BPM - Exception not thrown

Hi ,
I created a BPM in which I I have
Receive Step -> Send Step -> Block Step ->
Block Processing branch - Receive Step ->Send Step
Block Dead Line Branch - Dead line of 1 minute and Control step for raising exception
Block Exception handler branch - Control step for cancelling the process.
My requirement is that, When I receive the first message and within 1 minute if I DO NOT receive the second message the process should be cancelled(Error in SXMB_MONI).
Right now the process simply waits for ever for the second message and the process is never Cancelled.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Nazim

Nazim,
Try this.
- Click on the Block Step, in the Properties window give some exception name.
- Now in the Deadline branch Keep Control Step.
- Click on the Control Step , choose Action Throw Exception and choose the exception you gave for block step.
- Remember don't use exception branch, Coz as per your requirement you want to fail the BPM, if you use exception branch then it means again you are catching that. Hence don't use exception branch.
raj.

Similar Messages

Why is exception not thrown in AseCommand when "Truncation error occurred"?

In the below SQL, data is written to SOURCE and from there to TARGET.
The DECIMAL columns in TARGET are deliberately smaller than those in SOURCE (eg a DECIMAL (12, 2) column populated from a DECIMAL (19,11) source).
When I run this in an Query tool (eg, SqlDbx) I get the messages:
"Truncation error occurred
Command has been aborted"
But when I run this using the .net Client (supplied with the Developer Edition of ASE 16.0) no exception is thrown (the INSERT fails though). The method is AseCommand.ExecuteNonQuery().
Is this deliberate?
Is this believed to be correct?
How can I tell that a truncation error has been raised?
Thanks
IF OBJECT_ID ('dbo.TARGET') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE dbo.TARGET
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.TARGET
S_Name_NVARCHAR NVARCHAR (50) null,
    S_RedComponent_DEC_15_6 decimal(15, 6) NULL,
    S_BlueComponent_DEC_12_2 decimal(12, 2) NULL,
    S_GreenComponent_DEC_18_10 decimal(18, 10) NULL
GO
IF OBJECT_ID ('dbo.SOURCE') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE dbo.SOURCE
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.SOURCE
Name_NVARCHAR      NVARCHAR (2000) NULL,
RedComponent_DEC   DECIMAL (19,11) NULL,
GreenComponent_DEC DECIMAL (19,11) NULL,
BlueComponent_DEC DECIMAL (19,11) NULL
GO
INSERT INTO dbo.SOURCE (Name_NVARCHAR, RedComponent_DEC, GreenComponent_DEC, BlueComponent_DEC)
VALUES ('Beige', 272.195, 272.195, 244.42)
GO
INSERT INTO dbo.SOURCE (Name_NVARCHAR, RedComponent_DEC, GreenComponent_DEC, BlueComponent_DEC)
VALUES ('Bisque', 283.305, 253.308, 217.756)
GO
INSERT INTO dbo.SOURCE (Name_NVARCHAR, RedComponent_DEC, GreenComponent_DEC, BlueComponent_DEC)
VALUES ('Black', 0, 0, 0)
GO
INSERT INTO dbo.SOURCE (Name_NVARCHAR, RedComponent_DEC, GreenComponent_DEC, BlueComponent_DEC)
VALUES ('BlanchedAlmond', 283.305, 261.085, 227.755)
GO
--Is there data to migrate?
SELECT LEFT( S.Name_NVARCHAR,8000),S.GreenComponent_DEC,S.GreenComponent_DEC,S.GreenComponent_DEC
FROM (
SELECT * FROM SOURCE
) S
--Yes.migrate away!
--Next line gives a truncation error occurred in Sybase (gives a truncation error occurred in a query tool
--but fails silently in AseCommand.ExecuteNonQuery).
INSERT dbo.TARGET (S_Name_NVARCHAR,S_RedComponent_DEC_15_6,S_BlueComponent_DEC_12_2,S_GreenComponent_DEC_18_10)
SELECT LEFT( S.Name_NVARCHAR,8000),S.GreenComponent_DEC,S.GreenComponent_DEC,S.GreenComponent_DEC
FROM (
SELECT * FROM SOURCE
) S
select * from dbo.TARGET

