Activation of Adobe Form takes too long / XML problem?

Dear all,
I copied a standard form to customer name a year ago with life cycle designer version 7. The designer was updated to 8.
When making a change to the adobe form now, the activation takes more than 30 minutes in some cases. I copied the original form again and the activation takes less than 3 minutes.
When calling the XML Coding-tab within the designer it also takes very long and in some cases the system crashes ....
Has anyone an idea why this happens and if there is anything that i can do with changing attributes or other settings? I also tried to copy the copied form again. Same problem. Only when copying the standard form the activation is normal. I made too many changes so to start over again would take long. I would like to avoid this.
Thank you!
Regards
Viktoria

Hi,
I could not solve this. Had to create the form again. Tried to copy most of the elements into it.
Now it works again and is activated within 1-2 minutes.
So no real solution...
Regards
Viktoria

Similar Messages

Interactive forms takes too long to load - sometimes crashes reader.

Hi Gurus,
I'm just wondering if anyone have this problem?
I just configured ADS and created a sample WD program to display an interactive form, the form is not complex, only 2 text fields and an image.
But when I deploy or run the program, the interactive form container hangs and take very long to process before displaying.
After I save the PDF file to a local drive, when I try to open it, it will take very long and sometimes crash my system.
Even when I click on "PDF Preview" to view the form in NWDS it take very long too.
At first I thought it could be due to my system and I open downloaded PDF file on other PCs, but the problem occurs too in those PCs.
Using Acrobat Reader 8.1.2, then downgraded to 8.1.1, still no avail.
Everytime I open the PDF or WD loads the PDF, when I check the Task Manager the process of AcroRdr32 will hog the system processes and use up the memory. I have no problems with other PDF files, only those generated by the WD application gives problems.
Someone hit the same problem? Any advise? Could it be the ACF or Adobe lifecycle issues?
Please help. Thanks for all answers.
Best Regards,
Jansen

Hi Jansen,
If you are using Adobe Reader 8.1.* or above and activex controls in your form, you need to install the latest version of ACF and that will resolve the issue. And do remember to uninstall your old version of Adobe Reader first and then install Reader 8.1.* freshly and after installing it proceed with ACF installation. You have to follow the sequence.
For ACF installation you may read Note 766191 - Active Component Framework Installation.
ACF Installable:
https://sapmats-de.sap-ag.de/download/download.cgi?id=F9RUZ3Q7TERUBSMHSXWT3UMEM59IJYIPA931VQD32A1UNAKZ6B
Do reward points if found helpful.
Regards,
Arafat

Adobe Store takes too long to deliver download and serial information

Earlier this week we received some Indesign files for a job, but they were in Indesign 5 format, so we were unable to open them with Indesign CS4. So, taking this as a sign that it was time to upgrade, yesterday, at around 1pm UK time I purchased the upgrade from Creative Suite Design Premium 4 to Creative Suite Design Premium 5.5. I logged onto the Adobe.com store, looked at the options - Home and Home Business, Small and Medium Business, Eductation and selected Small and Medium Business (because that is what we are). I purchased the upgrade (as a download), received a confirmation email from Adobe and waited....and waited...and waited. At the end of the day I called Adobe Custopmer support and asked why I have not had any email showing links to download sites, and serial numbers. I was told it can take 24 hrs to process the order.
Well here we are over 24 hrs later and I have still not had any information from Adobe. I tried calling the customer support and it is only open between 9am and 5pm Monday to Friday. The customer support website is down. The Adobe Volume Licensing site is down - and was all day yesterday as well.
In the meantime I have no way of opening the files. My deadline is Wednesday and we had planned to work on the job today and tomorrow (which is why I am sitting in my office now). It appears I cannot access customer support before Monday morning, and the customer support website is down until tomorrow evening UK time - at least. This means working all night on Monday and probably Tuesday - assuming we get access to the download information early Monday.
Adobe is one of the biggest software vendors in the world. When I buy software - online and for download, with a credit card - I expect to be able to access the software immediately. There is no excuse for this delay. None. A business the size of Adobe should not have customer services down for 2 days. Support should run 24/7, 365 days a year. My enquiry yesterday was routed to an offshore call centre, so having a 9 to 5 cut off is simply ridiculous.
The simple fact is that even the smallest software vendors we buy from deliver the goods within minutes. As you can tell I am mightily "annoyed" by this. At this point in time I am wishing these files were in Quark Xpress format (we have both). Quark used to have terrible support but they are now very good - and available.
As a customer of Adobe for over 15 years I am disappointed. Today, in my email inbox I have emails from Adobe about new online cloud services. Well, why would I want to invest any more in Adobe software if I cannot even access the ones I have bought - quickly?
If companies like Adobe want to know why piracy is rife - look at your own delivery systems. The only option I have now to do this job is to either download a pirated version (which I will not) or to download and run the trial for Indesign. How stupid is that?
Apologies for the rant.

