Bridge display vs. PS display: don't match

A .jpg appeared too light in Bridge, so I darkened it. Looks great when opened in PS. Still looks too light when displayed in Bridge whether editing the image itself or rating the images in its folder.

Are you preserving the Metadata in the Bridge preference, specifically the color profile?
Are your color setting synchronized between the applications?

Similar Messages

ACR 6.3RC still makes Bridge display some TIFFs & JPGs overexposed

I had the same problem with TIFFs & JPGs after upgrading from ACR 6.1 to 6.2. My system is Win 7x64 and, of course, PsCS5 and Bridge 4.0.39. This time the upgrade was from ACR 6.1 to 6.3RC. Not all images are affected. The problem seems to be entirely random. The amount of overexposure seems to be in the order of 1 to 2 stops. The problem is limited in this way for me:
1. All the affected images display correctly exposed when opened in Ps and ACR 6.3RC (and ACR 6.2) hosted by Bridge.
2. Only TIFFs & JPGs (both B&W and Colour) "derived" ultimately from original TIFF scans (both B&W and Colour) made on a Nikon SuperCoolscan 5000 ED are affected. The original TIFF scans (99.99% are 16-bit) are all unaffected.
3. The problem does not occur with any TIFF or JPG file derived from native CRW or NEF raw files or from native JPG files produced in-camera (Canon EOS 300D and Nikon D700), all of which are themselves unaffected.
4. It does not matter were you might be in an image editing process. Some intermediate edits to TIFFs (I never make intermediate JPG edits) are affected, others are not. Editing might start with the TIFF and continue with edits to the TIFF, and only some of the subsequent TIFFs (or final JPGs derived from them) are affected. For example, there might be 6 distinct edits to a TIFF and only edits 3 through 6 are affected. Editing might procede immediately from the original TIFF scan to PSD, finalise with PSD, and then, AND sometimes only, any TIFF or JPG made from the final, flattened PSD produces a file which Bridge will display overexposed. Only some files in a batch of scans, all made at the same time and under exactly the same conditions (almost always with no adjustments made with the Nikon scanning software), are ever affected - never all of them.
5. Some of the edits to the original TIFF scans (where the edits were kept as TIFFs) were made with Picture Window Pro, some with Lightroom 1.3 (I think), some with ACR 4.x, ACR 5.x, but most were made with PS CS3, CS4 and CS5: it does not matter, there are some affected files from each. The problem certainly does occur with files which have never been opened, let alone edited, in any version of ACR.
6. I have several instances where simply making a copy of a TIFF scan in another folder (whether the copy was made by Bridge or with Windows Explorer has no influence) results in the copy only and not the original being displayed overexposed.
7. If a file is affected, all TIFFs AND all JPGs derived from it will be overexposed, never just one or the other.
The overexposure problem detailed above does not occur with ACR 6.1. All the files affected by ACR 6.2 and 6.3RC are displayed with correct exposure by Bridge when ACR 6.1 is installed.
I'm at a complete loss to understand what is going on. Any suggestions would be most welcome.
Has anyone else who was experiencing the Bridge/overexposure problem with either ACR 6.2 or 6.3RC found a solution?

