AVIS selection parameter - wrong result  in VL31N list

Hello!
I crete inbound delivery from VL31N using order list.
Default selection parameter is "AVIS".
Result list for delivery creation contains partialy delivered orders with "delivery completed" indicator is set.
When I try to create delivery for these lines I recive an error.
How could I exclude partialy processed orders with "delivery completed" indicator from list?
Thank you for help.
Andrey Garshin.

Hi Prasad,
You have not following standard coding guidelines.
Please change following:
1. Select query should not be with SELECT ENDSELECT.. remove ENdselect.. retrieve all the data into internal table without endselect
select * from ekko into table itab where bedat in date and FRGKE ne 'R' .
ctr = 1.
loop at itab.
itab-sr_no1 = ctr .
ctr = ctr + 1 .
modify itab.
endloop.
2. Select query should not be inside a Loop. Instead use FOR ALL ENTRIES
if not itab[] is initial.
select * from mara
into table imara
for all entries in itab
where matnr = itab-matnr.
endif.

Similar Messages

  • SSRS 2012: How to get a "Select All" that returns NULL instead of an actual list of all values from a multi-select parameter?

    I have a multi-select parameter that can have a list of thousands of entries. In general, the user will pick a few entries from the list or "Select All". If they check "Select All", I would much prefer that I get a NULL or an empty string
    instead of a list of all values. Is there any way to do that?
    In experimenting with a work-around, I tried putting an "All" label with a null value in the list, but it is ignored (does not display in the drop-down). If I use an empty string for the value, my "All" entry does get displayed, but so
    does "Select All", which is confusing. Is there a way to suppress "Select All"?
    - Mark

    I adapted the following from a workaround posted by JNeo on 4/16/2010 at 11:14 AM at
    http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/249227/multi-value-select-all-parameter-in-reporting-services
    To get a null value instead of the full list of all values when "Select All" is chosen:
    1) Add a multi-value parameter "MyParam" that lists the values to choose.
    2) Add a DataSet "ParamCount" identical to the one used by "MyParam", except that it returns a single column named [Count] that is a COUNT(*) of the same data
    3) Add a parameter "MyParamCount", set it to hidden and internal, then set the default value to 'Get values from a query', choosing "ParamCount" for the Dataset and the one [Count] column for the Value field.
    4) Change the parameter for the main report DataSet so that instead of using [@MyParam], it uses this expression:
    =IIF(Parameters!MyParam.Count =
    Parameters!ParamCount.Value, Nothing, Join(Parameters!MyParam.Value, ","))

  • Select for update gives wrong results. Is it a bug?

