Adding a boarder to an exported image

Hi....
Would like to be able to export an image to a given pixel size and add a boarder to the image, I know you can do this via the print module but I can’t find a way of setting a size in pixels.
Nick

That's not a possibility in this beta, however you might find this plug-in useful: http://www.photographers-toolbox.com/products/lrmogrify2.php It'll allow you to set the size in pixels using the export dialog and add borders of your choice.

Similar Messages

Adding and /exporting/ image with Metadata problem

i have been able to add metadata to an image i need to publish but for some reason i am having a problem figuring out how to export this metada with the image.
i see i have an option to export as original or as version. does this affect whether metada has been exported?
also, can i export as PNG as get the metadata in the image or do i have to use something like jpg for some reason?
finally, is there a way to verify that the metadata has been exported along with the image to my desktop before i upload to the web?! it seems really sort of odd to have to re-import the image into Aperture to test the exported image to see if the metadata is there. i mean, i am glad i just did this with the image and metadata that i exported b/c the metadata is not there but it seems like this could be simpler.
TIA

What export preset are you using? Did you check the box to include metadata. This is all in the manual. PNG has poor support for metadata so you're best sticking to Jpeg. You can check for the metadata in Preview, or an of a 100 other photo apps.
Regards
TD

Image in Lightroom doesn't match exported image viewed in Photoshop

After all my hard work in Lightroom, I export the image to a folder on my hard drive. When I open this exported image in Photoshop and view it alongside the Lightroom version of its "twin" in Lightroom, there is a significant difference. Why is this? I want to use these images in my books, but my time is wasted if I end up with anything other than what I created in Lightroom. Shouldn't these images match exactly?

Thanks Jao and Michael...the color management idea makes a lot of sense.
Adding to this idea, when I open the Pshop file I get a message about the doc having an embedded profile that doesn't match current RGB working space, and the usual 3 options: Use the embedded profile, Convert color to the working space, or discard embedded profile. No matter which option I choose, none of the opened docs match the Lightroom version.
The color balance is fine, but the colors aren't as vibrant. The Pshop photo is dull and lifeless compared to the Lightroom version. I used Clarity which added subtle brightness, and Vibrance to crank up the color in LR which added wonderful dimensionality and punch to the landscape scene, but the Pshop version has dulled these back down.

Why are most of my keywords not included when I export images?

Why are most of my keywords not included when I export images?
Since starting with Lightroom 1, I've entered keywords into either of the two fields between "keyword tags" and "keyword suggestions" in the keywording panel. I was unaware that some keywords are more equal than others, or that Lightroom offered (or has added?) hierarchy support.
I recently stumbled into the news (to me) that Lightroom tags can be organized into a hierarchy, so I exported my keywords to a text file to examine. I hadn't unwittingly created any hierarchies, but an astounding fraction of the keywords were within square brackets. Sure enough, if I export an image, keywords within square brackets are omitted from the output (jpeg) file. How nice. Since I began with Lightroom 1, I've added nearly 1600 keywords.. Too bad most of them are coded wrong... so as not to accompany output that I create.
1.     What was I supposed to do, as a photographer beginning to use Lightroom, to enter keywords simply but reliably: what I type is what I get? I'd expected that's what the "just type here" interface would provide.
I especially dislike obtaining erratic results: most keywords are in square brackets, but a few are not. Of course, when I use a simplified interface, I should expect not to have access to some of the options or features. However, I shouldn't inadvertently trigger undocumented behavior.
2.     Does the Adobe reference help system say how to enter keywords simply and reliably, in its documentation of the keywording panel? I don't find my answer under the Keywords topic, within Home / Using Photoshop Lightroom 3 / Organizing photos in the catalog.
(I NOW realize that the instructions for the "Create/Edit keyword tags" dialog mention exporting. However, that's not the method I was using.)
Dick Rawson

