interface and message mapping i get no error. All idocs seem to be created as they should.
    When testing the setup 'real life' the message fails. The error message in the monitor says:
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_WRONG_INTF</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>InterfaceCollection</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Unable to interpret IDoc interface InterfaceCollection</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Notice that the above error is when trying to send only 1 record, which in turn then should result in only 1 idoc.
    If trying to send multiple XML records, i get the following error:
    - <!--  Technical Routing
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">MMF_ENGINETYPE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>A system error occurred in the outbound binding</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    In the monitor in the payload of 'Request message mapping' I see as many Maindocument, Submaindocument pairs as should be Idocs.
    Now i really don't know how to interpret the error messages in both cases, so I'm a little lost here...
    It should be pointed out that the idoc being used everywhere in this scenario, has not been modified - from all places it is being used (and only exists) in the 'Imported objects | Idocs' place.
    Also the Idoc is also being used as Inbound interface - so no mistakes here either.
    I really hope someone can help me here, as I'm otherwise pretty stuck in this case.
    Best regards,
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    I have exactly the same type of scenario (under SPS14 and now also SPS15), sending an XML message over JMS to XI and trying a multi-mapping to many IDocs (actually a list of orders in XML is mapped to n ORDERS Idocs).
    I also face problems doing so, when I use the IDoc Adapter as outbound in the Receiver Agreement. I receive the following error:
    <i>CO_TXT_MMF_ENGINETYPE
    Messages in multi message format can be sent to one adapter engine only</i>
    However, I tested the same scenario by just changing the Receiver Agreement to a File Communication Channel and - surprise, surprise - it works. One file per IDoc is created.
    Of course, this is not what we want to accomplish, but when I checked this piece of documentation (sorry another link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
    the IDoc adapter is not listed in the list of Adapters that are supported. Does that mean, that this feature is not supported for generating IDocs? Maybe that's a question for a SAP OSS Message?
    I hope that helped you a little further - if you find out more I'd be happy to learn about it.
    regards,
    Peter

  • Mapping problem wsdl to idoc

    Hi all,
                I am using a external defination in a webservice scenario.When I import the wsdl file into the message mapping its not showing the structure of the message type of the wsdl.Now please suggest me how can I map it to a idoc structure.The message type is of xsd string ,its just being shown in the wsdl

    hi Abhishek,
    for your scenario, WS to IDOC you have to create the WSDL in PI.
    you have to define the DT,MT and MI and later in integration directory once you define the communication channel type SOAP sender, you have to go>tools>define Web Services.
    see this
    Soap Sender Channel Config
    Thanks
    Rodrigo

  • Java heap space error occured during message mapping of FILE to IDOC

    hello Friends,
                          I am trying to do the message mapping for File to Idoc scenario.
    Idoc which I am using is HRMD_A.HRMD_A06 and infotype which I want to update is 14. I am trying to map the message type which I hav created for infotype 14 with the IDOC
    Its very simple scenerio but  every time I try to save the mapping before activating it I get an error:
    Java heap space
    Internal problem occurred (INTERNAL_PROBLEM)
    Java heap space.
                I am not able to figure out what possibly is the problem wheather its from my end or the BASIS end.
    Kindly help.
    Regards,
    Lokesh

    As the server probably survives (you restart your Integration Builder and can probably connect immediately), the problem will be on your side (client). Did you add one or more large xml-test-instances to the mapping ? If yes, delete them, because they lower the performance and can make problems. If not, then this is a strange problem. Even if the Idoc structure is complex, the mapping object itself cannot be that large.Is this problem only with this one mapping ?
    CSY
    Edited by: Christian Sy on Mar 9, 2010 6:26 AM

  • Mapping edi 820 VS idoc

    Hi
    I am doing mapping for EDI 820  and PEXR2002 IDOC output . I couldnt able to map for sure certain  interchange control header and functional group header ?. I need to submit this map to EDI team to process . For example Control number field ,Sender application code ,Reciever application code i couldnt able to map corresponding segments in IDOC for Sure .
    It would be appreciated if you could help me out in this .
    Email id  [email protected]
    Thanks in advance

