Base Amount of CST/VAT with Excise tax code

Hi Experts,
Please tell us the base amount on which CST will triggered in BED+CST combination of TAX CODE.
Regards
Amit Tyagi

Hai!
Wherever BED is coming then exsice should be for its's manufacturing price not for purcahse price.so, use Assessable value as base amount for this combinations.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K

Similar Messages

  • Error while posting A/R Downpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code.

    While posting A/R Dowpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code error of "Unbalanced Transaction" appears. This error does not occur while posting A/R Downpayment Invoices with Non-Excisable Tax Codes.
    Kindly provide a solution for the same.

    SAP Note Number: 1179405
    Error -5002 when trying to copy a document with Sales BOM
    In order to create the delivery via the DI, you need to set the oDoc.Lines.BaseLine value to the LineNum value from the RDR1 table (in the above example you should enter the value 2).
    we set oDoc.Lines.BaseLine=0 before starting the lines loop. This has resolved the issue.
    This note was really helpful and it was found in another query.
    You can also refer to this. https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=19070513&messageID=6178079
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Sadanand Manda on Nov 24, 2008 12:16 PM

  • Error in PO Creation with Excise Tax Code

    Dear
    I am getting the following error while creating a PO (in sandbox) in MM.
    No posting rules exist for account key
    Message no. FF714
    Diagnosis
    No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
    Procedure
    Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B.
    In sand box, I am making use of VS1(Condition Type JMOP)(10%), VS2(Condition Type JAOP)(2%), VS3(Condition Type JSOP)(1%) & JP5 Condition Type JVRD)(4%)Account keys with deductible nature in one tax code V8.   In OB40 GLs are defined.  Posting keys 40 & 50 are given.  In GL master all tax types allowed * is also given.  Also excise data is maintained in the vendor master.
    I am not getting the above error if I make use of any other tax code with only one percentage and one condition type.  I am getting the above error if make use of the above tax code V8 which is created for excise.
    Inputs are hightly solicited.
    Regds

    Check this thread
    [No posting rules exist for account key|No posting rules exist for account key]
    Alternatively, check the following notes which may help you
    =>  Note 27350 - Missing account key
    =>  Note 32828 - Termination with FF714 when posting with FB01
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Issue in MIRO for inventorized excise tax code

    Hi,
      I have created a PO with excise tax code, but the excise amount to be inventorized,
    PO price   : 100
    EXCISE         10
    ECESS          0.20
    SECESS        0.10
    VAT              13.79
    Total net amount   100  and tax amount  24.09
       now as the excise condition are mark as non deductible so after GR the material and GR account are posted with the amount 110.30, base price + excise tax amount which is OK.  But when I am doing the MIRO  I enter the total amount as 124.09  on the miro screen  then selected the tax code as per PO  then material it is showing with amount as 100 insted of 110.30,  because of this it is showing some balance differene , which i need to correct manually.
       Is there any option for this I want to create PO with same procedure with excise tax code which is to be post to inventory  but in MIRO i want to avoid this manual correction.
    regards,
    zafar

    HI,
    But when I am doing the MIRO I enter the total amount as 124.09 on the miro screen then selected the tax code as per PO then material it is showing with amount as 100 insted of 110.30, because of this it is showing some balance difference , which i need to correct manually.
    why 124.09 vat also want to inventories ?
    try this click on calculate tax icon in MIRO and check it 
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Acquisition tax in Belgium/Germany-Posting with different tax codes

    Dear Friends,
    Does anyone have experience working with Acquisition tax in Belgium and German where the goods and services purchased within EU have 21% -input and output tax such that it is ZERO. But still Tax authorities need to see both input and output tax amount with different tax code such as under:
    Expense a/c Dr 100
    Payable a/c Cr 100
    Input VAT a/c Dr 21 - Tax code A1
    Output VAT a/c Cr 21 - Tax code B1
    Any help as to how to post the above entry and how to customize tax code to get the above result and any changes if required in country code tax calculation procedure will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pinky

