AP Minimal Payment Amount

We are trying to pay a past due invoice in AP, however the system says the invoice amount does not meet the minimum payment amount. Does anyone know where this is set?

Have you checked payable option for Minimum Payment.??

Similar Messages

Payment Amount is greater than invoice amount in sales order

Hi experts:
I have a Sales order that contained originally 3 lines of which the first 2 lines was delivered totally and the third was delivered partially.
The client decided to change the remaining quantity for another reference so the procedure in the sales order was to add another line and try to close the third line by right click and "close row" but the option is not available because there is a partial delivery, so the option was to update the inicial quantity in the third line at the same as delivered and update.
Like a result a I could close the third line and leave a fourth line available to delivery, however when I open this Sales order again an try to update a message "payment amount is greater than invoice amount" and appears inmediately the "Deposit on Order" window.
Other Information: The quantities delivered was invoiced but no payment has been received.
Checking in the SCN I have not found some related information with this case because the existing answers are related with incomming and outgoing payments but like I mentioned before this docuements already have not payments.
In relation with the decimal places, my original decimal places configuration was 2 and it was updated to 3, issue that neither is mentioned in previous answers.
I will appreciate your help,
Thanks,
Manuel

Hi Manuel,
Your case is complicated by the fact you have not only undated the Sales Order which is partially delivered but also updated decimal places during the process. In this case, you are probably the best person to figure out what is the system expected number. You may restore your production db to test environment first. Then do whatever you could to fix the problem. If no solution can be found, you have to log a message to SAP support.
A general advice: do not fight with system for what you think system should accept.
Thanks,
Gordon

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing incoming payment
regards
kavitha S

Hi Kavitha,
please check in the OINV table the balance due on the invoice. This amount has to match the payment. If the problem is due to different decimal places & you are using a version lower than 2007 you will be able to change the decimal places for this particular payment. If you are using 2007, you will no longer be able to reduce the number of decimal places. In that case you could check out SAP note 1321183 & verify with your accountant that the workaround may be used.
All the best,
Kerstin

Payment amount greater than net amount!

Payment amount greater than net amount! , i am receiving this error while doing partial payment.. plz help
Also reversed documents are not coming in partial payment tab in F-53 but it is showing as a open item in vendor balance.....

/hi,
First of all Check ur Clearig GL i.e Bank /Cash in that Relevant to cash Flow is ticked or not.If not ticked then tick it and then try again.
thanks
deepa

How to Get Down Payment Amount associated to one customer invoice

Hello Experts,
I have an issue and i need your help.
I have one customer invoice in FI (Transaction FB70).
In my form, i need to print the Down Payment Amount associated to this customer invoice. How can i get this information? I mean this amount. There is a table or MF that can give me this amount?
Thank you in advance.

Get from BSEG table

Offcycle payment amount is getting adjusted with the regular payroll

Hi Sappers,
offcycle payment amount is getting adjusted with the regular payroll if the salary is negative.
We want to stop this...please help

Simply in the regular payroll you have to modify the rule X011 to cater the specific requirement.
You have to bring 0267 in between If statement
If SPRN
P0267
Else
P0014
p0015
ETC
End if.
I have faced same problem if you need will send you screen shot. Please let me know if required.
Afrasyab

Open Down Payment Amount

Hi Everyone,
I had a sales order which had a 50% down payment invoice created. The down payment invoice was paid by the customer. There were three different deliveries against the order as they were partial shipments. This led to three different invoices. Our customer did not apply the down payment to the first invoice by accident. They then applied the down payment against the second and third invoices. However, this has left a balance open on the down payment. The last two invoices did not total the down payment amount.
The first invoice that was created without the down payment applied against it is still open. However, I can't seem to apply the down payment to the invoice. Our customer, in an attempt, to correct the general ledger, did a journal entry to correct the g/l portion. However, when I look at the Down Payments to Draw window (I get to it by going to an invoice that had a down payment applied against it and pressing the ... button next to Total Down Payment) it still shows an open amount. How do I apply this open amount so it no longer appears? Is there anyway to apply this against the first invoice? If not, how do I clear this out of there?
I appreciate anybody's help.
Thank you,
Amanda Ramstack

Hi Kerstin and Suda,
Thank you for your responses as well. I appreciate the help.
I wasn't able to do an internal reconcilliation because the down payment amounts are not listed. So, I tried the process Kerstin suggested in a test environment. I have a few questions:
- What should I do if this an applied amount against the existing A/R Invoice?
- How does this affect sales history? Will it appear as if the customer has bought these items twice instead of once?
My biggest concern is in regards to the applied payment. How should I handle this?
Thank you again for your help.
Amanda

AP:selected payment schedules report "Credit reduces payment amount below

Hi all:
I have a PPR reject one Debit memo with reason "Credit reduces payment amount below zero" at first and shows out in report "selected payment schedules report" as Unselected Scheduled Payments.
PPR Pay through date: 28-Nov-2011
Issued Debit Memo date: 28-Oct-2011.
But when change the Pay through date of PPR to 28-Nov-2012.
Then this issued Debit Memo can be selected and processed.
Any idea about this issue?
Your reply will be very appreciated.
Thank you
Beryl
Edited by: user10937857 on Dec 13, 2011 1:40 AM
Edited by: user10937857 on Dec 13, 2011 7:01 PM

