Backwards compatibility in Aperture

I am very worried about something. I found that Aperture tend to introduce a red colour cast on my 1D MKII images. I compensate for this using Levels command. Furthermore, the white balance is not accurate so I have to overcompensate.
My worry is what will happen to all the thousands of photos I have already applied settings for in Aperture when (if) Apple introduces an update to the software that fixes the white balance settings? Would all my images now be wrong due to the offset between the old white balance settings and the newly calibrated values?
Or will Aperture be intelligent enough to know that the old settings was with a prior version of Aperture and to use the old calibrated values for the old images, and the new calibrated values for images adjusted using the updated version of Aperture?
I do not want images processed today to change tomorrow due to an Aperture/CoreImage update... This is one potential pitfall of the non-destructive editing methodology.

It's certainly a valid concern. I think your idea of Aperture somehow applying values appropriate to an older version of the raw converter is an interesting one, but I don't see how it would actually work. I think it's more likely that every time the underlying raw converter changes, your images will slightly shift. I suspect that this won't be a problem for the majority of users, but a few will hate it, especially those who are trying to match an external reference.
You may find this thread relevant:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=260995&tstart=120

Similar Messages

  • My iPad 1 is now very unstable. Apps crash consistently, Mac Numbers/Pages etc incompatible with IOS 5.1 etc. There seems to be no backwards compatibility to iPad 1. Am I just supposed to throw it away? I have restored the iPOad and it has ample storage .

    My iPad 1 is very unstable. Many Apps simply crash after opening. There is ample storage available.I have restored the iPad twice now and still it is unstable.
    Is this a lack of backwards compatibility because no-one writes apps for IOS 51.1. and the original iPad anymore? not even Apple, as the documents and sheets I create on my Mac are incompatible with my iPad now.
    My naievete tells me that this is simply Apple expecting us to upgrade to later levels of hardware. If so, very disappointing for an Apple fan. Seems your App developer approvals (even your own apps) do no require compatibility with anything but IOS 6 or later.

    There are various things to make your iPad more stable. You can try deleting all apps from the multitasking bar; do a reset ie hold the power and home buttons simultaneously until the Apple logo appears; Settings > General > Reset all Settings.
    If you had the previous version of iPages (version 09) on your Mac before upgrading to Pages 5.2, your Mac should still have that version in Applications, which is still compatible with your version of Pages on your iPad.
    If you don't have that version, you can 'Export to Pages 09' which is still compatible with iOS 5.1.1.

  • An error occcurred on line 105 while executing script 'MOM Backward Compatibility Service State Monitoring Script"

    We've been getting the following error for some time now.
    An error occurred on line 105 while executing script 'MOM Backward Compatibility Service State Monitoring Script'
    Source: Microsoft VBScript runtime error
    Description: The remote server machine does not exist or is unavailable: 'GetObject'
    One or more workflows were affected by this.
    Workflow name: System.Mom.BackwardCompatibility.ServiceStateMonitoring
    Instance name: server.domain.local
    Instance ID: {INSTANCE}
    Management group: GROUP
    Unfortunately the instance in question has since been decommissioned and simply does not exist any more. 
    We're currently on a repeat count of over 350,000 and I would REALLY like to get it stopped. I've had a look at adding an override but that points to the management server rather than the instance itself.
    Does anyone have any suggestions?
    thanks in advance!

    Hi Steven,
    There are for option for us to override a monitor ot rule:
    For all objects of class:             
    Class            
    When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply to all objects in the class at which the rule or monitor is targeted.
    For a group            
    When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply only to members of the group. The rule or monitor without the override settings continues to apply to all objects in the targeted class except for those objects that are also members
    of the group used for the override.
    When you create a group, you save it to an unsealed management pack. However, an element in an unsealed management pack, such as an override, cannot reference an element in a different unsealed management pack, such as a group. If you are going to use a group
    to limit the application of an override, you must either save the group to the same unsealed management pack as the override, or you must seal the management pack that contains the group.
    For a specific object of class:             
    Class            
    When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply only to the specified object. The rule or monitor without the override settings continues to apply to all other objects in the targeted class.
    For all objects of another class            
    When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply only to objects of a class other than the targeted class. The rule or monitor without the override settings continues to apply to all objects in the targeted class.
    Did you try to override it for a specific object of class?
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Regards, Yan Li

  • Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0 does not work in FireFox 4.How do i directly convert pages to PDF??Why is that your products are not backward compatable.U people are in the IT industry and should know this.Shame on You people.learn somthing form the IE team

    While Updating to Fire Fox 4. It said Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0 is not supported.How come 3.6 supports but not 4. I believe you people have never heard of the term "Backward Compatibility" .U people will loose your customer/support base if every new version doesn't support some existing stuff.

    '''Problem Solved FINALLY !'''
    Solution:
    I just updated my '''Adobe Acrobat X Pro''' to '''Version 10.1.0'''.By the way, I have to complain, Adobe is really slow in solving this problem...
    Here is the official link for the Adobe Acrobat update.[http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5135 <click me!>http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5135<click me!>]
    After update, the extention changed from "Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0" into "Adobe Acrobat - Create PDF 1.1". And the '''"Adobe Acrobat - Create PDF 1.1" is compatiable with the firefox 4.0.1'''. A screenshot is attached as a proof.

  • InDesign Backwards Compatibility in CS5 an MAJOR issue

    I am a print designer who works in InDesign. I bought CS3 Design Premium in late summer of 2008. Shortly thereafter CS4 came out, but after just having forked out a big chunk of change, I decided against upgrading to CS4 right away. Recently I considered upgrading but then heard CS5 was coming out so I decided to postpone the upgrade and wait for the new software. I've just checked out the trial version of CS5 InDesign and after speaking with Adobe Support have come to the conclusion that I can't upgrade to CS5. Why? BACKWARDS compatibility to CS3. The previously offered export features that supplied a path for backwards compatibility via an .inx file are gone.
    I design freelance for a lot of different customers and once the design is complete, I have to deliver the InDesign file along with all associated fonts ad images to my clients. Most of my clients are still on CS3. If I upgrade to CS5 I will instantly not be able to work for 2/3 of my clients, as I will have no means by which to save a file backwards to CS3. I was informed by Adobe support that I would need to buy CS4 and CS5, as I could save my CS5 file in the IDML format and open it in CS4 and then I could save the file from CS4 as an INX file and open that is CS3. ARE THEY INSANE??? First off that requires keeping 3 version of InDesign up and running on my machine all of the time and secondly, why should I have to buy CS4 when I'm paying an additional fee to upgrade to CS5 because I didn't upgrade from CS4? This is so screwed up that it has to be an oversight---please tell me there is a patch in the works!!!
    PS- I've never posted to a forum before, so if I have broken any rules of forum etiquette or offended in any way, I offer my apologies now and if I (and the Adobe Support staff I spoke to) have overlooked something, please enlighten me!

