Adding or removing signatures

I have created a signature for my business for my email communications. Not all my emails are business related but the signature appears automatically. I know that I can go to the drop down on the upper right showing SIGNATURE and choose NONE but I would rather be able to have it that other way around...just choose SIGNATURE when I WANT one. Is there a way???
SOLVED I found a WAY!

I'll try
Open Mail
Choose Prefrences
Create Signature
It will have two choices: a. All Signatures b. Telus (or whatever server you have)
Bottom of this screen has a place to Choose Signature.
I Chose NONE
If I want to put the signature INTO my email it can be done within the email itself. Right hand corner just above body of your email is a drop down menu next to Signature: Choose which ever signature one you want
Hope this was helpful

Similar Messages

Collect signatures workflow - Signatures can't be added or removed because this document was opened read-only

Hi, I have configured a "Collect Signatures" workflow for test Word document(.docx), then uploaded it to sample SP 2010 doc library (content type "Document"). This Word document has 2 empty Signature Lines in it.
After that i'm starting the Collect Signatures workflow on it , which is assigned to me and other user from my Active Directory.
Workflow is started and after that i'm receiving mail about assigned task which also contains link to document.
When i click on link it opens IE which contains SP library file path, after a while doc is opened in Word client in Read-only mode. When i want to sign the document info window pops up : "Signatures can't be added or removed because this document was opened
read-only" and i'm not able to compete task/sign doc from Word.
It is possible to sign the document when i go to SP library and opens this file directly from there (file drop-down menu-> open in MS Word).
I saw that this behaviour is similar to this article:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/31ba43ec-b04e-428d-9a66-0cc571934197/collect-signatures-workflow-using-firefox-not-showing-workflow-task-this-document-requires-your?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
but i'm using IE so it shouldn't be Active X issue.
I have also checked this MS Fix:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2661910
but changing CA settings to Permissive didn't help
Any ideas ?

Hi bezcisnien,
I could not reproduce this issue.
When you open this file directly by clicking the document Name link from SharePoint library, is there a
yellow message bar in Word document?
Did this happen to all users on all PCs?
Have you checked if it is a client side issue, test with different IE 8/9/10 versions for this issue (and IE compatibility mode, add-ons, trusted site zone etc)?
Thanks,
Daniel Yang
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

The 10.4 upgrade smart playlist editing has removed the ellipse as the 3rd button option along side the adding or removing a parameter. Why? And can we get it back?

I just did the iTunes update to 10.4 (80) from 10.3 on a MacPro OS X 10.6.8 . I am extremely nervous and saddened by a subtle change to the smart playlist editing features. I have 178.26gb of music, and a very extensive array of playlists and smart playlists taking full advantage of all the wonderful features and complexity someone has taken the time to develop. I have taken years of time developing my library, and this one little change will set me back substantially. The change? Removing the ellipse as the 3rd button option along side the adding or removing a parameter. The button allowed one to create levels or groups of parameters within the dialogue window that could act independently within one smart playlist. For example, songs from artist "A" needs at least 2 stars to be included, while songs from artist "B" need three stars, and they both can be in the same smart playlist which has its first level of complexity. I have lists that go dozens of layers beyond. And dozens more that cross reference. Is there any way we can get the hierarchy back, ie. Reintroduce the ellipse button? Or is there something new I do not know about? Thanks!

I would like to second this.
This subtle yet life-changing removal is a total loss for advanced users that (used to) take full advantage of "logical and hierarchical" playlists. It tremendously impairs the "smartness" of the feature, effectively removing the possibility of mixing "and" & "if" parameters—which was the real beauty of the whole concept of "smart playlists" à la iTunes.
Here's a simple example. I would like to create a playlist combining two genres (rock and electronic) with only songs that have a rating higher than 3. I cannot do that anymore. I need to create two playlists:
a first playlist (A) that displays [Rock] OR [Electronic] (note that this playlist will never be played, it's an intermediary step required for B)
then a second playlist (B) that displays [songs from playlist "A"] AND [with a rating higher than 3].
It's a pain. And it clutters up browsing lists on my iPad/iPhone a lot.
Smart playlists should get the ellipse button back!
Moreover, the possibility of creating / editing smart playlists on iOS via a nice menu would be just… awesome. I would have thought Apple was going in that "smart" direction with iTunes. In hoping it's just a delay… until iOS 5 maybe?

How to delete hyperlink (Remove signature) in a form created with InfoPath

Hello.
We have Sharepoint 2013 Foundation in production. It work with forms created with InfoPath. In these forms, digital signatures are used to approve. The problem is that once you have signed the forms, the user can remove the signature. That's what we want to
avoid.
Which file should I edit to remove the hyperlink? I can not find how to do it. Do you know a better option?
Greetings.
MCSA: Windows Server 2008

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you want to delete hyperlink (Remove signature) in a form created with InfoPath.
As far as I know, there is no OOTB way to achieve this. You need to use custom code to prevent removal of digital signatures.
Please add the OnBeforeChange handler code to the "signatureN" group where the signature is stored, not to the section you are signing.
In other words (my excample) browse to :
Tools - Form Options - Digital Signatures - "Enable digital signature for specific data" - Modify/Add
Note the "Store signatures in the following group" value. It will be a read only value, eg /my:myFields/my:signature3/my:signature4
Here is a similar thread for your reference:
http://www.infopathdev.com/forums/p/3661/12829.aspx#12829
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Best practice for adding and removing eventListeners?

