BI Idoc Type IS NOT THE SAME AS SOURCE SYSTEM IDOC TYPE

Hi all,
how can we solve the IDoc miss match in source system (ECC6).
Error :
BI Idoc Type ZSTC029 IS NOT THE SAME AS SOURCE SYSTEM IDOC TYPE ZSTC031
please provide me solutions..
Thanks in advance,
Venkatesh

Hi Venkatesh,
Check here.........
BW idoc type not same as source system idoc type
Thanks,
Vijay.

Similar Messages

BI IDOC type ZSBS042 is not the same as source system idoc type ZSBM023.

Hi Evrybody,
I got an error when trying to initialize the delta load.
Error Message :
BI IDOC type ZSBS042 is not the same as source system idoc type ZSBM023.
Thanks for the promt responses
Regards,
Zakir SM

Hi ,
I checked the IDOC with status 51.. I have this message
" No status record was passed to ALE by the application ".
what to do now...
Rgds,
Zakir

Object type RSDS not supported in BAPI source system

Hi
We have a problem when trying to create Data Source in NW2004s with 3rd party tool 'Ascential Datastage' as source system.The error message is "DataSource XXX (DS-DEV): Object type RSDS not supported in BAPI source system".
Is there any note or patch avaialable to be implemented to resolve this problem.Our support package is 07.
Regards
D.Ellora
Message was edited by:
Ellora Dobbala

Hi Ellora,
The latest BI release in SAP NetWeaver 7.0 (2004s) includes a new type of DataSource for which staging BAPI has not yet been aligned.
Third party ETL tool vendors can therefore only implement their load processes using the original type of DataSource from BW 3.x. This DataSource is still provided in the new release without any changes. Upgrading to NetWeaver 7.0 (2004s) BI (BI 7.0) does not therefore endanger existing implementations based on BW 3.x and NetWeaver 2004 (BW 3.5).
It is also possible to migrate third party ETL implementations based on BW 3.x into the new data-flow concept of a NetWeaver 7.0 (2004s) BI environment using new DataSources, transformations (also new), and data transfer processes (DTP) (also new). This is possible because the system provides an emulated view for BW 3.x DataSources, which makes it possible to combine them with NetWeaver 7.0 (2004s) transformations and DTPs for regular batch load processing (this does not include direct access and real-time data acquisition (RDA)).
This allows the benefits of the new data loading concept to be made available in such third party ETL-based loading scenarios.
Regards,
Anil

System alias does not work if not the same as logical system name?

In most of the situations, we define the portal system alias same as the connected R/3 client logical system name.
I also saw some exceptions that system aliases were defined differently from the connected R/3 client logical systems, and they were tested fine.
However I forget the way to make that working.
Could you help me recall how is that achieved?
Thanks!

Hi,
There is nothing tricky here. Just assign more System Aliases to the system connector !

BI Idoc type not same as the source system Idoc type

Hi Experts,
We have refreshed BI 7.0 from production to quality system and while restoring in source system in RSA1 we are getting error message " BI Idoc type ZSZD005 is not the same as source system Idoc type ZSAD008" with ID-RSAR371
Quick response would be really appreciated
Regards,
RaviChandra

Hope this will be helpful for you
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a04af5ab-5737-2b10-67aa-88e25e80b325

RFC Error:The BW IDoc type ZSBA011 is not the same as the source system

Hi Experts,
RSA1Source System (Context Menu) Check
I am getting the below error
<b>The BW IDoc type ZSBA011 is not the same as the source system IDoc type ZSBD012               </b>
What might happened wrong.When i checked with my Basis Consultant who is new to job,Replied every this is ok with regeards to RFC.
Where should i check to correct the error
Thanks

Hi,
Did you do a system copy for BW ?
Try a restore (rightclick on your source system) in most cases this will solve the problem.
If not check the notes below:
184322 Procedure after DB copy of BW source systems
886102      System Landscape Copy for SAP BW 2.X, 3.X and NW2004s BI
325470      Activities after client copy in BW source systems
325525      Copying and renaming systems in a BW environment
184754      Procedure after BW database copy
184447      Building a BW-system landscape
184971      Notes on BW source system connections
140276      Error in source system assignment
524554      Storing destinations in the BW environment
538052 Maintenance of Myself destination in BW
Regards, Patrick Rieken
Message was edited by:
        Patrick Rieken - BI-Formance B.V.

