Application's Disk Usage

I was wondering, does the memory the Apps use on the iPod take up the same memory used for music and video? Or does it use a different internal memory? Might sound stupid, but i was just wondering

Luckily, like the PP said, they are (mostly) really small. I've already downloaded 28 apps (little crazy, I know), and all together they're 31.9 MB. I've seen a few apps that are big, but very, very few. So you shouldn't have to free up toooo much space, hopefully

Similar Messages

  • Visualize Ram / disk usage desktop application

    Hey everyone,
    I want to experiment with visualizing realtime ram usage / disk usage in the desktop background, it should also be a bit interactive (when the user moves his mouse the color could change for example) i want to start very basic.
    Can someone point me in the right direction how to begin this? I can program in C#/asp.net, i saw some f# examples but i don't even know how to run them :)
    Tx so much for any guidance.
    Borrie

    Hello Borrie,
    you can use the PerformanceCounter class to get current RAM usage and disk usage(see
    [1] for more information).
    For the visualization, you can use the DataVisualizetion package from the WPF ToolKit [2].
    There is a sample project about visualizing ram usage at
    [3].
    [1]
    http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/C_Sharp/Q_26646616.html
    [2] http://wpf.codeplex.com/
    [3] http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/301389/WPF-Memory-Usage-Chart
    Regards,
    Bo Liu
    Developer-Hotline for MSDN Online Germany
    Disclaimer:
    Please take into consideration, that further inquiries cannot or will be answered with delay.
    For further information please contact us per telephone through the MSDN-Entwickler-Hotline:
    http://www.msdn-online.de/Hotline
    For this post by the MSDN-Entwickler-Hotline the following terms and conditions
    apply: Trademarks,
    Privacy
    as well as the separate
    terms of use for the MSDN-Entwickler-Hotline .

  • Windows 8.0 ntoskernel has producing 100% disk usage

    hello i am also having the %100 disk usage problem and am starting a thread to upload my etl. file and
    see if i can get a solution. thnx. i should also mention i have tried every suggestion i have read on the internet even ones that worked for other people did not work for me i.e. (switching to high performance power plan, disabling cd drive, etc.) no matter
    what i try "system" is always utilizing 90%-100% of my hard drive.
    the issue started with windows 7 Ent edition and I decided to reflash the drive Cof my  Laptop  HP Probook 6470B with windows 8.0 ENT 64 bits and has the
    same symptom ntoskrnl.exe is causing hiccups on I/O  and delays . The access to C on windows 8 compared h Windows 7 is better  but continue showing the issue. 
    Other peers on the same company not complaint of this delay but I'm sure that they have same symptom.
    the symptom is that the Ntoskernel read and write constantly  few bytes  for fractions of second but repeatedly, the effect is that  the queue disk
    is high and this issue no let to use the drive C, the system need to wait that the drive is free to let that other applications can use the drive SATA.
    I try to share my .etl collected with  windows performance analyzer ,  but "ONE drive" application no let my up more of 100MB in single
    file.
    If you can help provide some space to upload the file will be appreciated.
    Regards
    Luis Velazquez

    Hi  Wanikiya,
    Unfortunately I can´t remove the Mcafee sw due that is is a policy of my company.
    Checking the MS Performance tool you can see that the behavior that show the disk is caused not by Mcafee process. You can select only Process system (4) and right click and select  filter selection you can see that the output match exactly with the
    disk behavior.
    when you put the mouse and  click the top 100 % line of the graph you will see a message like this:
    Path name- c:\$logfile
    IO Init Stack -- [Root] /ntoskrnl.exe ? /ntoskernel.exe?/nto..../fvevol.sys!?/volmgr.sys!/partmagr.sys!?
    the Pathname change in each point of the graph but the IO Init stack remain the same.
    I'm afraid the the SATA drive is having an issue and windows try to fix.
    But if you found something more let me know.
    Let me tell you that I'm using bit locker encryption and all the data on my disk has been encrypted.
    Any idea will be welcome.

  • Disk Usage stuck at 100%, Factory installed windows 8 running like a turtle not being able to use my laptop. What should i do?

