An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system

Hello Experts,
I am trying post goods receipt in EWM system in a simple inbound delivery process. It is not getting posted back in ECC. I have my RFC connection setup properly(I assume since I was able to transfer inbound delivery to EWM in first place).It seems some setting related to Outbound queue in EWM is missing.Can anyone tell me in detail what settings are required?Is it something to do with WE20 transaction?I am not sure what settings should be done there.The error log is as below-
An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system
SB3CLNT011
Message No. B1550
Diagnosis
An RFC destination should be specified for the logical system SB3CLNT011.
This could not be done in this case. SB3CLNT011 is not your local logical system
and this system is not included in the relevant Customizing tables.
Procedure
Check:
RFC
destination
Port
definitions
oubound partner profile of
message type SYNCH for this logical system
Regards,
Khushboo

Hi Oritra and Suraj,
I have checked remote connection in SM59 for both the logical system.It works fine.I understand this is more of a technical issue,but I don't have A local basis team to help me so reaching out to experts here.Can you guide me what technical settings could be checked for EWM-->ECC connection?When I execute BD82 for SB3CLNT011 it shows me green status with message "No messages have been defined for the selection conditions in the model".
Although when I do this for EWM logical system SB3CLNT012 it shows me this with all green status-
System SB3CLNT011 as a partner type already exists
System SB3CLNT012 as a partner type already exists
Port A000000018 with RFC destination SB3CLNT011 already exists
Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE01 already
Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLICA SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLI
Outbound parameters for message type SYNCH SYNCHRON already exist
Am I missing something in WE20?
Regards,
Khushboo

Similar Messages

RFC destination Could not be SPecified for Logical System

Hello there
i am traying to costomize Transaction Luancher for some of the report which is been devloped in ECC (wich is ARD 100)
when on Transaction launcher Wizard--> techincal
i am having a logical system as ARD100(my r.3 system where report is devloped and which is connected to CRM )
while chosing the OBJ.TYpe :   and Method:
it says shows three erroe :
1) RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system ARD100
2) Object type and Method is not available
i have checked RFC , in SM59 entriesu2026u2026 There is an RFC named ARD100 and the connection test works. I also did an authorization test and it also works. I also checked to make sure the logical system name ARD100 exists
could you please help me to resolved the same
Regards
Rajiv

Hi Rajeev,
In a system landscape it's important and necessary to use the logical system names consistently throughout all systems!
Therefore please make sure, that you always use the same name for a logical system in all systems (CRM and R/3 systems).
The following steps are required before a RFC call is made from the CRM system to the R/3 system :
    o Use transaction SM59 to create an RFC destinations for the remote
       system.
    o Use transaction BD54 to create the logical system.
    o Use transaction BD97 to link the RFC destination created in SM59
       with the logical system created in BD54.
I hope this helps.
Best Regards
Gavin

Error "codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system"

Hi,
we use the idoc-adapter to send message from mySAP ERP to PI.
All worked fine.
So, this morning I have changed the datatype of the messageId from "char" to "int" in mySAP ERP in the customizing menue (install param). So, no message received in SAP PI.
When I start transction "we05" in mySAPERP" I get the following error:
"codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system" status 02.
I have changed the datatyp to "char" but the same probleme
Can anybody help me please?
Regards
Stefan

This error shouldn't occur unless there is some modification at the OS level codepages.
Please check the entried in the RFC destination for connecting to the XI system. Unicode settings.
Regards,
Prateek

RFC Destination could not be created in TREX administration tool

Hi All,
Recently i installed the TREX server, I am trying to connect the ABAP system with the RFC connection. I entered all necessary data for the RFC connection it giving error as
RFC Destination could not be created.
To solve the above problem i created one RFC connection of type TCP/IP in ABAP server eventhough it is not solved.
Can i have the solution for the above problem?
Regards,
Vivek.

Hi Michale,
Thanks for your quick response; I tried all the mentioned possibilities in that help document, still i am facing the same problem.
It is giving the below error
Connect to SAP System failed.Possible reasons:
-Logon data incorrect
-Password is not uppercase(must also be uppercase)
-SAP system user locked
-SAP user not in specified client
-SAP User rights are insufficient
-SAP system not reachable
-saprfc.ini unavailable or entries incorrect
-TREXTcpipClient.ini section[communication],parameters rfcdestination, sapsystem not set
-SAP system Basis component below 6.20 or SP too low
-->check also latest TREXTcpiplient trace file entries.*
The above all are check by me everything is fine.
The below information from the saprfc.ini file
DEST=NPI
TYPE=B
MSHOST=server1
GROUP=server1_group*.
Is there any mistake, please let me know.
Regards,
Vivek.

RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system R3073

I'm creating a source system for our BW (version 7.0) dev client.I'm linking it to our R/3 4.7 QA client. From RSA1 I select create source system, I enter the system information and in the next screen I'm prompted to log on as system administrator. I'm in QA now and the system automatically crated the RFC connection. I test the connection and it runs ok. I log on to the BW client from QA and it logs on just fine. When I exit the screen I get the following message:
RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system message number R3073
Why is this happening? The connection tests just fine.
I'm using RFCREMOTE user in BW and ALEREMOTE in QA with the same password
Any ideas?
thanks

Hi,
I cannot tell you surely the settings for SCC4 now (I can't connect to my sys).
Nevertheless, create your R3QA RFCDEST manually in your BWDEV with SM59.
Create your BWDEV RFCDEST manually in your BWQA .
Perform test and authorization test within SM59 from both sys.
When creating the source system in BW the system will detect the RFC and ask you if you want to use it; accept an proceed the the rest of the procedure.
hope this helps...
Olivier.

ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level

We recently updated our development environment to Visual Studio 2010. We have previously deployed (with success) .Net stored procedures from Visual Studio 2005 to our Oracle 10gR2 database. I am currently trying to configure a local instance (called local) of Oracle 10gR2 database to test deployment of .Net stored procedures to Oracle 10gR2 via Visual studio 2010 and ODT version 11.2.0.1.2. I have built the demo from the ode developer guide and gotten as far as deploying it but executing the stored procedures from VS 2010 or SQL*Plus produces the following error...
ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CLR", line 152
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.GETDEPTNO", line 7
Here is what I have done.
(Server)
1. Installed oracle 10gR2 with ODE.Net
2. Installed Oracle 10gR2 patch set 22
3. Installed ODE upgrade from Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21
(Client)
4. Installed Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21 (In new client home).
5. Installed patch set 22 on 10g client home.
6. Installed Oracle 11g Release 2 ODAC 11.2.0.1.2 with Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio(in new 11g client home, only for VS 2010)
I have made some minor changes (GAC) etc. per the following threads...
ODE.NET 11.1.0.7.20 on 10g Database?!
Re: Error: System.TypeInitializationException
The database appears to be fully functional via TOAD - SQL plus etc. I can't find much on this error but it appears Oracle needs some permissions to launch an ASP.Net application that it does not have. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated, don't hesitate to ask for additional details.

The KB article is almost what we have apart from theitalic underlined
part
Consider the following scenario:
You use a domain administrator account to log on to a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
You use the Active Directory Users and Computers Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to connect to a domain controller.
You open the Properties dialog box of a user account.
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
You set the Remote Desktop Services Home Folderattribute to the shared folder path.
NoteThis attribute is located on the
Remote Desktop Services Profiletab.
You click Apply or OK.
In this scenario, you receive the following error message:
The home folder could not be created because: The network name cannot be found.
Note If you click Apply or OK again, no error message is returned. However, the setting is not saved.
I think the important bit is
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
We manually create the shares on our NAS and then just want to enter the path in the profile tab, I suppose the question is how to we stop it trying to create the shares ?

COREid Federation Error: A local user session could not be created for the

Hi,
I installed two instances of COREid Federation in my machine. Also installed SiteMinder and LDAP. Source Domain of COREid (8101) uses LDAP as IdMBridge and Destination Domain (9101) uses SiteMinder as IdMBridge. I am trying to access the resource protected by the SiteMinder from the source domain using the URL which is constructed using the pattern given in the PDF:
http://mymachine.domain.com:8101/shareid/saml/ObSAMLTransferService?DOMAIN=DestinationDomain&method=POST&TARGET=http://mymachine.domain.com:8887/Source/Source.html
Assertions are generated and I can see the assertion in the Source domain and transferred to the Destination Domain.
I get the following error in the Destination Domain Shareid Log file:
ERROR - [http10113-Processor3] - RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion
Please help me to solve this issue?
Note: The Web agent runs on the web server instance 8887.
SiteMinder is able to protect the resource when accessed.

Typically that error occurs when the destinations access management system can't find the user based on the SAML attribute. Check to make sure that the attribute that you are matching on matches exactly.

IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc in F110

Dear All,
The below mentioned error is encountered by us in F110.We have check all the setiing and not able to find the solution for this error.
Now our heads has gone for a toss....can anyone kindly suggest what and where we have missed out.
The system is not creating the IDOC file.....
IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc
Message no. B1090
Diagnosis
The IDoc passed to the ALE layer could not be processed. The specifications passed in the control record were not correct.
The basic IDoc type (field EDIDC-IDOCTP on the outbound side or EDI_DC-IDOCTYP on the inbound side)has not been specified for this IDoc.
The attempt to read the basic IDoc type from table EDIDO also failed. No table entry was found for IDoc type from field DOCTYP.
Procedure
Possible error sources:
- The calling program did not provide values for the fields specified above correctly. Make a note of the transaction in which this error occurred and consult your ALE administrator.
- The IDoc type is not known in your system and must be maintained.
Kindly do the needful.
Regards

If you want to create IDocs from the proposal run, outbound parameters (we20) with the 'Test' flag are required in addition.
see OSS note 504230 : Message EUPEXR forms the logical unit around the individual payment messages (PAYEXT IDocs). The E1IDRD1 segments contain the IDoc numbers of the payment messages in field DOCNUM. Segment E1IDRS1 contains check sums (total of all amounts, account numbers, bank numbers, number of payment messages). This information is provided for the EDI subsystem. Set up EUPEXR In Transaction WE20 for the partner profile for the house bank, create the outbound parameters for message type EUPEXR with IDoc type IDCREF01. If you want to create IDocs from the proposal run, outbound parameters with the 'Test' flag are required in addition.

AM 7.1 CDSSO Could not get agent for the realm

Hi,
We are trying to configure the Cookie highjacking fix in AM 7.1 and apache agent 2.2. When we try to go the agent, the browser gets redirected to the Access Manager. After authentication, I get the error message on the browser "resource access denied".
On the AM side, I get following error in amCDC file:
04/19/2007 06:19:19:919 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet Initializing...
04/19/2007 06:19:19:922 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet init params. Restricted Token Enabled: false Auth URL Cookie Name: sunIdentityServerAuthNServer Auth URL Cookie Domain:Deployment Descriptor: /amserver
04/19/2007 06:19:19:925 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: Query String received: goto=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fprintenv%3FsunwMethod%3DGET&RequestID=15432&MajorVersion=1&MinorVersion=0&ProviderID=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%3A80%2Famagent&IssueInstant=2007-04-19T18%3A19%3A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:19:934 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
SSOException caught: com.iplanet.sso.SSOException: Invalid session ID.
04/19/2007 06:19:20:430 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
Forwarding for authentication to: /UI/Login?goto=%2Famserver%2Fcdcservlet%3FTARGET%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Feauthdev.etc.net%252Fcgi-bin%252Fprintenv%253FsunwMethod%253DGET%26RequestID%3D15432%26MajorVersion%3D1%26MinorVersion%3D0%26ProviderID%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252F
eauthdev.etc.net%253A80%252Famagent%26IssueInstant%3D2007-04-19T18%253A19%253A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:27:293 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: Query String received: TARGET=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fprintenv%3FsunwMethod%3DGET&RequestID=15432&MajorVersion=1&MinorVersion=0&ProviderID=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%3A80%2Famagent&IssueInstant=2007-04-19T18%3A19%3A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
WARNING: Advice List is : null
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: targetURL = http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: gotoURL = http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET
04/19/2007 06:19:27:321 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDC Servlet: Directory matches for http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/ is:{AMIdentity object: id=eauthdev_apache_8080,ou=agent,dc=mycompany,dc=com AMSDKDN=uid=eauthdev_apache_8080,ou=agents,dc=mycompany,dc=com={sunidentityserverdevicestatus=[Active], sunidentityserverdevicekeyvalue=[agentRootURL=http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/]}}
04/19/2007 06:19:27:400 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
WARNING: Invalid GoTo URL: http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET for Agent ID: http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/
04/19/2007 06:19:27:400 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
ERROR: CDCServlet.doGetPost:Exception occured
java.lang.Exception: Invalid Agent: Could not get agent for the realm
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.LdapSPValidator.validateAndGetRestriction(LdapSPValidator.java:200)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.redirectWithAuthNResponse(CDCServlet.java:288)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.doGetPost(CDCServlet.java:247)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.doGet(CDCServlet.java:194)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:796)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:917)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.servletService(ApplicationFilterChain.java:391)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:297)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:178)
at com.sun.identity.setup.AMSetupFilter.doFilter(AMSetupFilter.java:86)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:178)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:270)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(StandardContextValve.java:241)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:182)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:571)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:160)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:571)
at com.sun.webserver.connector.nsapi.NSAPIProcessor.process(NSAPIProcessor.java:149)
at com.sun.webserver.connector.nsapi.NSAPIConnector.service(NSAPIConnector.java:995)
Does anybody knows what is going wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Vivek