    Hi,
    Select for update gives wrong results. Is it a bug?
    CREATE TABLE TaxIds
    TaxId NUMBER(6) NOT NULL,
    LocationId NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
    Status NUMBER(1)
    PARTITION BY LIST (LocationId)
    PARTITION P111 VALUES (111),
    PARTITION P222 VALUES (222),
    PARTITION P333 VALUES (333)
    ALTER TABLE TaxIds ADD ( CONSTRAINT PK_TaxIds PRIMARY KEY (TaxId));
    CREATE INDEX NI_TaxIdsStatus ON TaxIds ( NVL(Status,0) ) LOCAL;
    Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100101, 111, NULL);
    Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100102, 111, NULL);
    Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100103, 111, NULL);
    Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100104, 111, NULL);
    Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200101, 222, NULL);
    Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200102, 222, NULL);
    Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200103, 222, NULL);
    --Session_1 return TAXID=100101
    select TAXID from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
    --Session_2 waits commit
    select TAXID from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
    --Session_1
    update TAXIDS set STATUS=1 Where TaxId=100101;
    commit;
    --Session_2 return 100101 opps!?
    --Session_1 return TAXID=100102
    select TAXID, STATUS from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
    --Session_2 waits commit
    select TAXID, STATUS from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
    --Session_1
    update TAXIDS set STATUS=1 Where TaxId=100102;
    commit;
    --Session_2 return 100103                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    This is a bug. Got to be a bug.
    This should be nothing to do with indeterminate results from ROWNUM, and nothing to do with read consistency at the point of statement start time in session2., surely.
    Session 2 should never return 100101 once the lock from session 1 is released.
    The SELECT FOR UPDATE should restart and 100101 should not be selected as it does not meet the criteria of the select.
    A statement restart should ensure this.
    A number of demos highlight this.
    Firstly, recall the original observation in the original test case.
    Setup
    SQL> DROP TABLE taxids;
    Table dropped.
    SQL> 
    SQL> CREATE TABLE TaxIds
      2  (TaxId NUMBER(6) NOT NULL,
      3   LocationId NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
      4   Status NUMBER(1))
      5  PARTITION BY LIST (LocationId)
      6  (PARTITION P111 VALUES (111),
      7   PARTITION P222 VALUES (222),
      8   PARTITION P333 VALUES (333));
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> ALTER TABLE TaxIds ADD ( CONSTRAINT PK_TaxIds PRIMARY KEY (TaxId));
    Table altered.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE INDEX NI_TaxIdsStatus ON TaxIds ( NVL(Status,0) ) LOCAL;
    Index created.
    SQL>
    SQL>
    SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100101, 111, NULL);
    1 row created.
    SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100102, 111, NULL);
    1 row created.
    SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100103, 111, NULL);
    1 row created.
    SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100104, 111, NULL);
    1 row created.
    SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200101, 222, NULL);
    1 row created.
    SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200102, 222, NULL);
    1 row created.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> Original observation:
    Session1>SELECT taxid
      2  FROM   taxids
      3  WHERE  locationid    = 111
      4  AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
      5  AND    ROWNUM        = 1
      6  FOR UPDATE;
         TAXID
        100101
    Session1>
    --> Session 2 with same statement hangs until
    Session1>BEGIN
      2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
      3   COMMIT;
      4  END;
      5  /
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Session1>
    --> At which point, Session 2 returns
    Session2>SELECT taxid
      2  FROM   taxids
      3  WHERE  locationid    = 111
      4  AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
      5  AND    ROWNUM        = 1
      6  FOR UPDATE;
         TAXID
        100101
    Session2>There's no way that session 2 should have returned 100101. That is the point of FOR UPDATE. It completely reintroduces the lost UPDATE scenario.
    Secondly, what happens if we drop the index.
    Let's reset the data and drop the index:
    Session1>UPDATE taxids SET status=0 where taxid=100101;
    1 row updated.
    Session1>commit;
    Commit complete.
    Session1>drop index NI_TaxIdsStatus;
    Index dropped.
    Session1>Then try again:
    Session1>SELECT taxid
      2  FROM   taxids
      3  WHERE  locationid    = 111
      4  AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
      5  AND    ROWNUM        = 1
      6  FOR UPDATE;
         TAXID
        100101
    Session1>
    --> Session 2 hangs again until
    Session1>BEGIN
      2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
      3   COMMIT;
      4  END;
      5  /
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Session1>
    --> At which point in session 2:
    Session2>SELECT taxid
      2  FROM   taxids
      3  WHERE  locationid    = 111
      4  AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
      5  AND    ROWNUM        = 1
      6  FOR UPDATE;
         TAXID
        100102
    Session2>Proves nothing, Non-deterministic ROWNUM you say.
    Then let's reset, recreate the index and explicity ask then for row 100101.
    It should give the same result as the ROWNUM query without any doubts over the ROWNUM, etc.
    If the original behaviour was correct, session 2 should also be able to get 100101:
    Session1>SELECT taxid
      2  FROM   taxids
      3  WHERE  locationid    = 111
      4  AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
      5  AND    taxid         = 100101
      6  FOR UPDATE;
         TAXID
        100101
    Session1>
    --> same statement hangs in session 2 until
    Session1>BEGIN
      2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
      3   COMMIT;
      4  END;
      5  /
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Session1>
    --> so session 2 stops being blocked and:
    Session2>SELECT taxid
      2  FROM   taxids
      3  WHERE  locationid    = 111
      4  AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
      5  AND    taxid         = 100101
      6  FOR UPDATE;
    no rows selected
    Session2>Of course, this is how it should happen, surely?
    Just to double check, let's reintroduce ROWNUM but force the order by to show it's not about read consistency at the start of the statement - restart should prevent it.
    (reset, then)
    Session1> select t.taxid
      2   from
      3    (select taxid, rowid rd
      4      from   taxids
      5      where  locationid = 111
      6      and    nvl(status,0) = 0
      7      order by taxid) x
      8   ,  taxids t
      9   where t.rowid = x.rd
    10   and   rownum = 1
    11   for update of t.status;
         TAXID
        100101
    Session1>
    --> Yes, session 2 hangs until...
    Session1>BEGIN
      2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
      3   COMMIT;
      4  END;
      5  /
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Session1>
    --> and then
    Session2> select t.taxid
      2   from
      3    (select taxid, rowid rd
      4      from   taxids
      5      where  locationid = 111
      6      and    nvl(status,0) = 0
      7      order by taxid) x
      8   ,  taxids t
      9   where t.rowid = x.rd
    10   and   rownum = 1
    11   for update of t.status;
         TAXID
        100102
    Session2>Session 2 should never be allowed to get 100101 once the lock is released.
    This is a bug.
    The worrying thing is that I can reproduce in 9.2.0.8 and 11.2.0.2.

