ATP - One Checking group for several checking rules (Trans. OPJJ)

Hello,
In my system, each control group is associated to several checking rules. So, I don't understand how the system choose the right rule to use.
IIs it normal use ? SAP Documentation and forum threads seems to speak always about one checking rule for one checking group.
Thanks for your help,
Emmanuel
Edited by: Kholargol on Oct 2, 2009 11:19 AM

Emmanuel,
Just to add to what Prasobh explained on how to use different check rule 01/02 at production order level there are other checking rules that apply to SD module which is more important for defining ATP stratgey for various finished products.
So a simple sales oder for made to stock product may have checking rule A that considers existing unrestricted stock, purchase orders, production orders  dates to promise against.
However a MTO sale order for made to order(MTO) product may have a check rule AE that  should consider only the relevant production order and /or replenshipment lead time to promise against.
So while checking group set at material master needs many check rules specific to various Sale orders, production orders, plant mainteneance orders, or project orders.
Hope this helps in your understanding of this concept.
Thanks,
Ram

Similar Messages

  • No control data maintained for checking group ZI and checking rule A

    Dear all,
                   When i do the availability check in the sales order i got the message as  No control data maintained for checking group ZI and checking rule A and finally availability check was not carried out, I check all the configuration under the sd-availabilitycheck and i maintained in material master also..........
    Please give me the solution
    Best Regards ,
    Kumar

    Hi,
    Did u maintain the scope of availability check like incluke reqts,planned reqts, purchase requisitions, production order, sales reqts,delivery reqts etc.
    apart from that you have to put check(Tick) mark in Requirment class and scheduleline categorie
    Then u have to maintain in material master individual requirmentss or daily requirments
    checking rule like A,B or if its consignment AW if it is returnable packaging AV etc(ImgS&D-Basicfunctions-Availabiltycheck&Tor---availability check aginst ATP)
    Then Total summarized daily reqts or summarized individual requts
    Plz check above all setting then u will get clear idea.
    Regards,
    Murthy

  • Sales Order VA01 - "No control data for checking group 04 and checking rule

    Dear Gurus,
    When saving a sales order in VA01, I get the following message: "No control data for checking group 04 and checking rule A"
    Can anyone explain to me what that means?
    How can I correct this error?
    Regards
    Chris

    Check this thread
    [Re: Process Order Material availability check error|Re: Process Order Material availability check error;
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Using one packing instruction for several materials

    Dear Friends,
    I need some inputs on how to use one packing instruction for several materials.
    The scenarion here is :
    Many materials are packed in a similar way. If certain materials differ in only one characteristic (for example, construction), having to maintain a packing instruction for each of them results in a considerable time and efforts.
    Need some valuable inputs to complete this requirement.
    Regards,
    Harsh

    Hi.
    Try with reference material for packing (MARA-RMATP). Same material number must be entered on all materials which are packed through same packing instructions.
    Then you have to create/use access sequence for determination of packing instructions that contains that characteristic (RMATP).
    Best regards
    Milan

  • Check the settings for checking group 02 and checking rule BO

    Hi,
    I am doing Backorder processing for order , I am getting the error as follows,
    I have checked Checking Rule For Updating Backorders. Everything ok.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Pramod

    One Probable reason for you error.
    Check the TC: OVZ2 whether you have ticked the Block qty req. for the Checking group 02 or you have selected No checks.
    The standard setting for 02 should not have any tick..
    or _Check in the TC : se38 program : SAPLOPP3.
    Check whether you have defined the plants with the checking rule BO.
    This must be your error._
    reward points if helpful,
    regards,
    Amlan Sarkar

  • How to associate more than one security group for UCM documents?

    When checking in a document we are only able to associate one security group to documents. In our case, a particular document can be seen by more than one group e.g a document can be seen bu both finance and marketing groups.
    How can we associate more than one group for documents?
    Our requirement is related to search. We want to display the documents to the end user based on the security group that is associated with the document. We are planning to use IDM and have all the groups/roles that are possible in the end site (also delivered by same ldap) available in UCM so that when checking in the documents we can associate desired groups who can see these documents.
    Regards,
    Pratap

    One thing before all, is that I suggest that you think through your security model before implementing it in UCM. You should ask yourself questions like :
    - Is security really based on department ?
    - Why two departments need to have access to the same category of document ?
    - Is it really security that I need or classification ? Is it a problem if Accouting have access to Finance or you just don't want Marketing documents in a finance related search ?
    - Maybe what you want is that finance guys to have access to marketing document.
    Without a clear business security model, it's hard to find a UCM security model as it is impossible to associate 2 security groups to one document.

