"Balance forward" SQL statement
Has anyone developed a SQL statement that allows balances to be carried forward? Would a UNION query possibly work?
Here's my example where I need to join 3 tables and show results. Based on the example data below, I am looking for a query that allows me to illustrate that the Acrobat 9 Installed Software instances are consuming a license capacity of 6, leaving a balance of 4 that can be applied to the Acrobat 8 Installed Software Instances.
Table: LICENSE
LICENSENUM SWLICENSE LICENSECAPACITY
'1001' 'Adobe Acrobat 9' '10'
Table: LICENSESW
LICENSENUM SWPRODUCT PRECEDENCE
'1001' 'Acrobat 9' '1'
'1001' 'Acrobat 8' '2'
Table: INSTALLEDSW
INSTALLEDSW
'Acrobat 9'
'Acrobat 9'
'Acrobat 9'
'Acrobat 9'
'Acrobat 9'
'Acrobat 9'
'Acrobat 8'
'Acrobat 8'
'Acrobat 8'
'Acrobat 8'
'Acrobat 8'
I can write a select to do total counts, but this does not allow me to carry a balance forward to be applied to Acrobat 8 (precedence 2).
select LICENSE.SWLICENSE, LICENSE.LICENSECAPACITY, count(INSTALLEDSW.INSTALLEDSW) as INSTALLED_COUNT
from LICENSE, LICENSESW, INSTALLEDSW
where LICENSE.LICENSENUM = LICENSESW.LICENSENUM
AND LICENSESW.SWPRODUCT = INSTALLEDSW.INSTALLEDSW
group by LICENSE.SWLICENSE, LICENSE.LICENSECAPACITY;
Results:
SWLICENSE LICENSECAPACITY INSTALLED_COUNT
'Adobe Acrobat 9' '10' '11'
I need results that look like this, where the balance of 4 is carried forward after the first row:
SWLICENSE LICENSECAPACITY INSTALLED_PRODUCT INSTALLED_COUNT
'Adobe Acrobat 9' '6' 'Acrobat 9' '6'
'Adobe Acrobat 9' '4' 'Acrobat 8' '5'
Not easy to follow your example data, but if I demonstrate what I think you are trying to achieve using the emp table, you may be able to see if it helps...
SQL> select deptno, empno, ename
2 ,count(*) over (partition by deptno) as dept_count
3 ,count(*) over (partition by deptno) - row_number() over (partition by deptno order by empno) as remaining
4 from emp
5 order by deptno, empno;
DEPTNO EMPNO ENAME DEPT_COUNT REMAINING
10 7782 CLARK 3 2
10 7839 KING 3 1
10 7934 MILLER 3 0
20 7369 SMITH 5 4
20 7566 JONES 5 3
20 7788 SCOTT 5 2
20 7876 ADAMS 5 1
20 7902 FORD 5 0
30 7499 ALLEN 6 5
30 7521 WARD 6 4
30 7654 MARTIN 6 3
30 7698 BLAKE 6 2
30 7844 TURNER 6 1
30 7900 JAMES 6 0
14 rows selected.using the analytical functions count() and row_number() (you can use others such as sum(), avg(), lag(), lead() etc. as required) you can do processing that carries forward, backwards or across "groups" (aka partitions) of data.
Similar Messages
-
SQL statement running balance query with previous balance taken into account
Hi Guys
I have a SQL statement which caclulates the running balance
for a list of transactions in a transactions table. This SQL
statement is as follows:
SELECT transID, debit, credit,
(SELECT SUM(debit-credit)
FROM transactions as D1
WHERE D1.transID <= D0.transID) AS balance
FROM transactions AS D0
The only problem I'm having is that I have to display
transactions between a particular date range. I have for eg.
transID, transDate, debit, credit fields in my db.
However the problem I'm having is that when the transaction
records are pulled out for the specified date range the balances
are only calculated for those records. I need someway of having a
balance b/f (brought forward) so that the selected records use that
as a 'starting' balance and then calculate the running balance as
normal.
Any easy solutions?
Many, many thanks for your help in advance.
All the best
WesleyYou'd need to determine the b/f then apply it against the
transaction records when they are pulled for a date range. So if
the date range is
Feb 1st, 2009 -> Feb 28th, 2009
You'd need to also get the previous balance in a separate
query, then use it to correctly display the running balance when
you output the date range.
I suppose a simpler way involving a little more DB work (and
possibly lots of coding) is to store the current balance as well
with each transaction; then when performing a date range you'd have
the balance as well and not have to calculate it on the fly. -
I get this error - when I try a Multi-line comment entry - by using the /* and */
"There is an unclosed comment block in the SQL statement. Ensure that there are balanced "/*" and "*/" comment
markers in the SQL statement."
Even though I am entering both the /* and the */.
I tried it many way - in the same line, in different lines etc..
like
/* Select xxx from xxx */
or
Select xxx from xxx
or
/* Select xx from xx
Please help anyone..! ;=(But When I do a Help/About I see that it is
the SSMSE's Help About screen says "SQL Server 2005"
However I downloaded and installed SQL Server 2014 last night and was entering queries..
Most Select Queries work fine..
the -- comment line works fine..then I stumbled on the /* - */ does not work.
Thanks.
Well, you have two different version of SQL Server installed on your machine. Please connect again from SSMS to the SQL Server 2014.
T-SQL Articles
T-SQL e-book by TechNet Wiki Community
T-SQL blog -
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
This post is not a question, but similar to Rob van Wijk's "When your query takes too long ..." post should help to improve the quality of the requests for SQL statement tuning here on OTN.
