Aperture 3 and iPhoto library

After importing my iPhoto 09 photos into Aperture (using the store files in the Aperture library option) I decided I was happy with the results and no longer needed any reference to iPhoto so I deleted the iPhoto library (under projects & albums) from within Aperture and this removed all the photos that I just imported. I'm bit confused because if I imported them into Aperture then why would they still be linked to an iPhoto library. Shouldn't they be stored as a master in the Aperture library?

so I deleted the iPhoto library (under projects & albums) from within Aperture and this removed all the photos that I just imported. I'm bit confused because if I imported them into Aperture then why would they still be linked to an iPhoto library.
When you imported them they are put in a Folder called iPhoto Library. You can drag them out of that. But because you deleted the Folder, they were deleted too.
Regards
TD

Similar Messages

  • Aperture 2 and iPhoto library

    I know one can import the iPhoto library into the Aperture projects pane.
    and have it as referenced images.
    If you then add an delete images via the iPhoto application, how do you update the iPhoto images seen in Aperture?

    Not the hugest fan of iPhoto (it suddenly slows with medium big libraries, around 10% of Apple's stated max)) but apart from Front Row...
    In iPhoto you can successfully view and scan panoramas in full-screen, zoomed as far or as little as you want, even if the files are big. In Aperture you can't really do this, and the zoom range is inappropriate. The navigator in iPhoto is streets ahead, as is the one in Lightroom. The Aperture Navigator is designed for normal aspects and small files - it gets laughably small, with big files, or long photos, and has not been coded to be smart about this kid of picture. And Aperture is too manly in its minimal appearance to show you a ghost of the image behind the tiny nav, like LR and iP, both of which are much faster in practice for this kind of thing.
    And in iPhoto, workaday exporting is ten times faster.
    Guys I am finding this "Aperture is for men, iPhoto is for women and children" stuff a good reason not to use the prog. Aperture is for men with lots of free time! The sliders in 2.1 are still like pulling a car with your teeth, compared to the competition, once two or three adjustments are in play.
    best
    Paul

  • Aperture and iPhoto Library

    Hello,
    I played with aperture @ the store. But i noticed i have to import pictures from the iPhoto library in the Aperture library. So i have the pictures twice on the disk. Isnt it possible to make Aperture use the iPhoto library?
    Thank you in advance
    Edgar

    Well , it would be great to do someting like that. I
    like aperture a lot, but then again, if i want to use
    iWeb i need iPhoto again and same with the other
    dedicated Apple programms. The integration is always
    handy.
    Is there a special reason why apple didnt add this
    support for sharing librarys? Because aperture can
    import the raw foto from the camera?
    Well, I think it's because they really wanted the ability to do a lot of complex editing without taking up extra room on the HD if they did not need to. In iPhoto all edits are stored directly in am image file whereas in Aperture they let you make a lot more editing choices and saving each one as an image (especially a non-JPG image) would just take up a huge amount of choice.
    In the future I think they'll offer an API so other programs can see thumbnails from an Aperture library as well, and also export individual images from it even if they are just versions. At the moment things will just have to be a little more manual with Aperture for a while - though I think you can alleviate that by exporting a project when you are finished editing in Aperture - take the exported set of JPG's that you then store in an iPhoto library and use like you normally would with iPhoto. That would take up more space but the good news is that keywords you assign in Aperture are automatically picked up by iPhoto on import, so you can still search in iPhoto by keyword, and then you can make use of any images in iPhoto in exactly the same way as you normally would.
    If you use the new ability of iPhoto to reference files in place you could create an export directory and replace the files there on the fly from Aperture if you re-edited them. You'd have to remove them first as Aperture will not overwrite files on export.

  • Photos says iphoto library cannot be repaired--yet it loads fine in iphoto and iphoto library manager

    photos cant load my iphoto library. It says there are errrors and that iphoto library cannot be repaired--yet it loads fine in iphoto and iphoto library manager. Any help would be appreciated

    pneb wrote:
    photos cant load my iphoto library. It says there are errrors and that iphoto library cannot be repaired--yet it loads fine in iphoto and iphoto library manager. Any help would be appreciated
    You probably have to run one or all of the IPHOTO resets/repairs over your library.   Its in IPHOTO help which keys you have to hold down while opening IPHOTO.
    Sorry don't remember which keys.
    these sites may be of interest to you
    photo getting started
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204655
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204410
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204264
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204414

  • Common itunes and iphoto library across many apple devices & users using AExtreme?

