Best way to split a site in two?

I have a site I am revising. The site and its subfolders are located like this
Macintosh HD
......Business folder
.........Mysitename.site
.........Mysitename.settings
.........Mysitename.data
Is that as it should be? Seems so but prefer to ask and be sure.
After revising, I plan to split the site into two sites. I suppose the best way to do that is to hit Save As... Is that in fact the best way? What happens then to the .data and .settings folders? Do they copy properly? Do they end up in the right place?
And last:
In each version, I plan to delete some pages so there are now two related sites, each with its own similar but not matching collection of pages. Can I simply, in each version, delete one page at a time? 
My best guess is, after deleting pages, I should recheck links with command-5 the Links In /Out palette. Is that the best way?
Thanks.

Larry,
If I understand it in the right way, you can do as you plan. You may, outside GoLive:
1) Create a new folder (like Business 2 folder) and copy everything from inside Business folder into it;
2) In each folder (Business/Business 2), delete and/or add things as needed;
Then you may open GoLive, open each of the site files, press the Refresh button, and recheck links.

Similar Messages

  • Best way to split large partition in multiple small partitions

    Looking for some ideas here. We ended up having a large/huge partition, the last one (because of maxvalue), while other partitions have similar number of records. What's the best way to split this large partitions with has about 3 years worth of data into separate partitions based on Month/Year. I tried with SPLIT partition, I not able to figure out a way to specify a value where I can like to split.
    Any thoughts, ideas appreciated.
    Thanks

    I'd be inclined to split off that partition as a stand-alone table. Create new partitions and then reload the data. But that "inclined" would depend on the available maintenance window and the amount of data and the Oracle version number none of which you mention.

  • Best way to split 3D project with constantly moving cameras

    I created a 1 minute project in which the camera travels between 3 sets, while there is an animated 2D background. The background consists of overlaying .psd files which move around. The camera sweeps each set and then zooms to the next. Within each set are .mov and .psd files with tons of keyframing (although not too many filters). I think I'm starting to hit the outer limits of my hardware. I have it set to render draft quality for now, and it's still functional. I'm wondering what would be the best way to split it into smaller files, yet retain smooth motion of the camera between sets? I still need to fine tune the duration of each set, so I'm a little hesitant to break it up a this point, but may need to do so anyway. Thanks in advance.

    Ok, I did it. Project complete. It turned out that I did have enough RAM, just not enough to RAM preview it all. I did flatten quite a bit of it prior to the camera moves. And an additional challenge was when I wanted to add a 5 second clip at the beginning. I wound up adding a second camera because all my timing was thrown off.
    Anyway, here's a link to the final video.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McBqVzrejNw
    Hey Bogie, I was thinking of starting a separate thread in the FCP or Compressor forums with recommended encodes for getting this monster of a file on the web. I tried several iterations and finally found one that both looked good, was big enough to watch, and small enough to load quickly. Does it make sense to start a new thread for which I already have the answer?

  • Best way to split a single string containing 2 words into word1 and word2

    Whats the best way to take a string containing 2 words and split it into 2 strings ?
    eg. "red ferrari"
    string1 "red"
    string2 "ferrari"

    If your list is always going to have exactly two words, then yes.  Otherwise it depends on your requierments.

  • Best way to split Aperture Library

    This is my current setup:
    Aperture 3 running on my Macbook Pro with referenced masters. Both library and masters reside on the 500GB macbook. HD space is starting to get a bit tight and now I would like to split the library into 2 (by years probably, haven't decided) and put one library (the least used) on my iMac and continue to use the MB as the primary workstation.
    What is the best way to do this split? I know I can export as a new library in A3 and have it consolidate masters into library. I'm assuming when I do this consolidation it just copies the masters to the new library. This would not solve my HD space issue as the original referenced masters would still reside on my MB.
    Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks

    Based on what you said so far, still the best option is an external HD. You do not need to take the HD with you every place you go. When you are mobile, tell Aperture to Store Files in Aperture library as you do now. When you return, tell Aperture to Relocate Masters. It's job done. You will free up a lot of HD space and with a Referenced Masters set up you should see some performance improvements. Allan
    PS you have two Allan's trying to assist.

