Best Video Card for non 3d/compositing work in Premiere CS4?

Hi all, I'm looking to optimize my system where I can to speed up the editing process. I edit 1080p footage from the Canon 5D MKII (h.264 MOV files)using half-res h.264 proxies, but CS4 seems to hang a lot in the timeline view and clips just disappear and instead show green. I'm switching to half-res MPEG-2 (.m2v) proxies now and so far that problem seems to have gone away (still testing), but when timeline display quality is at "High Quality" (vs. automatic) there's still some chop during slow pans (not seen with "Automatic" or "Draft Quality").
Anyway, I'm looking for the weakest point in my system and suspect the video card. My system is an 2.66 i7 processor, 6GB 1333 ram, 1x160GB sata II HD (OS/Apps), 3x1TB SATA II RAID 0 (paging file, data), and an $80 ATI 4650 512 MB video card running Vista 64.
So all that said, what's the best general graphics card for editing HD video in Premiere CS4? I don't care about 3d or compositing at this stage, just basic editing of unrendered (timeline playback) HD video, maybe sometimes 1-3 HD layers, some basic color correction effects (b+w, contrast, etc), dissolves, text overlay, some clip speed manipulation.
Many seem to recommend the Nvidia quadro cards, but I haven't found any information to suggest they help with anything other than 3D/compositing, which I don't need (and therefore don't need to pay the premium).
There's also the Nvidia CX card, but it's main feature is touted as encoding h.264, whereas I could care less about that and ideally need decoding of h.264 in the timeline to be better. I haven't seen any great reviews on this card of heard of average user testimonials, probably because it's $2k and it mainly marketed as "zoom more fluidly in photoshop, export h.264 4x faster", which seem like minor issues vs. "better realtime playback of HD video".
I sort of rambled, but if any informed CS4 users can help answer the question regarding the best video card for general CS4 editing use (not 3d/compositing stuff) I'd love to get more insight.

So in Media Encoder CS4, I tried encoding one of the clips that plays back the least smooth in the Premiere timeline (a slow pan across intricate patterns on a sand dune in death valley) to the following:
Format: P2 Movie, Preset: DVCPRO HD 720P 30
(this was the only format in media encoder that mentions DVCPRO HD)
I noticed when trying to customize the setting, that there is no 30 fps option, just 23.976, 29.97, and 59.94. I just went with 29.97 as that was the closest to the 30 fps of the source MK II footage. The width and height were also unajustable at 960x720 for the DVCPRO HD format.
Playing the output in the timeline view of Premiere was comparable in smoothness to the m2v file. I looked at my resource monitor during playback looking for bottlenecks, and the CPU does seem to spike at 100% initially when playing this clip back. I reverted to the m2v version and also saw the same CPU spike. I also reverted back to the down-res'd mp4 version, same spike. Moving display quality down to draft does allow for smooth playback here.
So I guess there's something about this clip that is CPU intensive to play back in the timeline in any of these formats. The original 1080p version plays back perfectly in both quicktime and VLC player.
Anyway, for now I think I'm content with using the m2v proxies as a big chunk of the clips are fairly smooth, and using a reduced quality display mode for clips that don't play as smoothly is accpeptable for now. At least so far I'm not seeing the hanging/video not displaying (and instead showing a green screen) that I was with the mp4 proxies.
If anyone has any other suggestions as to how to get smoother timeline playback for these proxies (or the original h.264 .MOV files), however, whether it be a hardware upgrade (e.g. better video card) or a different proxy codec, I'd love to hear them and give it a shot.

Similar Messages

  • Best video card for Archlinux?

    What is the best video card for Archlinux distribution?
    Is it possible to make Radeon HD 4870 work somehow in Archlinux, the same way like it works in Ubuntu?

    Just see what drivers are you using with your ubuntu install? Catalyst/xf86-video-ati/radeonhd and install the same on arch.

  • What is the best video card for 3D?

    I'm getting a 2008 Mac Pro, will equip it with 10GB of RAM. What is the best video card for 3D rendering? I've read that the stock ATI 2600 card is woefully inadequate. I've also read that the NVIDIA 8800 card is better for gaming, and has caused some problems anyway. I can't spring for the top-end Quadra card that Apple offers. Are there good, cost-effective options for 3D work? Can I even get a video card on the open market that is not flashed by Apple?

