Any recommendations for a new Graphics card for Prem Pro 2014 (Windows) that offers Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration?

Hi.
I am led to believe I could benefit from GPU acceleration when editing as my PC is a little under spec. I do have a card but when I switch to GPU acceleration it does work but every time I stop moving / playing / scrubbing on the timeline the preview screen goes black.
I am not sure which might be the best card to obtain for my reqs. I dont think I put the biggest of demands on the software but it does still struggle. Most of my editing is 3 - 10 min long interviews. 2 camera multi-cam editing. I invariably have need to edit RGB curves, three way colour corrector, transitions and sometimes Neat noise reduction. Any of those leaves my PC struggling. All the usual titles, music & voice-overs etc but nothing too heavy going like making films or inserting lots of video lines.
I also do an occasional bit of work in After effects too.
PC spec is:
Intel Xeon CPU 1.86GHz (2 processors)
12GB RAM which I am going to upgrade to 16GB
64 bit op system
Windows 7
Radeon HD 5450 graphics card.
Any guidance would be much appreciated

Thanks for insight. I am not technical but I suspect your right about the base technology of my PC. The processors and RAM (even if I upgrade) are probably too limited. I was not so sure about the relationship between the main processor and the graphic card. I rather hoped that the card would get round the limitations of the CPU's.
I maybe need to invest some time looking in to improving the spec of my PC. Any thoughts on a suitable spec from anyone would be helpful bearing in mind my relatively narrow editing needs.
Even so I will look at the GTX 660 and see what it might offer. The only reason I thought the 5450 might offer GPU acceleration was because the option was available to select in the preferences in PremPro. Figured it wouldn't be an option otherwise. Certainly doesnt seem to work correctly or offer any advantage so gone back to software only.
This is not going to be a quick or inexpensive resolution by the looks of it :-)
Thanks again for input.

Similar Messages

  • Any recommendations for a new Graphics card for Mac Pro?

    Any recommendations for a new Graphics card for mac pro edit in Premiere 2014 and I need to have   output to a monitor my current graphics card is ATI Radeon HD Graphics 5870 1024 MB I find better for what I need?

    Look at this EVGA card for the Mac

  • When will newer EVGA video cards be approved for Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration?

    I built my system for video editing, Windows 7 Ultimate, i7 920Mhz, 24Gb RAM, ASUS Rampage III Extreme motherboard and EVGA GeForce GTX 570 video card. I decided to upgrade my video card to EVGA 660Ti with many more CUDA processors and 3GB memory, but when I rendered some video I got this message "The project was last used with Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration, which is not available on this system. Mercury Playback Engine Software only will be used." and it seemed the rendering was slower. Even though the EVGA newer Video cards have more memory and processor power and more CUDA cores and score better on Windows Experience Intex, Adobe does not approve them and say they use Merecury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration. Why? The Quadro cards are much more expensive have less memory, fewer CUDA cores but are rated higher by Adobe for Premiere and rendering, why is that? What gives? Why are the EVGA cards that seem more powerful and less expensive rated lower than the Quadro cards? Will this ever change?

    LOL!
    Hunt

  • Nvidia Geforce 670 and the Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration for Adobe Premiere Pro

    Will Adobe test and certify the Nvidia Geforce GTX 670 for use with the mercury playback engine GPU acceleration feature of Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 in the near future? Any advice would be much appreciated, thanks in advance for any help.