    I have a HP Pavillion Sleekbook 15-b002ee with Third generation core i5 processor 1.7 GHz, 500 GB Hard disk and 4 GB of RAM installed. Windows 8 came pre installed on it.
    I bought this laptop 11 months ago and it worked fine for 10 months and then from the last month its presenting unusual problems. My disk usage is stuck at 100% and the laptop freezes and never lets me work or do anything. Heres what i have already done
    to solve the issue but have been unsuccessful:
    1) I have reset my PC completely and reinstalled windows 8 using the factory setup. Didnt solve the issue, newly installed windows displays the disk usage 100% and the performance is same i.e the system freezes.
    2) I have tried adjusting my paging file, no change made a difference to the performance of my laptop. The default system managed Paging file size is something around 3.89 Gb. Does my problem have anything to do with my paging file?
    3) I have tried solving this issue by disabling the "Windows Search" and "Superfetch" services and still it didnt solve the problem.
    4) I have also run checkdisk on my hard drive completely. It took me a complete day to do so but still no change.
    5) Before resetting my laptop, an error called "Kernel_data_inpage(http.sys)" used to come on my upgraded windows 8.1. Whats the issue?
    So what should i do? Is there any problem with my hardware? Is my hard drive having bad sectors and is that causing the problem? Or is there any other technical problem which i couldnt yet find out?
    I have explained my problem in a lot detail and i would like a clear answer please, i have been at this issue for many days and this forum seems like the last place where i can find relevant answer because Google isnt helping.
    Thanks in advance.

    Ask here: http://h30434.www3.hp.com/. 
    This web site is for help in writing software and you are not planing in doing that. In the future, look around to see what others are saying before posting to a forum. If you can not understand what others are saying most likely you are in the wrong
    forum, and chances. are your questions will be ignored .
    If you are looking for help on a particular Microsoft product, start your search from support.microsoft.com instead of going to a random Microsoft forum. But since you got a HP laptop, chances are you have software prompted by HP as well, like antivirus/printer
    applications etc, so better ask HP first.
    Visual C++ MVP

  • Itunes wont disable disk usage

    Ok so heres the deal: I just upgraded to a new desktop that runs under windows vista and thought that moving my old library to this new computer would be a snap. I checked out this site for directions on using my 30g classic as a hard drive to make the move. I followed the directions step by step and everything went smoothly up until the "Switch the iPod back to automatic update". I unchecked the Enable disk use tab, hit Apply, synced all my tunes back onto my iPod, but for some reason all the data from my old library is still on it. And it wont let me eject my iPod because it says it contains files that are in use by another application. How can get all that info off my ipod safely?
    edit: in a nutshell, I should only have 10.57 gigs of music on my iPod, but it still shows that i have 10.57 gigs of music and 12.40 gigs of "other"
    Also, where did all my play lists, ratings, and playcounts go? Can I get them back somehow?
    Message was edited by: joshyloshy_1234

    Conal Ho wrote:
    Disabling the "Enable disk usage" should prevent the iPod shuffle from being mounted as a volume on the Mac desktop. In fact, this is exactly what happens in other iPods that allows disk usage.
    That's right, but the iPod shuffle is a much simpler design than the bigger iPods, and apparently does not support this. In my experience, the iPod shuffle is generally mounted as a volume whenever it is connected. It also seems that iTunes requires the iPod shuffle to be mounted in order to synchronize it. iTunes will automatically unmount it after synchronization if disk use is disabled, but temporarily mount it again each time it needs to resynchronize it later.
    And now it's working. The iPod shuffle NO LONGER mounts on the desktop. Exactly the way it should be with my settings.
    I'm afraid that you may be mistaken. Please try the following:
    - Quit iTunes.
    - Open a Finder window (with the sidebar showing the volumes).
    - Now connect your iPod shuffle and wait about 10 seconds.
    - The iPod volume should appear in the side bar (and on the desktop).
    - The iPod shuffle's LED will be blinking yellow because it is mounted.
    - Now start iTunes, which will synchronize the iPod.
    - Afterwards the iPod volume will disappear.
    - At this time the iPod shuffle's LED will turn to steady yellow or green.
    - Arrange windows so that you see both iTunes and the Finder window.
    - Select the iPod shuffle in iTunes under Devices.
    - Change anything, e.g. drag one song to a different position.
    - This will cause iTunes to synchronize the iPod shuffle again.
    - While this happens the iPod volume will temporarily reappear.

