Af:query -valddate fields issue on adf:11.6

ADF11.6
I have af:query with text fields and some of fields data types as Integer and BidDecimals .
When user enter the characters instead of numbers in af:query fields and click on search ,
then should be error message saying enter only characters .
Please provide best approach and sample references
Thanks in advance .

Check 85. af:query component field validation which shows how to do this
Timo

Similar Messages

How do you change fields labels in adf query please ?

Hello , I would like to change the field labels in an adf query as they have been generated by default by oracle .
The only code found is as follows :
<af:query id="qryId1" rows="6" headerText="Search" disclosed="true" maxColumns="2"
                            value="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.queryDescriptor}"
                            model="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.queryModel}"
                            queryListener="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.processQuery}"
                            queryOperationListener="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.processQueryOperation}">
                    <af:inputText value="#{bindings.PrtDesc.inputValue}" label="Desc"
                                  required="#{bindings.PrtDesc.hints.mandatory}"
                                  columns="#{bindings.PrtDesc.hints.displayWidth}"
                                  maximumLength="#{bindings.PrtDesc.hints.precision}"
                                  shortDesc="#{bindings.PrtDesc.hints.tooltip}" id="it3">
                      <f:validator binding="#{bindings.PrtDesc.validator}"/>
                    </af:inputText>
                  </af:query>

Hi,
if you use ADF BC, set the UI Hints on the View Object attributes for the attributes and these will make the labels
Frank

Very urgent Decimal issue in ADF page

Hello friends,
i have an issue in ADF page which was weight field, issue has below.
1) weight filed was validated that without entering 5 digit value in filed, example suppose i enter 12345 in weight it is showing that in small dialog box -weight value should be 0 to 9999.999 only. but it is let me to go next field and submit button. it is happening only in create page only.
2)but when i go to detail page , same weight fild is populated there - i enter invalid weight something 12345, it is showing that in small dialog box -weight value should be 0 to 9999.999 only. but here let me not go to another filed until i ENTER valid value.
create page weight filed need to work same as detail page.i am new to ADF development, how to check where this validation done and how to fix this.
very very urgent.
Thanks,
vamshi.

If you use ADF BC, open the entity and choose "Business Rules". You can then add validation rules such as range limits under the attributes. It is usually best practice to include validation rules in the entity (model layer), this way they apply automatically to all view objects based on the entity and you are guaranteed to have only valid values in the database. (View layer validation may have its place as a convenience supplement.)
Read more about business rules in the developer's guide: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/web.1111/b31974/bcvalidation.htm

Ad hoc query text field reference

Hi all,
Faily new to all this and wonder if you have any insight on the following:
In ad hoc query I'm adding additional fields to a functional area. They subsequently show up in SQ02 in the left hand pane tree structure for that functional area.
Now, if I double click on one of the additional fields the most central pane shows the details of this field. One of the boxes in there called 'References' contains a field 'Text field' that associates a long text with the code that the field contains.
As a made-up example: the add. field could be Personnel Area, value "XY01", and it is associated with a field Personnel Area Long Text that contains "Xeta Yoyo Regional Office". This is the association shown in 'References' -> 'Text Field'.
My problem is that this 'Text field' field seems to be populated automatically, that is there is some kind of automatic link between the field and the foreign field that contains its associated long text. Also it's greyed out so un-editable.
Does anyone know where this relationship comes from? Does anyone know how to be able to edit this 'Text field' field?
Grateful for help,
Richie

Ok, I'll try to be a bit clearer.
For infosets in Ad Hoc Query, a field has an option to be related to another, different field that provides the long text version of this. Example: field P1000-OTYPE 'object type' is related to T7770-OTEXT 'object type text'.
This relationship is displayed for each infoset additional field: right click on the add. field -> display/change definition, text identification -> 'Determine LIKE reference using text field' in the pop up window.
Problem is this text field is <b>always</b> greyed out and uneditable. So the question was, how do you set this yourself?
Hope this clarifies stuff, thanks for any help,
Richie

