Assign a postable commitment item to the G/L account.

Hi Team,
Please write me procedure for "Assign a postable commitment item to the G/L account."
Thanks

Hi,
You have to go to FS00 transaction, enter the account and assign the commitment item ('Create/bank/interests' tab).
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Removing assigned budget from commitment item.

Hi.
I am facing a problem with how to restructure commitment item in our R3 system. The problem is that when the commitment item has been created in our system, person responsible chose "Not Directly Postable" option though it should have been "Directly Postable". Right after that budget has been assigned to this commitment item. I went through a number of FM documents and they all say that feature "postable"/"not postable" is not changeable to begin with and on the top of that commitment item cannot be changed once it has any kind of budget assigned to it. As I understand I need to roll back assigned budget (thank God, nothing else has been done), then delete this commitment item, then create it again. I couldn't find anything that explains how to do that. There is a Tcode FMDOCREV but it reverses the whole document and this is not an option for us as by the same document budgets have been assigned to a number of commitment items and spent from them already.
To summarize my post: I need to remove assigned budget for my commitment item (the rest seems to be easy).
Please, advise.
Thank you.
Regards,
Nazim

Hi,
Maybe you can use this work around solution:
1. create a direct postable and budgetable CI
2. in BCS derivation tool, replace the old CI with the new CI when applicable
3. in FMDERIVE, add the new CI to the applicable derivation rules
4. transfer the budget from the old CI to the new CI using FMBB.
If your FM master data is year-dependent, you have the option of use back the old CI by checking the postable indicatior for the new FY.
Regards,
Ming

Assignment of statistical equity items to the equity items

Hi Experts,
I'm new to consolidation, can anyone please explain the concept of assignment of statistical equity items to the equity items?
Why do we need to use statistical items in consolidation?
Your response would be highly appreciated.
Cheers
Samir

Hi Eugene,
Thanks for your prompt response, much appreciated.
I still have a doubt in my mind, as you have said Stat items are used to track the history in case of divestiture and other given scenerios, but can't those items are been kept and tracked via FS items? If you don't mind can you please elaborate this bit more with help of a scenerio or example.
Thanks once again..
Cheers
Samir

Carryforward commitment items of the POs

Hi,
We use PSM (Public Sector Management) for controlling budgets. Purchase orders with commitments are created and at the end of the year, commitments are carried forward to the next year.
From logistics point, I would like to know whether any report gives carryforward commitment items of the POs?
Thanks.
Munna.

Hi,
You have to change the nature of your commitment item (FMCIA) and set financial transaction to 30 for all commitment items which correspond to expenses. If you have already postings made on this CI, then it would be impossible to change it; in this case create a new one and adjust derivation rules - FMDERIVE (or defualt in G/L- FS00).
Regards,
Eli

Open Purchase order can we maintain commitment item for the year

hi
my requirement is for the year open purchase orders we need to maintain commitment item previously it was not maintain from this year we need to maintain is it posssible

Hi
If your PO has an IO or WBS or a Cost center maintained in it - Run the Program RKANBU01 in SE38 and it will push all the past data of commitments into the CO objects
You need to activate Commitment management in OKKP as well as in IO Type... If IO was created w/o the tick ON, then I believe you dont have a choice here..
br, Ajay M

How to delete delivery Line item after the Invoice Passed accounting

Hi Experts,
                Outbound delivery was created w.r.t. Purchase order using VL10B.In the current process here batch is determined at delivery level.There was a line item with '0' Quantity which had a batch and another line item with Full Quantity confirmed for a batch and the PGI was done for the delivery.Invoice was created and passed accounting.
                 The problem is that in VF04 in the Billing due list we are able to see the '0' Quantity Line item as shipped but not yet billed.
                 Doing a PGR ,then delete the line item with '0' Quantity and then again doing PGI was suggested by few people but i feel that will be a very tediuos process since the document passed accounting.
                  Can anyone help in getting the line item deleted from the delivery document or suggest with ways to remove the data at VF04.
Warm Regards,
Jeff

I think you can comeplete the item by using T.code VL_COMPLETE, check and let us know your feedback

Incorrect Commitment item derived for GR/IR for service orders

Hi Guys
We are currently on support pack 14, release 200 of EA-PS. I'm experiencing problems in with FM account assignment derivation. Especially with regards to service entry sheets.
The system is deriving account assignments well from goods reciepts to invoice reciept stage. The problem kicks in when clearing GR/IR - clearing using transaction code MR11. The system derives the expenditure commitment item using the GR/IR account in FI. I created assignments for my commitment items to be derived from G/L accounts as there is a one to one relationship between my G/L account and commitment item.
This condition results in a debit and credit entry being posted to the same commitment item in one transaction. I would expect only one item to be posted to the expense commitment item as it is the only one in the two line document whose financial transaction field set to 30. The GR/IR commitment's financial field is set to 40.
Regards
Thuso Mudau.