  • KDE 4.7: very slow and high disk usage

    Since upgrade to KDE 4.7 on my i686 laptop, my system behaves weirdly. I noticed a slow down caused by a very high disk usage: when the HDD spins the cpu usage reported by the CPU monitor plasmoid is very high (~ 50%), while top reports a very small CPU load. Another strange symptom is that, when I try to close the session, the system freezes for about 15 seconds before the logout/shutdown/restart dialog window appears, again with HDD spinning furiously. If I exit the dialog window and then try to close session again it works smoothly, so I think some caching is at work at second try.
    This is very painful since it slows down my workflow. Since now I tried to:
    - disable nepomuk, strigi and all that using the nepomukcontroller plasmoid
    - disable compositing
    - delete .kde folder
    - uninstall and reinstall all kde packages
    without any benefit. On the same laptop I have dual boot with a 64 bit arch installation, which does not have the same problem, nor has it my 64 bit desktop pc.
    Does anyone have similar issues? I don't understand what is it that makes the HDD spin so much, nor how to eventually track it down (are there som HDD usage profiling utilities?). Moreover, why top and CPU usage plasmoid report so different CPU usage stats?
    I'm very confused, so any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Although I'm not having any of the issues as Snack, I have found KDE 4.7.0 to be a very horrible release. In fact, I'm sick and tired of the KDE release notes bragging about killing thousands of bugs each release, when in actuality the first few revisions of each stable release are horrible. When I first upgraded, I ran into at least four really nasty bugs. Although I've worked around some of them, it left a really sour taste in my mouth. Here is what I've experienced:
    1.) With a new user or fresh install, there is no wallpaper by default, even if I install kde-wallpapers before I log in, it makes no difference.
    2.) Sometimes kwin will crash during log out.
    3.) Worse yet, if I exit a full screen game, it will more than likely crash Kwin. This is a problem on my laptop (which has intel video) and not my desktop (which has nvidia video). If I don't remember to disable desktop effects before opening a game, I may run into a problem.
    4.) Although my performance is good, it's not great. I would think a laptop with a Core i5 processor and 8GB of RAM would run faster than it is.
    I have tested XFCE for a bit, and I do like it alot. However, with XFCE I am unable to browse Samba shares, and that is a huge problem. In addition, I find KDE's applications to be much better than what ships with XFCE, but I question whether they're worth the performance hit. I really love Kate, Gwenview, Digikam, and Amarok. I know you can install those in XFCE, but they feel out of place and then my desktop pretty much becomes a mutt. Not only that, but KDE is full featured, whereas XFCE is not. It's like I have to choose between a stable desktop or a desktop with full of bugs.
    I hope that KDE 4.7.1 fixes everything, but historically it's usually the 4.x.2 release that really does the trick.

  • ZfD and ZfS on same server? Centralized monitoring of disk usage? ZfS 6.5 or 7?

    We have ZfD running on one server for approx. 600 users (Sybase db on
    NetWare 6.5).
    We use it for; WS registration, WS Inventory, Application Mgmt, NAL
    database, Imaging)
    I have a mixture of Microsoft Windows and Novell NetWare servers.
    Approximately:
    30 Microsoft Windows servers (2000 and 2003)
    10 Novell NetWare servers (NW 5.1 SP7 and NW 6.5 SP3)
    Q1: Is it feasable to have the ZfS backend running on the same server that
    hosts the ZfD backend ?
    We are trying to find a way to monitor all server for disk usage. Ideally
    we want to get a view/report of all servers (regardless of Novell or
    Microsoft) to see where each disk is at with regards to available space and
    also see historical trends for disk usage.
    Q2: Can ZfS do this for us? We are licensed to use it but so far we've
    only implemented the ZfD 6.5.2 and are quite please with the results.
    Q3: Also, since we are licensed to use the latest ZfD and ZfS, any reason
    to implement ZfS 7 instead of ZfS 6.5? We know that ZfD 7 is pretty much
    the same as ZfD 6.5.2 so we've decided to hold back on this upgrade. If we
    move forward with ZfS, I'm guessing that sticking with same version being
    used with ZfD is a good idea?
    Thanks for any answers!
    Marc