Hi Dave,
I am consulting internally on this. To my understanding, this behavior is based on the ASE severity level, as returned in the TDS_EED token. AseExceptions are thrown when severity level is 11 or higher.
Our docs are not explanatory in this regard. Once I get clarification we will provide something in the form of wiki or KBA or doc bug to further explain the detail. Apologize for the delay and problems this caused. I guess since the command is aborted by ASE, therefore no insertion occurs, even though ASE indicates truncation occurs prior - makes this confusing.
The message severity, etc is controlled by ASE and the client is just following suit according to the TDS spec. Its just lacking in the client docs. This can be remedied.
ASE does provide the option to allow truncation and not abort. It's a set command:
Enter a query:
1 > set arithabort numeric_truncation off
Enter a query:
1 > INSERT dbo.TARGET (S_Name_NVARCHAR,S_RedComponent_DEC_15_6,S_BlueComponent_DEC_12_2,S_GreenComponent_DEC_18_10) SELECT LEFT( S.Name_NVARCHAR,8000),S.GreenComponent_DEC,S.GreenComponent_DEC,S.GreenComponent_DEC FROM (SELECT * FROM SOURCE
) S
4 rows Affected.
Notice though ASE does NOT send truncation message. This is when it is well known and accepted to insert and truncate the numeric data.
Cheers,
-Paul

Exception not thrown on Key Exists

using c# api:
I have a Btree DB configured with two secondary DB's and a custom comparer, I have initialized the DB with 'DuplicatesPolicy.NONE'. To my understanding this should cause an exception to be raised if I try to enter a duplicate. On Put(), I get no such exception.
Why? Am I supposed to throw this from comparer? (Actually tried this but it looks like it leaves cursor in undefined state). How Do I get the KeyExists Exception to be raised when a key exists???
To my understadning I cannot use PutNoDuplicate() as a primary with secondaries cannot have duplicates configured, and you can only use PutNoDuplicate if there is a sorted duplicate policy...
Any suggestions?

Hi,
The documentation could be a little misleading here. If you specify DuplicatesPolicy.NONE for a database, then duplicates will not be allowed in the database, and when trying to put a key/data pair in the database when the key already exist will fail:
"Insertion when the key of the key/data pair being inserted already exists in the database will fail. "
Failing here means that there will be no duplicate created, without any exception being thrown as the default behavior is to "Store the key/data pair in the database, replacing any previously existing key if duplicates are disallowed"; see the Database.Put() methods (BTreeDatabase extends from / is a sub-class of Database).
You should use the PutNoOverwrite method. When the key that your are trying to insert already exists in the database, you will get a KeyExistException exception.
Regards,
Andrei

Model - level exceptions not thrown (EJB, 11.1.1.3)

Hi,
We noticed that with the latest jdev version (11.1.1.3) exceptions from model layer are not thrown or logged anywhere. Steps to reproduce (HR schema):
- create a new Application (J2EE template, add ADF Faces and Page Flow to view project)
- create Entities from tables (Department and Employee)
- create a session bean
- add this method
    public void test() {
        Employee emp = null;
        emp.getDepartment();
        System.out.println("test");
    }- expose it through local interface
- create a data control from the session bean
- create a new jspx page, and drag&drop the test() method as a button
- run the project and click the button.
No exceptions in the console, the only thing I was able to find is this Info in DefaultServer.log
####<May 27, 2010 12:02:03 PM CEST> <Info> <EJB> <myMachine> <DefaultServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '8' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <BEA1-0004EFF816A89E472B1E> <583c10bfdbd326ba:-226d29eb:128d928460d:-7ffd-00000000000000a0> <1274954523439> <BEA-010227> <EJB Exception occurred during invocation from home or business: [email protected]1 threw exception: java.lang.NullPointerException> This is a MAJOR issue, it makes development practically impossible. If there isn't any workaround, we are going back to 11.1.1.2 until next release.
I can send a test case if anyone is interested.
Pedja

We have identified the problem, but right now the fix is planned for a later release.
If this is an urgent/important problem for you, I would suggest that you open a service request with Oracle support and see if you can get a patch for this, or provide a higher priority for this issue.