    thanks

  • Mapping for Sales Order Idoc

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing problem with mapping for standard SalesOrder Idoc ORDERS.ORDER05.
    My Source Structure is: X12 EDI850
    <G_SPO1> (occrance 1..100000)
    <S_PO1> (occurance is 1..1)
                      <D_234/>
                      <D_234_2/>
                      <D_234_3/>
                      <D_234_4/>
                      <D_234_5/>
                      <D_234_6/>
                      <D_234_7/>
                      <D_234_8/>
                      <D_234_9/>
                      <D_234_10/>
    </S_PO1>
    </G_SPO1>
    Target Structure is:
    E1EDP01
        --->E1EDP19
                    --->IDTNR
    Functionality is passing material numbers of EDI customers to IDTNR field in E1EDP19 filed under segment E1EDP01.
    From source i will get set of material numbers, for one set 10 material numbers(In source you can find 10 fields for 10 material numbers)
    Requirement: I need to send those material numbers to IDTNR (One to one mapping ).
    For getting 10 material numbers i just duplicated segment E1EDP19 in target side and mapped one field of source to IDTNR target in each segment. Totally mapped 10 source fields in 10 segments.
    If 20 material numbers I will get two sets <G_SPO1> will repeat two times, each time 10 material numbers. So I mapped G_SPO1 to E1EDP01
    S_PO1 to E1EDP19.
    My out put is coming as 10 E1EDP19 segments under E1EDP01 if 10 materail numbers.
    But problem is ECC team asking to get one E1EDP19 line item value under E1EDP01 line item header. They are not accepting duplicate E1EDP19 segments under header E1EDP01.
    How to acheive this with my requirement.
    Appreciate your hellp on this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    A.Neelima.

    There is no relation between D_234 and D_356.
    I want to pass D_356 to KTEXT in all E1EDP01 segments which ever i will get based on the condition we implemented for E1EDP01.
    Present its coming only for E1EDP01 first segment (for which i used condition with D_234), its not coming for remaining 9 E1EDP01 segments (for which i used conditions with D_234_2 to D_234_10)
    If i pass sample input payload:
    <S_ST>
    <S_PID>
    <D_350>Description</D_350>
    </S_PID>
    <G_SPO1>
    <S_PO1>
    <D_234>1</D_234>
    <D_234_2/>2</D_234_2>
    <D_234_3/>
    <D_234_4/>
    <D_234_5/>
    <D_234_6/>
    <D_234_7/>
    <D_234_8/>
    <D_234_9/>
    <D_234_10/>
    </S_PO1>
    </G_SPO1>
    <G_SPO1>
    <S_PO1>
    <D_234>3</D_234>
    <D_234_2>4<D_234_2>
    <D_234_3/>
    <D_234_4/>
    <D_234_5/>
    <D_234_6/>
    <D_234_7/>
    <D_234_8/>
    <D_234_9/>
    <D_234_10/>
    </S_PO1>
    </G_SPO1>
    </S_ST>
    Coming Output Now: (KTEXT field is missing in last two segments)
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>1</IDTNR>
    <KTEXT>Decription</KTEXT>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>3</IDTNR>
    <KTEXT>Decription</KTEXT>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>2</IDTNR>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>4</IDTNR>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    Expected Output:
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>1</IDTNR>
    <KTEXT>Decription</KTEXT>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>3</IDTNR>
    <KTEXT>Decription</KTEXT>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>2</IDTNR>
    <KTEXT>Decription</KTEXT>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP01>
    <E1EDP19>
    <IDTNR>4</IDTNR>
    <KTEXT>Decription</KTEXT>
    </E1EDP19>
    </E1EDP01>
    Thnaks & Regards,
    A.Neelima.

  • Use of Orders05 Interface mapping & XSLT mapping file for Orders03 IDOC

    Hello Experts,
    In a scenario we are sending Purchase orders and Purhase Order change from SAP to SNC through XI.
    Currently Orders03 IDoc is used and standard mapping for Orders03 XSLT is used.
    Now the requirement is to use the same IDOC (Orders03) but
    - XSLT mapping (OrdersOrders05_ReplenishmentOrderNotification) and
    - Interface Mapping (OrdersOrders05_ReplenishmentOrderNotification_01) of Orders05.
    What changes would be necessary
    - On SAP side,
    - in the XSLT mapping, and
    - On XI side.
    Thanks in advance,
    Suraj

    Hi Suraj,
    First compare ORDERS03 IDOC and ORDERS05 IDoc structures,if both structures are same then u no ned to chnage the XSL it will work fine.
    If any chnages in ORDERS05 Idoc then u have to adjust XSLT as per ORDERS05 IDOC.
    test interface mapping first and let me know if any error.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Procedure for Mapping two types of Idocs from RFC function Module

    Hi
    My Scenario is RFC -- XI -- IDOC
    Here i have 2 custom Idocs
    First IDOC for Creation
    second is for Deletion/Changing
    Based on the condition from RFC it should trigger either one of the IDOC above.
    Please provide me the procedure to do in IR and ID..
    Regards,
    Yeswanth.

