ATP Qty check when create S/O

Dear all
I met a trouble of ATP Qty check.
The case of it is there are two storage location 0001 and 0003 in plant 2001.
Material A are stored in 0001 (7pic) and 0003(5pic).
Firstly I created two S/O for 0001 : S/O.1 for 5pic and S/O.2 for 2pic. (both ok)
Then I move 3pic from 0001 to 0003 by MB1B and MBSU.
Now in 0001 the unrestricted use of Material A is 4pic but sales order is 7pic.
Then I create S/O for 0003 : S/O.3 for 5pic (save ok).
but when I continue to create S/O for 0003 : S/O.4 for 3pic (failed)
The system told me there is no ATP qty.
But according to CO09, there is still 3pic for ATP in 0003.
Can anyone tell me why?
Is the Atp check based on the whole plant level but not storage location level?
How to prevent the case?

Dear Slam Yang
Can you tell us you are maintaining storage location in sales order?
In OVZ3 you will find checking group is at Material type and plant level, can you tell us what it is maintained daily requirement or Individual requirement.
and what are the settings maintained in OVZG for your requirement class( you can find it from your requirement type(OVZH), which is determined by item category + MRP Type (OVZI)
Regards
Jitesh

Similar Messages

Error in commitment check when creating maintenance orders

I'm getting an error " Error in commitment check" when creating the maintenance order for procuring the spare parts which is an non-stock item. I checked the cost for the particular Cost center/GL there is no money in that, so thatu2019s the reason for getting the error, so when we did testing in DEVL and QA, we put money into the cost center/fund/functional area and the issue has been resolved.
Now my client said they donu2019t want that control and they want to remove the commitment check so that you can create maintenance order even though you donu2019t have money on particular cost element.
FICO person told that there is no AVC check in place, also there is no budgeting control implemented, she also told that when they create Purch requisition directly they are not getting the error even though cost is not in that particular cost element but she wonder why it is giving error when we create the purchase requisition thru Maintenance order.
I have referred the experts forum to figure out this issue, but everywhere they mentioned this is due to budgeting or funds management issue and ask me to contact FICO person to remove the control, but there is no such person as current FICO person is an end user trained in SAP.
Your help is appreciated

Hi,
We got same error , while procuring through PM order , Please help us , what settings required .., Our version is 4.7EE .
The note mentioned up to level of 4.6 ,
Regards,
Sujana

Error on ATP check when Creating a Sales Order

Hello,
I encounter error on ATP check while creating a Sales Order.
The error is when I create Sales Order using material A, with or with out indicating the Plant and Storage Location, the Purchase Order quantity is returned on ATP check, but when I create an SO with out indicating the Plant and Storage Location, no PO quantity was returned. Note that we applied SAP Note # 387482 to automatically determine the Storage Location. I have also checked material maintenance in MM03 of Materials A and Material B and nothing was different, they have the same Availabity check condition.
Is it possible that the SAP note that I applied causes the error?
By the way I have noticed that when I create Material B and manually populate the Plant and Storage Location there is a pricing error(but it returns the PO during ATP check).
Thanks.
Noreen

Hello,
I encounter error on ATP check while creating a Sales Order.
The error is when I create Sales Order using material A, with or with out indicating the Plant and Storage Location, the Purchase Order quantity is returned on ATP check, but when I create an SO with out indicating the Plant and Storage Location, no PO quantity was returned. Note that we applied SAP Note # 387482 to automatically determine the Storage Location. I have also checked material maintenance in MM03 of Materials A and Material B and nothing was different, they have the same Availabity check condition.
Is it possible that the SAP note that I applied causes the error?
By the way I have noticed that when I create Material B and manually populate the Plant and Storage Location there is a pricing error(but it returns the PO during ATP check).
Thanks.
Noreen

Authorization check when creating shipment document

Dear Experts,
I have a shipment document type that is shared for all shipping point. I found that there are no shipping point checking when we select outbound deliveries. Can we add shipping point authorization check when we select delivery document?
Please advice.
Thanks.

