Adding custom message in exception list of F110 transaction without adding payment block

Hi All,
My requirement is to add custom message in exception list of F110 transaction based on certain fields validation without adding payment block .
I tried using BTE 1820 where I can add my validation but am not able to add the custom message in exception list.
Thanks,
Mihika.

Hi Raymond,
Thanks for your reply.
I did checked the document and tried giving the S and I message in my BTE with trace option checked on Additional log screen.
But Success and information message doesn't showed in Exception List.
If I set the Error message the Proposal gets cancelled and I can see my error message in log. (We don't want this option as in this option proposal is not getting created)
If I set the Payment block I can see that logged in exception list. But we don't want to set the payment block but the message should appear in exception list.
I added the message using simple message statement. Will you please advice if any other way to add the message other than using the MESSAFE statement.
Thanks,
Mihika.

Similar Messages

Special G/L transaction which only appears on the exceptions list in F110

Hi All,
While run payment program by F110 for some of the documents are getting not posted due to the error log 017-Special G/L transaction which only appears on the exceptions list. Can anyone tell me to remove the error log and post the same.
Thanks...

Dear
As Xing said,kindly reomve the Sp G/L indicator assigned in Vendor tab (Sp. G/L transactions for exceptions list) in FBZP > All Company Code and select your company code and assign them in "Sp. G/L transactions to be paid" in vendor tab and try to run F110.
Try it,it will work.
Do revert for any further help.
Regards,

ABAP dump in ecc 6.0 for F110 transaction

HI All,
We have recently upgraded to ECC 6.0 from 4.6C.
While displaying the proposal/exception list using F110 transaction for the program RFZALI20. The ABAP dump says "Unable to interpret "1 5D " as a number". It is failing for Key for print parameters (PRI_PARAMS-PRKEYEXT).
Has anyone faced this issue?
Thanks in advance.
-APK

HI Balaji,
We could get over this issue by changing the print parameters in the variant we have used.
The variant had some print parameters selected (having green check) even though there are no parameters which are selected. So, I have created a varaint without the print parameters option checked (no more green check in the extended selection).
Hope this is clear.
-Pradeep

How to handle ADF_FACES Errors/Exceptions and display customized message.

Hi All,
My question here is, 
Is there any way to handle the validation/PPR kind of run time exceptions/errors. I have tried to handle these errors by extending the lifecycle and overridden the reportErrors method. But this method is being called in the PREPARE_RENDER phase. But the exception is happening in the JSF_PROCESS_VALIDATIONS phase. I have tried to handle the exceptions in the custom PagePhaseListener. But these exceptions could not be handled in the custom PagePhaseListener.
I would like to display a customized message to the user instead of displaying the PPR exception.
The details are given below.
I have a use case related to the security like if there is a drop down list in a page. Drop down list is having a af:validateRegExp component which allows only alphabets. Dropdown is populating alphanumeric values.
One option is selected in the drop down list and submitted the value with the help of the commondbutton.
With the help of some tools, we modified the submitted value(index of the list submitted) to some alphabets.
Its throwing some validation exception. Some of the statements are given below.
<UIXRegion> <_warn> Error processing viewId: /Validate_TF/validate URI: /validate.jsff actual-URI: /validate.jsff.
java.lang.NumberFormatException: ADF_FACES-60034:SelectOne could not convert index 0asd
<LifecycleImpl> <_handleException> ADF_FACES-60098:Faces lifecycle receives unhandled exceptions in phase PROCESS_VALIDATIONS 3
<RegistrationConfigurator> <handleError> ADF_FACES-60096:Server Exception during PPR
displaying a popup dialog with error message like:
ADF_FACES_60034:could not convert index
ADF_FACES_60097:server exception
ADF_FACES_60096: some exception occurred during PPR,
I don't want to show these kind of messages to user. Please suggest me whether is it possible or not.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
SatishRaj Dasari.