Line item Ship-to Info is not the same in Header Ship-to Party During Sales Order Creation via IDOC

We have observed that during creation of sales order using idoc, the line item ship-to party is not the same with header ship-to. The ship-to party info in line item is equivalent to the header's sold to party. To give you a quick background, Sold to party info is given in idoc and ship to party is being determined using table EDPAR. In this specific scenario, sold to customer is not the same with ship to customer.
Initial checking on the code leads us in function module VIEW_KUAGV. This FM populates partner details of sales order header and line item in program LVEDAF1Z
Below is the code for Sales order Header. Notice that WE_INPUT parameter which contains Ship to party is passed as exporting parameter in FM VIEW_KUAGV. This is the reason why Ship to Party is populated correctly in sales order header but not in sales order item.
Initially, it first set to Sold-To Party. However, if WE_INPUT is given or provided, partner details is set to Ship-To Party.
Please advise on how we can make the ship to party info in header and line item be consistent. This is SAP Standard program which why we are hesitant to make change on the program. If there is a configuration to make this happen, kindly advise.
Regards,
Rommel

Hi Jayesh,
If I understand you correctly, you want that when creating SO from Quoatation
the Ship to Party also follow/copy Ship to Party from Quotation, right?
Just to confirm with you, when you creating SO reference from Quotation, you
use copy/follow-up function, am I right?
You can do this by setting in configuration of Copy Control (like mentioned by Hui).
Step as follow :
1. Go to IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions
2. Create your BAdi (Business Add-In for Copying Control), such as get Ship to
    Party value from source document and use it in current document
3. Use this Rule you have created in BAdi (no. 2), in copy control transaction type
    IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions-> Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
4. Here you set Copying Routine for your transaction types (put name of your Badi
    created in step no. 2)
Or alternatively, you can set it on access sequence in Partner Function
Ship to Party in configuration. You can define access sequence the Ship
to Party is taken from Preceeding Document -> Ship To Party
1. Go to Partner Function access sequence :
    IMG->CRM->Basic Functions->Partner Processing->Define Access Sequence
2. Create new access sequence with following entry :
    - Source COM_PARTNER_A (PrecedingPartner)
    - Check Mapping for Partner Being search
    - Partner Function in Source = Ship To Party
3. Assign this Access Sequence in you Partner Function used in Sales Order Transaction
   Type.
Tell me if this is what you looking for
Gun.

"Batch NO SALEAB. and valuation type 1ST CHOICE are not the same"

Hi MM guru,
Please help me with the error message - "Batch NO SALEAB. and valuation type 1ST CHOICE are not the same" encountered during MB1b transaction.
Thanks in advance,
Iram

Hello Amuthan,
I'm using mov type 311 and the material is not batch managed. I've entered the supplying & receiving batch and then error "Batch NO SALEAB. and valuation type 1ST CHOICE are not the same" was encountered, I found out that in table MCHA that the batch & valuation type for this material is not the same thats why its showing the error. Can you please guide me on how to maintain the data in table MCHA? What configuration we need to set?
Thanks in advance,
Iram

"Material is not the same for confirmation and delivery"

Hello
If this is not the right forum, my apologies. Direct me to the correct one if it is not ....
Have been doing automated test development (HP's QTP) against SAP systems for over a year. I am not an application expert - very much a newbie when it comes to application knowledge but trying to gain some. I have "googled" the phase "Material is not the same for confirmation and delivery" and have not been able to find any references. What does this mean?
I see this message for an iDoc using WE02. Have looked and looked but don't really know what I'm looking for.
Clues?
Thanks,
DW

DW,
I have never seen that exact message, but I have seen similar ones. Generically, the message probably means that you are attempting to perform a transaction against a document (perhaps a Purchase order?) and the Material number (Part Number) contained in the transaction is not the same as the Material number in the originating document in SAP.
An example might be you have previously created a confirmation against a Purchase order, which now exists in SAP. This Confirmation is for a specific Purchase order, item, and material. Now, when you attempt to create an inbound delivery for the Confirmation, the material number contained in the new IDOC is different from the material number that was contained in the original Confirmation.
I don't know what IDOC Message type you are having the problem with, but generically you can do some troubleshooting. Find the SAP Material number in the IDOC (MATNR probably). Find the appropriate reference document number in the IDOC (confirmation number? Purchase order number? or...?), and then manually review the document in SAP to ensure that the Material numbers are the same.
If you are totally lost, you should really consult with an SAP App expert. I am guessing that this is part of the Materials Management module, so you would be asking for an MM expert.
Or, you can send more details, and we can try to help.
What is the IDOC message type?
What is the Message number of the error message? Functionally, what is this IDOC trying to do, from a business perspective?
Rgds,
DB49

Is it possible to change an IDOC and save on the same IDOC number..?

