Buy to Sell - VL06G (IS-OIL)

Goodmorning all,
We can to carry out simultenous good issue/good receipt in buy to sell process only with VL02N transaction, but not with massive goods issue VL06G.
Do you have some info about this anomaly!?
Thanks in advance.
Salvio

Sorry the information provided is not enough to understand what exactly your issue is.  You mean to say that you were unable to process via VL06G ??   Have you tried with VL10C from where also, you can process in mass ??
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

  • Contract of intent buy or sell? Contractor as a supplier or customer?

    Hi
    I am newbie to Projects.
    We are implemeting oracle apps for One of Govenrment Client, Government of Gujarat(GOG).
    Now GOG, Creates a Project P1 with two tasks Task1(Road Construction 5km) and Task2(Road Construction another 5km). This tasks are to be outsourced to two different contractors
    Question
    should we define contractor as a customer or supplier
    should we create contract of type buy or sell.
    Please respond asap as same affects our Go live Milestone.
    Regards
    Vimal K

    Hi
    I'm not sure I could understand the business requirement.
    Let's assume GOG has contracted contractor AAA for 100,000 USD.
    Over time, that contractor will raise invoices, and GOG, the customer, should pay the supplier invoices.
    You are saying that GOG require deposit from the contractor, at the begining of the project. I assume this is a method of guaranty. My understanding is that customer will want to keep that deposit and reduce the amount he is paying to supplier, until the project is finished. Only then the customer will release the deposit and pay it back to the supplier.
    The method of reducing payments on invoices and delaying it to future date is usually known as retention. However, Oracle does not support retention functionality for suppliers.
    Dina

  • Buy to Sell process

    Can anyone give me some information about Buy to sell process? It mean simultaneous good issue/good receipt.
    Thank's
    Giancarlo

    First, turn off your caps lock. It is considered shouting and rude, and many will not even
    look at your post.
    Before you buy a used iPhone, you need to have the previous owner do these things:
    Before Selling/Giving Away an iOS Device
    Backup the device to iTunes or iCloud, if desired: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1766
    Settings > Messages > iMessage > Off
    Settings > FaceTime > Off
    Settings > iCloud > Delete Account (this only unregisters and deletes it off the iPhone)
    Settings > General > Reset > Erase All Content and Settings
    More Info... http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5661
    (thanks to paulcb for the wording)
    If you have purchased a used iPhone and the previous owner did not do those things, you must contact
    him to get those items done.
    If the previous owner does not prepare the iPhone correctly before you buy it, Activation Lock will
    prevent restoring or activating the iPhone without the AppleID and passcode used to originally activate it.
    There is no workaround for Activation Lock. Apple will not help you circumvent this security feature. There
    is no support to give other than to be sure the iPhones you purchase used are prepared properly as above
    before you pay for them.
    iCloud: Find My iPhone Activation Lock in iOS 7
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5818?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4515

  • I want to get certified to work on macs and buy and sell and repair them.what should i do

    i want to get certified to buy sell and repair macs what kind of certifiacation should i get anybody help    

    That is the stuff that USED to be hung off the developer site. It includes this program:
    http://training.apple.com/certification/acmt
    Apple Certified Macintosh Technician Certification
    Apple Certified Macintosh Technician (ACMT) certification verifies the ability to perform basic troubleshooting and repair of both desktop and portable Macintosh systems, such as iMac and MacBook Pro. ACMT certification exams emphasize identifying and resolving common Mac OS X problems, and using Apple Service and Support products and practices to effectively repair Apple hardware.
    Who Should Seek ACMT Certification?
    ACMT certification is intended for technicians employed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider (AASP) or Self Servicing Account (SSA), or for persons motivated to demonstrate their knowledge of technician-level service and support skills. For persons not employed by an AASP or SSA, attaining ACMT certification verifies skills and knowledge that may be sought by a prospective employer, such as an Apple Reseller or a self-servicing entity like a school system.
    Please note that ACMT certification by itself does not authorize a technician to perform repairs on Apple products. Information on becoming authorized for servicing Apple products can be found at:apple.com/support/programs/

  • Have you ever been ripped off buy a seller and not get your money back?

    Have you been ripped off by an ebay seller?