If you want to use frameworks, I think the right model would be to place the methods in EJBs and then use security constraints and user roles and the like.
OTOH, Spring probably has something very similar without requiring EJBs. It will require the beans come from the Spring container however and not the JSF managed bean container.

GATP: Unable to check ATP (in GATP) when creating sales order in R/3

Issue:
When doing ATP check (sales order) in R/3, I am able to see only availability screen of R/3 and not APO ATP screen. In other words ATP check is performed in R/3 and not in APO (GATP).
Simulation ATP check in APO works fine.
Environment: ATP is enabled in APO, Relevant ATP categories, ATP groups and master data transferred from R/3 to APO. CIF models to transfer SO data and other master data set up.
Appreciate your inputs.

Hi Madhu,
There can be multiple reasons why it does not go to APO.
Two of the most common overlooked points are:
1. ATP tick in integration model.
2. Activation of ATP in external system: this is done in SPRO in the data transfer section.
Another common point is cheking rule: In SPRO see that your business event(SO) is enabled for ATP check.
Also you can go to transaction CO09 for ATP simulation in R/3 .
Hope it helps. Otherwise you can revert with specific questions.
Regards
Santanu Dawn

Vendor capacity check when creating PO

Hello Friends.
We have a business process situation where we would like to check Vendor capacity at time of creating PO (NB) for raw materials to ensure that we do not place POs for more than Vendor capacity.
Ideally it would be great if there is any way to check all open PO qty and compare with Vendor capacity at time of placing PO - converting PR to PO or direct PO creation.
We are in ECC 6.00.
Appreciates your comments/suggestions.
Thanks,

Thanks all for your comments but option for contract will not work in our case and here is the reason.
We want to make sure that we do not have open PO qty more than what Vendor can supply at any point of time. Business reason is sometimes there is surge in finished goods demand and MRP will create new PRs for raw materials and planners will keep converting these PRs to PO withouth knowing how much open qty already Vendor has to supply. So if we have somewhere a check point in system where it checks and warn if open PO qty is more than particular limit set somewhere for example, PIR etc.
Please comment.
Thanks in advance - vbhai

Bypass authority check when creating Ibase from BAPI

Hi,
We have a requirement to create/update an Ibase when saving a Service Order. We don't want to give users authorization to update the Ibase via PFCG.
Is there a way to bypass the standard authority check that is executed when calling CRM_ICSS_CREATE_IBASE or CRM_ICSS_CREATE_COMPONENT so that the Ibase can be updated without the user having to have the necessary athorisation object?
Is there an alternative method to create/update the Ibase that will not check authorizations?
regards
Tim

Hi,
FM CRM_IB_AUTHORITY_CHECK gets called during IBase create.
You can create implicit enhancement in this FM to bypass the authority check.

How to deactivate/ignore R/3 info records when creating Shopping Cart?

Hi all and thanks for reading...
We have the requirement of ignoring/deactivating R/3 info records when creating Shopping Carts SRM , so that no Vendor is proposed in transactions BBPSC01/BBPSC02.
At the moment, when info records exist in backed, system is proposing vendor and other data and we want them to be completely ignored, both in classic and extended classic scenarios.
How can we accomplish that? Is it possible to use BBP_SOS_BADI or is this BADI only valid for SRM local sources of supply?
Has anybody had the same problem and solved it before?
Thanks in advance for your help, regards
David

Hi David
Inforecord is only source of supply for classic scenario only.
Find and Check Sources of Supply
Use
With the Business Add-In BBP_SOS_BADI, you can search for and check sources of supply according to your own rules. These sources of supply include contracts, vendor list entries and product linkages. For this, the customer fields of the shopping cart or purchase order are transferred to the BAdI.
Standard settings
The BAdI provides the following methods:
1. BBP_SOS_INDEX_UPDATE_CHECK
Use: Check and update contract items in the source of supply table.
2. BBP_SOS_SEARCH
Use: Search for sources of supply according to your own rules.
3. BBP_SOS_CHECK
Use: Check and filter the sources of supply found by the standard search according to your own rules.
4. BBP_SOS_PD_CHECK
Use: Carrying out your own additional checks when creating a shopping cart document item with an assigned contract.
Activities
Implement the BAdI if you wish to determine or check sources of supply according to your own rules.
See also
Implementation
As prasanna mentioned - do you want disable both sides or only one side .
Muthu