Hi all,
I have an IDOC. When I processed the IDOC, it ended up with error status '51'. There was some problem with the data. So, I changed the data and reprocessed using the T-Code 'WE19' and it was processed successfully. When we reprocess the IDOC using 'WE19', it generates another IDOC number. But, the client is asking that, it should not generate another IDOC number. When we change the IDOC number, it should be saved under the same(ORIGINAL) IDOC number. Is it possible to change an IDOC and save under the same number..? Is there any transaction code to do so. Please give your valuable inputs.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & regards,
Paddu.

Hi,
You can use the transaction WE09..to edit the IDOC data...
Then use the transaction BD87 to post the IDOC..
Thanks
Naren

Results is not the same

I have this problem:
steeve@JUK_PROD> create table t1 as select object_name, owner, object_type from all_objects where 1=0;
Table created.
steeve@JUK_PROD>
steeve@JUK_PROD> declare
2 begin
3 INSERT INTO t1 (object_name, owner, object_type)
4 SELECT object_name, owner, object_type FROM all_objects;
5 end;
6 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
steeve@JUK_PROD>
steeve@JUK_PROD> select count(1) from t1;
COUNT(1)
39459
steeve@JUK_PROD> select count(1) from all_objects;
COUNT(1)
39459
You can see here that the number of rows is the same, no problem here.
steeve@JUK_PROD>
steeve@JUK_PROD> create table t2 as select object_name, owner, object_type from all_objects where 1=0;
Table created.
steeve@JUK_PROD>
steeve@JUK_PROD> create procedure p is
2 begin
3 INSERT INTO t2 (object_name, owner, object_type)
4 SELECT object_name, owner, object_type FROM all_objects;
5 end p;
6 /
Procedure created.
steeve@JUK_PROD>
steeve@JUK_PROD> execute p;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
steeve@JUK_PROD>
steeve@JUK_PROD> select count(1) from t2;
COUNT(1)
39441
steeve@JUK_PROD> select count(1) from all_objects;
COUNT(1)
39461
Why then, when i execute the same code in a procedure, the results is not the same?
Here is the script to reproduce if you want to troubleshoot:
rem connected as sys user
create user steeve identified by steeve default tablespace users;
ALTER USER STEEVE QUOTA UNLIMITED ON USERS;
grant create session to steeve;
grant create procedure to steeve;
grant create table to steeve;
rem connect as steeve user
create table t1 as select object_name, owner, object_type from all_objects where 1=0;
declare
begin
INSERT INTO t1 (object_name, owner, object_type)
SELECT object_name, owner, object_type FROM all_objects;
end;
select count(1) from t1;
select count(1) from all_objects;
create table t2 as select object_name, owner, object_type from all_objects where 1=0;
create procedure p is
begin
INSERT INTO t2 (object_name, owner, object_type)
SELECT object_name, owner, object_type FROM all_objects;
end p;
execute p;
select count(1) from t2;
select count(1) from all_objects;
i just want to add, that i dont have that problem when i run the same example connected with the user sys.
Why this happen?
what rights the user steeve is missing?
Message was edited by:
Steeve

Check the DDL of all_objects will help understand why some objects are missing.
Here's a cut out of partial all_objects DDL
and
       exists (select null from v$enabledprivs
               where priv_number in (
                                      -144 /* EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE */,
                                      -141 /* CREATE ANY PROCEDURE */
    or
       o.type# in (12) /* trigger */
       and
       exists (select null from v$enabledprivs
               where priv_number in (
                                      -152 /* CREATE ANY TRIGGER */
...

Log-on client 200 is not the same as BI clients "600"

Hi Experts,
My data load got failed and when i checked the error message, it says " Log-on client 200 is not the same as BI clients "600"".
Diagnosis
You are using client-dependent BI functions in client 200. However, the standard BI client is 600.
System Response
The function is terminated.
Procedure
Maintain a destination in the BI standard client. For information, see SAP Note 522569.
I went through the sap note and checked the maintenance of rfc desination. But not able to uderstand this issue. Do anyone have good idea about this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Anand

Hi,
In BW, you must work on only client. As the error said, you log on to client 200, but using 600 client as the connected one. Please check the source system conncection whether it is given for the default client in RSADMINA table BWMANDT field or not. if not change that.