  • How to create own Selection Parameter for ME2M list

    Dear Sir,
    We use ME2m tcode for getting list related to Purchase Order . We have been told that we can create our own "SELECTION PARAMETER" for ths report . Kindly guide us as what steps need to be done for this pl .
    With Thanks and Regards
    Sonia Mittal

    you can also set a variant for the existing / default ME2M screen
    fill all the required entries then click on GOTO >>Variants >Save as Variant
    next time when you run T code ME2M, you can select the variant and run the t code
    hope this will help you

  • How to make new scop of list and selection parameter in ME2L or ME2M

    Hi,
      As there are many reports avaliable ,  in ME2L and ME2M  there is scope of list and selection parameter on the selection screen,  i want to know how we can create new scope of list and new selection parameter.
    regards,
    zafar

    IMG ---> Material Management ---> Purchasing ---> Reporting ---> Maintain Purchasing Lists ---> Scope of List ---> Define Scope of List

  • List.removeAll(otherList)  - wrong result

    Hi guys,
    I have 2 Lists:
    1.     carList
    2.     documentList
    *both contain the same type: car PLUS I have overloaded the hashCode and equals of car
    carList has 1106 items
    documentList has 88 items
    I would like to remove the 88 items of documentList from the carList.
    (simple math: 1106-88=1018)
    By doing this:
    (1)
    this.carList.removeAll(documentList);
    the carList.size() = 1013 (?!?!)by doing this:
    (2)
                 for (int x=carList.size()-1; x>=0; x--)
                      Car cx = (Car) carList.get(x);
                      for (int i=documentList.size()-1; i>=0; i--)
                           Car ci = (Car) documentList.get(i);
                           if (cx.equals(ci))
                                carList.remove(x);
                                documentList.remove(i);
                                break;
                 }I get 1018 (correct)
    Question: Why am I getting the wrong result in option 1? (once again, I have overloaded the hashCode and equals of car)

    I am going to guess - and it is a guess - that it is down to the way the removeAll() method works 'under the covers' so to speak. Like you, I cannot think of any reason why the results should differ given that I would expect the equals() method - which you overrode - that would be called upon most. Sorry I cannot help any further.

  • Content Search Web Part displaying wrong Results for anonymous Users.

    HI Forum Group,
    I am getting Wrong results for my content search web part. The requirement is to show the News Description for the selected news item.
    I have a catalog site which stores News like 
    News1
    News2
    News3
    as Items. and i have connected this catalog in publishing site which is anonymous. In the publishing site created one page "News.aspx"added search results webpart which shows all the news item. Added one page "Description.aspx" to show
    description to show the selected news item.
    When ever user selects any news from news.aspx page it will redirected to description.aspx with the selected item ID
    The "Description.aspx" the search results page gets the data based on the URL by QueryString parameter as shown below
    The problem is, if i multiple items to open in tabs all the items are showing the data same as the first selected item, though the article ID is different.
    Thanks
    Sithender

    Hi,
    Thank you for your feedback on how you were successful in resolving this issue.
    Your solution will benefit many other users, and we really value having you as a Microsoft customer.
    Have a nice day!
    Best Regards,
    Lisa Chen
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Bug 2679062 - Wrong results possible from multi-column INLIST - though stat

