BPE Error with condition in block

Hello to all,
I've got following BPE - scenario:
1. Receive
Block with condition ( Cond_Var CP "*BLA*")
Branch 1: Transformation step, send step
Branch 2: send step.
End block
From time to time the Cond_Var contains the pattern BLA but still branch 2 is executed, instead of branch 1, althouh branch 2 is the correct one.
If I restart the message from the scratch branch 1 will be executed.
What's the problem?
Regards Christian

Hello,
I've found the problem. Sometimes the wrong receiver determination is taken, due to a bug in message packing.
Have a look at note 1163661.
Best regards
Christian

Similar Messages

Error with PL/SQL block

Hi
If I run PL/SQL block
DECLARE
CURSOR C1 is SELECT CLM_CASE_NO FROM CLAIM_OBJECT.CLM_INVLVD_PRTY_T where CLM_CASE_NO=XXXX;
BEGIN
FOR X in C1 loop
INSERT INTO POSTL_ADDRS_ARCHIVE P (SELECT A.* FROM CLAIM_OBJECT.POSTL_ADDRS A, CLAIM_OBJECT.CLM_INVLVD_PRTY_T C WHERE
C.CLNT_NO = A.CLNT_NO AND C.CURR_ROW_IND='A' AND C.CLM_CASE_NO =X.CLM_CASE_NO );
end loop;
end;
there is no error with the above block
If I remove where clause in cursor and run block
DECLARE
CURSOR C1 is SELECT CLM_CASE_NO FROM CLAIM_OBJECT.CLM_INVLVD_PRTY_T;
BEGIN
FOR X in C1 loop
INSERT INTO POSTL_ADDRS_ARCHIVE P (SELECT A.* FROM CLAIM_OBJECT.POSTL_ADDRS A, CLAIM_OBJECT.CLM_INVLVD_PRTY_T C WHERE
C.CLNT_NO = A.CLNT_NO AND C.CURR_ROW_IND='A' AND C.CLM_CASE_NO =X.CLM_CASE_NO );
end loop;
end;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
ORA-06512: at line 12
I searched for ORA-06512
Cause:
This error message indicates the line number in the PLSQL code that the error resulted.
SELECT CLM_CASE_NO FROM CLAIM_OBJECT.CLM_INVLVD_PRTY_T has over 800,672 records.
SELECT CLM_CASE_NO FROM CLAIM_OBJECT.CLM_INVLVD_PRTY_T where CLM_CASE_NO=XXXX; has 2 records.
I am not not understanding why block 2 is throwing error (with no where clause in cursor)
Any help will be greatly appreciated
Thanks in advance

As the error message indicates clearly the process was cancelled as you pressed CTRL+C. And yes you can’t see any data you insert in one session from other session until it gets committed. And as others have mentioned row by row operation is very expensive think about revising your approach.
Instead of having a cursor why don’t you join it directly in you select in the insert statement and try?
Thanks,
Karthick.
Message was edited by:
karthick_arp

Pricing error with condition type HI02

Hi Friends,
I have problem in pricing procedure for customer hierarchy condition type HI02. I have created the condition node i.e.6222 and assigned customer 1500 and i also maintained the condition record for the same and also put in the pricing procedure as well. Now while i am creating sales order the condition type HI02 is not coming automatically rather i am able to put the same manually. I want the system should pick the condition type HI02 automatically. Please suggest me IMG setting which i sould maintain for customer hierarchy pricing.
Thanks in advance,
Bharat B

