Aggregation level on single level basis or multiprovider

we use IP 7.0 and have a planning cube for CO-PA data, as well as a multiprovider combining the actual cube and the planning cube for COPA data. We need to implement a planning tool in which planning simple planning functions are needed on the single basis (copy, revaluation, multiply,manual planning ...) as well as on the multi-provider (top-down with reference data).
-> on which level(s) should we define the aggregation level? Do we need to define it on the multiprovider (in order to do the top-down) or can we split it up (single level and multi-provider) and define a workbook with a manual planning function on the single level AND including the top-down based on the multiprovider?

I agree with Gregor,
I think it is more logical to configure your Aggregation Level on top of your Multi-Provider, especially since you already have a need to view ref data from Actuals to perform calculations on your Planned.  You can always restrict your 'simple' functions to the appropriate InfoProvider.
As for the FOx question, you can always restrict to each InfoProvider when writing your FOx (either inside the FOx code or using the FOx conditions).

Similar Messages

  • Upload single level variable cost in SNP PPM in mass by MASSD

    Hi experts,
    I am trying to upload single level variable cost in SNP PPM in mass by MASSD by following selections:-
    Object Type:- PPM
    Selction Criteria:-
    Component:- Plan        Attrib:- Use of Plan
    Component:- Plan        Attrib:- Plan
    Components & Attributes to be Maintained
    Component:- Plan        Attrib:- Var.Sing.Lvl Costs
    While maintaining the cost, under selection criteria, compoment: PLAN and attribute: PLAN I am unable to maintain multiple plan names.
    The single level variable cost that I have to maintain for all these plans is the same and therefore was trying to use transaction MASSD
    Can you please throw some light on how multiple PLAN selections can be done?

    *There is a question regarding the resoucre  consumptions  relevant to PDS in SNP,*
    ****The inputs are:****
    ****1) Base Qty= 7700 TH****
    ****2) Set Up =45 MIN****
    ****Resource consumed by operation activity is 112 207 seconds = 31,17 hours.****
    ****Unfortunately we didnu2019t understand how this figure is calculated.****
    ****Can you please help us in this****

  • Getting aggregated values on disaggregated level...

    Hi all,
    For example I have the following selection in my query:
    Query 1.
    City     Store     Item     Sales @ UOM
    City1     Store 1     Item1     100
              Item2     150
         Store 2     Item1     200
              Item2     125
    Item sales quantity on the City level will be the following:
    Query 2.
    City     Item     Sales @ UOM
    City1     Item1     300
         Item2     275
    And I need to use this data in the first query, so I could access the aggregated city sales data in each disaggregated row, like this:
    Query 3.
    City     Store     Item     Sales @ UOM     Sales @ UOM (City lvl)
    City1     Store 1     Item1     100          300
              Item2     150          275
         Store 2     Item1     200          300
              Item2     125          275
    Does anyone have an idea how this could be achieved?
    I've already tried restricted and calculated key figures, and it seems that this isn't an option in this case...
    Best regards,

    Hi Andrey,
    I have tried the same at my end. And yes you are right. It is coming as you have showed here.
    But i have tried the same requirement around a year back and I had achieved it, unfortunately I am not able to completely recall the same.
    However there is one way which you can achieve a similar display.
    You could view the report to this level
    City     Item     Store     Sales @ UOM     Sales @ UOM (City lvl)
    City1     Item 1     Store1     100          300
              Store2     200          300
         Item 2     Store1     150          275
              Store2     125          275
    You can achieve the above display by doing the below
    for the second key figure (city level) - use formula (sumct (base KF) )
    With this we will get the above view, but one disadvantage is we have to let the result rows for "store" be displayed. If it is removed the second KF will change.
    But I am still trying at my end and will let you know as soon as I figure it out.

  • CRM Standalone: Single Level BOM for Structured Product

    Hi there,
       I am working on CRM 5.0 Standalone. I have made a structured product.
       Header Product: Prod1  (Item Cat Group: LUMF)
       Component Product: Prod2 (Item Cat group: NORM)
       I have copied item category TAP (for prod 1) and TAN. (For prod 2)
       I am not able to run single level BOm in Sales transaction Type.
       Could u Please let me know how to specify the ITEM CAT DETERMINATIOn Pro.
       I mean the values one shud have for: (in Item Cat Determination ptoc )
       Transaction Type:  (I have put my sales tran)
        Item Cat Group:    Structred Below
        Item cat usage   (EMPTY)
        Main Item Cat      (empty)
        Item cat              ZTAP (copied from TAP)
        Alt Item cat         ZTAN (copied for TAN without Pricing).
       Could u help me with the correct set of entries here so that i may be able to see the BOm in sales transaction.
    Note IS BOM possible without the pricing data at the sub item level.
    Imp: Pls answer ASAP.  ....urgent would award Points

    Hi Leon,
         I have done it, but it does not work.
         I am getting the error as "No Item Catagory could be created"
         WIsh to know if Pricing has to be necessary here for BOM.
          Or any changes u want to suggest in the Prod master.
         just to describe the product again its
        Prod 1 ( header product) Material, Item cat group : LUMF, Base unti of measure: EA.
        Prod 2 . ( Sub item) Material, Item cat group : NORM, Base unti of measure: EA.
        FINALLY linked thru relationship Prod 2 is ACCESSORY of PROD 1

  • WC27 - Single Item, Single Level(?)

