Authorization issue on SHD0 transaction variant in R/3

Hi,
Can anyone help me on the below issue?
Created a transaction variant ZME31K using SHD0 on R/3 system with the base transaction ME31K.
And created a transaction ZME31K for the above transaction variant.
Created one ID which has access only to transaction ZME31K.
But when tried to create contract using ZME31K, it allows to create the contract, but ended up with message  "You are not authorized to use ME31K".
Anyone faced similar issue before? how this can be resolved? As per the busniess requirement, they can provide access only to the transaction variant for the user and they will not be assigned to ME31K.
-Thanks,

> We are doing an Upgrade assessment wherein at R/3 side, the system is being upgraded from 4.6 to ECC 6.0.
> I wanted to know the impact the Change in Transactions at R/3 side..  namely transactions..
> AS02, CT02, F-02, F-41, F-49, FB01 would have on BW.
What do you mean? I don't get your question. What impact should those transaction have on BI?
Markus

Similar Messages

  • Edit drop down list in SHD0(transaction variant)

    Hello all,
    How can we control the values displayed in drop doen list using transaction variant? i am using SHD0 to create a transaction variant and want only few values to be dispayed in drop down list instead of all the values in orignal transaction.
    Thanks
    Arjun

    As far as I konw, you can not.
    You can edit the properties (Visible/Invisible, etc ) but not restrict the values originally displayed.
    Regards

  • Can anybody tell me how to use SHD0-tRANSACTION VARIANT

    hI,
    pL.tell me the procedure to use SHD0 for co01 and CO02 T-CODES

    Dear Laxmikanth,
    Transaction variant or Screen variant does not works out for T
    code CO01 or CO02.
    As far I know you can restrict only the plant and order type ,I
    dont think you can restrict the user's to change or modify the
    BOM Components.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • SHD0 transaction variant for SM30: some FCODEs don't react

    Hi,
    I have a customizing table which contains data of kind "current settings", so it can be maintained on productiv systems without transport dialog.
    At the moment it can only be reached within the customizing (SPRO).
    it is maintained via SM30-dialog.
    Now I need to maintain it with a normal transaction cause the admin people for the table have no authority to do customizing on productiv system.
    I made a transaction variant in SHD0 for SM30. It works except on little thing:
    the functioncodes BACK, CANC, don't work.
    Any idea, how I could make them work.
    At the moment the users has to kill the mode to leave the transaction variant.
    Thanx in advance
    Hans

    Hi Atish,
    the maintainance screen ist a transaction variant of SM30. (see subject)
    I didn't develop anything on it.
    In transaction variants you can only exclude function codes, but I didn't do this.
    Thanx for your reply.
    Hans

  • SHD0 - Transaction variant

    Hi friends,
    Can anyone tell me the transaction variant for VL01N. I want to change the BATCH field to display mode. So I when I am looking for transaction variant by F4, its giving message like ' no values for this selection' . Or else can I create screen variant of my own? If I created then what next? shall I assign that variant somewhere or it will apply automatically? Generally I did for VA01 before for some fields by taking the transaction variant which starts with BUS......  So now what to do for this? Please explain me clearly?
    regards
    Rama rao

    Hi,
    Just go to "Screen Variants" tab and enter the Screen Variant as BUS2032_4480, Program as SAPMV45A and Screen as 4480.
    Regards
    SD
    Edited by: Samier Danish on Jan 7, 2008 11:51 AM

  • SHD0-Transaction Variant not correctly hiding screens from tabstrip control

    Hello All,
    I have created a transaction variant for transaction PPDPIM.  It is my intention to hide all tabs on the second screen of the transaction except for one.  This is working.  However, I find that my results are as follows:
    1. The tab I have left as visible is, in fact, visible.  All others are invisible.  This is good and what I want.
    2. For the one visible tab, the subscreen contains the structure/information found on the DEFAULT tab (which is not the same as the chosen visible tab).  This is bad.
    It would seem that somewhere in the application the default tab is being set and somehow overriding the transaction variant.  Has anyone found a solution to this type of problem?
    Thank you.

    I have used the "Invisible" checkbox on the subscreen screen variant as the only configuration.  I marked this check box for 5 of the 6 tabs with outcome as outlined in my first message.
    If I include the "default" screen (giving me two visible screens) then both screens display properly.  This does not seem consistent.
    Has anyone had a similar problem who can give me some constructive suggestions?
    Thanks

  • SHD0 -- Transaction variant for specific users

    Dear All,
    I want to change label text for VA02 using GUIXT.
    I have created Group ZGROUP1 and the transaction variant is ZGROUP1VA02. Then I have activated the variant. It is supposed to change the label for the users belong to ZGROUP1 but it is changing for all users.
    Please advice and thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Maysara Salah

    Hi after creating the group and  variant , you need to add the users in that group under user assignment tab and after entering the user name just click assign and then click set proposal.
    Note: Do not activate the variant. (If you activate it , the changes will be affected for all users)
    Thanks & Regards,
    Madhumahesh.