One more thing Vivek : seems like the problem comes from the fact that the there's 3 checks done to ensure the goto URL matches what's in the agent profile, and one of them (the port check) fails.
agentRootURL has port 80. The gotoURL doesn't.
Try not specifying a port number for key agentRootURL and tell me if that works.
Side note : it seems you might not have the following property enabled in your AMConfig.properties :
com.sun.identity.enableUniqueSSOTokenCookie = true
HTH,
N.

IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc

I am trying to Post the payment run through the transaction F110.
In the payment run log i get the following message:
"IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc"
But in fact the IDoc is generated and it is displayed in We05.
I have configured the Message type PAYEXT-PEXR2002 and EUPEXR-IDCREF01 both for the partner.
Has anybody Idea about why this error is coming and how i can resolve this?
This is important because in Payment run log, they need to know the IDoc number generated for that run, else it may become difficult for user to identify which IDoc was created for a particular payment run.
Would appreciate if anyone can please help on the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayanan

Hi,
If you are paying the payment through F110, if the payment exceeds the limit what you are spefied in available amounts in FI12 screen. First Please check this screen.
still if you are having any problem
Check in the below path:
IMG- Financial Accounting (New) - Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable - Business Transactions - Release for Payment - 1. Create Workflow Variant for Release for Payment
2. Assign Release Approval Procedure for Release for Payment
3. Define Users with Authorization to Payment Release
Thanks
Chandra

RDS Gateway 2012, RemoteApp Displays "A Revocation check could not be performed for the Certificate" via RDWEB

I have searched through the forums and there are a number of posts that are similar but all the checks they list seem to not apply to this one.
My current setup is as follows
All Servers are 2012 R2
1 x DC server
1 x RDS Gateway server with RDS Web installed
1 x Session Host Server
Certificate supplied by godaddy with 5 names. (included is the name of the RDS Gateway/Web server in the certificate, the internal name of the session host server is not included as the internal names are differnet to the external)
My tests are as follows
Navigating to the RDSWEB page from a machine inside the same network (windows 7 sp1) but not on the same domain is fine no errors and logging in and launching any published application is fine with no errors.
However logging in on another machine that is external from the network (windows 7 sp1) is ok up to the point of launching any of the published apps I get the error about ""A Revocation check could not be performed for the Certificate". this
prompts twice but does allow you to continue and login and use the app till the next time. If I view the certificate from the warning message all appears to be ok with all certs in the chain.
I have imported the root and intermediate certs to each of the gateway/rdsweb server and session host server into the computer cert store just to be on the safe side. This has not helped, I have also run the following command from both windows 7 machines
with no errors on either
certutil -f –urlfetch -verify c:\export.cer
I cant seem to see where this is failing and I am beginning to think there is something wrong with godaddy cert itself somehow.
If I skip rdsweb and just use MSTSC with the gateway server settings then I can login to any machine on the network with no errors so this is only related to launching published apps on the 2012 R2 RDWEB or session host servers.
Any help appreciated

Hi,
1. Please make sure the client PCs have mstsc.exe (6.3.9600) installed.
2. If you are seeing a name mismatch error, you can set the published name via this cmdlet:
Change published FQDN for Server 2012 or 2012 R2 RDS Deployment
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Change-published-FQDN-for-2a029b80
To be clear, the above cmdlet changes the name that shows up next to Remote computer on the prompt you see when launching a RemoteApp. You should have a DNS A record on your internal network pointing to the private ip address of your RDCB server.
Additionally, in RD Gateway Manager, Properties of your RD RAP, Network Resource tab, you should select Allow users to connect to any network resource or if you choose to use RD Gateway Managed group you will need to add all of the appropriate names to the
group.
For example, when launching a RemoteApp you would see something like Remote computer: rdcb.domain.com and Gateway server: gateway.domain.com . Both of these names need to be on your GoDaddy certificate.
Please verify the above and reply back so that we may assist you further if needed. It is possible you have an issue with the revocation check but I would like you to make sure that the above is in place first.
Thanks.
-TP
Thanks for the response.
To be clear I am only seeing a name mismatch and revocation error if I assign a self signed cert to the session host as advised earlier in the thread by "Dharmesh Solanki", if I remove this and assign the 3rd party certificate I then
just get the revocation error , I have already ran the powershell to change the FQDN's but this has not resolved the issue although the RDP connection details now match the external url for RDWEB when looking at one of the remoteapp files. The workspace
ID still shows an internal name though inside this same file.
RD Gateway is already set to connect any resource, when connecting using remote app both names (RDCB/RDGateway) show as being correct and are contained within the same UCC certificate. I also already have a DNS entry for the Connection broker pointing to
the internal ip.
Do you know if the I need the internal name of the session host servers contained within the same UCC certificate seeing as they are different fqdn's than what I am using for external access ? I resigned the UCC certificate and included the internal name
of the session host server to see if this would help but for some reason I am still seeing the revocation error. I will check on a windows 8 client pc this evening to see if this gets any further as the majority of the testing has been done on windows 7 sp1
client pc's
Thanks