    Hi,
    The following test case is supplied in the metalink in bug no. 2871341, the base bug for this bug is 2679062.
    REPRODUCIBILITY:
    Reproduces constantly with simple test case below:
    TEST CASE:
    DROP TABLE A1
    CREATE TABLE A1 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
    REM *********** Create the second table: ***************
    DROP TABLE A2
    CREATE TABLE A2 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
    INSERT INTO A1 VALUES ('1','2');
    INSERT INTO A2 VALUES ('3','4');
    COMMIT;
    CREATE INDEX A1_X1 ON A1(X1 );
    CREATE INDEX A1_X2 ON A1(X2);
    CREATE INDEX A2_X1 ON A2(X1);
    CREATE INDEX A2_X2 ON A2(X2);
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW A_ALL AS SELECT * FROM A1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM A2;
    ANALYZE TABLE A1 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
    ANALYZE TABLE A2 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
    SELECT * FROM A_ALL;
    SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE (X1='1' AND X2='2') ;
    SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE ((X1='1' AND X2='2') OR (X1='3' AND X2='4'));
    The 2nd query returns answer while the second is not !
    The following is published in the 9.2.0.4 fixed bug list:
    " 9204 - 2679062 - Wrong results possible from multi-column INLIST "
    I have installed 9.2.0.4 patch set on a win 2000 machine Oracle and saw that the above case is actually solved but our application which has a very similar case doesn't.
    After investigating I found the following test case that fails, it reproduces only when you have index on all columns (covering index):
    drop table t1_1;
    drop table t1_2;
    create table t1_1(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
    create table t1_2(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
    create index t1_1_ix on t1_1(c1, c2, c3);
    create index t1_2_ix on t1_2(c1, c2, c3);
    create or replace view t1 as select * from t1_1 union all select * from t1_2;
    insert into t1_1 values(1, 2, 100);
    insert into t1_2 values(1, 2, 200);
    commit;
    analyze table t1_1 compute statistics;
    analyze table t1_2 compute statistics;
    prompt
    prompt #######################################
    prompt try 1 - works fine
    prompt #######################################
    prompt
    select * from t1
    where
    (c1=1)
    and
    ( (c2=2) and (c3=100)
    prompt
    prompt #######################################
    prompt try 2 - works fine
    prompt #######################################
    prompt
    select * from t1
    where
    (c1=1)
    and
    (c2=2) and (c3=200)
    prompt
    prompt #######################################
    prompt try 3 - try 1 OR try 2 does not work !
    prompt #######################################
    prompt
    select * from t1
    where
    (c1=1)
    and
    ( ( (c2=2) and (c3=100) )
    or
    ( (c2=2) and (c3=200) )
    opened a TAR and wanted to share with you.
    Tal Olier ([email protected]).

    Hi,
    The following test case is supplied in the metalink in bug no. 2871341, the base bug for this bug is 2679062.
    REPRODUCIBILITY:
    Reproduces constantly with simple test case below:
    TEST CASE:
    DROP TABLE A1
    CREATE TABLE A1 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
    REM *********** Create the second table: ***************
    DROP TABLE A2
    CREATE TABLE A2 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
    INSERT INTO A1 VALUES ('1','2');
    INSERT INTO A2 VALUES ('3','4');
    COMMIT;
    CREATE INDEX A1_X1 ON A1(X1 );
    CREATE INDEX A1_X2 ON A1(X2);
    CREATE INDEX A2_X1 ON A2(X1);
    CREATE INDEX A2_X2 ON A2(X2);
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW A_ALL AS SELECT * FROM A1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM A2;
    ANALYZE TABLE A1 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
    ANALYZE TABLE A2 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
    SELECT * FROM A_ALL;
    SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE (X1='1' AND X2='2') ;
    SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE ((X1='1' AND X2='2') OR (X1='3' AND X2='4'));
    The 2nd query returns answer while the second is not !
    The following is published in the 9.2.0.4 fixed bug list:
    " 9204 - 2679062 - Wrong results possible from multi-column INLIST "
    I have installed 9.2.0.4 patch set on a win 2000 machine Oracle and saw that the above case is actually solved but our application which has a very similar case doesn't.
    After investigating I found the following test case that fails, it reproduces only when you have index on all columns (covering index):
    drop table t1_1;
    drop table t1_2;
    create table t1_1(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
    create table t1_2(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
    create index t1_1_ix on t1_1(c1, c2, c3);
    create index t1_2_ix on t1_2(c1, c2, c3);
    create or replace view t1 as select * from t1_1 union all select * from t1_2;
    insert into t1_1 values(1, 2, 100);
    insert into t1_2 values(1, 2, 200);
    commit;
    analyze table t1_1 compute statistics;
    analyze table t1_2 compute statistics;
    prompt
    prompt #######################################
    prompt try 1 - works fine
    prompt #######################################
    prompt
    select * from t1
    where
    (c1=1)
    and
    ( (c2=2) and (c3=100)
    prompt
    prompt #######################################
    prompt try 2 - works fine
    prompt #######################################
    prompt
    select * from t1
    where
    (c1=1)
    and
    (c2=2) and (c3=200)
    prompt
    prompt #######################################
    prompt try 3 - try 1 OR try 2 does not work !
    prompt #######################################
    prompt
    select * from t1
    where
    (c1=1)
    and
    ( ( (c2=2) and (c3=100) )
    or
    ( (c2=2) and (c3=200) )
    opened a TAR and wanted to share with you.
    Tal Olier ([email protected]).