    YeswanthRaj:
    I found your conflicted statements
    The following statement you say you just have one receiver, to receive two IDOCs
    But i have only one receiver where the 2 IDOcs needs to be send based on the condition..
    The following statements showing that you have more than one receiver,
    the condition editor for receiver determination usually used for multiple receivers based on XPATH or Context Object condition
    It is mapped based on the condition that is given in Receiver Determination and i has two interface Determinations.
    It seems that the first scenario is your situation.
    If your answer is yes, and your source interface is just one,and target interface is two (two IDOC), then this should be typical
    muti-mapping scenario, and the propose I gave to you should fit
    Regards.
    Liang

  • Mapping FLAT File to Idoc

    Hi,
    I have to implement a flatfile --> XI ---> IDOC scenario and I have a question about the mapping.
    Suppose I have a Flat Fiel as following with the first 2columns as key:
    100991;001;text1;posting date
    100991;002;text2;posting date
    100992;001;text4;posting date
    100992;002;text6;posting date
    I have to pass this items to a IDOC strucutured  with header and positions.
    By mapping how can I group  key data to pass to single Idoc?
    Thanks
    marco

    Hi ,
    I have done it with ORDERS IDOC Structure .
    Since the source is a flat file you could take a simple structure with row and all the fields following it ( say filed1 , field2, field3).
    Take a bottom up approach for the child :
    Change the context of all the individual fields to the root then apply split by value on field3 ( this introduces context changes )
    Then format its parents Queue (Field2) based on Field3 Queue for this use the function Format By Example .
    Use the resulting queue  as one of the argument and Field1 to generate the link .
    Using Graphical this requirement is achievable . How ever it is upto your ease to choose which way you want to do it .
    Thanks & Regards
    Kavitha

  • Payment (f110) of IDOCs spliting into batches and move to folder in al11

    I am working with a senario where in I need to trigger an payment proposal from F110 with reference of Document
    Stettings which I have done
    Posting Date : 22.07.2010
    Docs entered up to :22.07.2010
    Customer items due by : 22.10.2010
    Company Code : 8000
    Payment Method : RG
    Vendor : A321
    In Free Selection
    The Document Number :
    I Have not selected any logtypes in Addtional Log
    Printout/Data Medium
    Programs : ZFIR_RFFOEDI1
    I have not selected any program for List
    after creating payment I'm Apporving through ZAP1 (<50000) and ZAP2( >50000) tcodes after arroval its geneating the idocs , ican see in we02/we05
    after that in AL11 directoty in that under intermediate path  '/usr/sap/DEV/interface/scbpayment/intermediate/'
    if I'm creating payment 20 at the same time some of ZAP1 and ZAP2 ...it combines all the idocs i need to separate them in intermediate folder.
    and i created paths in AL11
    '/usr/sap/DEV/interface/scbpayment/intermediate/zap1'
    '/usr/sap/DEV/interface/scbpayment/intermediate/zap2'
    but nt coming into this folder how can i change into this folders after approval ZAP1 & ZAP2.
    Thnaks
    Gaddam

    Hi..
    Thanks for reply..i need under Intermediate path and i need to use conditions.
    If Payment is below 50000 then ZAP1 Tcode will approve the Payment and same as ZAP2
    if payment is greater then 50000 then ZAP2 Tcode will approve the payment.
    so where can i change this condition.and debug the program but i can't find.
    Thanks
    Gaddam

  • Mapping from File to IDoc with multiple Idocs and multiple line items?

    Hi All,
    Need some help with mapping, requirement as below: I have a flat file with multiple records, need to create multiple idocs per each separate order in flat file with as many line items.
    Order_1 field-1 field-2 field-3 field-4
    Order_1 field-1 field-2 field-3 field-4
    Order_2 field-1 field-2 field-3 field-4
    Order_2 field-1 field-2 field-3 field-4
    Order_3 field-1 field-2 field-3 field-4
    Order_3 field-1 field-2 field-3 field-4
    I have imported IDoc changed to 1:Unbounded, able to create multiple Idocs based on separate order from flat file.
    Order_No - removeContexts - splitByValue(ValueChanged) - collapseContexts - exists - creatIf - IDOC
    Now I am having hard time creating a line item segment E1EDP01. I want to have Idoc created below way:
    IDoc-1 (Order_1)
    E1EDP01
    E1EDP01
    IDoc-2 (Order_2)
    E1EDP01
    E1EDP01
    IDoc-3 (Order_3)
    E1EDP01
    E1EDP01
    I am getting multiple IDocs created. Please help me to create mutlieple line items under each Idoc. Please be speficic about the node funtions to be used, because I tried many times with different combinations, didn't work.
    Regards,
    [email protected]!n

    Hi Navin,
    Create your source structure like below
    <Order>1 to unbounded
        <Order_No>
        <field1>
        <field2>
        <field3>
        <field4>
    </oder>
    to create mutiple IDocs based on order number,use below logic
    Order_No-->removecontexts--->sort--->splitbyvalue(Valuechange)--->collapsecontext-->Idoc
    use below logic for E1EDPO1,
    Order----->removecontexts------>
                                                                                    formatByexample------>E1EDP01
    Order_No-->removecontexts--->sort--->splitbyvalue(Valuechange)-------->
    try above logic and let me know if you any issues.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Error in mapping of request message (IDoc)

