Booking of rework order cost on original order

Hi,
   I want to know the complete process for booking the cost of rework order on the original order. It means how to do variance calculation & then settle order to original order.
It is urgent. I want step by step process.
thanks

Hi
Create a Reference operation set with a operation that needs to be reworked on and with the control key of a Rework type. Assign this to the trigger point in the parameters. Assign this Trigger point to the last operation in the standard routing you created for that product.
If you create the trigger point as to be triggered at the partial confirmation of the order, then at the confirmation of the order, enter the rework quantity in that field with partial confirmation selected and save the confirmation. while saving, this will create a rework order.
While assigning the parameters to the trigger point, make sure that the order type also is a rework order type.
you can do fcost for rework costing
do KKS2 after teco for the order
use KGI2 for overhead caiculation.
do KO88 for order settlements
award points if useful.
regards
N.Ramesh

Similar Messages

  • Posting settled internal order costs to PM Order

    Hi,
    Our client doesn't have PM module upto now. So they posted all the maintenance costs to internal orders. All the internal orders are settled properly. Now they want to implement PM module. They want the costs previously posted in internal order should be reflected in PM orders.
    How it will possible?  Any inputs please.. is the historical PM order helps???
    Regards
    Radha

    Radha,
    Technically speaking, yes its possible.
    But do you know which costs were booked against each equipment?
    Even if you do, then you will need to write an ABAP program to create PM orders and then move the costs from the settlement orders to the PM orders in the period thatg they were accrued. This is a big job.
    If you only need a record of the equipment costs (ie not move the actual costs) then the simpler approach would be to use Historical Orders.
    PeteA

  • Sales order costing- engineer to order production

    hi
    we have a scenario where the production is started based on the sales order. The product is not standard product, for every  sales order the product changes i.e. the material code should be created along with the sales order at the same point.
    1. Bom is not available for all collective requiremnts at the time of sales order creation therefore the sales order costestimate calculated on the same day of sales order creation does not give the true picture
    2. the chance is that the product that may be produced for the sales order may be after 6 months also, hence the production people are not ready to create bom for the sales order related product
    my question is can we suggest sales order costing in this scenario.
    krishna

    Hello Krishna
    In this case, I think you should suggest for sales order costing with variant configuration since the product is not standard and changes for every sales order. The sales order BOM needs to be created and a cost estimate should be taken. If the details are not available then the sales people should edit the sales order through VA02 later and rerun the cost estimate. After the BOM is finalised the production process may start.

  • Visibility of purchase order costs in sales order

    We are a make-to-order sales and manufacturing organisation. Most of our products are manufactured in-house but some are procured externally. Where we manufacture products in-house we are able to see the costs in the EK02 condition type within the sales order. However, where we procure the product externally this is not the case. What is the best solution for making these costs visible as we unable to measure margin without them?

    Peter,
    As per my view   If you use EK01 condition type, the result of unit costing is issued to the first position on the conditions screen for the item. The value can be used as a basis for price determination. 
    and EK02 is only for  statistical purpose
    The parts which you are procuring externally's Cost will come from MM side.
    Thanks,
    Raja

  • Getting Total Order Cost for each order

    I have a fact table, order lines.
    There are two dimension tables, customer & Product.
    For each order i want to display on a pivot table:
    - the cost of the line.
    -the cost of the total order. 
    Is this possible? I have been playing with ALL & All except but have not found a solution yet. some metadata is below
    CustomerID CustomerName
    1 john
    2 mary
    3 jim
    4 kevin
    ProductID ProductName Price
    1 pen 5
    2 cup 4
    3 car 7
    4 phone 3
    OrderLineID CustomerID ProductID Quantity
    1 1 2 2
    1 1 3 2
    2 2 1 4
    3 1 2 5
    3 1 2 4
    3 4 4 6
    4 4 4 6

    Hi Winston,
    Could you kindly provide an example of the output you'd expect based on the above data? Also, I've noticed that there is no OrderID column in the order line table. How would you determine which OrderLineIDs belong to a single order?
    Regards,
    Michael Amadi
    Please use the 'Mark as answer' link to mark a post that answers your question. If you find a reply helpful, please remember to vote it as helpful :)
    Website: http://www.nimblelearn.com
    Blog: http://www.nimblelearn.com/blog
    Twitter: @nimblelearn

  • Keeping album song orders in their original order???