SCCM 2012 SP1 - OS Deployment - hash could not be matched for the downloded content

I've got a newly deployed SCCM 2012 SP1 running on Windows Server 2012. The W2K12 runs as vm on ESX 5.1. I'm having very odd issues with OS deployment. The TS keeps failing when processing SCCM client installation - it downloads the package but then it fails
straight away with the 80091007 - hash values couldn't be matched error - some extract from smsts.log attached below. It's very consistent, it happens every time - it downloads and applies the image fine straight after that it bombs out.
What is very interesting is that it works perfectly fine when I deploy vms (on the same or different host) - the issue seems to be be only affecting physical machines (laptops desktops). This might suggest some network issues (vSwitch with Cisco switches) but
the config on the switch is very simple and this shouldn't be the case.
I had a few virtualised SCCM 2007 installations (ESX 5 and 4) and it always worked with no problems.
I tried to recreate the package (changing source directory), turn binary differential replication on and off, copy the content of the package to the dist point or not copy. Push client installation (or other package deployments) work fine
When I tried to deploy with no download - sometimes it works but most of the time I'd get the files/folder corrupt error (can't remember the No)
This is starting to drive me crazy - There are some significant changes in the way SCCM 2012 is validating package integrity (like Content Lib folder) but the consistency of this problem is just very odd.
Anyone has any clues?
thanks
- Downloaded file from http://GTKVMGMT05.GTK.LOC...m?/x64/wic_x64_enu.exe to C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\GTK0000C\x64/wic_x64_enu.exe
- Download done setting progress bar to 100
VerifyContentHash: Hash algorithm is 32780
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\GTK0000c\i386 is a directory. Setting directory security
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\GTK0000c\x64 is a directory. Setting directory security
- Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = 5EF3A189C48F3469440A83026EC8ECD36EAD6EAF3B5D35663F8201BDE175413C, Downloaded ContentHash = FA4516EDD2D7907F8FA472A3E1B717DF2DD4A0976CD4CEAE11045EE62EC8C661
0L == TS::Utility::VerifyPackageHash(pszContentID, sDestination), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,2999)
- DownloadContentAndVerifyHash(pszPackageID, L"SMSPackage", saHttpContentSources, saSMBContentSources, saMulticastContentSources, sDestination, dwFlags, L"", 0, dwPackageFlags, pszUserName, pszUserPassword ), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3106)
- DownloadContentLocally(pszSource, sSourceDirectory, dwFlags, hUserToken, pszUserName, pszUserPassword), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3331)
ResolveSource(pszSource, sSourceDirectory, dwFlags, 0, 0, 0), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3221)
TS::Utility::ResolveSource(sClientPackageID, sClientPackagePath), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\client\osdeployment\osdgina\basesetuphook.cpp,1655)
- Failed to resolve package source "GTK0000C"
- Exiting ConfigureEx: 0x80091007
- BaseSetupHook::configure(sWindowsDir), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\client\osdeployment\osdgina\osdsetuphook.cpp,292)
- Failed to configure OSD setup hook (0x80091007)
- Failed to configure OSD setup hook (0x80091007)

is this the only indication of a problem in your smsts.log file ? did you apply the
authenticode hotfix or have you
downloaded the SP1 media after that hotfix was applied ?
Step by Step Configuration Manager Guides >
2012 Guides |
2007 Guides | I'm on Twitter > ncbrady

SHAREid - A local user session could not be created for the assertion

Problem: We have a client trying to federate to our environment using POST profile but we are getting the following error, "RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion".
I verified that the user exist in the directory and I am able to execute a test successfully as that user.
Thanks.

