Aftre MIGO - PO should not be unreleased
Dear Friends,
After MIGO , if i go to ME29N then systems allow me to unrelease PO. WHY?
How can stop this .( Means After MIGO , PO should not be unreleasd)
Regards,
Mahesh.
Hi,
Set Changeability Indicator 1 in Release Indicator during designing of release procedure which act as once PO released, PO can not be changed & do GR.
Regards,
Biju K
Similar Messages
-
After MIGO po should not change
Dear Sir,
my requirement is If material document exist against purchase order then system will not allowed to user to change purchase order or cancel release by t code me29n or me22n.
Regards,
Mukesh DwivediHi,
To make the PR mandatory in PO you can handle it through Function Authorization
Go To OMET create a function authorization PR Mandatory tick the "ref. to PR" & "ref to quotation" all the fields in General Parameners, Field Selection : NBF
Go to SU01 and assign parameter EFB to the user ID so for that user PR will be mandatory for creating PO.
Regards,
Manish Jain -
Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
Hi
how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
@sakhiThese are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option. -
QM system has expired, MIGO should not be allowed
HI All,
If the vendor QM Sytem has expired ,then the sytem should not allow posting of goods receipt (MIGO) by using the functionality of Quality Info record or any other methods of control like vendor master or purchasing info record.
Please provide your valuable suggestions
Thanks & regards,
rajeshThe QM system is only designed to control the creation of the PO against vendors with the specifiied QM system.
If you want to block receipt at the time of MIGO, you will need to use a MIGO user exit to do a check against the vendor's QM system to verifiy it ihas not expired since the purchase order was created.
FF -
MIGO should not create after PO Delivery Date
Hi,
We have a PO with multiple line items and diff. Delivery Dates...
We want that during MIGO Process, Posting Date should not exceed to PO Delivery Date.
Means, if PO Delivery Date is 05.07.2014, then MIGO should not created after this date...
Please suggest.If you want to achieve the scenario with standard settings, then you can use the field "Latest GR date".
Just put the same date as delivery date in this field. Then system will not allow to do GR if the Posting date is exceed with compare this date in MIGO.
You can find the latest GR date in Delivery tab in PO. Also you can maintain the field as mandatory in PO to avoid the field value blank as per your requirement.
Also if you want to change Latest GR date along with delivery date, just take the steps which is explained in this document Mass changes from one field to another field.
**Edited by: Dëv Päträ -
Excise Invoice Tab should not open at GRN
Hello all,
I am trying to procure assets with account assignment A and without material code. I am using 0% tax. We also do not have any records in J1ID tcode.
However, during GRN the Excise invoice tab is opening up.
One way to get around at GRN is to use " no excise entry". But this tab should not be opening at all.
Can you guess what configuration, if any, might be making the system propose excise for the PO. The PO item is not excisable in fact.
Thanks and regards,
SoumyadeepHi,
If you using asset PO without material master with a vendor. Now if you do not want excise TAB should come in MIGO, then remove vendor number in J1ID t.code and then do GR.
If you want to enter excises details , then you should slect check box of "Duty different at GR" check box selected ( so that you can entry manually the excises value in MIGO screen) in MIGO Setting segment in Maintaining Excise Group setting in following path
SPRO ->>Logistics general ->> tax on Goods Movements-->>India -->> Basic setting -->>Maintain Excise Groups
NOTE:
If you want Excise fields are should not be open, then you DO NOT should select check box of "Duty different at GR" in the above path. But think what about Dealer Invoice Scenarios.
Regards,
Biju K -
Base Amount should not be more than PO net price
hi
Base Amount should not be more than PO net price , in MIGO if the Material is excisable excise tab will be populate i can able to change the base amount . i need the restriction Base Amount should not be more than PO net price , this requirement for purticarly for the dealar relegated tax codes . i am not maintain any conditions relegated BED ,ECESSand SECESS in the taxcode . i will eater the excise tab in MIGO or J1IEX Directly . please advise me how to restrict
@sakhiif that is the case why are you proividing the Authorization for MIGO_GR transcation...........Restrict the MIGO transaction and try to give MB01 transaction .So that there will no discrepancy in PO to GR....
-
MIGO Qty should Update Order Qty
Gurus,
Reqirement is during third party process:
MIGO step should update the migo confirmed qty to
sales order confirmed quantity .
suppose : order raised for 100 qty .
PO raised for 11 qty
MIGo qty 80 qty
So, migo should update qty 80 to sales order qty - from 100 to 80.
RegardsHi Jitender,
As Per my understanding MIGO is third party is used for Statistical pourpose only, A you are not getting any physical good in your Premises. Good will delivered Directly from your vendor to your customer.
Hope this iwll help.