    Hi!
    I am facing with the following mapping error.
    I try to map data element MT_Material to IDoc MATMAS.MATMAS02
    com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_MT_Material_MATMAS02_</Trace>
    <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /MATMAS02/IDOC/E1MARAM. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start(AMappingProgram.java:406)
    Can some one help me to solve this problem?
    Thank you very much!
    regards
    Thom

    Hi,
    It is cardinality error, You need to verify the cardinality of the source and of the target. For examples
           Source         Target
    1.       0..1             1
    2.         1               1
    In the first case, you can get an error if the source file is not comnig  the field(optional), so you can use "mapwithDefault" Standar function to assign a default value.
    For the second case It seems never could raise any error, but remember that the input file can not follow the xsd definition (PI<7.1  does not have a xsd parser). For this case You can use  "mapwithDefault" too, but only to test. because is not recommendable to map with a default to all entries, It is only for the optionals.
    I hope It helps You.
    Ivan

  • Message mapping: SOAP Receiver to IDOC Sender

    hi,
    i have an idoc sent to SOAP receiver. SOAP Response will have only the "Status code" and the "Reason of failure".
    IDOC Sender will have the PO Number and the Vendor Name to which we are sending.
    The SOAP Response will not have the PO Number and the Vendor Name.
    How can i have the Reason of failure, PO Number and Vendor in one message type?
    Thanks in advance,
    Tirumal

    Praveen -
    Thanks for the response and appreciate your observation.
    Very tight deadlines with the client and have to finish lot of tasks in short time so putting hands in everything.
    There are lot of vendors who run their proprietary web services. So cannot change their stuff.
    How would i map the SOAP request to the SOAP Response since some information is in one message type and other half of information available in other message type.
    I created a SOAP Response Type with the "Reason Code" information.
    I created another message type with all the information that i want.
    How would i map the SOAP Request to the SOAP Response msg type and the other message type.
    Let me know.
    Thanks in advance,
    Tirumal

  • Pass through scenario in SAP PI with no mapping for File to IDoc and Idoc to file scenarios

    Hi Experts,
    Can i have step by step process in SAP PI for pass through scenario with no mapping in case of file to Idoc and Idoc to file both cases please.
    What objects i can skip.
    My PI system is 7.3 dual stack.
    I have seen below blogs, still its confusing to me.
    When and how to create an scenario in SAP PI without mapping objects.
    Pass Through Scenario with no Mapping in PI 7.1
    Appreciate your help on this.
    Regards,
    Mohan.

    Hi Mohan
    In pass thru interface you don't need to create any ESR objects, only ID objects are required.
    Just Create a Receiver Determination and Receiver Agreement for your scenario (no need for Interface Det. and Sender Agreement).
    Specify the IDOC in the Sender Interface and namespace as urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
    Or instead of creating objects manually, Run the wizard with Idoc name/namespace in sender/receiver interface
    Regards
    Osman

  • Mapping of large INVOIC Idocs

    Dear SAP,
    we have a 1:n mapping scenario.
    The source is an INVOIC Idoc that will be splitted into several messages.
    The INVOIC IDoc has a sice of 5MB and more than 35.000 data sets.
    Because of the huge number of data sets / positions, there are two new
    child-segments containing the data sets (see attachment).
    INVOIC IDocs with only eg. 100 data sets has noch such child-segments
    (see attachments).
    In PI message mapping there is an error while mapping large INVOIC IDocs:
    While 1:1 mapping of positions (E1EDP01) the text segments
    (E1EDPT1/E1EDPT2) are not mapped correctly.
    While mapping a position of child-segment ONE the text is mapped from a
    position from child-segment TWO.
    In our case the 166th position of child-segment ONE is mapped, but the
    text is comming from the 166th. position of child-segment TWO.
    The text mapping is 1:1. It works without errors while proceeding smaller INVOIC IDocs.
    We can´t explain this behaviour.
    Also the standard INVOIC structure does not provide such child-segments
    while uploading into PI.
    Is it a buffer problem in PI?
    Is there a maximum number of data records in INVOICE IDocs?
    Do we have to adjust the INVOICE structure in PI?
    Thanks in advance,
    André

    Is it a buffer problem in PI?
    Could be, but I have used bigger message size without any issues. If your mapping is not too complex, could you write an XSL mapping and check if you run into similar situation? Message mapping has definitely cache issues, hence I prefer XSL.
    Is there a maximum number of data records in INVOICE IDocs?
    No.
    Do we have to adjust the INVOICE structure in PI?
    No need to adjust the structure, just try with XSL mapping.

Maybe you are looking for