I'm afraid that I distracted you with my background mention of hierarcharial keywords; I'm not asking about them.
I've entered keywords for several years of using Lightroom. Suddenly, this week, I find that most (yet not all) of them have the attribute of "don't include the keyword in an exported file's metadata." I never intended to ask for that; I thought all keywords will stay with the file and its offspring, and that's what I wanted.
So I'm asking:
1.     What did I do "wrong" to induce Lightroom to give the keywords that attribute? I never intended to ask it to.
2.     Where does Adobe document how to enter keywords reliably so that they stay with the file on output? I can't find that Adobe does.
> Can you be more clear about keywords in square brackets? I know when you export the keywords as a list you can get a normalized data file that uses punctuation and tabs as delimiters...
I did export the keywords into such a list: most keywords in the plain-text list have square brackets surrounding them, indicating keywords that will be omitted from metadata of any image that Lightroom exports.
My concern is not that the brackets are there. They encode the attribute of "don't include the keyword in an exported file's metadata," and recognizing that attribute concerns me.
> ...but I've never seen keywords in image files or in the interface rendered so.
I haven't, either.
Dick Rawson

Keynote export images

Keynote Version 6 exports images in nice form, but does not allow you to output only chosen slides. It creates images for every slide!
It lets you pick slides 4 and 5 for example, but will send out an image for every slide you have, whether you have 5 or 500!
Just one of those little things that were not "finished" in the new version.

An alternative to deleting the slides you don't want exported in Keynote 6.0.1, you can "skip" the slides within the document and only the "un-skipped" slides will have their images exported. Undo the "skip" after exporting the images to return your document to its presentation state.
Skip Slide is available in the Slide menu, or with a command-shift-H, or can be added to your toolbar through "customize toolbar".
If the document has a number of skipped slides you don't want to change, you can duplicate the document and either use Gary Scotland's delete unwanted slides, or use this skip process.
And, let's hope the next update comes out soon and renders this workaround unnecessary.

Export image EMF from tab control, help!!

Hello,
I am trying to get a good resolution report. I got use export image to EMF file so the graphs look very good resolution. When I appended the image control like png it looked poor quality. Now is ok, now I export image of graphs to emf and then use 'append image to report' using the path of file emf.
But I have a problem in this case. I am trying to get EMF file from Tab control. I have 8 graphs inside of each page of tab control. I would like to get each page exporting to EMF file and later append the image to report from path of file. The problem is I cant export to emf. I tried the solution in this treads.
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/send-control-image-programmatically-to-clipboard/td-p/180921/page/2
But it uses get image and it is bmp, so no good solution.
I attached pdf file. IT shows the tab control with append control to report (it is like capture in png file) and one graph append control to report png and emf file of another graph and use the path to input in word report. You can see the diference.
I would like to know if i could export the tab control to emf or any onther vectorial image and later use the path. SInce it will take several pages and i will need sometimes 300-400 graphs...
Any idea would be great.
Best Regards.
Attachments:
z-capture.png ‏34 KB
Report22.pdf ‏212 KB

Hi Mike,
Thanks for your reply!.
Well, it was only one example. Check the attached file. It works ok. I split in dataset of 8sec and save the emf files.
The problem is the report. If I enable it doestnt works fine, since you will be the both parts working in the same time.
That's why the sequence structure would be ok, one time all the graphs are saved then I could append to report.
I have another question. I used transparent graph and it works ok. I remove all the scales Y values or labels and customized the graph adding one horinzontal line for X scale (like capture), but in the file emf saved didnt appear. Do you know why?.
Best Regards, Fred.
Attachments:
z-capture1.png ‏31 KB
z-capture2.png ‏16 KB
Report1.pdf ‏267 KB

XY graph export image JPEG color PB

Dear.
How save a graph in JPEG with a simplified presentation and keep the line color on the picture like "Invoke node: Export images" .
To have JPEG image I used the "invoke node: get image" and I put a 1 on the color to simplified the presentation but it's don't keep the line color.
I have seen this post who speek about this subject:
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=122665&query.id=182247#M122665
In the zip there is a the project to show the difference between the tow "invoke node"
I someome can help me..
Massif
Attachments:
image simplified JPEG.zip ‏77 KB

Hi Massif,
if you set the picture depth to 1 you can´t have any color in it. Use 24 bit and change the background color. Or another solution, save your picture as bitmap, open it and save it as jpg. See the attached example.
Mike
Message Edited by MikeS81 on 04-21-2008 09:52 AM
Attachments:
image JPEG juste line color_LV80.vi ‏26 KB

GPU acceleration not working when exporting images on Lightroom CC

I was monitoring CPU & GPU while exporting a timelapse sequence:
As you can see, GPU is idle when exporting images - CPU does all the work. So GPU is used only when moving the sliders in the Develop module for a fast preview of an image you are working on, but for export it isn't used.
What's your opinion? I'd like to have exports accelerated too. I was hoping for it. Exporting timelapses is really time consuming.
Adobe pls?

