Best practice standard User Acess Test for WIN2012 AD

What is the Best practice standard User Acess Test for WIN2012 AD

Hello,
as before, add a computer to the domain and log on with a domain user account to the computer.
You should be able from the client machine to open the sharedfolders on the DCseither with:
\\DCName\sysvol
\\DCName\netlogonor \\NetBiosDomainName\sysvol
\\NetBiosDomainName\netlogon
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
MVP, MCP, MCTS
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
Twitter:

Similar Messages

Quick question regarding best practice and dedicating NIC's for traffic seperation.

Hi all,
I have a quick question regarding best practice and dedicating NIC's for traffic seperation for FT, NFS, ISCSI, VM traffic etc. I get that its best practice to try and separate traffic where you can and especially for things like FT however I just wondered if there was a preferred method to achieving this. What I mean is ...
- Is it OK to have everything on one switch but set each respective portgroup to having a primary and failover NIC i.e FT, ISCSI and all the others failover (this would sort of give you a backup in situations where you have limited physical NICs.
- Or should I always aim to separate things entirely with their own respective NICs and their own respective switches?
During the VCAP exam for example (not knowing in advance how many physical NIC's will be available to me) how would I know which stuff I should segregate on its own separate switch? Is there some sort of ranking order of priority /importance? FT for example I would rather not stick on its own dedicated switch if I could only afford to give it a single NICs since this to me seems like a failover risk.

I know the answer to this probably depends on however many physical NICs you have at your disposal however I wondered if there are any golden 100% rules for example FT must absolutely be on its own switch with its own NICs even at the expence of reduced resiliency should the absolute worst happen? Obviously I know its also best practice to seperate NICs by vender and hosts by chassis and switch etc

Any Oracle best practice/standards for inter-DataCente links for Oracle RAC

Hello Oracle Experts,
Am working for a customer to set up Oracle RAC architecture hosting SAP/Non-SAP applications per SLA levels(MC/BC/Standard) specs. Currently my network team needs calculation to arrive at whether we will go for a (1), (2) or (3) 10Gig links for inter DC (Data-Center) for Oracle RAC.. below is additional background:
•     Porting all client SAP/Non-SAP Oracle databases to new 2 data-centers.
•     There will be 10 blades (4x BL680s and 6x BL460s) in each DC (can scale-up/out later on).
•     Clusters architecture to support Extended/Stretched RAC cluster feature
•     Clusters 2-node each(1-datacenter1, 1-datacenter2) and nodes distributed across 2 x c7000 such that no cluster has more than one node in an enclosure.
•     Each node will have - 4 NIC ports ( 2 x public and 2 x private) , 2 dual-port HBA
•     Oracle ASM/ACFS (ASM Cluster File System), Voting Disk, OCR and Database files
•     the versions are Oracle 11g RAC, Oracle 10g RAC and Oracle 9i (for DataGuard/Standby) on RHEL 6 on Proliant Blades (x86) + BladeMatrix
My network colleagues considering using DWDM across the 2 DCs(given the lesser cost?). Am still looking around if there are any Oracle/industry-best practices around this and having a calculation to support that..
Many Thanks in advance..
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi ,
There are no specific set of steps / practices for batch loading contents to ucm . It would be very much dependent on how many contents does the user have to load to UCM and how well the server is configured in terms of performance .
You can get more details from the following documentation link : http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21043_01/doc.1111/e10792/c02_settings009.htm
Thanks,
Srinath

Looking for Some Examples / Best Practices on User Profile Customization in RDS 2012 R2

We're currently running RDS on Windows 2008 R2. We're controlling user's Desktops largely with Group Policy. We're using Folder Redirection to configure their Start Menus as well.
We've installed a Server 2012 R2 RDS box and all the applications that users will need. Should we follow the same customization steps for 2012 R2 that we used in 2012 R2? I would love to see some articles on someone who has customized a user profile/Desktop
in 2012 R2 to see what's possible.
Orange County District Attorney

Hi Sandy,
Here are some related articles below for you:
Easier User Data Management with User Profile Disks in Windows Server 2012
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rds/archive/2012/11/13/easier-user-data-management-with-user-profile-disks-in-windows-server-2012.aspx
User Profile Best Practices
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/15871.user-profile-best-practices.aspx
Since you want to customize user profile, here is another blog for you:
Customizing Default users profile using CopyProfile
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2010/07/28/customizing-default-users-profile-using-copyprofile.aspx
Best Regards,
Amy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]