  • Splitting one site into two

    I have one large site which has two distinct sections. Each section has multiple pages. I have two domain names.
    I would like to split the site by removing one of the sections and making a new site with these pages.
    I imagine it is not difficult, but could not locate this in a search.
    Thank you.
    asuch

    asuch:
    It's very easy to do. Create a new site and drag the pages from site 1 to site 2. Somewhat the opposite as shown here.
    OT

  • Interesting experience splitting domain.sites into two sites

    Just thought I would share this interesting experience...
    I have a whole bunch of separate .sites files. (I use iWebSites to do this) I publish them all to .mac but without any difficulty, overwriting, etc. but keep them separate just for ease of use in iWeb.
    I had a .sites file with two websites in it that I wanted to split into separate .sites files. I duplicated the .sites file and opened each one up in iWeb and deleted "half." Then I made a change on one of them and published it. The other "half" disappeaered online!!! I opened the other one and republished and the first one disappeared.
    I was able to rename one of them and the problem was eliminated. But I thought this was interesting! When advising people on how to split domain.sites, keep this in mind!

    I took the suggestion from this thread (thanks to JAMES and VARKGIRL) to upload more sites into .Mac, keeping them in separate domain files.
    It works: the only downside is that iWeb will put as FIRST SITE (reachable when you enter http://web.mac.com/"yourlogin") the first "site" of the last domain file you create.
    If the first site appearing when using your "basic" URL is important to you, you can solve this by copying/re-creating the same first "site" in all of your new domain files.
    I did that with mine (http://web.mac.com/luigi.adami/) and it worked.
    I now have two domain files containing the sites:
    web.mac.com/luigi.adami/FANFIC/home/
    web.mac.com/luigi.adami/RPS/home/
    As I wanted to split my original domain file in smaller ones, the problem remains, though.
    In fact, the idea of splitting the site by duplicating/deleting/republishing has only sense if you have a small site. Mine is over 250 MB and it would be a nightmare to republish every single part. It would make more sense to delete the various reduntant parts after having duplicated the original files and then prevent iWeb from updating (t.i. deleting) the site.
    I knew there was a prepublishstate.plist file you could delete to do that but I cannot find it anymore (was it removed after one of the last iWeb updates?).
    If I was able to make iWeb believe there is nothing to update, the trick explained in this thread would really work.
    Any idea?

  • The best way to check the differences between two lists? Or substracting

    Hi,
    I am Googling on this and find many different answers and I am not sure what the best approach is. I have two lists:
    List A: with 10000 entries (String with length 6 all of them)
    List B: with 10002 entries (String with length 6 all of them)
    List A and B are almost identical but with 2 differences. I want to find these two differences or in other words generating a third list, List C with these 2 differences.
    What is the best way to approach? To us Array, ArrayList, Vectors, Hashmap, Hashtable...
    Thank you for any hunches

    Maria1990 wrote:
    I think I found the easiest approach...
    listA = [a, b, c];
    listB = [a, b];
    listC = listA.removeAll(listB);
    ...but if it is the best approach with performance in mind.. I have no idea...It really depends on what sort of comparison you want. Lists allow duplicate elements, Sets do not; so a comparison of Sets based on the contents of your Lists would only return distinct element differences.
    My suggestion: sort both lists and do a "staircase" comparison. That is (assuming they're both in ascending order):
    1. Read through both until you find a mismatch.
    2. Read through the one containing the "lesser" element, until you find a match, or until it's exhausted.
    3. If you find a match, go back to 1.
    4. If you exhaust one list, then any remaining elements in the other are also "mismatches".
    HIH
    Winston
    PS: With this approach, you can also flag your mismatches as "A not in B" or "B not in A".
    Edited by: YoungWinston on Jul 27, 2010 4:24 AM

  • Best way to split itunes account?