  • Transaction Launcher - TCode Authorization Issue for ERP transaction

    We are trying to implement an ERP transaction in the CRM WebUI via the transaction Launcher.  Everything has been set up properly and the transaction appears in the nav bar.  I am running it to launch a new window.  When i click on it, a new window pops up, with transaction IC_LTXE and an error saying
    *"You do not have authorization to view transaction ZSD_IC".*
    Everything seems to be set up properly and we can access the transaction with the same user id in ERP. He has SAP_ALL.
    Does this have anything to do with IC_LTXE?  Is there anything special i need to do to assign proper authorization to this user.
    Thanks,
    jeremy

    Hello Jeremy,
    We are trying to execute R/3 transaction from Transaction Launcher but we are facing problems.
    In order to execute transactions from TL we have copied object TSTC to ZTSTC  in both systems and use the method Execute to be used from Transaction Launcher customizing. Then we have customized T. Launcher in order to get two links, one to R3 transaction  (using the object ZTSTC, method execute and XD03 as value parameter) and one to CRM transaction (using the object ZTSTC, method execute and CRMD_MKTDS as value parameter).
    When we execute the TL link to CRM, transaction works properly through ITS, but executing the link to R3 transaction we receive the following popup message:u2018Logged Off Successfully. You have been logged off from SAP NetWeaver Application Server.u2019 the screen gets in blank and no further actions are executed.
    In order to correct the fail we have implemented these notes, but the problem still remains.
    0001224663 Launch of Front Office with Transaction Launcher fails
    0001263716 Launching Front Office Process using Transaction Launcher
    Based on your experience could you help us to get the right configuration to reach R/3 transaction through Transaction Launcher.
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Best regards.

  • SHD0 Transaction Authorization

    Hello,
    We need to deactivate certain fields in CV02N document maintenance transaction (DMS) for specific document types.
    For all other document types, all the fields of the transaction are required.
    We are using SHD0 transaction in SAP to create a new Z* transaction.
    All users need to have access to both ZCV02N and CV02N..
    However, through CV02N certain document types need to be blocked.
    Is it possible to have the authorization object assigned to a SHD0 transaction variant different from the original transaction itself?
    Is there any other approach that we can consider?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sana.

    Hi praveen,
    SHD0 is used to create and maintain Screen and Transaction Variants..
    to know more about Screen and trransaction variants click on <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/67/232037ebf1cc09e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm">this link</a>
    <b>Reward Points for useful Answers..</b>
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Transaction Variant for SHD0 in CAT2

    Hi,
       We have a requirement to default the wage type in CAT2 screen. Is it possible to accomplish this using the SHD0 transaction variant.  The wage type appears in the table control in the CAT2 screen .Kindly advice.
    Regards,
    Prabaharan.G

    Solved by Own.

  • PA30 Display Facsimiles Authorization Issue

    Dear All,
    I am facing one authorization issue in PA30 Transaction. User trying to display the archived documents from PA30 > Extras > Display All Facsimiles, when user trying to execute he is facing the below authorization issue.
    You have no authorization to display the facsimile
    Message no. PG424
    I have analyzed this issue this is lack of infotype authorization, but I am not sure which infotype we have to give under P_ORGIN authorization object. SU53 not showing anything for infotype, it is showing  ' ' in infotype.
    I checked the below SAP notes also.
    1562091 - Display all facsimiles: Incorrect Message PG424/PG425
    1990223 - HRFORMS : Can not view archived documents in PA20
    373063 - Authoriztn for applicnts opticl archv does not work
    User getting access If I maintained Star (*) or (' ') . Please help me to solve this issue.
    Thanks
    Kishore ch

    Hello,
    You can check which Infotype your archived document is linked to in table V_T585O. A user will require read authorization for that infotype as well as an authorization for S_WFAR_OBJ for the document type. If I'm not mistaken you may even need S_TCODE or P_TCODE for transaction SDV.
    Secondly, I would not advise you to rely only on SU53 data for authorization checks as it only shows the last failed authorization check. You'll get a better view on what's going on by using the system trace (ST01) or the authorization trace (STAUTHTRACE).
    It seems a bit odd to me that assigning P_ORGIN with value ' ' for INFTY would solve the problem as that is the dummy value and should match with any other INFTY value your user has. Seeing as he/she has PA30 then I assume he/she will already have an authorization for P_ORGIN. Check the settings in V_T585O for the document type. Maybe someone made a mistake there and left the Infotype cell empty instead of "-".
    Good luck
    Brent

  • Transaction Variant thru SHD0 issue

    Hi,
    We have created a Transaction Variant for VL01N --> de-activate Post Goods Issue button thru tcode SHD0.
    Now issue is that it effect of other client also.
    Means we have 3 clients on same server. and ab above requires only on single client. But if also de-activate on others.
    How can I do the same for single client.
    Please guide.

