Alternate access mapping and binding in IIS for NLB nodes(2)

Hello All,
We have configured NLB for 2 nodes( 1 is App and WFE1 and 2 is WFE2).
here, we have given NLB host name to the users to browse. but, do we need to configure any thing in alternate access mapping and in IIS bindings, if yes, Please elaborate step by step please.
Thanks in advance
NLB host name and IP: abc.ap.company.com /10.11.12.95
Node1 server: abc.appri.company.com / 10.11.12.93
Node2 server: abc.appsec.company.com / 10.11.12.94
how to do this.
NARLA

Assuming you configured the web application to use the URL http://abc.ap.company.com there is no additional IIS configuration needed on the servers.
If you're interested in accessing a specific server you can create a hostfile entry on your client machine that abc.ap.company.com to one of the two servers.
Jason Warren
@jaspnwarren
jasonwarren.ca
habaneroconsulting.com/Insights

Similar Messages

Alternate Access Mapping not working for Zone : Intranet

One of our client want to set Alternate Access Mappint (intranet) with url "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address.
is it possible?
subsequest to my previous question (
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/3f39711e-301a-40e8-aa7a-855fa2c268b1/alternate-access-mapping-not-working?forum=sharepointadmin )
I want to ask one more question
Can we configure "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address for any other zone?
or
If there is ".com" within the url then it can't be configured for InTRAnet?
Thanks
S H A J A N

The names for the zones don't matter. You could use the 'extranet' zone for another intranet name if you wanted, the names are just to make it a bit more friendly for beginners.
What you describe sounds routine, you create a web application with a name, then use an AAM to allow users to access it with a more friendly name. Frequently you end up creating
http://intranet.domain.com and
http://intranet as an AAM, or vice versa.
You can use .com for an intranet site, you would need to add the site as an A Host record in your DNS server so that traffic is sent to your internal server rather than out into the wider world.

Alternate Access Mapping Issue

This is probably pretty simple, but I can't seem to figure this one out. I have an alternate access mapping setup. I can get to
http://sharepoint, but
http://sharepoint.domain.com asks for credentials and gives me a 401 Unauthorized
message.
Where should I be looking to resolve this?

So when setting an AAM, it does not set the IIS binding. In order to set the IIS binding, you would need to remove the Web Application from the IIS site (alternatively, add the IIS binding manually).
Because you are adding a . in the URL, you will be prompted for credentials. If using NTLM, it should just go through. If using Kerberos, there will be additional steps -- so is the Web App configured with NTLM or Kerberos?
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Unknow URLs getting reported in Alternate access mapping errors

Alternate access mappings have not been configured. Users or services are accessing the site << site name >> with the URL https://cgi.im.qq.com. This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users. If this is expected,
add the URL https://cgi.im.qq.com as an AAM response URL. For more information, see: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=114854"/>
Question: Now I don't know this URL but somehow I am seeing many URL like these coming once or twice during night time. Is somebody trying to do DNS Spoofing on the machine> or hacking of any sort? I did not had much help on the internet?

Hi,
This issue may be due to some users access the site with URL
https://cgi.im.qq.com or users use services to access the site with URL
https://cgi.im.qq.com.
I recommend to check if this URL has been added to the IIS(Internet Information Services) binding of the web application.
If you want to avoid such errors, you need to add the URL
https://cgi.im.qq.com to Alternate Access Mapping of the web application or remove such bindings from IIS.
More references:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/f9cfd933-58a0-4715-963a-afba54f7c720/odd-url-causing-alternative-access-mapping-warnings?forum=sharepointadminprevious
http://samirvaidya.blogspot.com/2011/03/alternate-access-mappings.html
Best regards.
Thanks
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Alternate Access Mapping not working

I am trying to configure alternate access mapping in sp2013.
My default url for site is https://intranet
My client has given a url https://intranet.theirDomain.com
When I ping "intranet.theirDomain.com" on their local machine it is returning IP: 192.168.0.87
When I ping "intranet", it is giving IP: 192.168.0.86
I have edited the Public Zone URL as follows
Default: https://intranet
Intranet: https://intranet.theirDomain.com
In IIS the following bindings are there.
https intranet 443 *
https intranet.theirDomain.com 443 *
But still https://intranet.theirDomain.com is not working
https://intranet is working.
I hope all are configured correctly.
Or doing any wrong? please guide me.
S H A J A N