This will be posted in both the ACR and Bridge User Forums
I've done some experimentation and found a workaround for, not the solution to, my problem with ACR 6.2 and 6.3RC causing Bridge to display random TIFFs and JPGs overexposed.
This is a temporary, and, if you have lots of affected files, a very laborious, individual file workaround. Unless Adobe investigates, finds and corrects the cause of the problem, it seems likely to re-occur. Only fixing the cause of the problem (which must lie in the new (different from ACR 6.1) code of ACR 6.2 and 6.3RC) could be be truly regarded as a solution.
Here is how I enabled Bridge to display my affected TIFFs and TPGs correctly, that is, with no amount of overexposure. These steps apply equally to B&W and Colour images.
For a 16-bit TIFF, duplicate it in Bridge (Edit/Duplicate) and then open the duplicate in ACR 6.2 or 6.3RC (ACR) hosted by Bridge. Make sure that all the sliders are zeroed in the Main panel and that the Amount slider in the Sharpening section of the Details panel is also set to zero (to avoid unwanted additional sharpening). Then open the image in Photoshop (Ps) and immediately save the image (Save As) over itself (yes, you're replacing the file) back in the folder from which you opened it into ACR, making sure to choose no compression. The resaved duplicate will now be displayed with its proper exposure in Bridge, and any further TIFFs or JPGs (whether 16-bit or 8-bit) derived from this file will also be displayed correctly. Following this procedure, my invariable experience is that I end up with a TIFF either the same size as or smaller than the affected TIFF.
Why no compression? Strangely, if you choose LZW compression (really the only logical alternative to "None") you end up with a larger file than you get with no compression. I have no idea why. Why not simply fix the affected file instead of a duplicate? No reason really, other than safety. If things go belly-up you still have your original, albeit, affected file. I also intend to keep my affected files for awhile just in case of some possible desire or need to re-examine them in the future.
For an 8-bit TIFF, although I don't have any which are affected, the procedure would be the same as for a 16-bit TIFF. You will need to conduct your own tests regarding compression/no compression and the resulting file size.
For a JPG, the procedure is pretty much the same (duplicating, opening in ACR, zeroing all sliders, opening in Ps and then saving over itself) but when saving try choosing Maximum Quality (12) which mostly, for me at least, produces a replacement JPG the same size as the original affected file. Of course, you can choose a greater level of compression if you wish, and my tests show that this will not adversely affect the outcome. You can use the replacement JPG to produce further, derivative 8-bit TIFFs or JPGs and all will display properly exposed in Bridge.

Suddenly, Bridge displays photo colors wrong

I've been using Photoshop Elements for several years--frequently--like almost daily. I'm currently using elements 6.0 with Bridge. I always view my photos in bridge before doing anything else. All of a sudden, starting last week, when I open a folder in bridge, I can see in the thumbnails that the colors are OK, but very shortly thereafter, and/or when I click a thumbnail to preview an image, it drastically changes the colors in both the thumbnails and the preview. Like--a bright red rose becomes a dull muted red. A deep purple flower becomes bright blue. It's driving me nuts. I can't find anything in Bridge preferences. I am not a user who knows a thing about "color profiles" or anything else--I tweak photos individually using fairly simple features in Elements (use the Levels tool, adjust brightness and contrast, once in a while futz with hue or intensity for the photo, stuff like that).
I haven't to my knowledge set anything globally. I haven't that I can recall installed any automatic update to the adobe products. I'm using the same camera, the same memory cards. I've never had this happen in hundreds upon hundreds of uses of bridge & photoshop, and many thousands of photos, and now it's doing it constantly.
A week or two ago I was futzing with hue & saturation on some individual photos, but that batch of photos was all fine and I didn't notice that it affected anything other than the photo I was working on. Could I have set something somewhere accidentally and never known it? I've searched the help for bridge & elements, searched the forums and found some similar questions but they don't seem to be the same situations.
Help me, Mr/Ms Wizards!