Hi,
Try reading one of Franks post :
[url https://blogs.oracle.com/jdevotnharvest/entry/extending_the_adf_controller_exception_handler]
Nigel

Custom message on list view in SharePoint 2013

Hi,
I have created a list with multiple view and i set the target audience for each view.I set the views for each dept.So when a person not belongs to the corresponding group click on the other view,he will get a custom message like " you are not authorized
member for this view".
Can you help me to figure out this?
Thank you

Hi Aditi,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to display custom error message when a user who does not belong to the corresponding group clicks the view.
Per my knowledge, the view will not be available if the target audience is set for the view and the user does not have permission to access the view.
If the target audience is set based on the groups, then the user who does not belong to the group will not have the permission to see the view on the view menu, and he will not be able to click the view.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Exclude specific errors in exception list in the proposal list display F110

Hi,
When we execute proposal run and download the proposal list item, it is showing all items including exception list item. But we want to exclude a particular exception with error code 016 (Pmnt methods for this run are not specified in master record or in item).
Here we want to execute a particular set of vendors with specific payment method in their master data. But while giving parameters in F110, we are selecting range of vendors like 1 to 999999. The remaining vendors are coming in exception list with error code 016.
Since our specific vendors will be changing from time to time, we cannot take those set of vendors in parameters. Please suggest is there any way we can exclude exception with particular error code to be excluded from proposal list.
Regards
Suresh

hi Dasa,
probably there is not enough money on the bank account. But if you read the log of the proposal run, you'll get a clear picture, what is wrong.
ec

Different Exception messages in MRP list & Stock Requirement List

Hello Experts,
When I run MRP and then look at the stock Requirement List & MRP list for the same material, I see different exception messages in these list.
I noticed that any of the exception messages in Exception group "7 - Exception during rescheduling" (ie, 10-reschedule in; 15-Reschedule Out; 20-cancel process; 30-plan process according to schedule) is not appearing in the stock requirement list even though they appear in the MRP list.
Does any configuration affect what message group can appear in Stock Requirement List & MRP list?
Please advice.
Regards
Tom

Hi Tom,
For exception message - 62, just do the below checks -
Some of the reasons as to why you may find this exception message is because the backward scheduling can drive the start date in the past so far that:
- there is no valid BOM as of that date
- one or more of the work centers are not valid on that date
- there is no valid factory calendar on that date
Check the scheduling formulas in your work centers that are set up, and/or to specify for the material master a fixed lot or a max lot size so that planned orders result with realistic lot sizes.
Also you can set up MRP to only run on basic dates for your overall run, and to follow up with an MRP run which generates capacity planning only within the planning horizon, such as NETPL. You would need to configure the planning horizon so that it specifies a time frame over which capacity planning is to be done.
Also check the note : 88505 - Planned order upload generates exception message 62
In short, do a thorough check of the parameters maintained to ensure there is no inconsistency in the master data.
Check & revert.
Regards,
Vivek

Adding custom message on the login page

I have done the following to try and get a custom message to display on the oracle login page:
1:
In the System Administrator Responsibility, went into the System Profile Options and searched for "Local Login Mask" The default value was 32, I set it to 96. This was done because 64 is the number to display a "Corporate Policy Message" on the login page (32+64 = 96).
2:
Switched over to the Application Developer responsibility, and went to Application->Messages. Here I did a search for "FND_SSO_SARBANES_OXLEY_TEXT". A result came back with current message text: "Corporate Policy Message". I changed this to a test message and hit save.
3
Still in Application Developer responsibility, I went to Other->Requests->Run and chose "Generate Messages", for parameters I chose:
Language: US
Application: Application Object Library
Mode: DB_TO_RUNTIME
while leaving the others blank. I submitted this request and it completed normal.
4
I logged out of applications, closed my browser and cleared my cache. I went to login into the apps and at the login page... it does display "Corporate Policy Message" but it never updated it to my custom one.
Question: Do I need to restart the HTTP server or something to see the updated results? I am confused why it will display "Corporate Policy Message" but the value for FND_SSO_SARBANES_OXLEY_TEXT is clearly changed. Even when you go back into it and look.
The Generate Messages conc prog is a spawned process so I cant find out what its doing.
Any help would be loved!
OH PS
I know I started a previous thread on a similar topic, but the method has changed completely and I think it merits its own thread. My apologies if it shouldn't have been.

Hi;
What is your EBS and OS?Please check below thread
password-Lock User when enter password in wrong 3 times
Re: Lock User when enter password in wrong 3 times
Regard
Helios

DISPLAY ONLY CUSTOM MESSAGE WITH SRW.MESSAGE

Hi.I created a report with Report Builder 9i.I also created two form parameters of type date.I put inside the validation trigger in the property inspector the following plsql code.
function FROM_DATEValidTrigger return boolean is
v_date VARCHAR2(12);
date1 date;
begin
v_date := :from_date;
date1:=TO_DATE(v_date, 'DD/MM/YYYY');
return (TRUE);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
SRW.MESSAGE(546,'My Message');
return (FALSE);
end;
This code works fine.Supose the user input wrong data for example 29/02/2003 displays an alert message
with my custom message.But after this displays an another message from the Report Builder like this:
Rep-0546:Invalid parameter input.
My question is .Is it possible display only my custom message with the SRW.MESSAGE built in procedure?
Thanks in advance Panagiotis.