Dear Barath
You are right
HI02 is a item condition type only used for customer hierarchy discounts and the access sequence for the same is HI02 with condition table 065 that is customer hierarchy/material and the same is positioned in V/07 in the access sequence details in seven consecutive steps (the same condition table in all the seven steps) but the field in each table differing
The field in table 065 which is positioned in no 1 is HIENR 01
The field in table 065 which is positioned in no 2 is HIENR 02
The field in table 065 which is positioned in no 3 is HIENR 03
and the most important thing here is exclusive indicator ticked in all the steps exept the seventh step
That means if at hierarchy level 1 system finds a record then it stops searching
I have a feeling that your access sequence alignmemt must be wrong somewhere and check for exclusive indicator marking
HI01 is a item condition type only used for customer hierarchy discounts and the access sequence for the same is HI01 with condition table 064 that is customer hierarchy and the same is positioned in V/07 in the access sequence details in seven consecutive steps (the same condition table in all the seven steps) but the field in each table differing
The field in table 064 which is positioned in no 1 is HIENR 01
The field in table 064 which is positioned in no 2 is HIENR 02
The field in table 064 which is positioned in no 3 is HIENR 03
and the most important thing here is exclusive indicator ticked in all the steps exept the last step
That means if at hierarchy level 1 system finds a record then it stops searching
I have a feeling that your access sequence alignmemt must be wrong somewhere and check for exclusive indicator marking
Moreover importantly if there is condition type in a PP then if a condition record is maintained if the same is not picked up in sales order then analysis has to give some hint and what is the hint you are getting
Regards
raja

Error with stored procedure block datasource

Hi all,
I tried to base a datablock on a stored procedure in order to get better runtime performance. I work with Forms Builder 6i with patch 17 , and our database is oracle 8.1.7.1.4
But when compiling I got errors.
Here are what I did :
create or replace type TSourceObject as object(name varchar2(30), propname varchar2(200));
create or replace type TSourceTable is table of TSourceObject;
create or replace procedure p_query_ntwk_chnl_mirror(p_tab IN OUT NOCOPY TSourceTable, p_action varchar2, p_lien number)
is
begin
if p_action = 'VISU' then
select TSourceObject(B.bdw_name, P.prop_bdw_name)
bulk collect into p_tab
from T_NETWORK_CHANNEL N, t_bdw_mw B, t_prop_bdw_mw P
where B.comp_bdw = P.comp_bdw and P.comp_prop_bdw = N.comp_prop_bdw
and EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM t_channel_element C
WHERE N.comp_network_channel = C.comp_network_channel and comp_lien = p_lien);
else
select TSourceObject(B.bdw_name, P.prop_bdw_name)
bulk collect into p_tab
from T_NETWORK_CHANNEL N, t_bdw_mw B, t_prop_bdw_mw P
where B.comp_bdw = P.comp_bdw and P.comp_prop_bdw = N.comp_prop_bdw;
end if;
end;
Then I created the datablock with the wizard , I entered correctly the value of the arguments for the table type name, the argument p_action and the argument p_lien.
And when compiling there was this alert error :
Compiling QUERY-PROCEDURE trigger on NETWORK_CHANNEL_MIRROR data block...
Compilation error on QUERY-PROCEDURE trigger on NETWORK_CHANNEL_MIRROR data block:
PL/SQL ERROR 960 at line 5, column 9
RPCs cannot use variables with schema level user-defined types in this release
PL/SQL ERROR 0 at line 5, column 9
Item ignored
PL/SQL ERROR 320 at line 7, column 26
the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
PL/SQL ERROR 0 at line 7, column 1
Statement ignored
PL/SQL ERROR 320 at line 8, column 28
the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
PL/SQL ERROR 0 at line 8, column 1
Statement ignored
Compilation errors have occurred.
So what should I do ?
Thank you very much indeed.