How to cancel rounding value check when convert pr to po use me59n

dear all,
I have a requisition that,customer want to cancel rounding value check when converts pruchase requisition to purchase order use
t-code me59n,but they want keep the rounding value check when create purchase requisition when mrp running.i look up enhancement for this function,but didn't find any.so has any one can tell me a way to solve this question?
thanks a lot!
Edited by: p y on Aug 3, 2010 10:08 AM
Edited by: p y on Aug 3, 2010 10:10 AM
Edited by: p y on Aug 3, 2010 10:57 AM

does anyone know it?

ATP: check rule AE in place of A when creating sales document

Hello,
when creating a sales order in the sand box, the ATP check rule was "A".
when creating a sales oorder in the development box, the ATP check rule is AE.
The product, the order type, the ATP configuration are completely similar.
I red on the forum that the check rule is determined by the system without any customizing reason.
But in this case, there must be a reason explaining why the system wants us to make assembly order as we do not use PP.
So do you have any idea how this check rule is determined?
Thank you,
Yann

Man I've been trying to figure this out all day. Luckily for you there is a person here who knows more than I do and he was gracious enough to answer my questions. The long & short of it is there is no assignment you can configure or change, the Check Rule is an internal assignment (hard coded) based on the MRP and requirements settings of the material. If you are getting AE then you are using a make-to-order material. Try a different material... one that is not replenishment, consignment or make to order. If you're getting a different rule in 2 different systems with the same materials please share the MM settings of each and we can explore the differences.
This is about as deep as you can get into ATP. Good stuff!

How to realize cross-plant ATP check in 46c when creating SO

Hi all
For cross-plant ATP check is not available in 46c when creating SO, is there other way to realize it? Can it be realized through user-exit or enhancement or development?
Is there anyone can help me?
Best regards
Egg

see these user exits for VA01. Second one can be used for ATP check...
check below enhancements in SMOD Tcode .
SDAPO001 Activating Sourcing Subitem Quantity Propagation
SDTRM001 Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
V45A0002 Predefine sold-to party in sales document
V45A0003 Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
V45A0004 Copy packing proposal
V45E0001 Update the purchase order from the sales order
V45E0002 Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
V45L0001 SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
V45P0001 SD customer function for cross-company code sales
V45S0001 Update sales document from configuration
V45S0003 MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
V45S0004 Effectivity type in sales order
V45W0001 SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
V46H0001 SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
V60F0001 SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
V45A0001 Determine alternative materials for product selection
Regards,
Madan gopal Sharma..
REWARD POINTS

Wrong ATP check when modifying VA02 ( Flexible Planning)

Hello Gurus,
I encounter a problem in checking material availiabilty for client as below:
+ Firstly define the Planning for customer with MC94
For example :
material MAT1
Base unit of measure : PC ( Piece)
Unit of sale : Carton ( 1 carton = 10 PC)
(Base unit of measure for this info structure is CARTON)
M01.2010 : 3 CARTON
M02.2010: 3 CARTON
M03.2010: 4 CARTON
When creating VA02 for :
Date : 04.02.2010
Order quantity : 4
When checking the material availibity : It's OK
For M01.2010 : It take 3 CARTON
For M02.2010 : It takes 1 CARTON
But When I modify this sale order for changing the quantity to 5 CARTON, In the check ATP it displays in a wrong way with strange number and decimal places
For example:
M01.2010 : 0.02
M02.2010 : 2
How can we resolve this ? Is there any SAP notes for this ?
Thanks in advance