    Is it possible to maintain a common itunes library and iphoto library shared across multiple users and multiple devices in a home via airport extreme or via airport express and a NAS?

    i realized that an itunes library folder is different from an itunes media folder although the later resides in the former. turns out while each user account with apple should have its own library they can point to the same media folder.
    right now i have my dad and my itunes library on my mac point to the same media folder inside /Users/Shared and that way we are able to access the same music and movies for our iphones and ipads.
    i guess now all we need to do is move this to a network drive and make itunes point there.

  • About Safari cache and iPhoto library fragmentation...

    Some days back, with the help of iDefrag I found out that my entire HD was badly fragmented inspite of having 95GBs free space. So I decided to do what an average mac user does to fix this... I backed up everything my my TM drive and restore the entire from there. Then I ran iDefrag and things were neat. A lot of my speed related issues are not solved.
    However, I do notice that Safari cache and iPhoto library are always reported as fragmented portions on the HD by iDefrag. Infact, I often see the colored ball - wait indicator when switching tabs in safari or when I work with photos in iPhoto. I dont mind clearing the cache of safari. i'm somewhat worried about my iPhoto library. I have all my personal and family pics in one library as thats easier to maintain.
    I just want to know what is the ideal thing for a mac user to do here...
    PS: noticed that even linux virtual disk of vmware is completely fragmented, which i made after i restored with TM.

    Watch your CPU usage via the +Activity Monitor+ app (in your Applications/Utilities folder).
    When it starts, select either +All Processes+ or +Active Processes+ in the toolbar, and sort the list by the +% CPU+ column, so the highest numbers are on top, and select the CPU tab towards the bottom.
    For this purpose, also select +View > Update Frequency > Less Often+ from the Menubar.
    Various processes will "spike" up and down normally as they do things, then are idle, so you need to watch it for a while and get a feel for the processes that are using the most CPU, and the +% Idle+ at the bottom.
    When the slowdown occurs, see if something changes significantly, especially if the +% idle+ goes to near zero. If that happens, see what process(es) are using the most CPU.
    If the process(es) involved aren't familiar to you, post their names here (and or check this out: http://triviaware.com/macprocess/all)
    You may also want to select the +System Memory+ tab towards the bottom. Keep an eye on the total of Free and Inactive memory (if they're near zero, you may need more), and the +Page outs+ (if that's high, it's another indication you may need more memory).
    And see this Apple Support article: Mac OS X: Reading system memory usage in Activity Monitor

  • Updated MacBook air to 10.10.3. Can I remove iPhoto and iPhoto Library now?

    Updated MacBook air to 10.10.3. Can I remove iPhoto and iPhoto Library now or I should better wait until migration process will handle the question?

    Yes, I've done it some minutes ago.
    I have backup of all my info on external drive and in Google Drive. Just what I want - delete unnecessary data from my small MacBook Air drive.
    Will new MacOS delete all old staff automatically?

  • Share one iTunes and iPhoto library between 2 computers

    I have a network with an iMac and a G5 and I'd like to use a ethernet hard drive to store a common iTunes music and iPhoto library so either computer uses the same files and isn't depending upon the other computer being turned on (so I think this rules out a firewire or USB external drive). Any suggestions. Both computers would need read/write access to the ethernet hard drive. Thanks.

    If you turn on iTunes sharing in the network settings and then point each copy of iTunes to that ethernet HD, it should be fine.

  • Can Aperture 3 and Iphoto sinc library ?

    Hi .
    I´m not photo professional but I want more reosurce with my photos. I bought Aperture 3 and I feel I have most I need from Iphoto. I don´t want have too many space with two photo libraries and have a risk to loose something. It´s possible to sinc my aperture library with Iphoto ? For a hobbist you think Iphoto is enough ?
    Thanks,
    Daniel Rodrigues
    Brazil

    No, you cannot sync your iPhoto Library and your Aperture Library.
    You will have to make up your mind which of the two you will want to use in future.
    If you really feel the need for the advanced editing and organizational tools Aperture has to offer, you can have an easy transit from iPhoto to Aperture by importing your iPhoto Library as it is into Aperture. This will keep all your meta tags, events (now called projects), albums, slideshows, etc.
    Aperture has a steep learning curve, but it is possible to use initially no more than than you did use in iPhoto and so gradually get to know the program.
    The way back from Aperture to iPhoto is not so easy, for you cannot import your Aperture lIbrary into iPhoto. It is a one-way road. So try it thoroughly before you commit yourself.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • After migrating from iPhoto: Aperture library 81GB and iPhoto Library 17GB