Best Practice/Standard for Securing and Attaching Files in a Web Service

Thanks in advance.
Being new to Web Services as well as most of my team. I would like to know what is the best practice for transporting files via a Web Service. I know of several methods and one that seems to be the standard, but you can't really tell in this ever changing world of Web Services. Below are the options that I have found.
1. MIME encoded the file and embed in the payload of the SOAP message
2. SwA (SOAP with Attachments) which applies MIME attachments to SOAP. I think this is similiar to the way emails are handled.
3. DIME (Direct Internet Message Encapsulation) similiar to MIME encoding but is more efficient
4. MTOM (Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism) I really not understand this method, but it seems that this is the NEW standard. I just don't understand why.
5. Utilize HTTPS and download the file from an accessible file server w/ a login id and password.
Is there someone out there that understands this problem and can assist me in understanding the pros and cons of these methods? Or maybe there is a method that I'm overlooking altogether.
Thanks

JWSDP supports securing of attachments [1]and will soon support securing MTOM attachments too. [1]http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/2.0/xws-security/ReleaseNotes.html

Toy Store Best Practice: How to implement 'cancel' for register user page

Let's say user wants to register or (even edit) his/her account. But when forwards to register(edit) account page, he/she decides not to do it. I would like to implement 'cancel' button and return the user whereever he/she was before comming to this page.
What is the best practice?
Even worse, if user gets to this page and never saves the entry. The model would be dirty. And then let's say that user wants to commit something in DB, it may commit incorrect(blank) entry for created row. What I am up to, is what is the best practice to keep track if the model gets dirty and delete invalid rows in general?

You might want to read this thread:
Cancel operation followed by refresh raises JBO-33035
(very similar discussion I was having with Steve)

[XI 3.1] BEST PRACTICE method of Oracle connection for RPTs on Linux

Business Objects XI (3.1) - SP3.
Running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux OS.
7,000+ Crystal Reports 2008 *.rpt objects ONLY (No Universe / No WebI).
All reports connecting to Oracle 10g databases.
==================
In the past, all of this infrastructure was running on Windows Server OS and providing the database access via a Named ODBC connection (eg. "APP_DATA".)
This made it easy to manage as all the Report Developers had a standard System DSN called "APP_DATA" which was the same as the System DSN name on all of our DEV, TEST/UAT, and PROD servers for Business Objects.
When we wanted to move/promote a *.rpt file from DEV to PROD we did not have to change any "Database Connection" info as it was all taken care of by pointing the System DSN called "APP_DATA" a a different physical Oracle server at the ODBC level.
Now, that hardware is moving from Windows OS to Red Hat Linux and we are trying to determine the Best Practices (and Pros/Cons) of using one of the three methods below to access the Oracle database for our *.rpts....
1.) Oracle Native connection
2.) ODBC connection
3.) JDBC connection
Here's what we have determined so far -
1a.) Oracle Native connection should be the most efficient method of passing SQL-query to the DB with the fewest issues and best speed [PRO]
1b.) Oracle Native connection may not be supported on Linux - http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/viewtopic.php?t=118770&view=previous&sid=9cca754b468fc67888ab2553c0fbe448 [CON]
1c.) Using Oracle Native would require special-handling on the *.rpts at either the source-file or the CMC level to change them from DEV -> TEST -> PROD connection. This would result in a lot more Developer / Admin overhead than they are currently used to. [CON]
2a.) A 3rd-Party Linux ODBC option may be available from EasySoft - http://www.easysoft.com/products/data_access/odbc_oracle_driver/index.html - which would allow us to use a similar Developer / Admin overhead to what we are used to. [PRO]
2b.) Adding a 3rd-Party Vendor into the mix may lead to support issues is we have problems with results or speeds of our queries. [CON]
3a.) JDBC appears to be the "defacto standard" when running Oracle SQL queries from Linux. [PRO]
3b.) There may be issues with results or speeds of our queries when using JDBC. [CON]
3c.) Using JDBC requires the explicit-IP of the Oracle server to be defined for each connection. This would require special-handling on the *.rpts at either the source-file (and NOT the CMC level) to change them from DEV -> TEST -> PROD connection. This would result in a lot more Developer / Admin overhead than they are currently used to. [CON]
==================
We would appreciate some advice from anyone who has been down this road before.
What were your Best Practices?
What can you add to the Pros and Cons listed above?
How do we find the "sweet spot" between quality/performance/speed of reports and easy-overhead for the Admins and Developers?
As always, thanks in advance for your comments.