On the OTN forum very often tuning requests about single SQL statements are posted, but the information provided is rather limited, and therefore it's not that simple to provide a meaningful advice. Instead of writing the same requests for additional information over and over again I thought I put together a post that describes how a "useful" post for such a request should look like and what information it should cover.
I've also prepared very detailed step-by-step instructions how to obtain that information on my blog, which can be used to easily gather the required information. It also covers again the details how to post the information properly here, in particular how to use the \ tag to preserve formatting and get a fixed font output:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
So again: This post here describes how a "useful" post should look like and what information it ideally covers. The blog post explains in detail how to obtain that information.
In the future, rather than requesting the same additional information and explaining how to obtain it, I'll simply refer to this HOW TO post and the corresponding blog post which describes in detail how to get that information.
*Very important:*
Use the \ tag to enclose any output that should have its formatting preserved as shown below.
So if you want to use fixed font formatting that preserves the spaces etc., do the following:
\ This preserves formatting
\And it will look like this:
This preserves formatting
. . .Your post should cover the following information:
1. The SQL and a short description of its purpose
2. The version of your database with 4-digits (e.g. 10.2.0.4)
3. Optimizer related parameters
4. The TIMING and AUTOTRACE output
5. The EXPLAIN PLAN output
6. The TKPROF output snippet that corresponds to your statement
7. If you're on 10g or later, the DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR output
The above mentioned blog post describes in detail how to obtain that information.
Your post should have a meaningful subject, e.g. "SQL statement tuning request", and the message body should look similar to the following:
*-- Start of template body --*
The following SQL statement has been identified to perform poorly. It currently takes up to 10 seconds to execute, but it's supposed to take a second at most.
This is the statement:
select
from
t_demo
where
type = 'VIEW'
order by
id;It should return data from a table in a specific order.
The version of the database is 11.1.0.7.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer:
SQL>
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 11.1.0.7
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes boolean FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics boolean FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines boolean TRUE
SQL>
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 8
SQL>
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_block_size integer 8192
SQL>
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACT
SQL>
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL>
SQL> select
2 sname
3 , pname
4 , pval1
5 , pval2
6 from
7 sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART 01-30-2009 16:25
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP 01-30-2009 16:25
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 0
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 494,397
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.Here is the output of EXPLAIN PLAN:
SQL> explain plan for
2 -- put your statement here
3 select
4 *
5 from
6 t_demo
7 where
8 type = 'VIEW'
9 order by
10 id;
Explained.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SQL>
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1390505571
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 60 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_DEMO | 1 | 60 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_DEMO | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("TYPE"='VIEW')
14 rows selected.Here is the output of SQL*Plus AUTOTRACE including the TIMING information:
SQL> rem Set the ARRAYSIZE according to your application
SQL> set autotrace traceonly arraysize 100
SQL> select
2 *
3 from
4 t_demo
5 where
6 type = 'VIEW'
7 order by
8 id;
149938 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.21
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1390505571
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 60 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_DEMO | 1 | 60 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_DEMO | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("TYPE"='VIEW')
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
149101 consistent gets
800 physical reads
196 redo size
1077830 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
16905 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1501 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
149938 rows processed
SQL>
SQL> disconnect
Disconnected from Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing optionsThe TKPROF output for this statement looks like the following:
TKPROF: Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production on Mo Feb 23 10:23:08 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Trace file: orcl11_ora_3376_mytrace1.trc
Sort options: default
count = number of times OCI procedure was executed
cpu = cpu time in seconds executing
elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
select
from
t_demo
where
type = 'VIEW'
order by
id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1501 0.53 1.36 800 149101 0 149938
total 1503 0.53 1.36 800 149101 0 149938
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 88
Rows Row Source Operation
149938 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T_DEMO (cr=149101 pr=800 pw=0 time=60042 us cost=0 size=60 card=1)
149938 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_DEMO (cr=1881 pr=1 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 74895)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1501 0.00 0.00
db file sequential read 800 0.05 0.80
SQL*Net message from client 1501 0.00 0.69
********************************************************************************The DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR output:
SQL> -- put your statement here
SQL> -- use the GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS hint
SQL> -- if you're not using STATISTICS_LEVEL = ALL
SQL> select /*+ gather_plan_statistics */
2 *
3 from
4 t_demo
5 where
6 type = 'VIEW'
7 order by
8 id;
149938 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.21
SQL>
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null, null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID d4k5acu783vu8, child number 0
select /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ * from t_demo
where type = 'VIEW' order by id
Plan hash value: 1390505571
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 149K|00:00:00.02 | 149K| 1183 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_DEMO | 1 | 1 | 149K|00:00:00.02 | 149K| 1183 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_DEMO | 1 | 1 | 149K|00:00:00.02 | 1880 | 383 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("TYPE"='VIEW')
20 rows selected.I'm looking forward for suggestions how to improve the performance of this statement.
*-- End of template body --*
I'm sure that if you follow these instructions and obtain the information described, post them using a proper formatting (don't forget about the \ tag) you'll receive meaningful advice very soon.
So, just to make sure you didn't miss this point:Use proper formatting!
If you think I missed something important in this sample post let me know so that I can improve it.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/Alex Nuijten wrote:
...you missed the proper formatting of the Autotrace section ;-)Alex,
can't reproduce, does it still look unformatted? Or are you simply kidding? :-)
Randolf
PS: Just noticed that it actually sometimes doesn't show the proper formatting although the code tags are there. Changing to the \ tag helped in this case, but it seems to be odd.
Edited by: Randolf Geist on Feb 23, 2009 11:28 AM
Odd behaviour of forum software -
TestStand Open SQL Statement does not support SQL's ORDER BY clause???