    I Have ~10K images almost all .jpgs. I just completed the "rebuild from masters" command after experimenting with Aperture for a while. I was surprised to find that my Aperture Library was 81GB and my remaining iPhoto library was 17GB. First of all I selected "move" from the "rebuild from masters" command so I thought my iPhoto Library would just disappear. When I open iPhoto all my pictures are still there. So why the large library size difference?
    -thanks

    How long since, you installed Aperture 3? You may need to leave the machine running for quite a while before things start to settle down. Sounds like you may be short of RAM and or a library with a lot of faces. Allan

  • Aperture and iPhoto Library (not my own)

    A friend has sent me a copy of his iPhoto library containing pictures he's asked me to adjust for him. His version of iPhoto is the 2009 release having come with his new MacBook Pro. My iPhoto is version 6. It won't open the library my friend sent. Is there anything I can do with my Aperture (current) to extract the photos from the disk my friend sent? Any other ideas?
    Thanks.
    Terry

    Insert the Disc into your Mac. On it you will see an iPhoto Library icon. Right Click on it and go 'Show Package Contents'. A Finder window will open with the Library exposed.
    Regards
    TD

  • Aperture and iPhoto library integration.

    So here is my predicament:-
    I'm new to Aperture but have more than enough experience in iPhoto. I'm 99% sure that I'm just missing something small so hopefully this wont be a hard question to answer.
    I tend to use iPhoto as a photo management program as I love the way it looks and feels; especially the new version as part of iLife '11. Now I understand you can import your iPhoto library into Aperture HOWEVER is it possible to then update the Aperture library later on down the track without re-cataloguing (think thats the best way to put it) the iPhoto library all together?

    Terrence, sounds like you have your brain wrapped around aperture quite well. I do not. So please forgive me if this question is redundant. Sometimes you just have to ask in your own words, if you know what I mean. I am about to download Aperture's 30 day trial.
    In essence, iPhoto and Aperture cannot share a library, but they can access each other's libraries? Can you just preview iPhoto's library from within Aperture and vice-versa without having to import the photos? And if you import your existing iPhoto library into Aperture you then have two copies of each photo, one in Aperture and one in iPhoto, thus doubling the space on the HDD that photos are taking up?
    I do understand the changes made in one program cannot be viewed in another.
    Thank you for taking time to share your expertise with us!

  • Aperture and iPhoto library deleted

    I upgraded my Aperture w/no problem. About one month later, all images in Aperture and iPhoto dissapeared. "Genius Bar" checked, said no problem and didn't have a clue. Bought a Time-Machine backup at store, had a consultant there show me how to set up, but he had a problem as the Airport Utility was gone. He said that was rare and downloaded it. He suggested there could be a connection to all this. I'm afraid to use the iMac. Help? Doing search for images or libraries no good, will show libraries, but with zero files. Tnx.  Leif

    How did you import your old iPhoto photos? And with what Aperture version?
    Before the unified Aperture - iPhoto library has been introduced, it was possible to import an iPhoto library as referenced. This left all originals in the iPhoto library, so iPhoto continued to work, but Aperture could use the master files. Is that the way you imported your iPhoto library, with the master files in there original location?
    When trying to e.g. export a file Aperture says 'The selected original image is either offline or not found. Please reconnect it and try again.'.
    That is the typical error message, when Aperture cannot access the original files. And Aperture wil not be able to do anything with your images, unless you restore the missing originals.
    Just moved my Aperture-library to my new iMac.
    Where did you move your Aperture library from ? From an older mac?  From a backup?
    Did Aperture work on that old Mac and could access the originals?
    Do you still have that old mac, and is there any chance that recovery software could retrieve the missing original files on that mac?
    Sometimes Aperture reports originals as missing, even if they are managed inside the Aperture library.
    You can find out, where Aperture is looking for the original files, if you select some image files in the browser and use Aperture's command "File > Locate Referenced Files".
    In the panel that opens, you can see the path to missing files in the upper right corner below the thumbnail.
    What do you see, when you use that command?