ProDesignTools wrote:
Kevin Quigley wrote:
... selected Small and Medium Business (because that is what we are). I purchased the upgrade (as a download), ...
Well here we are over 24 hrs later and I have still not had any information from Adobe. ...
In the meantime I have no way of opening the files. My deadline is Wednesday ...
Hi Kevin, not sure why it's taken longer than usual, but you can just download the free trial in the meantime. It will work 100% for 30 days, and you can convert it over to the full version once you receive your permanent serial number without reinstalling. This is fine even with a business license.
There's really no reason not to proceed in this fashion, especially with an imminent deadline. Adobe recommends this in cases where there is any sort of delay (for example, student validation) or immediate need. And absolutely you should avoid downloading the software from anywhere else, which is not only illegal but also hazardous to the health of your computer (malware).
Hope this helps!
Acrobat has never had a Trial for Mac. Probably never will.

Indexing and categorization takes too long - why?

I have set up a news publishing system where journalists access a folder and publish their news there using an xml form. So far so good.
Readers of the news access a page with a km-navigation iview that points to a taxonomy folder. The query based taxonomy is set up to categorize news based on property-values chosen by the journalist in the xml-form. This also works as supposed.
Lifetime (time based publishing) is activated for the folder the journalists access to publish their news. Corresponding start and end dates/times for setting lifetime for an article is set by the journalists. This also works as supposed.
BUT: after saving each article the system takes awfully long to actually categorize the news and thereby make the articles visible for others than the journalists. It might be as long as half an hour or so. This also repeats itself every time an article is edited.
I also feel that basic indexing of all other documents in the portal takes too long. I want all new documents to be indexed as soon as they're saved.
Any tips?
Henning

I have set up a news publishing system where journalists access a folder and publish their news there using an xml form. So far so good.
Readers of the news access a page with a km-navigation iview that points to a taxonomy folder. The query based taxonomy is set up to categorize news based on property-values chosen by the journalist in the xml-form. This also works as supposed.
Lifetime (time based publishing) is activated for the folder the journalists access to publish their news. Corresponding start and end dates/times for setting lifetime for an article is set by the journalists. This also works as supposed.
BUT: after saving each article the system takes awfully long to actually categorize the news and thereby make the articles visible for others than the journalists. It might be as long as half an hour or so. This also repeats itself every time an article is edited.
I also feel that basic indexing of all other documents in the portal takes too long. I want all new documents to be indexed as soon as they're saved.
Any tips?
Henning

Interactive form takes very long to load

Hi Gurus,
I have developed an interactive form with several Dropdowns and text fields. I am using WebDynPro ActiveX drop down and binded it to context which is of SimpleType and populated from backend. My form is taking very long to load and once I save it locally the also it takes too long to open.
Below is the config used:
- Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0
- Adobe Lifecycle Designer 7
- NWDS 7.0.14
- xACF ver 711_0
- J2EE server 2004s SP12
Previously I was using WDP Native Dropdowns and popuulated then without simple type, that time form was loading finely (in 10 sec).
Please help me out in resolving this issue.
Regards,
Arafat

Dear Arafat,
Have you resolved it?
I met the same problem with you.
If you had resolved, please help me.
Regards,
Jiandong

Web application deployment takes too long?

Hi All,
We have a wls 10.3.5 clustering environment with one admin server and two managered servers separately. When we try to deploy a sizable web application, it takes about 1 hour to finish. It seems that it takes too long to finish the deployment. Here is the output from one of two managerd server system log. Could anyone tell me it is normal or not? If not, how can I improve this?
Thanks in advance,
John
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:03 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535463373> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:05 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <9baa7a67b5727417:26f76f6c:135ca05cff2:-8000-00000000000000b0> <1330535465664> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442300> <BEA-320143> <Scheduled 1 data retirement tasks as per configuration.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive HarvestedDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive HarvestedDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive EventsDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive EventsDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:23 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <weblogic.cluster.MessageReceiver> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539023098> <BEA-003107> <Lost 2 unicast message(s).>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:36 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539036105> <BEA-000111> <Adding Pinellas1tMS2 with ID -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 to cluster: Pinellas1tCluster1 view.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084375> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084507> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:36 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:37 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:38 AM

