Auto Run Program not updating Settlement Rules for few WBS elements
Hi,
Addition of settlement rules for OPEX WBS.
In producion system, two jobs are running daily for generating settlement rules of WBS elements but, all WBS elements are not updating with Settlement rules.
It is becoming a problem in the Period end while doing the settlement. Currently we are updating the settlement rule manually.
We have investigated and found the following WBS element with Profile name are not updating Settlement rule.
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-J0 - HHDC01
H-N0U00ULD01-P1-D1-W2 - 000090
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U0-T1-OB - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U1-W1-ON - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U2-W1-ON - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-I0-E1 - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-I0-B1 -HHDC01
H-U1DU0204DE-EX-U0-W1-ON - HHDC01
Job Names :
ZFPD_UK_SETTLEMENT_RULE_GEN
ZFPD_NO_SETTLEMENT_RULE_GEN
Please suggest on this issue
Regards
Hi,
I suppose these are background jobs. Usually there is an issue with background jobs that are run for a custom developed program. Not sure why that happens. Even i faced this issue with a couple of jobs in my system. I have still not found out the reason as to why this happens. There might be a possibility that these projects were being processed in the foreground by some user and hence they were omitted from the run.
I would suggest you to consult your technical guys on this.
Regards,
Gokul
Similar Messages
-
Mass deletion of settlement rules for few WBS- Codes
HI All,
I just want to know that is there any possible way to delete settlement rule in mass.
We use to upload the settlement rule data through LSMW program for all the project codes.By mistake the user has excuted twicw the LSMW program and now instead od having one settlement rule now they have two settlement rule assigned to the project code. thats is the second rule is duplicated.
now the user wnats to delete those second settlement rule which got duplicated for all the WBS codes. nearly there will be 6000 records are there which got affected by this.
No entries has been posted to those WBS codes till now.
Kindly any one suugest me how to proceed further to resolve this issue.
Regards,
JobyHi,
In customization, use the strategy with "No Receiver" and then use transaction CJB1/ CJB2 to automatically generate the revise settlement rules without receiver.
Regards,
Gaurav -
Capital Project Settlement Rule for lower WBS
Hello,
At my present client, for Investment projects the client want to settle top level WBS to AUC and capitalise it. So ideally the cost from lower level WBS should flow to top WBS. I am using substitution to remove investment profile from lower WBS.My concern is how do I auto populate the settlement rule for lower WBS to top WBS. I am aware about settlement strategy and OSS note 211324 (however dont want to implement this note)
The appraoch I am looking for is using "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE' BAdI . However this BADI calls for strategy and I could not maintain the required strategy (settlement to top WBS). Is there some BADI/Function module available which can be called for updating the settlement rules on lower WBS while saving or Release ? Can I make use of exits in Substitution?
Please let me know your opinions.
Thanks
SarangThanks Virendra. I agrree the only approach is development. But I need to give inputs to my developer.
We tried with BADI "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE" but it didnt work as it calls strategy in configuration.
So I am checking for some other options for e.g "WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE" which is called during save or Fn modules K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_FILL or K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_SAVE which I can use. This is a client requirement to create AUC only at top level n all cost to be rolled up to superior WBS n then settle to AUC.
The other option I was thinking is of using exits thru substitution.
What will be the best approach?
Thanks
Sarang -
Validation for the settlement rule of a wbs element
Hi Experts,
I have a requirement that in which i have to validate the settlement rule of the wbs done through t-code cj01/cj02/cj07,cj20n.
If the settlement receiver object is an G/L account (settlement category g/l ) then i have to check that if it is an o&m project type
wbs element settling on some already mentioned G/L e.g 0001081340,0001081341, then it should through some error like settlement rule not valid etc.
I have tried cjb1/cjb2 through badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE by creating some strategy but it did not have any option for G/L
settlement reciever. Also client will not agree to this as they want to create settlement rule manually.
I have also tried the exit 'EXIT_SAPLCOI1_027 ' but its not getting triggerred during settlement rules assign mentand also i think it will not solve my purpose.
Please help me as i am struck in this for long time now.
Warm Regards,
HariomHi Prabhu ,
thanks for the quick update.
I have tried many badi's and exits but they are not triggering at the saving time of the wbs.
badi :
PROJECTDEF_UPDATE
WBS_FIELDS_FOR_ASSET
WBS_USER_FIELDS_F4
WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE
WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE
exits :
EXIT_SAPLCJWB_004
EXIT_SAPLCJWB_005
EXIT_SAPLCJWB_001
These above exits i have tried either they are not implemented or they are not triggered during saving of a wbs element.
please suggest any exit or badi's which you may have used.
Thanks and regards,
Hariom -
Create Settlement rule for L2 WBS via CJB1/2
Hi Everyone
In the past we have settled WBS elements to either PSG/CCtr/AUC. We now want to have WBS hierarchies where the lower level WBS element will settle up to the superior (Level 1) WBS element.