TestStand 1.0.3
Windows 2000 SP1
SQL Server 2000 Personal
You've got to be kidding me...
It appears that the built-in TestStand Open SQL Step does NOT support the
"ORDER BY" clause in the SELECT statement, even though the documentation
says it does. Is this true?
I have an Open SQL Statement query:
"SELECT * FROM [MyTable] WHERE ([Batch ID]=1234)"
it works fine, returning a correct record count 120 records. If I change
the Open SQL Statement query simply by adding an ORDER BY clause, such as:
"SELECT * FROM [MyTable] WHERE ([Batch ID]=1234) ORDER BY [MyField] ASC"
it returns a record count of zero. I know that "MyField" exists in the
MyTable table and contains valid data. The
second query works fine in SQL
Server Enterprise Manager.
Am I missing something? Is it true that the TestStand Open SQL Step does
NOT support the "ORDER BY" clause? If not, what &#$!ing good is it and why
does the manual state it is supported? Is there any other way using just
the TestStand steps to order a database recordset on one or more fields?
Any help would be appreciated.
Grrrrr....
Bob Rafuse
Etec Inc.> Bob -
> The database step types do not do anything special to the SQL command
> that you give it. The step just passes the command to the ADO
> provider. I tried a simple query using the step types with the
> following command,
>
> "SELECT UUT_RESULT.* FROM UUT_RESULT WHERE ([UUT_SERIAL_NUMBER] =
> 12345) ORDER BY [EXECUTION_TIME] ASC"
>
> and this return the expected results and the record count parameter
> was as expected. I tried this on TS 1.0.2 and TS 2.0 with MS Access
> 2000 and MS SQL Server 7.0. I do not have MS SQL Server 2000 at this
> time.
>
> It would be surprised if the step types are messing something up.
I've been doing some experimenting over the past couple of days. Simple,
one-table queries seem to handle the ORDER BY clause fine. Th
ings seem to
get messed up when I try multi-table queries with ORDER BY clause with the
TestStand database steps. I get no errors but the returned record counts
are always 0 with the ORDER BY and positive without the ORDER BY. The exact
same queries work fine in Visual Basic/ADO and the SQL Server Query
Analyzer.
> Questions:
> 1. Have you verified whether the data is actually returned even though
> the record count is zero?
Hmmm... yes data IS getting returned (at least on the two instances I just
checked), but the record count is always zero. I was not proceeding with
processing if the record count was 0.
Still... I don't know how to loop through the recordset without knowing how
many records there are an not eventually generate an error by passing EOF.
Is there another way using the TestStand database steps to determine a) the
number of records in the recordset or b) when I'm at EOF?
> 2. Are you using any advanced options on the Opend SQL Statement step
> type, specifically
the cursor type set to forward only? Forward only
> cursors do not allow for record counts.
Everything on the Advanced tab of the Open SQL Statement step is set to "Use
Default".
Bob. -
Strange SQL statement in my PL/SQL session
Hi all,
i found a very strange SQL statement in my session.
SELECT 1
FROM SYS.streams$_prepare_ddl p
WHERE ( (p.global_flag = 1 AND :1 IS NULL)
OR (p.global_flag = 0 AND p.usrid = :2)
AND ROWNUM = 1;
This statement is waiting latch wait event but consistent get higher and higher.
This session seems didn't execute my PL/SQL's main logic and halt at this statement.
And after 5 or 6 hours this session is error out with snapshot too old.
Does anyone know what this statement doing? according to Metalink for create table and create user statement will trigger this statement. But why it takes so long?
Looking forward for your advise...If you have a problem with latch events, then maybe this session or another session is doing a similar action quite often and using the latches.
I would check for some part of you application that constantly tries to create tables and/or users. Maybe it is possible to change that logic. E.g. use global temp tables.
Also post your database version. Did you migrate recently or is it a fresh install?
@user594309: Think more before posting. And read up about bind variables. -
This SQL statement always in Top Activity, with PX Deq Credit: send blkd
Hi gurus,
The following SQL statement is always among the Top Activity. I can see the details in Enerprise manager that it suffers from PX Deq Credit: send blkd
This is the statement:
SELECT S.Product, S.WH_CODE, S.RACK, S.BATCH, S.EXP_DATE, FLOOR(Qty_Beg) QtyBeg_B,
ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Beg-FLOOR(Qty_Beg), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyBeg_K,
FLOOR(Qty_In) QtyIn_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_In-FLOOR(Qty_In), P.UOM_K), 0) QtyIn_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Out) QtyOut_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Out-FLOOR(Qty_Out), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyOut_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Adj) QtyAdj_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Adj-FLOOR(Qty_Adj), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyAdj_K,
FLOOR(Qty_End) QtyEnd_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_End-FLOOR(Qty_End), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyEnd_K,
S.LOC_CODE
FROM V_STOCK_DETAIL S
JOIN PRODUCTS P ON P.PRODUCT = S.PRODUCT
WHERE S.Product = :pProduct AND S.WH_CODE = :pWhCode AND S.LOC_CODE = :pLocCode;The statement is invoked by our front end (web based app) for a browse table displayed on a web page. The result can be 10 to 8000. It is used to display the current stock availability for a particular product in a particular warehouse. The stock availability it self is kept in a View : V_Stock_Detail
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer:
SQL> show parameter user_dump_dest
user_dump_dest string /u01/app/oracle/admin/ITTDB/udump
SQL> show parameter optimizer
_optimizer_cost_based_transformation string OFF
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
SQL> show parameter db_block_size column sname format a20 column pname format a20
db_block_size integer 8192Here is the output of EXPLAIN PLAN:
SQL> explain plan for
SELECT S.Product, S.WH_CODE, S.RACK, S.BATCH, S.EXP_DATE, FLOOR(Qty_Beg) QtyBeg_B,
ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Beg-FLOOR(Qty_Beg), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyBeg_K,
FLOOR(Qty_In) QtyIn_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_In-FLOOR(Qty_In), P.UOM_K), 0) QtyIn_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Out) QtyOut_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Out-FLOOR(Qty_Out), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyOut_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Adj) QtyAdj_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Adj-FLOOR(Qty_Adj), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyAdj_K,
FLOOR(Qty_End) QtyEnd_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_End-FLOOR(Qty_End), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyEnd_K,
S.LOC_CODE
FROM V_STOCK_DETAIL S
JOIN PRODUCTS P ON P.PRODUCT = S.PRODUCT
WHERE S.Product = :pProduct AND S.WH_CODE = :pWhCode AND S.LOC_CODE = :pLocCode
Explain complete.