    Basically there are only three options available:
    1. ATI 2600
    2. ATI 1900
    3. NVidia 8800
    The latter is the best of the three. See benchmark results at Bare Feats.
    You cannot use a video card not provided by Apple because they will not work with OS X or the hardware.

  • Best video card for my mac

    Hey,
    I just need help finding the best video card for my Powermac g4 fw800. One that my system can use fully. I currently have a Radeon 9000Pro with 64MB. Thanks
    ~R

    Hi
    The ATI 9800-256MB is currently the best card for your system. Actually, there are no other NEW video cards available.
    BTW, xlr8yourmac hasn't done a video card review in years, they are just a bulletin board/newsletter now. If you are interested in seeing current testing of available video cards, check out:
    http://www.barefeats.com/rad98pro.html
    Regards,
    Dave

  • Best video card for G4 tower?

    What's the best video card for my G4 tower without breaking the bank?
    I have the dual 500nhz, 2GB ram, OSX 10.4.
    I currently have a nVidia Gforce64mb with a small fan.

    No you're OK...
    There is DVI-I, DVD-D, & DVI-A, DVI-I contains both DVI-A & DVI-D, HDMI uses DVD-D, (Digital), so it can connect to DVI-I or DVD-D.
    Those 4 holes are only used for DVI-A, (analog).

  • Best Video Card for Editing and Rendering?

    I bet this topic has been discussed at length, but doing a search for "best video card" did not give me the results I need. I am working with the latest version of Magic Bullet Movie Looks and started to notice artifacts in rendered video; flashes, black/white lines and complete boxes in the final frame. I contacted Red Giant, and they informed me my Quadro FX 1500 is not a "supported" card and is most likely the cause of these artifacts. Strange, as Movie Looks had Quadro FX 1300 and up as listed on their web site as compatible - but I digress. My question is, what video card do YOU like for PPRO CS3 AND AE? Movie Looks, like many other programs, rely on the video GPU to render their output - what has been fastest for you, and NOT caused issues with the rest of the system? I use video overlay (as part of Nvidia's Dual View) to edit the Program ouput on a separate monitor and also need this functionality as well - can't live without it! Thanks for your answers.
    System Specs:
    Dual core Dual processor Woodcrest
    6GB RAM
    2 TB RAID HD
    Current Card: PNY NVidia Quadro FX 1500

    Well, if you go to Adobe's hardware compatibility page is does list the 7800 as being fully supported:
    http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/search_result.html?manuSearchVar=1&modelSearchVar=0 &supportSearchVar=0&brand=&dataFormat=&version=CS3&device=graphic&format=
    but the 8800 series cards are also listed, which will support CUDA once it becomes widely used. CUDA is rumored to be utilized with CS4 which will speed up render and preview times drastically by utilizing the GPU as well as the CPU rather than mostly the CPU only.
    http://insidehpc.com/2006/11/10/what-is-cuda/
    This could still be a year or two away, so if you think you may upgrade your video card again before that time, you may want to stick with the 7800 for now.

  • Best Video Card for the G5?

    What's the best Video Card I can put in my G5?
    Currently I've got a:
    Mac Dual 2.7 GHz PowerPC G5, w/4GB DDR SDRAM, and 256 MB total of VRAM. The existing graphics card is the: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT DDL
    Thanks!
    Matt

    Hi,
    If you haven't noticed, there are only two choices available from Apple. The nvidia 6600 (slower than yours) and the ATI X800 (similar to yours).
    There is a place that flashes Nvidia 7800's from PC to Mac, I installed one the other day and it works perfect in a Quad.
    In addition, there was a contract signed last month between XFX and Apple for upgrade video cards for Mac G4's and G5's. It was reported that this merchandise may be available by Summer (nothing definite).
    Regards,
    Dave

  • TS1935 I have the video card model . What is the best video card for a 1.6GHz PowerPC G5 please?

    Hello
    What is the best (most modern and reliable) video card (AGP) which will work in a 1.6GHz PowerPC G5 (mid 2003)?
    I believe I have ATY,RV350, and according to the attached article, it may be causing video start up problems.
    Thank you
    Adam

    Hi Adam,
    See japamacs page here on the best AGP cards for G4s & G5s...
    http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/Blog/4B4B7BA2-7ABB-47F1-87AC-B03D379 42BEE.html
    Rated slowest on top, fastest on bottom.
    Though with no power loght & such, I'm not sure that is the problem or not... does the Hard drive(s) spin up?

