Bootcamp don`t support my 64 bit file

Hello
I have downloaded a windows home premium 64 bit iso, but bootcamp don`t accept my iso with the error that bootcamp don`t support a 32 bit iso file although I have a 64 bit version.
thanks for answers

Are you sure your Mac supports 64 bit?
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1846
If it does, I'll ask a moderator move this thread to the Boot Camp forum, where more people might know why it isn't working.

Similar Messages

  • Bootcamp don't support AHCI,SSD can't be full speed...

    bootcamp don't support AHCI,SSD can't be full speed...

    Why do you need to use AHCI? If you have a SATA III compatible Mac, Boot Camp should run just fine with any 6Gps drive on the market - at full speeds.
    Clinton

  • Bootcamp 3.0 and the 64-bit version of Windows 7 ?

    Does Bootcamp 3.0 support the 64-bit version of Windows 7 ?
    Sorry for my bad English

    It has nothing to do with SL or Boot Camp 3.0, but is based on the EFI firmware used in the iMac not being 64-bit (EFI64; also part of Unified EFI 2.x).
    If your Mac is listed as one that can boot Snow Leopard in 64-bit kernel mode (using '6' and '4' keys on startup, and 64-bit drivers and extensions).
    The only way to add Windows 7 64-bit is through firmware, and that isn't going to happen.

  • 2011 MacBook Pro, 64 bit i7 quad core, upgraded to Lion OSx, Bootcamp installed with Windows 7, wanting to install Windows 8 (don't ask), tried downloading/installing bootcamp 5.0.5033, error message something similar to bootcamp doesn't support this Win

    2011 MacBook Pro, 64 bit i7 quad core, upgraded to Lion OSx, Bootcamp installed with Windows 7, wanting to install Windows 8 (don't ask), tried downloading/installing bootcamp 5.0.5033 (both on the mac/windows partitions (actually using a parallel to run Windows)), error message something similar to bootcamp doesn't support this Windows
    So the question is am I doing something wrong? Should I just try and install windows 8 through my windows 7 partition and see if I can use the bootcamp 5.05033. Or do I solely have to use the bootcamp to install Windows 8? I'm not too familiar with bootcamp and how it runs.

    if you're using parallels and full bootcamp then you're making it 100% more troublesome for youself then it needs to be
    bootcamp is running windows directly on the hardware this give full memory and cpu and 3d video game power
    running windows in parallels is running a virtual machine where one can't run powerful games and the like but one can have it in a window and change fast between osx and windows
    parallels as the only virutal machine (as far as I know) support not have the operating system as a file on the osx harddisk but can access a bootcamp parition as virtual machine but without the benefits bootcamps provides
    it's a service parallels provide for those who want both to play games in normal bootcamp and sometimes use windows in a virutal machine
    just install it like a normal virtual machine and you need not worry about bootcamp drivers and the likes
    plus it would mean that the windows part would be a part of the timemachine bacup of osx
    which it is not when it's in bootcamp

  • Support for 32-bit

    I have a number of 32-bit files produced by the Merge to HDR routine in PS CS2 and CS3.
    I store the 32-bit files as the key creative stage in HDR processing is in the reduction to 16-bit (Image> Mode> 16 bpc in PS) and so it's handy to keep the 32-bit files to make alternate 16-bit versions. Currently it's not possible to import 32-bit files into the LR Library, so I'm stuck with using Bridge if I want to be able to see these files. I'm not asking for the ability to perform the 16-bit reduction in LR, just to be able to locate them in the Library so I can use LR as the starting point for all aspects of my workflow. The Library is so much better than Bridge in so many ways...
    Can we have support for 32-bit in LR1.1, please?

    I second this motion. I'd really like Lightroom to support the Bridge-style Photoshop workflows (e.g. Photomerge, Merge to HDR) fully, including representation of all produced assets including 32-bit files. In a more perfect world, power-users could even create custom workflow scripts (e.g. in Javascript ala PS CS3 scripting) in Lightroom.
    As a Photoshop user, I don't have a pressing need for full 32-bit support in Lightroom itself. However, I find Lightroom highly desirable as a photographer's workflow management solution and front-end to the more powerful tools in Photoshop.

  • Logic pro 7 cannot import 32 bit file

    i was trying to import a 32 bit audio file but logic cannot read it and cannot play it.
    this is weird because in cubase and protools i can do it.
    is there any way i can do it in logic.
    if not please apple make it happen its basic.

    visit:
    http://www.logicprohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=1442
    bob hunt explains a little about developments and reasons for some of logics limitations. if logic had been developed from the ground up then we would be better able to complain about some weird limitations. but logic is deep - really deep. i think some of these limitations are to do with inhereting a vast and complex programme. as it says in the report, they have to balance commercial needs (ie new features) and engineering "challenges" and stability. sounds like there are trade offs, and this makes sense.
    i don't think we'll have too long to wait before logic will support 32 bit.
    personally it hink there are much higher prorities than 32 bit support if 32 bit support meant a complete redesign of the audio engine.

