Calculation of overtime amount

Hello everybody,
                 I have done overtime by giving  number of hours in the 2010 infotype and assigned the /001 valuation bases to it bcoz it gives the wage per hour.. but the valuation bases is calculating on the whole of gross amount where as i want it calculate on only the basic salary how can i do tht.... waiting for the answers....
  Regards
   K.Manoj

Hai..
SM30, V_512W_D.. Give ur country..
Then select ur basic pay wage type.. double click on it.. check processing class 1. Maintain specification 1.. for ur basic pay wage type only.. for rest of the wage types which u copied.. maintain processing class 1 specification 0..   Dont change Processing classes of standard entries..
manu

Similar Messages

  • Calculation of partial amount

    My problem is How the total amount of the invoice can be found and partial amout...and how to calucalte it
    it is stated that enter will be there in BSEG-REBSG..but hwen i goto that table the DMBTR value is filled...
    can anyone explain below part...
    FI documents would be internally numbered. So, program to generate .txt file should provide for preventing invoices from being captured for more than the payable amount. For example, if amount credited to vendor is Euro 10,000 vide FI (and invoice verification in MM) document number 330000567. If partial amount of Euro 2000 has already been paid against this invoice, system should prevent user from entering this invoice with amount of more than Euro 8000 that is still payable.
    Program should look for (field / table) REBZG / BSEG (Number of the Invoice the Transaction Belongs to) in vendor line items (posting key 31 & 25, 50). System populates this field with invoice number against which partial amount is paid or other adjustment (debit memo amount, for example) happens. Please remember that system does not update this field when entire invoice amount is settled in the last out going payment/other adjustment document.
    Program should calculate balance amount to be paid based on:
    1. Vendor credited & expense debited vide (posting key 31,32,34 -39) for given invoice number (Document type K0,K1,KI, Number range 34,11,12)    MINUS
    2. Partial payment/ other adjustments, as per REBZG / BSEG referred above, made against the invoice number entered.
    Program should prevent entry for an amount that is more than the balance amount to be received (calculated as per points 1 and 2 above).
    It follows that if the balance calculated is full amount of the invoice (i.e. partial payments have not been received or other adjustments not done), then program should allow entry for the full invoice amount. (This will be relevant in case of MRP invoices).
    After once it validates..it will send a txt file ..with entries given...

    dear i dont know much about FI but in this case of partial payment u have to search for the document in BSID and BSAD .
    If it is the case of partial payment then BSID-BELNR doc u will find a  field BSID-REBZG in which you will find the refrence field which is havving the BSAD-BELNR location . this is how it is mapped .
    what is your ful req is not much cleared to me ,
    rgd aryan

  • Interest calculation on overdue amount payable to vendors

    hi gurus
    i have a doubt on interest calculation on overdue amount payable to vendors,can you tell me interest calculation procedure.

    hope below link are useful"
    http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sapfj001.htm
    http://help.sap.com/bestpractices/BBLibrary/Documentation/J03_AR_BPP_05_EN_SG.doc
    pls assign points as way to say thanks

  • Calculating tax condition amount

    Hi all,
    I am  confused on how the system calculates tax conditon amount (let' say MWST) in sales order. In my system the tax condition type mwst has a condition record maintained of 4%  thru VK11 and a tax code V0 assoicated with it.
    The base value for calculating the tax amount for mwst is taken from the SD pricing procedure and so the tax amount is calculated in sales order.... However I need to know that in FTXP for the tax code V0, there is a tax rate of 4% maintained against it and an account key mws and a GL account. Is MWST also maintained in FTXP for the relevant tax procedure for 4% ???. I need to know whether for posting to tax GL account for condition type mwst, does the system calculates the tax amount thru tax procedure  and if yes then how the system takes the value of BASB (base amount )in tax procedure in FTXP  for calculating the tax amount.
    regards
    sachin

    Hi Sachin
    Is MWST also maintained in FTXP for the relevant tax procedure for 4% ???. I need to know whether for posting to tax GL account for condition type mwst, does the system calculates the tax amount thru tax procedure and if yes then how the system takes the value of BASB (base amount )in tax procedure in FTXP for calculating the tax amount.
    The values maintained in FTXP are just for record purpose. For every Tax we should have a particular GL account, so that we can find the total tax in a period of time whenever required.
    But the actual calculation of tax is happening at pricing procedure level only. Tax is calculated based on base price in pricing procedure. Also assigning that amount to GLs assigned against them in VKOA.
    Hope this clarify your doubt.