    So I have just graduated from high school and I am moving onto college in the fall. Me and my sister have shared an itunes account for forever (mainly PC used) now but since I just got a macbook for college I am looking for and easy way to split these accounts so that she has her own. My original idea was to make her her own under her own e-mail and import all of our shared music from a back up, similar to importing a cd. Then I would import the songs to my mac book (older purchases and songs off CDs not downloadable through cloud). at this point I could go through and delete any of her songs that I didn't want and she could do the same. this would give us our own libraries and the new downloads would come to each separate account based on the purchaser. I am almost positive that this is the best way to do this but if anyone has any input, tips or completely separate suggestions I would love to hear them.

    cjover94 wrote:
    My only question is if these songs are burned to a USB storage device wont they be able to be burnt to her account
    but wont they still be transferred to her new account?
    They can be used in her iTunes library (on a computer) but they will always be part of your iTunes account (used to make purchases).

  • Best way to share iTunes library with two user accounts?

    I have a single iTunes library on my Macbook Pro.  I would like to share between to user accounts, each with Apple ID's.  What's the best way to do so?  Right now, I've given the second user rights to read/write to the first users "Music" folder.  But when one user adds song files, the other must "Add Folder" in order to see the new purchases.  It's kind of putsy.  Is there a better way?  Thanks!

    Hello again,
    Have the iTunes Library located in the Shared Folder for instance and then launch iTunes in both users while holding option (or alt) on your keyboard. Choose the iTunes library file wherever it may be located. You can keep it in the same spot if you want (i.e. your Music folder). Many people have their's on a local network hard drive and do this.
    The benefit is that when one user updates the iTunes library file, the next user will open an updated version that has all songs that the other user added.
    Since you have one computer shared, this should be fine. I am unsure what happens when multiple computers/users access the library file at the same time.

  • Best way to "split" iPhoto library?

    Usually, at the beginning of the year I create a new, clean library for iPhoto. This helps me keep my library size managable. Well, this year I forgot to do it and now my iPhoto library contains pictures from 07 and 08. Is there an easy way to split my iPhoto library? How do I create a new library with my 08 pictures? There must be a way to do it. I know what events I want to move to a new library I'm just not sure how to go about doing it.

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
    iPhoto Library Manager will copy Events and well as Albums, for further information consult the Help on the app or contact the Developer.
    I have an external network drive to store the libraries so I also want to experiment with sharing those libraries with my wife
    Users have consistently reported problems when using a disk not formatted for OS X (such as a NAS) with iPhoto. These issues include problems sharing, problems saving changes and others. I would not recommend using iPhoto on any disk not formatted for OS X.
    Regards
    TD

  • Best way to move a site between farms running different versions of SharePoint.