    Adobe only certifies after extensive testing... For many others, with at least 1Gig of video ram, use the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a "supported cards" file - and Mac http://www.vidmuze.com/how-to-enable-gpu-cuda-in-adobe-cs6-for-mac/

  • Looking for a new graphics card for new display

    I recently purchased a 24" LCD monitor to increase my screen real estate. I was anticipating using the DVI connection on the monitor, but found out that the connection I have on the PM G4 Dual 1GHz is an ADC connector instead. Presently I'm using it in analog mode which works fine, but in anticipation of Leopard, I was planning on upgrading my video card (GeForce 4 MX, 64MB VRAM) with one that will support CoreImage, as this one doesn't. In addition, this monitor can pivot to 90 degrees in a portrait orientation, and I would like a card that supports this feature as well.
    I tried my PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz with its ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 card, and find it supports CoreImage as well as screen rotation--just what I was hoping for. It works like a charm with the new display. I just need to find out what 4x AGP desktop cards support these features. Any suggestions? I appreciate your input.
    Power Mac G4 Dual 1-GHz (QuickSilver)   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    Hi-
    Welcome to Discussions!
    The ATI Radeon 9800 Pro Mac will take care of your needs.
    http://ati.de/products/radeon9800/radeon9800prome/specs.html

  • New Graphics card for P965 Platinum

    My good old P965 Platinum has lost its graphics card lately and I need to look for a replacement.
    The old graphics card was an ATI X1950 XTX 512MB and has stood up well considering the vast advances in everything since then.
    The problem is compatability since all new cards these days are PCI Express 3.
    Does anyone have any recommendations on what newer graphics cards would work on this motherboard (if any)?

    Quote from: cormicknugent on 02-August-13, 16:39:27
    My good old P965 Platinum has lost its graphics card lately and I need to look for a replacement.
    The old graphics card was an ATI X1950 XTX 512MB and has stood up well considering the vast advances in everything since then.
    The problem is compatability since all new cards these days are PCI Express 3.
    Does anyone have any recommendations on what newer graphics cards would work on this motherboard (if any)?
    We had excellent results with GTS450 and GTX460 on MSI P965 Platinum.
    But they are PCI-E 2.0 graphic cards.
    You may also try GTX 650 and GTX 660, but it may fail in case of BIOS/VBIOS incompatibilities.
    In any case, you need a good (single rail) PSU (at least 450W for real).
    The additional PCI-E power connector is a must, because the PCI-E 1.0 slot cannot provide the power for a PCI-E 2.1 and 3.0 graphics card.

  • IMAC's Top graphics card frustration - Cheap and no support for Adobe Mercury Playpack Engine GPU Acceleration?