Hi,
I am using this function in my Validation process to display Error when user gives null input
function DEPT_IDValidTrigger return boolean is
begin
     -- Check for Null Value here
     if(:DEPT_ID is null) then
     raise SRW.NULL_ARGUMENTS;
     else
return true;
end if;
     Exception
          -- Exception For Null Value
when SRW.NULL_ARGUMENTS then
     srw.message(100, 'Please Enter Dept ID');
raise srw.program_abort;
end function ___ ;
Function is correct but the error message i am getting at the client side is as follows ::
"*MSG-00100: Please enter Dept IDREP-1419: 'dept_idvalidtrigger': PL/SQL program aborted.* "
It seems it is adding some system level error.
but i want only my custom message to be displayed on the client side ::
*"Please Enter Dept ID"*
Is this Possible in Oracle 6i.

How to give link between 2 customized layout in f110 transactions.

Hello Abapers,
I am developing customized layout for f110 transaction.I have developed layour for cheques as zcheques and for payment advice,i have developed layout as zpayadvice.When i am running f110 transaction..it is giving output of cheques only,it is not giving payment advice report.when I am using standard prenumbered cheques form and it is diplaying my customized layout of payment advice(zpayadvice)..this is my porblem..Is there any interlink between customized layouts in f110 transaction.how can i solve this problem.
This is very urgent for me.
waiting for ur favourable replies.
Regards
Maruthi.

The SelectOneChoice section is:
<af:selectOneChoice value="#{bindings.ProcessId1.inputValue}"
label="#{bindings.ProcessId1.label}"
autoSubmit="true" id="ProcList"
showRequired="true">
<f:selectItems value="#{bindings.ProcessId1.items}"/>
</af:selectOneChoice>
and the binding list:
<list StaticList="false" ListOperMode="0" IterBinding="NameViewIterator"
ListIter="ProcessListIterator" id="ProcessId1" NullValueFlag="1"
NullValueId="ProcessId1_null">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="ProcessId"/>
</AttrNames>
<ListAttrNames>
<Item Value="ProcessId"/>
</ListAttrNames>
<ListDisplayAttrNames>
<Item Value="ProcessName"/>
</ListDisplayAttrNames>
</list>
Do I need to change the format of SelectOneChoice to add "for each"?
Message was edited by:
[email protected]

ALLOWED Cookies Exception List does not retain entries from session to session.

YES, I've searched the KB for an answer...no joy. I want to manage my cookies by adding the few sites that I want to allow cookies for, with all other sites being denied, and me being prompted every time a site wants to dnld a cookie. I believe I understand all the available settings, but I can't bet FF to retain the list of allowed sites from session to session, and sometimes FF won't retain them even immediately after I save them. I never had a problem with FF3, but now I'm having this problem with FF4.

Issue unsolved. Hoping to receive deeper analysis.
Thank you cor-el, that's a good suggestion, but, something I already knew. I didn't execute Clear Recent History...Clear Recent History is NOT the cause of the problem.
Additional Information: In Options\Privacy\History my settings are: "Use custom settings for history", Permanent Private Browsing mode = ON, Accept cookies from sites = OFF. Should I expect to be able to click on the Exceptions button, and enter urls into the exceptions pop up window as ALLOW, and expect them to be there in subsequent FF sessions? I've noticed that the Exceptions pop up window does not have an "OK" button as I would expect from observed FF convention...should there be one? After entering a url, my only choice is a "Close" button or the Red "X".
Follow on question: Is it possible that a data error occurred during install, preventing an applet from loading correctly, which would prevent the retention of list entries into the permissions.sqlite file? My permissions.sqlite file is located where the KB says it should be, shows a size of 2K, and a Date Modified of today. Note: I have continued to try to enter and save urls into the Exceptions List with an ALLOW value with no success.
Or, perhaps I should migrate back to FF 3.xx?