Hi:
Thank you for your kindly reply.
I have already checked these 3 notes. for the setup one, customer has checked ,the setup is correct.
For the other patch solution notes.
If this issue is a bug issue, then why when they extend the PPR Pay through date to next year, then this Credit memo can be selected and processed?
Confusing.
Any idea about this?
Thank you very much

Payment amount is more than Purchase Order Amount

Dear FI Expert,
We are getting the error "Payment amount is more than Purchase Order
Amount" w hen a single payment through one check is being made against 2
purchase orders.
System is considering only the 1st purchase order and disallowing
payment.
For e.g. 2 Purchase Orders are created w ith 100% DP condition: First
one
for USD 200000 and second one for USD 100000.
2 Dow n Payment requests are created through ME2DP against these 2
Purchase Orders.
At the time of making payment through F-48 by selecting both open items
it takes the reference of only one Purchase Order and generates the
error
"Payment amount is more than Purchase Order Amount."
Please suggest how entry w ill be made in such cases.
Thanks
Kamlesh Jangir

Hi kamlesh,
You are using EHP 4 or higher package. in this case you can use FPDP_CREATE instead of ME2DP.
You can go through Business function LOG_MMFI_P2P
https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000002672&_EVENT=DISPLAY&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000122&_HIER_…
Down Payment and Down Payment Request - Purchasing (MM-PUR) - SAP Library
I hope this will be help full
Regards
Raheem

AP Invoice - Credit memo - negative payment amount

Hello all,
I am working in 11i oracle apps.
In AP_invoices_all table there is an invoice_id that has a negative amount on it
I understood that it is a credit memo. Can you please explain what a credit memo is and how does it affect a business
Also, when I checked the corresponding invoice_id in the AP_invoice_payments_all table, this invoice has a negative payment amount. What does this mean? How is it going to effect in the journal entries.
Thank you
Bob

Hi.
A Credit Memo can be considered the opposite of a Standard Invoice. It can be due to severeal reasons like, for example, when you claim to your supllier that the price for a certain good or service was higher than the agreed he can send you a Credit Memo in the amount of the price difference. You have recorded the Invoice (let's say $100) for the wrong price and now you will record the CM (let's say $10) for a negative amount being that the sum of the two documents correspond to the correct purchase you have done.
This way, the table AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS_ALL records the CM with a negative amount allowing you to pay the two documents (the positive invoice and the negative CM) for the net amount.
About the journals entries:
Invoice
DR Cost $100
CR Liabilty $100
CM
DR Liability $10
CR Cost $10
Payment
DR Liability $90
CR Bank $90
Hope this helps,
Octavio

F110 - Exclude / Include vendors based on payment Amount in payment run

I have a requirement to make a vendor to appear in the exception list if the payment amount for the vendor (invoices are grouped together for payment) exceeds a certain limit. Can anyone explain me how can achieve this?
Eg:
Vendor A has 2 invoices of $1000 each which is due for payment
Vendor B has 5 invoices of $1000 each which is due for payment
Both vendor need to be paid using payment method A
The requirement is all vendors payments which exceeds $3000 must appear in the exception list.
That is for the above case if I execute the F110 proposal ran then Vendor A should be selected for payment and Vendor B should appear in the exception list.
Can this be achieved? Any suggestions?
I have managed to do the selection other way around (Making Vendor B selecting for payment and Vendor A appearing in the exception) by providing the minimum amount in payment method A configuration for specific company code. But that is not my requirement.

Hello,
why don't you try the Maximum amount instead?
Doesn't this cover your requirement?
Be careful, however, if the payment method is specified on the document and not derived automatically from the vendor master, then this will not work.
In this case, you could use a validation based on the payment amount.
kind regards,
George

Down payment amount cannot be higher/lower than the preset value Error

Hello. Can anyone help me with this error. When creating a down payment request from a sales order with a billing plan, I get the message 'Down payment amount cannot be higher/lower than the preset value' and the document isn't released to accounting. When creating the sales order, I included a condition type that I created. The billing plan then calculates the down payment request value with the total sum i.e net value plus condition value. Upon creating the down payment request in VF01, I get this message. I did a test and noticed that, if the condition is not included in the sales order, the down payment request is created without errors. How do I correct this? Thanks for you anticipated response.