    Cynthia Ryan Graphic wrote:
    I am all for working with better workflow practices and I understand that saving files backwards is less than ideal but Adobe needs to look at the real world uses of their software as well. I have to work with firms that aren't upgrading now--especially with the economy we are now in--and most of the items I design for them are ads-- one page- nothing too complex--really nothing fancy. I obviously wouldn't save a book or a very complex document backwards in this way, but simple things have translated just fine in the past. In the real world we hit situations like this.
    I bought my software 21 months ago and in this time Adobe has expected me to upgrade twice--I haven't even finished expensing  the initial cost of the software on my books yet. Upgrading that often just can't happen in a small firm--it's prohibitively expensive for a one man shop.
    So now from what I understand, to do this properly, I am supposed to buy the upgrade and keep both versions running on my machine and track with every client which version of the software I need to be working in. What happens when I have to add an employee? I will have to buy the CS3 version of the software in addition to the CS5 Suite because otherwise we can't work on the same files. I'm finding this frustrating.
    Your suggestion of buying CS4 from Amazon is a good one. I will look into that further.
    DISCLAIMER: I'm an Adobe stockholder. REALITY: My holdings are probably in the same proportion as the number of bits it takes to store a period character (".") on an Internet server is to the entire Internet's storage capacity. So, while I may have some self-interest here, it's not driving me to encourage you - or even all the participants on this forum - to buy more software than you want to or need to.
    If you're simply interested in test-driving a new release, you can do that with the free 30-day trials. If you run out time, you can probably figure out a way to trick out your system to get another 30-day shot.
    However, if you use the software commercially - either to train others, or to create new material or revise old material for clients or employers - you need to decide if you can continue to do this with the software versions you own, or if the commercial needs will require you to license new versions.
    Regarding "expensing the initial cost of the software on my books" If I understand the US income-tax policies, purchases under a rather modest amount can usually be expensed in the year of purchase. If, because of your accounting method or preference, you're using a longer expensing time period, you might want to reevaluate your approach. If you attribute a portion of the software cost to each project you use it on, and, in this case, in 21 months your work hasn't let you recapture the investment, they you may want to use that information to decide how to pursue more paying for the software, or decline that stream of work and forgo upgrading.
    An alternate way to evaluate the software, especially as an employer of users, is to compare the product cost vs. how many more billable hours you and your workers can complete in a given time with it and without it, and, how competitively you can bid projects, due to the product's efficiency.
    HTH
    Regards,
    Peter
    Peter Gold
    KnowHow ProServices

  • I want to install Snow Leopard Server on our MacPro (2.66) using Mac Mini Snow Leopard Server disks?  I kept getting an error for backwards compatibility.   Is this possible or do I need to purchase another copy of Snow Leopard Server?

    I want to install Snow Leopard Server on our MacPro(2.66) using Mac Mini Snow Leopard Server disks?  I kept getting an error for backwards compatibility.   Is this possible or do I need topurchase another copy of Snow Leopard Server?

    The OS disks that are shipped with a particular product
    are set up so that tey will only install on that product.
    It will install on any Mini of that exact vintage, but that
    is all.
    This is to prevent people from doing exactly what you
    are trying to do.  The license for OSX shipped with any
    is only valid for that product.  Also, Snow Leopard,
    including Server, is only permitted to be run on one
    computer at a time.  Bottom line, unlike Lion, legally
    you cannot install the same copy on multiple
    computers unless some "family pack" or site license
    is purchased.
    Yes, you need to purchase another copy.
    The copy of Snow Leopard license is here:
    http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/macosx_snowleopard.pdf

  • Specific Flash Player 10 Backward Compatibility Issue

    There's an issue with backward compatibility on Flash Player
    10 that is breaking a lot of Flash content that was created with a
    tool that I develop and sell. It is to do with the way
    globalToLocal and localToGlobal handles NaN.
    I've reported it on the bugbase at
    https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-964
    There are more details here -
    http://www.questionwriterblog.com/archives/2008/11/scrollbar_causing_content_to_disappear. html
    The impact of the bug can be seen here.
    http://www.questionwriter.com/samples/fp10problem/v1perceptions.swf
    It is a serious enough backward compatibility issue, and
    doubtless affects other content too. I'm hoping for the outcome
    that the functionality will be restored in future player releases -
    but right now, can someone give me confirmation it is on the Flash
    Player team radar?

    bump!

  • Backward Compatibility

    Hi
    Our application is composed of few data layers. The layers comunicate through interfaces.
    My manager thinks that we should maintain backward compatibility between the layers.
    So:
    There is a defined functional interface "I".
    There is a layer component "L" which provides the functionality of I.
    There is a layer component "UL" which Uses L via I.
    A new layer component "L2" is created which has greater functionality than L and which it exposes via a new interface "I2".
    All the functions of I are also provided by I2. In other words, I is a subset of I2.
    "UL" will provide to a "layer factory" a version number, and the factory will return "L" or "L2" etc.
    This means that we cannot override methods, and difficult maintaining of code as well as code duplication.
    The bennefit of this is that all the components that worked fine with the previous "L" and were not changed, are guarantied to continue working, and needn't any QA.
    What do you think? Does it worth the trouble?
    Thanks,
    Libbhy

    libbysharf wrote:
    The bennefit of this is that all the components that worked fine with the previous "L" and were not changed, are guarantied to continue working, and needn't any QA.Based on what you have stated here, this is not necessarily the case. Just having the same method signatures doesn't not mean that it will work exactly the same way. Even if the methods from L are implemented in the exact same way in L2, you could have situations where the new L2 methods change the behavior of the old L methods.
    What do you think? Does it worth the trouble?Personally, I think it seems a little over-engineered. If you just add to a class, it will not break binary compatibility with existing clients. You'd be much better off spending time creating unit tests and regression test scripts and try to verify that the behaviors from the previous verison are maintained.