    If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
    Please, if you have a solution for me, let me know. Otherwise I find it pretty frustrating that I purchased a top-end iMAC, fully maxed-out in every way possible, and that the iMac doesn't support Adobe Premiere's Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration. Also, an old USB 2.0 Hub and thus the built-in SD card reader is slow. If you have SD cards with 95MB/s Transfer, Read and Write speeds, the iMAC will only transfer at around 30MB/s if you're lucky. Technically 480Mbs which is around 50MB/s but I haven't seen those speeds.
    I figured this could at least be circumvented with a Thunderbolt SD card reader or a Thunderbolt to USB 3.0 adapter but of course no such thing exists.
    Well, nothing with a reasonable price tag. This all might seem trivial to some but when you're uploading 24 hours of HD video footage from a 128GB SDXC card, the speed makes a big difference.
    And come on, no BluRay support? Ridiculous. I get the politics of why but still, just ridiculous. It would be nice to be able to burn a BluRay to watch in my home theater system. There are other methods but BluRay is convenient and great for backing up large Video Files. Unfortunately BluRay looks like it's not going to make it.  Maybe cable distribution companies will increase their Internet upload speeds one day and I can just store everything in the cloud and watch full length movies(that I've created) on Vimeo.
    Anyways, I went and took a look at the hardware Apple stuffed inside my fancy (3.4 Ghz i7, 16GB 1333 DDR3, 2GB AMD 6970M, 256 GB SSD Internal and 2TB 7200 Internal) machine and it appears to be pretty middle of the range stuff. It's an iMAC, not a Mac Pro so why am I griping? Because my 2009 PC(which I tricked out over the last two years) is faster and does support the Mercury Playback Engine. I spent $2100 total on this PC which includes all my upgrades. I spent around $3300 on the iMAC. I feel ripped off.
    Yes, I do love my iMAC on multiple levels but had I known my dated 2009 PC would render video projects faster, I would have gone with a MAC Pro or just a new PC. It seems that Mac is moving completely away from making high-end computers for niche markets(video editing) and focusing on their tiny laptops, IPADS and IPhones for the masses. Obviously smart from a capitalistic perspective(at present at least) but very frustrating for some.
    I was actually told to purchase a MAC for video editing. I've been a PC guy for 15 years. I went with the iMAC because I had read many good things about it(probably just Apple propaganda)  and also the MAC PRO was to be discontinued. Also the MAC Pro would have been triple the cost for what didn't seem like a whole lot more.
    It's one's thing to prepackage a computer with inferior hardware(the iMAC I have is fast for most things and more than enough for 99% of the population) but to not allow us to pop open the computer and make a quit upgrade to the machine is what really makes me feel like I'm using a computer built for Grannies. I mean there is a reason my mother loves iMacs and Iphones. Amazing that I was able to upgrade my memory from 4 to 16GB  but I've heard Apple has even done away with that. I get why they do it. Apple Warranty, Apple Care issues, Profit and World Domination: Apple wants a monopoly on everything.
    Was great to see Adobe bounce back after the whole Flash/HTML5 thing and knock Final Cut Pro off the face of the Earth for good. People are still buying it b/c of the brand name but Final Cut is done. David Fincher used Adobe's Workflow for everything when he made The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo. Hollywood is making the shift and the world will follow. The Adobe Workflow has finally come together and there is just no way Apple can compete with Adobe Creative Cloud and an Engine that can just swap from Premiere to After Effects to Prelude to SpeedGrade to Photoshop to Story with speed for $29 bucks a month(or $49 for some). Apple better start supporting Adobe's Mercury Engine or they may have a problem. And if you're using Final Cut X, you're severely handicapping yourself. Problem is that people don't want to take the time to learn Adobe's products(steep learning curve for sure) which is where Apple's Granny software, and perhaps computers, comes in to play. Arnold Schwarzenegger once said "Milk is for babies, Real Men Drink Beer".  I'm beginning to think that "Mac's are for Grannies, Real Men Use Adobe and PCs".
    The major problem with Apple is you're forced to use Apple. Not sure but history has proven that people don't like to be forced into anything. Autocracies don't work. These systems eventually topple, even in the corporate world.
    Amazon.com, now that's the company to emulate. What an amazing machine!
    I've read that Apple may even discontinue the iMAC after 2013. Who knows?
    If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
    1) Graphcis Card  - AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB (6990 would have been better or something from NVIDIA.
    2) USB 2.0 Hub with only 480 Mb/sec
    3) Seagate Baracude SATA I 7200 RPM drive with 3GB/s transfer rate and only a 32 GB Cach. It's ok. I would have expected at least a Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB SATA III 7200 RPM 64 MB  or the Velociraptor at 10,000RPM.
    4)APPLE SSD TS256C  Flash Drive. As you can see, it doesn't stack up so well against other SSD Drive.
    Just average. http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/hdd_lookup.phphdd=APPLE+SSD+TS256C