  • Best video card for Aperture

    Hi
    Which is for you the best video card built for Macpro to use with Aperture, excluding the1,5GB card from Apple store?
    The 8800GT 512 is great one?
    I think I'll use in future with an Apple cinema display 23".
    Thanks
    Koferc

    Barefeats seems to like the Radeon HD 3870 Mac for the Mac Pros. I ordered my MP with the 8800 GT upgrade, but as steebow posted above it appears the ATI has better drivers, so that the 3870 upgrade seems to be the way to go. Aperture was not tested, but in other Core Image tests it seems to do better on the 3870:
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper16.html
    Here's a recent test of 10.55 compared to 10.5.4 for the two cards as well:
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper20.html
    The 3870 is available at OWC for $217.99:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/ATI%20Technologies/100435928/

  • Best video card for a Power Mac G5 Dual 1.8 GHz

    What is the best video card I can upgrade to with my Power Mac G5 Dual 1.8 GHz?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Hi-
    The best is probably the one that you can find..... getting hard to find Mac 8x AGP cards.....
    Best OEM cards are (were) Radeon 850XT, Radeon X800XT, Geforce 6800 Ultra and Geforce 6800 GT, in order from fastest.
    X800 vs. others
    Now, most options are the above, used, or, flashed PC cards. PC cards include the above, but have one faster than even the X850XT- the Geforce 7800 GS.
    7800 GS in a G5

  • Best bang-for-buck video card for hi-end Photoshop work..?

    When I bought my rig 3 or 4 years ago, I was told that when it comes to 2D performance, all modern video cards are created equal. That the price differences really only affect the 3D side of things.
    So I bought a NVIDIA GeForce GT 240.
    Why this thing has a fan, I have no idea. Like I said, even when I bought it it was considered "bottom-of-the-heap". Anyhoo, long story short, the fan died on me a couple of days ago. I can now keep the card from overheating through a house fan pointed at the open case. Naturally, I can't keep this going forever. I need to buy a new card.
    The good news is that I don't need ANY 3D performance (unless vector logos count). I only use my computer for hi-res Photoshop work (at 1920x1200+ resolution with PSD files that sometimes reach 5 or 6GB) and full-screen video playback. No games are being played on this rig whatsoever.
    The bad news, however, is that money is an issue. I can't just go buy the latest $300 card, especially not to put on a 3 or 4 year old rig. The Core i7 920 CPU and 10GB of ram (on Windows 7 64) will keep me going for a couple of years more, but I don't expect to still be using this rig much further beyond that.
    I just want to keep using my Adobe suite and play movies in hi-res on this thing. That's it.
    I've been told to look into the NVIDIA Quadro series, but that appears to me out of my price range. I'd like to keep it under $150. Or even $100 if at all possible. Other cards quoted to me are the GT630 and R7-250 (which is apparently a rebranded Radeon HD 7770).
    What would you guys recommend that would be the best bang for my buck in this scenario? I'd hope most of today's cards - even the cheapest ones - are at least a step up from the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240. Right?
    If anyone has any advice...

    Trevor Dennis wrote:
    There was an article on Tom's Hardware yesterday, announcing that nVidia are stopping driver support for it's older cards.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-eol-graphics-card,26304.html
    This goes back to the 300 range and earlier cards, but also includes the Geforce 405 from the 400 range.
    Be that as it may, my GT 240 is still being listed as supported in last week's 335.23 driver release. And that's the driver that fried it. This "1 driver for all our cards" thing is really for the birds. There's no way for product owners to know what the latest, safest driver for their card is. I don't think NVIDIA thought this thing through when they announced they'd be going with a "single driver for all" model.
    I don't think NVIDIA realizes what a huge potential lawsuit could be headed their way from other owners like myself (but not me, I'm not very letigious) who saw their cards get physically damaged by drivers that were supposed to be compatible with them.
    I see you recommending I stay under $100, which was my original plan, but then you said I should definitely get a Quadro. When I checked, Quadro cards were more expensive than the GeForce line. Did I misunderstand? Were you saying NOT to touch the Quadros?
    On other forums, they tell me to push for the new GTX 750, swearing its 2D performance makes it worth the price, despite the fact that it's clearly a GAMING card, and I don't game.
    I'm so confused.