  • Backward Compatibility Question

    Our ADS system is running with Basis 7.0 SAPKB70005
    Can we develop forms on systems with a lower Basis version e.g. 6.4?
    Are there backward compatibility issues?
    Regards,
    Lavaughn

    Hi Lavaughn
    it depends a bit on what you want to do.
    If you want to develop the form on the 6.40 box and then render it with the 7.0 Application Server, the answer is No, as the solution always needs to be on the same NW level (i.e. either '04 or 2004s). SAP development always coordinates changes between Designer, ADS, Reader, and the SAP development environment - and there are a few incompatible changes between '04 and 2004s.
    If you want to develop and render the forms on the 7.0 box and integrate data from a lower-release backend (e.g. R/3 Enterprise), you can do that for interactive scenarios using RFC connections to transfer the data and/or the PDF form from system to system.
    Do not attempt to do this for print forms. The amount of data that may have to be transferred will heavily impact the form generation time.
    Kind regards,
    Markus Meisl
    SAP NetWeaver Product Management

  • I am considering CS6. I worry about "backwards compatability." I am in a windows-only environment.  Some files were antiquated mac computer.  Files are: psd doc eps tif indd otf ai jpg RW2 xmp pm7 bmp fh9 fh10 dng pm6 and ps. Rick

    I am considering CS6. I worry about
    "backwards compatability." I am in a windows-only environment.  Some files were antiquated mac computer.  Files are: psd doc eps tif indd otf ai jpg
    RW2 xmp pm7 bmp fh9 fh10 dng pm6 and ps. Rick

    Backward compatibility FROM what TO what?
    CS6 to older, or newer to CS6?
    For specific answers, you most likely need to check in the forums for specific programs
    The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
    The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
    If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
    You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
    Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

  • Solaris 8 backwards compatibility

    Hi,
    I am about to begin some java development for the Solaris 8 platform on SPARC, and am setting up a dev server. I'd rather install Solaris 9 for reasons of general superiority, but are there any reasons that compiled java binaries from v9 would have problems running on a v8 platform when its deployed? It won't be particularly low-level design: just some database access, tcp/ip SOAP messaging, and XML manipulations.
    thanks
    aj

    In general there is forward compatibility for applications between Solaris releases. There is no official backward compatibility. This means you
    should always compile on the oldest release of
    Solaris that you expectto run on. So, if you need
    to run on Solaris 5.6, 7 and 8, compile on Solaris 5.6.
    There is a tool called appcert which is shipped with
    later versions of Solaris 8 and can be downloaded from:
    http://www.sun.com/developers/tools/appcert/download.html
    That will give you a good idea of the forward and backward compatibility of your application. General ABI information can be found at:
    http://www.sun.com/developers/tools/abi/index.html
    Alan
    Sun Developer Technical Support
    http://www.sun.com/developers/support

  • Known backwards compatibility issues between Robohelp 9 and Robohelp 8?

    Hi Group,
    In addition to avoiding the tasks in the Review menu, does anyone know of any other backwards compatibility issues encountered while opening and using files generated in RoboHelp 9 from within Robohelp 8? Thanks, gail

    Welcome to the forum.
    Simply the fact that RoboHelp 8 will not open a project that has been run in RoboHelp 9. Sure you might well open a project by deleting the CPD and perhaps the XPJ and using the HHP, however I would not recommend that except in an emergency.
    What I am not clear on is how you link that to "avoiding the tasks in the Review menu." What has that got to do with the question?
    See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
    @petergrainge

  • Instalation of SQL server 2005 Backward compatibility components in Windows Seven

    Anyone can help me to install de SQL Server 2005 Backward Compatibility componentes in Windows 7 home, Intel Core Duo
    It say that is not compatible.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    We can see this feature pack was issued in Nov 2005 from the site, which may not be updated
    to add Windows Vista/7 to supported operating systems. However, I can download and install X64 (64-bit)
    Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Backward Compatibility Components on Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit successfully.
    If you get any error while installing, please let me know.
    Thanks,
    Chunsong
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

  • Backwards compatability Id CC to CS6?