    I will try and keep this short and summarize what we are trying to do to see if I am on the right track. I am at a new job and trying to clean up stuff that has collected over the years. I might be making this more difficult than necessary and looking for
    the easiest way to accomplish the goal which is:
    There is a team here that had a SharePoint 2007 WSS environment built for them years ago that they have been using and have a lot of historical data that they want to keep. It contains several (8) Sites in a single Site Collection. The sites are all very
    basic using out of the box web parts(Lists and Libraries). Nothing custom and security very basic (can be recreated if needed) which is all good. We want to consolidate this farm as it is the only thing on the farm and move it to our Intranet (running SharePoint
    2010 Enterprise). On the intranet we have a Managed Path configured for "Teams" which this site collection would fall nicely into based on usage policy and existing Governance. I am fine with them having their own Site Collection Database separate
    from what the other site collections that already exist. All of this really doesn't sound like it will be too hard. However I don't want to run out and buy any migration tools as it is just this one site that is moving and I should be able to do this with
    out of the box tools/powershell.
    Gotchas - 2007 WSS was on SP0. I just got done upgrading the 2007 environment to SP3. I think I needed to be at least up to SP2 but since I was upgrading them anyhow I went up to SP3. Intranet is running on SharePoint Server 2010 Ent SP1. This shouldn't
    be an issue as I am just jumping from 07->10 so as long as my 07 content DB is at a high enough patch level I should be able to move everything right over but will be working a project to upgrade to current SP on the Intranet after I am done with this initial
    consolidation and retirement of the 2007 WSS farm. 
    My thoughts on how to do this.
    The Team wants this to happen so they are willing to stop work on site for a day so I can do this is normal business hours which is really nice of them. I also have a test environment which is pretty close to prod to practice the process on. So my plan
    is to  grab a SQL backup and restore the Content DB to the SQL box for the 2010 Farm. Once the site collection's Content DB is on the right SQL box, use PowerShell to attach the Content DB to a new temp staging Web Application that I created for this
    process. Then backup and restore the site collection to the existing "Teams" Managed Path on the normal production Web Application. I assume to do this it would be best to use a "staging" Content DB for the initial SQL restore. Then set
    up a new "Production" Content Database for them to live on or point it to the existing Teams Content Database. I guess somewhere in here (after import) I should upgrade the site collection to 2010 look and feel. Let them know I am done and they can
    go back to work while I clean up all the staging stuff.
    Am I missing anything obvious here? I might have to do the Staging Web Application creation and cleanup after hours as I think I will need to do an IIS Reset. 
    Once all this is done then I start the project to upgrade the Intranet to 2013. 
    Thanks

    Much detail :) but as a shortcut you can use third party migration tools to have a seamless transition from old version to new. Few to mention, Methalogix and Quest tools. You may also leverage the trial version they offer which most probably cover your
    current situation. 
    The good thing about third party migration tools are you don't have to worry about template mapping nor security mapping. Of course for migration from very old version, like SP2003 to SP2010 requires the security mapping as it's totally different in structure.
    But from SP2007 on-wards the security hierarchy is basically same. One good thing to bear in mind is if you've custom solution there maybe some issue otherwise it's a smooth ride.
    Hope this helps :) 
    Yeah, I know there are shortcuts with third party migration tools but I really think they would be overkill in this case. While I thought of trials, I don't want to waste time going through a trial version only to find the finalize button is grayed out unless
    you pay for it and have to start over with something else. Though it isn't like I have that much data. Entire Site collection is 314MB when I look at storage used in Quotas and Locks. So if the trial was limited to 5GB or something then it would work. 
    I am doing this mini project now to avoid having to jump from 2007 to 2013 as we are getting pressure to get our intranet moved up to 2013. To do this move later would mean I would need to set up a 2010 environment to jump to  before moving them to
    2013 so might as well cram it in now before hand to save a bunch of work later on. As I mentioned, no custom solutions, no custom web parts, nothing but out of the box stuff. Not even the fab 40. So this should be as easy as can be. 
    Worst case that I can think of is that I might loose security. That isn't even that bad being it is a single site collection that I am dealing with. It is wide open to the entire team so just drop their entire AD Security group in Contributor and they would
    be back up and running. Go back and grant 1-2 people advanced permissions and they should be set. 
    Besides the way I look at it, going the PowerShell route is a good refresher for me as it may be similar when I do the move to 2013. We have the upgrade of not only the Intranet but our external web site as well. 

  • Best way to publish multiple sites without a .mac account?

    Hi, all you mac geniuses out there!
    So, I have a mac and a .mac membership and iweb. I use and love all of them. I also have a business in which I am about to incorporate the service of designing websites for various individuals. I would love to be able to use iweb for this. However, I can't put it all on my .mac account. So, my questions are the following:
    1. Do I charge people extra and buy them a .mac account so they have their own idisk even though they won't need the e-mail and other .mac features?
    2. Can I create a website for them on iweb, buy a domain name for them through godaddy or somewhere, publish to a folder, and then upload to a separate hosting space (like through godaddy or somewhere)? And if that's the case, what is the best (and easiest) place to host a site and how exactly does one go about uploading the site once it's published to a folder? Will it still look like the iweb layout?
    3. Any better suggestions?
    Thanks!
    Lisa