    Hi Pinky,
    When you define your tax codes, the system defaults certain tax types that have been defined in the system for specific countries. Input tax, output tax, and non-deductible input tax are examples of tax types used in Germany.
    The system determines which tax types are to be displayed by means of the country key. A calculation procedure is specified for each country key, and this procedure contains the country-specific specifications for calculating and posting the different tax types.
    When you define the calculation procedure, you must answer the following questions concerning each tax type:
    What is the base amount for calculating the tax? This can be the expense or revenue amount or, as with sales equalization tax in Belgium, a tax amount.
    Which calculation type is used to determine the base amount: percentage included or percentage separate? With very few exceptions (such as for travel expense accounting in Germany), the base amount is normally determined percentage included.
    The tax amount is 15%.
    Percentage included
    Tax amount = invoice gross amount * (tax rate/100 + tax rate)
    150 = 1150 * ( 15 / 100 + 15)
    Percentage separate
    Tax amount = invoice net gross * tax rate/100
    150 = 1000 * 15 / 100
    To which side of the account must the tax amount be posted? The input and output tax is always posted in accordance with the G/L account and asset line items. For the tax to be posted additionally, the side of the account is determined depending on the input or output tax. For the acquisition and investment tax, for example, you post to the opposite side of the account.
    Should a possible tax expense be divided between the G/L account and asset line items or posted separately? If, for example, you have a non-deductible input tax amount, you can choose whether to post to a separate expense account or apportion the tax expense between the G/L account and asset line items.
    The type of tax calculation and posting depends on the answers to these questions and the combination of those answers.
    The following topics introduce individual tax types and explain the necessary specifications for calculating and posting tax. For more information on the calculation procedure, see The Calculation Procedure.
    See also:
    Tax on Sales/Purchases: Input and Output Tax
    Non-Deductible Input Tax
    Deferred Tax: Italy
    Sales Tax
    Use Tax
    Tax Calculation With or Without Jurisdiction Code?
    Entering Taxes with Jurisdiction Code
    Acquisition Tax
    Investment Tax
    Sales Equalization Tax
    I hope this link will help you
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/e5/077e394acd11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Regards
    Odaiah

  • Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code

    Hi:
    We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     0
    Cess     0
    SECess     0
    Value+Excise     1000
    VAT 5%     50
    ValueExciseVAT     1050
    (Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     100
    Cess     2
    SECess     1
    Value+Excise     1103
    VAT 5%     55.15
    ValueExciseVAT     1158.15
    We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
    24340000     Paper Stock     BSX     1,000.00
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00-
    We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,050.00-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     50.00
    The Material was issued to Cost Centre
    Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
    To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
    24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     1.00
    24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     100.00
    24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     103.00-
    My Question:
    a. Is this the correct way?
    b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,158.15-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI1     100.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     VS9     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI6     1.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     55.15
    Please guide.
    Regards,

    Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
    Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
    The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
    We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
    Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.
    Regards,
    PK

  • Excise Tax Code mandatory in Purchase Request

    Hi Experts
    In Purchase Request or Purchase Order if user chooses Excisable item and Excise Warehouse SAP is not allowing to add without selecting excise Tax code. What is the Purpose of doing this validation at Purchase Request Level. Since user might not aware of tax code. If there any way to by-pass it.
    Regards
    Karunakaran P.

    Hi Joseph
    Thanks for your reply. this may be work around solution but what is the purpose of selecting excise tax code in purchase request.
    One more thing how can we set the default tax code for purchase request document. i have tried following
    1. Tax Code determination
    2. No option for form settings default tax code in purchase request
    3. Tried with user defaults.
    all the above attempts were failed.
    Is there any other possible way to achieve this?
    Regards
    Karunakaran P.

  • Down load MWST records to with the tax code as before

    Hi All,
    I need to make some changes to the MWST tables in respect of a VAT rate increase in Spain due on 1st July.
    I would like to know how to down load MWST records to with the tax code as before?
    Aditya

    Hi Aditya
    You should create a new tax code for the new VAT rate; you should not change the rate for the existing code.  This is because you may need to post/correct transaction for the old rate after the change in rates.
    Data is stored in T683S.  Select where KALSM = your tax procedure, for Spain this will most likely be TAXES

  • P.O. with different Tax codes for each line item.

    Hi
    I would like to know how the IV has been done for the P.O. with differnt tax codes for each line item. Since in MIRO at header level we can select only one tax code.

    Hi
    Raju,
    It means we can post only one invoice at time i.e.for line item same taxcode is there.
    e.g. If line item 10 has tax code A1, 20 has A2 then on header i can only select either A1 or A2 tax code & post invoice of that line item.

