APC value periodic posting?

Hi,
In fixed asset, i don't how what is apc value perdiodic posting. And why use apc value periodic posting?
Thanks, point will be rewarded.
Regards,
Alex

Hi Alex,
APC periodic reposting (T.code ASKB)is done to post the acquisition values to the same asset for a different set of GL accounts.
For ex: If the co.code has to maintian its ledgers in 2 separate sets of books like 1.Operationg COA 2. Country specific COA then we have to post the book values to these separate list of accopunts for 1 transaction. To eanble this we have to create a separate depreciation area which will maintain the country specific accounts. Since in FI-AA we can only have 1 depreciation area as "real time" deprecaition area we should create this area as periodic update for postings.
Hence we need to to <b>askb</b> as soon as we do a regular acuisition postings (ao90) to the operating COA deprecaition area which is usually Area 01.
This way system will update the parallel set of accounts maintained with the acquisition values.
Hope this is clear.
Please let me know if you need any further clarification.
Pls assign points if this is helpful.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Similar Messages

ASKB (APC value Posting).

Dear expert,
What is Use of APC Values posting through T Code ASKB at the time of Fiscal Year Closing of Assets Accounting?
What will be impact in GL account? It will post any amount in ouer leading ledger?
It will affect our Balance sheet or Not?

Hello,
You may review topic 7 (Execute Periodic Posting Program) in the link below regarding ASKB.
Year-End-Closing in Asset Accounting (best practices)
Kind regards

Double posting of APC value in non leading ledger

Hi,
While posting asset, system is posting to both Leading and non leading ledger where as configuration is allowed to post only leading ledger in realtime and periodic posting is allowed in non leading ledger. That cause double posting in non leading ledger on execution of ASKB. Please guide.
Regards,
DC

ASKB is working based on this table "APERB_PROT". So if I remove these entries, no posting will be allowed through ASKB which is possible if I simply not execute ASKB. Here what I am looking for that on posting of original value should only post to leading ledger and with ASKB it should post in non leading ledger because of its configuration.

Posting for different APC values to different Depreciation Areas

Hi All,
I am trying to manage in ECC 6.0, different APC values for different depreciation areas, i.e. APC values differ from one dep area to another. I need to post the APC to GL only (i.e. for the 01 i.e. Book Depreciation area). For the remaining depreciation areas for the purposes of reporting I need to maintain different APC values.
One way to achieve this is by maintaining Parallel ledger. Is there any other way this can be achieved.
Thanks in advance
Krishna

Hi,
Use the trnasaction ABSO and clik in the button Dep. Area.
Now you can fill in the value by depreciation area. (when this is set up) use the Trans act type 100
Paul

Invoice value differing in creation from periodic posting

Hi,
When I do periodic posting simulation and update run, I get the correct value. However when I create invoice using transaction RERAIV and do simulation for the same, the invoice value is coming wrong, (It is different from the value shown in periodic posting.)
This is happening in some cases - about eight cases out of 25 cases.
Kindly guide as to where the error could be.
Regards,
T Saravanan

When you create invoices using RERAIV, the system takes minimum amounts (trivial amounts) into account.
Also try with all the 'selection type' parameter options (Selection using FI documents, Selection using planned items of the cash flow, Selection from FI documents and Cash flow) on the selection screen.
Hope helps.
SM

Calculation of Depreciation on Net Book Value after posting Revaluation on

How to calculate the depreciation on Net book value after posting Balance sheet revaluation ABAW? The depreciation is been calculated on APC and not on NBV, as the APC of asset has been revalued after the revalution posting, ideally the next period depreciation should be calculating on the new NBV, but the system is not doing this. Is there any specific configuration that Iam missing here.
Kindly Reply.
Jyoti

The forum [FPM - General|Enterprise Performance Management (SAP EPM); in which you originally posted your question deals mainly with the financial performance applications otherwise known as Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) carrying the BusinessObjects brand. Your question pertains to SAP [ERP Financials - Asset Accounting|SAP ERP Financials - Asset Accounting; which is covered by another forum. Therefore your message has been moved. Please adjust any bookmarks you might have and post to the appropriate area in the future, that way you are assured you will have the right audience reading your posts.
Thanks and best regards,
[Jeffrey Holdeman|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Jeffrey+Holdeman]
SAP Labs, LLC
BusinessObjects Division
Americas Customer Solutions Adoption (CSA) team

Reduction of APC values uploaded last year

Dear Friends,
My client realized that last year during upload of Asset values, APC values were high and they want to reduce the APC values from This August, by Debiting Accumulated Depreciation Account. They also require that system should not re-calculate Depreciation for the past period. Requirement is to calculate depreciation on the reduced APC values. Please guide how to achieve this.

