Authorization control for document status

Dear All,
I want to control the status change of Documets created,
How can i achieve this, so that a perticular user /ID can change the perticular status,
I have ,
01
02,
03,
04, Rel.
05,
Do i need to put some trace anf find Objects to control...
or there is any standard method to do this..
Please guide me..
Regards
Raghu

Hi Raghu,
Here are DMS authorizatoins objects. For handle status it should be C_DRAW_STA
C_DRAD_OBJ          Create/Change/Display/Delete Object Link                         
C_DRAW_BGR          Authorization for authorization groups                         
C_DRAW_DOK          Authorization for document access                         
C_DRAW_MUP          Authorization for Markups                         
C_DRAW_STA          Authorization for document status                         
C_DRAW_TCD          Authorization for document activities                         
C_DRAW_TCS          Status-Dependent Authorizations for Documents                         
C_DRZA_TCD          Document Distribution: Authorization for Recipient Lists                         
C_DRZI_TCD          Document Distribution: Authorization for Distribution Order                         
S_ECL_CAT          ECL Viewer: Authorization Object for Stamp Categories                         
S_ECL_STP          ECL Viewer: Authorization Object for Printing with Meta Data                         
S_ECL_STP2          ECL Viewer: Authorization Object for Printing with Meta Data                         
Hope that it will help you
//Håkan

Similar Messages

  • Authorization control for "Revoke  Status Closed"

    Dear Experts,
    We are trying to restrict the authorization of business transaction u201CClosedu201D & u201CRevoke status closedu201D through authorization control for transaction COR2.
    For that I have included authorization objects- K_ORDER, K_VRGNG, I_VORG_ORD in the user profile.
    I have also added these objects in SU24 with check indicator u201CChecku201D & proposal u201CYESu201D
    Through authorization object- K_ORDER I succeeded to restrict business transaction u201CCloseu201D.
    But I am unable to restrict u201CRevoke Status Closedu201D.
    I have also tried for this with user status but through user status also I am unable to restrict u201CRevoke Status Closedu201D.
    Can anybody help me for this.
    Regards
    Vivek

    Dear ,
    You can do it through two option :
    1.Apply Screen variant -SHD0 at user level in which you can switch off menu path of TECO/REVOKE etc.
    Refer : http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/TransactionVariant-AStepbyStepGuidefor+Creation
    2.You can try User Status at Production Order level .Refer : authorization for TECO
    You can also check by User Exit : PPCO0007 (Exit when saving Production Order)
    Regards
    JH

  • Authorization control for actual price calculation

    Dear all,
    I found that there is no authorization control for actual price calculation(KSII), this means user can calculate actual price for all cost centers, even this cost center belongs to other company. Is there a way to control this?
    Thanks,
    Ben

    Hi Ben,
    By SAP standard we do not have the control.  we also have the same situation.  We are venturing in to Realisation phase and we decided to have some kind of program (development) to control this.
    Please let me know if you find some better solution
    Best Regards
    Surya

  • Authorization control for batch master

    Hello Experts,
    I have a special requirement from client on authorization control on batch master. The requirement is user should not be allowed to change the batch header details but allow to change selected characteristic values. For e.g If I have a batch A, the header values such as prod date, country of orgin etc should not be allowed to change. In classification view few characteristics only should be editable, rest all should only be displayed.
    Is there any option to do this. Either through authorization control or exits. We dont want to create a custom transaction to achieve this.
    Thanks in advance
    Prathib

    Hello
    The following document explains how to check which authorization objects are called on each transaction:
    How to analyze authorization issues in debug
    BR
    Caetano

  • MD61 -Authorization control for Version , requirements type -reg

    Hi,
    We have an issue in providing MD61 -Create Planned Independent Requirements to the users
    By standard authorization objects available , Plant level authorization control only is there
    if we have to give authorization for many users in the same plant based on teh VERSION , REQUIREMENTS TYPE  etc... is it not possible ?
    can the authorizations objects be created manually for these and assign to teh concerned user's roles ?
    please provide your thoughts
    regards,
    madhukiran.

    Dear Madhu,
    Authorization objects can be added for an individual T Code also in SU24.
    Check with your Basis consultant,Also i think its possible to give the authorization for versions as well
    as requirement type also.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Transaction authorization based on document status

    Hi,
    We need to give display only access to end users (i.e specific business roles) based on the status of the document, for e.g. if document status is IN PROCESS the end user should only be allowed to Display the document - how can this be achieved ? Helpful inputs asap plz. Thank you.
    Best Regards.