  • Error: there are non exicisable item with cenvat tax code

    I am getting an error message there are non exicisable item with cenvat tax code while trying to add po for pick and pack from sales order. I request all of you to help me with it.
    I have already checked if the item and ware house is exicisable in the check box of the master data.
    Best regards,
    Sandesh.Sreyamsh

    Thanks mahendra and rahul,
    Unfortunately my issue is not solved yet, the tax is not manually created it was created by sap during new company creation. I checked by adding other tax type in sales order but every time when I try to create sales bom it gives the above error.
    @ Rahul the tax is under cenvat type and the Items has been added under exercise transaction. here is what im trying to do
    I created a sales order for 4 of my items.
    Then i try to create po for two of my as pick and pack items by checking Purchase orders indicator under logistics tab of sales order.
    At this point i am getting the above said error.
    All the items i am trying to add is exisable and tax is also of cenvat type.
    Please help me out of this as im stuch very badly in this issue.
    Regards,
    Sandesh.Sreyamsh

  • VK12 - disappered %? how to transport the table with new tax codes?

    Hallo
    I'm changing conditions for tax codes in VK12. I have 2 questions:
    1. When I created new entries, the % sign disappears. What shoud I do with this?
    2. Should I create a transport with this changes? Or should I create all new entries with new tax codes manually in all target systems?
    Thanks for all help,
    Megy

    hi,
    normally tax code changes will be done in PRD directly.
    no need to transport
    in VK12, that is change condtion record, you will find the details of condition record right.
    then why are you going to create again.
    change what ever you want to change then and there only and proceed with your requriment.
    regards,
    balajia

  • Issue with document created with a tax code related to a different Company Code

    Hello,
    we need to clear a document created with the tax code "YY" which is associated to the Company Code Espana even if the vendor of this document belongs to the Country Portugal.
    When we try to clear this documents we get the follow error:
    Tax code YY for Country Portugal has been deleted or incorrectly changed
    The problem is the tax code exists but it is associated to Company Code Espana and not to the Portugal one
    In order to cleare this document should we activate the tax code for Portugal, as well?
    Thank You

    Hello, Are you trying to post entry having Plant in Portugal? Thanks, Deepanshu

  • T code  fbl3n  , adding output field is  with hold tax code.

    hai experts ,
    tcode is fbl3n.
    adding new field is  with hold tax code in output fields..
    inpu field is  gl account number and  company code  and psting date.
    but in report bsis table data is come,  but this not properly  assiging to output display structure.
    but i find out some badis like   1.  FI_ITEMS_MENUE01
                                                   2. FI_ITEMS_MENUE02
                                                    3. FI_ITEMS_CH_DATA
                                                   4. BADI_LAYER
    but these badis not working properly.
    but i   develop some implimentation enhancement frame work ,  but inthis point  , cursor  will comes to  enhancement  block but not move step by step code..
    please solve.
    thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    To add new fields in the out put for the transaction FBL3N Use BTE.
    Read the documentation first..
    Go to Tcode FIBF =>Environment=>Info system(P/S)=>F8=>Select the event 00001650=>Click on documentation
    1. Extend the structure RFPOSX and RFPOS with a new append structure.
    2. Run the RFPOSXEXTEND report.
    3. Create BTE 1650 (Business Transaction Event). For this purpose, copy the sample function module SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001650 into the customer namespace.
    4. Activate the module in transaction FIBF. Go to 'Settings -> Products -> ... of a customer' and create a product. You can choose the name of the product and the description. Set the 'Active' indicator and save.
    5. Go to 'Settings -> P/S Modules -> ... of a customer' and include an entry for event 00001650 with your new product and function module. Save the entry.
    Regards
    DKS

  • Restriction of some with holding tax code  when doing F-43

    Dear All,
           How can i restrict previous fiscal year's with holding tax codes while creating a vendor invoice (i.e F-43).
          Its an urgent requirement, i would really appreciate if some one gives the input.
    Thanks
    Suresh

    Dear Rob,
              yeah i know that, but unfortunately i cannot write the validation because the pre-requisite condition requires an entry from WITH_ITEM table, which is not there in the list of structures and tables while writing the validation.
             Please provide the alternate or else let me know how to include the WITH_ITEM table in the list of structures & tables.
    Thanks
    Ravi

  • Unable to  select multiple with holding tax codes. -"This entry already exists in the following tables  '' (ACPR) (ODBC -2035)  [Message 131-183]"

    Unable to  select multiple with holding tax codes.
    This entry already exists in the following tables  '' (ACPR) (ODBC -2035)  [Message 131-183]

    Hi,
    Actually this is an application error in 2007 A and there is no version/PL to fix this issue.
    Refer SAP note 1260874 - Cannot add a new BP with ITW tax code
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

Maybe you are looking for