Hi,
First thing I's do is to activate the FMDERIVE trace and see what is this commitment item derived from.
See what GL accounts are posted in the financial doc, and have a look at the log to see if the commitment item is derived directly from those acocunts.
Let me know the results...
Shahaf Yaari

Assignment of Commitment items to G/L Accounts

Hi to All,
My name is samad farooq , currently we are have upgrade our system from version 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
In 4.6C, we maintained assignment of G/L Accounts to Commitment Item via transaction code FS00.
Now same has been maintained in ECC6.0 but it gives error no commitment item found for processing.
We can maintain using the derivation strategy (FMDERIVE), but as we have upgraded, is there any way to automatically system derive the commitment without mention all the data again by using the derivation strategy.
Thanking you all in Advance.
Samad Farooq

Hello,
commitment items are essential for the update into the Project Cash Management as the financial transaction which is maintained for the commitment items is used to identify the type of the posting (e.g. invoice, payment, etc). Further informations about the correct customizing of commitment items can be found in note 144169.
The assignment of commitment items to the value categories is similar to the assignment of cost elements or cost element groups to value categories and is needed for the proper update of the data from the Project Cash Management into the Project Information Database (table RPSCO). The Project Information Database is the basis for hierarchy reports. So in case that this customizing isn't done, values from the Project Cash Management might not be shown or might be shown incorrectly in the hierarchy reports (e.g. 31CASH, 31FIM, 31FIMA, 31FIMB).
Assigning one commitment item to all value categories can be done. It is depending how detailed your reporting should be, but from point of the reporting it won't make sense to mix for example commitment items for outgoing payments with commitment items for incoming payments.
Kind regards,
Dirk

BW 7.0 - Extraction of the FM derivation rule gl_account - commitment item

Hello,
I need to load in BW the FI-FM tables of the derivation rules between GL account and commitment item.
The particularity of these tables is that their name is client-dependant.
Example: the table name in development system is: totoDEV; in production system: totoPROD.
I created a specific datasource based on table SKA1 and added the commitment item in the extraction structure .
Now, I have to write the function EXIT_SAPLRSAP_002. I know I need to use a variable for the table name but I don't know how to do that, because I can not declare the production table in development system. I need some abap help!!
Great thanks in advance.
Jacques

Hi,
I can think of three possibilities for a solution.
1. Store the name of the required table in a config table and select at runtime
2. use an 'IF' or 'CASE' statement to deterimine which system you are currently in and then place the required varible within this statement.
3. Preferred solution: use a Field Symbol to assign the table at run-time, this way no errors will occur and your program will compile.
There are many examples of FIELD SYMBOLS on SDN and even the F1 help in SAP.
regards,
CH

Doesn't allow us to change the commitment item in ME21N/ME22N

Hi,
We have prepared Po for Stock transfer Order by using Item Category I, without PR. While making Po we have two line items... 1st line item the material is DMFRL1023 (Raw Material) & 2nd line item is DMFRC1051 (Raw Material). In Material DMFRL1023 itu2019s allowing to change the Commitment Item but in 2nd line item it doesnu2019t allow to change the commitment item. The Valuation Class & VC: Sales order stk in both materials is same. The Gl which is attached in BSX transaction key in obyc is XXXXXX. And the same GL appears when we do the entry in new po against two materials because we have created Commitment item same no as GL which is non budgetable. But in Material DMFRL1023 it give us to change & for Material DMFRC1051 it doesnu2019t allow us to change the commitment item. If we changed that it will take previous commitment item (Default one). There is no purchase Order history against both line item
Kindly advice.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Nikhil

Hi Nikhil,
The way that commitment items are derived by transaction FMDERIVE can be the answer for your inquiry.
I will explain to you in detail how to use the trace tool.
Normally the derivation strategies are called at posting time several times. Please turn the trace of FMDERIVE On, as explained in SAP note 666322 (download the note in service marketplace). If you enter in transaction FMDERIVE you will see the trace button (a truck) were you click on activate.
This is a customer tool where you can analyze the derivation log and find out how the Account Assignment objects are determined (values after and before the derivation process).
Please do the following:
a. Enter in FMDERIVE and activate the Trace
b. Test again your issue in ME21N/ME22N.
c. You will receive FMDERIVE trace screen with the values of account assignments. Probably you will receive more than one time this screen. If you see that the value is correct go to the next step clicking on button "X".
Whenever you find that the value is incorrect (or empty), please do the following:
d. In the FMDERIVE pop-up screen click on button "Display Log". When you click there you will see another screen.
e. There, Go to Menu Goto -> Display Print Template
f. Click on both folders to open the tree.
In the first one you will see the Values after and Before.
In the second one (Steps), you are able to see WHERE exactly was the change, what was happening during the execution of derivation rules, the RULES that it is in use in that step.
All the derivation rules which are in use during the process will be marked with yellow line.
If you check the trace log and the 'value after' is not correct, you should adjust your existing derivation rule.
If you find out that a derivation rule is responsible for the different behaviour on commitment item changes in MM transactions, I suggest you to find out the derivation rule and then adjust the target field settings.
For this, please enter in the derivation rule -> Definition Tab, double click in the name of your Target Field (bottom part of the screen).
There you will find the fields:
( ) Do not overwrite if Fld Already Filled
( ) Overwrite with new value
( ) Overwrite with new value if new value is not empty.
You should choose the most appropriate option for your business scenario.
I hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Commitment item error at the time of Service entry Sheet