    1. Do I charge people extra and buy them a .mac
    account so they have their own idisk even though they
    won't need the e-mail and other .mac features?
    I don't think this would be necessary...
    2. Can I create a website for them on iweb, buy a
    domain name for them through godaddy or somewhere,
    publish to a folder, and then upload to a separate
    hosting space...
    Yes. The best thing for you to do would be to get familiar with a program called "iWebSites" ( http://mistergregg.com/cocoadrillosoftware/ ). I'm sure you don't want your personal .Mac website to be mixed in with your client websites. In addition, you will appreciate the ability to be able to publish your various websites INDEPENDENTLY of one another, so that you only publish your personal site to your .Mac account and your client sites individually as needed. iWebSites helps you to create separate Domain files for iWeb so that each website can "live" in its own space and be edited and published separate from every other site.
    But yes, as far as your client websites go, prepare for a new site with iWebSites, design the site in iWeb, then "Publish to Folder" and then register and upload to the appropriate domain name server directory. I think this would be a slick way to run your business....full service, right?
    Let me know if you have any other questions.

  • Best way to have an image span two columns in a CSS layout?

    My homepage is a typical fixed width three column layout. For the inside, content pages, I basically need the same layout except I need to have an image that spans the left and center columns at the top. Below the image, the left and center columns should continue on. The right column should not change at all m
    My first thought is to start with a two column layout where the left column would contain the image. Then, I would divide the left column into two columns that would start below the image, using a top margin or perhaps another appropriate positioning attribute.
    But before I create a completely new layout for these pages, I thought I'd check and see if there may be an easier or better way to do this. any ideas?

    Thank you, Thank you, Thank you for both responses. But I have to say I went with the AP div solution. In either case, I would have needed a second layout but this way was a much simpler modification to the three column index page. I did try it both ways as I'm still a-learning. I'm finally getting to the point where when I set or change a setting - especially positioning attributes like margins, the outcome is what I expect. I have also experimented enough where I see there is often more than one way to produce the desired result. However, I'm afraid that in many of these cases I can't explain why one method might be better, or preferred over another. Or if in some instances it simply doesn't matter, unless the final issue is arriving at the most efficient and lightest amount of code required to do the job (that's what I call the Holy Grail in programming and scripting).
    As an audio engineer as well, I'm reminded of certain discussions on how to achieve the best sound for this or that, and after going round and round about effects, the science of acoustics, which plug in works best and for what, often the only thing ever really settled upon is "just go by what sounds the best to you". I digress.
    So using the AP div in this case, what, if anything is the downside? Does it matter that its content as well as the rest of the page will be dynamic? I wouldn't think so. Might there be issues with older browsers or mobile browsers? The former is not a concern, but the latter is. Might I be tempted to use an AP div at another time because it's so easy to implement, but then may not be an appropriate use? I think I can properly evaluate that if and when the time comes.
    Am I just over-thinking all this? : )
    Thank you again!
    Edited to add: I wanted to mark both responses as correct, but it wouldn't let me do it. No offense I hope!

  • What is the best way to open a .sit file?

    I downloaded my first .sit file today and thought double-clicking on it would open it with Stuffit Expander (which I also thought was included software, but apparently not -- at least not according to Spotlight). Instead, it for some reason defaulted to Microsoft Word to open it. Since the .sit file is a program that of course didn't work.
    When I checked VersionTracker I noticed that Stuffit Expander has a pretty mediocre user rating.
    *Is there a preferred way to expand .sit files?*
    Replies appreciated.

    Garrett Connelly wrote:
    Expander has been working great for many years. Has something changed?
    I don't know but its MacUpdate rating is 3 stars (out of 5) and its VersionTracker rating is 2 stars (out of 5), so I concluded there must be something about it people aren't happy with.

Maybe you are looking for