Exceptions not thrown on interrupted SocketChannel.write()

I just noticed a behaviour of java.nio.channels.SocketChannel.write() that makes me wonder. If write() blocks(), and the channel is closed during this blocking by another thread, AsynchronousCloseException should be thrown.
However, in most cases this does not happen in my little test app. If any part of the data passed to write() has already been written to TCP before the socket was closed, write() returns without exception.
Similar behaviour is observed with intterupting. If the thread blocked in write() is interrupted by another thread, it returns immediately and has the interrupted Flag set, but in most cases no Exception is thrown.
ClosedByInterruptException is only thrown if not any part of the data passed to write() has been passed to TCP.
Is this a bug or a feature ?

Yes, i'm pretty sure that it blocks. In my test, the server just accepts the connection and then goes to sleep for a looooong time. The client just connects, and sends 10Meg of fata in one write() call. If i do not interrupt the client, it blocks as long as the server sleeps. In this case, this is the client's stack while blocking:
Thread [main] (Suspended)
     FileDispatcher.write0(FileDescriptor, long, int) line: not available [native method]
     SocketDispatcher.write(FileDescriptor, long, int) line: 29
     IOUtil.writeFromNativeBuffer(FileDescriptor, ByteBuffer, long, NativeDispatcher, Object) line: 104
     IOUtil.write(FileDescriptor, ByteBuffer, long, NativeDispatcher, Object) line: 75
     SocketChannelImpl.write(ByteBuffer) line: 334
     Channels.write(WritableByteChannel, ByteBuffer) line: 60
     Channels.access$000(WritableByteChannel, ByteBuffer) line: 47
     Channels$1.write(byte[], int, int) line: 134
     Channels$1(OutputStream).write(byte[]) line: 58
     SocketClient.main(String[]) line: 75     If i start another thread before calling write(), that closes the socket after 3 seconds, the following happens: The call of IOUtil.write() returns ( with a value n that i cannot see in the debugger ), This value n is tested inside SocketChannelImpl.write() via (n > 0 || (n == IOStatus.UNAVAILABLE), what return true. For that reason, AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(boolean), does not throw an exception.
Once the server wakes up later, it is able to read about 200K from the socket...
I tried this on a linux system (kernel 2.6.17, glibc 2.4) with jdk 1.6.0_03. I'm now gonna try it under windows, hold on..
Of course, if anybody is interested, i'll post the test proggy...

Wait - interrupt Why Exception not thrown?

Hello. I expected that calling interrupt() on a waiting thread should result in InterruptedException thrown by wait(). Nevertheless, in the code below no Exception is thown as if there were no interrupt() call. Actually this snippet prints the same output irregardless of whether interrupt() is called.
public class Runner {
    synchronized public void foo(){
        System.out.println("before wait in foo()");
        try {
            wait();
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            System.out.println("InterruptedException");
            e.printStackTrace();
        System.out.println("after wait in foo()");
    synchronized public void bar(){
        System.out.println("before sleep in bar()");
        try {
            Thread.sleep(10000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        System.out.println("after sleep in bar()");
        notify();
        System.out.println("after notify in bar()");
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        final Runner runner = new Runner();
        Thread t1 = new Thread(new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                runner.foo();
        Thread t2 = new Thread(new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                runner.bar();
        t1.start();
        t2.start();
        try {
            Thread.sleep(5000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        t1.interrupt();
        System.out.println("t1 interrupted");
}

Thanks for your response.
Still the whole thing is not clear to me.
Why InterruptedException is not deterministic in this
case?
Where is the ?non-deterministic? code in this
example?The fact that t1.start() is written before t2.start() in you code does not guarantee that foo() method will always be called first. Either the bar() method or foo() method can be invoked firstly, because this is how threads work in Java. Try to invert: put t2.start() before t1.start(), and see what happens. Probably the exception will be thrown in this case, but this behaviour is still non deterministic.
Please pay attention to timing -
t1.interrupt() is called in about 5 seconds after
both threads are started, at the time when one thread
is in sleep(10000) and the other in wait(). I believe
that above condition may be taken for granted taking
in account 5 seconds interval between calls.You know that when you invoke the notify() method inside the bar method() you are making the foo() method not waiting anymore, don?t you? Therefore, if foo() method is called firstly, then the InterruptedException probably won?t be thrown. I said "probably" because the behaviour is non deterministic. Time is relative. If your processor is fast, then probably the exception will never be thrown, but you will never be completely sure. Maybe if there are other executions using your processor, then the processor might be slow for your program, and then the InterruptedException might be thrown. If you want to make your program have the same behaviour always, then you have to use semaphore variables, that indicate when exactly one thread is permitted to run.