Problem displaying a related field with an ADF Table

I am trying to use an ADF table to display data that is setup with TopLink as a one-to-one mapping. The database table is the TICKET table and it has a field STATUS_ID. I would like to display the STATUS from the STATUS table instead of the STATUS_ID. The STATUS table has a STATUS_ID key and the ticket table is setup with a FK constraint on the STATUS table.
I have two objects, Ticket and Status, that were created from the TopLink reverse engineer. I have created the TopLink mapping and generated the data controls ( this is the same process I used when going through the SRdemo). From the data control palette I dragged the FindAllTickets to my listTicket,jspx page and it shows a menu of options. I selected the ADF Read only table option and the only fields available in the dialog are from the TICKET table??
The ADF table works and display all the data in the TICKET table but I have not been able to add another column to show the status from the STATUS table. There is a node under the findAllTickets data controlI for the Status. I dragged the individual fields over as ADF output test I can see the data from all the fields including the STATUS.STATUS field but I only see the last row. Also,this is not in a table format.
Does anyone know how to set this up with an ADF table or is there a better way?
Thank you
Todd

Hello,
I'm encountering the same problem. One solution seems to use business components (a view object based on many entitiy objects) as described in the ADFBC tutorial, but like you i've based my development on the ADF tutorial and i think there is a solution but i didn't find it for the moment. I'm keep looking for a solution and if i find something, i'll send it to you.
Good luck
tif

Workaround for compressor HDV to DVD field issue?

I need a work around for the field issue apparent when down-converting HDV to DVD.
The Bonsai method <http://www3.telus.net/bonsai/Welcome.html> will not work, as there is too much motion and a side effect of the "fastest" conversion is that it gives a 3-d ghosting effect on fast motion in the frame.
I can not convert to 720P60 or 480P, as FCP converts it to 30P and then doubles the frames, and the motion is jittery.
I could dump it to camera and then down-convert in camera, but I have heard this is not a great method either.
I have seen in another forum to save the HDV timeline in FCP as a HDV quicktime movie, and then import that into DVD studio pro and have it down-convert, but DVD studio pro says this is an "incompatible file".
How do I get 1080i HDV footage onto a DVD so that it looks acceptable?

I had a similar problem with HDV (1080i shot on Cannon HV-20) footage, looks great in post and terrible when converted (herringbone lines and too many artifacts.) I’ve successfully used the Bonsai method on another piece I did but the footage was shot on a HVX-200 at 720 24p and there were no “action” shots. I wasn’t as successful using the method using 1080i footage and it definitely didn’t help with the fast motion shots. I did a search in this forum on HD to SD and there are a lot of helpful hints and methods. I experimented with a lot of the suggestions but in the end I was able to produce very nice and acceptable results by doing the following:
1] I didn’t create an SD sequence; I exported the footage as a Quicktime movie (self contained) straight from my HDV sequence.
2] I dropped the Quicktime file into Compressor and selected 90-minute DVD Anamorphic Best 2-pass VBR. Running Compressor from Final Cut ties up your system as well as there seems to be a delay between the handoff from Final Cut to Compressor (running the latest 5.x version and 2.3.) Creating a Quicktime file frees your system and it’s debatable if you actually compress faster or take a hit on quality. I’ve tested both from Final Cut and using a Quicktime file and didn't see any real difference in quality.
3] Change the field dominance from Top to Progressive in the tab where you see 2-Pass VBR Best and also in the encoding tab (not in front of my system so I can’t recall the name or order of the icons). In the encoding tab you will notice it says “same as source.” The pull down will show you Top, Bottom, Progressive, Automatic…I tried them all and in various combinations and anything other than progressive in both tabs produced undesirable results.
4] The options for Fast, Good, Better and Best in the other encoding pull down sections are a matter of preference and patience. Selecting Best in all categories takes a really long time to compress (36 hours for a 9-minute piece using a Mac Pro 3.0GHz dual-core Intel with 4GB ram.) I ran tests using different combinations and found that selecting the default settings is decent and stepping each category up to the next level helped but not enough to warrant the long compression cycle to stick with Better across the board. When you do your testing, it’s best to use as little footage as possible or you will find yourself waiting too long to see the actual results. I used a 1-second (29 frames) shot of a girl twirling around, hair flying everywhere, and girls next to her using hula-hoop’s.
5] Use the sliding bar in the viewer to see the impact of your choices before submitting the job. To the right you will see the “original” footage and to the left you can see the results of your selection. You can move the bar across the footage to see (approximately) the end results.
6] One thing I did notice is that no matter what settings I use, the output is slightly darker (reds were deeper, skin tones were warmer and not as smooth), but hey, you are going from HDV to SD so it’s not going to be perfect.
Hope that helps and good luck.
Kenny