Thanks,
Raja -
Frieght cost should not loaded on inventory
Dear SAPERS,
We have one scenario that, fright charges should not loaded on Inventory account for that material (means fright cost should not added to material price when price control is MAP)
I have copied standard FRC1 conditions and added in my pricing procedure and static is marked, in condition accruals also marked.
Account key FRE and Accruals FR1 is given and G/L accounts maintained OBYC for TE keys also, but fright cost is loading to inventory.
Pricing procedure:
15 0 FRB1 Freight (Value) 1 FRE FR1
16 0 ZFB1 Freight (Value) ACME 1 FRE FR1
17 0 FRC1 Freight/Quantity 1 FRE FR1
18 0 ZFC1 Freight/Quty ACME 1 FRE FR1
Account entries at MIGO
ACME 1 89 131000 Inventory - Raw Mat 119.20 USD
ACME 2 96 211200 Goods Received /Invo 109.20- USD
ACME 3 50 217300 Freight Clearing Acc 10.00- USD G/L account assign to FR1 in OBYC
G/L account 217301 is assigned to FRE in OBYC, but no account entries coming here the fright and materials cost is loading to Inventory account 131000.
Please suggest how to post fright cost to FRE account.
Thanks in advance,
Venkat
Edited by: Venkat.mm.sap on Mar 15, 2011 2:13 PMhi sap gurus,
very late to reply..but, below is the solution for NON-INVENTORIED FREIGHT CONDTION in MM pricing condition :
OPTION 1 :
>> copy FRA1 std cond to new cond.
>> Put condition category - Blank & tick mark accrual.
>> Add new cond in pricing procedure. Do not put accrual in pricing proc.
OPTION 2 :
>> copy FRA1 std cond to new cond.
>> Put condition category – B & do not tick mark accrual
>> Add new cond in pricing procedure & tick mark statistical (Accruals-can/can not be put. No effect)
>> You can add Freight vendor in PO as condition category is B
pls try this & reply.
Regds,
nilesh -
Without release schedule agreement schedule lines should not be maintain
Hi experts,
i made a schedule agreement and i have given 2 level of releases for it.. so with out releasing i maintained schedule lines in me38, then i made migo then system says the document has not been released yet. but what my query is schedule lines should not be happened with out release means it should stop here only. So how to give check for it.i have searched in system messages but nothing is there in that. So please solve this problem its urgent.Hello,
I have the same problem as you. Someone know something about it?
kanyadhara, did yo solve this problem?
Thanks a lot -
Duplicate GR Posting Control With Respect to MIGO Filed Delivery Note
Hi Team,
Is there any possiblity to check / control GR Posting with respect to the same PO and same delivery note reference.
I have a PO 1000001 with line item 10 with qty 100. I did a MIGO with respect to this PO for 50 qty with delivery note ref DC-53.
When i try to do MIGO with the same PO and same delivery note DC-53 for the balance 50 quantiy,
System should intimate me as warning / error..
How can we acheive this by standard SAP. If not possible by standard SAP wats the alternate.
VijayHI Vijay,
It is possible to check warning / error message display of the MIGO bottom of the screen through ABAP delveloper with enhancement (Validation).
After enhancement, MIGO posting is not allow to duplicate DC Ref.no. and also double entry of the same DC ref.no.
Hope, it is useful for you.
Regards,
K.Rajendran. -
Confirmation qty in co11 should not be more than operation GR qty (subc)
hi,
i have an issue after the operation(external process). we made GR in migo. it will be updated in particular production order
co03 - operation overview - select operation - ext proc tab - GR quantity ( here it is updated after migo)
now we have to do confirmation in co11. yield+ scrap = GR quantity(external operation quantity)
it should not more that of GR quantity.
sometimes they do partial receipt and do remaining operation in inhse.
so system should check First operation GR quantity , while making confirmation in co11
is it possible????
thanks in advance...Prakhash,
You will have to implement the Production Order Confirmation user-exits to check based on your requirement. Try the below user-exits and see which one meet's your requirement.
CONFPP01 |PP order conf.: Determine customer specific default values |
CONFPP02
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPP03
PP order conf.: Cust. specific check after op. selection
CONFPP04
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPP05
PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONFPP06
PP Order Confirmations: Actual Data Transfer
CONFPP07
Single Screen Entry: Inclusion of User-Defined Subscreens
Try and revert back.
Regards,
Swapnil -
Field should not display in the subtotal row in ALV report after sorting .
we have a requirement, after sorting and subtotaling, the output in ALV is -
vbeln amount1 amount2 amount3
123 11 12 13
123 12 13 14
123 23 25 27
133 11 12 13
133 12 13 14
133 23 25 27
Now the customer wants the ALV outpput in this fashion -
123 11 12 13
123 12 13 14
23 25 27 --->123 (vbeln) should not come in subtotaling row
133 11 12 13
133 12 13 14
23 25 27--->133(vbeln) should not come in subtotaling rowHi,
if it helps you could create a hierachy. In this way you can define the field catalog for the lines and for the subtotal columns. The only thing is that you would always show the subtotal rows.