Com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: java.lang.NullPointerException in sap pi

Hi all,
I am working on SAP PI 7.3.1 SP09. Currently we have interfaces which uses 50200 port. I have created a http destination from nwa pointing to https://....url. So all of a sudden all the interfaces went to error state. After debugging i found that the port 50200 is replaced with 50201which is https port. After changing the port to initial value ie., 50200 all interfaces are working fine except the one which were pointing to https url and they are showing the following error description.
<SAP:Error SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapterFramework</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MESSAGE">GENERAL</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: java.lang.NullPointerException</SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
The entire trace is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Determining the sender agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### DG: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### TO: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine/?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Request Line = POST /sap/xi/engine/?type=entry HTTP/1.0</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Host = 10.66.14.150:50200</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Server protocol = HTTP/1.0</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Remote address = 10.66.10.160</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">User = SFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Process ID: 760</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Work Process ID: 10</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message ID = 53BEFE7146893BD5E10000000A420AA0</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS">
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_EXT_PID: CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### DG: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### TO: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop engine name = is.02.devpipd1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop engine type = IS</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop adapter name = XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop adapter namespace = http://sap.com/xi/XI/System</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">No triggers found. OK.</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">system-ID = PD1</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">client = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">user = SFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ACL Check is performed</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XML validation is executed</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = BE</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">>>>PID delete old pid determination coding</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline-Elements for pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0001 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0002 PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0003 PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0004 PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0005 PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0006 PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0007 PLSRV_VIRUS_SCAN_RQ_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0008 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0009 PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0010 PLSRV_VIRUS_SCAN_RS_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0011 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RS_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0012 PLSRV_MAPPING_RESPONSE</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0013 PLSRV_VIRUS_SCAN_RS_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0014 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RS_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">system-ID = PD1</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">client = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">user = SFUSER</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MESSAGE_PERS_MAN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
<Trace level="2" type="T">Persisting original message</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 000</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA Begin of pipeline processing PLSRVID = CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB">
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA Start of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Calling pipeline service: PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Reading Pipeline-Service specification...</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">PLSRVTYPE =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">ADRESSMOD = LOCAL</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_CLASS = CL_XMS_PLSRV_VALIDATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_IFNAME = IF_XMS_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_METHOD = ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_VALIDATION-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline Service = PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Skip Inbound Validation =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Skip Outbound Validation =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Area = XML_VALIDATION_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Reading sender agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message does not contain a sender agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Inbound validation by Integration Engine does not take place</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA End of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MESSAGE_PERS_MAN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message after plsrv call</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA Start of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Calling pipeline service: PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T

HI,
Thank you for your hint. Maybe I just forgot to mention one important fact. We have second SAP Netweaver PI 7.1 which is completely our system. The first one I mentioned in first message is the customer's one. The one we have extra is also connected to MAXIMO and GIS. Settings of this interface is completely same among one thing:
Patch level of XIAF:
1. customers SAP PI level is
Adapter Common Library Version: 1.7.1007.20081105173106.0000, NW07_07_REL (2008-11-07T17:29:47+0000)
Adapter Application Version: 1.7.1007.20081105173106.0000, NW07_07_REL (2008-11-07T17:30:00+0000)
2. our SAP PI level is
Adapter Common Library Version: 1.7.1008.20100215155230.0000, NW07_08_REL (2010-02-15T17:19:21+0000)
Adapter Application Version: 1.7.1008.20100215155230.0000, NW07_08_REL (2010-02-15T17:19:31+0000)
Both of them has Axis Version: Apache Axis version: 1.4 Built on Apr 22, 2006 (06:55:48 PDT)
Also important to mention is fact that same problem happened in our SAP PI, but we implemented last patch of XIAF and it has suddenly started to work. I have suspicion it is somehow connected to this patch. Btw. this patch contains a lot of notes regarding AXIS framework (i.e. 1435998, 1150375, 1048268), so obviously some bugs of the AXIS adapter has been resolved by this patch.
What do you think ?
Thanks

Payment proposal Exception list - Add additional items to the exception lis

Hi,
We have a requirement to add additional vendor open items (having Bank type as ABC and Payment method as Y) to the Exception list of the payment proposal when we run F110. Along with other open items which are may be blocked for payment or which require corrections that normally appear in the exception list, we also need the vendor open items satisfying the criteria of (having Bank type as ABC and Payment method as Y) to be appearing in the exception list.
We don't want to exclude these items altogether by putting them in the 'Free selection' tab of F110 but rather want them to be in the exception list.
Any inputs are appreciated.