    Marc Charbonneau,
    >Q1: Is it feasable to have the ZfS backend running on the same server that
    >hosts the ZfD backend ?
    >
    >We are trying to find a way to monitor all server for disk usage. Ideally
    >we want to get a view/report of all servers (regardless of Novell or
    >Microsoft) to see where each disk is at with regards to available space and
    >also see historical trends for disk usage.
    Yes, it's very workable with both ZFD and ZFS on the same box. ZFS can
    monitor any of these features. It uses SNMP to do this on both netware and
    windows.
    >
    >Q2: Can ZfS do this for us? We are licensed to use it but so far we've
    >only implemented the ZfD 6.5.2 and are quite please with the results.
    >
    Glad to hear ZFD is working for you.
    >Q3: Also, since we are licensed to use the latest ZfD and ZfS, any reason
    >to implement ZfS 7 instead of ZfS 6.5? We know that ZfD 7 is pretty much
    >the same as ZfD 6.5.2 so we've decided to hold back on this upgrade. If we
    >move forward with ZfS, I'm guessing that sticking with same version being
    >used with ZfD is a good idea?
    Yes, although ZFS7 subscribers can run on XP, but I don't think 6.5 can.
    In a way, zfd and zfs are very separate and the patches do not have to
    match, but if you can keep it the same, than do. :)
    Hope that helps.
    Jared
    Systems Analyst at Data Technique, INC.
    jjennings at data technique dot com
    Posting with XanaNews 1.17.6.6 in WineHQ
    Check out Novell WIKI
    http://wiki.novell.com/index.php/IManager

  • ZfD and ZfS on same server? Centralized monitoring of disk usage? ZfD 6.5 or 7?

    We have ZfD running on one server for approx. 600 users (Sybase db on
    NetWare 6.5).
    We use it for; WS registration, WS Inventory, Application Mgmt, NAL
    database, Imaging)
    I have a mixture of Microsoft Windows and Novell NetWare servers.
    Approximately:
    30 Microsoft Windows servers (2000 and 2003)
    10 Novell NetWare servers (NW 5.1 SP7 and NW 6.5 SP3)
    Q1: Is it feasable to have the ZfS backend running on the same server that
    hosts the ZfD backend ?
    We are trying to find a way to monitor all server for disk usage. Ideally
    we want to get a view/report of all servers (regardless of Novell or
    Microsoft) to see where each disk is at with regards to available space and
    also see historical trends for disk usage.
    Q2: Can ZfS do this for us? We are licensed to use it but so far we've
    only implemented the ZfD 6.5.2 and are quite please with the results.
    Q3: Also, since we are licensed to use the latest ZfD and ZfS, any reason
    to implement ZfS 7 instead of ZfS 6.5? We know that ZfD 7 is pretty much
    the same as ZfD 6.5.2 so we've decided to hold back on this upgrade. If we
    move forward with ZfS, I'm guessing that sticking with same version being
    used with ZfD is a good idea?
    Thanks for any answers!
    Marc

    Marc,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
    - Check all of the other support tools and options available at
    http://support.novell.com.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://support.novell.com/forums/

  • Time Machine disk usage vs System disk usage

    Hi
    How is it possible that the disk usage on TimeMachine is higher than the one on the system disk?
    Here is output of df:
    $ df -h
    Filesystem      Size   Used  Avail Capacity   iused    ifree %iused  Mounted on
    /dev/disk0s2   931Gi  709Gi  221Gi    77% 186031324 57949418   76%   /
    /dev/disk1s2   931Gi  629Gi  302Gi    68% 164958812 79139480   68%   /Volumes/My Passport
    Since AFAIK Time Machine does not compress the backups, I'm afraid that some of the data is not
    backed up. The My Passport volume holds backups since a few months ago.
    How is this possible? Any hint would be apreciated.
    Thanks,
    Nikola

    In the sidebar of a Finder window, select the icon representing your startup volume ("Macintosh HD," unless you gave it a different name.) At the top level of the volume are folders with these names, among others:
    Applications
    Library
    System
    Enter Time Machine and select the most recent snapshot, which is behind the frontmost window. Are those folders present in the snapshot?

  • 100% disk usage windows 8.1

    dear support,
    Currently my system is displaying a 100% disk usage with the main cause being system.
    I've tried disabling the services superfetch and windows search to no avail.
    I'm currently running the windows performance toolkit in order to get more system information. Where should I upload the logfile in order for you to see what's the cause of the problem?