    I have been ripped off on an wedding gown. Never got any response from customer service. The seller wanted the gown back but it would have cost more money then what I spent. The dress was a joke..a piece of material with tulle attached. I still havent been reimbursed

  • I buy and sell computers and i have a new iMac pro and i cannot authorize it because it says i already have 5 and i probably do because i have not reauthorized them? is there anything i can do

    can u have more than 5 comp authorized

    De-authorizing Computers (contributed by user John Galt)
    You can de-authorize individual computers, but only by using those computers. The only other option is to "de-authorize all" from your iTunes account.
      1. Open iTunes on a computer
      2. From the Store menu, select "View my Account..."
      3. Sign in with your Apple ID and password.
      4. Under "Computer Authorizations" select "De-authorize All".
      5. Authorize each computer you still have, as you may require.
    You may only do this once per year.
    After you "de-authorize all" your authorized computers, re-authorize each one as required.
    If you have de-authorized all computers and need to do it again, but your year has not elapsed, then contact: Apple - Support - iTunes - Contact Us.
    For more information on authorization and de-authorization: iTunes Store- Authorize or deauthorize your Mac or PC.

  • I'm a pc tech, I go through computers like water buying and selling. Apple says I can only "deauthorize all computers" once a year. Over time, I've authorized the 5 that Apple allows, now I can't even authorize the one I'm currently using. WTH DO I DO????

    I've had constant problems with syncing, I don't understand why Apple can't just make a simple interface where I can sync what's on my iPhone to a new computer, thereby creating a "library" of what I have on my phone already.  Obviously, what I have on my phone is what the heck I want on my phone.  I'm a pc tech, I go through several computers a year because I buy and sell and repair them.  Apple won't let me "deauthorize" computers until NOVEMBER, and it won't let me "Authorize" the desktop I just built for myself.  The new iPhone OS is about to debut, and I can't even sync this phone to my new computer or new itunes.  THis is ridiculously complicated and frustrating as ****.  If I didn't like the iPhone so much, I'd never bother with all this hassle.  And Apple wonders why suddenly about 70% of the market now belongs to ANDROID users. What do I have to do, Call customer support to get my account straight???? TOTALLY disgusted with this whole thing.

    dustyrhodesnola wrote:
    I've had constant problems with syncing, I don't understand why Apple can't just make a simple interface where I can sync what's on my iPhone to a new computer, thereby creating a "library" of what I have on my phone already. 
    iPhones are not, nor have they every been storage devices.  They are merely mirrors of the content in the users iTunes library.  As such, syncing is one way, computer to iDevice.
    dustyrhodesnola wrote:
    II'm a pc tech, I go through several computers a year because I buy and sell and repair them.  Apple won't let me "deauthorize" computers until NOVEMBER, and it won't let me "Authorize" the desktop I just built for myself. 
    Learn to deauthorize them before taking them out of service.  Sorry, but the scenario describe above is not "normal" and I cannot imagine any user buying a used computer from a so-called tech that he built for himself.  If building computers for customers, build them for the customer and keep your data off of them.
    dustyrhodesnola wrote:
    The new iPhone OS is about to debut, and I can't even sync this phone to my new computer or new itunes. 
    Again, had the previous computers been de-authorized this would be a none issue.  A call to iTunes Customer Support may provide a way around the one year limit on deauthorizing all computers.
    dustyrhodesnola wrote:
    THis is ridiculously complicated and frustrating
    No, it's not.
    dustyrhodesnola wrote:
    If I didn't like the iPhone so much, I'd never bother with all this hassle. 
    In that case, READ the User's Guide and educate yourself on how to use the device as designed.  Or find a competent tech to explain it in a way that you can understand it.