I create the package , and when creating the body then there was an error.
Here is the package :
create or replace package pkg_query_ntwrk_chnl_mirror
is
type TSourceObject is record(name varchar2(30), propname varchar2(200));
type TSourceTable is table of TSourceObject index by binary_integer;
procedure p_query_ntwk_chnl_mirror(p_tab IN OUT NOCOPY pkg_query_ntwrk_chnl_mirror.TSourceTable, p_action varchar2, p_lien number);
end;
create or replace package body pkg_query_ntwrk_chnl_mirror
is
procedure p_query_ntwk_chnl_mirror(p_tab IN OUT NOCOPY pkg_query_ntwrk_chnl_mirror.TSourceTable, p_action varchar2, p_lien number)
is
begin
if p_action = 'VISU' then
     select B.bdw_name, P.prop_bdw_name
     bulk collect into p_tab
     from T_NETWORK_CHANNEL N, t_bdw_mw B, t_prop_bdw_mw P
     where B.comp_bdw = P.comp_bdw and P.comp_prop_bdw = N.comp_prop_bdw
     and EXISTS (SELECT 1
     FROM t_channel_element C
     WHERE N.comp_network_channel = C.comp_network_channel and comp_lien = p_lien);
else
     select B.bdw_name, P.prop_bdw_name
     bulk collect into p_tab
     from T_NETWORK_CHANNEL N, t_bdw_mw B, t_prop_bdw_mw P
     where B.comp_bdw = P.comp_bdw and P.comp_prop_bdw = N.comp_prop_bdw;
end if;
end;
end;
And here is the error :
7/2 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
8/20 PLS-00597: expression 'P_TAB' in the INTO list is of wrong type
15/2 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
16/20 PLS-00597: expression 'P_TAB' in the INTO list is of wrong type
And what is the problem here ? I think it is right!

Error with internet plug-in message and blocked plugin

On my MacBook Air Im receiving a error with internet plug-in message and blocked plugin which will not allow video clips to play i.e. YouTube. How do I correct this?

When you have installed the latest version of Flash, relaunch Safari and test.
If you're getting a "blocked plug-in" error, then in System Preferences… ▹ Flash Player ▹ Advanced
click Check Now. Quit and relaunch your browser, but check this also:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5655?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US which also covers ‘blocked plug-in’.

V-41 tcode error :Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00

Hi All,
I am trying to create a BDC using the transaction V-41.
The first screen has fields:
ConditionType and Table, where I have to fill values ZPM1 and 800 respectively.
But as soon as I enter the tcode v-41 and say enter, the above mentioned fields are already having the values 'PR00' and ' 304'. Normally if you take an example fo t-code VA02, all fields are blank.
Then an error message is displayed:
Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
This behaviour is not allowing me to use the BDC feature.
Please advise me on why this is happening. What are the possible solutions I can use to clear these values programmatically?
Can anything be done via customizing?
Regards,
Namita.

Dear ILHAN ,
Well the problem you are facing is having the following solution:
Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
Message no. VK024
Diagnosis
The selected condition type does not fit in the condition table, that is the basis for the condition record. Alternatively the selected condition type is not included in the condition types that were selected on the selection screen or that are defined in the variant of the standard selection report.
Procedure
Úse F4 help to choose a valid condition type.
If this does not give you the required condition type, check in Customizing for condition types and the related access sequences.
In the condition maintenance also check Customizing for the selection report (pricing report), that you have selected in the navigation tree, using the standard condition table as a reference.
I hope this helps.
It has worked for me.
I gave it a try and what I am getting using the transaction V-41 is create Price condition (PR00) : Fast Entry.
Please award points if you find it useful.
Regards,
Rakesh

How to cause a "Completed with errors" map condition?

Our application testers asked me how to replicate a "Completed with errors" map condition, so they can verify that our application reports and handles this correctly. I've been able to generate "Completed with warnings" (create records with duplicate keys) and "Failed" conditions (drop a source table), but not "Completed with errors". Anyone know of a way to produce this condition?
Thanks!
Steve Locke

Hi Steve
It depends on your 'Maximum Number of Errors' configuration property. By default this value is 50, so its highly likely you are running set based and you have used the default number of errors (50) and the error count after the run is 1 so you have the status completed with warnings. If you change the maximum number of errors to 0, you will complete with errors if there are any errors at all.
Cheers
David