Hi experts,
I have created a service PO, in which I have given the GL. Now when I am going to post the service entry sheet, I am changing the GL account. But system is picking the commitment item with reference to the GL earlier provided in PO.
I want to pick the commitment item with reference to the GL I am providing in service entry sheet.
Pl suggest how can I achieve this.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Hi Eli,
Thanx for your response.
But derivation rule is same for all GL. Whether we put GL in PO or in Service entry sheet, system will derive the commitment item from the same single rule.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Message no. FMKU135, The commitment item category is not correct

Dear experts,
I'm trying to chek how budget release works in BCS. When I run transaction FMMPRELE, the message in the title appears.
The commitment items in the message log are with category "3" - expenditure. What can be wrong with that?
If you have any idea, please share.
Thanks in advance,
Toni

Hi
any update on this? I also got the same error. What should I do?
Thanks

No Budget allocated But System shows expenses againt the Commitment Item.

We are able to post Items against a Commitment Item inspite the Budget being zero. How do we prevent this from happning ?
Lalchand.R

Try activating availability control - KO30 - internal order; CJBV - Projects
Cheers.

No commitment item entered in item 00002 SCL 270303

Hi,
I had implemented Funds Management.All configuration is done.Now when im posting a FI entry system is neither giving any budget exceed message nor recognisisng Second line items Commitment .
Basically sytem is not recognising commitment items for the the GL which are assigned to Dummy commitments.
below is the error.
Help if anybody is having any input
No commitment item entered in item 00002 SCL 270303
Message no. FI311
Diagnosis
The posted document contains at least one company code in which Funds Management, Cash Budget Management, or Project Cash Management is active. Therefore you must enter a commitment item in all involved company codes.
Procedure
Enter a commitment item.
If you cannot enter a commitment item, check with your system administrator that your account assignment derivation is adjusted so that the system can automatically derive a commitment item from another account assignment, or from the G/L or cost element

Hi Deepa
Suppose when you post a document rs 5000 and you post the budget on that GL 4000, then system not post the document and give the errro Budget is exceed something.
In that case you check in SPRO -Public sector management -Fund management goverment -Actual & commitment update - integration - Active& deactive fund management
Here you check out fund management is active or deactive.If deactive then system not given the message budget exceddand not update the budget report.
2. No commitment item entered in item 00002 SCL 270303
in that case check the derivation rule Fmderiver transaction code , here you see you assign GL to commitment item
B) you go to the transaction code FMBSBO - Budget adddress - here you assign commitment item to fund center
then also go to FMBSPO - Payment address - here alos you assign the commitment item to fund center
Kindly revert in case of any query
Regards
Roobal

BADI For Commitment Item Change for Service PO

Hi All,
I want to change the commitment item in the PR on change of Material Group . I used the BADI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST for changing the commitment item and its working fine for all types of PR except Service PR .
In service PR , its changing the commitment item only on clicking the Account Assigment button because at this instant only the BADI is getting trigger .
I want to change the commitment item without clicking the Account Assigment button (on pressing enter or at saving time ) .
Is there any way ?
Thanks
Manik L Dhakate

We are using User Exit MEREQ  EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_010
In our PR creation for ME51n, we are validating the Person through HR Org structure at the Point of Key in his Cost Center, whether he belong to his Department cost center, we use this User Exit MEREQ  EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_010. If he doesnu2019t not belong, the message pop up as u201C Please use your department cost centeru201D. This works very good in case of NB Document Type (Non stock & Materials).
We have customized ZCPR (Service PRs), but for service PRs, the place where we enter Account Assignment is Different screen, either it is planned or unplanned service, the system take you to another separate screen to key in Cost Center & GL, here the validation is not happening,
Please suggest & advice us, we tried in this BADI : ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST, we can fix it. Any User Exit or BADI for Service PRu2019

Assign a postable commitment item to the G/L account.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for