Dear Bernhard,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Client do not want to post unplanned depreciation. By posting thru ABAA, unplanned depreciation can be accounted, which will get posted in the next Dep run. I also understand that thru ABAA transaction code NBV can be reduced.
But the issue is different. Let me explain again.
In the last Fiscal year, during upload APC values were uploaded with excess amount. Now, disregarding the Depreciation posted for the last one year, the client want to reduce APC values, by debiting Accumulated Dep account. With this there will not be any change of NBV. Client do not want recalculate Dep Values last year. The requirement is only to reduce APC values, by debiting the Accumulated Dep and keep the NBV intact.
Example as on 01 Jul 2014.
APC value of an asset     : 3,375,000
Accumulated Dep           ; -1,912,500
NBV                              : 1,462,500
To remove the excess APC values uploaded last year, client wants to post 675,000. by debiting accumulated Dep account. Now the values should be as follows:
APC value of an asset     : 2,700,000 (3,375,000 - 675,000= 2,700,000)
Accumulated Dep           ;-1,237,500(-1,912,500 +675,000= -1,237,500)
NBV                              : 1,462,500
Hence there shouldn't be any change in NBV.
Does any one come across this situation ? how to proceed. ? which T code and what is Trans type?
Regards,
Venu

Parallel accounting - different APC values for different ledgers

< MODERATOR: Please don't post in multiple forums. Message locked. Please review the [forum rules|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement]>
Hi all,
I defined the following 3 depreciation areas:
01 - IFRS - posts in realtime / target ledger grp = 0L
30 - local - posts depreciation only / target ledger grp = Z1
60 - difference 30-01 - posts only APC directly / target ledger grp = Z1
0L contains leading ledger (IFRS)
Z1 contains parallel ledger (local)
Then I defined a new transaction type for acquisition (e.g. Z10) and limited it to depreciation area 01. This transaction type I wanted to use for acquisitions which are relevant only for IFRS ledger.
Now I post an $1000 invoice using transaction F-90 (acquisition with vendor). I select posting key 70, in the field Account I select an asset under construction and I choose the transaction type Z10.
After proceeding this step I would expect that the amount $1000 would be posted only in IFRS ledger. But it is not, it is posted in both ledgers.
If I want to run the transaction ASKB (APC values posting), I get an error message "Account 14001 in company code 0100 cannot be directly posted to". The account 14001 is the acquisition account for the AuC used when posting the invoice.
Why I get this message? How can I get the values posted correctly (i.e. only to IFRS ledger)?
Thanks for all ideas
Zbynek

Did you get a solution to your issue.?
Would you please mind sharing your solution ?
I am in a similar situation where we have area 01 as local Gapp and area 15 as IFRS.
we want to have 01 posted to leading and 15 to nonleading ledgers.
thanks.

Field Account Determination value in Posting Parameter tabpage

Hi RE-Gurus,
I have a specific requirement.
In a given RE-FX Lease Out Contract, we enter Account Determination Value on the Posting parameters tab page which is responsible for determination of the G/L account which shall be posted at the time of carrying out Periodic Posting.
The requirement is that i want to control the change authorization for the same for specific set of users.
This means if i have 10 users who have Contract change authorization, only one of them shall have authorization to change the Account Determination Value on the Posting parameters tab page and rest 9 users shall not be allowed to change the Account Determination Value.
I hope i m clear in stating my requirement.
Plz revert back ASAP.
Thanks,
Pankaj

Hi,
please have a look at SAP note 1005831 which provides BAdI BADI_RECA_AUTH_CHECK for implementing customer specific authorization checks for real estate objects. The BADI provides also an example implementation for your reference.
Regards,
Franz

APC Value and Plan Value for an Asset.

HI Gurus,
I am developing a report where I have to display the APC value and Plan value of an Asset.Can anyone pls give an insight how to find this for the Asset.

Hi,
why don´t you use the logical database ADA which most of the FI-AA standard reports do? The logical database is a service to get this information without developing all the READ information and translation by yourself, especially when talking about mid-year-reporting, consistence checks, etc..
If you decide to use ADA, then the events GET ANLA0, GET ANLAV and GET ANLCV are from interest for you for information about APC and planned/posted depreciation value.
Regards,
Markus

Report to show APC value changes

Is there a report which will show all the APC value changes for an asset. The asset acquisition/transactions report shows addition of new cost (new aquisition). The requirement is the changes to the cost, for instance adding additional cost to an asset or any credit memos done. Retirements should not be a part of this report.
Edited by: sapfincon on Sep 16, 2009 12:54 AM