  • Overtime Amount not to be added as Basic

    Hi All,
         Here, at our client, an Infotype is created for Overtime and the amount is paid through IT 0015.
    While calculating the 'Tax Exemption on HRA' the basic amount is taken as Basic + OT  ( /114 + Approved OT Amount).  But as per the scenario, only 'Basic' is to be counted for HRA Tax Calculation.
    Can any one suggest if any changes to schema has to be done? if so where we need to change?
    Regards,
    Sailaja

    Check the PCL for that wage type in V_512w_D mainly check the CC
    not sure which one will upadate u
    Check CC14
    and check with hemanths response
    Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 24, 2009 4:50 PM

  • Calculation of Tax Amount in FB60

    Hi Guru's,
    Here Tax Procedure is TAXINN in which I have maintain Tax Code V9 as 14.42% (EXCISE+CESS) + 12.5% (VAT) in FV11. So while doing MIRO I select V9 Tax code then automatically Tax amount is calculated.
    My question is can same can done in FB60. Means can Tax amount can automatically calculated in FB60 when I selecting V9 as Tax Code which was calculated in MIRO.
    I needed for transaction without Purchase Order.
    Right answer will be rewarded.
    Regards
    Amit

    Thnks for reply.
    I have already done the customization in OB40 but when i do invoice posting in FB60 then error shows "Tax Code V9 does not exist in TAXINN".
    But since in MIRO same Tax code get posted with same vendor.
    Pls help me.
    Regards

  • Calculation of interest amount with two variables formula

    Hello everyone,
    Iu2019m facing a problem with the way that TRM calculate the interest amount for money market transaction when I have a formula with two variable, e.g. reference interest rate u201CXu201D multiplied by 0,98.
    Some contracts explicitly say that to obtain the u201Cdaily interest rateu201D of the contract firstly the u201Cdaily interest rateu201D of the reference interest rate must be calculated and then apply a index or factor (e.g. 0,98). In the other hand some contracts says that it should be done the other way around. Iu2019ve noticed that TRM calculate the interest amount using the first way.
    Is there any way to set which the way the interest amount should be calculates?
    Has anyone faced similar problem?
    The examples below illustrate the difference in the two ways to calculate interest amount.
    Considering the following money market transaction:
    1. Borrowing structure:
    1.1. amount: USD 1.000.000,00
    1.2. flow type: 1105 u201CBorrowing/Increaseu201D
    2. Term (only one day to simplify the example)
    2.1. Start date: 30.01.2011
    2.2. End data:   31.01.2011
    3. Interest structure:
    3.1. Interest form: VARIABLE ( formula = Z1 * 0,98), where u201CZ1u201D is a reference interest rate
    3.2. condition type: 1200 u201CNominal interestu201D
    3.3. Interest calculation method: ActW/252
    Considering that Z1u2019s annual interest rate in 30.01.2011 is 11,66%, TRM would perform the following calculation:
    1. Contract annual interest rate (%) = Z1*0,98 = 11,66 *0,98 = 11,42680000%
    2. Convert from u201CContract annual interest rate (%)u201D  to number = 1,11426800
    3. u201CContract daily interest rateu201D = 1,11426800 ^(1/252) = 1,00042945
    4. Convert from u201Cnumberu201D to Day interest rate (%)  = 0,04294481%
    5. Interest amount = u201CContract daily interest rateu201D * Borrowed amount = 0,04294481% * 10.000.000,00 = 4.294,48
    In the other hand, some contracts say that the interest rate should be calculated in the following way:
    1. Annual interest rate (%) = 11,66  = 11,66000000%
    2. Convert from u201CAnnual interest rate (%)u201D  to number = 1,11660000
    3. Daily interest rate = 1,11660000 ^(1/252) = 1,00043775
    4. Convert from u201Cnumberu201D to Daily interest rate (%)  = 0,04377480%
    5. Calculate u201CContract daily interest rateu201D = 0,04377480% * 0,98 = 0,04289930%
    5. Interest amount = u201CContract daily interest rate (%)u201D  * Borrowed amount = 0,04289930% * 10.000.000,00 = 4.289,93
    With this simple scenario  we end up with a USD 4,55 difference for a single day, but for big contracts of hundred millions and for several years the difference is quite  huge.
    Thanks in advance ..
    Giuliano