It sounds like the 'intranet' A record in the theirDomain.com zone isn't pointed at the correct IP address (192.168.0.86).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Alternate access mapping SP2010

Hello,
we have internal team sites based on SP2010. Now we already have 5 AAM mapping entries tied with each zone. So question is can I add one more entry to AAM? If yes then I have to used the one of the zone which alreayd used. Will that be ok?
Please help!
Thanks,

Hi,
For SharePoint Alternate Access Mapping,you need to understand the following basics:
Internal URL redirects or transforms to a
Public URL, from left, to right. The URL on the left, is what you enter in the address field in your browser, the
Public URL on the right is what you will see once there, this goes for visible and invisible links as well.
Internal URL format: Protocol + URL (+non default port)
Public URL is the address of the Web Application for one of the five zones available. The ‘Default’ must be filled out and has some special properties/uses, the other four are optional. You can only have five
Public URL’s per Web Application.
This is the URL that the browser will be redirected to in the end.
Public URL format: Protocol + URL (+non default port)
Zone is a label representing a
Public URL, the zone is used to ‘connect’ an Internal URL to a
Public URL.
Multiple internal URLs can be associated with a single public URL. Mapping collections can contain up to five authentication zones. But each zone can have only a single public URL.
So you can add multiple internal URLs mapping one zone, but each zone can have only one public URL.
Reference:
http://blog.blksthl.com/2012/12/03/a-guide-to-alternate-access-mappings-basics-in-sharepoint-2013/
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/The-final-guide-to-551bd75b
Best Regards,
Eric
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Alternate Access Mapping Problem

I have one site that keeps giving me numerous warnings in the Event Viewer. Event 8059, SharePoint Foundation.
Alternate access mappings have not been configured. Users or services are accessing the site http://investigator.domain.com:12151 with the URL http://investigator.domain.com:12151. This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned
to users. If this is expected, add the URL http://investigator.domain.com:12151 as an AAM response URL. For more information, see: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=114854"/>
The http://investigator.domain.com:12151 is setup as the Default Authentication Provider and http://investigator.domain.com has been extended to Intranet. This also displays in the Configure Alternate Access Mapping so it appears correct.
Yet the above error continually repeats it self.
How can I get rid of it?

what is your AAM settings are?
is this url in the AAM or not http://investigator.domain.com:12151?
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

Cannot open web address by doing Alternate Access Mapping

Dear SharePoint Expert,
I setup testing environment in internal network, I create the web&site collection by using http://demo01 (it's the machine name). I already test site, it's ok.
But when I alternate access mapping by edit internal url to common web address, It maps to http://eOffice.local
but It's show Pop-up to login. I try to login many times. It's not work, and it didn't show anything.
What happened?
Please help to suggest

Hi,
Do you mean that the credential dialgo poped up 3 times then show blank page when you log with your credential?
please try disabling loopbackcheck on your SharePoint server, then check if it could work.
http://blog.blksthl.com/2013/05/07/a-quick-guide-to-configuring-the-loopback-check/
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/896861?wa=wsignin1.0
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

N96 - GPS local maps and voice guided navi for 3 m...

I see on the box of the N96 :
"Including local maps and voice-guided navigation for three months"
So after 3 months there is no local maps and voice ?
Why that ?
Even a cheap GPS at 100 euros has maps and voice forever
I dont understand. I have paid the phone and his features or not ?

I have to disagree with you there.
The system is designed to suit all users, not just those that use the phone for navigation in the car. Plus many people won't use the phone for navigation but will use it as an interactive map book.
Also with all the new and upcoming location based services that nokia now offers it is very important to have up-to-date maps.
If we had to pay for map updates then many of the location based services wouldn't be accurate or worth using.
So for a phone based navigation program it makes much more sense to get free maps. Obviously they have to recoup the map costs from somewhere so they have to charge for the navigation feature.
For dedicated in car sat-nav systems such as tom toms then it makes sense for them to give you the navigation for free. They make their money by charging you for new maps and maps for other countries.
So in some ways nokia's system is better because you have maps of most of the world totally free. It's also the only system that could suit the majority.
At the end of the day no one is forcing you to use nokia maps either. If you don't like it then install a program like garmin XT. This program is like in car sat-navs where navigation is free but you pay for maps. A very expensive option if you travel to many countries.
Message Edited by psychomania on 07-Oct-2008 08:45 AM