Hi John,
There may be some circumstances like when there are many files in the WEB-INF folder and JPS don't use TLD.
I don't think a 1hour deployment is normal, it should be much more faster.
Since you are using 10.3.5, I suggesto you to install the corresponding patch:
1. Download patch 10118941p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
2. Uncompress the file p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
3. Copy the required files (patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml, CIRF.jar ) to the Patch Download Directory (typically, this folder is <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/cache_dir).
4. Rename the file patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml into patch-catalog.xml .
5. Start Smart Update from <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/bsu.sh .
6. Select "Work Offline" mode.
7. Go to File->Preferences, and select "Patch Download Directory".
8. Click "Manage Patches" on the right panel.
9. You will see the patch in the panel below (Downloaded Patches)
10. Click "Apply button" of the downloaded patch to apply it to the target installation and follow the instructions on the screen.
11. Add "-Dweblogic.jsp.ignoreTLDsProcessingInWebApp=true" to the Java options to ignore additional findTLDs cost.
12. Restart servers.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Cris

OIM11g managed server startup takes too long

I am running a OIM11g managed server using weblogic on windows xp; in development mode
My managed server takes too long to startup; averaging atleast an hour at the minimum.
I am attaching the logs from the server between the time frame when it took the longest time.
Can someone please help me to improve the startup.
Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

<9:32:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-ejb.jar>
<9:45:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '23' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<9:45:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:00:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:00:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:15:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:15:41 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:30:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '19' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:30:15 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:33:08 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'dataobjects-ejb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:33:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: dataobjects-ejb.jar>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:38:11 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:38:11 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-async-mdb.jar>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module xlWebApp of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'xlWebApp.war' with uri, 'WEB-INF/web.xml'. The plan was merged.>
Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

OPM process execution process parameters takes too long time to complete

PROCESS_PARAMETERS are inserted every 15 min. using gme_api_pub packages. some times it takes too long time to complete the batch ,ie completion of request. it takes about 5-6 hrs long time ,in other time s it takes only 15-20 mins.This happens at regular interval...if anybody can guide me I will be thankful to him/her..
thanks in advance.
regds,
Shailesh

Generally the slowest part of the process is in the extraction itself...
Check in your source system and see how long the processes are taking, if there are delays, locks or dumps in the database... If your source is R/3 or ECC transactions like SM37, SM21, ST22 can help monitor this activity...
Consider running less processes in parallel if you have too many and see some delays in jobs... Also indexing some of the tables in the source system to expedite the extraction, make sure there are no heavy processes or interfaces running in the source system at the same time you're trying to load... Check with your Basis guys for activity peaks and plan accordingly...
In BW also check in your SM21 for database errors or delays...
Just some ideas...

RPURMP00 program takes too long

Hi Guys,
Need some help on this one guys. Not getting any where with this issue.
I am running RPURMP00 ( Program to Create Third-Party Remittance Posting Run ) and while running it in test mode for 1 employee it takes too long .
I ran this in background during off hours , but it takes 19,000 + sec to run and then cancels .
The long text message is No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO (Remittance detail table for all entities) for key 0002485844    and     Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE
I check the program and I found a nested loop within the program (include RPURMP02 ) and decided to debug it with a break point.
It short dumped and here is the st22 message and source code extract.
      ----Message -
" Time limit exceeded ".
"The program "RPURMP00" has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime without
Interruption and has therefore been terminated."
      ----Source code extract -
Include RPURMP02
172 &----
173 *&      Form get_advice_info
174 &----
175 *       text
176 ----
177 * --> p1        text
178 * <-- p2        text
179 ----
180 FORM get_advice_info .
181
182 * get information for advice form only if vendor sub-group and
183 * employee detail is maintained
184   IF ( NOT t51rh-lifsg IS INITIAL ) AND
185      ( NOT t51rh-hrper IS INITIAL ).
186
187 *   get remittance items employee number
188     SELECT * FROM t51r4 WHERE remky = t51r5-remky. "#EC CI_GENBUFF "SAM0632658
189 *     get payroll seqno determined by PERNR and RDATN
>>>>>       SELECT * FROM t51r8 WHERE pernr = t51r4-pernr
191                             AND rdatn = t51r5-rdatn
192                             ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY. "#EC CI_GENBUFF
193         EXIT.
194       ENDSELECT.
Has anyone ever come across this situation? Any input from anyone on this?
Regards.
CJ