  • Pets Game - No Buy "PADLOCK"

    many pets players are happy with their owners and/or situation and banner up as "no buy" pets to avoid being taken out of these situations... the reasons are various but usually because good friends wish to stay together... there is currently no method a player can have limited and mutual agreed protection against other players who wish to split up these arrangements.. in the etiquette of the game buying a "no buy" pet is considered harassment A solution would be to put a "NO BUY PETS PADLOCK" on our pet pages to prevent these potential harassments / bullying... put a padlock icon.... open and closed... when a pet AND it's owner BOTH mutally agree and click on the lock icon then the pet becomes "unavailable" to sell and it's buy button is dimmed.... something along these lines would make a real difference in player satisfaction with the game... all other issues and contraversies aside... it would give players some limited control over their ownership and prevent pets game harassment... not only is it an easy thing to do... it is the RIGHT thing to do.. how hard is it to get tagged to pay any attention to our repeated request for this feature.. why is that? each pet would have a lil padlock icon.. or something similar... on it's page next to the pic somewhere... it has two positions... open and closed.... when it is open... that means that pet is AVAILABLE for sale.... period.... when it is closed... that means BOTH the owner and the pet have clicked on the icon to indicate the pet is LOCKED / UNAVAILABLE...  it takes a MUTUAL agreement between both pet and owner to activate the NO BUY padlock... once activated... EITHER ONE of the owner - pet pair can UNLOCK the pet by clicking the icon again... two in agreement can lock it and it takes BOTH OWNER AND PET TO DO THAT... to deactivate the palock... it only takes ONE... EITHER the owner or the pet to unlock it....  the programming construct is far simpler than most any other feature on the pet page... it's a simple logical field insertion...
    OWNER CLICKS THE PET PADLOCK *AND* THE OWNED PET CLICKS PADLOCK = TRUE = PET UNAVAILABLE...  EITHER ONE OF THE OWNER *OR* PET DOES NOT / UNCHECKS PADLOCK = FALSE = PET AVAILABLE  easiest thing in the world to do... easier than instant grits... we are talking minor minor stuff that a decent coder could knock out in a couple hours here ppl.... it would make a HUGE diff in the game...  1) no more puttin "no buy" in banners... so there is more room for other stuff 2) ppl can tell right away whether it's a for real "no buy" situation or something else 3) no more rewarding no buy snatchers to harass other pet players4) allows responsible player control over alternates 5) keeps profiles "married up" in a worry free environment 6) PREVENTS PETS GAME CYBER BULLYING 7) keeps newbs and stoopid people from making the worst play in the game 8) adds to the fame and fortune of boxing kitty as a problem solver  ok.. forget 1-7... just do it for number 8 UPDATE 4/17 = i'm going to keep adding more thoughts to this thread as time passes... during the the time this thread has "under consideration" status... more thoughts for tagged and all to consider.... One of the best ways for Tagged to increase its revenues is to sell gold to it's users... gold that can be converted to pet cash... and help a player clean up mistakes or increase value and standing in the game... whether you are a pets game purist and think it a short cut or not... (same is true with other games where gold can be converted).... it is tagged's right as a business to conduct business as they see fit... and selling cyber gold is a money maker... it's just the way it is... So one might think Tagged would be interested in allowing users a way to increase the security of the profiles in which they could invest.... a player would almost CERTAINLY feel more CONFIDENT about purchasing gold and converting it to pet cash IF they had some way to know that his/her profile were protected by a NO BUY PADLOCK... as normally the case when a pet is bought in violation of no buy.. there results a lot of anger... frustration... and in most cases... a profile is abandonned or "DUMPED" in retaliation to the NO BUY VIOLATION... I for one have ZERO interest in buying gold to build a profile knowing i have ZERO chance to protect and preserve when i have it placed with a friend or a good owner... i am sure there are others who would INVEST MORE WITH GOLD AND DO SO WITH CONFIDENCE were we given something as simple as this modest level of protection... So not only is the NO BUY PETS PADLOCK a simple and easy mechanism to put in place... it would also end a lot of drama and needless hassles... close the window of opportunity for online harassment (we can block a user with privacy settings but not from buying our profiles in pets game... leaving that vulnerability open is like putting a screen door on a submarine)... AND it would be good for Tagged's profitablity by encouraging people to invest MORE in their profiles....