Site Collection Alternate Access Mapping

I have 1 web application with 2 site collections.
Web Application url - http://contoso.bc.com.au
Host named Site Collection 1 - http://contoso1.bc.com.au
Host named Site Collection 2 - http://contoso2.bc.com.au
All 3 use the same custom masterpage with navigation in the top bar to go to each site.
In my Event Logs, I see this error
Alternate access mappings have not been configured. Users or services are accessing the site http://contoso.bc.com.au with the URL http://contoso2.bc.com.au. This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users. If this is expected,
add the URL http://contoso2.bc.com.au as an AAM response URL.
I don't get the error with http://contoso1.bc.com.au
My current alternate access mappings
http://contoso.bc.com.au Default
https://contoso.bc.com.au Internet
How can I fix this?
Thank you
Yoshi

Hi Yoshi,
This issue seems to be about the host-named site collection 2. Please make sure that after you created the new hostname site collection 2, you had mapped it to a specific zone.
There are some articles for configuring host-named site collections, please take a look at:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc424952(v=office.15).aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/russmax/archive/2013/10/31/guide-to-sharepoint-2013-host-name-site-collections.aspx
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Mapping and querying Custom Objects for a Contact with REST Api

Hello All,
We are hoping to get some details on managing DataCard set through REST APIs. Our implementation goal is to create Contacts and add Custom object for each Contact, or to be precise, add a DataCard Set for each Contact.
At the moment, to associate a DataCard Set (or Custom Object) to an existing contact, we are supplying following custom object fields during creation of Custom Object:
new CustomObjectField
                                                                name = "MappedEntityType",
                                                                dataType = Enum.GetName(typeof(DataType), DataType.numeric),
                                                                type = "CustomObjectField",
                                                                defaultValue = "0"
                                                         new CustomObjectField
                                                                name = "MappedEntityID",
                                                                dataType = Enum.GetName(typeof(DataType), DataType.numeric),
                                                                type = "CustomObjectField",
                                                                defaultValue = "<ContactId>"
Is this the correct approach? This is Based on the information provided here: http://topliners.eloqua.com/community/code_it/blog/2012/05/31/eloqua-api-how-to-mapping-a-data-card-to-an-entity.
Would the REST API allow us to query the CustomObjects using the MappedEntityId value for later updates? If so, any pointers on how we approach that?
Thanks in ad.

Either the MappedEntityID field is not available or I do it wrong, Eloqua is ignoring the field and does not map the custom record with the unique Contact ID
{"type":"CustomObjectData","ContactID":"8829509","fieldValues":[{"id":"195","value":"[email protected]"},{"id":"220","value":"a0KJ000000387QvMAI"},{"id":"191","value":"001J000001OrL77IAF"},{"id":"193","value":"NowTV MPP"},{"id":"194","value":"8829509"},{"id":"196","value":"Andreas"},{"id":"197","value":"Wolf"},{"id":"198","value":"003J00000145lkBIAQ"},{"id":"210","value":"777666555"},{"id":"199","value":"gbp"},{"id":"200","value":"0"},{"id":"215","value":"0"},{"id":"201","value":"999111999"},{"id":"214","value":"111111"},{"id":"202","value":"222222"},{"id":"204","value":"now"},{"id":"203","value":"xmas"},{"id":"205","value":"no description"},{"id":"206","value":"test"},{"id":"218","value":"holidays"},{"id":"219","value":"PPV-0878545"},{"id":"213","value":"N"},{"id":"212","value":"myself"},{"id":"209","value":"now tv"},{"id":"192","value":"1417542120"},{"id":"207","value":"1417542120"},{"id":"216","value":"1417542240"},{"id":"217","value":"1417542240"},{"id":"211","value":"1417542240"}]},"MappedEntityID":"003J00000145lkBIAQ"}
Response
DEBUG|Response------{"type":"CustomObjectData","id":"81720","fieldValues":[{"id":"195","value":"[email protected]"},{"id":"220","value":"a0KJ000000387QvMAI"},{"id":"191","value":"001J000001OrL77IAF"},{"id":"193","value":"NowTV MPP"},{"id":"194","value":"8829509"},{"id":"196","value":"Andreas"},{"id":"197","value":"Wolf"},{"id":"198","value":"003J00000145lkBIAQ"},{"id":"210","value":"777666555"},{"id":"199","value":"gbp"},{"id":"200","value":"0"},{"id":"215","value":"0"},{"id":"201","value":"999111999"},{"id":"214","value":"111111"},{"id":"202","value":"222222"},{"id":"204","value":"now"},{"id":"203","value":"xmas"},{"id":"205","value":"no description"},{"id":"206","value":"test"},{"id":"218","value":"holidays"},{"id":"219","value":"PPV-0878545"},{"id":"213","value":"N"},{"id":"212","value":"myself"},{"id":"209","value":"now tv"},{"id":"192","value":"1417542120"},{"id":"207","value":"1417542120"},{"id":"216","value":"1417542240"},{"id":"217","value":"1417542240"},{"id":"211","value":"1417542240"}]}
Eloqua:
Name: PPV-0878545
Unique Code: a0KJ000000387QvMAI
Status Registered
Created Date 12/22/2014 12:44:49 PM
Mapped NO
Any Idea how to map this to a contact
Entity Type is Contacts
Entity Field is SFDC Contact ID