Hi,
I just saw this article and I would like to add some infos.
First you can quite easely reproduce the same way of working with the odbc entries by playing with the oracle name resolution on the server. By changing some files (sqlnet, tnsnames.ora,..) you can define a different oracle server for a specific name that will be the same accross all environments.
Database name will be resolved differently regarding to the environment and therefore will access a different database.
Second option is the possibility to change the connection in .rpt files by an automated way like the schedule manager. This tool is a additional web application to deploy that can change the connection settings of rpt reports on thousands of reports in a few clicks. you can find it here :
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/80af7965-8bdf-2b10-fa94-bb21833f3db8
The last option is to do it with a small sdk script, for this purpose, a few lines of codes can change all the reports in a row.
After some implementations on linux to oracle database I would prefer also the native connection. ODBC and JDBC are deprecated ways to connect to database. You can use DATADIRECT connectors that are quite good but for volumes you will see the difference.

Best practice DNS in VPN environment for Lync2013 clients

So I do have those site2site VPNs to connect the small branch offices to the main office. Internal DNS makes sure, that the branch offices can acess all the servers/services in the main office with their domain.local namespace.
In such a scenario will the Lync2013 clients connect through the VPN to the internal sites due to both lyncdiscover and lyncdiscoverinternal being available?
Wouldn't it cause way less burden on the VPN routers if clients would simply go out to the internet and connect from the external side so all the Lync traffic does not have to be stuffed through the VPN pipe? I dont see the point to encrypt the traffice
once more.
Thanks for your suggestions about best practices!
HST

Hi,
When users connect to the corporate network using a VPN client, Lync media traffic is sent through the VPN tunnel. This configuration can create additional latency and jitter because media traffic must pass through an additional layer of encryption and
decryption. The issue is compounded when the VPN concentrator is busy.
If you want to connect Lync server from public network you need to deploy an Edge server.
The solution to force VPN traffic through the Edge Servers must allow external Lync clients connected through VPN, you can refer to the part of "Solution Configuration" in the link below:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/nexthop/archive/2011/11/15/enabling-lync-media-to-bypass-a-vpn-tunnel.aspx
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Best practice using keyword in subject for encryption

I have setup an encryption content filter on my appiance to encrypt messages that are outbound, and have a subject header that begin with the keyword Secure inside brackets. [Secure]. My intent was to eliminate some fals positives by including the brackets. What ended up happening was for some reason ALL outbound messages were being encrypted.
After some more testing it seems like the content filter is ignoring the brackets as a requirement, but I can seem to find anything in the online help to back this up.
Can someone assist with verification of the requirements around using a keywork in the subject to allow users to encrypt oubound messages voluntarily?
Best practices around achieving this if anyone has them would also be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris

Hi Chris,
While I would have to see the syntax of the filter in question to be 100% sure , it sounds as if your conditional variable is being treated literally. The content filters will except regular expressions so what this means is something like [Secure] could be seen as look for anything that contains
an S, or a
e or a
c or a
u or a
r or a
e
Since you said begins with we would be looking for anything in the subject that begins with of of these letters. This is due to the fact that the brackets [ ] are special characters in regular expressions, thus they need to be escaped. That being said [Secure] would become \\[Secure\\], we use the \\ to escape the brackets. In content filters however, you can get by with using just one escape as the filter is smart enough to go ahead an enter the additional escape for you. So in the filter it would be something like begins with \[Secure\]
Once you enter this in the condition for you filter it will display like the following,
subject == "^\\[Secure\\]"
I hope that helps.
Christopher C Smith
CSE
Cisco IronPort Customer Support