Hi
All payments due will be selected by the payment run depending on the selection criteria you enter. I.e. if you need invoices due with payment method Y, enter Y in the payment method selection.
I am not clear to what you mean by Bank type. However, do note that in the "Free Selection" tab allows you to include specific fields as well. I.e. by not selecting "Exclude values".

Payment not picking up in payment proposal, neither in exception list

Hi All,
Please can you advise on the attached. This was a payment that was rejected previously.
This payment is now neither being picked up in the payment proposal, nor is it in the Exception List. It is due to be paid, unblocked, and also all the house bank, partner bank details have been filled in all several hours before the payment proposal for the day.
Please can you investigate and advise?
This vendor has 1 documents, one document didn't get picked up.
Also payment proposal parameter is stated as up to posting date 11.02.2010 and this document over due date .exception list didn't show this as well.. Thi sbelow the entry passed
DOC type use-SB
40 gl account CA Recv Sundry - pay 3829.92
31 Vendor                                           3829.92
It might this reason bank detaiks change after the post document thts why not picked up this doc.
How to find out why it is not picked up..?

Hi
We have same problem in test system.here is also not picked up.how can we have sloved this problem.
This below also happening in this matter
The above is related to the payment made by MIG-T100 to MIG-T200(vendor). It has been returned to us due to incorrect bank account. Kindly request you to confirm which bank account number should be used. user informed me that it seems that the bank details default is still incorrect.
The fund is related to payment by Saga Frontier.
we have geetingthis error when i m trying to run in the test system.
Date       Time     Message text                                                                  Message class Message no. Message type
18.02.2010 20:49:32 Job started                                                                        00           516          S
18.02.2010 20:49:32 Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000158577, user ID PATEHD59)      00           550          S
18.02.2010 20:49:32 Log for payment run for payment on 11.02.2010, identification T100B                FZ           401          S
18.02.2010 20:49:32 End of log                                                                         FZ           398          S
18.02.2010 20:49:33 Job finished                                                                       00           517          S
Thanks

Custom security provider exception

Good day, colleagues. I want to raise an old topic.
I use custom security provider exceptions:
-AccountExpiredException
-AccountLockedException
However, the login() method only captures FailedLoginException
try
CallbackHandler pwcall = new weblogic.security.URLCallbackHandler(user, pass.getBytes("UTF-8"));
subject = weblogic.security.services.Authentication.login(pwcall);
weblogic.servlet.security.ServletAuthentication.runAs(subject, request);
catch (javax.security.auth.login.LoginException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException: [Security:090304]Authentication Failed: User ...
at weblogic.security.providers.authentication.LDAPAtnLoginModuleImpl.login(LDAPAtnLoginModuleImpl.java:240)
at com.bea.common.security.internal.service.LoginModuleWrapper$1.run(LoginModuleWrapper.java:110)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
I found similar questions IdentityAssertion custom exception, FailedLoginException asked many years ago for WLS 9.2
Their solution (wlp.propogate.login.exception.cause=true) does not work for WLS 10.3.
How to propagate original LoginException?
Or exception message only.

I did it! look closely to source code:
javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext:875
if (moduleStack[i].entry.getControlFlag() == AppConfigurationEntry.LoginModuleControlFlag.REQUISITE) {
// if REQUISITE, then immediately throw an exception
if (methodName.equals(ABORT_METHOD) || methodName.equals(LOGOUT_METHOD)) {
       if (firstRequiredError == null)
            firstRequiredError = le;
} else {
       throwException(firstRequiredError, le);
} else if (moduleStack[i].entry.getControlFlag() == AppConfigurationEntry.LoginModuleControlFlag.REQUIRED) {
// mark down that a REQUIRED module failed
if (firstRequiredError == null)
       firstRequiredError = le;
} else {
// mark down that an OPTIONAL module failed
if (firstError == null)
       firstError = le;
javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext:922
// we went thru all the LoginModules.
if (firstRequiredError != null) {
// a REQUIRED module failed -- return the error
throwException(firstRequiredError, null);
} else if (success == false && firstError != null) {
// no module succeeded -- return the first error
throwException(firstError, null);
} else...
I set Control flag: OPTION to DefaultAuth (was REQUIRED)
and order it after my LoginModule. (restart required!)
Now I catch my exceptions %)

Adding custom message in exception list of F110 transaction without adding payment block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for