  • Simple query with like return wrong result

    Hi,
    I run simple query with like.
    If I use parameter I get wrong results.
    If I use query without parameter results are ok.
    My script:
    ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
    ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
    -- drop table abcd;
    create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
    INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
    insert into abcd values ('111222');
    SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1; -- wrong result with value 12%
    COL1
    122222
    *111222*
    select * from abcd where col1 like '12%'; -- result ok
    COL1
    122222
    I use Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    and query run in Oracle SQL Developer 3.1.07.

    Hi,
    welcome to the forum.
    When you put some code please enclose it between two lines starting with {noformat}{noformat}
    i.e.:
    {noformat}{noformat}
    SELECT ...
    {noformat}{noformat}
    You should specify exactly how you run your code.
    If I run this statement in SQL Plus:SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
    Session altered.
    SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
    Session altered.
    SQL>
    SQL> -- drop table abcd;
    SQL> create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
    1 row created.
    SQL> insert into abcd values ('111222');
    1 row created.
    SQL>
    SQL> SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1;
    SP2-0552: Bind variable "1" not declared.
    SQL>
    I got this error. So I wonder how you set value 12%
    Please specify exactly how you run your test as we cannot reproduce your problem.
    Regards.
    Al                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Wrong results after upgrading 10g database to 11.2.0.2.6

    Hi,
    Do anyone know, why the following query results are different?
    Not Working query:
    sql1:
    select col1 from tab1
    where col1 = (select '123' from dual)
    Working query:
    sql2:
    select col1 from tab1
    where col1 = '123';
    Both the sql1 and sql2 are returning same reseults in 10g database , but not in 11g.

    Pl post OS details along with sample outputs and explain plans from the the sql1 statement from the two databases. These MOS Docs may help also
    Things to Consider Before Upgrading to 11.2.0.2 to Avoid Poor Performance or Wrong Results [ID 1320966.1]
    Wrong Results on 11.2.0.2 with Function-Based Index and OR Expansion [ID 1264550.1]
    Wrong Results/No Rows for Sql Involving Functions in 11.2.0.2. [ID 1380679.1]
    HTH
    Srini

  • I can't print wirelessly using Airport Express.  I have my HP printer connected to a USB hub, and the hub to the Airport Express, but when I select the HP from the printer list, my MacBook says the printer is "off-line" - even when it is not.

    I can't print wirelessly using Airport Express.  I have my HP printer connected to a USB hub, and the hub to the Airport Express, but when I select the HP from the printer list, my MacBook says the printer is "off-line" - even when it is not.  I've tried several USB connectors, and several different ports on my USB hub; same result.  I need to have the HP connected to the hub 'cause from there it's connected to our desktop Mac.

    Hi,
    I am currently replying to this as it shows in the iChat Community.
    I have asked the Hosts to move it to Snow Leopard  (you should not lose contact with it through any email links you get)
    I also don't do Wirelss printing so I can't actaully help either.
    10:01 PM      Friday; July 29, 2011
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
     G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
     MacBookPro 2Gb( 10.6.8)
     Mac OS X (10.6.8),
    "Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

  • How to default a multi-select parameter to ALL values?

    I have a parameter that allows the user to select multiple values.  I want it to default to use ALL values (meaning basically just ignore this parameter in the SQL generated).  However, I cannot create a calculation on this since it accepts multiple values, and the calculation only supports the first value.  Is there a way to do what I need, without selecting all the values in the list (the LOV contains hundreds and hundreds of values so this is not a viable option).  I am not very experienced with Discoverer and don't know all the tricks/workarounds, so looking for expert advice.
    Thanks

    Hello
    You would have to code the parameter and condition so that it accepts the word ALL.
    For example, let's say you are working with ITEM_NUMBER and you have thousands of items. You want the user to either be able to key one or more items or access ALL items.
    You need to create a Boolean condition like this:
    ITEM_NUMBER IN :ITEM_PARAMETER
    OR
    UPPER(:ITEM_PARAMETER) = 'ALL'
    So if the user keys the word ALL or all or All or any variant of the word that will be determined as true by the condition and all items will be selected. If the user does not key ALL then the other half of the condition will be applied and the Item must be a valid item as contained in the list of all items. You can even create your parameter with a default of ALL
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • SSRS 2012 multi select parameter not working in Report Manager.