    Hello everyone,
    I'm a nubie to mastering Itunes, but I was wondering if anyone can help me keep my albums, song orders, organized in their original track order, instead of alphabetically.
    Most of my mp3's are in individual album files inside the artist file, with a number order beginning each track name 01_tracka, 02_trackb, etc. etc.
    Anyway, when I add all my songs to itunes and use my library/browser to search for albums, they come up alphabetically totally messing up my original song orders.
    What am I doing wrong?
    thanks,
    Tucky
    P.S. I don't let itunes organize my music folder, because I want to keep my original file folder structure.

    Gene,
    iTunes does not use the file names to display or sort the tracks. It uses the tags associated with each track. You can edit a track's tags by highlighting the track, pressing Command-I, and then clicking on the Info tab.
    To put an album in track order, you would need to enter the track number in that field of the get Info box. You would at least need to actual track number, you could add the total number of tracks as well.
    You sort iTunes by clicking on one of the headers of the spreadsheet-like display. So, if you select a single album to look at, you could sort it in track order by clicking the header of the "Track #" column. If you are displaying all the albums by a particular artist, if you have the track tag filled in, then you can click on the "Album" header to sort by the album name and each album will be sorted in track order.
    View Options (Command-J) only determines what columns are displayed in the main "spreadsheet" like display of iTunes. To actually sort the tunes, you need to click on the header of the column you want to sort by.

  • Sale order costing during service order integration

    Hi,
    When I am generating service order from sale order, and settling my service order back to the sale order item. Do I need to run DP90 to capture the service cost? If so please explain.
    Regards,
    N.Nagaraju

    yes, you would need to run DP90 to generate a billing document for the customer based on the service order / sales order. Have a look at [SAP Help|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/4b/5cfc3743572b1ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm] for detailed help.
    The actual cost of service is collected on the service order and could be different from the cost billed to the customer through the billing document generated through DP90.
    Regards
    Narasimhan

  • Report by Internal Order that includes cost element and order type

    Good Morning Gurus'
    Is there an SAP Standard Report that shows Internal order, cost element and order type?  I find many with order, but not order type.
    Thanks a million!!

    Hi,
    No, I don't think so. You can create a workaround by defining order group based on order type by intervals. Or, of course, develop your own report.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Producrt Cost by Sales Order with Valuated Stock

    Hi Gurus,
    My client is having  Producrt Cost by Sales Order with Valuated Sales Order Stock. Can anybody reply me for my following issues.
    1. while calculating Sales order cost estimate thru VA02 , the same Cost estimate is appearing against with EK02 condition type in Sales order Condotions. what is the use of Sales order Cost estimate? is there any impact on production?
    2. What is Difference between Sales Order Cost Estimate and Order BOM Cost estimate?
    3.when can we calculate Sales Order Cost estimate ? whether before Production or before billing ? can anybody tell me please..
    4.while settling the production order also system picking the cost in VPRS not in EK02, i am not sure about this step.can any body correct if i am wrong
    5.I know we can caluculate WIP in Sales order also. when can we calculate ? before settling the Production order or after production ?
    thanks
    Prasad

    Hi,
    there are 3 types of scenarios in MTO.
    In Two scenarios Sale Order would be cost object - (Non-Valuated Sale orders stock and Valuated Sale Order stock with Sale order being Cost Object)
    In third scenario (Valuated Sale Order Stock without Sale Order controlling), Only Production Order is the Cost Object.
    In all the cases wherever the Sale Order is the cost object, Sale Order is the final Receiver.  Only the difference is that in valuated sale order stock, stock entries would be passed to FI and in non-valuated sale order, no goods movement for FG will be there.
    Please let me know if you need further details in this regard
    Surya