Elapsed: 00:00:00:31
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3252950027
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ
Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 169 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | | |
|
| 1 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | |
|
| 2 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10003 | 1 | 169 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | Q1,03 | P->S | QC
(RAND) |
| 3 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 169 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | Q1,03 | PCWP |
|
| 4 | PX RECEIVE | | 1 | 169 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | Q1,03 | PCWP |
|
| 5 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10002 | 1 | 169 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | P->P | HA
SH |
| 6 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 169 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 169 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 8 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 1 | 119 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 9 | SORT JOIN | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 49 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 11 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWC |
|
| 12 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 13 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10000 | | | | | | S->P | BR
OADCAST |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PRODUCTS_IDX2 | 1 | 25 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|
| 15 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 1 | 24 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWC |
|
|* 16 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_CONVERT_UOM | 1 | 24 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 17 | BUFFER SORT | | 1 | 70 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 18 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWC |
|
| 19 | PX RECEIVE | | 1 | 70 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
| 20 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10001 | 1 | 70 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | S->P | BR
OADCAST |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| STOCK | 1 | 70 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STOCK_PK | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_TRANS_STOCK | 1 | 50 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MV_TRANS_STOCK_IDX1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | Q1,02 | PCWP |
|
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
14 - access("P"."PRODUCT"=:PPRODUCT)
16 - filter("CON"."PRODUCT"=:PPRODUCT)
21 - filter("STOCK"."LOC_CODE"=:PLOCCODE)
22 - access("STOCK"."PRODUCT"=:PPRODUCT AND "STOCK"."WH_CODE"=:PWHCODE)
23 - filter("STS"(+)='N')
24 - access("PRODUCT"(+)=:PPRODUCT AND "WH_CODE"(+)=:PWHCODE AND "LOC_CODE"(+)=:PLOCCODE AND "RACK"(+)="STOCK"."RACK" AND
"BATCH"(+)="STOCK"."BATCH" AND "EXP_DATE"(+)="STOCK"."EXP_DATE")
42 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00:06Here is the output of SQL*Plus AUTOTRACE including the TIMING information:
SQL> SELECT S.Product, S.WH_CODE, S.RACK, S.BATCH, S.EXP_DATE, FLOOR(Qty_Beg) QtyBeg_B,
ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Beg-FLOOR(Qty_Beg), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyBeg_K,
FLOOR(Qty_In) QtyIn_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_In-FLOOR(Qty_In), P.UOM_K), 0) QtyIn_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Out) QtyOut_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Out-FLOOR(Qty_Out), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyOut_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Adj) QtyAdj_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Adj-FLOOR(Qty_Adj), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyAdj_K,
FLOOR(Qty_End) QtyEnd_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_End-FLOOR(Qty_End), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyEnd_K,
S.LOC_CODE
FROM V_STOCK_DETAIL S
JOIN PRODUCTS P ON P.PRODUCT = S.PRODUCT
WHERE S.Product = :pProduct AND S.WH_CODE = :pWhCode AND S.LOC_CODE = :pLocCode
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=ALL_ROWS 1 169 6
1 0 PX COORDINATOR
2 1 PX SEND QC (RANDOM) SYS.:TQ10003 1 169 6 :Q1003 P->S QC (RANDOM)
3 2 HASH GROUP BY 1 169 6 :Q1003 PCWP
4 3 PX RECEIVE 1 169 6 :Q1003 PCWP
5 4 PX SEND HASH SYS.:TQ10002 1 169 6 :Q1002 P->P HASH
6 5 HASH GROUP BY 1 169 6 :Q1002 PCWP
7 6 NESTED LOOPS OUTER 1 169 5 :Q1002 PCWP
8 7 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN 1 119 4 :Q1002 PCWP
9 8 SORT JOIN :Q1002 PCWP
10 9 NESTED LOOPS 1 49 4 :Q1002 PCWP
11 10 BUFFER SORT :Q1002 PCWC
12 11 PX RECEIVE :Q1002 PCWP
13 12 PX SEND BROADCAST SYS.:TQ10000 S->P BROADCAST
14 13 INDEX RANGE SCAN ITT_NEW.PRODUCTS_IDX2 1 25 2
15 10 PX BLOCK ITERATOR 1 24 2 :Q1002 PCWC
16 15 MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL ITT_NEW.MV_CONVERT_UOM 1 24 2 :Q1002 PCWP
17 8 BUFFER SORT 1 70 2 :Q1002 PCWP
18 17 BUFFER SORT :Q1002 PCWC
19 18 PX RECEIVE 1 70 4 :Q1002 PCWP
20 19 PX SEND BROADCAST SYS.:TQ10001 1 70 4 S->P BROADCAST
21 20 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ITT_NEW.STOCK 1 70 4
22 21 INDEX RANGE SCAN ITT_NEW.STOCK_PK 1 2
23 7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ITT_NEW.MV_TRANS_STOCK 1 50 3 :Q1002 PCWP
24 23 INDEX RANGE SCAN ITT_NEW.MV_TRANS_STOCK_IDX1 1 2 :Q1002 PCWP
Statistics
570 recursive calls
0 physical write total IO requests
0 physical write total multi block requests
0 physical write total bytes
0 physical writes direct temporary tablespace
0 java session heap live size max
0 java session heap object count
0 java session heap object count max
0 java session heap collected count
0 java session heap collected bytes
83 rows processed
Elapsed: 00:00:03:24
SQL> disconnect
Commit complete
Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining optionsThe TKPROF output for this statement looks like the following:
TKPROF: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Thu Apr 23 12:39:29 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Trace file: ittdb_ora_9566_mytrace1.trc
Sort options: default
count = number of times OCI procedure was executed
cpu = cpu time in seconds executing
elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
SELECT S.Product, S.WH_CODE, S.RACK, S.BATCH, S.EXP_DATE, FLOOR(Qty_Beg) QtyBeg_B,
ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Beg-FLOOR(Qty_Beg), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyBeg_K,
FLOOR(Qty_In) QtyIn_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_In-FLOOR(Qty_In), P.UOM_K), 0) QtyIn_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Out) QtyOut_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Out-FLOOR(Qty_Out), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyOut_K,