(tagged can do this by BUILDING SECURITY AND VALUE into the profiles obviously) From any and all perspectives... the NO BUY PETS PADLOCK is a win for everyone Update 4-25-12 well it has happened to your old pal BK.... after being split up from my GF and pets game partner 8 times in the last 5 months... i've decided the ongoing hassle just isn't worth it and will be withdrawing my primary profile from the pets game... after playing pets daily going on 3 years... it will seem odd.... and sure i'm just a little player in the grand scheme of things.... maybe one has to be 100 times my value to gain anyone's attention to the NO BUY PADLOCK idea... i've no delusions there... and yet i wonder... how many other members of tugged have withdrawn / opted out / abandonned profiles due to a hostile take over?...  in my case there is no doubt.. the person behind the chain pets and splitting up our married profiles has a long sad history on tagged for harassment, issuing threats and using pets game to intimidate... it's a shame that a friendly game can be abused by a few for such purposes.. this fellow has been deleted by tagged in the past and somehow always manages to get re-instated.... go figure if i were a tagged admin or a programmer and responsible for creating a fun and friendly environment for this SOCIAL networking game...  it would be a high priority to build in simple safe guards that prevent online cyber bullying.... if i were a suit in tagged's management structure... i would look to find ways to increase profitability and drive a design the ENCOURAGES investment in member profiles... more visits, more ad hits, more gold sales, etc... the NO BUY PETS PADLOCK just makes good business sense from all perspectives.. you'd think business savvy execs would see this simple solution incorporated ASAP...   if nothing else... the NO BUY PETS PADLOCK could also limit tagged's exposure to liability from being named co-defendant in any type of civil suit over cyber-bullying as a result of negligence... negligent means being aware that you've created a condition or environment that is conducive to unlawful or harmful activity, being aware that such coniditions exist and then failing to effect a rememdy... just FYI... new laws around this issue are being written every day... and if i were a big wheel at tagged... i'd be paying better attention and taking prompt action to limit this exposure to potential litigation.... especially since Pets Game is tagged's number one product Update 6-3-2012 i've read over some of the comments posted... and i do appreciate what ppl are saying even though they may not agree.... so i'll respectfully respond to a couple of them ... i think the two biggest objections to the padlock idea are as follows.... 1) one player wrote..."the object of the game is to buy and sell pets.. a padlock would be an impediment to that...."
    response = if you as a pet or an owner do not wish to be or own "No Buy" pets... then the padlock would not change how you wish to play... it is an OPTION available to players that would require BOTH the owner and the pet's consent before the padlock is set... therefore if you do not wish to keep a pet then you simply do not set the padlock... same if you are an owned pet... other players can buy and sell as usual.... the padlock would only be activated by mutual consent... after those that wish do so activate the padlock... there still would be no shortage of good pets to buy and sell... simply having the option wouldn't change anyone's game except for people who buy "no buy" pets as a habit 2) another pets player wrote .. " I make it a point to buy "no buy" pets because i know they will be bought back and i make a quick profit".... response = i cannot caution new players enough against adopting this strategy... it may work sometimes but the odds are against you... many more times than not you will be stuck with an abandonned pet that will drain its cash and migrate to a different profile.. it's a good way to throw away your pet cash... true... there are no "official" rulles against buying a "no buy" pet and there is no mechanism in the game to prevent that..... however it is consdiered in the etiquette of the game to be a "hostile" action which violates the wishes of the pet and it's owner... it's a matter of respect... when a player snatches a "no buy" pet.. there is no obligation for the person to play or maintain that profile any longer... for this reason it is not the wisest of strategies to employ... the end result is usually making people mad / causing drama...  snatching of no buy pets usually forces someone to abandon a profile that they have enjoyed and developed over time (years in some cases)... and it is a HUGE hassle for the NO BUY pet to move friends, other content, etc... not to mention that the profile loses wishers and position in other games they may be playing... snatching a "no buy" pet is the most disruptive play one can make in the game... it is received badly 99.9 percent of the time and will not make one many friends in the game that way... some commenters have said "i buy "nobuy" pets on purpose"... but in fairness what these commenters are NOT saying is they know it's an extremely risky manuever with really no genuine desire to OWN the pet they are buying... rather they are looking for quck profit from a buy back.... this is why our "nobuy" pets wind up in dumps and on pets with insulting pics and banners, etc..... the violators of "no buy" do so usually because they know it's a big risk, utterly disruptive and rarely keep the "no buy" pet onto their primary pet page..... worse yet and often... the buyer of a no buy pet begins a campaign of bullying and treats against the pet if it does not play, if the original owner does not buy back or otherwise get sold.....  if this is not how harrassment in pets game is conducted then i don't know what is...