  • Aperture Library and iPhoto library are different sizes for the SAME images

    Hi.
    I'm a PROUD new Aperture owner (licensee) since last night. YIPPEE!!!
    I imported my photos from iPhoto without a hitch. The same number of images, and I can access them all. Now, I know the two apps do different things, but I was expecting parity between the folders or Aperture's folder being heavier. It's MUCH less. Even with my previews. My iPhoto library is about 32GB and the Aperture library is about 9GB.
    Is it because iPhoto is doing full size JPG previews of everything? That would add approximately 10GB, I think, but the size disparity is confusing me.
    Any ideas what happened? Is all well?
    Scott

    You can choose to store your images IN (eg. copied) the aperture library, or as referenced masters (eg. you keep your own folder structure on a disk, and aperture only keeps the metadata and previews of it in the library). Main downside of referenced masters is that your images aren't backed up in the vault--you need your own backup strategy. Main upsides are that you can easily access your images in the finder, or with other apps, and that you can keep your images on another disk from your library. I have a Macbook Pro as my main computer, but my image library wouldn't fit on the internal drive, so I keep the Aperture library on the internal, and all my raw files on an external. I can access the previews for other purposes (mail, web, slide shows, etc.) when I'm away from my desk.
    I have no idea why the iphoto library is so large--don't use iphoto much.

  • Aperture 3 VS. iPhoto Library management policies

    Let me start this off with the fact that I am new to the whole Mac scene.  I am used to the PC world of managing everything neatly in folders and subfolders inside My Pictures folder.  In PC land I was using importing everything automaticaly  with my Nikon software.  I seriously miss its ability to lable my folders exactly as I wanted them.  I could then use whatever software I needed to edit from simple stuff with my Nikon software suite, to Correl Draw, to Photoshop.  Sonce everything was left in the same folders, "library managment" was much simpler.  Manually going in and moving pictures around was easy.  Before the switch to Apple, I spent many many hours researching and studying. 
    So I have been usign my new MacBook Pro exclusivly for about 6 months now and still can not get my libraries organized as effectivly as I would like.  The whole lack of one central folder location, has me thrown off.  Okay lets start with my questions.  I have a pile of them, so my apologies in advance...
    1)  Can I use one library for both applications?  I started off with iPhoto, then purchased Aperture 3 as soon as it was avalible.  I see that deleting fluff in one does not currently correspond to the other program.  When setting up Aperture, I imported my iPhoto library.  It seems to me that it doubled the amount of space used for my photos...
    2)  From what I have read, I am lead to understand that iPhoto is less of a space hog.  It saved layers of edits over the pictures, while Aperture 3 saves each as a new photo.  All done seamlessly behind the scenes.  Is this correct?     
    3)  When I imported the iPhoto library to Aperture, it forgot all my faces I had named.  Yes I have Aperture setup to see the faces thing... I think.   Can I fix this simply without going through the whole naming process again? 
    4)  Can I "manually" import/export the librarys simply by dropping them to the desktop, and renaming them then dropping them back in the picutres folder? 
    I would like to really consolidate and trim down the space being used.  I have over 100 gigs of photos per library and that is being VERY choosy about what I save.  All my professional work I shoot in RAW.  As for the two programs, I see no real reason to keep iPhoto, as it seems all the other software programs like mail and iWork integrate just as well with Aperture.  
    5)  How do I set a high quality desktop image from my own librarys?  This is super frustrating!!!  The only way I can seem to get high resolution pictures reliably, is if I can figure out how to open it in Safari, then set as a desktop.    Sometimes using system preferances it will work, but mostly I get really low resolution shots that look like maybe they are blown up preview or thumbnail images.  Even delibertly using the same shot and trying to find it in the multiple locations I find, I can't seem to duplicate a process that gets me a clean shot via System Preferances.  It seems that the iPhoto versions are higher quality.
    I have gigs woth of personal shots I would love to browse through and use, but everytime it is a huge headache to do so....  I think most of my issues here are in understandign how to navigate the pictures in the Mac OS X.  I think ideally I would like to dump iPhoto and stick to just Aperture.  Mostly, I am loving the way all the programs in OS X seem to integrate and work together.  Just having some serious stumbling blocks with the photography apects, and that was the primary reason I switched to a Mac.  
    6)  So will the rest of the software like iMovie, iWeb, Mail, and Garage Band work as well with Aperture as iPhoto? 
    I need to sort out all the above issues and decide what direction to go and how to go about rebuilding my libraries.  I have gigs worth of older family shots, downloaded images, freinds photography, and other random images I would like to keep seperated from my professional work.  Aperture is without a dought a much better program for my professional, and daily use.  I am just having issues accessign my work directly like I used to do on the PC no matter what program on the Mac I am working with. 