Hi,
What is the best practice in regards to CPU usage and performance for dealing with eventListeners when adding and removing movieclips to the stage?
1. Add the eventListeners when the mc is instantiated and leave them be until exiting the app
or
2. Add and remove the eventListeners as the mc is added or removed from the stage (via an addedToStage and removedFromStage listener method)
I would appreciate any thoughts you could share with me. Thanks!
JP

Thanks neh and Applauz78.
As I understand it, the main concern with removing listeners is to conserve memory. However, I've tested memory use and this is not really an issue for my app, so I'm more concerned if there will be any effect on CPU (app response) if I'm constantly adding and removing a list of listeners every time a user loads an mc to the stage, as compared to just leaving them active and "ready to go" when needed.
Is there any way to measure CPU use for an AIR app on iOS?
(It may help to know my app is small - I'm talking well under 100 active listeners total for all movieclips combined.)

Cant edit or remove signature field

I accidentally added a digital signature field to a form I was making. Now I cant select it, or delete it from the form. Is there any way to get rid of it without starting over?
I looked in the hierarchy, and structure views and its not listed there. When I preview or use the form its there plain as day right smack dab in the middle of my form.
Im using live cycle 8.0
Thanks

From the sounds of it it is in the master page section of the hierarchy, instead of the subforms. That's the only way I've come accross being able to see something and not select it when editing.
Have a check there first, because I can't think of anything else right now! :)
Tom

Adding and removing plug-in - Gets dirty Catalog?

Trying many plug-in, adding and removing it, could be a problem with the file Catalog?
The removed plug-in leaves traces on catalog? E.g.: a bites growed catalog....
Thanks

Rob,
What about your ExifMeta plug-in?
How it works with the catalog?
Is there a catalog working difference between ExifMeta and DevMeta plug-in?
Thanks

Will Adobe be adding spot removal, adjustment brush and grad filter tools to lightroom mobile?

will adobe be adding spot removal, adjustment brush and grad filter tools to lightroom mobile?will adobe be adding spot removal, adjustment brush and grad filter tools to lightroom mobile?

We don't know (and anybody who knows can't say). It's an unanswerable question...

Dynamically adding and removing managed servers

Hi,
          I'm experimenting with adding and removing managed servers while applications are running on the cluster. I've written some scripts using weblogic.Admin to do the tasks. It seems that it's working. However, I'd like to confirm that this is supported. I also have the following questions:
          1. Applications running on a cluster are automatically deployed to the newly configured managed server once it is started using startManagedWebLogic.sh. Are there any non-error situations that applications are not started automatically?
          2. To remove a managed server from the cluster, I first shutdown the server gracefully and then delete the server from the domain using weblogic.Admin. Is this the recommended way to do it?
          3. Anything else I need to pay attention to before adding and removing servers?
          Thanks for any information and pointers.
          Ming

1. only if the staging mode is external.
          2. yes, if the server should be permanently removed. If the server is down for short maintenance, you do not need to remove it from the cluster.
          3. yes, try to avoid doing this during deployment tasks. That can be nasty.
          - Anders M.

Adding and removing tabs dynamically as in explorer

adding and removing tabs dynamically as in explorer or firefox

Think about how many translations are required to move your avatar, then think how many translations are required to move everything else in the entire world. Depending on whether there is more to translate in your avatar or in the rest of the world, you have your solution.
Not knowing how your system works I can't really suggest anything further but could the collision avoidance be interacting with everything in the world as well? That would increase the workload somewhat.

A alert for compute is being investigated. Configuration changes to Virtual Machines (IaaS), such as adding or removing a disk or an endpoint may cause reboots.

I receive the following alert from Windows Azure; Any clue what does this mean?
Time: 3/26/2014 7:37:33 PM
TITLE : compute : Advisory
SUBSCRIPTION ID: Not Available
DESCRIPTION: A alert for compute is being investigated. Configuration changes to Virtual Machines (IaaS), such as adding or removing a disk or an endpoint may cause reboots.

This issue correlates with an issue you might see at the Windows Azure Service Dashboard:http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/support/service-dashboard/
See below a paste from that page from the period of your alert. Friendly Azure is piping you courtesy notification vai your event log!
Compute : Advisory [East US, North Central US, South Central US, West US]
26 Mar 2014 1:29 AM UTC
A alert for compute is being investigated. Configuration changes to Virtual Machines (IaaS), such as adding or removing a disk or an endpoint may cause reboots.
John Joyner MVP-SC-CDM

[svn:osmf:] 14907: Adding comments, removing test URL.