  • FCH6-allow user to chng.check info for manual check-n not for auto chekf110

    Hi Gurus....
    T'Code FCH6 will allow user to change check info if the check is created manually. But it will not allow check info to be changed if the check is generated from F110. Is there  any mean to protect check info from being changed no matter it is manual or auto check (F110)?
    FCH6 is used for bank reconcilation. user need to key in encashment date but not to allow to modify other details e.g. amount, name,....but found for manual check, it allows users to do it so...
    Is there any way to restrict the above....
    Thanks n Regards
    N Sathish Kumar

    HI,
    The way to restrict the users from changeing the data or restricted access to certain screens or fields or t-codes can be done through Authorization Objects.  Approach your Basis guy to create one for you and you assign this Auth. Object in the user roles. Provide the Basis guy with the fields that you want to restrict. I think this is the only way to restrict the access to certain fields in a screen.
    uset this link to understand more on Aurth. Objects
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/95/1632e5ba9511d29e310000e839cd96/frameset.htm
    Thanks
    VK

  • Unable to use more than one processor group for my threads in a C# app

    Hi,
    I set my .Net 4.5 (or 4.5.1) App.Config to:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <configuration>
    <runtime>
    <Thread_UseAllCpuGroups enabled="true"></Thread_UseAllCpuGroups>
    <GCCpuGroup enabled="true"></GCCpuGroup>
    <gcServer enabled="true"></gcServer>
    </runtime>
    <startup>
    <supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.5.1"/>
    </startup>
    </configuration>
    I run my app on a windows server 2012 with a NUMA architecture: 2 x [cpu Xeon E5-2697 v3 at 14 cores each with Hyper Thread activated] => 2 x 14 x 2 = 56 Logical Processors.
    This is TaskManager screenshot:
    My app start 80 threads either from "Thread Class" or "Parallel.For" and in both case it only takes 28 Logical Processors, all from the same Processor Group.
    According to MSDN documentation
    and
    Stephen Toub answer, it should use every Logical Processor of every Processor Group.
    Why does the Task scheduler assign my threads on only one Processor Group?
    I also reported this question to
    StackOverflow which have a lot more information.
    Eric Ouellet

    One thing before all, is that I suggest that you think through your security model before implementing it in UCM. You should ask yourself questions like :
    - Is security really based on department ?
    - Why two departments need to have access to the same category of document ?
    - Is it really security that I need or classification ? Is it a problem if Accouting have access to Finance or you just don't want Marketing documents in a finance related search ?
    - Maybe what you want is that finance guys to have access to marketing document.
    Without a clear business security model, it's hard to find a UCM security model as it is impossible to associate 2 security groups to one document.

  • How to set only one Index-group for a Search-iView as default?

    Hi Everybody,
    i have a lot of index ID's for searching in different folders. Is it possible to set only one index-group as default for a search iView? Until now i get all groups as default in every search. It's inconvenient for the users to use the link of 'show options' in order to uncheck the other index ID's.
    regards,
    Seed
    Edited by: seed_mopo on Jun 6, 2008 5:02 PM

    hi Seed,
    To achieve this you have to follow the below steps
    1. Create a new set of search options, choose System Administration -> System Configuration -> Knowledge Management -> Content Management -> User Interface -> Search -> Search Options Set in the portal.
    In that you have a field 'Index Groups', wherein you can specify which index group, the user has to search in. If there are multiple index groups, mention your index groups separated by comma.
    See here for more information
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cc/f4e77ddef1244380b06fee5f8b892a/content.htm
    2. You have to specify the option set that you created in step 1 in the default KM search iview. In the iview properties, under the field search option set, mention the option set that was created for this index group or multiple index groups.
    This way, you can configure KM search iview to search in a single index group or multiple index groups.
    Revert back in case of any queries
    Regards,
    Ganesh N

  • Using one plug in for several channels - How to?

    Is there a way to use for example one reverb setting for a selected group of tracks or all of the tracks globally? I'd also like to do a fade out for the entire song but am not sure how to do all the tracks at once?