FLOOR(Qty_Adj) QtyAdj_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Adj-FLOOR(Qty_Adj), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyAdj_K,
FLOOR(Qty_End) QtyEnd_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_End-FLOOR(Qty_End), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyEnd_K,
S.LOC_CODE
FROM V_STOCK_DETAIL S
JOIN PRODUCTS P ON P.PRODUCT = S.PRODUCT
WHERE S.Product = :pProduct AND S.WH_CODE = :pWhCode AND S.LOC_CODE = :pLocCode
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.04 0.12 0 10 4 0
Fetch 43 0.05 2.02 0 73 0 83
total 45 0.10 2.15 0 83 4 83
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 164
Rows Row Source Operation
83 PX COORDINATOR (cr=83 pr=0 pw=0 time=2086576 us)
0 PX SEND QC (RANDOM) :TQ10003 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 HASH GROUP BY (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 PX RECEIVE (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 PX SEND HASH :TQ10002 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 HASH GROUP BY (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 NESTED LOOPS OUTER (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 SORT JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 BUFFER SORT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 PX RECEIVE (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 PX SEND BROADCAST :TQ10000 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN PRODUCTS_IDX2 (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=62 us)(object id 135097)
0 PX BLOCK ITERATOR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL MV_CONVERT_UOM (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 BUFFER SORT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 BUFFER SORT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 PX RECEIVE (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 PX SEND BROADCAST :TQ10001 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
83 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID STOCK (cr=78 pr=0 pw=0 time=1635 us)
83 INDEX RANGE SCAN STOCK_PK (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=458 us)(object id 135252)
0 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MV_TRANS_STOCK (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 INDEX RANGE SCAN MV_TRANS_STOCK_IDX1 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)(object id 143537)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
PX Deq: Join ACK 17 0.00 0.00
PX qref latch 2 0.00 0.00
PX Deq Credit: send blkd 72 1.95 2.00
PX Deq: Parse Reply 26 0.01 0.01
SQL*Net message to client 43 0.00 0.00
PX Deq: Execute Reply 19 0.00 0.01
SQL*Net message from client 43 0.00 0.04
PX Deq: Signal ACK 12 0.00 0.00
enq: PS - contention 1 0.00 0.00
********************************************************************************The DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR output:
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null, null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'))
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 402b8st7vt6ku, child number 2
SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ S.Product, S.WH_CODE, S.RACK, S.BATCH, S.EXP_DATE, FLOOR(Qty_Beg) QtyBeg_B,
ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Beg-FLOOR(Qty_Beg), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyBeg_K, FLOOR(Qty_In) QtyIn_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.P
RODUCT,
Qty_In-FLOOR(Qty_In), P.UOM_K), 0) QtyIn_K, FLOOR(Qty_Out) QtyOut_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Out-FLOOR(Qty_Out), P
.UOM_K ),
0) QtyOut_K, FLOOR(Qty_Adj) QtyAdj_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_Adj-FLOOR(Qty_Adj), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyAdj_K,
FLOOR(Qty_End) QtyEnd_B, ROUND(f_convert_qty(S.PRODUCT, Qty_End-FLOOR(Qty_End), P.UOM_K ), 0) QtyEnd_K, S.LOC_CODE FROM
V_STOCK_DETAIL S JOIN PRODUCTS P ON P.PRODUCT = S.PRODUCT WHERE S.Product = :pProduct AND S.WH_CODE = :pWhCode AND S.LOC
_CODE =
:pLocCode
Plan hash value: 3252950027
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | OMem |
1Mem | Used-Mem |
| 1 | PX COORDINATOR | | 1 | | 83 |00:00:02.25 | 83 | |
| |
| 2 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10003 | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 3 | HASH GROUP BY | | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 4 | PX RECEIVE | | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 5 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10002 | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 6 | HASH GROUP BY | | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 8 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 9 | SORT JOIN | | 0 | | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 73728 |
73728 | |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 0 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 11 | BUFFER SORT | | 0 | | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 73728 |
73728 | |
| 12 | PX RECEIVE | | 0 | | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 13 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10000 | 0 | | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PRODUCTS_IDX2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 2 | |
| |
| 15 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 0 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
|* 16 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_CONVERT_UOM | 0 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 17 | BUFFER SORT | | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 73728 |
73728 | |
| 18 | BUFFER SORT | | 0 | | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 73728 |
73728 | |
| 19 | PX RECEIVE | | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
| 20 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10001 | 0 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| STOCK | 1 | 21 | 83 |00:00:00.01 | 78 | |
| |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STOCK_PK | 1 | 91 | 83 |00:00:00.01 | 4 | |
| |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_TRANS_STOCK | 0 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MV_TRANS_STOCK_IDX1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | |
| |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
14 - access("P"."PRODUCT"=:PPRODUCT)
16 - access(:Z>=:Z AND :Z<=:Z)
filter("CON"."PRODUCT"=:PPRODUCT)
21 - filter("STOCK"."LOC_CODE"=:PLOCCODE)
22 - access("STOCK"."PRODUCT"=:PPRODUCT AND "STOCK"."WH_CODE"=:PWHCODE)
23 - filter("STS"='N')
24 - access("PRODUCT"=:PPRODUCT AND "WH_CODE"=:PWHCODE AND "LOC_CODE"=:PLOCCODE AND "RACK"="STOCK"."RACK" AND "BATCH"="STOCK"."B
ATCH" AND
"EXP_DATE"="STOCK"."EXP_DATE")
53 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00:12I'm looking forward for suggestions how to improve the performance of this statement.
