Auto Goods Issue not taking place

Hii All
I hv Maintained backflush indictor in work center and in MRP2 view it is maintained as Workcenter
decides whether to backfluch .
But the auto goods issue is not taking place when the production order is saved and confirmed.
The stock remains the same ..
Can anybody tell the reason for that
Regds
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh,
what is the control key u have maintained in Routing?
if u r using Control key PP01 - Routing/Ref. op. set - internal proc., then after Production Order confirmation u have to do MB31- Goods Receipt for Order, with movement type 101.
If u r using PP03 Routing - in-house prod. auto. goods rct, then it accepts only single operation in a Routing (or) if u r having say more than one operations in a routing, then u have to give PP03 control key for the last operation.
I think u got it...
revert back if u have doubts.
Thanks & Regards,
Santosh

Similar Messages

  • Goods release is not taking place

    Dear Friends,
    i am getting error while releasing goods from plan order to production order.
    my case is as follows
    while converting pl.order to production order, goods movement is not taking place.even though when we save the entries, production order is saved with the order number.then i go for goods receipt MB31,"goods is not released" message is displaying.
    In the production order system is giving error message
    Business transaction can not be carriedout.
    system status WERC IS ACTIVE (ACT 600026850010)
    Diagnosis :
    Object Act 60002685 0010 has system status WCRE (work centre until release).According to this status transaction release opration is not allowed.
    Procedure:
    you can only carryout the requested function if this is allowed according to the status of object.
    can anybody help on this.i think some configuration is required between plant and business area.
    please guide me!

    Hi Krish,
    There is a problem with the tasklist type usage used in work center.
    Check in Basic data of the work center "usage". You can see the defination of that in customizing transaction "OP45". In your case the tasklist type is set for "Until release" (check box), this means that this work centre will give error if used in order at the time of "Releasing" the order.
    Resolution:
    Use a proper task list usage in the work center or change the existing one by removing the check box activation for "Until release".
    Regards,
    Prasobh
    Award your points if this was helpful...

  • Income tax dedcution is not taking place on medical reimbursement .

    Hi SAP-HR Experts .
    I am facing a issue that for few employees Medical Exemption for incomeTax is not taking place for few employees ,
    like upto Rs. 15000/- amount annually are exempted for Income Tax .
    a employee whose exemption is taking place /3m1 wage type generated , while for those employees for which exempted for Income Tax in not taking place /3m1 is not generating .
    IT-589 is maintained , and having amount 2MER(Medical reimbursement wage type) .
    IT-267 is also having entry for Off-cycle Payment .
    Emp X , having IT-589 , 2MER : 16,200 , for the duration of 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009
    for the month of May-2008 , He claims Rs. 1395.00 .
    He has both wage types 2MER = 1395.00 and /3m1 = 1395.00  .
    Employee X is correct case .
    Emp Y : is wrong case where tax exemption is not taking place .
    having IT-589 , 2MER : 30,600.00 , for the duration of 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009
    for the month of May-2008 , He claims Rs. 2086.00 .
    He has both wage types 2MER = 2086.00 and /3m1 is not here  .
    what is required in ordfer to correct this wrong case (Employee - Y) .
    Thanks & Regards : rajneesh

    Hi Sikinder.
    I have checked the Log of payroll both Correct case 'Emp-X' and wrong case 'Emp-Y'
    Both emps are of same department and same location .
    incase of Emp-X , Payroll-function INMED generates /3m1 wage type
    while in case of EMP-Y it is not generating .
    Why this is happening and how to correct it ?????.
    Regards : rajneesh

  • Command link / button action is not taking place if i use it in iterator.