    Hi Robert,
    Thanks for the quick reply, I will go through the said changes and update the thread accordingly in a day or two. Thanks again.
    Best Regards.
    Still waiting to test the solution, will update the thread soon !
    Regards.
    Edited by: Jacob Raj on May 2, 2011 2:02 PM

  • Plant level authorization control for Internal Order

    Dear Sir,
    We create Internal Order using tcode KO01 and  being a multi plant scenario , we want to have an authorization control on Internal Order creation/change so that plant or profit-center level authorization rights can be given to the users .
    We request you to Kindly guide us about the steps to be followed for addressing such requirement .
    With thanks and Regards
    Sonia Agarwala

    Sonia-
    It can be done. You have two options.
    1. SAP security - when your security person can limit a user by plant, profit center etc using authorization objects.
    2. Validations - Here you can create a validation where you define you logic. In your logic you can restrict set of users who can access a set of fields (profit center, plant etc). If he deviates, the system can issue error messages which is maintained in validations. Use transaction GGB0 to create validations.
    Hope this helps.
    Shail

  • Authorization control for Z fields

    Hi all,
    We have appended a structure to VBAP; our requirement is to update these Z fields based on authorization control.
    Other than creating Z auth objects and checking them in our exit before updating Z fields, is there any other standard option to control updating of these Z fields.
    Regards,
    Krishna.
    SAP SD Techno Functional.

    Hi all,
    We have appended a structure to VBAP; our requirement is to update these Z fields based on authorization control.
    Other than creating Z auth objects and checking them in our exit before updating Z fields, is there any other standard option to control updating of these Z fields.
    Regards,
    Krishna.
    SAP SD Techno Functional.

  • Authorization control for cost analysis/itemization view

    Hi Experts,
    Can we control the access to cost analysis/itemization report  in CO03 by authorization control ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Most probably it may not be possible.
    moreover, Why do you want this? Cost analysis will be in display mode only. Infact it benefits the user. They can analyse and correct the master if required.
    Think once again before making control. Because, everytime people has to come to authorised person to see the cost difference, which will disturb the authorised person.
    This is my personal opinion.
    Madhava

  • Authorization Control For characteristics Maint.

    Dear All,
    My requirement is that,during material master creation/change,my user can change only certain characteristics in a class.What is the purpose of Authorization group field available in CT04.This what comes with F1 help,but I am not able to relate to it.I have assigned this authorization object in user role with relevant value,but nothing is happening.I am able to maintin all charac.
    Authorization Group for Characteristics Maintenance
    This key defines whether a user is allowed to maintain this characteristic.
    This authorization must be defined in the user master record.
    The authorization object is C_CABN_GRP.

    Dear,
    The object and values what you are taking about is to restrict the charectristucs change,,,This will not restrict value assignment in material master classification view.
    This is required for not to allow chages to that chateristics in CT04.
    If you want the material master chareostics value assignment restoction then you need to restict material master claasification maintaince view through the auth object - M_MATE_STA
    the values are as below
    A     Work scheduling
    B     Accounting
    C     Classification
    D     MRP
    E     Purchasing
    F     Production resources/tools
    G     Costing
    K     Basic data
    L     Storage
    P     Forecasting
    Q     Quality management
    S     Warehouse management
    V     Sales
    X     Plant stocks
    Z     Storage location stocks
    remove C from the value and assignthe role to user by whom you donot want the value not to be assigned
    come back if required

  • Authorization Control for Delivery Document Deletion

    Hi experts,
    I know there's way to control the deletion of Sales Document through V_VBAK_AAT and V_VBAK_VKO.
    However, how can I control the deletion of Delivery Document (in t-code VL02N)?
    Thanks in advance.
    Chin

    Hi,
    if you can't find a standard authorization object using standard tools such as SU24 and ST01 then there is a BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC with method CHANGE_FCODE_ATTRIBUTES. This method is called whenever screen is displayed and can be used to exclude menu items e.g. Delete Delivery. So you can create a custom authorization object which will be used to control access to delete function.
    Cheers

  • Authorization Control for MIGO

    Dear All,
    We are in process of controlling authorization of some users, so that they will be able to access transaction MIGO, only for posting material documents of Goods Receipt, Cancelling GRN & Posting RRD. The users should not be able to post material issue, material transfer through the transaction MIGO.
    When we changed the role assigned to the user by giving authority only for the specific trancaction code MIGO, it also allowed the users to post Goods Issue, Transfer posting through transaction MIGO, along with transaction of Goods Receipt, which is unwanted.
    We also can not control the authorization of users based on Movement Type, because, if we do it, the user will not be able to view the material documents other that Goods Issue & it will also restrict the report viewing for other movement types.
    Can anyone provide any valuable suggestions on this?
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