Thank you very much,
xtantoxtanto wrote:
Hi sir,
How to prevent the query from doing parallel query ?
Because as you see actually I am not issuing any Parallel hints in the query.
Thank you,
xtantoKristanto,
there are a couple of points to consider:
1. Your SQL*Plus version seems to be outdated. Please use a SQL*Plus version that corresponds to your database version. E.g. the AUTOTRACE output is odd.
2. I would suggest to repeat your exercise using serial execution (the plan, the autotrace, the tracing). You can disable parallel queries by issuing this in your session:
ALTER SESSION DISABLE PARALLEL QUERY;
This way the output of the tools is much more meaningful, however you might get a different execution plan, therefore the results might not be representative for your parallel execution.
3. The function calls might pose a problem. If they are, one possible damage limitation has been provided by hoek. Even better would be then to replace the PL/SQL function with equivalent plain SQL. However since you say that it generates not too many rows it might not harm here too much. You can check the impact of the functions by running a similar query but omitting the function calls.
4. The parallel execution plan contains a MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN operation which could be an issue if the estimates of the optimizer are incorrect. If the serial execution still uses this operation the TKPROF and DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR output will reveal whether this is a problem or not.
5. The execution of the statement seems to take on 2-3 seconds in your tests. Is this in the right ballpark? If yes, why should this statement then be problematic? How often does it get executed?
6. The statement uses bind variables, so you might have executions that use different execution plans depending on the bind values passed when the statement got optimized. You can use DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR using NULL as "child_number" parameter or DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_AWR (if you have a AWR license) to check if you have multiple execution plans for the statement. Please note that older versions might have already been aged out of the shared pool, so the AWR repository might be a more reliable source (but only if the statement has been sampled).
7. You have disabled cost based transformations: "_optimizer_cost_based_transformation" = OFF. Why?
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/ -
Hi All,
My current client has a custom program which will clear all customer open items and posts the balance as a transaction with specific document type. (The client calls this as balance forward as they are forwarding the balance). This balance is forwarded to another custom module kind of thing where they generate a customer statement which has details like how much the owe and the customer owes them. Based on this, they review the customer account and decide whether to pay him or not.
My question is, is there a standard program or report which will clear all open items and post the balance. Or any other standard SAP way to do this instead of using custom program?
Please respond with your thoughts and solutions as this is very important for me. I need to come up with a solution for this.
Thank you for your time and help.
Regards,
SatyaThanks for the quick response.
I agree with you that it is not actual balance forward process. Since they are forwarding the balance they call it as balance forward.
Carrying the balance to new fiscal year is a seperate process for the client which is not included in this process what i explianed now. This process is mainly for specific type of customers where you can see all payments to customers and also collections from customers.
You said they can use standard reports to see how much they have to pay to customer. Any idea what these reports are?
At the time of payments, they modify the payment amount if necessary. I think this can be achieved by SAP Partial payment.
I guess this whole custom process the client is having can be achieved in bit and pieces by standard SAP but do not know how?
It would be really great if anyone can throw some light on it.
Regards,
Satya -
SQL Statement needed for Query Generator
Dear Experts,
My view has the following three columns.
1, Start Date
2. End Date
3. Balance.
I need an SQL statement to write in query generator, which has to check if EndDate is less than the Current date and balance is above zero. If so, it assumes the last date of the job is already over, outstanding materials not yet been returned. Hence it has to return 'Pending'. If EndDate is greater than current date, it means final date for completion of the process is yet to come. So the task is in progress, hence it has to return 'Progress'. If the balance is Zero, all materials connected with the task have been received either as a FG or as Raw Materials. So it has to return, 'Completed'. I need a singe SQL Statement for this.
Please help me.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
AnandDear Anand,
Try this one:
CASE balance WHEN 0 THEN 'Completed' ELSE CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DD, EndDate, GetDate()) >= 0 THEN 'Progress' ELSE 'Pending' END END
I have assumed you don't have negative balance. It that is not true, give me the complete case.
Thanks,
Gordon
Thanks,
Gordon -
Hello all that can help,
i am programming in Ready to Program to connect to a VideoShop database using SQL statements.