  • Top two best video cards for older Mac Pros?

    I have some older Mac Pro towers that vary from:
    2.66 GHz Quad Core Intel Xeon
    ..to this:
    2 x 2.93 GHz 6 Core Intel Xeon
    Looking for at least the top two video cards that are tried and tested that would work best with at least Premiere Pro and AME. I just need to narrow down the unwieldy list that can be found here: http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/tech-specs.html

    MikeJamesG wrote:
    Looking for at least the top two video cards that are tried and tested that would work best with at least Premiere Pro and AME.
    Are you adverse to using aftermarket cards that have been converted to work properly in a Mac?  If you aren't, then I'd recommend talking to Dave @ MacVidCards because he can cook you up an nVidia 700-series card that will boot properly in a Mac Pro, run at PCI-E 2.0 speeds, and work wonderfully in Pr/AME.

  • Best Video Card for my MDD Dual 1.25 and Video Editing?

    I know that this has been discussed several times before. I just never saw any real answers. I was planning to a little more intensive video editing so I got the Motion 2.1 Trial. Well, doens't allow me to install saying that my video card doesn't meet the specs. I'm confused, I read the requirements and read me files and my ATI Radeon 9800 Pro seems to meet the basic requirements. However, the About this Mac says that it doens't support Core Image.
    I guess my question is what would be my best and least expensive video card upgrade? Or is mine set up incorrectly or something? I've read elsewhere that this card should work. I'm just a little confused why it doesn't support Core Image....I may go all the way to Final Cut...Will this card work with that application?
    Any info would be great.
    Thanks.
    Robert

    Thanks and sorry for the confusion...I just realized
    that mine is only a 64mb card. It's the stock that
    came originally in the MDD dual 1.25 I believe. I
    had no idea that the same model card can have
    different amounts of memory. It still says that it's
    the ATI Radeon 9800 Pro...just 64mb and no core image
    support
    It sounds like you may be mistaken and have an Apple OEM ATI RADEON 9000 Pro. That had 64MB, was stock with the MDD, and does not support core image.
    There was also an Apple OEM ATI RADEON 9700 Pro with 128MB available as a BTO option with the MDD Dual 1.42GHz. Sometimes they pop up on eBay, although they are sought-after because they support core image and have both an ACD and DVI connection allowing for two digitally-connected LCD flat-panel monitors.
    To my knowledge there have only been 128MB and 256MB versions of the ATI RADEON 9800 Pro Mac Edition.
    PowerMac G4 MDD Dual 1.25GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.10)  

  • WHAT IS THE BEST VIDEO CARD FOR FINAL CUT PRO and MOTION?

    Hello folks,
    I have found a lot of posts regarding all kinds of troubles with ATI READEON X1900 video card.
    When I talked to people from Apple, trying to decide which videocard to install in new MAC PRO, Ati Radeon X1900 was the one they did recommand for FCP and Motion. So are there any other cards which would actually suite better for Final Cut Studio2, or is Ati Radeon X1900 really the one to go with?
    Thanks for any suggestions,
    Kootenay

    Techreport has some more information on the new 55nm Radeon (X3000) which should be another "mid November" releases, as well as an updated 8800 GT that still is under wraps.
    So seems Intel and everyone else is trying to get new products out before the end of the year, if possible.
    Drivers for graphics controllers may or may not need the work that sometimes seems to plague companies.

  • What's the best video card for both Premiere and AE on an iMac?

    I remember seeing that one card works great with Premiere but then AE doesn't like it as much for 3D.
    I have Premiere CC but only CS5 for AE. I might subscribe to AE CC if it's worth it.

    We love it when people want us to guess what video card and other items you have .... price is no object of course right.... and you want CUDA? so that means a GTX this time instead of what you have (5770 upgrade? no, the original 2600XT that really should have been ditched long ago).
    Yosemite also makes more demands on the GPU.
    The GTX 680 Mac Edition EVGA would be the first, though people are using even newer graphic cards in the Nvidia line.
    New Nvidia GTX 970 and 980 - cMP?  (  1 2 3 4 5 6)

Maybe you are looking for