    Whining and ranting about how iMacs can't do this or iMacs/orMacs can't do that is not going to get you a lot of help here.
    Your "I love my MAC" is typical of the ever ubiquitous PC whiner.
    If your video work needs were that computer intensive and critical , you should've done some online research and you should have budgeted for a Mac Pro.
    Mac Pros are completely expandable and upgradeable unlike the iMac.
    Mac Pros have much more faster and more CPU cores than the iMac line.
    iMac line is limited to CPUs with 8 cores. The Mac Pros, I believe, are up to 16 core CPUs, now.
    The Mac Pros can have their GPU upgraded and you even add/expand to use specialty audio/video cards.
    Mac Pros are the defacto standard for real video work.
    iMacs, even the high end model, is not really designed to do really heavy and intensive video work.
    iMacs do do video creation and editing. Just not on the level that is needed from a more "Pro" computer.
    It seems to me you are asking your iMac to do more than it was originally designed for, in terms of professional video editing.
    You get a lot more out of a Mac Pro than an iMac for any real serious video, CGI or animation work.
    You just didn't want to spend that much cash on one.
    iMacs are not user upgradeable or friendly to user upgrades at all!!!
    If you purchased a Mac Pro, you could've had that better, faster HD, better faster SSDs.
    That said, I can offer no real help to but because of the nature of your post and the fact you just simply annoyed me, I feel some advice and explanations are in order
    First off, you picked Adobe video editing software suite as your video creation software on the Mac.  It's no secret to long-time video content creators on the Mac that Adobe products, especially those for video creation and editing are very user unfriendly on the Mac. Even though Macs are supported from Adobe, Adobe for a long time has treated the Mac and Mac users as second class citizens.
    Before purchasing and installing Adobe Premiere, did you even check Adobe's site for the preferred system hardware and software requirements? Hmmm?
    This is why you should KNOW what software you are going to be running on a computer first then research what computer make and model will run said software.
    That's why Apple has its own apps like Aoerture, Logic and Final Cut.
    Despite your ignorance in this matter, Final Cut Pro X is alive and doing well, thank you, and using this software on your iMac would kick Adobe Premier in the you know whats.
    Final Cut Pro X is a complete video solution for and completely designed around the Mac.
    Why are you using USB 2.0 connections for video work when you have a perfectly good FireWire 800 connection.
    In case you are not aware, FireWire 800 is called so because it has a max throughput of 800 Mbps.
    Your 2011 iMac can take up to 32 GBs of RAM. Not just 16 GBs.
    This changed when the 2010 model iMacs came out.
    Blu-ray? I believe you can buy external Blu-ray writers that work with Mac using said FW800 connection.
    So you cite one movie and one videographer using Adobe Premier for your premise that Final Cut is dead in Hollywood?
    Your argument that Apple locks you into everything in their world can be countered by saying Windows and Windows PCs lock you into the Windows world. What's your point?
    Apple is not discontinuing their computers platforms any time soon.
    All you are regurgitating is rumor. Probably from all of the PC crowd.
    iMacs and professional desktop Macs are not going anywhere.
    Currently, Apple is the only desktop/laptop computer maker that is still making a profit on their Macs and increasing their market share percentages for the last 5 years during which the PC market has continually slumped/dropped in its market share.

  • Which New Graphic Card For 2008 Mac Pro?

    I'm going to buy Final Cut X, so I'll need a new graphic card for my 2008 MacPro. My current card is an ATI Radeon HD 2600.
    I asked AppleCare and they sent me a link to a lot of compatible cards (copied below).
    But it turns out that most of these cards need Windows - at least according to specs - and the rest don't have the (2) DVI-D connections I need - so which card should I buy?
    The card has to work with my 2 Acer P243W 24" screens at 1920 x 1200 @ 60 Hz.
    Here's Apple's list:
    •    NVIDIA
    o    GeForce 320M
    o    GeForce GT 330M
    o    GeForce 9400M
    o    GeForce 9600M GT
    o    GeForce 8600M GT  Note: OpenCL compatible, but does not meet system requirements for Final Cut Pro X, Motion 5 and Compressor.
    o    GeForce GT 120
    o    GeForce GT 130
    o    GeForce GTX 285
    o    GeForce 8800 GT
    o    GeForce 8800 GS
    o    Quadro FX 4800
    o    Quadro FX5600
    •    ATI
    o    Radeon HD 4670
    o    Radeon HD 4850
    o    Radeon HD 4870
    o    Radeon HD 5670
    o    Radeon HD 5750
    o    Radeon HD 5770