    Hi,
    with Product Category 550 you can have both scenarios:
    for the 1st case you can use a formular (e.g. EONIA * 0,98)
    => interest for 1 day: 462,70 EUR
    for the 2nd case you can use the field Variable Interest Rate (EONIA) + field Payment Rate (98)
    => interest for 1 day: 453,44 EUR
    Is this, what you are looking for?
    Regards,
    Lorenz

  • Wrong Calculation of Tax Amount

    Hi to All,
    While making Down Payment Request (F-47) with reference capital PO, system is showing a warning message as below:
    Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount      45,766.25), correct      36,882.24 INR
    Message no. FF707
    Diagnosis
    The system checks the tax amounts for each code on document level. However, the amounts entered deviate more from the amount calculated (using the percentage rates defined in the tax code) than is allowed considering rounding errors.
    Procedure
    If this message is a warning message, you can confirm that your entry is correct by pressing "Continue".
    If this message is an error message, you should correct the tax amounts or the base amounts, depending on how your tax code is defined.
    For more clarity: whatever the tax code is in PO same tax code giving in F-47. But in both scenarios system calculating differently.
    what could be the reason? Please guide me?
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

    Hi SDNer,
    Thanks for your reply.
    As you said, In PO system does not calculate tax based on the tax code,it will calculate based on the pricing procedure.
    Now my doubt is whatever the tax amount is showing in PO that we need to enter in to F-47,But here system is showing
    (Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount      45,766.25), correct      36,882.24 INR).
    Now what should I do? Please help me on this..
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

  • Calculation of overtime

    Dear Gurus,
    We are using CATS for time recording and I need to calculate overtime by the following formula
    Overtime Rate = Gross Salary - 3 Wage Types / Total Working hours per year
    In the above formula the amounts of three wage types are subtracted from gross salary and then it is divided by total working hours per year to calculate overtime rate.
    The overtime is single from 5:00 to 6:00 and after 6:00 overtime is required to calculate as double.
    Please your guidance is required
    Ali
    Edited by: Ali Rehman on Mar 11, 2010 11:53 AM

    SAP Gurus please guide me to resolve my overtime issue
    Ali

  • Disable auto-calculation of tax amount by Autoinvoices to import AR Invoice

    Hi all,
    I am using ra_interface_lines_all to do AR Invoices conversion to Oracle R12. My legacy invoices data contains tax amount and some of the invoices do not have any tax. Autoinvoice auto-calculated tax information during import even for those invoices that have no tax.
    I checked my AR interface record and made sure none of the tax-related columns (e.g. tax_code, tax_amount, etc) are populated. I also checked the AR transaction source for conversion and make sure tax-calculation flag is not set.
    Basically I need to set the tax amounts manually instead of letting the system to derive it. Some suggested to set tax_exempt_flag to "E". I tried but Autoinvoice complained that I need to have tax reason and besides I have many invoices that have tax amounts.
    Any suggestions on disable the auto-calculation of tax?
    Thanks! Mike

    Hi Mike,
    U r using transaction types to generate your distributions, right?
    Try to insert distribution info for each of your invoices in the table ra_interface_distributions_all, specifying REC, REV and TAX (tax where applicable) lines.
    Hope this will solve your prob.
    Vik

  • Calculation of Coverage Amount

    Hi All,
    I am new to configuring benefits, can anyone of you guide me how to configure the calculation of the coverage amount if i want to calculate it based on a fraction of the annual salary.
    Also I would like to know where do we configure the assignment of wage types for displaying the Employee Cost Paid and the Employer Cost paid on the payslip.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Anjali.