    Hi,
    I am new to ADF, i am facing 1 issue while implementing ADF mobile browser application.
    Issue: command link / button action is not taking place if i use it in iterator. its just refreshing the page it self and displaying as no records.
    Scenario is i am populating the search results in results page from search page using iterator, i want to get the complete details in different page (results page -> details page) .
    I have tried in different ways.like
    case1:
    <tr:panelGroupLayout id="pgl2" layout="vertical" styleClass="af_m_panelBase">
    <tr:panelHeader text="#{classviewBundle.SEARCH_RESULTS}" id="ph1"/>
    <tr:iterator id="i1" value="#{bindings.SubjectVO1.collectionModel}" var="subject"
    varStatus="subIndx" rows="100">
    <tr:panelBox text="#{subject.Subject} #{subject.CatalogNbr} - #{subject.CourseTitleLong}"
    styleClass="af_m_listingPrimaryDetails" id="pb1">
    <f:facet name="toolbar"/>
    <tr:table var="ssrClass" rowBandingInterval="1" id="t1" value="#{subject.children}"
    varStatus="clsIndx" rowSelection="none"
    binding="#{SessionBean.subjectTable}" verticalGridVisible="true"
    emptyText="No Records" width="100%">
    <tr:column id="c9" sortable="false" styleClass="width:100%">
    <*tr:commandLink text="Section: #{ssrClass.ClassSection}-#{ssrClass.SsrComponentLovDescr} (#{ssrClass.ClassNbr})"*
    id="commandLink2" styleClass="af_m_listingLink"
    *action="#{pageFlowScope.BackingBean.searchaction}"></tr:commandLink>*
    //remaining code
    in this case commandlink action is not able to invoke serachaction() method
    case 2:
    <tr:commandLink text="Section: #{ssrClass.ClassSection}-#{ssrClass.SsrComponentLovDescr} (#{ssrClass.ClassNbr})"
    id="commandLink2" styleClass="af_m_listingLink"
    action="classdetails}"></tr:commandLink>
    in this case its not able to navigate to classdetails page.
    I gave correct navigation cases and rules in taskflow,but its working fine when the command link is out of iterator only.
    i tried with actionlistener too.. but no use.. please help me out of this problem .
    *Update to issue:*
    The actual issue is when i use command link/button in an table/iterator whose parent tag is another iterator then the action is not taking place.
    the structer of my code is
    < iterator1>
    #command link action1
    < iterator2>
    #command link action2
    </ iterator2>
    < /iterator1>
    #command link action1 is working but "#command link action2" is not...
    Thanks
    Shyam
    Edited by: shyam on Dec 26, 2011 5:40 PM

    Hi,
    To solve my problem I used a af:foreach instead.
    <af:forEach items="#{viewScope.DataBySubjectServiceBean.toArray}" var="text">
    <af:commandLink text="#{text.IndTextEn}" action="indicator-selected" id="cl1">
    <af:setActionListener from="#{text.IndCode}" to="#{pageFlowScope.IndicatorCodeParam}" />
    </af:commandLink>
    </af:forEach>
    By the way you need to convert the iterator to an Array using a ManagedBean.
    public Object[] toArray() {
    CollectionModel cm = (CollectionModel) getEL("#{bindings.TView1.collectionModel}");
    indicators = new Object[cm.getRowCount()];
    for(int i=0;i<cm.getRowCount();i++){
    indicators[i] = cm.getRowData(i);
    return indicators;
    public static Object getEL(String expr) {
    FacesContext fc = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
    return fc.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(fc,expr,Object.class);
    Hope that helps-
    Edited by: JuJuZ on Jan 3, 2012 12:23 AM
    Add getEL Method

  • Enhancement Section Activated but changes not taking place

    Hello Friends,
    I have been getting a dump error for FM GN_DELIVERY_CREATE_FOR_DIALOG which says that
    "spe_version" does not exist in table "LIPS".
    I found a enhancement option that commented out the perform that lead to the subroutine which has the error code.
    I have activated business function LOG_LE_INTEGRATION via SFW5 which activates among others switch LE_SFWS_SC3.
    I can see the global status of the switch as ON.
    This switch is associated with enhancement spot ES_SAPLV50S which has implemented an enhancement section in inlcude LV50LF14 lines 191 -194
    However, despite activation the changes are not taking place and i am still getting a dump error.
    I am also not able to set a break-point in the FM because the program cannot be generated
    My question is: Is successful program generation a pre-requiste for enhancement source plug-ins to be effective?
    Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Minhaj.