    Without the trace files or any information about what is shown by Resource Monitor to be using the drive there is no way to provide further suggestions.
    The one piece of advice that I can give is, if the application causing 100% disk usage is tiworker.exe, you may want to leave the system running overnight or for an extended period of time. Tiworker.exe
    cleans up the core system files following installation of updates and ultimately restores space and performance to your system.
    Brandon
    Windows Outreach Team- IT Pro
    Windows for IT Pros on TechNet

  • Distribution of Disk Usage

    This may be a very simple issue. I'm just wondering if there is some function where I can see the distribution of where my disk space is used. My hard drive is basically full (capacity 159.7 GB; available 826.9 MB; used 158.87 GB), but when I hit get info for the different folders that are directly within the "Macintosh HD" (Applications, Users, System, Library) I can only account for about 120 GB worth of disk usage so I'm a bit confused. If the discrepancy was due to the disk formatting wouldn't that be reflected in the capacity shown under the Macintosh HD info? Or is there some other usage that is hidden somehow?

    There are many folders that are normally invisible (to keep you from messing around with them unless you really know what you're doing). They aren't included in the 120GB that you can account for.
    With less than 1GB of free space on your hard drive, you are in imminent danger of losing the use of your computer, and perhaps losing some of the data you've stored on it. You need to free up an absolute minimum of 10GB of space immediately, and 15-20GB would be much better. You can indeed see exactly how the space on the drive is being used and what is taking up how much of it, but it requires software that you will need to download and install, and you would be insane to add anything to your hard drive now. After you've deleted at least 10GB of data from the drive, download, install and run DiskInventory X for a graphical and textual display of what is using your hard drive space. This will quickly show you what remains on the drive that's really large and probably shouldn't be on it.

  • High CPU and Disk usage on HP Envy TS 15 j-155nf after Windows Update

    I bought this laptop about a month ago and it worked perfectly fine until the second automatic Windows Update. The booting time got very slow and the entire system started to act laggy. Task Manager showed higher CPU usage than usual and Disk usage was sometimes up to 100% with no apps opened or running in the background. I decided to perform System Recovery using HP Recovery Manager. The laptop worked fine again after that, but then the same thing happened. After the second automatic Windows Update I'm back to a slow and laggy computer. I'm performing System Recovery again, but what can I do to prevent that from happening ?

    Hi,
    There are few things you can check:
    i) Check if you have more than one anti-virus installed..Check for Trial versions.If there is any then uninstall it.
    (Sometimes it could be that you have an anti-virus and windows defender or security essentials is also installed)
    ii) Next try a Clean Boot and check if it makes a difference. If clean boot fixes the issue then it has to be one of the application on the startup which is slowing it down..
    How to perform a clean boot
    iii) Run HP Support Assitant and check if there are any pending updates..
    Note:
    If you have HP Support Assistant installed on the computer(The Blue Question Mark) then open it ==> Complete all pending Updates & Tuneups==> Restart and Check. It may solve your problem
    Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.
    **Click on “Kudos” Star if you think this reply helped** Or Mark it as "Solved" if issue got fixed.

  • After I upgraded to Yosemite iphoto can't recognize my backup CDs which were created in iLife09. Ihave the original applications install disk and my old hard drive(I upgraded  to SSD). How do I get a n iphoto back to read by old CDs?

    After I upgraded to Yosemite,iPhoto can't recognize my backup CDs created in iLife 09. The applications install disk won't install iphoto because iphoto 9.5 is already installed..I updated to a SSD and have the original Hard Drive with an updated iphoto which recognized the older CDs(thanks to iphoto expander). I thought that the iphoto that transferred with the new hard drive was the same as what was on the old one. I guess it wasn't. I really need to access my backups.   HELP

    Later version of iPhoto write to the library on opening, and so cannot open libraries on optical media, as that cannot be written to. Further, optical media is going e way of the floppy disk. Therefore, you need to use a different form of archiving and back up going forward.
    To allow iPhoto to open these libraries you need to copy them to your Mac or an attached external disk.
    To merge them into an existing Library will require that you use either Aperture (if you have it) or iPhoto Library Manager.

  • Warranty Void query(High Impotence) AND DISK USAGE 100% NEED HELP!!!