Elf1elf wrote:
…All of a sudden, starting last week, when I open a folder in bridge, I can see in the thumbnails that the colors are OK, but very shortly thereafter, and/or when I click a thumbnail to preview an image, it drastically changes the colors in both the thumbnails and the preview.
What you're seeing in Bridge is perfectly normal, expected behavior.
Initially, Bridge displays a thumbnail straight from the in-camera converted and embedded JPEG preview embedded in the raw file. Then, Bridge calls upon Adobe Camera Raw to build its own rendering from the raw data themselves. Because the rendering criteria for ACR are not designed to emulate the in-camera raw-to-JPEG conversion, there will be a definite change in the images.
I cannot speak to Elements because I don't use it, nor are most regular posters familiar with that very limited, emasculated application. We use the full, professional-level version of Photoshop. Elements is not the same as Photoshop. The differences are great and varied. Last year I did buy a license for Elements to use on a laptop, but successfully demanded my money back from Adobe.
If you're seeing a marked difference in the display of the thumbnail and the final rendering of the same after a few seconds, check your preferences. Make sure that the box labeled "Apply Auto Tone Adjustments" is NOT checked in the Camera Raw preferences. This will minimize the differences.
You may want to trash your Bridge preferences first by launching Bridge while you hold down the Option key. Then make sure the "Apply auto tone adjustments box" is NOT checked.
Whenever an application begins to act weirdly "suddenly", that's a sign of corrupted preferences that need to be trashed.

Bridge displays incorrect image previews! (Bridge 2.1.1.9)

Hello,
I am running Bridge CS3 2.1.1.9 on Windows XP SP2 fully patched. I intermittently see a problem where when browsing directories containing Nikon Raw files (NEF) from the D300, Bridge displays the wrong preview image for the file I select. For example, if I click on an image icon in one directory, the preview displayed is for a file in a different directory.
I've tried clearing the cache, etc, and nothing seems to change this.
Is this a known bug and/or is there a workaround I can use?
Thanks
-Bill
p.s. this is in addition to the fact that Bridge crashes every few minutes when I run it, so I find myself needing to restart it routinely during each working session.

Check out these 2 posts to see if they help.
http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b516f6/4
http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b51375/1

I redownloaded my Photoshop CS5 and Camera Raw will not accept my RAW files nor will the Adobe Bridge display the picture view of these files. A message displays saying it doesn't support this camera. I have a Nikon 5100 DSLR Camera. It always displayed

I redownloaded my Photoshop CS5 and Camera Raw will not accept my RAW files nor will the Adobe Bridge display the picture view of these files. A message displays saying it doesn't support this camera. I have a Nikon 5100 DSLR Camera. It always displayed them in the past. How can I get it to display these photos in Bridge and open them in RAW?

Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Camera Raw 6.7 Update
Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Camera Raw 6.7 Update
Benjamin

IPod Video 80GB Continues to Display "Don't Disconnect" After Synching

When I synch and iTunes 9.2 says synching is complete, my iPod continues to display "Don't Disconnect." I have reset the iPod several times but each time the problem continues. I have attempted to restore the iPod to factory settings but restore results in an error message and fails. When I disconnect the iPod from the computer and reset, it works normally -- until I reconnect to the computer and the synching problem reappears. iTunes 9.2 seems to have no issues for me apart from this. I have tried using different USB connections to the computer, checking the eject icon in iTunes, re-installing iTunes 9.2 from apple.com rather than software update, and these also make no difference. Is iTunes 9.2 simply incompatible with the video iPod? Suggestions?
Message was edited by: hhorwitz

First and foremost, when you eject the iPod from iTunes, it will usually disappear from your computer and from itunes, but the message on the iPod will continue to display for some time while it continues whatever internal maintenance & cleanup tasks it does.
So one thing that comes to mind is that because this can actually take as long as over a minute or more before the display clears the screen, you may simply not be waiting long enough before you do a reset.
When you are connected to iTunes, the do not disconnect screen should be BLINKING. Once you hit eject, that display should STOP blinking and sit there steady on. Does it do that? If so, this usually indicates it is ejected and doing its internal thing and simply has not got back to clearing the screen and going back to normal play mode.
When the display stops blinking, it is safe to disconnect it. So if you are in a hurry and wanting to head out the door, go ahead and unplug it. But if you are only waiting 10 or 15 seconds for it to clear, try waiting a few minutes and see what happens.
Patrick

IPod Video 80GB Continues to Display "Don't Disconnect" After Synching Done

When I synch and iTunes says synching is complete, my iPod continues to display "Don't Disconnect." I have restored the iPod several times but each time the problem continues. I have attempted to restore the iPod to factory settings but restore results in an error message and fails. When I disconnect the iPod from the computer and restore, it works normally -- until I reconnect to the computer and the synching problem reappears. I am running iTunes 9.2 and it seems to have no issues apart from this. I have tried using different USB connections to the computer and this also makes no difference. Suggestions?