Row concurrency exception not thrown for 1 page but others

All pages have the default of true for enableTokeValidation.
Edit a page -> Save -> Browser Back Button -> Click on Save button
For all but one of our pages, we will successfuly get the JboException for row concurrency is inconsistent, which is what we need/hope for.
The one page that does not give this exception is dedicated to "create" a person. After creation, it will navigate to a list name page. If back button is used and the user then click on the "Save" button on this new person page, ADF layer acutally tries to update the person for one field for the last created person. We are expecting the row concurrency exception.
I have check and read all the thread on back buttons. And the consistent of the entity/view object used by this one page versus the rest.
Note: All of our pages are using "redirect" navigation.
Thanks,
Mel

One important different I should mention is that
- the new person page is using a different application module A than the rest
- all the other maintaining page is using application module B
Is this why? How to make it work?
Mel

Exception is thrown "mydb is not bound"(needs urgent help)

We r three students and our final project is a BPM(Business peocess Management)system.
BPM is actually a workflow system(managing the business processes)and all the rules and constraints are applied from the Rule Management System.
we have started the implementation, and therefore we need some help related to the implementation.
We r using EJB2.0 with JBuilder9, JBoss3.2 as the application server and tomcate as the web server.
problem:
I want to create manual database connection using DataSource,
I am using mysql and database name is mydb.
I have done all the reqiured configration of mysql with Joss and it is working.
After getting the initial context, when i try to lookup the datasource, exception is thrown "mydb is not bound"
Initial context is correct because i have tried entity beans asd it works well.
code is
Hashtable contextValues = new Hashtable();
contextValues.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "jnp://loopback:1099");
contextValues.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
"org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory");
Context context = new InitialContext(contextValues);
context.lookup("java://mydb");
Kindly help me if u find time,
regards!

try java:comp/env/jdbc/mydb or java:comp/env/mydb

How to fail messsages when timeout exception is thrown in BPM?

Hi
In my BPM, if the time out exception is thrown in BPM, in SXMB_MONI, all the inbound messages' staus is 'processed sucessfully' ? How can I make the message fail? With a red flag or anything indicating exception?
In my design I used deadline branch to throw time out exception.And in the exception branch I used control step to cancel the process.

Hi,
In my design I used deadline branch to throw time out exception.And in the exception branch I used control step to cancel the process
If this is what you have designed then increasing the timeout using the above mentioned blogs doesn't seem to be logical:) (BPM will throw the error when the deadline is meet....can't understand how by increasing timeout will help you)....instead of increasing the timeout you can increase the time limit mentioned in the deadline branch itself to ensure that your message will be processed in that particular time limit.
Since you have reached the timeout it means that desired message processing has failed so better you raise an alert instead of going for a increase in timeout....increasing timeout decreases performance...
Regards,
Abhishek.

Exception logged but not thrown on invocation of webservice (BEA-000905)

Using webservices.jar that comes with Weblogic SP3 and ant task clientgen to build the client, I got this warning on console:
<14/Abr/2005 16H00m BST> <Warning> <Net> <BEA-000905> <Could not open connection with host: localhost and port: 7777.>
Of course, weblogic is right, localhost:7777 is not listening, but the problem is that the application does not know this, since no exception is thrown. I'm catching for a Throwable and I get nothing. This is severe because I'm changing the state of some records in a DB table if the invocation of the webservice is OK, i.e., if no exception is thrown. But there really is a connection exception...
Can anyone help?

Just to clarify: the warning is logged when invoking a webservice and the target machine is down. I'm sniffing the communication through localhost:7777 (so this is the target machine for the invocation), and then it redirects the request to the machine where the webservice is hosted.
I was expecting to catch an exception like IOException or RemoteException, or even a custom exception that I defined in the throws clause of the webservice method.

Exception is thrown or not

What should I do to ensure that a certian part of my code is always excuted whether an exception is thrown or not?