    Once you look at what is sold, limits the list. None of those listed require Windows though. What specs? I don't see any specs. And of course nothing listed are Windows, that would be strange. Why you pasted notebook and iMac graphic adapters... unless Apple is selling FCPX for Windows.
    Forget the GT120 though some use it with FCPX and are okay with it, save a little though I think 5770 has more processing, bandwidth and of course 1GB DDR5.
    support for 6870 PC card is looking like a possible option now, too.
    It is more mainly just 5770 vs 5870. Or Quadro 4000.
    Amazon has PNY Mac Pro edition $790 vs Apple's $1195 for same card
    PNY Quadro 4000 2 GB DDR5 Mac Pro
    When FCX came out we had a couple threads on same topic.
    Apple Graphics Cards
    OSX and Graphics Cards
    Radeon 6870 3DMark 30% gain on 5870
    Flashed PC Radeon HD5870 Mac Pro 2008
    Flashed PC Radeon HD5870 Mac Pro 2008 - dual DVI works
    I include the above for same reason why when the 4870 came out, PC card was 1/2 price and $450 for 5870? really? when XFX and Saffire are under $199.
    Radeon 5870 vs 5770 GTX 285 4870
    Three Video Displays one card
    Display Adapters Needed

  • Recommend compatible PSU and graphics card for P35D3?

    Recommend compatible PSU and graphics card for P35D3?
    This weekend I’ll be taking my rig to a PC repair shop and ask them to swap out my PSU and my graphics card.
    Because I’ve RMA’d all the components (see signature) several members of different forums, and the tech support of the various components, seem to think that my boot problem is because of a compatibility issue with either my Ultra X3 600W PSU or my XFX 8600 GT and my P35D3.
    I need to be ready to make decision, without having time to research, if the repair tech recommends a replacement.
    Here’s my considerations:
    I selected the Ultra because it's both modular and 85% efficient (it also has the required 8-pin cable to power the P35D3's CPU and it has SATA power cables.
    I selected the XFX 8600 GT card because it is dual-link (2 DVI outs -- Dell 30” & Viewsonic 19”) and it has no fan, and is DX10 ready. I’m not attached to the idea of no fan. I’m a speed freak but not a gamer or an over clocker--I like the option of trying out games.
    Both the Ultra and the XFX are somewhat medium priced.
    If the repair tech discovers that other PSUs or graphic cards work then I might be able to get Ultra or XFX to accept a return. Neither company accepted my offer to pay extra to exchange mine for another better model.
    Suggestions please.
    Thank you,
    Kerry

    Thanks Boss,
    Quote
    Look here for good PSU suggestions:
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=112039.msg836246#msg836246
    About VGA any should work, you can see MSI Test Report for your board here:
    http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=prodtestreport&prod_no=1230&maincat_no=1&cat2_no=&cat3_no=#menu
    lots of good info.
    Wish me luck today (Thu), that the tech finds out my XFX or Ultra is not compatible.
    Kerry

  • Need recommendations: New graphics card for HPE-400y

    Hi!  I'm in need of a new graphics card, but I don't know which one is best for my computer.  My computer is a Hewlett Packard  HPE-400y.   Click here for specs!
    My computers has all the original parts except the PSU and HDD. I recently changed the PSU to a Corsair CX430.  The current hard drive is a WD Caviar Black 2TB. 
    I use my computer for Guild Wars 2, Maya (models and animation), Zbrush, Corel Painter, and Photoshop.
    My current graphics card (Radeon HD 5450) has issues playing Guild Wars 2. The FPS is 30 or lower if I try to play the game with medium or high settings. The FPS also drops when I'm playing the group PVP event known as World Vs World. I often have to have the graphics on the lowest setting in order to get 30 -45 FPS.
    You can find the Guild Wars 2 requirements here: GW2 official wiki -- requirements info
     Click here for Maya 2015 requirements
    Click here for Photoshop requirements
    Click here for Zbrush requirements
    Click here for Corel Painter requirements (When you get to the page, click on system requirements)
    Any and all help is appreciated!  Thank you in advance for your advice and help!
    --srandall