    Even though user can able to do PGI thru VL01N tcode
    If your project have a Security team and they have done this, I don't think, it is possible.  If you have authorization to SUIM, execute it, click on Roles > By Authorization Object.  There check once again for that user whether they got the authorization.  If you don't have authorization to access SUIM, then execute UST12 table through whichh also you can check.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Transaction variant issue (T-Code SHD0)

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a Transaction variant for T-Code SM30 for providing row level filter to a particular View.
    During recording when I select the radio button - "Enter Conditions" on the selection screen of sm30, it doesnt reflect in the recording. Also all the options corresponding to radio button are disabled. Let me know for further clarifications.
    Also please let me know if there is any other workaround for providing row filter to a table View.

    Hi,
    Even though question is already marked as answered, I think that Pince Kummar requirement was not fulfilled.
    Those are the steps that you should execute:
    1. Create a Selection Variant:
    In FBL1N transaction, enter your required field values, and click on the save icon. Maintain variant attributes as you need. Assign to your selection variant a name beginning with CUS&. With that prefix you specify that is a customer system variant.
    2. Assign the created selection variant as default for tcode FBL1N.
    Go to SE93 and change FBL1N, on "Start with variant" field select your created CUS& variant and save.
    At this time you can notice that FBL1N transaction always begin with your selection variant.
    3. If you also want to disable Dynamic selections function, you should create a Standard transaction variant.
    Go to SHD0, enter the transaction code name (FBL1N). In the Standard Variants tab enter a name and choose create function. Automatically FBL1N selection image will be showed, click back button to return. In the screen that now is showed, choose "Menu Functions" and enter Program "RSSYSTDB" and gui status "%_00" and click Menu Functions, then in the tree that come out, find and select Dyamic Selections function (%_00->Edit->DYNS), next click disable button and then continue button.
    Now you return to Transaction variants maintenance screen. Make sure that in deactive functions list, for Dynamic selections function is only active "For Transaction" check box. Now save and activate your transaction variant.

  • Transaction variant for Goods Issue going back to MB1A transaction screen

    Hello,
    I have created a transaction variant ZMB1A for Goods issue.
    When the goods issue transaction completed by using ZMB1A system again going back to the initial screen of MB1A. (Since it is the base of MB1A)
    Here the issue is everytime user had to enter the ZMB1A transaction. (for example if the user wants to issue material for different plants).
    Please suggest any suitable method to avoid the above multiple t code execution.
    Regards
    Rifaie M

    Hi,
    In SHD0, do the complete processing of Transaction MB1A during creation of Transaction Variant "ZMB1A" till posting of the Material document.
    To create a new T-Code as ZMB1A, go to Transaction SE93 and here enter Transaction Code as ZMB1A and Click Create button. Now enter Short text of Transaction and select option "Transaction with Variant (Variant transaction)" and press enter.
    Here enter following;
    Transaction             MB1A
    Transaction variant     ZMB1A
    Activate "Cross-client"
    Select Professional User Transaction
    Activate SAP GUI for HTML
    Activate SAP GUI for Java
    Activate SAP GUI for Windows
    Now Click SAVE button.
    Now you can start using Transaction ZMB1A which will call Transaction Variant ZMB1A.

  • Transaction variant from TCODE ME51n issue

    I am created Transaction variant Against transaction ME51N and ME52n ( two transaction variant ) we donu2019t want to give transaction me51n and me52n to users.
    But the problem is that when I revoke the transaction Me51n and me52n from users and give them to transaction variant transactions YME51N and YME52N when the user run that transaction error occur that missing authorization object S_TCODE and value ME51N same in run in transaction YME52n the required transaction is me52n. we donu2019t want to give both transactions to users please help me regarding this issue
    thanks

    Check whether you are using it right.following extract from SAP help apply.
    Transaction type: Variant transaction
    In the SAP Reference IMG, under "Basis Components" -> "Application Personalizaion" -> "Tailoring of Application Transactions",  you can define transaction variants. These allow you to preassign values to fields within a transaction, define field attributes, or hide entire screens.
    To run a transaction variant, you define a variant transaction. On the next screen, enter the name of the transaction and the name of the variant.
    If above does not work there is a brute-force alternative- a little abap can be fired whenever someone executes me52n or yme52n to go after sy-uname  and thereby call yme52n or me52n as need be!

Maybe you are looking for