  • Does Mavericks add support for 10 bit per channel capable monitors

    Just bought a HP Dreamcolor z27X monitor and have a new Mac Pro 6,1 and would like to know if my workstation supports the full capabilities of the monitor I just purchased.

    JonB8305 wrote:
    10.9.3 still doesn't add the 10 bit support.
    That 'is a strong inhalation of breath' (forum will not allow s..ks). I have to say Apple are falling way behind in terms of supporting current media standards.
    Not ony has 10bit video been around for quite some time now and is something used and supported in Adobe products in the Windows world, but Apple have also failed to support HD audio standards as used in Blu-Ray as an example and also look like failing to support H.265 as will be used for 4K video. (H.265 is twice as efficient as H.264 making it far more practical for the much bigger bandwidth requirements of 4K video.)
    Now in the case of HD audio and H.265 it might be that there is no justification from a playback point of view from Apple's perspective, but what Apple appear to have forgotten is that Mac used to be the first choice for creating media files and if Apple don't support these standards then Macs can no longer be viewed as being suitable for media creation. Therefore this is a huge own goal on Apple's part as content creators would be precisely those people looking to buy new Mac Pro systems and Apple have at least designed the hardware to support 4K editing even if their software is increasingly too feeble to support the required standards.
    Note: I have previously submitted an enhancement request to Apple regarding 10bit video support, and also H.265 support, both prior to Mavericks being released.
    I have no problem with Apple not supporting Blu-Ray playback in the form of providing themselves a Blu-Ray player. However as above I feel they should make the Mac or more accurately OS X able to utilise the same formats as this will allow both content creation tools, and also the possibility for a third-party Blu-Ray player that supports HD audio formats. It is apparently possible for a Mac running Windows in Boot Camp to play these HD audio formats which makes sense since Macs use pretty much the same hardware as 'real' PCs so it is just OS X that is the problem. In fact the way things are going even Linux is moving ahead of OS X in terms of media format support.

  • [FEATURE REQUEST] - dlna client in Xperia WALKMAN Android app does not support flac or ogg files

    Hi, I have found a pretty bad bug in the dlna support in the WALKMAN android app for Xperia phones.
    Please could a mod or a community person who is in contact with the developers, pass this info on to them and ask them to please work on it.
    I have the latest updated Version 8.3.A.0.5 of the WALKMAN android app installed on a SONY XPERIA Z mobile phone and I have a dlna server set up and running on my local network.
    If I download, install and use the DNLA Total Media app available in the Google play store instead of the WALKMAN app, I can play flac and m4a files; no problem.
    However, if I use the WALKMAN app to browse to my dlna server and try to play flac or m4a files, I get a small black box on screen that says "Content not available."
    If I browse to and select an mp3 file instead, the WALKMAN app will play (stream) the mp3 file and no small black box will appear.
    So it looks like the dlna part of the SONY WALKMAN app is missing support for some audio file container types which are supported by default on the Android operating system and work natively in the WALKMAN app (I tested play back from internal storage.) I believe ogg format playback is missing also. Because it is not required by the dlna specification.
    Please improve file type support in the dlna client part of the WALKMAN app for XPERIA phones. People working in professional audio environments don't use mp3 anymore (And haven't done for over five years.)
    Thank You

    Thanks for the feedback!
    As you say, i believe the DLNA standard doesn't have any support for flac and ogg but i've seen some 3:rd party apps that can do it but i'm not sure if those uses DLNA in that case or just UPnP. I will forward your feedback though.
    The only solution for this that i know of today is to use a 3:rd party app or perhaps mount the share using SMB instead from Settings -> Storage.
     - Official Sony Xperia Support Staff
    If you're new to our forums make sure that you have read our Discussion guidelines.
    If you want to get in touch with the local support team for your country please visit our contact page.