     one thing that i'm hoping TAGGED and pets players will understand is that our pet is just part of the larger profile... we have worked not only to build our pet page but our status/ranking in other games as well... we have customized our profiles and put work into building friends lists and other content.... in other words... our profiles are VALUABLE to us and tagged should help us protect that which we value... when a player snatches a no buy pet.. sometimes years of work and development go down the drain in an instant... just two clicks by someone else can make a valuable profile worthless to it's owner... tagged should give us some way to prevent that kind of damage Update 6-11-12 i'm reading the comments and i appreciate the support.. if nothing else i hope this thread will educate others about the whole "NO BUY" concept.... there are lots of good reasons why a player would not want to have others take the pets from their page... sometimes it's a pet that is won in a key race... sometimes it's a "stacker"... sometimes and prolly most the time its a friend.... but if this thread can at least save botht the owners and buyers of "NO BUY" pets from some unnecessary drama... then i'll take what victory i can from keeping this convo going... and i'm not blasting or flaming any one for being honest and expressing their opinion... that is what makes the discussion more valuable and meaningful.... so please bear that in mind when you read thru comments...  one other theme that runs thru the dissenting opinion...ppl are saying "ok.. if you don't want to be bought then instead of "no buy" .... you should just "opt out"... i can see where ppl think that all is fair game... and perhaps without official "rules" and a padlock mechanism... for the time being... opting out would be one way to tell other players "do not buy me"... right?... i get it.... however...i think the idea here is to ENCOURAGE ppl to play pets in a way that is fun and enjoyable... is it not better to bring people INTO the game rather than driving them OUT of the game?... buying a no buy pet tends to have the later effect...it causes people to leave the game or at least to abandon the jacked profile / pet... that's not what any of us want i don't think.. including tagged... on the other hand... i should mention in all of this... that if one takes the time to talk to ppl you see on the playground... make friends and enjoy a social networking game together... that IF YOU ASK b4 you buy... some NO BUY pets will be the best pets you'll own... most long time players would agree they just want some small degree of control... it's a good fit when the player and owner have a mutual desire to be in the arrangement... and yes... ppl do have to be raised which requires ppl to trade and flip pets...  so here's a tip from your ole pal BK... make friends and ask first.... you'll find most pets players are a good lot for the most part... but about the fastest way i know to get on ppl's bad sides is to snatch their "no buy" pets without some previous arrangement...   it's a social networking game most of all... play nice... be good company... that's the best advice i can give ya... UPDATE 6-13-12 was talking to a friend who does not play pets... she had opted out as many have suggested a player do... and yet even though she had opted out of pets game... as soon as she comes online then pets players buy her and flip her anyway... she has told me she has no interest in playing pets game ... finds it "distasteful" that ppl put values on others... and does not appreciate the hostility she's encountered from ppl that expect to her play pets game since they have bought her...... in other words.... opting out does not always work.... and ok... i explain to her that it is just a game... like trading baseball cards at one level and not take things personally... but here's an interesting angle on why we need the NO BUY PETS PADLOCK... i'm sure there are other members of tagged / hi5 who have no interest and would rather NOT be involved at all...  another friend and posters here have commented about winning k pets and owning non-playing profiles which are bannered "no buy" and are set free from their owners once they have built enough pet cash to do so... these profiles are obviously ownerless... bannered no buy... there is no intent to maintain or play them as a normal profile... and yet other players still buy them and expect a response and the pet to be maintained so it will sell... therefore another option with the NO BUY PADLOCK would be if a pet is OWNERLESS for whatever reason.. either a set free has occured... an owner quits the game and ghosts... whatever... if a pet is ownerless then it could set the Padlock to lock it in as a "no buy"... any attempt to buy the pet/profile at that point would return a "Pet is unavailable for sale" condition...
     this would make sure that members with no desire to play pets and that repsonsible players have a way to set a profile so that it cannot be "pulled" back into the game again... if you really consider all the reasons for the PADLOCK... i'm hoping everyone will see how useful this feature could be and benefit everyone UPDATE 6-14-2012 just had a lil thought to throw in here.... i see pet players all the time saying "i show up everyday... i play well and buy pets.. i have good numbers in value, cash and assets.... and still.. no one will buy and raise me".... right?... i wonder how many players like that would be helped if more established players were not required to re-invest all the profit in buiding their own profiles because as it is now... the only defense against being snatched by a "NO BUY" pet buyer is to raise your value to such an amount that it's prohibitive... and in some cases... even not then...  the padlock would be one thing that allows ppl to concentrate on helping others up in the game rather than always having to play on the defense.... does that make sense?... FURTHER UPDATES AND EXPLORATION OF OP CAN BE FOUND IN THREAD COMMENTS due to size limitations in the TOPIC / OP ...Please read on and add your KUDO if you agree... thanks