    Hi Minhajuddin ,
    With "enhancement spot" we have come across similar short dumps and inactivation of spots even when steps are taken as per procedure.Please check if any notes are available for the same ,since most of the time it fixed the problem.
    Regards
    Byju

  • Whether it is possible to make auto goods issue below safety stock level

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    I am implementing MRP for generating stock transfer Planned orders from a Main Mother Plant to different Plants. We have defined a Safety stock level for materials at main Plant level.
    There is a auto program available for generating auto goods issue against Purchase orders.
    System picks up Qty as long as unrestricted stock exists for the material during auto goods issue.
    System dont pick up any Qty below safety stock level (manual goods issue works below safety stock level).
    We are defining safety stock to meet sudden requirements and have time for new procurement.
    But it should allow us to do auto goods issue below safety stock level.
    Whether this is possible and what need to be done ?
    Thanks and Regards,
    R.Velmurugan.

    Hi Velmurugan,
    I don't think auto GR is a problem from safety stock. Auto Gr can be done by two ways.
    1. Control key and assigning the control key in operation(Preferably in last operation)
    2. In production scheduling profile you can do it. You have to assign the production scheduling profile in material master work scheduling view.
    Regards,
    Krishnendu.

  • Tables belongs to goods issue note

    can you plz send me the tables belongs to goods issue note, and how much stock is issued to the customer according to the sales order for a particular period.......
            if you dont understand this question <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    thanks in advance
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 28, 2008 12:41 PM

    Hi,
    What do your find in your table, <b>TNAPR</b> also you can compare the same with other clients. Feel free to revert back.
    --Ragu

  • Post Goods Issue (VL06O) - taking more time approximate 30 to 45 minutes

    Dear Sir,
    While doing post goods issue against delivery document system is taking lots of time, this issue is very very urgent can any one resolved or provide suitable solution for solving this issue.
    We creates every day approximate 160 sales order / delivery and goods issue against the same by using transaction code VL06O system is taking more time for PGI.
    Kindly provide suitable solution for the same.
    Regards,
    Vijay Sanguri

    Hi
    See Note 113048 - Collective note on delivery monitor and search notes related with performance.
    Do a trace with tcode ST05 (look for help from a basis consultant) and search the bottleneck. Search possible sources of performance problems in userexits, enhancements and so on.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Goods Issue not possible with ref to Reservation using 201 mvt type when reservation created by 311 movement type

    HI MM Folks,
    My requirement is reservation should be created with 311 movt type. When we do good issue with 201 movt type with reference to reservation
    system is throwing an error "Goods movement not possible with mvmt type 311". Due to MRP run we should create a reservation using 311 movement type but not 201 mvt type, (If we create a reservation 201 movt type, during MRP run automatically reservation quantity also taking into consideration, to avoid this we will be creating reservation as 311 movt type). Is there any enhancement to available to reach the requirement. If it is possible give me guidelines.
    your help will be highly appreciable.
    Regards
    Vinay

    Dear,
    Movement type 311 is for doing transfer posting from storage location to storage location with single step.But Movement Type 201 is to have consumption entry with respect to cost center etc...
    You are creating a reservation using 311 movement type and while posting the entry you are selecting the"Executable action in MIGO" is "A08-Transfer Posting" so system will always use the movement type used at the time of reservation only.Here you can not change.
    And more over if you process entry with 201 movement type system creates accounting documents but with movement type 311 system will not create accounting documents.
    Regards,
    Pardhu

  • Internal Order through Goods auto Goods Issue

    Hi friends
    i  create PO with acc.*** F and commitment item ,order(Internal oder) .
    vendor supplies goods i done GR through 101 . while i done GR goods automatically ISSUE to Internal Order .(contracter)
    Po qty 100
    GR qty 100
    Auto GI to Internal Order (Contracter) - 100
    now contracter return some qty - 10 to Company.
    how this 10 qty comes to SAP system and in company stock

    if u reverse or cancel GR thru MIGO; does the system automatically reverse goods issue?
    Hi sachin 
    S. when i reverse in MIGO (101) goods reverse to GI also. but the qty goes to open order stock . i want tht stock comes to in my company stock .
    how i ll come