Hi,
What is your SAP version?
Have you checked if some OSS notes is there on performance.
Regards,
Atish

Quantity conversion takes too long

Dear Gurus,
I'm having a problem with the query execution time when I convert the quantities of the materials in KGs.
I have done all the steps to set up material conversion with reference infoobject 0material and using a dynamic determination of conversion factor using central units of measurement (T006) otherwise reference infoobject.
With these settings the query takes too long to execute because of the large number of material codes. If I remove this conversion the query is executed very fast.
Any ideas? Do I have to create an index in UOM0MATE ODS? What am I missing here?
Regards,
Panos

Hi Panos,
I had the same issue, but it's solved for me now. I tried the same way you did, by creating a secondary index on the active table of the DSO. The only difference is, that I included all the SID fields to the index.
Did you mark your index as unique? Also make sure, that the index really is created on the DB.
If the performance still is not getting better, check in RSRT the statistics if the unit conversion really is the problem.
Kindly regards,
Matthias

Business Rules Project Takes Too Long to Open

Does anyone know why it takes too long (~3-5 minutes) to open/edit a security project definded for assigning business rules to planning application forms? We are using Hyperion v11.1.1.3.0. Essbase is on Windows server, Shared Services on Solaris 10 Unix. Even before we migrated Essbase to Windows to gain better performance running calcs, opening projects using EAS has always been very slow to open. Please advice if there is a way to improve performance on this.

Clear Cookies & Cache
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Template:clearCookiesCache
Clear the Network Cache
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/How%20to%20clear%20the%20cache#w_clear-the-cache
Firefox takes a long time to start up
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/firefox-takes-long-time-start-up
Check and tell if its working.

I am looking for a way to enter multiple dates into a field without the form becoming too long.

I am looking for a way to enter multiple dates into a field without the form becoming too long.
This will be used by an old school bookeeper who needs the form to fit on one page.
Any ideas?

Hi,
If you don't need the field to provide a date picker, verify it's a date, or don't need to sort the dates in the table, you can just use a text area field, and have your form filler enter the dates comma separated. Otherwise you'd have to add multiple fields. However, you can lessen the space each field takes up veritically, by using the "Labels Left" option (in the toolbar).
Thanks,
Todd

Muse CC startup takes too long (up to 35 seconds)

For some reason, Muse CC takes too long to launch: up to 35 seconds. The splash screen stays up for that long until the program actually starts.
Photoshop CC, with several plug-ins and presets, takes only 3 seconds. My previous Muse versions launched a lot faster.
I'm on Windows 7, 64 bit. Any recommendations on this? Anybody else experiencing this issue?

Please try to clear Muse's preferences/cache as detailed in the following article and see if that helps.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5086018#5086018
Thanks,
Vinayak

Sometimes my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I am running a pretty powerful work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network, is it a hard drive issue? do I need to "clean out" the computer?

Many times my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I have wireless internet (time capsule) and I am running a pretty powerful real time financial work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network? is it a hard drive issue? do I only need to "clean out" the computer? Or all of the above...not to computer saavy. It is a Macbook Pro osx 10.6.8 (late 2010).

Almost certainly none of the above! Try each of the following in this order:
Select 'Reset Safari' from the Safari menu.
Close down Safari; move <home>/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db to the trash; restart Safari.
Change the DNS servers in your network settings to use the OpenDNS servers: 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220
Turn off DNS pre-fetching by entering the following command in Terminal and restarting Safari:
defaults write com.apple.safari WebKitDNSPrefetchingEnabled -boolean false

Accessing BKPF table takes too long

Hi,
Is there another way to have a faster and more optimized sql query that will access the table BKPF? Or other smaller tables that contain the same data?
I'm using this:
   select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart
   into corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
   from bkpf
   where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
   and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
   and blart in so_DocTypes
   and monat in so_monat.
The report is taking too long and is eating up a lot of resources.
Any helpful advice is highly appreciated. Thanks!

Hi max,
I also tried using BUDAT in the where clause of my sql statement, but even that takes too long.
    select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat in so_budat.
I also tried accessing the table per day, but it didn't worked too...
   while so_budat-low le so_budat-high.
     select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat eq so_budat-low.
     so_budat-low = so_budat-low + 1.
   endwhile.
I think our BKPF tables contains a very large set of data. Is there any other table besides BKPF where we could get all accounting document numbers in a given period?

Activation of Adobe Form takes too long / XML problem?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for