Set "E" for V1801 Message: Pricing error: Mandatory condition ZR01 missing

Dear All,
I want to set below error message to appear as ERROR.
Right now this message appear as a GREEN Color message. Therefore user can save the sales order without pricing.
My requirement is to BLOCK the user from entering a sales order in to the system without pricing. (Not even a incomplete order)
Message
Pricing error: Mandatory condition ZR01 is missing
Message no. V1801
Please note I have done following configurations.
- I have set ZR01 condition as MANDATORY in my pricing procedure. - B'se it's the price for the material
- I have set "Manual Entry not possible" for this condition type - Price should always pick from VK11, User should not be able to enter manually.
If Price is not there, user should not be able to create a SO.
NOTE:
In the transaction OVAH, I cant see this message no to set as E.
even in SE91, I don't see a place to set the message type.
Is there any other way to set this message as "E" & to prevent user from entering a SO to the system without price???
Appreciate your help !

Dear Senya,
Your suggestion works really fine with me.
It didn't make that message an ERROR message type. But it prevents user saving any incomplete document, where in my case it's pricing. So user has to complete the pricing in order to save it.
Thanks a lot for the help !
All others, thanks a lot for your suggestions !!!
Edited by: Anupa Wijesinghe on Aug 10, 2009 6:41 AM

UPDATE multiple columns with conditional SET parameters

I have a procedure that updates multiple columns of a table using the procedure's parameter. Is it possible to have one update statement with conditional SET parameter?
CREATE TABLE TEMP
(POL_NUM NUMBER,
OED DATE,
TERM NUMBER,
TRANS_CD CHAR(2));
INSERT INTO TEMP VALUES (1, '1 AUG 2009', 12, 'NB');
INSERT INTO TEMP VALUES (2, '4 AUG 2009', 12, 'XL');
INSERT INTO TEMP VALUES (3, '2 AUG 2009', 12, 'RN');
COMMIT;
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TMP_PROC (
pPOL_NUM NUMBER,
pOED IN DATE,
pTERM IN NUMBER,
pTRANS_CD CHAR2)
AS
BEGIN
IF pOED IS NOT NULL THEN
    UPDATE TEMP SET OED = pOED WHERE POL_NUM = pPOL_NUM;
END IF;
IF pTERM IS NOT NULL THEN
    UPDATE TEMP SET TERM = pTERM WHERE POL_NUM = pPOL_NUM;
END IF;
IF pTRAN_CD IS NOT NULL THEN
    UPDATE TEMP SET TRANS_CD = pTRANS_CD WHERE POL_NUM = pPOL_NUM;
END IF;
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
     NULL;
END;Is it possible to replace multiple IFs from the code to have only one UPDATE statement with condition that update the column only if the passed parameter is not null? In real scenario I have more than 3 columns and I don't want to write many IF blocks.
Please help Gurus!!
Edited by: Kuul13 on Sep 18, 2009 1:26 PM

Hi,
You certainly don't want to issue separate UPDATE statements for every column; that will be really inefficent.
SQL has several ways to implement IF-THEN-ELSE logic. CASE is the most versatile, but NVL will do everything you need for this job. You can use one of those to set a column to itself (and therefore not really update that column) when appropriate.
For example:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TMP_PROC (
pPOL_NUM   IN       NUMBER,
pOED          IN   DATE,
pTERM          IN   NUMBER,
pTRANS_CD IN       CHAR
AS
BEGIN
     UPDATE temp
     SET     oed      = NVL (poed,       oed)
     ,     term      = NVL (pterm,       term)
     ,     trans_cd = NVL (ptrans_cd, trans_cd)
     WHERE     pol_num      = ppol_num;
COMMIT;     -- Maybe
END    tmp_proc;"EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN NULL" is almost always a bad idea. If there's an error, don't you want to know about it? Shouldn't you at least log a message in a warnings table or something?
Think careflully about whether or not you want to COMMIT every time you call this procedure.
Just as it's inefficient to issue a separate UPDATE statement for every column, it's also inefficient to issue a separate UPDATE statement for every row. If efficiency is important, it should be possible to UPDATE several rows in a single UPDATE statement, using NVL (or CASE, or COALESCE, or NULLIF, or NVL2, or ...).
This was a very well-written question! Thanks for providing the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, and such a clear explanation.