  • Costing on Internal Orders with different plan versions

    Hi,
    Is it possible to carry out Costing on Internal Orders using different plan versions?
    I would like to carry out more than one costing on Internal Order so that I could compare different versions. Maybe there are other parameters (other than plan versions) which can be used for executing different parallel costing.
    Best wishes,
    Karol

    Hi Karol,
    In Release 3.0, the following new planning functions are available in order planning:
    <b>Copy plan versions</b>
    In Release 3.0, you can plan order costs for internal orders in different versions. In contrast to earlier releases, you can now
    1. change versions
    2. copy versions
    3. Here you can select :
                                 the planned values to be copied: annual or total values
                                 whether the planned values in the target version are to be retained or overwritten compare versions using the information system
    Planned values are not revaluated in the target version (for example, when you change the value date).
    Overhead and settlements are not copied and, if required, must be repeated in the target version
    Regards,
    Hemachandra K S
    <b>Please, donot forget to mark the answer as Helpful, Very Helpful or Problem solved.</b>

  • Sales order costing  - Z-report without going to sales order/quotation

    Dear All,
    Currently we are arriving the pricing thru sales order costing. After doing the sales order costing in sales order / Quotation, the costing value flow to condition type EK01. Now management has decided that, to go for manual price and put it in z-table. From z-table system will pick and show in sales order / quotation.
    Now management want to compare the sales order costing price as well as z-table price. They need z-report.
    They will put the material, plant, pricing date and costing variants in the initial screen. then after execution of this report, they should able to see sales order costing price and z-table price.
    They do not want to do the sales order costing thru sales order/quotation.
    Now the problem here is I do not know how to do the sales order costing without going thru sales order/quotation. Please provide the FM, or related table for this report.
    Waiting for you reply.
    Regards,
    Niranjan

    Hi
    Check the table KONV, with respect to VBAK-KNUMV. the table KONV keeps the record of all the Condition type of a documet and KNUMV no is a unique no. generated by the sytem for avery document.
    Hope it will help.
    Regards
    AA

  • Sales order cost objective vs OKB9  Internal order cost object.

    Hi All,
    we facing an  issue with sales order cost objective vs OKB9 cost object.
    For IC PO service material, we assigned account assignment category 4.Reasonis Service material was not showing on G\R account.
    The G\L account 7898788, we assigned to Service Item (material type DIEN)  , for G\Cost 7898788 cost element is assigned in OKB9. Combination business + order 3478787.
    Now conflict with sales order cost objective vs OKB9  internal order cost object.
    While posting intercompany IR posting system thronging below error messageu2026
    Enter only one true account assignment
    Message no. KI249
    Diagnosis
    You made assignments to several objects in CO (cost center, order, project etc.). 2 of these have been created as true objects.
    System Response
    You are allowed only one account assignment for each cost-relevant account
    How to resolve this issue.. Do I make any config changes in the system to overcome this issue?
    Or any sub account to assin in VKOA config for internal orderu2026
    Regards,
    Adi

    Hi Waman,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Issue :  IR failed to post for wax  Sales Order -> ICPO  - Error:  Enter only one true account assignmentu2019.
    Background:
    Original setup  in  Test system   & Productionu2013 account determination for servive (DIEN) account assignment category u20184u2019 was linked to G/L Account  34444444, As part of project orange u2019, account determination was linked to account u201889710100u2019.
    Account u20188970100u2019   34444444 was replaced with 8970100 ,is not linked to any cost center & always post with reference to IC Sales Order as per config in OKB9 based on company code (US99) + cost element (89701100) + business area (9yyy). This caused a conflict while posting IR, system could not determine exact order for posting financial value.
    Conflict:  Actual Sales Order 34789343 is  linked to PO via account assignment category & IC dummy sales order (8014331) is determine via config setting. Two cost objects cannot be linked to one IR G/L account booking.
    Regards,
    Adi

