Aging report with intervals

Hi,
i want to create an aging report by business partner balance with the folowing intervals of aging periode.
4 columns with 0-120 days 120-180 days 180-360 days and older then 360 days
Is there somebody who can help me set this up.
I,am not using SBO 8.8 and don't want to upgrade yet
Thanks
Mark

hi M. Hageman     
the query is very long but i can tell you steps:
example : aging  to 31/08/2010
- AP Invoice before 31/08/2010 that are still open
-AP Invoice reconciled after >31/08/2010 for AP Invoice created <= 31/08/2010
-AP Credit Memo before 31/08/2010 that are still open (It should be credit memo without base doc)
-Reconciliation for Credit memo without base doc created before 31/08/2010 but reconciled after 31/08/2010
-outgoing payment created before 31/08/2010 but have Open Balance <> 0
-Outgoing payment da reconcile trong thoi gian >  31/08/2010 ma duoc tao ra < = 31/08/2010
-Incoming payment of vendor created before 31/08/2010 and still open
-incoming payment created before <= 31/08/2010 but reconciled >31/08/2010
-journal entry befor 31/07/2010 that are still open
- journal entry befor 31/07/2010 But reconciled >31/07/2010
thanks,
H2

Similar Messages

  • Need SAP BW AR Aging Report with R/3 Aging Report Should Match

    Hello All,
    Could you please let me know SAP Delivered AR Aging Report on BW Side should match with SAP R/3 AR Aging Report for a given Customer.
    When I ran the report on BW Side I am able to match the report values with InfoProvider Values and also with RSA3 Extractor (0FI_AR_4).
    But when i tried to compare BW report with ECC Report values are not Matching at a given Customer Number.
    Please explain the best practice to match the values of BW Standard Aging report with ECC standard AR aging report.
    Thanks,
    Geetha

    Hi,
    I am actually running the SAP Delivered Report in BW.
    So I didn't changed any thing in report.
    I m running the report in ECC using s_alr_87016128 tcode.
    Still I m getting the amount difference.
    I have checked at customer level with company code and Key date.
    Can i get inputs on these.
    ECC Report s_alr_87012168
    BW Report:0FIAR_C03_Q0005
    Thanks,
    Geetha

  • Stock Aging report with current date

    Dear Experts
    Can we able to take stock aging report with current date?
    Thanks&Regards,
    Vinoth Raj K

    You're posting in the Portuguese B1 space.
    You might want to post in the English one: SAP Business One Application

  • Shelf ageing report with qty and value

    hi
    i want shelf ageing report with stock value and stock quantity together.
    or any other way to club together the reports which will having stock qty and stock value

    Hi,
        How about TRC:MB5M( Expiration Date List).   But the function is qty only.
       Maybe you have to make add on program.
    Regards,
       Gaito

  • Aging report with different intervals

    Hi,
    i want to create an aging report by business partner balance with the folowing intervals of aging periode.
    4 columns with 0-120 days  120-180 days 180-360 days and older then 360 days
    Is there somebody who can help me set this up.
    Thanks
    Mark

    Not yet possible because of some not tested processes.
    First we do an upgrade to latest PL of 2007A
    The reason to do a upgrade to SBO 8.8 is indeed the improved aging criterias
    So if you have a nice query which fullfills our need would be great
    Thanks
    Mark

  • Aging Report with Customer/Vendor Ref. No. should allow backdate

    Aging Reports for Suppliers and Customers.
    The current printing of the aging reports using Sales Document tab or the Purchase Document tab does not tie with the GL balances when the dates are backdated. It is important that the detail aging report to show the customer/ vendor ref. no.
    There are times when urgent outgoing/ incoming payment are entered into the system for the current period when the vendor detail aging reports or the customer statement with the customer/ vendor ref. no is not ready to be printed for the previous period.
    By allow backdating, it gives the users much needed flexibility in creating the transactions into SAP Business One without having to wait till all the previous month financial reporting is finalized. This is especially important during the financial year end.
    Current Workaround: None.

    Hello,
    Thank you for your input. The limitation is solved in 2007 A / 2007 B version as a part of new Internal Reconciliation concept.
    Regards,
    Peter Dominik
    Solution Manager
    B1 Product Definition Team

  • [2007A] - [8.81] Aging report with passed due date invoices in 120+ column

    Hello,
    My database contains invoices due in october 2010.
    When I run the aging report, the amount of the invoice is not in column 0-30 but in column 120+
    When I run the dunning wizard, these invoice are not included.
    i tried to look all the parameter without success. Any idea why I have these invoice in this column ? Please let me know if you need more information to understand my issue.
    I also tried to run the report in 8.81, and teh problem remain the same
    Thank you for you help
    Sébastien

    Gordon,
    OK you're right, I didn't read well this report, and I was confused with the fact that these invoices were not in the dunning wizard result.
    So yes, the aging report is correct, but my issue was the dunning wizard, and I realize these invoices have a dunning level in the installment higher than the max dunning level of my dunning terms.
    So thank you for your answer, it lead me to look at the real problem!
    Sébastien