Hi
As you are getting error, 'Down payment amount cannot be higher/lower than the preset value' ,please check the total value of the document.So in the sales document ,billing plan check what is the invoice value for the first billing date , also check what is the sales order value.Secondly what is the condition type that has been created and for what purpose it is being used.
Regards
Srinath

FB05 - How to Suppress "Assign Payment Amounts" in SAPMF05A Screen 0614

We are running an inbound remittance advice IDOC and trying to do the processing of the AR clearing from the generated payment advice. In the payment advice we are referencing two different accounts. One is a customer account (type 'D') and one a GL account (type 'S').
In the FB05 call transaction it is not allocating the GL account item to the payment amount. As a result the "Assign Payment Amounts" pop-up window (screen 0614) is displayed and we have to manually press the "Accept" button.
The call transaction BDC session values are being generated by SAP's code of the Remittance IDOC processing program and we cannot manipulate these values (we cannot insert a button press for the "Accept" button). As a result we are trying to figues out how to suppress the "Assign Payment Amounts" pop-up window and automatically press "Accept" the values. We have configured all GL accounts as "Relevant to Cash Flow" as per OSS note 25200.
Thanks in advance
Mark Fleckles

hi all ,
I am using below fms for FB05 posting. but I am getting 'assign payment amounts' popup. how to click on accept button in background or how to suppress the same popup. please help me on this.
POSTING_INTERFACE_START
POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING
POSTING_INTERFACE_END
thanks for your help.
please reply to my gmail : [email protected]
Regards,
Venkat rao
Message was edited by: venkat rao veeramaneni
please reply to my gmail: [email protected]

WHT should be deducted on payment amount instead of invoice amount

Hi All,
if any one help,
i am using 11i and issue is that, while matching PO (which is in USD) and making an invoice, but paying partially then WHT is deducted on invoice amount rather then payment amount.
if i match PO ( which is in functional currency i.e. PKR) then there is no issue and system calculate the tax on payment amount.
Please suggest!
thanks in advance...............
Regards
Asad
Edited by: 801240 on Dec 8, 2010 10:55 PM
Edited by: 801240 on Dec 8, 2010 10:55 PM

I havent worked on 11i But in r12 we can choose Apply Witholding tax "at Payment time" in payable Options
Navigation: Payables Responsibility>>Setup>>Optionn>>Payables Options>>Witholdin tax tab Select "At payment time" in Apply witholding tax area.
You said when invoice is of PKR its deducting on payment but on USD its deducting on invoice amount.
thus i rekon you have different options as per operating units
Send me your system option Screenshots on [email protected] then i will be able to help you better.
Edited by: Attiq on Dec 14, 2010 3:20 AM

F-32 Partial payment amount greater than net amount

Hi Experts,
We have recently a problem in clearing up payments in F-32. When we double-click the item under Partial Payment Tab, the warning message displays "Partial payment amount greater than net amount" then the value in the Payment Amount Column becomes negative. The users need to activate 2 separate entries for partial payment but instead of . How can we do this?
We have to post like this in partial payment under same customer:
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     20.08.2009     20.08.2009     5,000.00-     1,295.12
20110225     1400010330     DZ     19     25.02.2011     25.02.2011     2,000.00-     1,295.12-
So the the Assigned Value should be zero to post.

Thanks @Atif. Ok so now I understand that the "Total Difference Posting" amount inf-32 will create the new amount of the residual payment with Document Type AB.
Now with the Warning Message "Partial Payment Amount greater than the net amount", this is in a overpayment amount that is reflected in transaction F-32, here are the entries:
Assignment Doc Num      Doc Type      Post Key    Net Amt         Partially Paid Amt Payment Amt
2133004220     90005448     RV     01     3,707.02      3,305.71      401.31
2133015007     90020098     RV     01     7,836.68      6,737.25      1,099.43
2133016757     90022362     RV     01     10,521.31      8,603.87      1,917.44
2133137046     90187172     RV     01     11,367.68      0.00      11,367.68
2133137047     90187173     RV     01     1,354.09      0.00      1,354.09
2133137048     90187174     RV     01     1,739.82      0.00      1,739.82
2133137049     90187175     RV     01     994.57      0.00      994.57
20110419     90187176     RV     01     6.42      0.00      6.42
20110421     90187177     RV     01     44.94      0.00      44.94
20110425     90187178     RV     01     19.26      0.00      19.26
20081216     1400003657     DZ     19     3,421.86-     3,394.04-     27.82-
20081222     1400003706     DZ     19     1,000.00-     1,033.17-     33.17-
20090310     1400004396     DZ     19     420.51-     401.25-     19.26-
20090630     1400005319     DZ     19     786.13-     705.94-     80.19-
20090702     1400005349     DZ     19     596.04-     535.88-     60.16-
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     5,000.00-     6,295.12-     1,295.12-
20090824     1400005827     DZ     19     308.16-     295.32-     12.84-
20091027     1400006377     DZ     19     400.72-     375.04-     25.68-
20091215     1400006796     DZ     19     349.89-     337.05-     12.84-
20100608     1400008253     DZ     19     200.09-     189.39-     10.70-
20101019     1400009279     DZ     19     165.85-     155.00-     10.85-
20101019     1400009280     DZ     19     254.65-     238.00-     16.65-
20101019     1400009281     DZ     19     160.64-     157.00-     3.64-
20101130     1400009595     DZ     19     10,000.00-     5,440.92-     4,559.08-
How is this possible that Document numbers 1400003706 and 1400005790 has overpaid amount. And both of them are downpayment documents? Is there any way I can clear them with the Invoices, I am also lost with this kind of scenario?

AP Minimal Payment Amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for