I couldn't find the Cuda-Supported-Cards.txt file at first, didn't know about right-click .app file "show package contents", but then found it. I also searched for the hack and some people said delete the file, others said add your Graphics cards to the file, others said add your graphics card to the the Opencl_supported_cards.txt file. I added my card to the Cuda-Supported-Cards.txt first, and it didn't work. I left the graphics card in that file, but also added it to the Opencl_supported_cards.txt file and now it works. Thanks so much.

Lightroom 5.3 bug with export images

Hi,
I can't export single images in Lightroom anymore. When I choose an image including the watermark the system exports all the latest imported images, but not a single one. Can anyone help me with that?
-jo

in your lr5.2, click help>updates...
bug fixes:
Issues when upgrading catalog from previous versions of Lightroom.
Incorrect photos are displayed after switching away from a Publish Collection.
Catalog optimization did not finish, and was not optimizing the catalog
Feather of clone spots is set to 0 after upgrading catalog to Lightroom 5.
Auto White Balance settings are not saved to Snapshots.
Sony 18-55mm lens is detected as the Hasselblad 18-55mm lens for lens correction.
Increased Update Spot Removal history steps when in Before and After view.
Slideshows start playing automatically even when the Manual Slideshow option is enabled.
Video playback stops when dragging on the scrubber.
Errors when publishing photos to Flickr through the Publish Service.
Option + drag on Edit Pin behavior is functioning incorrectly.
Black border appears around the exported slideshow video.
Catalog containing images processed with PV2003 were adding a post-crop vignette when catalog upgraded to Lightroom 5.
Pressing the “Reset” button while holding down the Shift key caused Lightroom to exit abruptly.
Output Sharpening and Noise Reduction were not applied to exported images that were resized to less than 1/3 of the original image size.
The Esc key did not exit the slideshow after right clicking screen with mouse during slideshow playing.
Import dialog remained blank for folders that contain PNG files with XMP sidecars.
Metadata panel displayed incorrect information after modifying published photo. Please note that this only occurred when metadata was changed after the photo was published.

I use Adobe lightroom to export images to Facebook - I am now getting error message related to this process address not understood- how to correct?

I am using Win & Home edition / Mozilla Firefox on my HP laptop. On Oct 8 I used Lightroom to export images to Facebook. Now when I try to repeat this, authentication fails as The address wasn't understood
Firefox doesn't know how to open this address, because one of the following protocols (lightroom) isn't associated with any program or is not allowed in this context.
The export process was working, but isn't now. I have ben having problems with Firefox - I wasn't able to retain the settings for opening with my own Homepage (kept going back to Firefox default. So I have done a reset. Seems that this has somehow disrupted the authentication process. Can you help please.

I just dropped into the forums to see if other people were getting the DVD burning verification error (Error code 0x80020063). I've been holding off on the Tiger to Leopard upgrade until very recently. All of my must-have apps were anecdotally stable and I was under the impression that 10.5 was too. Apparently reliable DVD burning is Tiger only, at least on my systems.
We've been burning Taiyo Yuden DVD's almost daily with Tiger with incredibly low failure rates. After what seemed to be a smooth upgrade of a Mac Pro tower & 2 MacBook Pro laptops (one is a Core Duo and the other is a Core 2 Duo) I've spent the entire afternoon troubleshooting until I ended up here. Some searching on the board leads me to conclude that this will be a bigger headache than I imagined.
I've done all the obvious stuff (varied the burn speed, moved the files to a different drive, reset PRAM & SMC, used a different account, deleted finder.plist, tried repairing the system with DU on the Leopard install disc and then I tried burning on different computers with different media). What I'm finding is that over 50% of my DVD's are throwing the error code during verification across 3 different models all running Leopard 10.5.2. CD burning seems to work as before (but we don't use this as much so ?). I saw that some people had posted that closing the finder window helped, but that didn't improve my overall failure rate. The DVD's appear (indentical byte size and item numbers) to be burned correctly and usable, but I need to be sure so I can't trust them.
We need reliable DVD burning for our business and this is a real problem. I was going to trudge over to the Apple store, but it doesn't sound like there's a real fix yet.