  • Stock ageing report with batch Management active

    Hi Experts,
    My client wants a Stock ageing report and batch management is active
    According to my client, Inventory ageing report should show stock quantities and stock value as follows,
    1. Below one year
    2. Between one and two years
    3. Above two years
    What are the table and fields to be considered for this report.
    Thanks
    NDS

    What steps do you mean? taking an ABAP course and doing it yourself, or stepping to an ABAPer and let him know what he shall do?
    you asked for a stock report, not for a movement report.
    If I go into my warehouse and looking at all the stuff sitting there and want a report that should tell me how old this stuff is, then i am not intrested if there was a goods receipt movement.
    However I would like to know the last movement date. In this case you have to look into table S032 or into the movements MSEG (with MKPF as header table)

  • AP aging Report with Aging Period as parameter

    HI all ,
    It's required from me to make AP aging period report with parameters including Aging periods as parameter so that the user will have list of value with the aging periods avaialable & he should choose from them .
    Based on that
    the columns with the period starting & ending periods will be varied (dynamic) up on the period chosen .
    The required is to get the invoice amount under each related column ............ is that possible & if yes please just guide me with the idea as the many ideas that i got is calculating the amounts with the period as statically behavior ...
    Thanks alot

    is there something missing in my requirments

  • R3 AR aging report with partial payment need FBL5N

    Hi, does anyone have AR aging report list NET BALANCE for each invoice for AR Aging report?  I tried FBL5N which did not apply partial payment to each invoice, customer would not want to see this kind of report and we did in Excel for all open invoices which just waste time only.  
    We do not have BW or Crystal report but need to know which canned report can be used for us to send statement.  Tks.
    SAP R3 ECC 6.0 user.

    Hi,
    I am actually running the SAP Delivered Report in BW.
    So I didn't changed any thing in report.
    I m running the report in ECC using s_alr_87016128 tcode.
    Still I m getting the amount difference.
    I have checked at customer level with company code and Key date.
    Can i get inputs on these.
    ECC Report s_alr_87012168
    BW Report:0FIAR_C03_Q0005
    Thanks,
    Geetha

  • Query issue---Aging report with Net due

    Hello Gurus,
    I am just stuck very badly with a report requirement. The reports has billing doc and item with amount aggregated under different age buckets.
    Ex:
    Bill doc-0000000001;item-10; aged bucket 10-20days-- -100
    Bill doc-0000000001;item-20; aged bucket 30-40days-- 1000
    remember that these are two different rows and columns. The user wants to see the net amount due for 30-40 days i.e 1000-100=900 not 1000.
    How do I achieve this?
    Thanks
    Simmi

    Technically the report is correct, the amount of due 10-20 days is -100 while the amount due for 30-40 days is 1000 where the sum is 900. The only problem is the aging dates and line item number if you get ride of them then you will get 900 which is correct but if you drill down by date the report is correct. There is no way to achieve what they want if you have to display the line item number. Tell them this is correct.
    thanks.
    Wond

  • AR Aging Report does not change with Posting, Due, and Document selections

    It appears to me that when you run the AR Aging report with the same date ranges in each of the date selection fields, Posting, Due and Doument, you do not get a different display of aging buckets.  Does this report always display data based on Due Date?

    Hi Bill,
    When you run the AR Aging report change "Age by" option and check aging buckets are changing or not it has to change.
    Thanks,
    Sachin

  • Aging Report display

    Version: (Please provide the current version)
    SBO 8.8 Patch: 10
    Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
    In mentioned patch level, the result/outstanding balance of Aging Report in System Currency was difference when selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' or not. The outstanding balance should be be same on both selection.  
    Valid as of: (Date that this legal requirement is applicable)
    N/A
    Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the functionality is not realized)
    If the Aging Report cannot disppay the outstanding documetns for reconcile with customer, they cannot check with customers.
    Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
    Generate the Aging report in  System Currency
    selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' including all transactions and balance is same as Trail Balance
    un-selected 'Display Receoncilied Transactions' does not inclding the transactions that Local Currency is zero amount, but System Currency is not zero. The outstanding balance is different to the result of the above selection and Trail Balance as well.
    Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at the moment)
    Print the Aging Report with selected ' Display Reconcilied Transactions' to show ALL transactions to reconcile the transactions.
    Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should work)
    selected 'Display Reconciled Transactions' or not, the outstanding balance should be the same.

    Hi Kit,
    The problem was not solved yet, even I posted DFQ.
    Best regards,
    Michael

  • Aging Report Problem

    Dear all SAP expert,
    I have a question about aging report for business partner. I want to know what is the difference between Aging Report with option "display reconciled transaction" check and Aging report with un check option "display reconciled transaction" ?
    If I compared with Balance sheet, the report that has same balance with Balance sheet is Aging Report with option "display reconciled transaction" check but in this report include all transaction like Invoice, Incoming payment etc that's make aging report contain all transaction. I want to use the other aging report with uncheck option that show only open transaction but it has difference balance with balance sheet.
    Why it's different ?
    Thanks for yiur kind help

    What parameters are you using to extract the GL balance? Use no From date, and a To date that is the same as the To Date in your Balance Sheet report.
    In the aging report, make sure you are using the same posting date to date as the aging date, and have no Posting date from, so you are not excluding any transactions.
    If you are finding your balance from drilling to Account Balance in the Chart of Accounts, make sure you are viewing all transactions, not just unreconciled transactions, as this will exclude items reconciled after the required date.
    I know there was a bug with this early on in 2007A, but I'm sure it was fixed before PL30

  • AR AGING REPORT. Why 'BalDueDeb' minus 'BalDueCred' not same as Balance?