I receive the error: Unable to load block component C:\Program Files\Hyperception\VABINF\KeyRcv.dll

I have two Major issues with our Infinity Project computers,
We have one entire lab that is getting this error... "Unable to load
block component C:\Program Files\Hyperception\VABINF\KeyRcv.dll.
Please verify that the component exists and any dependencies it may
have are satisfied." It is also producing this error with
NumEntry.dll. Both files exist. I am not sure what
dependencies these files may have. Ideas?
We have several systems that are giving the following error on one of
our labs... "You have exceeded the number of block functions allowed by
VAB for Infinity; contact Hyperception regarding upgrades." From
what The professor here at UTA told me when I first took on this
project, this was a problem that we had on the previous boards and that
someone at Hyperception was able to help us resolve this problem.
Can you help out with these issues? The first one I need an answer today if possible.
Thanks,

We have seen this type of problem on some computers (we do not know why as of yet).The problem with missing blocks is very likely being caused by file permissions, and can be seen when non-administrators are using VAB software. To resolve this: 1. login as ADMINISTRATOR 2. run the command line script from a DOS prompt as shown below: cacls "C:\Program FIles\Hyperception\VABINF" /T /E /G Everyone:F It will scroll through the name of every file in the provided directory, and all subdirectories. This should reset every file, and allow the USER to access all files in VAB software. This should correct the problem. Regards,Steve

How to prevent duplication on a column with condition

Hello everyone,
I need some advice here. At work, we have an Oracle APEX app that allow user to add new records with the automatic increment decision number based on year and group name.
Says if they add the first record , group name AA, for year 2012, they get decision number AA 1 2013 as their displayed record casein the report page.
The second record of AA in 2013 will be AA 2 2013.
If they add about 20 records , it will be AA 20 2013.
The first record for 2014 will be AA 1 2014.
However, recently , we get a user complaint about two records from the same group name have the same decision number.
When I looked into the history table, and find that the time gap between 2 record is just about 0.1 seconds.
Besides, we have lookup table that allows admin user to update the Start Sequence number with the restraint that it has to be larger than the max number of the current group name of the current year.
This Start sequence number and group name is stored together in a table.
And in some other special case,user can add a duplicate decision number for related record. (this is a new function)
The current procedure logic to add new record on the application are
_Get max(decision_number) from record table with chosen Group Name and current year.
_insert into the record table the new entered record with decision number + 1
_ update sequence number to the just added decision number.
So rather than utitlising APEX built-in automatic table modification process, I write a procedure that combine all the three process.
I run some for loop to continuously execute this procedure, and it seems it can autotically generate new unique decision number with time gap about 0.1 second.
However, when I increase the number of entry to 200, and let two users run 100 each.
If the time gap is about 0.01 second, Duplicate decision numbers appear.
What can I do to prevent the duplication ?
I cannot just apply a unique constraint here even for all three columns with condition, as it can have duplicate value in some special condition. I don't know much about using lock and its impact.
This is the content of my procedure
create or replace
PROCEDURE        add_new_case(
--ID just use the trigger
p_case_title IN varchar2,
p_year IN varchar2,
p_group_name IN VARCHAR2,
--decisionnumber here
p_case_file_number IN VARCHAR2,
--active
p_user IN VARCHAR2
AS
default_value NUMBER;
    caseCount NUMBER;
seqNumber NUMBER;
previousDecisionNumber NUMBER;
BEGIN
--execute immediate q'[alter session set nls_date_format='dd/mm/yyyy']';
SELECT count(*)
        INTO caseCount
        FROM CASE_RECORD
        WHERE GROUP_ABBR = p_group_name
        AND to_number(to_char(create_date, 'yyyy')) = to_number(to_char(date_utils.get_current_date, 'yyyy'));
        SELECT max(decision_number)
        INTO previousDecisionNumber
        FROM CASE_RECORD
        WHERE GROUP_ABBR = p_group_name
        AND to_number(to_char(create_date, 'yyyy')) = to_number(to_char(date_utils.get_current_date, 'yyyy'));
        IF p_group_name IS NULL
        THEN seqNumber := 0;
        ELSE
        SELECT seq_number INTO seqNumber FROM GROUP_LOOKUP WHERE ABBREVATION = p_group_name;
        END IF;
    IF caseCount > 0 THEN
           default_value := greatest(seqNumber, previousdecisionnumber)+1;
    ELSE
           default_value := 1;
    END IF;
INSERT INTO CASE_RECORD(case_title, decision_year, GROUP_ABBR, decision_number, case_file_number, active_yn, created_by, create_date)
VALUES(p_case_title, p_year, p_group_name, default_value, p_case_file_number, 'Y', p_user, sysdate );
--Need to update sequence here also
UPDATE GROUP_LOOKUP
SET SEQ_NUMBER = default_value
WHERE ABBREVATION = p_group_name;
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
    logger.error(p_message_text => SQLERRM
                ,p_message_code => SQLCODE
                ,p_stack_trace => dbms_utility.format_error_backtrace
    RAISE;
END;
Many thanks in advance,
Ann