    I would just like to ask if there is a way in transaction WC27 (for MRP Batch Run) to only run Single Item, Single Level Materials during processing?
    I ask because I have a requirement (in addition to filtering material codes) to only run single item, single level entries for WC27 similar to MD03 but the customer wants the batch run feature.
    Hope to hear from you soon.

          As it is correctly answered by the gurus above that it's difficult/not possible to run Batch structured MRP for only run Single Item, Single Level plannings..
    Hoiwever it can be mapped with the help of ABAPer to ask him/her to do some coding for standard report RMMRP000 .this is a standard ABAP report available within your SAP system (depending on your version and release level).  there is also some   standard documentation available for this report and a few details of other objects it interacts with such as tables, function modules, includes etc. If you would like to see the full code listing simply enter the object name( RMMRP000 ) into the relevant SAP transaction such as SE38 or SE80
    Within the comments section below there is also an opportunity for anyone to be able add useful hints and information specific to this SAP object. This means that you and other users will be able to find these details quickly by simply searching on the object name.
    Hope it could work for you.
    All the best!

  • ML single-level determination problems

    we have some problems about single-level determination:
    category                        quantity                  prelimval                   price diff             price
    Beginning Inventory      55,821,791.824      4,326,188.88            0.00                     77.50
    Receipts                        84,472,000             7,301,759.68            3,116,204.28      123.33
       Cumulative Inventory 140,293,791.824    12,126,995.37          3,116,204.28      108.65
    Consumption                 93,890,170             8,115,866.30            2,085,487.50       108.65
         Not Allocated           0                             0.00                          *592,153.96*
         Production               48,880,000              4,225,187.20            *493,568.10*
             6.1111004 LG01 387,000                   33,452.28                 8,596.04              108.65
             6.1111009 LG01 693,000                   59,902.92                 15,392.91            108.65
             6.4510111 LG01 39,939,000              3,452,327.16            *298,671.23          93.92*
             6.1111005 LG01 387,000                   33,452.28                 8,596.04              108.65
             7.5710050200 LG01 94,000               8,125.36                   2,087.93               108.65
    Ending Inventory          46,403,621.824       4,011,129.07            1,030,716.78        108.65
    material 6.4510111 was allocated 298,671.23, but 887,124.66 (2,085,487.50 * 39,939,000 / 93,890,170) is the correct amount, who can tell me y ? tks..

    Single level price determination is to calculate the unit price of material for a period. It takes into account the price differneces arising out of Price Differences like GR/IR Differences, Exchange Rate Differences, and revaluation differences to calculate the actual price of  a material.
    You can have more information of Single Level Price Determination at the following link:

  • Single level planning

    What setting to be done for single level planning of following BOM.
    When MRP is run for shud create planed order for M1 only.....and when MRP is run for M1.1 then it shud create planed order for M1 .1 only...similarly for M1.2.

    Lets see, you are using ETO, which by design is a multilevel planning process, using project/WBS as MRP segments, but you want to only plan the first level, and then the second level, at your discretion?
    Standard SAP does not support this requirement.  To me, it seems to defeat the whole concept of project planning.  However, I will assume that you have a valid business requirement.
    I suggest you speak to your developers to create a specialized selection userexit for MD01.  You could craft it to select only M1 material.  You could also craft it to select only M1.* materials on a subsequent run.  Specifications of the selection process would have to be created by you.
    Standard userexit for MD01 can be found in IMG>Production>MRP>Planning>User Exit Material Selection for planning run.

  • Material ledger single level run error

    Hi All,
    During last month ML run, we faced a problem. For some of the Material of certain Material Type even Single level run could not be done. On analysis we found that for these materials previous periods ML run was not done. We are not sure why in previous months system did not select these materials for ML. Because in the Change data for Material master there is nothing of that sort which discriminate those materials in the earlier periods but picked the same in the last period.
    Now we have closed last month ML with errors for those materials, but we cannot let this continue for future months.
    Can any one tell me how to exclude those materials in future runs, because those materials are not to be used for any movement in future and the stock balance has already been made to zero.
    And give the probable cause, or where can we find the reason why those materials got picked last month ML run but not in periods prior to that.

    Thanx Karl,
    Firstly this is to inform you that for most of those materials there has not been any movements for past few months and not even in the last month. So I am not able to understand what change has triggered system to select those materials in the last month but left out in prior periods.
    Secondly I am not able to understand the MLHELP_SET_PP_STATUS_70 thing. I have never used it and I am not sure whether we have it installed or not. Is it an add-on to standard SAP? Please tell me how can we run that report. Or if not installed, is there any other way by which we can change the status of the Material to 70.