I am having trouble when using single and double inverted commas. eg vs.updateRentTable ("DELETE FROM RentTable WHERE CustId=);
but instead of specifiying the CustId i want to make it a variable id so that i can delete any name i want according to their ID.
also i am wondering if it is possible to write data from a database into a text file? is it possible to use Printwriter?
Looking forward to your help,
Manuking16Hi Manuking_16,
Your question should be posted on a sql forum, not on a JDBC forum. Anyway. Just looking for answers, right?
1) If your datatype is INT, you do not use either quotes " or single quotes in your SQL statement
DELETE FROM RentTable WHERE CustId= 12345.
To build the SQL String in JAVA just write:
{code}String sqlStatement = "DELETE FROM RentTable WHERE CustId = " + custID; // custID will be casted to String.{code}
2) Use preparedStatement
{code}PreparedStatement pStm = conn.prepareStatement(�DELETE FROM RentTable WHERE CustId = ?");
pStm.setInt(1, customerID);
int numberOfDeletedLines = pStm.execute();3) If you want to enter the real name to do the deletion
DELETE FROM RentTable WHERE CustId IN (select custID FROM Customer WHERE name = "joe bob johnson")
To build the SQL String in JAVA just write: String sqlStatement = "DELETE FROM RentTable WHERE CustId IN (select custID FROM Customer WHERE name = '" + sCustomerName + "' )"; // just copy & pasteHope I got your question right. -
Sql statement generator for java.
Is there a (api's ) tool which generates sql statements given a database table, which can be embeeded into the application.
Dear Anand,
Try this one:
CASE balance WHEN 0 THEN 'Completed' ELSE CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DD, EndDate, GetDate()) >= 0 THEN 'Progress' ELSE 'Pending' END END
I have assumed you don't have negative balance. It that is not true, give me the complete case.
Thanks,
Gordon
Thanks,
Gordon -
Why has the sql statement been extucted two times in shell script?
I tried to test rac load balance using the following shell script on suse 10 + oracle 10g rac.
oracle@SZDB:~> more load_balance.sh
#!/bin/bash
for i in {1..20}
do
echo $i
sqlplus -S system/oracle@ORA10G <<EOF
select instance_name from v\$instance;
EOF
sleep 1
done
exit 0After execute shell script, I got the follow result.
oracle@SZDB:~> ./load_balance.sh
1
INSTANCE_NAME
ora10g2
INSTANCE_NAME
ora10g2
2
INSTANCE_NAME
ora10g1
INSTANCE_NAME
ora10g1
3
INSTANCE_NAME
ora10g1
INSTANCE_NAME
ora10g1Seem the sql statement has been executed two times in each loop. If you feel free please help to have a look. Thanks in advance.
RobinsonYou can end a SQL command in one of three ways:
* with a semicolon (;)
* with a slash (/) on a line by itself
* with a blank line
A semicolon (;) tells SQL*Plus that you want to run the current command that was entered. SQL*Plus processes the command and also stores the command in the SQL buffer.
A blank line in a SQL statement or script tells SQL*Plus that you have finished entering the command, but do not want to run it yet, but it's stored the command on SQL Buffer.
A slash (/) on a line by itself tells SQL*Plus that you wish to run the command stored on SQL buffer. -
Failed to post data to database during "Update": SQL Statement
Hi,
I'm getting this error while trying to update a VO via BCBrowser or UI.
Failed to post data to database during "Update": SQL Statement
This is a simple & straight forward default VO created on Entity Object (Database Table)
On the same table & with same DB credentials, I could successfully update the record.
Any Guess, on what went Wrong??
Thanks in Advance for any help.
p.s Jdev 11.1.1.6
Log:
oracle.jbo.DMLException: JBO-26041: Failed to post data to database during "Update": SQL Statement "BEGIN UPDATE CAR CarEO SET SEL_ITEM=:1 WHERE TXN_NO=:2 AND LOGID=:3 AND SEQNO=:4 RETURNING DELIVERY_MODE, CERTIFICATION_REQ, SOFT_COPY_IND, SELITEM INTO :5, :6, :7, :8; END;".
at oracle.jbo.server.OracleSQLBuilderImpl.doEntityDML(OracleSQLBuilderImpl.java:583)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.doDML(EntityImpl.java:8575)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.postChanges(EntityImpl.java:6816)
at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.doPostTransactionListeners(DBTransactionImpl.java:3290)
at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.postChanges(DBTransactionImpl.java:3093)
at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.commitInternal(DBTransactionImpl.java:2097)
at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.commit(DBTransactionImpl.java:2378)
at oracle.adf.model.bc4j.DCJboDataControl.commitTransaction(DCJboDataControl.java:1615)
at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCDataControl.callCommitTransaction(DCDataControl.java:1417)
at oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUCtrlActionBinding.doIt(JUCtrlActionBinding.java:1437)
at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCDataControl.invokeOperation(DCDataControl.java:2150)
at oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUCtrlActionBinding.invoke(JUCtrlActionBinding.java:740)
at oracle.jbo.uicli.jui.JUActionBinding.actionPerformed(JUActionBinding.java:193)
at oracle.jbo.uicli.controls.JUNavigationBar.doAction(JUNavigationBar.java:412)
at oracle.jbo.jbotester.NavigationBar.doAction(NavigationBar.java:111)
at oracle.jbo.uicli.controls.JUNavigationBar$NavButton.actionPerformed(JUNavigationBar.java:118)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1995)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2318)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:387)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:242)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicButtonListener.mouseReleased(BasicButtonListener.java:236)
at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.mouseReleased(AWTEventMulticaster.java:272)
at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:6289)
at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(JComponent.java:3267)
at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:6054)
at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2041)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4652)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2099)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4482)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:4577)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:4238)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:4168)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2085)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:2478)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4482)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:644)
at java.awt.EventQueue.access$000(EventQueue.java:85)
at java.awt.EventQueue$1.run(EventQueue.java:603)
at java.awt.EventQueue$1.run(EventQueue.java:601)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.security.AccessControlContext$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(AccessControlContext.java:87)
at java.security.AccessControlContext$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(AccessControlContext.java:98)
at java.awt.EventQueue$2.run(EventQueue.java:617)
at java.awt.EventQueue$2.run(EventQueue.java:615)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.security.AccessControlContext$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(AccessControlContext.java:87)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:614)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:269)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:184)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:174)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:169)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:161)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:122)
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column type
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleCallableStatement.registerOutParameterInternal(OracleCallableStatement.java:150)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleCallableStatement.registerOutParameter(OracleCallableStatement.java:399)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleCallableStatement.registerOutParameter(OracleCallableStatement.java:581)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleCallableStatementWrapper.registerOutParameter(OracleCallableStatementWrapper.java:1765)
at oracle.jbo.server.OracleSQLBuilderImpl.bindUpdateStatement(OracleSQLBuilderImpl.java:2243)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.bindDMLStatement(EntityImpl.java:10524)
at oracle.jbo.server.OracleSQLBuilderImpl.doEntityDML(OracleSQLBuilderImpl.java:412)
... 52 moreThe issue is resolved now.