First and foremost, when you eject the iPod from iTunes, it will usually disappear from your computer and from itunes, but the message on the iPod will continue to display for some time while it continues whatever internal maintenance & cleanup tasks it does.
So one thing that comes to mind is that because this can actually take as long as over a minute or more before the display clears the screen, you may simply not be waiting long enough before you do a reset.
When you are connected to iTunes, the do not disconnect screen should be BLINKING. Once you hit eject, that display should STOP blinking and sit there steady on. Does it do that? If so, this usually indicates it is ejected and doing its internal thing and simply has not got back to clearing the screen and going back to normal play mode.
When the display stops blinking, it is safe to disconnect it. So if you are in a hurry and wanting to head out the door, go ahead and unplug it. But if you are only waiting 10 or 15 seconds for it to clear, try waiting a few minutes and see what happens.
Patrick

How to display records that match user input date

hi all,
i need to display records that match user input date (i.e., for example if the difference between user input date and record date is less than 5 years then display those records) , this is for hr bw. any exit is there to check for validation for records to be displayed based on some abap coding.
vijay

I just see getApplication method but "Retrieves a list of all the deployed applications."
My scenario is: I get user, end i want to discorver how application this user i enable to see.

CS4 bridge displays jpegs thumbnails only

CS4 bridge displays jpegs thumbnails only
Can someone who may have seen this problem or experienced a silimilar issue explain what is happening to CS4 bridge. I just installed PC version of CS4 photophop. It appears that in bridge, only jpegs thumnails will display. Tiffs and PSD files only show up as icons. Also the file association menu seems to have disappeared. Now if I log in as administrator , everything works properly. All thumbnails display correctly, assoication menu appears and bridge will update fine. Does anyone have an idea of what is happening here??
Joel F

Did this happen recently, or has it always worked this way? If this is a new occurance some file may be corrupted and your best bet would be to reset Bridge. You can do that by holding down Crtl and starting Bridge. A reset window will appear, choose all 3 options.
One other point. If you are using Vista and an external drive there can be persissoning problems, but this does not seem like it should be one.

Query to display the exact match product at top or increase the nearness

Hello All,
I am using the iStore search and it is returning results for Part Number and Description search. If I am searching a particular Part Number , it is displaying the particular product and its related products. I need the exact matched product in the first row (topmost).
When I checked the back-end query, It is using contains for powerful search.
How can I display the exact match product at top or increase the nearness in search.
Please help.
I have seen a similar thread in the forum.
Contains: exactly match
Thanks in advance,
Muhammed Aslam
Edited by: tpmuhammedaslam on Jan 10, 2013 3:48 AM