    Dear All,
    I am trying to build SQL which mimics the AR Aging Report in SAP B1 8.8. Reason is to add additional fields needed by Management. I get the SAME TOTAL as Ageing, but when I run my query, I can't get the same no. of rows as Aging.
    Aging has 700 rows (NOT display reconciled transactions), and my aim is to get the same no. of rows.
    Case I: When I use: WHERE (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) != 0
    I get 816 rows. All zero balances are eliminated, but it seems that some transactions which have been reconciled appear in my report as outstanding debits and also credits. This is why it has more rows than Aging, although total is correct.
    Case II: When I use: WHERE Balance !=0
    I get 5026 rows. Many rows show zero balances. I don't understand why they are not eliminated. I thought the 2 commands were equivalent.
    But the good news is that when I export to Excel and delete all those zero rows, I get exactly 700 rows, same as Aging!
    Same total, same no. of rows!
    If anybody could help me complete my query, I can continue. How can I eliminate these rows having zero balances? Where have I gone wrong?
    Thanks a lot.
    Leon Lai
    =========================================================================================
    SELECT distinct
    T1.CardCode,
    T1.CardName,
    T0.RefDate,
    CASE 
               WHEN T0.TransType=13 THEN 'IN'
               WHEN T0.TransType=14 THEN 'CN'
               WHEN T0.TransType=30 THEN 'JE'
               WHEN T0.TransType=24 THEN 'RC'
               WHEN T0.TransType=46 THEN 'PS'
               ELSE 'Error ! ! ! !'
    END AS 'Document Type',
    T0.Ref1 'Document Number',
    CASE 
               WHEN T0.TransType=13 THEN 'IN' + T0.Ref1
               WHEN T0.TransType=14 THEN 'CN' + T0.Ref1
               WHEN T0.TransType=30 THEN 'JE' + T0.Ref1
               WHEN T0.TransType=24 THEN 'RC' + T0.Ref1
               WHEN T0.TransType=46 THEN 'PS' + T0.Ref1
               ELSE 'Error ! ! ! !'
    END AS 'Concat',
    T0.Account,
    T0.Line_ID AS 'Row',
    T0.BalDueDeb,
    T0.BalDueCred,
    T0.TransId AS 'Id JDT1',
    (T0.BalDueDeb- T0.BalDueCred) AS 'Balance'
    FROM JDT1 T0 inner join ocrd t1 on t0.Shortname = t1.CardCode
    WHERE T1.CardType = 'C'
    PROBLEM IS HERE--??????????????--
    --and (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) != 0       
    and Balance != 0
    -- The query gives different results depending on which of the above lines is run. Why?
    PROBLEM IS HERE--??????????????--
    ORDER BY T1.CardCode, T0.RefDate, T0.Ref1

    Dear Gordon,
    Thanks for your reply, and sorry for the incomplete reply which went beyond my control.
    Here are my results using WHERE (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) !=0
    I have compared Aging Report with SQL Query.
    Doc Type  Aging Rows         Aging Total     SQL Rows    SQL Total*
    CN            57        -214,315.34     57        -214,315.34
    IN           452       4,741,436.41     452       4,741,436.41
    JE           134         202,209.56     267         201,584.56
    PS            12         107,652.40     18         121,352.40
    RC             4        -107,168.04     10        -120,243.04
               659       4,729,815.00     804        4,729,815.00
    The results are messy, time consuming to generate and investigate. Too much for newbee!
    The main differences lie in JE; about x2 rows in SQL Query.
    This may be due to rows that have reconciled in Aging, but appear in SQL Query.
    I have also prepared a list of Doc. Nos where there are differences, but too lengthy.
    TO Help you understand what's happening the foll. remarks may help:
    (1) The T0.Ref1 'Document Number' is empty for all JE. However, for other Doc types, these exist and agree with Aging.
    (2) Although 'Document Number' is empty for JE, there is a column Ref1 which does give a reference which agrees with Aging
    (3) A specific document always has 1 row in Aging, but may have several rows in my query
    (4) I do not know why using:  WHERE Balance !=0 works, but it does give a near perfect result. Why not use this as starting point? After deleting all the zero rows which it cannot delete, I GET EXACTLY the same result as SAP B1 8.8 Report 'Aged Analysis of Debtors'. Same no. of rows, Same total. How to delete these zeros in SQL?
    (5) In SAP B1 forum, it seems many persons still cannot arrive at the official Aging. I maybe near the correct solution, but no idea why it works.
    (6) I am continuing the struggle - maybe I need to put a sub query to eliminate the zeros first?
    Thanks
    Leon Lai

Maybe you are looking for