Why not using a sequence for populating the decision_number column ?
Sequence values are guaranteed to be unique so there's no need to lock anything.
You'll inevitably have gaps and no different groups will have the same decision_number in common.
Having to deal with consecutive numbers fixations you can proceed as
with
case_record as
(select 2012 decision_year,'AA' group_abbr,1 decision_number from dual union all
select 2012,'BB',2 from dual union all
select 2012,'AA',21 from dual union all
select 2012,'AA',22 from dual union all
select 2012,'BB',25 from dual union all
select 2013,'CC',33 from dual union all
select 2013,'CC',34 from dual union all
select 2013,'CC',36 from dual union all
select 2013,'BB',37 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',38 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',39 from dual union all
select 2013,'BB',41 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',42 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',43 from dual union all
select 2013,'BB',45 from dual
select decision_year,
       group_abbr,
       row_number() over (partition by decision_year,group_abbr order by decision_number) decision_number,
       decision_number sequence_number -- not shown (noone needs to know you're using a sequence)
from case_record
order by decision_year,group_abbr,decision_number
DECISION_YEAR
GROUP_ABBR
DECISION_NUMBER
SEQUENCE_NUMBER
2012
AA
1
1
2012
AA
2
21
2012
AA
3
22
2012
BB
1
2
2012
BB
2
25
2013
AA
1
38
2013
AA
2
39
2013
AA
3
42
2013
AA
4
43
2013
BB
1
37
2013
BB
2
41
2013
BB
3
45
2013
CC
1
33
2013
CC
2
34
2013
CC
3
36
for retrieval (assuming decision_year,group_abbr,decision_number as being the key):
select decision_year,group_abbr,decision_number -- the rest of columns
from (select decision_year,
               group_abbr,
-- the rest of columns
               row_number() over (partition by decision_year,group_abbr order by decision_number) decision_number
          from case_record
         where decision_year = :decision_year
           and group_abbr = :group_abbr
where decision_number = :decision_number
DECISION_YEAR
GROUP_ABBR
DECISION_NUMBER
2013
AA
4
if that's acceptable
Regards
Etbin

Error in the procedure block

Hi ,
I'm getting the error in the following block..
Could you please give a hint to solve this
Solved
Thank you
Edited by: Smile on Feb 19, 2013 2:04 AM

What does a weakly typed ref cursor have to do with any of this?
Cursor loops, of the type you appear to be trying to write have been obsolete this entire decade.
Please to go http://tahiti.oracle.com and look up BULK COLLECT and FORALL.
Demos here:
http://www.morganslibrary.org/library.html