  • Can I use User Exit u2013 IWOC0004 u2013 Change Single-Level List for TCODE IW37N?

    Hi All,
    Can I use User Exit u2013 IWOC0004 u2013 Change Single-Level List for TCODE IW37N?
    In documentation of the User Exit I can see that I  can use this user Exit for IW37(Program - RIAFVC20) , but I want to use this for IW37N (RIH_ORDER_OPERATION_LIST).
    Please tell me is it possible.
    With best regards,

    Hi Pete Sir,
           I am on 4.7 , how to work with it. I am going to use screen exit IW0110018 and I want to add User fields in the IW37N.
    Thanks with best regards,

  • Single level price determination in material ledger

    What is the meaning of single level?Doe it include only the price determination of procured raw materials or will it also include semi finished and finnished goods?

    Single level price determination is to calculate the unit price of material for a period. It takes into account the price differneces arising out of Price Differences like GR/IR Differences, Exchange Rate Differences, and revaluation differences to calculate the actual price of  a material.
    You can have more information of Single Level Price Determination at the following link:


    Please explain the difference between Single Level and Multi Level Costing in Detail
    thanking You

    While using material ledger, we can use the single level or multi-level price determination for valuation of inventory.
    Procurement processes are used in Product Cost Controlling to determine procurement costs and to present those costs. Purchase Order, for example, is single-level procurement and Production is multilevel procurement.
    Single-level material price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price and the cumulative single-level differences of the period are taken into account. Single-level material price determination takes into account the differences that arise directly when a material is procured.
    Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account.
    Single-level material price determination  is a prerequisite for Multi-level price determination.

  • Single Level MenuBar

    I have created a single level mx:menuBar. The question I have
    is how to obtain "menuitem" properties, in the example "child"

    Clicks on the top-level items will dispatch the "click"
    event, but not the "itemClick" event, so create a handler for

  • Single level and multi level price determination

    Regarding single level and multilevel price determination, how system is arriving the figure of some portion to single level and some portion to multilevel. Can any one clarify the concept.

    Find below my clarification.
    Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account. The material price calculated in multilevel price determination can be used for inventory valuation.
    Follwing are Prerequisites\
    The material ledger is active.
    Actual costing is active.
    The price determination indicator in the material master is set to 3.
    The price control indicator in the material master is set to S.
    Single-level price determination has been performed.
    Following are the fartures
    A level is identified by a material and its associated procurement process. Multiple levels are the result of one material being used in another material. These multiple levels are reflected in the actual BOM that is created in the costing run in the step Determine Sequence.
    In multilevel production, both single-level and multilevel price differences exist. If one material is used in another material, and single-level price differences exist for the input material, this results in multilevel price differences. In this way, differences are rolled up from raw materials through semifinished products to finished products. This solves the problem of follow-up costs.
    The price calculated through price determination is updated as a periodic unit price (V price) in the Accounting 1 view of the material master record The price control indicator remains set to S. The standard price does not change.

  • Tax error: Precedence Level: This Precedence level is already in use.

    Customer applied Vertex integration with Oracle Etax ,while update tax juristiction information and apply ,the error is out like below:
    Precedence Level: This Precedence level is already in use.
    You must create unique precedence levels for tax jurisdictions that apply to the same tax.
    Customer wonder precedence level logic .
    Is any one know about precedence level?

    This is usually because the drive letter assigned to the network share is taken by something else. Maybe, by a removable drive.
    Moderators and other answerers do their best to help specific cases, but everyone has their own situation.  Apply common sense to the replies you find in the forums.
    When you typed dir z:  - is Z: the drive letter you wanted for this share, or it was automatically assigned?
    -- pa
    Alternatively you could try using common sense when you post, as well as taking the time to read the entire issue post so that you can avoid showing both your ignorance and arrogance (arrogance without any competency to back it I might add).
    Suggesting that it might be "another drive" that took over the mapping shows your lack of reading comprehension and is unhelpful.   Please take the time to, once again, read first.
    Lastly moderators here generally show little technical skill beyond entering search words into a knowledge-base of articles and then applying the results incorrectly further exacerbating the situation for the customer.

  • Object Level Security,Data Level Security&Row level Security

    can anyone explain main difference between "Object Level Security,Data Level Security & Row Level Security " and how to implement.
    Thanks in advance,

    Hi Kumar
    Dashboards, Reports, Guided Navigation Links, Texts, briefing books are all Dashboard OBJECTS which are available at UI level of OBIEE..if you restrict them Say User 'A' wants to see 2 Dashboards and USer 'B' Wants to see 1 Dashboard....these settings & permission u r restricting in Object level called Object Level Security
    lly datalevel security is restriction of Data.. consider the same above example and User 'B" wants to see 2-3 regions data where as User A will see only Single Region Data..which you will do/restrict at logical tables, using variables..
    Row level security: refer this link, clearly explains you
    Please mark Correct or helpful if this clears

Maybe you are looking for