    Hello all
    I've been asked to pose this question on behalf of my front-office coworkers who are struggling with editing documents created with Id CC in Id CS6. As of 2014 we are now a big merged company and our West Coast division is making marketing materials in the CC version of InDesign while us folks in the Midwest are still trying to wring the last bit of usefulness out of CS6. I don't see a high degree of sophistication in most of this material so I'd think we could work something out here until everyone gets on the same software boat.
    Since I'm not a regular user of either version of Id can someone lay out what is needed to ensure a decent level of backwards compatibility with documents made with CC? Is it as simple as in Photoshop where you can select maximize compatibility' or 'save as' a previously acceptable format (like .pm4 in the old Pagemaker)?
    Yeah, that last reference really shows my age eh?
    Thanks for any advice

    Hey thanks Bob (hello again, Happy New Year and all)
    I fear that simple suggestion might warp some creative sensibilities with the CC users but it seems like a reasonable solution.
    Let's see what happens. Oh, BTW I have caved and signed up for the 'PS/LR CC Special'. It's like my Netflx subscription - too busy to use it for now, but soooomday...

  • Backwards Compatability of iWeb?..Problems

    On my main mac pro, I have all the latest updates of software etc. and my new iweb site (which is published but not yet launched) works great in Firefox and Safari.
    BTW..I'm still in the 60 day trial period.
    On my older mac at my other desk, I'm running 10.3.9 with Netscape,Safari, and Internet Explorer, all of which are (i think) updated as far as they can go in 10.3.9.
    Problem: the site does not load and function properly on the older mac. Top menue bar is gone, and the photo gallery page comes up blank.
    What is the backwards compatability of this iWeb program?? MOST visiters to a site are NOT going to have the latest and greatest software. Plus, I have NO idea about PC's.
    This could be a deal breaker for anyone who wants to use .Mac in a more serious capacity.
    Any thoughts of ideas??
    Craig

    The 10.3.9 Safari version does not support a lot of the advanced code that Safari 2 creates. For those users I believe the latest Firefox browser will work for them. With the release of Leopard imminent 10.3 is getting left further and further behind.
    The latest Internet Explorer version does handle the iWeb 2 pages satisfactorily as I understand. You can go to http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/ and past your site's URL into the URL field provided and see how the different versions of IE will render the page. I think it does a fair job in duplicating how it will look. But I don't have a PC to compare.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Thumbnail Images Too Small

    I'm having a very big problem with my new iMac. The problem is the size of the thumbnails when opening a photo from an external program or uploading to a website. This is not a problem when browsing photos with the Finder. In the Finder, I see the li

  • Getting my email client to work with my new service

    I have been using an email client, called "TheBat" for almost a decade with my dialup service and am in the process of configuring it with Verizon-yahoo. I have entered the new POP and SMTP settings: incoming.yahoo.verizon.net and outgoing.yahoo.veri

  • App store not showing the OS X mountain Lion purchased sw

    I have purchased OS X mountain Lion sw... I tried downloadint it many times and it would fail due to some error saying "rety" message... Now the App store is not at all showing the s.w in Purchased list... What am I suppose to do??

  • HT5654 itunes update error - corrupted, How do I get my itunes library back on my computer?

    Itunes update error - corrupted. How do I get my Itunes library back on my computer? And if I "rer-install" will my devices , ipod, ipad, etc... be recognised and still contected?

  • Order (HIS1) does not exist

    Hello Experts, while changing the status of an employee, the system displayed an error saying "Order HIS1 Does Not Exist" what is that ?! Thanks in advance