OBIEE Best Practice Data Model/Repository Design for Objectives/Targets

Hello World!
We are faced with a design question that has become somewhat difficult and we need some help. We want to be able to compare side-by-side actual measures with their corresponding objectives/targets. Sounds simple. But, our objectives are static (not able to be aggregated) with multi-dimensionality and multi-levels. We need some best practice tips on how to design our data model and repository properly so that we can see the objective/target for a measure regardless of the dimensions that are used in the criteria and regardless of the level.
Here is some more details:
Example of existing objective table.
Dimension1
Dimension2
Dimension3
Obj1
Obj2
Quarter
NULL
NULL
NULL
.99
1.8
1Q13
DIM1VAL1
NULL
NULL
.99
2.4
1Q13
DIM1VAL1
DIM2VAL1
NULL
.98
2.41
1Q13
DIM1VAL1
DIM2VAL1
DIM3VAL1
.97
2.3
1Q13
DIM1VAL1
NULL
DIM3VAL1
.96
1.9
1Q13
NULL
DIM2VAL1
NULL
.97
2.2
1Q13
NULL
DIM2VAL1
DIM3VAL1
.95
2.0
1Q13
NULL
NULL
DIM3VAL1
.94
3.1
1Q13
- Right now we have quarterly objectives set using 3 different dimensions. So, if an author were to add one or more (or zero) dimensions to their criteria for a given measure they could get back a different objective. They could add Dimension1 and get 99%. They could add Dimension1 and Dimension2 and get 98%. They could add all three dimensions and get 97%. They could add zero dimensions (highest grain) and get 99%. Using our existing structure if we were to add a new dimension to the mix the possible combinations would grow dramatically. (Not flexible)
- We would like our final solution to be flexible enough so that we could view objectives with altogether different dimensions and possibly get different objectives.
- We currently have 3 fact tables with 3+ conformed dimension tables and a few unique dimension tables.
Could anyone share a similar situation where you have implemented a data model structure with the proper repository joins to handle showing side-by-side objectives/targets where the objectives were static and could be displayed at differing levels with flexible dimensions as described?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

hi..yes this suggestion is nice...first configure the sensors(activity or variable) ..then configure the sensor action as a JMS Topic which will in turn insert the data into a DB..Or when u configure the sensor action as a DB..then the data goes to Oracle Reports schema..if there is any chance of altering the DB..i mean if there is any chance by changing config files so that the data doesnt go to that Reports schema and goes to a custom schema created by any User....i dont know if it can b done...my problem is wen i m configuring the jms Topic for sensor actions..i see blank data coming..for sm reason or the other the data is not getting posted ...i have used a esb ..a routing service based on the schema which i am monitoring...can any1 help?

Best Practice while configuring Traffic Manager for Azure Website

Hi Team,
I want to understand What is the best practice while we configure traffic manager for Azure website.
To give you the base, Here let me explain my requirement. I have one website which 40% target audiences would be East US, while 40% would be UK and rest 20% would be from Asia-pacific.
Now, What I want is Failover + Performance based Traffic Manager Configuration.
My thinking:
1) we need to create 1 website with 2 instances in each region (east us, east asia, west us for an example). so, total 3 deployment of website. (give region based url for the website)
2) create traffic manager based on performance and add 3 of those instances. that would become website-tmonperformance
3) create traffic manager based on failover and add 3 of those instances. that would become website-tmonfailover
4) create traffic manager and ?? don't know the criteria but add both above traffic manager here and take your final url for end user.
I am not sure (1) this may be the right approach or not (2) if this is right, in the 4th step which criteria we should select while creating final traffic manager round-robin/ performance/ failover?
after all these if use try to access site from US.. traffic manager will divert that to US Data-Centre or it will wait for failover and till that it will be served from east-asia if in configuration, east-asia is my 1st instance?
Regards, Brijesh Shah

Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for your quick reply. actually question is bit different. Let me explain you different way.
I was asking for recommendation from Azure Traffic Manager team. whether my understanding is correct or not.We want Performance with Failover.
So, One azure website we have: take an example todoapp. I deployed that in 3 different region. now, I want to have performance based routing as well as failover based routing. but obviously I can't give two URL to my end user. so, at the top of that I will
require one more traffic manager. So,
step 1: I will create one traffic manager with performance criteria named: TMForPerformance.trafficmanager.com where I will add all those 3 instances (all are from different region so, it want create any issue.)
step 2: I will create one more traffic manager with failover criteria named: TMForFailover.trafficmanager.com where I will add all those 3 instances (all are from different region so, it want create any issue.)
step 3: I will create one final traffic manager with performance criteria named: todoapp.trafficmanager.com where I will add these two traffic manager instead of 3 different region's website.
Question 1) Is it correct structure if we want to achieve Performance with Failover or Is there any better solution?
Question 2) in step 3, what criteria we should select? performance/ round robin/ failover
Regards, Brijesh Shah

Best practice: Using break statement inside for loop

Hi All,
Using break statment inside FOR loop is a best practice or not?
I have given some sample code:
1. With break statement
2. With some boolean variable that decide whether to come out of the loop or not.
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++){
if(i == 5){
break;
boolean breakForLoop = false;
for(int i = 0; i < 10 && !breakForLoop; i++){
if(i == 5){
breakForLoop = true;
The example may be a stupid one. But i want to know which one is good?
Thanks and Regards,
Ashok kumar B.