    Hi,
    You should be able to get a double wide card in your PC.  Length may be a problem due to all of the cables. If the space below the optical drive is open then you might try to stuffing the extra cable lengths into that location.
    BTW-- very nice photos.  Not many will go through the effort to do so.
    Consider trying one of the below graphics.  
    MSI NVIDIA GTX N750 TI and the MSI GTX N750 TF  Both of these graphics cards are significantly faster then your existing 5450.
    Know what the return policy is before your buy.
    You have an excellent Corsair power supply. I would prefer that you had a 500 watt PSU so that the higher performing graphics cards could be tried.  This NVIDIA GTX 660 specifies at 450 watt minimum but the 12v amperage from your Corsair CX430 is more than sufficient.  It might be worth giving it a go.  It's about 50% faster than the above two graphics cards.  I typically don't recommend that graphics cards be used with PSUs below the graphics card manufacturer's minimum requirements but the Corsair CX430 should work.
    HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
    HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
    HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
    Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
    Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
    Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

  • Need New Graphics Cards For Editing PC

    With the workload I deal with on a regular basis I often find it's my graphics that freeze up or it's just too slow rendering out Premiere Pro, After Effects and 3D work. So I'm looking to purchase either 2x(Mid Range Graphics Cards) or 1x(High End Graphic Card) for my editing PC. I'm really not that tech savi so I'd love some advice/recommendations to what I could/should get. By budget isn't that small but I wouldn't want to spend too much more for little difference (Maximum total £400/$650.12)
    My Current PC Specs
    Processor:
    - Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 3501 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s)
    Motherboard:
    - ASUSTek Computer INC. SABERTOOTH P67
    Memory:
    - 16GB
    Internal Drives:
    - SanDisk SDSSDX-120G-G25 120GB Extreme SATA III 6Gb/s 2.5in Internal Solid State Drive
    - 2x 2TB WD HDD (Were external but now internal
    Video Cards:
    - 2x AMD Radeon HD 7450
    OS:
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
    Programs I Use:
    - Adobe Master Collector CS6 + Video Copilot's Element 3D plugin
    - 3DS Max 2010
    - Boujou 5.0
    - FL Studio 10
    - Cubebase 5
    - Some Steam Games
    If you require any other info or in more detail just ask

    >often find it's my graphics that freeze up
    For video editing, you need to scale your pictures before importing into Premiere Pro
    Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
    -Too Large May = Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967
    -And another crash report http://forums.adobe.com/thread/973935

  • New graphic card for a G5 ?

    Hey..
    I want to replace a ATI Radeon X1900 PCIe with a better and faster card.
    Its hard to find graphic cards for Mac in the first place but i found this ?
    http://stores.ebay.com/LOCAL338-ONLINE-STORE
    Would these be safe to use ? what do you guys think.
    Thx for all your help everybody

    Hi-
    Local338 is very professional in his/their service. I have two 6800 GT cards that he did, and absolutely no complaints.
    A very reliable seller. Check his feedback.
    The 7800GTX that he sells should be a good step up from the X1900.

  • Looking for a new graphics card.

    Before I post my specs; I cannot get a new power supply for a while, I ONLY want to explore gfx card options, I already know my choices will be limited so I would like those few choices to be listed because I'm not entirely sure if I can find the right one to buy, help would be greatly appreciated.
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docnam​e=c01616203&tmp_track_link=ot_faqs/top_issues/en_u​...
    Everything you need to know, I will continue to look around, any suggestions would be great.