You have references of hierachy alvs in
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c060fcb4-2c62-2b10-d2b2-f32407a5cc6f
ALV Hierarchy
alv hierarchy
In this case it also sorts
Sorting for ALV hierarchy
I hope it helps.
Edited by: Oscar Pecharroman on Aug 2, 2010 1:13 PM -
Free Goods Should not down MAP -
Hi, MM / FI Gurus!
We have a scenario where Vendor offers a Discount in Kind. For e.g. For Order Qty over 1000 Pcs vendor offers 10 Pcs free over each 100 Pcs. Assuming PO price as 10 units then for 1200 Ordered Qty vendor delivers 1200 + 120 = 1320
In PO the Free Goods are determined correctly (in either cases whether Inclusive / Exclusive). Order quantity in first line has a gross price determined. The second line tiem in PO has Free Goods Quantity determined as per procedure for Discount in Kind, with zero price.
When we do GR the Inventory is up by Order Quantity + Free Goods Quantity.
Automatic posting in MM determines the GL correctly.
Dr Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 Amt 12000 Curr
Cr GR/IR Clearing: 200060 Amt 12000- Curr
As expected MAP goes down due to Free Goods (Zero Price)
Client wants to up the inventory for by Order Qty + Free-Goods Qty but this should not down the MAP as well.
I have activated Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts for Incoming Invoice
Idea was to Credit Gross Price on the Free goods Quantity to Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 to make up the MAP in material master and Debit the same amount to Other Income as follow:
Dr GR/IR Clearing: 200060 Amt 12000 Curr
Cr Vendor Account: 200001 Amt 12000- Curr
Dr Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 Amt 1200 Curr (Free Goods)
Cr COS-Drugs & Med: 500100 Amt 1200- Curr (Free Goods)
However we cannot post Gross-price for Free goods Directly on the same GL(which has Automatic posting Checked) to Up the MAP (which falls down because of free goods having zero price).
Is there any way in FI to have both Automatic and Manual posting for the same GL?
Also I am not sure that after we do this if MAP will be Up.
Is there any other way may be by using Movement Type for such Movements?
Thanks
Atul SonalkarHi Atul
Create PO only for the material for which you are going to pay your vendor.
ie., for 1000 units @ Rs. 12 = 12000. Post GR.
Now you are getting 100 units free. Don't enter this in your existing PO. Create a new PO for the free goods and post GR.
Your MAP related problem will be solved.
Regards
Rajesh
Do reward if this is useful. -
Free goods should not determine in sales order
Hi,
I have maintained the free goods determination in SAP CRM with validity period in T Code: /sapcnd/gcm and have created a quotation for the material which has a free goods validity.The free goods are determined at quotation level, when i was converting the quotation to the sales order the free goods validity period got expaired.In this case the free goods are should not get determined in the sales order.But when i test it in IDES system the free goods are getting determined in the sales order eventhough free goods validity period expaired.
Can any one tell me how to restict the free goods in the sales order level when the validity period expaired at the time of sales order create.
Regards
NagarajuHi ,
You can use the BADI CRM_COPY_BADI. Here you can implement the check for products which are free and have expired to be excluded from copying from quotation to sales order.
Regards
Kavindra
Maybe you are looking for
-
Help! my Mac Mini won't start up!
Hi, Bought my Mac Mini (server editino) a week ago. Been playing with it & so far so good. But tonight, I went 'Log off administrator', it thought about it for a while and the screen when blue and flashed every now and then. I forced shut down by hol
-
Finder doesn't work properly after waking up from sleep?
I have a brand new MacBook Pro with Lion installed on it. It travels back and forth from home to work with me, and at work I plug it in to an Apple Display. When I leave work, I put the laptop to sleep and take it home. At home, when it wakes up from
-
I am wondering if anyone else has noticed that fearnet has not updated for a while. A friend who has comcast has updated movies. I tried an online chat, but the guy had never heard of fearnet and said that he didn't know if is was discontinued and th
-
Crystal report version 11 - object insert
Post Author: Marvel CA Forum: Crystal Reports I have inserted a multipage word document, How can I view the entire word document? It seems I can only see the first page. It does not make sense to me that you can insert an object but only view the fir
-
Basic question reg. distributed installatio
Hi everybody, i have a very basic question, for which i wasn`t able to find a simple answer/solution. I am planning to set up Bea in a distributed environment. the idea is to have a physical machine for the pre