    Dear All,
    Thank you very much for your instant replies.
    But, still, as I mentioned, I do not want to control authorization based on Movement Type. This would prohibit the user from displaying reports.
    Any other suggestions Pl.
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

  • CJ20N Authorization Object for Project Status Changes

    Hi Gurus,
      Can any one knows the Authorization Object responsible to control the change of status for a project in the CJ20N?
      We want to control who can and who can't change the STATUS of a project independent from other changes.
    Regards
    Gustavo Balboa

    User authorization object B_USERSTAT. Before that u should define authorization key in Tcode:BS52 and assign it to User status in Tcode:OK02.
    In authorization object B_USERSTAT set ERSL=Authorization Key, so that the user can change the status of that perticular status only.
    Venkat

  • Maintain Copy Control for Document Types.

    Hi Gurus,
    My Client has two customized documents both are order Types and wants to maintain Copy control between them.
    If i see VTAA i can find either New Entries option or copy option.
    When i go for new entries option it asks me Requirements and Routines which needs to be set for this copy control and i am not aware of those.
    The Other option is Copy as but since it's customized document types so i am not getting which document should i take as refernce for copying.
    Please suggest me how to proceed.
    Thanks in Advance!!!!

    Hi
    Ideally we don't gamble with standard settings. Not only in copy control but for all other settings related to document types, conditions, movement types etc etc. If standard settings or configuration has been deleted by human error then we should restore standard settings first. May be BASIS guy can do it and if it is not possible then open some other server where these settings are there and you should do all settings manually by copying the standard ones.
    Why we recommend to always copy standard settings and make necessary changes is that standard settings are done by SAP and they have tested it thoroughly and they have hundreds of consultants who have worked on these settings. Standard settings are reliable and we can copy them without any fear of mistake. Whereas if you copy some Z settings or create new one then there are more chances of some wrong or missing settings. Logically may be it sounds not that important or useful but technically it is really fruitful to do this.
    In standard settings system copies all subsequent settings and you don't need to do those settings again and you are already aware of this fact.
    One more benefit is that you only need to change document names and in create new entry you'll have to enter all the fields one by one and you don't know which value is more appropriate for this field. It also saves time efforts and people like me always prefer to save efforts
    Thank$

  • Authorization Control for Setting TECO

    Hi PS Gurus,
    Would like to ask if there's a standard way of controlling users on the setting of TECO for PS objects? I cant find any setting in T-code PFCG that may limit setting of TECO for selected roles. Suggestions outside standard is also welcome...
    Thanks in advance.
    Joed

    Hi Abdul,
    Thanks for the answer, I have already taken that into consideration, however my problem will be assigning the Status Profiles for all existing WBS Elements (around 10,000+ WBSE's).
    The status control will solve future WBSE's but we were also asked to consider existing ones.
    Thanks again.
    Cheers,
    Joed

Maybe you are looking for

  • Motion 4 crashes

    i use motion to animate still imagines in spaces. unfortunately motion crashes permanently. i updated motion this morinig to motion 4.0.1 and still motion crashes after some position chances of a layer. the source image is pretty large, in order to p

  • Tab does not gets hilight

    hi all i have deployed few very simple OA framework pages .these pages are interlinked via tabs. but when i moved on to any of these pages for the first time from the home page the tab does not get hilight.once i reach to my pages and then click on a

  • Upgrading PCRs (Personnel Change Requests)  front end technology

    Hi All, We are currently on Netweaver 7.0  & ECC 6.0 and ESS - MSS Business Package 50.4. We are using JSP Forms on portal front for Personnel Change Requests (PCR's ) where in all the scenarios in the backend are heavily customised.  For certain sce

  • Q: Questions about iExpense / AP invoice apporval / AME. (11.5.9  & 11.5.1)

    Hi, All, I have a couple of questions about iExpense / AP invoice apporval / AME. (1) In release 11.5.10, If I set profile option [AME: installed] to No, Can iExpnese has the same behavior as the previous release? I means that I just define the appro

  • Evilwm launcher patch

    Ok so I was a big fan of evilwm during my "minimalist hunt". I still use it as my floating alternative to Ratpoison (yes, tmpwm can do wonders ) One thing that I've always hated about evilwm was the lack of any type of application launcher, all you c