Put it in a finally section and the code that might throw in the preceding try block.
Chuck

Exception is not thrown immediately in Hibernate 3. Why??

I am using Hibernate 3.
If I execute "session.update" and the update is not successful (e.g. value too large), the exception is not thrown immediately.
For example,
System.out.println ("pass 1");
session.update(dataBean) ;
System.out.println ("pass 2");
session.getTransaction().commit();
System.out.println ("pass 3");
I find if session.update(dataBean) fails, "pass 1" and "pass 2" are printed but "pass 3" is not printed. That meams Hibernate will not throw exception until I execute "commit". Can I force it to throw immediately (i.e. only "pass 1" will be printed) ?
Thanks in advance.

O/R mappers such as Hibernate and JDO generally defer communications with the database for as long as possible; for an insert or update transaction that will be until commit().
This is for several reasons:
1) general efficiency - a series of update() calls may modify the same attribute of an object multiple times; it's substantially more efficient to update the database just once
2) database efficiency - when a transaction is in progress, even when nothing is occuring in that transaction, more resources are consumed inthe database than when no transaction is active. For example, if a transaction updates a row and then 10 minutes later commits, then during that interval the database has to keep track of 2 different versions of that row and know which connections see which version of the row.
3) connection management - DB connections are expensive resources and once a transaction has started updating the DB, it has to tie up a connection for the duration.
In other words, no matter how long it takes to set up your transaction in Java, a good O/R mapper is not going to begin a database transaction until the last possible moment, which is at commit().
Can I force it to throw immediatelyYou can call commit() any time you want.
It sounds like you want the database to do your input data validation for you. That's wrong. You need to validate input (for size, length, whatever) before you attempt to put it in the database.

Enable Audit on SCOM Agent An exception was thrown while processing Submit Tasks does not have sufficient permission to perform the operation.

Hi All,
An exception was thrown while processing Submit Tasks Domain\"SDK Account" does not have sufficient permission to perform the operation.
am getting this error when try to enable audit in one of Domain controllers.

Dear Mark,
i face similar problem before, i had resolve it be adding SDK service account to Operation Manager Administration group.
Regards, Ibrahim Hamdy

Exceptions from nested includes not thrown to errorPage

In our application a central dispatcher servlet includes JSPs.
          These JSPs include other JSPs. When an Exception is thrown from one of these
          pages it is not thrown, even when the error page is indicated in the
          included JSP with the page directive and the Exception is explicitly thrown
          from a catch block.
          I apprciate any thoughts.
          Thanks.
          -mc


can u send the code snippet?
"Abhishek" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hi
I am having a stateless session bean(SLBean) which uses a singleton
class(Single1). Both the SLBean and the Single1 are in the same jar
file. Single1 contains a static method called getInstance() which
returns the instance of the Single1(if not already existing).
The probelm is that when I try to do the "Single1.getInstance()" from
the stateless bean, then some exception( java.rmi.RemoteException:
EJBException: ;nested Exception is: Java.lang.NullPointerException) is
thrown.and getInstance() method of Single1 class in never invoked.
What might be the problem? why am I not able to call my singleton
class from the staless bean.
Thanks in advance.
Abhishek

Catch mapping error message in BPM Exception branch

Hi dudes,
Does anyone know how to catch the mapping runtime error message into a BPM exception branch? I know how to create an exception branch and how to trigger it, but I wonder whether it's possible to pass the mapping error message as shown in SXI_MONITOR (i.e. 'Cannot create target element XXXXX. Values missing in queue context').
Otherwise, everytime my BPM fails I will have to take the payload and run the mapping test in order to find out the reason of the error.
Many thanks in advance!
Paco

Thanks,
My problem is not about handling exception in BPM, but getting the mapping error description and then passing it to the exception branch.
I can see in the workflow log that this info is contained into the Exception container EXCEPTIONS[2] / T100MSG:
Message Class: SAI_MAPPING
Message Number: 217
Message Type: E
Message Variable: com/sap/xi/tf/_<MM name>
Message Variable: com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf7.IllegalInstanceExcepti
Message Variable: on: Cannot create target element /ns1:<path/field>.Message Variable: Values~
The text in bold is the one I am interested in to be get and mapped into the exception branch.

BPM - Exception not thrown

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for