HDV to DVD field issue

I need a work around for the field issue apparent when down-converting HDV to DVD.
The Bonsai method will not work, as there is too much motion and a side effect of the "fastest" conversion is that it gives a 3-d ghosting effect on fast motion in the frame.
I can not convert to 720P60 or 480P, as FCP converts it to 30P and then doubles the frames, and the motion is jittery.
I could dump it to camera and then down-convert in camera, but I have heard this is not a great method either.
I have seen in another forum to save the HDV timeline in FCP as a HDV quicktime movie, and then import that into DVD studio pro and have it down-convert, but DVD studio pro says this is an "incompatible file".
How do I get 1080i HDV footage onto a DVD so that it looks acceptable?

Just to make sure I undestand you (I am having the same problem...my video looks jagged and not very sharp).
You're saying to creat a new sequence that is the 720 x 480 10 Bit Uncompressed?
And then in Settings under field dominance set that to NONE and motion filtering quality to Best. When I put my sequence into this uncompressed timeline, do I need to render it or can I just go straight to compressor? Does it matter?
Are there any settings within Compressor to change, such as Deinterlacing, field dominance (progressive, lower/even, upper/odd), blur, anti-aliasing?
I am using HDV 1080i60 Codec to shoot in and edit.
Thanks so much. I will try your suggestion. Have you used this procedure much?

How to Query search panel internationalization in ADF.

Hi,
I am using JDeveloper Studio 11.1.1.2.0 and weblogic server 10.3.2.My Requirement is Internationalization.I did Internationalization(Arabic) In GUI level Its coming
but Problem is in Query search panel(VO level) i want to change Internationalization ,but it is not comming.I have configured faces-config.xml.but not comming in Query search panel.
In VO level ,i have change in Control Hints, As a label Tex---> #{UIServiceMessage['_U0627_U0644_U0646_U0638_U0627']} but still same text msg is comming.
So plz help me how to Query search panel internationalization in ADF.
Thanks&Regards
Anup

hi
check this
http://andrejusb.blogspot.in/2008/02/list-of-values-component-in-search-and.html
Regards

PSD comp field issue with only some elements

I have a comp created from a layered psd file, I have animated it and most elements are fine, except this one, have a look at the frame I exported. A field issue but why only with one of the elements? When it is un-rendered it draws fine, rendered though and I get this, this layer continues on for longer than the two minute limit as well, so I had to duplicate/copy the layer, the copied version is fine...
Also it is intermittent.
http://www.digital-image.com.au/videos/fcp/

hi preethi ,
just check this code .
data : quant like ekpo-menge,       " ur data type
          v_quant(13) type c.                     " --->proposed
          quant = 0.                                 " made initial.
          v_quant = quant.
write:/ quant.
if quant is initial.
write:/ 'hi'.                            "gets triggered cause some value is there
endif.
if v_quant is initial.
write:/ 'hi'.                           "even though value is there dosent get triggered
endif.
                       "cause its character.
if u can make the screen field as character then u can have solution in my opinion .
just check if this alternate can help ur code ..
regards,
vijay.