    I agree with this idea 100%  Taggeds answer will be that buying pets is the purpose of the game, and no buy was created by the players not them. What they fail to take into consideration is that sexual harassment, threats, bullying is what has made many of us be no buys.  The current game is more runs than it is pet buying, the ONLY reason to buy no buys is pure greed and harassment, and that wasn't the intent of the game either.  JUST like they had to adjust and incorporate the key runs as part of the game, they need to listen to the players who choose to be no buy, and many spend large $s on their profiles, and give us a way to stay where we choose.  There are surely enough pets who are not no buy, to keep the game going.  The lock would drastically cut down on the fighting and amount of complaints that they get, there is no down side to giving us a pad lock. 

  • If I buy an ipod through Kijiji, can the ownership be transfered so i can get technical support if needed?

    If I buy an ipod through Kijiji, can the ownership be transfered so i can get technical support if needed? Kijiji is an ottawa based website which allows people to buy and sell lightly used or new products for a cheaper price then in stores!

    If you buy from an Apple Authorized Reseller, yes, Apple will honor their warranty. You can find authorized resellers at http://www.apple.com/buy/

  • Where is the best place to buy an ipod nano

    I been waiting to buy an ipod nano for a long time but I cant figure out where I want to buy it. I dont know where there is a place that sells it in stock. So if you have any suggestions post them please.

    Target, Circuit City and Best Buy all sell nano's.... I think Radio Shack does too..

  • How much should I expect to sell Mac Pro 1,1 for?

    I am looking to upgrade my computer and would like to sell my Mac Pro. I am going to first try Craigslist, then EBay. What should I ask for it? What Should I expect to recieve if I am lucky? Expect to recieve in reality?
    Mac Pro 1,1
    2x 2.66ghz Dual Core Xeon (4 cores)
    6GB Memory
    ATI Radeon X1900XT
    4x 7200 RPM HDD - 250gb Seagate (factory drive), 500gb Seagate (ST3500320AS), 500gb WD Caviar Black, 1TB WD Caviar Black (2.25TB)
    All original documentation, packaging, discs. Bluetooth keyboard and Magic Mouse. Clean, nearly dust free interior. A few very small blemishes on the outside.
    Has a fresh install of OSX 10.6.8. Also would come with FCP7 and Adobe CS6 preloaded. Ran AHT and everything is good.
    Mac2Sell says 1110 is what I should expect. Does this seem accurate?

    eBay has a built-in "Reality Check":
    Search for exactly what you are looking to buy or sell. keep refining with keywords until you are getting the things you want, plus less than about 10 percent wierd stuff.
    Then check the checkbox in the sidebar that says" Completed Items". These are the sales and non-sales for about the last month. Sort by price.
    The lowest priced items usually fell off a forklift or are "for parts, not working". Eventually, you get into real, working systems that are ugly, then ones that are okay. Make sure there were several bids.
    If your auction goes badly, that may be what you get. If you make your item more attractive and appealing, then maybe you get more. On Craigs list, maybe you can do better by throwing in local delivery or something.

  • I can not BUY Mountain Lion - Licensing File???