    Hello,
    I have one report with Multi select parameter. its working fine in bids, report server but I am facing some issue on report manager 2012.
    Issue is, In Multi select parameter I have Suppose 6 value a,b,c,d,e,f  after the deployment on report manager for the first time report is working fine with selecting all the value. but for the second time if my selection include either
    a or f report gives no result and check box get unselect.
    I also try on different report manager but same result.
    what can be a issue here causing problem only for two value but working fine for other value?
    Thanks,

    Hi Javed,
           The Issue is with when you click on View Report button of Report Manager for Parameters which contain CHAR(10) and CHAR(13).
    Where ever that Column is used in Report Data Set ,
    Use replace(replace(Param,char(10),''),char(13),'')  function.
    ----------------Please Mark This as Answer if it helps to solve your problem---------------------------- 

  • What is use of defining SELECTION PARAMETER in MOVEMENT TYPE

    Hi All ,
    Can u pls tell me the reason of defining SELECTION PARATEMETER in MOVEMENT TYPE.
    REGARDS
    Sandeep

    May be I couldn't explain my question well , sorry for that.
    When I define a new Movement code using T code OMJJ ( in IMG) , there is a field for SELECTION PARAMETER.
    I wanted to know the impact of this field value.
    Pavan , you are right that value is like a searching criteria but I am just wondering how can I check whether system is working as per the SELECTION PARAMETER defined for a movement type.
    For example , in movement type 101 defined selection parameter is WE101 (Open Goods Receipts) , so where I should check (in which list ) whether system is taking it as default value or not.
    I know for you people might find it a stupid question but I have no other option than u people )
    Pls let me know if my question is still not clear
    REGARDS
    SANDEEP

  • Link db results to Dropdown list and link to email

    I need to pull information from a table 'Suppliers' in an (datebase.mdb) and retrieve two items, name and email. This in itself Dreamweaver makes fairly simple. From this information I need to produce a dropdown list, again Dreamweaver makes this simple.By the way we are using the Suppliers table as 'Departments'.
    Now the real work begins and this question. Once the user selects a name on this dropdown list, I need to create a feed of the email address associated with the selected name and pass it to an email form field as a BCC. This form (email) is generated by another subroutine, so I will also have to add the necessary coding for the form to include this BCC email address if selected.
    I wish to add the new dropdown list just below the subject and as this is an optional field, the first selection should be 'optional' and do nothing if no selection is made by the user.
    I believe that the form is generated by the 'shopcustcontact' and results passed to 'shopmailform' for final processing and sending.
    I appreaciate your input this this question.

    This isn't a Design question. Please repost in the Dreamweaver forum.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Backing up and restoring to / from iCloud

    Two things: 1) Multiple backups... Please can we have the option to choose how many backups (of an iPhone) are kept on iCloud? Having just one backup isn't ideal, especially when you have it set to back up automatically. When I was using itunes I wou

  • Error message when using Spry Data set with XML

    Hi, I have what i see as a big problem, might just be me being dumm, but here we go. When I try to use the feature of spry XML Data Set and insert spry table I get error message when trying it in IE 7. There are even a problem when I use fireworks au

  • Opening a new page via "open in new tab" doesn't load new page anymore

    I have been using firefox for a long time now because I love it's option of opening in a new tab while staying on the tab I am currently using. Recently, over the last week or so, when I open a link using a new tab, the page doesn't load in the new t

  • Dynamic participant block in Human task flow

    Hi All, I am working on human task flow and got stopped on below use case. I have two participant block let say A and B. I want to assign participant A depends on flat inside task flow parameter. If Flag is Yes, then it should assign to A and on appr

  • Possible to use adf logger to log to a new file each time ?

    Hi, how to configure adf logger to write to a new log file on each run ? is this possible ? i followed this http://blogs.oracle.com/groundside/entry/adventures_in_adf_logging_part series but still missing those steps thnks