Format issue for Number field in af:query. Is it an ADF Bug?

Hi OTN,
Requirement : Format DepartmentId in query panel
I have created a view criteria from Employees table (HR Schema). I have four view criteria items called EmployeeId, DepartmentId, Firstname, LastName and all the items having validation property as Selectively Required. DepartmentId attribute have UI Hints property as Format Type = Number and Format = *0000* and Auto Submit=true.
But in UI, I am not able to do search from af:Query panel. It works fine without setting UI Hints property Format Type* and Format
Step 1 : Enter 123 in DepartmentId field
Step 2 : Click Search Button
Error : Please provide a value for atleast one of the indicated fields
Error Screen : http://www.freeimagehosting.net/24d51
Please check the below link for downloading the sample application
http://formatissue.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/FormatTest/FormatTest.zip
http://formatissue.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/FormatTest ( SVN version)
Note:
JDev Version : 11.1.1.5.0
I am using ADF BC and ADF Faces Components
Any recommendations fully appreciated
Thanks,
Dinil Mithra
Edited by: Dinil Mithra on Nov 23, 2011 4:51 PM
Edited by: Dinil Mithra on Nov 23, 2011 5:21 PM

Please find the metadata for VO attribute and View Criteria
<ViewAttribute
Name="DepartmentId"
PrecisionRule="true"
EntityAttrName="DepartmentId"
EntityUsage="Employees"
AliasName="DEPARTMENT_ID">
<Properties>
<SchemaBasedProperties>
<CONTROLTYPE
Value="edit"/>
<FMT_FORMATTER
ResId="model.EmployeesView.DepartmentId_FMT_FORMATTER"/>
<FMT_FORMAT
ResId="model.EmployeesView.DepartmentId_FMT_FORMAT"/>
<AUTOSUBMIT
Value="true"/>
</SchemaBasedProperties>
</Properties>
</ViewAttribute>
<ViewCriteria
Name="EmployeesViewCriteria"
ViewObjectName="model.EmployeesView"
Conjunction="AND">
<Properties>
<CustomProperties>
<Property
Name="displayOperators"
Value="InAdvancedMode"/>
<Property
Name="autoExecute"
Value="false"/>
<Property
Name="allowConjunctionOverride"
Value="true"/>
<Property
Name="showInList"
Value="true"/>
<Property
Name="mode"
Value="Basic"/>
</CustomProperties>
</Properties>
<ViewCriteriaRow
Name="vcrow103"
UpperColumns="1">
<ViewCriteriaItem
Name="EmployeesViewCriteria_vcrow103_EmployeeId"
ViewAttribute="EmployeeId"
Operator="="
Conjunction="AND"
Required="SelectivelyRequired"
GenerateIsNullClauseForBindVars="false"/>
<ViewCriteriaItem
Name="EmployeesViewCriteria_vcrow103_DepartmentId_EmployeesViewCriteria_vcrow103_DepartmentId_itemHolder_vcrow105_DepartmentId"
ViewAttribute="DepartmentId"
Operator="="
Conjunction="AND"
Required="SelectivelyRequired"
GenerateIsNullClauseForBindVars="false"/>
<ViewCriteriaItem
Name="FirstName"
ViewAttribute="FirstName"
Operator="CONTAINS"
Conjunction="AND"
Required="SelectivelyRequired"
GenerateIsNullClauseForBindVars="false"/>
<ViewCriteriaItem
Name="LastName"
ViewAttribute="LastName"
Operator="CONTAINS"
Conjunction="AND"
Required="SelectivelyRequired"
GenerateIsNullClauseForBindVars="false"/>
</ViewCriteriaRow>
</ViewCriteria>