Hi mohan
Thank you for sparing time.
I am confused Mohan.
First of all I have one query:
1) Is it mandatory to do Transport and Shipment scheduling in APO only if we go for only Basic Methods implementation like Product Availability and Allocation in APO.
Third scenario you mentioned gave you a Sunday delivery(start of week 21) and random results in the first two scenaros can be explained by absence of scheduling.
Please see my explaination of my third scenario:
Third Scenario:
When I create sales orders today by giving Customer Requested Date with 24.05.2010.(Which is on coming Monday)
When I check in Item Availabilty :
System is proposing following Dates:
Schedule Line Date =24.05.2010
MAD Date = 22.05.2010
When i click Prod Allocation Button in Check item Availability Sceen, Confirmed Date as 23.05.2010.
The Incoming order Qty assignment for this Order is for the Week 20 2010 in APO Planning Book, where as it should be saved in Week 21 2010 in Planning Book.(We have weekly Planning Books)
In ECC , System is taking Delivery date as 24.05.2010.
If you dont mind to give your male address i can send the Screen shots.
Regards
Deva
Edited by: vdeva79 on May 20, 2010 7:49 AM
Edited by: vdeva79 on May 20, 2010 7:51 AM

How to configure ATP check for "create standard order in SD (OR type)"

first, I had check my stock, I only have ten PC
, but when I enter 100 PC in a OR order, and issue ATP check, it is carries out, why? I had set availavility check into 02 in MRP3 view