    Actually, there are 2 kinds of effects. Ones inserted in the channel I think called "serial", and ones called "Parallel", which normally benefit from being on the Bus. Each is always best used in their intended manner. EQ and Compression also Gating are examples of Insert "serial" effects. They generally NEED to be inserted into the channel because they affect the entire signal, thereby changing the character of the whole signal. Inserting into a channel sends the entire signal through the effect and a purely affected signal comes out after the insert. The compressor controls dynamics, so the whole signal must be affected for this to work. If you compress at the bus, you still have your dynamic peaks coming from the direct signal and you are only compressing the portion of the signal being fed through the bus. Eqing is the same. Say you have a muddy sound and want to clear out some 250hz. Inserting the EQ into the channel will run the signal through the EQ, where you have your cleaner, less muddy sound coming out. If you ran the EQ through the bus, you would probably percieve no audible difference as the frequencies you are cutting, still remain at your original signal. The exception would be if you were to mute the channel outputs and only monitor the bus returns, then that might work, but Compressing multiple signals will not get the best out of the device. Each instrument will benefit from its own kind of settings and in the bus in this scenario, you are either compressing all or nothing. Wah, and Distortion also are far more effective when the whole signal is affected.On the other hand,Parallel processing happens when you "borrow" some of the dry, unaffected signal and send it to an effect, and the bus returns the affected signal, running parallel to your original un affected signal on a complete separate channel. Reverb is the best example of this kind of effect. Delay works very well this way too. You have a sonic advantage to leave the original dry signal unaffected (though perhaps compressed and Eqed), because from the return of the bus, you are "adding" some effect to taste, without altering your original signal. This gives a much bigger sound because for instance, with a single mono vocal track, you now have that single mono track, plus you have the effect filling in on the stereo sides. You can place the mono (or any dry) signal wherever you want in the mix, and with the bus fader, add effects in stereo to taste. It is just delightful.

  • How to create distribution rules group for wbs settlement rules

    Hi,
    How can I create distribution rules group for WBS element settlement rules ?
    For some WBS elements I can see(in view mode(cj03)) distribution groups in settlement rules screen but when I try to edit settlement rules I only see default group.
    How can i create/edit those groups ?
    Regards,
    Rafał

    Self answered:
    CJIC t-code

  • One trip number for several trips

    We want to use travel management to pay the mileage to our customer engineers who visit customer sites daily. We need to input only date, time and miles covered. I tried to use travel calendar for that but the only problem is that each line (for a day) is assigned a separate trip number while we want ONE trip number for like 20 days data. Is it possible.

    Hi
    In travel calander it will create seperate trips for each day.If you wish to create only one trip  no. against various trips you may create direct in TRIP /PR05 transaction, with the range of start date and end date of your trip.
    Then add Mileage additional receipt for each day, it will create single trip against all your receipts.
    cheers
    Mukta

  • One DPS Suscription for several Clients?

    Hello all,
    After I read many topics related to Dps Subscriptions and so on. I still have two more questions which are unclear.
    Is it possible to have different Multi-folio apps for clients using only one subscription? For example, I have one Professional DPS subscription and 3 Clients, can DPS give me customized Multi-Folio apps for each of the 3 Clients?
    The second question is related more about the payment system which Abobe uses.
    If a Client that has Multi-Folio app deployed and has one magazine edition available for download, how can the Client take payment for such Magazine/edition download even if the download of the Multi-Folio App was given for free or not? To put it in another way, does the Multi-Folio app have a payment mechanism through which the Content owners (Clients) can receive money for their magazines? What is the complete flow for this?
    Regards,
    Eugen Coman

    You can have as many as want. Besides the DPS Pro or Enterprise license cost, you will have to pay per download to Adobe and 30% of your sales to Apple.
    All multi-folio apps are capable of in app purchase and subscriptions.
    Bob

  • GRC AC v10: User Request Field (User Group for Authorisation Check)

    Good Day,
    I am wondering if anyone has had any success in pulling across the User Group in the User Access Request Form. In EUP Default View settings, this is set as visible and editable. Yet, I am not seeing the field in the AR form. I would expect to see this field in the User Details tab. That being said, I am also curious about the User System Details tab. I would think the  User Group will come across in one of these two tabs. Appreciate any insight... ~Triera

    Hi,
    The user group of the selected user would be populated in 'User System Details' tab . This field is not there is user details tab as each system can have different user group and we can have multiple systems in the request .
    Please check if the user selected in the request has a usergroup assigned in the detail datasource system.
    Best Regards,
    Aman

  • User Group for Authorization Check

    I created a user group called SYSTEM and assigned all our companies system accounts to it. Two examples of additional SYSTEM accounts I added to the SYSTEM user group are: DDIC & SAPBATCH. I did not register this group or apply any special conditions. Since doing so, several system accounts constantly become locked.
    Is it safe to delete the SYSTEM user group?
    Please assist...

    Hi
    Did you create it on SAP Service Marketplace?
    thanks and regards Martin

Maybe you are looking for