I have configured the following items in EEC 6.0:
Created new Allocation Structure (Z4), this is a copy of WBS settlement to PSG, changed the reciever catergory to WBS element
Created new settlement profile (Z00005) with allocation Structure Z4
In the settlement strategy have added the new settlement profile with the following settings:
Account assignment element - Active
Settlement Profile - Z00005
AAt Assugn Cat.- 5 (Superior WBS element)
N:1 SD-PS - Active
I also have the existing setting to the PSG with RA key populated.
When I execute CJB2, it states that three two records processed, no errors. However when I look at the master data, only rule is created on Level 1 WBS and not lower level.
Can anyone help?
GurpritHi Abdul
Created a new one - only the L1 was updated with a SETC. Log from CJB1 shows the following:
Project Object Strategy Bill Acct Org.c SProf. AcctAsgnCt N:1 RA Key Recipient AA fld
E0108003040000 E0108003040001 Z6 X Z00003 Profitability s X Z00006 PrfSeg assigned Old
E0108003040000 E0108003040002 Z6 X Z00005 X 0
E0108003040000 E0108003040003 Z6 X Z00005 X 0
Any thoughts? -
Settlement rule for Maintenance item
Hi All,
When i attempting to create a settlement rule Using a WBS element for Maintenance Item System showing
Error Message "No Object Status is available for MIT#1'.
Thanks & Kind RegardsSri Vas,
Is this specific to a particular WBS element or does it happen for ANY WBS element? The WBS element may not have been setup properly.Check the same WBS element directly by going to the WBS element change transaction.Also check the account assignment and status of the WBS element that Ramesh had suggested. If the WBS element has been defined properly,Try changing the settlement rule to a cost center and see if you still get this error.
Regards
Narasimhan -
Settlement rule for AUC not automatically generated
Hi Experts,
I am working on a capital project scenario where I have configured the investment profile and assigned this to the project profile. I have also configured the settlement profile and allocation structure for settlement to FXA.
On release of the WBS element the AUC is automatically created.
I have posted costs to the WBS element.
When I run settlement in test mode, using CJ88 the details show the sender as the WBS element and the reciever as the AUC, and the amount = the cost posted to the WBS element in the posting period, (as expected)
However, (now my problem)
When I run settlement in "update" mode the settlement shows 1 settlement however when I drill down to see the sender or reciever details are blank. There are alno no accouting documents and a settlement rule does not display for the WBS element. There are no error messages even though the settlement has not taken effect.
Please can anyone advise on the possible cause of this error. One further point the document type on the settlement profile is configured as "SA" GL Account Document.
Thanks in advance.
Ianhi,
Go to Settlement rule (CJ02),where enter the WBS .here go to Extra in the menu bar of that WBS ,under Asset under construction ckeck the box of Historiy....something like that .
Regards
Ricky -
Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera
Hi,
When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
Yes/No
1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
Error when processing Production order
Error when processing Production order
Message no. V1380
Diagnosis
A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the following meanings:
1 = External block, 2 = General error, 3 = Insufficient data for the interface, 4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued. Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
"Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
We are using the requierement class with below details:
Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
Settlement profile contain:
Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
Let me know if you need any further details.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ADIDear SAP PP Consultant ,
What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ? -
Settlement rule for Asset Under Construction not automatically generated.
Hi Experts,
I am working on a capital project scenario where in i configured the SAP IM and SAP PS module. i am able to create AUC at the WBS level on project release,but i am not able to generate the settlement rule for AUC automatically.
Please suggest as to what i am missing to generate settlement rule for AUC automatically.
Thanks,
shivi think for automatically AUC to be generated, u need to create investment profile in OITA in that u have to tick mange AUC in investment measure. & select settlement for summary settlement.
This investment profile u need to specify in Project Profile OPSA.
do this setting & let me know whts happen?
ok best of luck.
Regards,
ANSAR -
Creation of settlement rules for WBS element
Hi,
Iam having problem when creating the settlement rules for WBS elements. The business goes like this.
We have XI interface which creates the Idocs and an inbound program(customized) to process the Idocs. When the Inbound program is run the WBS elements are created and settlement rules are created for the WBS elements. The inbound program is run automatically thru batch job.
First time when the Idocs are processed about 95% of the WBS elements have settlement rules created and for other 5% settlement rules are not created. The Idoc is in status 64. I tried reprocessing the Idoc and then the settlement rules are getting created succussfully. The problem is Iam not able to find why the Inbound program is not processing succusfully when its run first time but works when reprocessed.
I appreciate if anyone can send their views.
Best Regards
SKHi!
You might set the processing to check not only once the relevant IDocs, but more times...
Check out these programs, and set them into a batch job periodically...
RBDMANI2
RBDAPP01
Regards
Tamá -
Create new settlement rule for an order with a function module
Hi,
I would like to create a settlement rule for an order. I searched for existing function modules and found K_ORDER_SETTLEMENT_RULE, which seems to be the correct one.
The problem: The settlement rules, which I create with this function module are not saved.
Do I have to call another function module to save my new rules?
Thanks in advance,
FabianHi,
Settlement rules are first of all defined in customizing how the should be behave and secondly lies the question how to update a CO cost object with this settlement rule.