Hello Muhammed Aslam,
If fuzzy search is enabled, then cannot search by part number.
The seeded query for iStore product search is based on the description as follows:
Product Search (Section Search - R12)
select * from
(select T.*, RowNum as row_num
from (select inv_item_id INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
,description DESCRIPTION
,0 CATEGORY_ID
,nearness NEARNESS
,concatenated_segments CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS
,primary_uom_code PRIMARY_UOM_CODE
,primary_unit_of_measure PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE
from (SELECT * FROM (select /*+ FIRST_ROWS leading(i) INDEX (x,IBE_SECTION_SEARCH_U1) */
distinct i.inventory_item_id, i.description, 0
,x.inventory_item_id inv_item_id, score(100) nearness
,mtl_system_items_b_kfv.concatenated_segments,
mtl_system_items_b_kfv.primary_uom_code,
mtl_system_items_b_kfv.primary_unit_of_measure
from ibe_ct_imedia_search i,ibe_section_search x
,mtl_system_items_b_kfv
where contains (i.indexed_search, :1 , 100) > 0
and i.language = userenv('LANG')
and i.organization_id = :2
and i.web_status='PUBLISHED'
and x.inventory_item_id = i.inventory_item_id
and i.inventory_item_id = mtl_system_items_b_kfv.inventory_item_id
and i.organization_id = mtl_system_items_b_kfv.organization_id
and x.minisite_id = :4
and x.organization_id =:5
order by nearness desc ) WHERE rownum < :6
))T
where rownum where row_num >= :8
Product Search (Category Search - R12)
select * from
(select T.*, RowNum as row_num
from (select inventory_item_id INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
,description DESCRIPTION
,category_id CATEGORY_ID
,nearness NEARNESS
,concatenated_segments CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS
,primary_uom_code PRIMARY_UOM_CODE
,primary_unit_of_measure PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE
from (select i.inventory_item_id, i.description, i.category_id
,score(100) nearness
,mtl_system_items_b_kfv.concatenated_segments
,mtl_system_items_b_kfv.primary_uom_code
,mtl_system_items_b_kfv.primary_unit_of_measure
from ibe_ct_imedia_search i,
mtl_system_items_b_kfv
where contains (i.indexed_search, :1 , 100) > 0
and i.language = userenv('LANG')
and i.web_status='PUBLISHED'
and i.organization_id = :3
and exists (select 1
from ibe_dsp_section_items s,ibe_dsp_msite_sct_items b
where s.section_item_id = b.section_item_id
and b.mini_site_id = :4
and s.inventory_item_id = i.inventory_item_id
and (s.end_date_active > sysdate or s.end_date_active is null)
and s.start_date_active < sysdate)
and rownum < :5
and i.inventory_item_id = mtl_system_items_b_kfv.inventory_item_id
and i.organization_id = mtl_system_items_b_kfv.organization_id
order by nearness desc ))T
where rownum where row_num >= :7
Regards,
Debbie

Thunderbolt displays don't work with Mac Pro

Hello,
I got today a brand new Mac Pro with 2 thunderbolt displays.
Both displays stay black when I try to connect them on any ot the 4 ports.
Old displays work on the normal port.
Why does new Mac Pro with new 2 thunderbolt displays don't work?
Thanks.

If you can just wait until next year, Time Cook is promising a totally re-vamped Mac Pro which I have to assume will have TB ports.
My only worry is that today (Oct. 23) in the whole new slew of gadgets, Apple will introduce a new TB Display, compete with USB 3.0 ports, ant-glare screens, etc.
Sigh - you live with the technology that you paid for...
Clinton

Display: family specific matching fails

After previous update my MBP shows BSOD always after installing new SU.
The system.log says:
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Jettisoning kernel linker.
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Resetting IOCatalogue.
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: display: family specific matching fails
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 0
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: display: family specific matching fails
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: Previous Shutdown Cause: 3
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: mac 10.3 phy 6.1 radio 10.2
May 26 03:27:57 localhost kernel[0]: IPv6 packet filtering initialized,
default to accept, logging disabled
May 26 03:27:57 localhost memberd[41]: memberd starting up
May 26 03:27:57 localhost mDNSResponder-108.5 (May 9 2007 15: 07:55)[34]:
starting
May 26 03:27:57 localhost lookupd[43]: lookupd (version 369.6) starting - Sat
May 26 03:27:57 2007
May 26 03:27:58 localhost configd[38]:
com.apple.SystemConfiguration.DynamicPowerStep load failed
May 26 03:28:00 localhost kernel[0]: yukonosx: Ethernet address
00:16:cb:8d:e7:8c
Do you know what may caouse this? Its not a big deal since after second restart everything works, but it is kind of annoying.
MBP 2Ghz CoreDuo Mac OS X (10.4.9)