  • Target Value check not taking place

    Hey Gurus,
    In the MIC i have maintained the target value as 8. Now i have created an inspection plan and assigned this MIC to it. The inspection lot is getting generated at the time of GR, I am going to QA32 and recording the result for the lot generated. But when i am giving a value of 6 for that particular MIC, it is accepting it and no rejection is taking place. Can anyone tell me why this is happening and is there any config missing?
    Regards,
    Abhishek

    Hi
    For the Rejection/Acceptance system will check the Specifications limits of the MIC not the target value. So maintain the Lower and Upper Specs for the MIC in QS23 and Chk in QA32. The values out of the Lower or Upper Specs will be the Rejections.
    Regards
    Brahmaji

  • Post Goods Issue Not creating COPA document

    Hi,
    When I post goods issue, it is generating accounting document, and Profit center document, but no profitability analysis document. I do not have COGS as a cost element. Could this be the issue?
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi Siva,
    Thank you. We are using costing based COPA, and COGS is getting posting during billing document creation.
    Another question. Is it required to create COGS as a cost element?
    Thanks,
    Ram
    Message was edited by:
            Ram R

  • Delta upload not taking place properly

    Hello Everyone,
    I am trying to load data from R/3 to BW.
    My data target is ODS.
    For the first infopkg i m doing "initialize delta update".
    Now i am making changes in particular field in R/3-say i am changing the name of the proj from ABC TO XYZ.
    Now I m scheduling delta infopkg.But its not displaying the change. i hv even added new record in R/3 side and then tried wid delta infopkg but its still not taking the update.
    I have defined Generic delta for my datasrc.delta specific field is "PROJID" and under settings i have checked "New status for changed records".
    plz help.

    Hi,
    The SAP help on this DS recommends these steps
    When you extract the documents for the first time, select the complete posting period.
    SAP recommend that you carry out initialization and full upload in a number of steps in order to create smaller packages. To improve the performance, select an update via the PSA. The data is extracted in accordance with the selection criteria. In this case, the posting date of the documents is used as the selection criteria.
    Initialize all future posting dates, even if the enhanced selection area does not yet contain any documents. The new documents are automatically entered by delta processing.
    Carry out delta processing at regular intervals. We recommend that large utility companies carry out delta processing on a daily basis. Only documents with closed reconciliation keys can be processed.
    Refer
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/87/c299397f3d11d5b3430050dadf08a4/frameset.htm
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    JituK

  • Material PO confirmation at supplier side (SUS) not taking place in SRM SUS Extended classic scenario

    We have configured extended classic scenario SRM with SUS, and all functions are working fine. However, at the time of PO confirmation of material item at the Supplier side (SUS), the material line item disappears when we click on the Create Confirmation button in SUS. The functionality is working fine for Service Items. The total value of PO is also displayed correctly in the Items overview section.
    Please provide some help in solving this issue.

    Hello,
    This is the correct behaviour of SUS - confirmations can only be created for service items which in turn create service entry sheets (Trx: ML81N in ECC).  And accepting the SES in ML81N will generate GR posting.
    For material items, you have to create ASN which will in turn create inbound delivery in ECC which you can post and will generate goods movement documents.
    So basically, for service items you create confirmation and for materials you create ASN.
    Regards,
    Prasanna

  • Auto goods issue manufatured parts (mvt 281 Q)

    hello all
    i have approximatley 60 top level parts on my project that are set to be made in house they include thousands of materials under them, purchased and manufactured
    once the top level has had all its parts issued and it is booked into stock i wish for it to automatically issue to the project is this possible????
    currently backflush is set on the project and i confirm the activity and it issues but this is a task i dont think i need to perform is i
    can get the auto issue working
    thank you in advance
    richard
    Edited by: Riche rich on Feb 16, 2012 11:49 AM

    You can use Manufacturer Part number functionality of SAP
    you need to create manufacturer's part number and then assign it to your internalnumber
    in this way you can assign your single internal number to multiple manufacturer (supplier number)
    regards
    Anish

Maybe you are looking for