    As I pointed out on another thread, shopping for something that you don't plan on buying for a while isn't worth while because prices, and models change constantly in the computer parts field.
    A good PSU brand : ThermalTake, Corsair, Antec, to name the first three on my mind
    Graphics: PNY, ASUS, Zotac, EVGA
    For your case, i'd shoot for a 400-550watt psu, and then hopefully by the time you have enough saved up, shoot for a GTX 430. Solid card, good performance, lower price.
    If you like my post, or solution to your issue/question, go ahead and click on the little star by my name and/or accept the post as the Solution. It makes me happy.
    I'm NOT an employee of Best Buy, or Geek Squad, though I did work as an Agent for a year 5 years ago. None of my posts are to be taken as the official stance that Best Buy will take on your situation. My advice is just that, advice.
    Unfortunately, that's the bad luck of any electronic, there's going to be bad Apples... wait that's a horrible pun.

  • Need advice for a new graphics card

    Hey this is my first time posting here. I've got a Power Mac G4 MDD 1.25GHz with the original ATI Radeon 9000 Pro. I just recently tried installing Final Cut Suite 2 and found out my card isn't good enough. I've tried doing some research into what I need to buy, but have been rather confused. Any recommendations? I need to run the newest Final Cut. Thanks!

    Welcome to Apple Discussions!
    Retail card options are limited to two ATI Radeon cards. The current 9800 has the most capable graphics processor unit (GPU) but only 128MB VRAM. The 9600 is a little cheaper and has 256MB VRAM to make up for a slower GPU. Still, both cards are more capable than the 9000.
    I find the Mac specs on the ATI site confusing and sometimes outdated since being absorbed by AMD. Frankly, one of their resellers, Other World Computing, does a better job of showing current ATI specs than ATI. The two cards are listed on this page:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/search/videocardsAGP

  • New Graphics Card for DKA790-GX Platinum

    Hi guys, looking for some advice on a discreet graphics card solution for my DKA790-GX Platinum PC build. I've just purchased a new 27" LED monitor (not arrived yet) that natively runs 1920 x1080 and my friend told me that the inbuilt Radeon HD 3300 graphics in the 790GX chipset will struggle with that resolution ?
    Now first, I should explain I don't play games on the PC at all, but am a photographer, so regularly use Photoshop CS 5, Lightroom 4, Nikon Capture NX2 etc, and also play a few DVD and Blue ray movies though the PC. Because of this I'm not after a full blown graphics card, as to be honest, I want to spend the minimum possible, but obviously want a meaningful performance increase over the in built graphics.
    Something else to throw in the mix is that I'm currently running without the side port memory enabled in Bios, as  whenever I do enable it, I get corrupted graphics within a few seconds and eventually a BSOD. Without the side port enabled, it runs fine on my current 22" Monitor running 1680 * 1050.
    My set up currently consists of the above motherboard, an AMD Phenom Black X4 940 3.0ghz black edition processor (not overclocked), 8gb Crucial Ballastix DDR2 PC2-6400 Ram, DVD re-write and Blue ray player / DVD burner. OCZ 256mb SSD boot drive and WD Cavier 2TB 7200 rpm HDD. 700w Power supply.
    Do you think my friend is right or will the Radeon HD3300 be fine for my purposes ?
    Any advice gratefully appreciated.

    Quote from: Sootchucker on 29-October-12, 23:39:16
    As I said I'll check tonight Svet.
    To the original question, for a non gaming environment, do you think the HD 3300 (with or without Side port) would be man enough to run 1920 * 1080 ?
    Quote from: Sootchucker on 29-October-12, 23:39:16
    As I said I'll check tonight Svet.
    Oki, yes i just point you where to look.
    Quote from: Sootchucker on 29-October-12, 23:39:16
    To the original question, for a non gaming environment, do you think the HD 3300 (with or without Side port) would be man enough to run 1920 * 1080 ?
    Yes, it should do fine.
     http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/chipsets/7-series-integrated/Pages/amd-790gx-chipset.aspx

Maybe you are looking for