Availability check
1. Availability check is an integral part of the business process that determines if the required delivery quantity can be met on a required delivery date. For this purpose the system takes into account pre-delivery activities such as scheduling for picking or packing times and the time taken to produce or obtain the material. It also performs several background functions such as Backorder processing, rescheduling and ATP quantities.
2. Backorder processing: processing of a sales order that has not been fully confirmed or not confirmed at a certain delivery date.
3. Rescheduling: is a proposal of how u2013 confirmed quantities already assigned to a sales order can be reassigned to other sales orders that have a higher priority.
4. Available to promise (ATP): is a process of checking the available quantities of a material. The ATP quantity consists of warehouse stock + planned receipts (incoming stock) u2013 planned issues (outgoing stock). to examine stock on hand (CO09) proceed to logistics u2013 sales & distribution u2013 sales u2013 environment u2013 availability overview.
5. Replenishment lead time (RLT): is the time taken for the material to become available either internally (in house production) or externally (from a vendor). The most important things to consider during an external procurement are purchasing and MRP2 (procurement) views of MMR where the processing time for purchasing, planned delivery time and goods receipt processing time are taken into account. On the other hand internal procurement is based on in house production time (MRP 2 view) goods receipt processing time or alternatively RLT time, which is found on MRP 3 view.
6. RLT (Replenishment Lead Time) is the time taken for the material to become available. RLT is only used when doing an ATP check (Available To Promise). The value of RLT for a material is specified on material master record.
7. There are three types of availability checks u2013
Check on basis of ATP quantities.
Check against product allocation.
Check against planning.
Configuring Availability check through Checking Groups
1. The checking group + checking rule determine how the availability check is to be performed.
2. The checking group determines whether and how the system checks the stock availability and generates requirements for material planning. The checking group defines what type of requirements will be passed on i.e. summarized requirements (daily/weekly) or individual requirements for each sales order.
3. The checking rule applies to how the availability check is to be carried out at the transaction level. Note that you must define checking rules for each individual application such as for production orders for example. In Sales and Distribution, the checking rule is specified internally within the system and cannot be changed.
4. The checking rule, in conjunction with the checking group, determines the scope of the availability check for every business operation; that is, which stocks, receipts and issues are to be included in the availability check and whether the check is to be carried out with or without the replenishment lead time.
5. Briefly explaining the above u2013 checking group determines which type of requirement to be passed on to MRP whether it be individual or summarized and checking rule which is at the transaction level and can be configured independently for each application module, determines which stocks, receipts and issues to be taken into account. For performing an availability check checking group has to work in conjunction with checking rule.
6. Advantages of individual processing over summarized processing u2013
Backorder processing is possible.
You can access (MD04) order, line and schedule line individually which gives a greater control on available stock and requirements placed on stock.
The system automatically uses individual requirements in case of special stock items.
7. Required data for the Availability check to be carried out u2013
The Availability check must be switched on at the requirement class level.
The Availability check must be set at the schedule line level.
A requirements type must exist by which the requirements class can be found.
A plant must be defined in the sales order for each schedule line item (in other words plant must be defined for every material in MMR).
A checking group must be defined in the material master record in the MRP3 screen in the availability check field.
8. Configuring Availability check and defining Checking Groups u2013
Checking groups are introduced into the sales order based on the setting in the material master record.
SAP standard checking groups are 01 u2013 summarized requirements and 02 u2013 individual requirements or you can create your own by copying the standard ones.
Total sales and total deliveries columns are there to configure a checking rule to sum up requirements to post to MRP either individually or by day or week.
Block quantity required can be set if you want several users to be able to process the material simultaneously in different transactions without blocking each other.
The no check indicator is CHECKED when you DO NOT want the system to carry out ATP check.
9. Defining material block for other users u2013 the block check box is an indicator that enables you to block material master records of a particular material during the availability check and restrict other users from accessing same master record and reserve the material. If the block is not set, two users can confirm the same material at the same time for two different orders, not knowing if the stock is available or not. If you select this field, the material is blocked during the availability check and other users cannot: a) Make changes in the material master record. b) Create purchase orders for the material. C) Create orders for the material.
10. Defining default values for checking groups - Checking groups are introduced into the sales order based on the setting in the material master record.
However if there is no entry present in the material master record for the checking group, a default value can be set here, depending on material type and plant.
This default value will be used by the system depending on the material type mentioned in MMR and plant in sales order.
If an entry exists, this default value is over written by MMR.
11. Controlling Availability Check u2013 in this section, you tell the system what stock on hand and what inward and outward movements of stock it must take into account when performing the availability check in addition to whether or not to consider the replenishment lead time.
12. These settings are based on the checking group that is assigned to the material master record and the checking rule that is predefined and assigned to the sales and distribution transaction.
13. These settings carry out control both for sales order and delivery as well. This is due to the fact that you may want to include specific stock or incoming stock for the sales order, yet at the time of the delivery only include physical stock on hand waiting to be shipped.
14. It is possible to indicate to the system that you would like the availability check NOT TO CHECK the stock at the storage location level. This indicator is used to set the scope of the availability check.
15. It is used to switch off the check at storage location level. You create a reservation for a particular storage location. However, the scope of the availability check is set in such a way as to exclude the storage location. In this case, the system carries out the check at plant level only and does not take the storage location into account that is specified in the reservation.
16. Should you not want the system to automatically check RLT, you may indicate so here. RLT is the time taken for a material to become available. It is only used when doing an ATP check and is taken from MMR.
17. defining the elements in the availability check entirely depends on the business needs, but a few tips are given under u2013
When controlling the Availability check at the time of the sales order, a purchase requisition does not necessarily indicate by it is going to come into the plant.
A shipping notification on the other hand - a confirmed purchase order u2013 is a good indicator of receiving stock on a specified date.
It is always recommended not to select the shipping notifications for the delivery requirements type as you may not actually receive the stock into plant or warehouse for which you are creating a delivery.

Error when creating a user - IAM-3010183 : An error occurred while checking if a user already exists with the Common Name generated.

Error when creating a user - IAM-3010183 : An error occurred while checking if a user already exists with the Common Name generated.

in OIM 11g R2
Message was edited by: 2b3c0737-074f-48d0-a760-e24e3ed9a37c

How to inactive checking available budget when creating reservation

Dear SAP Guru,
Need your advice in how to inactive checking available budget when creating reservation under Project system and Investment management module
Many thanks in advance.
Nies

ok

ATP Qty check when create S/O

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for