  • Error/warning message "you don't have permission to modify files in this network location"

    Hi,
    We have a windows server 2008 running, and we access it via remote desktop. And there's this certain folder that all users access, and where we save important files. So, since this is where important files are stored, we wanted to disable deletion (and if
    possible moving) of the folder and everything under it. However, it's harder than i thought. Right now, we have the permissions "Delete" and "Delete files and subfolders" disabled already, BUT when we try to save a file to this folder,
    we got this warning/error message:
    "You don't have permission to modify files in this network location"
    The file is saved however, but there's no content. But when we try to cut/copy an existing file to this folder, it works.
    Does anyone know how a workaround on this issue. I've already spent days configuring the settings, and when one works, another issue comes up. This is really frustrating.
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    What are NTFS Permissions and Share Permissions of the shared folder? If you remove delete permissions, when someone tried to create a new folder, they couldn't rename it. Without Delete permission, we can open, modify a file and save with the same file name
    but cannot create a new file with a new name.
    For more detailed information, please refer to the thread below:
    NTFS Permissions Question - Allow creation but not deletion
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/3335a9b3-d49a-42f0-970a-3fe44b551274/ntfs-permissions-question-allow-creation-but-not-deletion
    Best Regards,
    Mandy 
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Is there a small and lite portable, around 5 lbs or less, printer for my iPad to take on vacation for photos, more than 1 at a time, and words? I have both HP dj460 and ps 616A but they don't support iPad. Is there a device, work around or ePrinter air pr

    Is there a small and lite (5 lbs or under) portable air printer / ePrinter I can use to print contact sheets of photos and words with my iPads? I already have the HP dj460 and HP ps 616A but they don't support the iPads.

    Helper app -- /print n share
    Print directly to the widest range of network or WiFi printers available in any app. Alternatively print via your computer to ALL printers including USB & Bluetooth printers. View read and display large PDF, Office & iWork files. Easily transfer & store files from the Cloud or your computer.
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/print-n-share/id301656026?mt=8
    HP  ePrint Home & Biz
        http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hp-eprint-home-biz/id299531647?mt=8
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/searchResults?tmp_product=HP+Photosmart+5515+ e-All-in-One+Printer+-+B111a&product=5063608&tmp_qt=eprint&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en&su bmit
    Mobile printing.
    This blogger found one solution.
    http://genuinely-original.blogspot.com/search/label/iPad%20Printing
    Make Portable Printing Easier with Print n Share and the Brother RJ-4040
    http://prmac.com/release-id-44494.htm
    Use an airprinter with a power inverter
    http://genuinely-original.blogspot.com/search/label/iPad%20Printing
    see makethisstuffwork post in:
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4987217?tstart=0
    Brother PocketJet® 673
    -- Prints on a variety of 8.5" wide thermal media.
    -- Print PDF files from your iPhone and iPad with the PJ-673 Print app
    http://www.brother-usa.com/Mobile/ModelDetail.aspx?ProductID=pj673-k&PG=26#.UeX0 Z18pDDJ
    List of supported AirPrinters.
       http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4356

  • Display Quality issue after updating to Bootcamp 3.1 (windows 7 64-bit)

    I managed to install Windows 7 64-bit without issues (all issues got resolved after installing bootcamp 3.0 from the OSX DVD).
    Then I saw the BootCamp update for windows 7 64-bit as being (Recommended) and I installed it...
    after that I got a problem in the screen where I get low quality in gradient colors.
    I tried installing the ATI Radeon 4850 Driver from the ATI website , but without any luck, the driver is identified correctly and color depth (32-bit) , but still the quality isn't acceptable.
    Anyone facing similar issue? please advise ? I tried restore point but it failed.
    Any suggestions?

    RegrettingSwitch wrote:
    I think that any of you expecting (as I was) non-mobility cards are going to
    be disappointed (as I am). SiSoft Sandra definitely reports Radeon HD4850
    Mobility in my iMac, which is the reason I can't install the latest Catalyst
    Are you sure? Since both CPU-Z 1.53.1 and Catalyst Control Center are stating that my graphic card is a ATI Radeon HD 4850 (device ID 944A).. :S
    So, Bootcamp 3.1 seems to have solved nothing (plugging headphones in still
    jumps one core straight to ~100%) and actually created a problem that didn't
    exist - i.e colour banding!. And, obviously, no software fix is going address
    You could try to roll back the driver. I've more or less the instruction written in this thread and at the moment, with 8.661 version of the driver I don't have the color banding issue (I've to test stability yet, since it seems that this driver version is quite more unstable).
    However, yeah I feel your disappointment, I'm a Mac user since 2001, changed several macs and this is the first one that comes with so much issues.

  • Why does Silverlight install process state that my 64-bit Win Vista OS does NOT support the 64-bit version of Silverlight?