ADF : af:query saved search issue

hi
Please consider this example application from Andrejus Baranovskis
http://jdevsamples.googlecode.com/files/UserCustomizationsSession.zip
(which he refers to from his blog post "User Customizations for Duration of Session in Oracle ADF 11g")
I see some strange behaviour with a saved search in this scenario:
(a1) open the UserCustomizationsSession.jws file in JDeveloper 11.1.1.1.0 and configure the "Hr" database connection in the Application Resources panel
(a2) right-click the main.jspx page in the ViewController project and click Run
(a3) on the "Index" page click the "Employees" button
(a4) on the "Employees Form" page, without entering any search values, click the "Search" button, which causes (all) the rows to show in the table
(a5) in the "Firstname" search field, enter "a" and click the "Search" button, which causes rows with "a" in their first name to show in the table
(a6) click the "Save..." button
(a7) in the "Create Saved Search" dialog, enter "my-a-search" in the "Name" field and keep the default values for the checkboxes ("Set as Default" checked, "Run Automatically" checked and "Save Results Layout" unchecked) and click "OK", which causes "my-a-search" to show up in the "Saved Search" dropbox
(a8) click the "Close" button
(a9) on the "Index" page click the "Employees" button, which causes the "Employees Form" page to show up with the results of "my-a-search"
(a10) in the "Saved Search" dropbox, select "EmployeesViewCriteria" and click the "Search" button, which seems to cause the table to refresh but still showing what seems to be the result of "my-a-search"
(a11) try to change the value of the "FirstName" search field or use the "Reset" button, each time the result of "my-a-search" shows up
question
(q1) Why don't I get all the rows in step (a10) instead of just "my-a-search"?
many thanks
Jan Vervecken

Hi Jan,
seems related to bug 8817108 - AF:QUERY DOES NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITH MUTIPLE VIEW CRITERIA
I'm copying below an except of the SR with possible workarounds:
The key point in the modified testcase is that we created a method in the
Application Module that resets the View Criteria of the View Object:
    public void unapplyViewCriteria() {
        String[] allVC = getViewObj1().getAllViewCriteriaNames();
        for (String vc: allVC ) {
            System.out.println("Unapply View Criteria: " + vc);
            getViewObj1().removeApplyViewCriteriaName(vc);
    }This method was published as a client interface and added to the bindings of
the Page definition (by a drag&drop from the DataControl palette):
    <methodAction id="unapplyViewCriteria" RequiresUpdateModel="true"
                  Action="invokeMethod" MethodName="unapplyViewCriteria"
                  IsViewObjectMethod="false" DataControl="AppModuleDataControl"
                  InstanceName="AppModuleDataControl.dataProvider"/>This created a button that we updated as the following:
        <af:commandButton
                          text="Go To Other Page AND Unapply View Criteria"
                          disabled="#{!bindings.unapplyViewCriteria.enabled}"
                          id="cb1"
                          actionListener="#{bindings.unapplyViewCriteria.execute}"
                          action="otherpage"/>This button will execute unapplyViewCriteria() and then navigate to the other page.
That's a first solution, where we unset the View Criteria just when navigating.
Another option is to unapply the ViewCriteria when the af:query has completed its query.
This can be done by the method we exposed in the aforementioned Note.
The method processQuery() in the backing bean is:
    public void processQuery(QueryEvent queryEvent) {
         * add your PreQuery code here
         * invoke the real processQuery
        invokeMethodExpression("#{bindings.NameStartsWithMQuery.processQuery}",
                               Object.class, QueryEvent.class, queryEvent);
         * add your PostQuery code here
        // Workaround for Bug 8817108
        BindingContainer bindings = getBindings();
        OperationBinding operationBinding = bindings.getOperationBinding("unapplyViewCriteria");
        Object result = operationBinding.execute();
    }where we first execute the standard processQuery, and then unapply the View Criteria.
If memory serves me well, customer opted for WA 2.
Regards,
Didier.