Adobe Fireworks CS5: A way to change an existing slideshow export image width and height?

I have an existing slide show with 8 albums with numerous images in each. They have all been carefully labeled and sorted and placed.
The export image size was set, at one time, to 800 x 600 and everything displayed splendedly..
After just adding another album, all of a sudden, the images are displayed as 320 x 240. I have not idea why this is and I can't seem to figure out how to change this without creating the entire slideshow from scratch because the fields for the image size are greyed out...
Can someone please let me know where I would find this knowledge? I'm not very well versed in webdesign and only have this site and gallery using dreamwaever and fireworks through brute force...
Very appreciative of any help!

Hi blabla12345,
(untested and without warranty)
replace this line:
const sSaveCUBE = "CUBE";
with this:
const sSaveCUBE = "cube";
Have fun

D800 ISO noise on Aperture exported images

There has been some discussion on other boards that downsizing D800 images shot at high iso (3200-6400) to the size equivalent to 16 MP reduces the perception of noise such that the ISO performance of the D800 is similar to the D4 at same sized images. The downsizing, as best I can tell, was done in PS.
So I am wondering if any of you early D800 owners have looked at the effect of downsizing the image during export to a JPEG in terms of ISO. If the same improvement occurs during the export process as when it is done within PS, then that would be great since it is JPEG images I usually provide to clients or upload.
Also does anyone have metrics on import and export speeds of D800 files?

I initially felt that my 5D images were better. On the 1D3 there is a custom function II-2 that turns on high iso reduction (even in RAW). Without this on, the 1D3 is using the older DIGIC-II processing, with it on it uses the newer DIGIC-III processing. With this on I think it makes them as good or slightly better than the 5D (although with less pixels). However, Lightroom makes things look even better.
Here's a 100% crop from a low-light photo from Aperture:
http://caslis.com/tests/483I0673-ap-crop.jpg
Here's the same crop from Lightroom:
http://caslis.com/tests/483I0673-lr-crop.jpg
Of the images I tried this one image was the closest in both. In most cases Lightroom has far better. Even in this one, the Lightroom version looks better to me. Both programs had NR off and use the same RAW image.

Hide grid secondary axes export image

Hi there,
I'm trying to export some simplified images from graphs, with the grid hidden since it tends to make things look messy. The thing is, when there are multiple y-axes this option seems to be ignored on the second axis. Does anyone have any idea how to get around this?
Thanks!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Matt,
Yep, using a property node to select the ActiveYScale, then subsequent properties of that scale should be the way to refer to each of them. The order is easy enough to determine from the order they were added or by name in the graph properties. It's the same method I use to programmatically set scale names, plot names, which Y axis to use for each plot and so-on. Takes a little bit more work (and space) than the standard invoke node though!
Thanks again,
Regards
Attachments:
export image hide grids.vi ‏67 KB

Exporting Images to a folder on the hard drive

I used to be able to export images to a selected folder on my hard-drive without having to identify the folder for every image.
Now when I export I need to select the folder on my hard-drive for each image even thought I'm going to process 50+ images for that folder.
What is wrong & how can i fix it?
Can anyone help?
I'm using Lightroom 5.

Thanks for the quick reply.
I just tried it again and it seems to be working....
If it happens again, will use export with previous.
I was exporting the normal way through the library but my sub-folder was on my hard-drive.
ChrystiaC
www.chrystiachudczak.com

Exporting Images and Clipping Paths

I ran into a problem exporting images the was previously reported by Ruvan Fernando on Jan 25, 2006, but nobody had responded, so I'm trying again...
I'm using the SDK to open images and then save them back out with different colorspaces, resolution, etc. When I have an image that has a clipping path in it, when it's saved, the clipping path is missing.
I am copying all the source image attributes to the destination image attributes.
Any help would be appreciated.

I tried dragging it, and it gave the original version.
At Share there are; Print, Email, Desktop, HomePage, .Mac Slides, Order prints, Send to iDVD, Burn Disk, Export
I tried Desktop and it put the current image do my wallpaper.

Adding a boarder to an exported image

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for