Hi,
if you have to differentiate acquisition postings in the same fiscal year, then in fact you have to use 2 different transaction types. You can change the transaction type in ABZON according to your needs during the posting.
If the transactions are in 2 different fiscal years, then it should be no problem. The acquisition from the prior year will not be shown isolated, it is contained in the cumulated APC amount at fiscal year start. This is history sheet group YA. And the current year addition can be shown under it´s history sheet group assigned to transaction type 100.
Regards,
Markus

Transfering APC Values Only

Any thoughts on how to transfer asset APC values only on an parital intercompany transfer of an asset for a company that uses depreciation to the day from one Co Code to another ????
Example: Asset 10001 on CoCode 1001 has a APC value of $15,000 and Acc Depr of $5,000.
Need to transfer $5,000 APC value only to a new asset in CoCode 1002 (No accumlated depreciation value s/b transfered)
Original Values
Asset 10001 Co Code 1001
APC            $15,000
Acc Depr         5,000
Net Value         10,000
New Values after partial transfer
Asset 10001 Co Code 1001
APC            $ 10,000
Acc Depr         5,000
Net Value         5,000
Asset 10010 Co Code 1002
APC            $ 5,000
Acc Depr               0
Net Value         5,000

try to customize a new transaction type (e.g. copy 300)
and use tcode OA81 - special handling of transfer posting - Trans. APC only
A.

REM-periodic posting

Hello Gurus,
     I tried assigning corresponding G/L account in general contract account determination to be able to use periodic posting transaction(FOIQ). Since business area was set as a required field in FI configuration, error log was 'account requires business area' upon execution of FOIQ transaction. Can you help me find way to activate the business area field when using that transaction? via config or screen variant/layout?
    When business area was set as 'optional' field, line items were posted in AR without error using the same transaction. For the credit side business area specified in the general contract was automatically captured by the system but for the debit side, business area contains no value. Does this has something to do with the posting key or special G/L indicator?
     Thanks in advance for your help.
Jorgz

This is not the appropriate forum for functional questions on SAP Real Estate Management. You may try the ERP forum.
Kind regards, Markus

Different APC value for different ledgers

Hi,
we maintain two ledgers, one for IFRS, the other for local accounting. Considering some type of assets, we need to post different APC values to the IFRS ledger and the local ledger. How can this be done?
thanks in advance,
Zbynek

Hi Arup,
Yes, absoutely - you can use different RD for the same VRF on different PEs. In fact, if you have chosen to use the PE_IP_Address:Customer format of the RD then logically, the same VRF on different PEs will have different RDs because the PE addresses themselves are different.
There is no obvious advantage or disadvantage to having the same or a different RD per the same VRF on different PEs. The RD is a tool that allows BGP to differentiate between identical prefixes from different VRFs on a single router. However, the value of RD has no influence on how the prefix will be assigned to a particular VRF on the destination PE. For this, route targets are always used.
There is one specific use of different RDs: Advertising multiple paths to a single multihomed VRF site. Because to BGP, the entire value of <RD><Prefix><Netmask> is used in the best path selection algorithm, if two PEs connected to the same VRF site used the same RD, destination PEs and route reflectors would choose and advertise only one of them (remember: BGP always selects and advertises only a single best path). With different RDs, destination PEs and route reflectors see formally different NLRIs, and they perform the best path selection for each of them individually even though the actual <Prefix><Netmask> is the same.
However, for simple VRF deployments, having a unique or identical RD on two PEs for the same VRF makes no significant difference.
I hope other friends here will add their own thoughts about this.
Best regards,
Peter

Parallel Ledger APC Values Via A Clearing Account

Hi Folks,
Would appreciate any help you can with this.
Situation :
Fixed Assets is not integrated with Vendor Payables.
Fixed Assets is set up with Real and Delta Depreciation Areas.
When an Invoice is posted in Vendor Payables the offset is to a Fixed Assets Clearing Account - this Document updates the Leading Ledger and all Non Leading Parallel Ledgers with the same amount.
When the amount is posted against the Asset via ABSO the offset is the Fixed Assets Clearing Account.
The problem is :
If there are different APC values between IFRS and Local GAAP this leaves the amount equal to the Delta posting sitting in the clearing account for the Local GAAP Ledger.
Is there any way to change this behaviour or a different process to be followed ?. not sure what can be done with this delta amount left in the Ledger specifc clearing account.
Thanks,
Andrew

HI,
I am not sure if it is helpful but what you can do is to define an asset movement type limited to a valuation area, which allows you to post for example acquisitions only in on valuation area, but not in the other one.
Thus you can post ABSO with one asset movement type for one valuation area (APC-value X) for another valuation area use another movement type and post APC value Y.
Anyway the difference of the APC value (thats not ativated) needs to be posted to an P&L account.
Maybe there are other/better suggestions from other people.
Best regards, Christian

APC value periodic posting?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for