There is a requirement that the client needs to send an attribute called "traveler" in the assertion. We found out that the problem occurs only when client sends a attribute in the assertion. When the assertion does not include the attribute, there is no issue. Not sure why that is the case as we have other clients sending the same attribute in the assertion.
Here is the AttributeStatement.
<saml:AttributeStatement xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><saml:Subject><saml:NameIdentifier Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified">XXXXXX</saml:NameIdentifier></saml:Subject><saml:Attribute AttributeName="XXXID" AttributeNamespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims"><saml:AttributeValue>XXXXX</saml:AttributeValue></saml:Attribute></saml:AttributeStatement>
It does not have <saml:SubjectConfirmation> and <ConfirmationMethod> element. Can that be a problem?
Thanks,
Vinay
Edited by: user504421 on Jul 9, 2009 2:17 PM

Standard cost estimate could not be found for the material

Dear All,
We have 4 manufacturing plants and 30 sale depots. We are maintaining price control (S) for FG and SFG in Manufacturing plants,price control (V) at depots for the same material code. we are getting an error message " standard cost estimate could not be found for the material" while doing billing at depot.
Please give me suggestion.
Your suggestion should be appreciate.
Thanks in advance............
AND
My client want to see profitability at manufacturing plant level and need break up for the COGM. So how can i get the values of depot sales.
please let me know how to do........

Hai
Price control should be S for Depot also. You need to run standard cost estimate in DEPOT after entering additive cost under CK74N for frieght, excise duty etc. To transfer the standard cost from the source plant you need to make configuration in OMD9 defining the receiver and sender combination so that system can pick up the cost from source plant. This special produrement type needs to be asigned in the material masters of DEPOT under MRP 2 view.
Pushkala

Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = , Downloaded ContentHash

<![LOG[Download done setting progress bar to 100]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="1" thread="2544"
file="downloadcontent.cpp:1603">
<![LOG[VerifyContentHash: Hash algorithm is 32780]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="1" thread="2544"
file="downloadcontent.cpp:1726">
<![LOG[Failed to open file c:\_smstasksequence\packages\cms00007\configmgr2012adminui-rtm-kb2717295-i386.msp with error [32].
]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3" thread="2544" file="securityutil.cpp:478">
<![LOG[HashFile - exclusive access check for the file failed.]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context=""
type="3" thread="2544" file="hashdir.cpp:227">
<![LOG[Failed to hash file, Win32 error = 4103]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3"
thread="2544" file="hashdir.cpp:631">
<![LOG[Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = 0617F93A16E48E5E4AE958081967812D78AF06F608A1C39CD9DE85D97003AD01, Downloaded ContentHash = ]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120"
date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3" thread="2544" file="downloadcontent.cpp:1771">
<![LOG[0L == TS::Utility::VerifyPackageHash(pszContentID, sDestination), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,2900)]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013"
component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="0" thread="2544" file="resolvesource.cpp:2900">
<![LOG[DownloadContentAndVerifyHash(pszPackageID, L"SMSPackage", saHttpContentSources, saSMBContentSources, saMulticastContentSources, sDestination, dwFlags, L"", 0, dwPackageFlags, pszUserName, pszUserPassword
), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3007)]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="0" thread="2544"
file="resolvesource.cpp:3007">
i saw this links :
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/909ea31c-7bda-49e2-8b06-ed4fc9c3c48c/
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/4801408b-de60-488c-9d80-7a87134abbaf/
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/4942384c-161c-454f-b8da-bc2a24844602
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/a57bb130-f231-4ced-8ec9-2f645ef9e5f1
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/7146fa83-d00e-4fc1-924b-a829860e506a
i did not try to do this Antivirus Scan and Exclusion Recommendations (i relay don't see why i need this if all oder task finshing succesfuly
http://blogs.technet.com/b/configurationmgr/archive/2010/11/30/configmgr-2007-antivirus-scan-and-exclusion-recommendations.aspx
i redownload the file from the -kb2717295 and recreate the package , i run this image deployment on all kind of PC they all failed, here is the
file : configmgr2012adminui-rtm-kb2717295-i386.msp
i don't know why this file failed, i run this manual it work and this task is also a deployment on collection and it have 100% successes on 8 pc
i wander what make it failed .

This is what worked for me. I had to create a brand new package and push it out to the DP's. Then updated my Task Sequence with the new package. It worked perfectly for me. I hope this helps.

An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for