Can't access photos and videos from Library for uploading to net or iMovie

I've been downloading my pics from my Nikon L18 for the last 6 months but cannot access them from the library itself; for instance if I'm trying to upload a pic onto Facebook or trying to import my videos into iMovie. When I'm in iPhoto I can see the pics through my albums, but they won't show up under Events or Library. Am I importing something incorrectly?

If you can see photos in an Album then they are in the Library. Events and Photos are just different ways of viewing the Library. It’s simply not possible to see pics in an Album that are not in a Library.
Or are you trying to access files in the Finder?
Try these in order - from best option on down...
1. Do you have an up-to-date back up? If so, try copy the library6.iphoto file from the back up to the iPhoto Library (Right Click -> Show Package Contents) allowing it to overwrite the damaged file.
2. Download iPhoto Library Manager and use its rebuild function. This will create a new library based on data in the albumdata.xml file. Not everything will be brought over - no slideshows, books or calendars, for instance - but it should get all your albums and keywords back.
Because this process creates an entirely new library and leaves your old one untouched, it is non-destructive, and if you're not happy with the results you can simply return to your old one.
3. If neither of these work then you'll need to create and populate a new library.
To create and populate a new *iPhoto 08* library:
Note this will give you a working library with the same Events and pictures as before, however, you will lose your albums, keywords, modified versions, books, calendars etc.
In the iPhoto Preferences -> Events Uncheck the box at 'Imported Items from the Finder'
Move the iPhoto Library to the desktop
Launch iPhoto. It will ask if you wish to create a new Library. Say Yes.
Go into the iPhoto Library (Right Click -> Show Package Contents) on your desktop and find the Originals folder. From the Originals folder drag the individual Event Folders to the iPhoto Window and it will recreate them in the new library.
When you're sure all is well you can delete the iPhoto Library on your desktop.
In the future, in addition to your usual back up routine, you might like to make a copy of the library6.iPhoto file whenever you have made changes to the library as protection against database corruption.
Regards
TD

Mapping and creating new instances of a node and its sub-nodes

hi,
i need to map every 3 items from source interface to 1 in target interface.
i have on target interface parent node which is called 'item' and occurs 0..unbounded (and other sub-nodes).
this node have a sub-node which is called 'item_data' and occurs 0..3.
i created a mapping:
source_item ->counter->checking mod 3--->if
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" source_item -
> then -
>item.
when i test mapping with 1-3 source_item the sub-nodes 'item_data' are created,
but when i try 4-5 and more , 'item' node is created twice but the second instance has no sub-nodes of
'item_data' (it has other sub-nodes).
can someone tell me how to solve my problem?
thanks in advance.
Tomer

I would like to be clear about the requirement first,
Source                              Target
item           -
>             item
   item_data     -
>               Item_data
item           -
>
   item_data     -
>               irem_data
item           -
>
   item_data     -
>               item_data
item           -
>             item
   item_data     -
>               item_data
item           -
>
   item_data     -
>               item_data
item           -
>
   item_data     -
>               item_data
for the mapping of item node the queue should look like:
contextchange
Then for the mapping of item_data the queue should look like:
item_data
item_data
item_data
context change
item_data
item_data
item_data
I guess you have used some udf for the target parent node (item) mapping. I am trying myself to generate the queue for item_data using standard functions, but yet to come up with the desired result. If achieved will let you know..................for now it seems that writing a UDF (queue) would be the best approach.
iterate through the input queue array (source item_data values all in same context using RemoveContext) and insert a ResultList.CC after every third element in the array.
Hope you can come out easily with the java for this logic. Let me know if it's helpful.
Regards,
Suddha