Revision: 14907
Revision: 14907
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-03-22 05:50:23 -0700 (Mon, 22 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
Adding comments, removing test URL.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/OSMFPlayer/html-template/index.template.html
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/OSMFPlayer/src/OSMFPlayer.as

Thanks for the architecture comments. I'm interested in this topic because ALARM brought me to arch (although I've replaced the raspberry pi with an Intel-based machine now).
Well, I'm afraid of starting some kind of flame war by suggesting this officially as a lowly arch noob. I'll leave it up to the people who might profit by something like this (i.e. ALARM – or maybe they don't care and are fine with the current solution, in which case the change is not required at all). For the record, I like the glob solution. It's more flexible than just 'all' and it's easier to memorize the difference between 'any' and '*' compared to 'any' and 'all'.
It turned out the "adding users" topic is not an issue, because I realized I can simply set "User=nobody / Group=audio" in the systemd unit file to get rid of root privileges while keeping the permission to play audio without logging in. I also set up a minimal Arch VM to test if gnome-icon-theme can be dropped. I found no problems without that package, so I think I'm now ready to upload the modified PKGBUILD (and related files) to the AUR.
I'll flag this topic as solved. Feel free to add more comments though. Thanks everyone

Restricting an administrator to only adding or removing Business Roles

Hi:
Is there an out of the box rule or form in IDM that can restrict an administrator to only adding or removing business roles from accounts?
Thanks.

Hi Dwayne,
This BU ruling is somewhat of a newer function with OIA. For mass alteration, the old-school way would be to execute a SQL script directly towards the DB.
Simply change the last line on what correlation you wish (in this situation, it's looking at the BU Name and the GU office name)
delete from BU_GLOBALUSERS where businessunitkey > 0;
insert into BU_GLOBALUSERS(BusinessUnitKey,GlobalUserKey)
select BU.BusinessUnitKey, GU.GlobalUserKey from BUSINESSUNITS BU, GLOBALUSERS GU
where BU.BusinessUnitName = GU.officename;
Regards,
Daniel Redfern
Technicalconfessions.com

[svn:osmf:] 11359: Fixing MetadataWatcher not invoking a value change callback when the parent facet of the target value is added or removed .

Revision: 11359
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-11-02 05:20:01 -0800 (Mon, 02 Nov 2009)
Log Message:
Fixing MetadataWatcher not invoking a value change callback when the parent facet of the target value is added or removed.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/metadata/MetadataWatcher.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/org/osmf/metadata/TestMetadataUtils.as

mikeporter wrote:
I'm sorry I'm not aware of any "cumbersome" subpanels - unless of course you don't know what you're doing. There is this wonderful invention called a "subVI" that can be used to organize and simplify your code, or are they too "cumbersome" as well? You should really learn a bit about what you are pontificating over before you start running off at the mouth.
Mike...
I didn't want to step on your toes. No need to get personal.
Subpanels make some additional code necessary that hasn't got to do anything with the actual program. And I AM using subIVs as I wrote in my first post, which is exactly the root of the problem.
Nevertheless I now solved it in a way that comes close to what I wanted. I don't know if some of you meant your suggestions to be understood that way (at least I didn't ). The subVIs will now "insert" themselves (via invoke node) into a subpanel on the main vi, which they are given a reference of at call. This adds minimal aditional code, especially on the main VI which I want to keep as clean as possible. By clustering the panel reference into the parameters the subVIs are already given (not used in the example I attached below), there isn't even a change on the terminals of the subVIs.
I got to check now if this works well with event structures within the subVIs or if it can create the same problems like multiple event structures within a single VI.
So no global variables anymore and no writing values by property node. I don't know if this just wasn't possible in previous Labview versions I had a try at that (I guess it was 8.6 and/or 2009) or I just didn't come up with the idea back then.
And if the text wasn't that helpful, here are two screens:
Parent VI:
SubVI:
Attachments:
main.png ‏2 KB
subvi.png ‏5 KB

[svn] 4705: The SystemManager dispatches an event when a child bridge is added or removed .

Revision: 4705
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-01-28 06:18:28 -0800 (Wed, 28 Jan 2009)
Log Message:
The SystemManager dispatches an event when a child bridge is added or removed.
See FlexChangeEvent.ADD_CHILD_BRIDGE and FlexChangeEvent.REMOVE_CHILD_BRIDGE.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: SDK-18910
Reviewer: Alex
tests: checkintests
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-18910
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.3.0/frameworks/projects/airframework/src/mx/managers/WindowedSystemMa nager.as
flex/sdk/branches/3.3.0/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/managers/SystemManager.as
flex/sdk/branches/3.3.0/tools/dependencychecker/flex/tools/dependencychecker/FrameworkSwc DependencyRules.java
Added Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.3.0/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/events/FlexChangeEvent.as

Normally you should not see multiple versions... the plan was to just keep updating the one version you start with... but that plan didn't work out apparently and CC 2014 was released as an entirely separate version. You can get rid of the older versions and keep your fingers crossed that the plan is followed this time around.

Adding or removing signatures

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for