    I'll try to help you out a bit more:
    First I'd recommend a post here by Kirby Krieger
    This will get you on par with Aperture workflow and nomenclature. I can only reccomend you a good book if you're able to understand Dutch ;-) And BTW a book or manual is easier to pause then a video ;-)
    The Well-trod Path. Walk it unless you have a map for a different route.
    The Library is your image database. It contains all the information Aperture has about your images: where they are stored on your computer/drives/network, how you have them organized within Aperture, what adjustments you have made to them, all the pre-Aperture metadata (EXIF, IPTC, keywords, etc.) they had before you imported them into Aperture, and all the Aperture metadata (Version names, ratings, color labels, Stacks, additional keywords, etc.) you assign to them from within Aperture. The Library also contains small copies of each image (in effect, thumbnails, but in Aperture larger than actual thumbnails and called "Previews").
    The image is the core record in your Aperture database. The database is a giant list of images with a whole bunch of information assigned to each image.
    Within Aperture you can view individual images and any grouping of images. You can create a group based on any of the information you have about your images.
    The Project is your primary image holder. It has a unique, privileged relationship with your images: Every image must be in a Project; No image can be in more than one Project. You should make a Project from every actual, out-in-the-world photo shoot that you do. Shoot=Project. Stick to this (the mis-naming of "Project" is one of the worst interface decisions made in Aperture).
    You will regularly want to view your images in groups other than the Project in which they reside. Aperture provides several specific containers for this (as well as superb tools for creating ad hoc groupings). As a family, those containers are Albums. Aperture includes (regular) Albums, Smart Albums, and the following albums dedicated to special tasks: Book, Light Table, Slide Show, Web Journal, Web Page. Any image can be in any album, and can be in as many albums as you want.
    As your Aperture database grows, you will want to organize your Projects and Albums. Aperture provides Folders to aid you. Folders hold groups of Projects, Albums, and other Folders. Folders cannot contain images which are not in a Project or Album: You do not put images in Folders; you put containers in Folders.
    The organization of your image database is entirely for you to customize for your needs.
    There are two additional pieces of the Aperture puzzle every new user needs to understand in order to make good use of it.
    In additional to what I listed above, your Library may or may not contain your original image files. Each image in Aperture has an original. Aperture is non-destructive -- your original image files are never altered. If the original image file is contained within your Library, it is called a Managed Master (Aperture's pointer to this file, and the file itself, are both inside the Library). If the original image file is not contained within your Library, it is called a Referenced Master (the pointer in your Aperture Library points to a file outside your Aperture Library). Referenced Masters bring some important advantages -- but the new user of Aperture can rely on Managed Masters until the need for Referenced Masters arises. Aperture makes is easy to convert your original image files back and forth from Managed to Referenced.
    A Version is the name given to the variants and copies you make of you original image within Aperture. You use Aperture's tools to make Adjustments to images. Each group of adjustments you make to one image is saved as a Version. You can (and should) create as many Versions as you need. Versions appear as images, but are simply text instructions which tell Aperture what Adjustments to make to the original image file. Aperture presents these to you on-the-fly. This is brilliant. It means that Versions are minuscule compared to Masters. The gain in storage and computational efficiency is enormous.
    This also means that your images in Aperture do not exist as image format files. In order to create an image format file, you must export the image from within Aperture. There is no reason to do this until you need an image format file outside of Aperture.
    Aperture, then, is best understood as a workspace for
       storing
        organizing
        adjusting
        preparing for publication, and
        publishing
    digital photographs.
    Your workflow is
        shoot
        import as Project(s)
        add image-specific metadata
        organize into Albums, organize Albums and Projects with Folders
        make adjustments to images (crop, rotate, change exposure, etc. etc. etc)
        prepare for publication
        publish.
    If you still need to synchronize between computers (which or NOT running Aperture) you could still be using your old folder structure. Import then from the _raw folder, organize and manage them in Aperture and use relocate masters to move them to the correct position. In Aperture you could setup a Project per shoot, and then (Smart)albums in that project for what used to be subfolders when you where working on Windows. For synchronizing between Aperture using computers it best to copy libraries. (You can export a project as a new library as well)
    Then for other RAW converters, take a look at why people recommend CaptureNX. It's mostly because of initial conversion. That is because CapertureNX is able to read in camera settings whereas other converters cannot. For some Nikon's color rendering in Aperture might be a bit of, but you can correct that while developing. Personally I had only one occasion where I wanted to edit in ACR instead of Aperture. (Because I needed a gradient adjustment and Aperture at that time did not have brushes yet) As you mentioned yourself already, one converter is usually the best choice. Pick one that suits you and stick with it.
    For HDR, there are some plugins for that, otherwise export to 16-bit TIFF (which is essentially RAW), do the HDR in PS and import back again. Not that big-a-deal.
    For there rest, when you encounter some problems anywhere on the Mac, think of the easiest solution you can imagine, that usually how it works on the Mac. That why you hardly ever have to leave your Aperture interface while organizing your photo's.

Maybe you are looking for