    I try to buy OS X Mountain Lion already since a few hours (more than 16 to be exact) but it always comes up with an error message.
    When pressing "buy" botton:
    "Your purchase can not be finalized. The product distribution file couldn´t be validated. It is possible that it is damaged or not signed correctly."
    So, why do I have to worry about distribution of Mountain Lion? I am the customer and want to buy, not sell!
    Apple isn´t responding on my question so far ...
    How can I get / buy ML finally?
    I´m on the german appstore and so the message was freely translater (as close to the meaning).
    Or is Apple having problems with the file for other countries?
    Any help appreciated.
    Tried already starting mac up, logging out and into account deleting cache ...

    If you have anti virus software installed, disable that before downloading apps.
    Turn off the Firewall in System Preferences > Security (or Security & Privacy) > Firewall
    If that doesn't help, open the Finder. From the Finder menu bar click Go > Go to Folder
    Type this exactly as you see it here:
    ~/Library/Preferences
    Click Go
    Move these files from the Preferences folder to the Trash.
    com.apple.appstore.plist
    com.apple.storeagent.pllist
    Now here:
    ~/Library/Cookies
    Click Go
    Move the com.apple.appstore.plist file from the Cookies folder to the Trash.
    Empty the Trash, try the App Store.
    If nothing above has helped, installing the  OS X Lion Update 10.7.4 (Client Combo) reinstalls the App Store for.
    It's ok to do this even though you are already running v10.7.4. Restart your Mac after the combo is installed then launch the App Store.
    If that didn't help either, quit the App Store if it's open.
    Open the Finder. From the Finder menu bar top of your screen click Go > Go to Folder
    Type this exactly as you see it here:
    /Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration
    Click Go
    Move the NetworkInterfaces.plist file from the SystemConfiguration folder to the Trash.
    Relaunch the App Store and try downloading MLion.
    edited by: cs

  • Insignia + Best Buy = Frustrating

    So... I'm deciding it's time to upgrade from my 3-year-old Phillips 42in 1080i plasma I bought at C-ircuit C-ity three years ago. TV has been a true champ! After lots of looking around and comparison shopping, Best Buy has looked like the ideal place due to prices, selection, etc.
    I decide on the Insignia 46in 120MHz LCD. I figure it's a simple checkout, but take the offer up on 0% financing and go through the process. This is where the frustration begins... this TV was an open-box return, so needed to be run through a special open-box system that doesn't work right. After 1.5 hours of creating new open box tags, running through computers, trying to get things working to no success, I end up having to leave and am told it'll be held for me. I'm late for a meeting at work (was over my lunch break), and I walked out with no TV.
    I return the next day after work. No one can find my TV that was being held. Eventually it turns up after about 45 minutes of running through different people. I try and purchase it, but someone messed up my credit app and had incorrect info. I wait in line at customer service and have to go through more time having it all corrected and billed.
    Finally, I get to bring my new TV home. I open it up, but the remote that was with it is no longer there. There was no note that is was missing, and I was told at the time there was a remote with it. My Comcast remotes don't have a code for it, so I'm kinda stuck at the moment, and probably have to go purchase a remote and hope it has comparable functionality. I get it set up, and am expecting all of the rave quality of set that I was sold on ("this house brand is all LG parts! it's amazing, that's why we stand by it at Best Buy! Stay away from Vizio, that's a frankenstein, yada yada yada" rambles sales people I've talked to at BB).
    The set itself isn't the most wonderful. Grainy picture even with 1080p PS3 inputs, insane ghosting on 1080i input, etc and different than I was led to understand at the store. But here's the worst part: it shuts itself off randomly. After doing research online, this is a common defect with many models of Insignia LCDs. I can't believe that Best Buy can sell something that has such a potential issue to erupt at any time. I'm glad that mine started only within two days of purchase. How honest is it to sell lines of TVs with known defects and not at least warn customers or acknowledge the issue?
    I call support, now I have to take additional time out of my day to either have techs come out and replace parts in the TV that have the same potential issue since it's a design flaw, or haul my TV back with the risk that if anything seems to happen to it in transit, I lose my warrantee. Not only that, I have to go back and invest more time and frustration with Best Buy staff who can't seem to get anything right, and after all this will offer only a refund, another of the same defective TV, or have me pay them more money to get another brand, which had they told me I'd have these issues in the first place, I would have.
    Thank you, Insignia and Best Buy! Good thing I didn't go to W-al-mart, then I wouldn't have had to deal with any sales people, dishonest sales pitches, or defective house brands, and have all this extra time in my life to enjoy said TV...