  • Capture the Sales order cost

    Dear All,
          My client business process is trading business , based on the sales order  they will create the purchase order,
    here I want to capture all the sales order related costs  and also  based on the sales order those   purchase orders cost also I want to capture
    Anybody could you please give me your input
    Thanks & Regards
    Sri

    Thanks for your reply ajay
    I will give you more inputs on this issue
    In my trading business, against the sales order I am going raise the purchase order
    Here two different requirement
    Sales order wise Profitability – Here I have given the solution in COPA report  
    I want to capture Sales order and  related purchase order  expenses  like bank charges, interest, commission, transport, port charges, duty   and exchange gain or loss everything
    So in my 2nd   query shall I go with  account assignment category as E,
    or shall I create each sales as separate internal order
    or when I book the expenses itself  shall I capture the cost  through as copa  characteristic
    need Some more clarity
    Thanks
    Sri

  • Two cost objects Sales order , OKB9 business area +order

    Hi All,
    While posting intercompany IR system thronging below error messageu2026
    Enter only one true account assignment
    Message no. KI249
    Diagnosis
    You made assignments to several objects in CO (cost center, order, project etc.). 2 of these have been created as true objects.
    System Response
    You are allowed only one account assignment for each cost-relevant account.
    What we found in our system:
    Conflict:  Actual Sales Order 3487909 is linked to PO via account assignment category 4& IC dummy sales order (OKB9 config Business area 3000 + order 807898 assigned.
    Due Two cost objects cannot be linked to one IR G/L account booking.
    What is the best solution for this to post Intercompany IR with conflict two cost objects.
    Regards,
    Adi

    Hi All,
    we facing an  issue with sales order cost objective vs OKB9 cost object.
    For IC PO service material, we assigned account assignment category 4.Reasonis Service material was not showing on G\R account.
    The G\L account 7898788, we assigned to Service Item (material type DIEN)  , for G\Cost 7898788 cost element is assigned in OKB9. Combination business + order 3478787.
    Now conflict with sales order cost objective vs OKB9  internal order cost object.
    While posting intercompany IR posting system thronging below error messageu2026
    Enter only one true account assignment
    Message no. KI249
    Diagnosis
    You made assignments to several objects in CO (cost center, order, project etc.). 2 of these have been created as true objects.
    System Response
    You are allowed only one account assignment for each cost-relevant account
    How to resolve this issue.. Do I make any config changes in the system to overcome this issue?
    Or any sub account to assinment  in VKOA config for internal orderu2026
    Regards,
    Adi

  • Production Orders cost

    Hi gurus,
    I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but I'm PP consultant and just starting a new projec on which the most important topics are production and costs so here are my questions.
    1.- What is the responsability of the PP consultant regarding production costs, order costs, product costing etc?
    2.- Can someone explain the integration of PP and CO.
    3.- In my client company I see this scenario: it is a consumable goods manufactory industry and they buy cinnamon but they only make a huge one purchase a year, only in january they buy the cinnamon and it lasts for all year, so on that particular month they have to pay for the hole freight of the cinnamon, the product that uses the cinnamon does not reflect the real costs since the whole freight is taken at january, then in february they have excellent results since they produce the same qty but with less costs.
    This is a common problem here, because there are like 5 raw materils that are bought in this way, so how to reflect a proportion of the cost while consuming the raw material? and the question also would be if I as PP consultant should do that or is it CO stuff.
    Thanks experts I hope you can help me with this, I would really appreciate

    Dear standard values and activity types relevant to cost centers are defined in work centers(CR01) which are assigned in
    particular material routings(CA01) and activity rates are maintained in KP26.
    Check below links for in detail information about product costing.
    www.sap-topjobs.com/SpecialPP/samplepc.doc
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/bpx/solutions?rid=/webcontent/uuid/4f0f6717-0b01-0010-949b-9ab68dd45fec [original link is broken]
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Product+Costing
    Cheers
    KK

Maybe you are looking for