Actually, it's bad practice to use break anywhere other than in conjunction with a switch statement.Presumably, if you favour:
boolean test = true;
while (test)
test = foo && bar;
if (test)
}overfor (;;)
if (! ( foo && bar) ) break;
}then you also favour
boolean test = foo && bar;
if (test)
}overif (foo && bar)
}Or can you justify your statement with any example which doesn't cause more complexity, more variables in scope, and multiple assignments and tests?

Best Practice / Standards to design a Scorecard in PL-SQL

I am attempting to put together a Scorecard for my client who wants to track set of employees with different job role and title. Basically he identified several cetegories, criteria under those categories that he wants to score them by set weightages
Example
Category 1
Productivity
Category Weightage
80%
Criteria
WorkTypeA Weightage 25%
WorkTypeB Weightage 25%
WorkTypeB Weightage 25%
WorkTypeB Weightage 25%
Category 2
Quality
Category Weightage
20%
Criteria
Quality Type 1 50%
Quality Type 2 50%
He wants to rank each employee and rate then on a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being best. He also wants to rank by Role and Title as well
My question...is there a standard methodology/template to design this in pl-sql? I can put something together but I have a feeling there should be existing best practice on this kind of scorecard design. Any ideas?
Buzzer
Message was edited by:
vinny75

Hi
Thanks for the response. I dont have any model yet. All I have at this time, is a set of main categories, criteria under the category, weightage at the category level and criteria level. The Criteria they want to weigh on, is located in the datamart.
I guess I could build a pl-sql packaged routine using the Analytic functions and start building snapshot tables holding the score.
Is this how scorecard work is done?

Best Practice: A J2EE Blue-Print for a Typical Web App

Consider a typical synchronous Struts-based Web application which does a simple DB search and post. What are some of the main patterns and components that should be used if following the �industry best practices�
Does the following flow seem accurate?
Strust Action creates a TransferObject , and passes it to a Business Delegate. Delegate finds the appropriate BusinessObject, the Business Object uses the Data Access Object�.the CRUD operation happens and the result is sent back to the Action in the same TransferObject.
Which one of these components need an interface?
What's the best way for this components to interact with each other (factory, etc.)?
Message was edited by:
kmkiani
Message was edited by:
kmkiani

There are 3 tiers in a Java EE application. (Presentation, Business, Integration).
The BusinessDelegate in this scenario would be a Presentation-tier business delegate. This guy would interact with a Session Facade who lives on the Business-tier. The SessionFacade is the abstraction on the Business-tier and the Business Delegate is the abstraction on the Presentation-tier. It is these guys that have direct communication. This design enables low coupling between the actual implementations of each area. If done properly, you could go from EJB to Web Service to POJO business models without ever having to change anything in the Presentation-tier.
These object-oriented design patterns are primarily for Enterprise applications with extensive Quality-of-Service requirements.
In your scenario, the Presentation-tier would contain a MVC-based web application, i.e. Struts. The business model and business/domain requirements would be implemented in the Business-tier.
Presentation Tier - Struts Web Application
Business Tier - (EJB | POJO | WEB SERVICES) Application
Integration Tier - (Relational Database | File System | XML Database | EIS)

Best practice to use Time capsule for back-up of 3 different products (MBP 15 OSX lion, MBP 13 OSX lion and MBA 13 OSX mountain lion)?. Only the MBP15 is back-up regularly.

When I want to save data of the MBA13 on mountain lion (wireless) with time capsule, hois there any best practice to perform?
After that, assuming that data are back-up, can we easily differentiate data in time capsule belonging to MBP15/13 and MBA13?

Unfortunately, Apple left off the Ethernet port....the most important port in networking....on the MBA, so your first backup of the entire Mac will need to be done using wireless.
That may take a day or two unless your MBA has a Thunderbolt port on it in which case you could add a Thunderbolt to Ethernet adapter and connect the MBA to the Time Capsule for the first backup using an Ethernet cable. It will probably only take 3-4 hours or less doing it this way.
Once you have the first complete backup done, other subsequent backups can be done using wireless since they will ony take a few minutes, on average.
Both Macs will backup to the Time Capsule using Time Machine automatically. Backups will be kept completely separate, so one Mac will normally only be able to "see" its own backups.

Best practice standard User Acess Test for WIN2012 AD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for