My Site Links Not Working When Using Alternate Access Mapping

I have a SharePoint Site Collection under my main
Web Application: mywebapp:80.
I had to extend this to an Intranet zone
Web Application: mywebapp:101.
I am able to open my Site Collection from either address. The authentication protocols for both are the same.
When provisioning the User Profile Service and configuring
My Site, the
My Site Host Location must be supplied, in this case: http://mywebapp:80/personal/mysite
I housed my My Site Host under the same Web Application as my
Site Collection.
When accessing My Site for any given user from mywebapp:80, all the links of user photos point to that same
Web Application, which is expected.
i.e. When on http://mywebapp:80/personal/mysite/person.aspx?accountname=person1 , all the links of photos of other users are http://mywebapp:80/personal/mysite/person.aspx?accountname=person2,
etc.
When accessing My Site for any given user from my extension, mywebapp:101, all the links of user photos still point to the old address.
i.e. When on http://mywebapp:101/personal/mysite/person.aspx?accountname=person1 , all the links of photos of other users are still on http://mywebapp:80/personal/mysite/person.aspx?accountname=person2,
etc.
So I figured that the My Site Host configuration under the
User Profile Service will just literally follow the initial URL specified. That said, I ask:
1.) Is there no way that the My Site links will be able to adjust depending on the URL I am accessing it from?
2.) What are possible implementation alternatives for cases like this when I need to use
My Site under 1
Web Application and have to make it available on
multiple host names?

Hi Noel,
perhaps this thread is similar with your question:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/d3010532-ae20-4eda-8f58-359f77d17e1e/user-profile-pictures-pointing-to-old-mysitehost?forum=sharepointadminprevious
any way, for your 2 questions,
perhaps you can give us more details about the scenario?
as i know,
mysite able to adjust, but you may need to configure the the host of the mysite, for example:
1. to the User Profile Service Application (UPA) and changed the MySite URL, few sites show the new URL and few show the old one.
2. to Central Admin and found there may 2-UPAs created.
3. changed the MySite settings on both the UPAs, created Managed Paths wherever necessary and then changed associations of all web applications to one of the main UPA
for configuring the multiple host, you may check with your IIS, and add the bindings,
http://forums.iis.net/t/1189870.aspx
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14232892/multiple-sites-under-the-same-hostname-possible
Regards,
Aries
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Shared folders (Windows file shares) show access denied and do not prompt for credentials

Scenario:
Like other admins, I log on and work as a 'standard user' (usera) with no admin rights anywhere in the domain, to perform admin tasks I have another account (userb) which I authenticate with as and when required. userb has been allocated/delegated permissions
as required.
Problem:
When trying to connect to shared folders on servers (2008 R2) using a UNC patch via Windows Explorer (Win 7 Ent.), I see an access denied error and do not get an option to supply alternative credentials.
If I try to connect to the admin shares on the same server (\\server\C$ or \\server\e$) I get an access denied message AND get prompted for credentials. I supply my admin account and gain access as expected.
If I check share and storage management when attempting to connect, I see that Windows is trying to connect me to each share as usera (which has no access). I understand why I get access denied at this point, but not why it can't just prompt me to supply an
account that does have access. When trying the admin shares I also see the usera account, but I get a prompt to supply a user who does have access.
Share permissions on the folders are for example 'Everyone' Full Control. NTFS permissions are 'userb' has modify (read, execute, list, traverse etc) via a 'Server Admins' AD Universal security group.
Note: If I do a NET USE from CMD and use the /USER switch, I can access the shares fine. But this is not great for accessing shared folders on the fly from various computers.
How can I get the other shares on the server to prompt me, rather than just say access denied?
Many thanks.

Try to disable guest user from the server
If you found this post helpful, please give it a "Helpful" vote. If it answered your question, remember to mark it as an "Answer". This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights! Always test ANY
suggestion in a test environment before implementing!

Alternate access mapping and binding in IIS for NLB nodes(2)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for