With iTunes match, order of the songs in my playlist of mobile devices is not the same as on my computer

In my iTunes on computer, I have several smart play lists. Within each playlist, songs are set to a certain order. Some playlist songs order are organized by name, some playlists are organized by Album, some playlists are organized by artist etc.
When I was syncing my iPhone and iPad directly with my computer, the playlists on my mobile device had same order of songs as on my itunes in computer.
Now, I signed up for iTunes match. With iCloud sync, order of the songs in my playlist of mobile devices is not the same as on my computer. In fact, order of songs within a playlist appears to be completely random. Moreover, order of songs are different in my iPhone 4s and iPad 2
How can I change the order of songs on my mobile devices or how do I make iTunes match to sync my songs such that within a playlist, my songs are in the same order as that of iTunes on my computer.

Thanks mracole. I assume this means order of songs will work with regular play lists I iTunes match. Will try it this afternoon and report.
Please let me know if my understanding is not correct.
Best regards and thanks once again.

I'm trying to reinstall Mavericks on used Macbook Pro. When I log in to my Apple ID, it says it was not the same ID used to purchase Mountain Lion. I need to change user/admin as a lot of the folders and apps are in Chinese!

I'm trying to reinstall Mavericks on used Macbook Pro. When I log in to my Apple ID, it says it was not the same ID used to purchase Mountain Lion. I need to change user/admin as a lot of the folders and apps are in Chinese!

The first thing you should do with a second-hand computer is to erase the internal drive and install a clean copy of OS X. How you do that depends on the model. Look it up on this page to see what version was originally installed.
If the machine shipped with OS X 10.4 or 10.5, you need a boxed and shrink-wrapped retail Snow Leopard (OS X 10.6) installation disc, which you can get from the Apple Store or a reputable reseller — not from eBay or anything of the kind. If the machine has less than 1 GB of memory, you'll need to add more in order to install 10.6. I suggest you install as much memory as it can take, according to the technical specifications.
If the machine shipped with OS X 10.6, you need the installation media that came with it: gray installation discs, or a USB flash drive for some MacBook Air models. If you don't have the media, order replacements from Apple. A retail disc, or the gray discs from another model, will not work.
To boot from an optical disc or a flash drive, insert it, then reboot and hold down the C key at the startup chime. Release the key when you see the gray Apple logo on the screen.
If the machine shipped with OS X 10.7 or later, you don't need media. It should boot into Internet Recovery mode when you hold down the key combination option-command-R at the startup chime. Release the keys when you see a spinning globe.
Once booted from the disc or in Internet Recovery, launch Disk Utility and select the icon of the internal drive — not any of the volume icons nested beneath it. In the Partition tab, select the default options: a GUID partition table with one data volume in Mac OS Extended (Journaled) format. This operation will permanently remove all existing data on the drive, which is what you should do.
After partitioning, quit Disk Utility and run the OS X Installer. When the installation is done, the system will automatically reboot into the Setup Assistant, which will prompt you to transfer the data from another Mac, its backups, or from a Windows computer. If you have any data to transfer, this is usually the best time to do it.
You should then run Software Update and install all available system updates from Apple. If you want to upgrade to a major version of OS X newer than 10.6, buy it from the Mac App Store. Note that you can't keep an upgraded version that was installed by the previous owner. He or she can't legally transfer it to you, and without the Apple ID you won't be able to update it in Software Update or reinstall, if that becomes necessary. The same goes for any App Store products that the previous owner installed — you have to repurchase them.
If the previous owner "accepted" the bundled iLife applications (iPhoto, iMovie, and Garage Band) in the App Store so that he or she could update them, then they're linked to that Apple ID and you won't be able to download them without buying them. Reportedly, Apple customer service has sometimes issued redemption codes for these apps to second owners who asked.
If the previous owner didn't deauthorize the computer in the iTunes Store under his Apple ID, you wont be able toauthorize it under your ID. In that case, contact iTunes Support.

HT5312 how do i reset my admin password, my apple iD password is NOT the same as my admin login password

all ive been seeing is that i can reset my password with my apple iD, but its not the same. and it doesnt do the command R thing or the terminal/utilities thing. so what do i do??

Phil,
First of all, to log in as the HTML DB administrator, you want to use a different page, one that ends in /pls/htmldb/htmldb_admin Try logging in there. If that doesn't work, see this thread about creating a new admin account:
stupid password tricks
Sergio

BI Idoc Type IS NOT THE SAME AS SOURCE SYSTEM IDOC TYPE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for