    I Have an HP Dv6 pavillion 7011tx. after i upgraded this laptop to windows 8, i observed that the disk usage (in task manager) always shows 100% activity..had an Clean boot, tried all the disk checks and management things . rebooted th pc again with windows 8 but still the problem continues..
    i dont think there is any solution to this problem as i have seen many many more other posts similar to this problem
    COMING TO MY QUERY,
    I think that the problem is with bios config, my hardisk type is SATA  but the bios has it set to EF mode currently .
    Which has made my pc very very slow The insyde h20 bios sucks! 
    Bios utlilty doesnt has the option even to change it. Is there any solution to this problem?
    PC Configuration:
    I5 3rd gen intel processor
    6GB Ram
    600GB HDD
    CAN THIS CONFIGURATION ACHIEVE A 100% DISK USAGE EVEN IF NOTHING BIG IS RUNNING IN BACKGROUND?
    I AM THINKING TO BUY AN SOLID STATE DRIVE, i hope that it will resolve the problem as it is compatible on both the mode. I will extend my HDD with SDD!
    Can i do it myself or shall i have to go to HP CENTER.
    DOES MY WARRANTY GETS VOID IF I OPEN THE LAPTOP BACK FOR THIS ?
    REPLY ASAP (URGENT)

    Hi,
    Disk Usage 100% does not mean disk full but there is task which is doing a lot of i/o during that time (probably swap/page file). If nothing using i/o, the number should be down to 0% as shown:
    Now, I start a download, you can see both disk usage and Networks activities:
    In your case, the utility may do a lot of i/o to the swap/page file. My suggestion: stop it or BUYING MORE RAM.
    Hope this helps.
    BH
    **Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

  • High disk usage/high memory usage.

    i keep getting high memory usage and high disk usage in ps cs6.
    its slow when i open a file. how can i solve this problem.
    thank you.
    philip.

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but more than what?  More RAM is almost always better, but you haven't answered most of the questions posed here.  The answer might be different if you have 2 GB of RAM or 32 GB of RAM already.  A 9 megapixel document could get rather large with a lot of layers, but again you've neglected to give any hard info about its size.
    Regarding your video card, that's a bit of a judgment call you need to make.  For Photoshop CS6 I currently advise people to try to get a video card that gets a score of 1000 or better on this benchmark:  http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
    Video card speed will matter when you're editing those 3D components and video card VRAM will also matter, but possibly even more importantly your GeForce 320 is a bit old, and nVidia may just not be doing their best driver work for it any more. 
    Everything in general will run more smoothly with a powerful modern video card.  I like to recommend a VisionTek ATI Radeon HD 7750 - or if the computer power supply and your budget allow, the even more powerful 7850.  VisionTek does a very good job with their hardware, IMO, and it comes with a lifetime guarantee. 
    Keep in mind that if you switch from nVidia to ATI or vice versa, you should carefully sweep your system to ensure all files from the old card are removed, then visit the web site of the new card's maker and download/install their latest display driver release.
    Best of luck.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for

  • Automated post processing of PDFs

    The PDFs generated by RoboHelp are not production-ready in my opinion, because: - All bookmarks are expanded by default. Acrobat Pro does not include a feature to collapse all bookmarks at once (you can only collapse top-level bookmarks). You have to

  • Appropriate media transfer for mac app wont open o...

    Nokia media transfer application for "mac osx 10.4.11 and later" cannot be opened. My OSX 10.4.11 will not allow me to open the downloaded app. claiming I "cannot use this application with this version of MAC OS X" although it is supposedly adequate.

  • Nokia Lumia 2520

    I have the Lumia 2520 keyboard cover.  I have had to replace it within one week of purchase.  The reason for this was that some of the keys did not work.  Now the same issue is happening to the replacement.  More and more letters are not working on t

  • Regarding sales report using MC+E

    Hi all,       We are viewing sales report using T-Code MC+E. In the main screen there is a variant for the selection of period. The period we are giving there is pulling up calender year. We want it to pick Fiscal Year instead of Calender Year.      

  • BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE - Want to change the Ship-to-party at header level

    Hi I want to change the Ship-to-party at header level in the Sales Order created. I tried using the BAPI BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE  as shown below. When I run the program I get the log as Sales Order 45 saved succesfully. However, I don't find the SO ch