    Well, combining the following factors leads me to believe a high probability. It's always subjective and anything's possible, but if any of the things are true below, then I think BB has some responsibility to own up to for the TV itself:
    1. BB is supposed to gather information about returns (sales person said it was a customer return). There's a high chance that the buyer had the same issue I think.
    2. BB should have tested for issues. Since this is a common/known defect in Insignia TVs (though not formally acknowledged by either company...), this should have been evaluated before selling to another customer. Truthfully, there should be a recall and a formal solution for this issue since it's a common defect in the design and not just a quality-control issue (ala a cracked screen, bad solder connection).
    And really, the reason I went with TV is because I was told this was the most amazing TV on earth, was a rebranded LG with the same level of quality, and a nice TV through-and-through with no real differences to the others outside of specs. I'm okay with someone selling me something, as long as it's honest. in the retail industry, a company is responsible for it's representations, services, and products, not me.
    Bottom line, had I just went in, picked it myself, quick five-minute credit-app and point-of-sale, and found out I made a bad choice, then shame on me. BB gets involved, gives me a lousy consumer experience, misrepresents a product, and sends me home with a defective TV not up to the representation they gave, then shame on them. And I understand not everyone will see it my way from a personal opinion and standpoint, but I believe I have some valid points.

  • Best place to buy a docking station?

    I have a T42 and am looking for a docking station... Any in particular you recommend and where I can purchase one? Thanks.

    1. The ThinkPads.com Open Forum has a Marketplace sub-forum where registered members can buy and sell ThinkPad-related merchandise.
    2. eBay, craigslist, kijiji, etc. all have listings for used ThinkPad parts. Make sure you know the exact FRU of the dock you need for your T42 and beware of the possibility of scammers.
    3. IT eXchange in Oakville specializes in selling used ThinkPad parts.
    Cheers... Dorian Hausman
    X1C2, TPT2, T430s, SL500, X61s, T60p, A21p, 770, 760ED... 5160, 5150... S360/30

  • How do I sell my old PowerBook G4?

    Does anybody know of a reputable company - either online or in New York? My PowerBookG4 (40 GB, 867 MHz, 768 MB RAM, battery not working) is pretty worthless to be, but I would like to see if I can sell it for something... a $100, perhaps?
    help!
    thanks
    Necator

    Online, you have Craigslist or Ebay, which is an auction site. Ebay you need to have an account to buy or sell. It's not difficult to set one up. Craigslist is very popular and I don't think you need to set an account up.
    Ebay reaches a very wide audience and if you word your ad right and accompany it with detailed photos you have a good chance of selling it. You also get to choose to auction it or set a buy it now price. Auctioning is the most popular. How high the price goes depends on how many people see your ad.
    www.ebay.com
    http://www.craigslist.org
    hope this helps.... Is it the 12" G4 by any chance. They still fetch a good price.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Question: Why does iTunes demand that I restore my 3G each time I connect?

    I have the iPhone 3G, and every time I plug it into iTunes 7.7.1, it makes me restore..every **** time! How can one avoid this??

  • X2100 hardware RAID support

    Got a new X2100 server with two SATA disks. I upgraded the BIOS using the Supplemental 1.1 disk. The BIOS revision reported is now 1.0.3. Have defined a hardware RAID mirror of two SATA disks using the BIOS utility. Looks Ok and is reported as "Healt

  • Org unit relations not created

    Hi Experts, We are facing one issue. When there is large change in HR data then 3-4 IDOC came into SRM system. Generaly first IDOC carry new org unit information abd second IDOC carry relation of Org unit with higher org unit. As IDOC processes simul

  • Attachments Moving after Moving Email from Exchange Mailbox to PST

    A user with Office 2013 has an Exchange 2013 mailbox and moves some emails to an attached PST file. Attached documents in an email, such as a PDF,gets placed behind the senders email signature making the attachment impossible to open without clicking

  • Removing an attached style sheet

    I accidentally attached the wrong CSS to one of my Index files. I looked around and couldn't find a command to unlink or unattach the CSS so I just deleted the code from the Index file. It was a single line of code, and it worked, but is that the cor