    As of Monday 4/20, I've encountered a significant problem with Silverlight on my Vista PC. 
    Several weeks ago I read a brief item stating that Google would be dropping support for npapi and that it would affect Silverlight sometime in April.  One of my key daily apps uses Silverlight, but I didn't receive notification from that software's author
    about the pending change and how it would be handled.  Successfully used the app every week (Mon-Fri) this month for 8-10 hrs/dy day (as I've been doing for the past ~5+ years: past year under Chrome, year before that under FireFox, ~3 prior years
    under IE) and on Fri 4/17 shut it down for the weekend.  When I booted up on Mon morning and tried to log into the key app however, it prompted me to download and install Silverlight, acting as though I never had it installed!  
    I recalled the earlier warning about Google dropping support, so I closed Chrome, started up FireFox, but got the same prompt from the app -- it directed me to install Silverlight.  I downloaded it (had no choice as to which version, just got the "Silverlight_x64.exe"
    file) and got part-way through the install when this error msg popped up:  "Unable to Install Silverlight.  Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight".  WHAT?!   Clicking on the "more info"
    link led to this msg:  "Message ID: 1518.  Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight.  Click here for the latest version of Silverlight."  That link simply led back to the download page which resulted
    in receiving another copy of the same executable file.
    According to my system ( > Control Panel > System ), I'm running "Windows Vista Home Premium", with a "System Type:  64-bit Operating System".  I've been using this same Vista PC since Sep 2008 and running Silverlight for
    around the past 5 yrs.
    ? -- Why doe the Silverlight installer code flag my OS as not supported?   
    ? -- Is there a way to get an older version of Silverlight that will run under Vista?  
    Thanks in advance for any helpful comments.

    Andy -- Thanks for the link, but I'm not adventurous enough to download from a non-MSFT site.  
    Besides, since I didn't make any changes to my hardware/software config, I expect a MSFT rep to explain why their two programs suddenly stopped working together and then provide whatever code fix is needed.  A phone call to their tech support (predictably)
    led to nowhere but a recommendation to purchase one of the company's support offerings (which I declined to pursue).  The Silverlight development team appears to participate in these forums, so I'd hope one or more of them offers a realistic solution.
    Here's something I forgot to mention in my original post:  In several of the threads on this subject (some dating back to 2008!), people have
    suggested running IE as the browser vs FireFox or Chrome; however, that idea fails to note that the error msg (Message ID:1518) clearly states that "your operating
    system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight"; it doesn't say anything about
    what browser you're using.  

  • BUG! Not system locale Filenames support for 32-bit applications error in Windows 8.1 x64 and other microssoft x64 OS-s.

    BUG! Not system locale Filenames support for 32-bit applications error in Windows 8.1 x64.        
    All Windows x64 (XP,2003,2007,Vista,7,8) have no support for not system locale filenames|foldernames for all 32-bit applications. I think it is BUG!
    For example,  it is possible to read files|folders with French or Chinese in English locale windows installed, rename it, but it is not possible open it, edit or delete. (ERRORS: File not found OR Unknown format)
    With using 64-bit programs no such problems. How does it works and how can I fix this? Is it problem with encoding in translating kernel instructions for 32-bit apps in x64 Windows OS's? Whether there are
    solutions to this problem OR some hacks|fixes? 

    Hi,
    Have you installed the language package for French or Chinese?
    If no, please download the language package and install them.
    To download language package, please click the link below,
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/language-packs#lptabs=win7
    Best Regards.
    Steven Lee
    TechNet Community Support

  • My MacBook Pro keeps making copies of a document that I am trying to save. I don't want to duplicate the file. I only want to save it on both my hard drive and my external hard drive. I do not want to change its name for every save, which the computer see

    My MacBook Pro keeps making copies of a document that I am trying to save. I don't want to duplicate the file. I only want to save it on both my hard drive and my external hard drive. I do not want to change its name for every save, which the computer seems insistent on doing. Help!!

    11lizzyp wrote:
    can't be saved because the file is read-only.
    I did not create the file to be read-only. I created to be able to continue to add to it as I work on it.
    More on versions here:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4753
    local snapshots:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4878
    Sounds like a permissions problem ie read only.
    If running repair permissions from your DiskUtility.app does not sort it,
    Someone should jump in here with erudite and concise fix.

  • I have "migrated" my Time Capsule files to my new iMac and most of the files to me "I don't have permission to view files" I am they admin....will I thought I was. What gives?

    I have "migrated" my Time Capsule files to my new iMac and most of the files to me "I don't have permission to view files" I am they admin....will I thought I was. What gives?

    You should be able to change the permissions on the files.. this is yet another bungle by Mavericks I suspect.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH13799
    Sometimes it is because you Migrated wrongly.
    http://pondini.org/TM/E10.html
    It is not up to Mavericks because sadly the guy who wrote all this great info died recently.

Maybe you are looking for