KFF(KeyFlex Field) Issue in Query Mode in GL Module

HI all
i have developed a custom form in GL, i am facing some problem the KFF attached.
In the query mode when i do ctlr+L on the KFF attached field, i am getting the following standard note
" APP-FND-01345:List of values is not available for this field while in Enter-Query Mode"
Any point on this issue.
Regards
Anand

I assume you are working with Oracle Apps.
We have a special section of different forums under the E-Business Suite category, you'll get more help there for Oracle Apps issues, this is the Forms Forum.
Tony

KFF(KeyFlex Field) Issue in Query Mode

HI all
i have developed a custom form, i am facing some problem the KFF attached.
In the query mode when i do ctlr+L on the KFF attached field, i am getting the following standard note
" APP-FND-01345:List of values is not available for this field while in Enter-Query Mode"
Any point on this issue.
Regards
Anand

I assume you are working with Oracle Apps.
We have a special section of different forums under the E-Business Suite category, you'll get more help there for Oracle Apps issues, this is the Forms Forum.
Tony

Adf:Query - Saved Search issue

Hi all,
Using Jdev 11g. R1(Version 11.1.1.7.0) , I am getting the following error on returning to my UI's Advanced Search page after I add a field from 'Add Field" button and save it as a default search.
*"Would you like to save the changes you made to the layout before proceeding?"*
Any suggestion for debugging this issue.
Thanks in advance..

I believe you are encountering a usability issue. When you receive, "Would you like to save the changes you made to the layout before proceeding?", it is question not an error. You added a field and must have changed something in the results table (added a column, reordered column), and it is asking if you want to save the changes to the results layout table with your saved search. I think that may be what is going on here. I am not sure if you can disable this question, but you may be able to change the message itself to be worded differently.

Query Panel field extends beyond right margin

I've a .jspx with a Query Panel. The problem is that the search field for a 500-character string attribute extends beyond the right margin; so if a user enters a long search criterion, the user can never see the entire criterion.
Is there a way to force such fields to be multi-line; in other words, to be the functional equivalent of an af:inputText with the Rows attribute set to greater than 1? I've tried setting various combos of af:query attributes, but to no effect, so would appreciate some advice:
Here is the relevant part of the page source:
<f:view>
<af:document id="d1">
<af:messages id="m1"/>
<af:form id="f1">
<af:pageTemplate viewId="/mainTemplate.jspx" id="pt1">
<f:facet name="content">
<af:group id="mainGroup">
<af:panelGroupLayout layout="vertical" id="pgl1">
<af:panelHeader text="#{viewcontrollerBundle.ACCESSIBILITY}" id="ph1"
helpTopicId="APP_HELP_RECONSTRUCTION">
<af:query id="qryId1" headerText="Search" disclosed="true"
value="#{bindings.AccessibilityMasterDetailsJoinedVCAltContainsQuery.queryDescriptor}"
model="#{bindings.AccessibilityMasterDetailsJoinedVCAltContainsQuery.queryModel}"
queryListener="#{bindings.AccessibilityMasterDetailsJoinedVCAltContainsQuery.processQuery}"
queryOperationListener="#{bindings.AccessibilityMasterDetailsJoinedVCAltContainsQuery.processQueryOperation}"
resultComponentId="::resId1"
criterionFeatures="matchCaseDisplayed"/>
</af:panelHeader>
<af:table
</af:table>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</af:group>
</f:facet>
</af:pageTemplate>
</af:form>
</af:document>
</f:view>
Versions: JDeveloper 11.1.1.4, ADF Business Components 11.1.1.59.23. Same issue occurs in both Firefox 3.n and IE 8.n.
Thanks!

Thanks Suresh. That solves the most important part of the question, it makes for a huge improvement.
What i am also wondering is whether on a query panel the search field can be made to display as 'multi-line'. for example, a Display Width of 175 keeps the entire search field visible sans extending beyond the right margin. However, if the user has a search string of more than 175 chars - which could happen in our use case - the user still has to 'scroll' to see the remaining characters (this is a 500-char attribute). So I am wondering if ADF provides the ability to make the search text box display as multi-line.
After following your suggestion i also tried settting the Display Height control hint to 4. But the field rendered in the browser as a 1-row field.

Af:query -valddate fields issue on adf:11.6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for