new Columns added to the Database table, after creating Entity Object. These latest changes were not picked up in Entity Object.
I found this difference after comparison of entity object with DB Table.
And when I added those new columns to EO & VO, I'm not getting this error anymore.
Thanks to all who tried to help -
How can i use one SQL statement to solve problem?
How can i use one SQL statement to solve the question below?
For a Table named A, there is a column named F(char type).
Now select all the records where F like '%00' and update their F value to '%01'
Just one SQL statement.Do not use PL/SQL block.
How to do that?
Thanks.What is the data volume for this table?
Do you expect lots of rows to have '%00' as their value?
Following two statements come to mind. Other experts would be able to provide better alternatives:
If you have index on SUBSTR(f, 2):
UPDATE A
SET f = SUBSTR(f,
1,
length(f) - 2) || '01'
WHERE substr(f,
-2) = '00';If most of the rows have pattern '%00':
UPDATE A
SET f = SUBSTR(f,
1,
length(f) - 2) ||
DECODE(SUBSTR(f,
-2),
'00',
'01',
SUBSTR(f,
-2)); -
How do I use SQL statements to perform calculations with form fields????
Please help!!! I don't know how to use a SQL statement within my APEX form......
My form is below. The user will enter the values in the form. Click on Submit. Then we need to run a SQL select statement with those values.
Our form looks like this:
Start_Date ____________
Per_Period ____________
Period ____________
[Submit Button]
The user will enter these 3 values in the form.
This is an example of an user providing the values:
Start_Date 03/14/08_______
Per_Period $200.00________
Period 4____________
[Submit Button]
Then they will click the Submit Button.
The SQL statement (BELOW) returns output based on the users selections:
START_DATE PER_PERIOD PERIOD
14-MAR-2008 00:00 200 Week 1 of 4
21-MAR-2008 00:00 200 Week 2 of 4
28-MAR-2008 00:00 200 Week 3 of 4
04-APR-2008 00:00 200 Week 4 of 4
Total 800
This is the full text of the SQL that makes the output above:
with criteria as (select to_date('03/14/08', 'mm/dd/rr') as start_date,
4 as periods,
'Week' as period,
200 per_period from dual),
periods as (select 'Week' period, 7 days, 0 months from dual
union all select 'BiWeek', 14, 0 from dual
union all select 'Month', 0, 1 from dual
union all select 'ByMonth', 0, 2 from dual
union all select 'Quarter', 0, 3 from dual
union all select 'Year', 0 , 12 from dual
t1 as (
select add_months(start_date,months*(level-1))+days*(level-1) start_date,
per_period,
c.period||' '||level||' of '||c.periods period
from criteria c join periods p on c.period = p.period
connect by level <= periods)
select case grouping(start_date)
when 1 then 'Total'
else to_char(start_date)
end start_date,
sum(per_period) per_period,
period
from t1
group by rollup ((start_date, period))
THANKS VERY MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You're just doing a parameterized report, where the input fields are your parameters.
Check out the Advanced Tutorial titled Parameterized Report here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10513_01/doc/appdev.310/e10497/rprt_query.htm#BGBEEBJA
Good luck,
Stew
Maybe you are looking for
-
VENDOR is mapped to the dialog column (USAGE_VENDOR) that does not exist
Hello, I'm trying to install Solman 4.0 Unicode. When I start sapinst and select a Central System, I get an error before it even gets to the point where I can input some parameters. The error is below, has anyone experienced this? Thank you. ~TJ E
-
Need some help with a controller module
i have a controller module with a model # of CA1009. i've been trying to track down a configuration manual online but haven't had any luck. what i'm trying to determine is whether or not this particular model supports a fiber connection. here are som
-
How to remove macros from word 2010 documents?
I have some .dot files that I'm using as templates for a while. They used to have Macros to do some stuff and I started to replace those macros with Add-ins. What happens is that the macro menus are still there. I tried to remove the macros (using al
-
Digital camera RAW Compatibility update 6.02 does not seem to update and keeps showing as an update to down;road. Can anyone help. Thanks. Tim
-
BB 9700 bold displays wrong name
a few of our Blackberry's have problems with incoming calls. I don't know how to solve this problem. When we receive an incoming call from f.e. John it appears to be Peter. The name changes to Peter when you take the call. So you think its John but i