My system.log shows:
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Jettisoning kernel linker.
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Resetting IOCatalogue.
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 2
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 2
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 2
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 2
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 2
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: NVDANV10HAL loaded and registered.
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost kernel[0]: IPv6 packet filtering initialized, default to accept, logging disabled
Jun 4 23:09:24 localhost DirectoryService[51]: Launched version 2.1 (v353.6)
Jun 4 23:09:25 localhost kernel[0]: UniNEnet: Ethernet address 00:30:65:ab:a5:50
Jun 4 23:09:26 localhost kernel[0]: NVDA,Display-B: vram [98000000:08000000]
Jun 4 23:09:29 localhost configd[43]: AppleTalk startup
Jun 4 23:09:29 localhost configd[43]: setting hostname to "localhost.local"
Jun 4 23:09:30 localhost mDNSResponder: Adding browse domain local.
Jun 4 23:09:32 localhost lookupd[138]: lookupd (version 369.5) starting - Mon Jun 4 23:09:32 2007
Jun 4 23:09:34 localhost configd[43]: target=enable-network: disabled
Jun 4 23:09:35 localhost configd[43]: AppleTalk startup complete
Which might be a problem with your video card or display. Since it's a MBP, I'd contact AppleCare or take it into an Apple Store. Good luck

Songs and album covers don't match up?

On my 4s, when I enabled Icloud and downloaded my music library something got out of sync. Now, most songs don't match up to the album cover etc. displayed on my screen. I have tried deleting and downloading again and the problem remains. Any suggestions?

Album cover images depend on whether you downloaded the album/song off the pre-installed iTunes store on the iPod or you downloaded an mp3 from your computer into iTunes then synced it to the device, the only solution in this case without consulting apple help directly would be to try purchasing a song or album from the on-device iTunes store and seeing if you get a cover image then, otherwise I'd seek help from apple themselves as it may be a software issue and you could possibly get your device looked at or replaced under your 1 year warrantee. That is if your still covered.
hope this helps, olly.

From and/or subject don't match msg body

Hello all. Two weeks ago I posted this problem under a different head, but got no replies, so let me try again as it is messing up maybe 5% of my email.
Every morning I collect email--from 40 to 70 messages, many forwarded from Gmail--and message filtering usually works efficiently to transfer from Inbox to folders. But somewhere along the line, 1 to 3 emails get muddled together: the from and/or subject don't match the text, and sometimes the displayed text includes the Msg Source, including text, from some other, unrelated email.
I've been using FF and TB for more than 10 years now, and believe this kind of email muddling dates only to the last couple months. I use the latest Thunderbird under Windows 7 on a Dell desktop. I have 4 hopefully innocent addons. Of course I can send screenshots and forward the message source for analysis.
Hoping this time to attract attention to the problem! Thanks!

This is an indication of file corruption. Lack of maintenance on your email folders is the usual cause of this.
You can try to repair the file tables and see if that helps. Be prepared to lose messages if the corruption is too bad.
Right click the problem folder. Select Properties and then Repair Folder.
Then read this article about best practices to help prevent this in the future.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Keep_it_working_-_Thunderbird

Error: JAR & JAD don't match during installation in Nokia 7650

hi all'
i have developed an application with midp 1.0 /cldc. its working fine in nokia & motorola simulator. but while installing in Nokia 7650 real device it shows the following error:
***** Jad & Jar don't Match.
i have created the jar & jad with sun j2me wtk 1.0
thanx

hi,
sorry! this is not the answer to your problem but a request for your help instead. Actually I
read ur msg n found that u're a bit expert in this technology so plzz help me out in displaying/downloading the MIDlet appln which i've developed using RMI and servlets on a WAP/GPRS/JAVA enabled cell phone(Samsung-C100).
actually i know that the .jad file can be downloaded on the cell phone directly but how that happens i don't know, plzz help me.
Thanks
Animesh

Bridge display vs. PS display: don't match

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for