My first advice would be to use the "automatic settlement derivation feature" that can be setup in customizing alike. <b>SPRO -> Controlling -> Internal Orders -> Actual Postings -> Settlement -> Automatic generation of Settlement Rule</b>. Read the docu for this node (right click and choose Display documentation) to understand what possibilities and limitations this functionality has. Below this node you have the possibility to define a "settlement strategy" and allocate this to a order type. You can also define a Enhamcement (COOM0003
) where you can somewhat influence the automatic generation of settlement rules.
Execute transaction KO8G (collective processing) or KO88 (indicidual processing) to create a settlement rule for internal orders.
The other option you have is to create a custom program based on BDC to create settlement rule for internal orders.
I think the BDC program would be a better idea for you.
Let me know if you have any question.
Regards,
RS -
Settlement rule for Network activity
hi,
in my project, settlement rule of network activity is automatic to the superior WBS.. however i noticed that the default settlement rule is FUL.. is it possible to make setting such that the default settlement rule would still be to the superior WBS but it is PER (periodic settlement insted of full)
how to do this?
thanks in advance.see OSS note 317871
Summary
Symptom
When you create a network or a new network activity, the respective settlement rules can be generated automatically by default. In the standard system, default rule PS1 is currently supported for this. This default rule creates a settlement rule for the full settlement.
A default rule for the generation of a settlement rule for periodic settlement does currently not exist.
Additional key words
CN21, settlement rule
Cause and prerequisites
At present, the function is not supported in the standard system.
Solution
The attached program creates a corresponding new default rule PS2 which generates a periodic rule. In Customizing, you can assign this default rule to the affected network types afterwards.
It is planned to include this default rule in a future release in the standard system.
Source code corrections
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 18.06.2007 07:57:36
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Advance development
Primary Component: PS-COS-PER Automatic and Periodic Allocations
Secondary Components: PS-COS-PER-SE Settlement
Affected Releases
Software
Component Release From
Release To
Release And
subsequent
SAP_APPL 40 40B 40B
SAP_APPL 45 45B 45B
SAP_APPL 46 46B 46B
SAP_APPL 46C 46C 46C
SAP_APPL 470 470 470 X
SAP_APPL 500 500 500
SAP_APPL 600 600 600 -
Settlement Rule for Internal Order
Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.Hi:
Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards -
Dear SAP gurus,
In AIAB, I have assigned the settlement rule for AUC asset id. However I am not able to see the settlement rule assigned in As03. Is there any reportHi,
you can see the settlement rule only in AIAB.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Jun 15, 2010 12:52 PM -
Automatic Generation of Settlement Rules for PM order
Hi All,
I am doing a maintenance orders settlement and I have the fallowing issue:
My client has 2 types of equipment, namely vehicles and industrial equipment. Both have particular rules.
For vehicles, we need to control all cost by an internal order
Industrial equipment costs will be control by cost center.
So, cost center is maintained for industrial equipment, and Settlement Order for vehicle equipment.
I have a unique order type for which in Settlement profile I have entered Order and Cost Center as 'Settlement Optional' and default object type as CTR.
When I create a PM order for vehicle, system cannot generate automatically the settlement rule, because in order type I have entered default object type as CTR and in equipment I just have the Settlement Order.
But if I create a PM order for industrial equipment system create automatically the settlement rule, because cost center is maintained for industrial equipment and order type has default object type as CTR.
In the allocation structure I have a receiver category for CTR and ORD.
So, Could you help me how to generate automatically settlement rule for both cases without 2 order types?
Thanks & regards,
Hélder Nuneshi
i think it is not possible to generate settlement rule based on equipment ,if you have specified the default settlement category in IMG ,it will be generated .
check with your technical team whether user exit IWO10027 can be mapped
regards
thyagarajan
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am having a problem w/ my Itunes working correctly, after accidentally running Itunes through my troubleshooter to, Run Programs Made For PreviousVersions of Windows. It keeps popping up that the Compatibility Version is on, to make sure it's of
-
Custom Quartz Filter In Preview Not Showing Up
In Snow Leopard, I could create a custom ColorSync profile to reduce PDF size (but not with quite as a dramatic drop in quality as the default PDF Reduce File Size) and it would show up in Preview as an option. Now, in Lion, I still have the profiles
-
SRM-SUS Scenerio Replicating company code and suppliers to SUS via XI
We have configured SRM-SUS scenario. We have SRM and SUS on the same system but different clients. We have configured extended classic scenario. We are on SRM 2007 with SP5 Issue: When I execute transaction BBP_SP_COMP_INI I get no errors. I chec
-
Why is the typeface for text so thin and faint, expecially for Facebook?
Also, the kerning for the text is skewed. So some letters e.g. ll, appeared "stuck" to each other.
-
Repeating keyboard characters problem
Discussion got archived before I solved it. I have installed a Macally keyboard & solved my problem after 2 successive Apple keyboards demonstrated same issues. This matches with other users solutions to the problem. Apple - you need to come clean or