Purchase requisition with reference to blocked sales order

Hello,
we are creating purchase requisitions (PR) manually with reference to a sales order (account assignment Z). When this sales order is blocked, we still can issue the purchase requistion.
What can we do to avoid this? I think in 2 solutions:
- use enhancement MEREQ001 to show error message when SO is blocked, so PR is not created. Is this possible?
- create a release strategy for PR created in that plant (tr. OME6). The problem is that release strategy refers to an amount in the PO, and not to other factor, like SO blocked. Maybe in the former enhancement we can set the field EBAN-GSFRG to 'X'?
Thanks for your help.

Many thanks for your answer. It help me to solve the issue.
So applying note 738171, with transaction OVB5 (or VOFM, requirements->subsequent functions->Purch.requisitions) we create one new requirement, ie RV07A900, and then we apply the rule that if we have delivery or billing block, that is, VBAK-LIFSK or VBAK-FAKSK not empty, then we set an error with a code similar to this:
            da_sy-msgid = 'Z1'.    (message class)
            da_sy-msgno = '001'. (message number)
            error_exception = true.
and then the PR is not created.
Regards.

Pricing error: Mandatory condition ZPRI is missing

Hi,
When creating a credit memo request with reference to the original order we get the error: Pricing error: Mandatory condition ZPRI is missing.
Checking in Analysis we get following information:
"The condition is set as an automatic condition without access sequence. Stored condition formulas may deactivate the condition.
Example: In the case of the NRAB free goods condition the minimum amount is not reached. In this case the condition is deactivated using the base value calculation formula 029."
The condition type (statistical price) is setup not to be maintained manually and we want to keep it this way.
As no access sequence exist I do not know how to add a condition record.
I am also unable to trace any condition formulas.
I have checked other credit memo requests for this sales area and none of them have ZPRI in their pricing analysis.
Could anyone help me out?
Let me know if you need more information.
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Geert

Hi
Can you check the pricing procedure that is triggered in the Credit memo by going to Pricing analysis..
kinly check and maintain the same.
Regards
Damu

"ERROR: Could not read block 64439 of relation 1663/16385/16658: Result too large"

Hi,
I've already archived a lot of assets in my final cut server but since one week there is a message appearing when I click on an asset and choose "Archive". The pop-up says: "ERROR: Could not read block 64439 of relation 1663/16385/16658: Result too large"
Does anyone know what's the problem and/or have any suggestions to solve my problem?! I can't archive anymore since the first appearance of this message.
What happened before?
-> I archived some assets via FCS and then transfered the original media to an offline storage media. That system worked fine for the last months and my normal server stays quit small in storage use. But now, after I added some more new productions and let FCS generate the assets, it doesn't work anymore...
It's not about the file size - I tried even the smallest file I found in some productions.
It's not a particular production - I tried some different productions.
It's not about the storage - there's a lot of storage left on my server.
So, if someone knows how get this server back on the road - let me know.
THNX!
Chris

I would really appreciate some advice re: recent FCS search errors.
We're having similar issues to C.P.CGN's 2 year old post, it's only developed for us in the last few weeks.
Our FCS machine is running 10.6.8 mac os and 1.5.2 final cut server with the latest
OS 10.6.x updates.
FCS is still usable for 6 of 8 offliners, but on some machines, searching assets presents "ERROR: could not read block 74012 of relation1663/16385/16576: Input/output error."
Assuming the OS and/or data drives on the FCS machine were failing, I cloned the database drive today and will clone the OS drive tomorrow night, but after searching the forums and seeing similar error messages I'm not so sure.
FCS has been running fine for last 4 years, minus the recent Java security issues.
Thanks in advance, any ideas appreciated!
cheers,
Aaron Mooney,
Post Production Supervisor.
Electric Playground Daily, Reviews On The Run Daily, Greedy Docs.
epn.tv

BPE Error with condition in block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for