    Hai..
    SM30, V_512W_D.. Give ur country..
    Then select ur basic pay wage type.. double click on it.. check processing class 1. Maintain specification 1.. for ur basic pay wage type only.. for rest of the wage types which u copied.. maintain processing class 1 specification 0..   Dont change Processing classes of standard entries..
    manu

  • Tax Calculation on Base amount in FB60

    Dear All,
    My client wants to calculate tax on base amount in FB60,
    he receives invoice from vendor with 6 items(i.e., 6 different types of expenses gl)
    and in that invoice he get the total tax amount not individual tax amount, here is the example :
    item 1       - 1402.50
    item 2       -  855.50
    item 3       - 3780.00
    Sub total   - 6038.00
    Tax 19%   - 1147.22 (tax amount for above 3 items)
    Total       - 7185.22
    In FB60 the system is calculating the  tax on net value i.e., we have to enter the total amount (7185.22) in header level and line item we have to enter the amount including the tax value
    item 1     -  1668.98 (1402.50 x 19%) - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same.
    item 2     -  1078.05 (855.50x 19%) -  - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
    item 3     -  4498.20 (3780 x 19%)  -  - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
    he is getting this type of invoices more and he dont want to do calculation for each and every item
    Please advice on this issue as early as possible.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    JS

    Thanks a lot Pascol
    Regards
    JS

  • Tax procedure for VAT calculation on Base amount + WHT amount

    Hi All,
    Needed your inputs on definition of tax procedure, to calculate VAT tax where base amount + withholding tax amount are tax base components.
    E.g. in AR line item:
         Revenue:  950 (FB70 ->Editing options:  calculate taxes on net amount check box is enabled)
         WHT: 50 (5%) (Re-grossing method using)
         VAT: 70 (7%)
    To achieve as above how to define tax procedure: current procedure definition as below.
    StepCounter-Ctyp----Description-From--To
    100--0---     -BASB--Base Amount 
    117--0---     -J1W1Output Tax----100
    118--0MWS1-Subtotal--100----117
    120--0---     -MWASOutput Tax------118
    Please through some light on this.
    Thanks in advance.
    SK

    Dear all,
    Any comments please.
    Highly appreciated calculating VAT tax on base amount and WHT (re-grossing up).
    Thanks in advance.
    SK

  • Calculating TDS in amount splitting in MIRO

    Hi experts,
    In MIRO Transaction there is an amount split tab where I put the vendor retention momey Rs 9362.34/- and  in another line the rest of the amount Rs.40000/- which i have to pay to the vendor by F110 transaction code ,the total bill value is Rs 49362.34/-.The particular vendor is subjected Withholding tax (at the time of Invoice posting).
    After Simulation system is calculating Withholding tax on both i.e Rs 9362.34/- and Rs.40000/-.
    *Can anybody tell me is there any process that system will calculate Withholding tax on the total bill value i.e Rs 49362.34/-for one time and after payment RS.40000/- by F110 transaction code the Retention Money will be seen as Open item in Vendor ledger?*
    with regards,
    sudipto paul

    problem was resolved

  • Percentage calculation and zero amount entries get dvision by zero error

    Hello, i am calculating the total of a field and then reporting the contributions of that line entry in percentage form but when a line has a zero amount i get an error of 'division by zero'.  I'll give some explamples below incase i'm not explaining very well.  If you replace the 225 under amount with 0 that is when i get the error.
    code sample..
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    numbervar n := {@Total Weight}% Sum ({@Total Weight}, {JSALES_REPORT.SOPNUMBE});
    data sample...
    Amount      % of total
    150             40%
    225             60%
    (375)

    Hi Rod.
    I'd recommend using and IF statement to deal with division by zero.  I'm not sure what you exactly want to do with records that have division 0 but I usually do the following to see which records are creating the div by zero errors and then decide how I want the values to be displayed after evaluating it.
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    if {whichever.field} = 0 then 9999999999  // this would be an indicator to me to take a look at this record
    else
    numbervar n := {@Total Weight}% Sum ({@Total Weight}, {JSALES_REPORT.SOPNUMBE}); // your original formula
    You can then change the 99999999 number to whichever number you think should be viable to answer your business question on items that are divided by 0.
    Hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error in ABAP Objects program - SAP BI

    Dear All, While trying to update infoobject /BIC/ZGROSSPRI in an ODS in BI through an update routine, a syntax error is thrown when I am trying to define a variable of type tys_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI. How is it possible to define a variable of type targ

  • Could not find prepared statement with handle %.

    Greetings. I've seen several posts for this error on the web, but no clear cut answers. I captured the code below in profiler, with the intention of replaying in mgmt studio. However, the attempt end in the following error: "Could not find prepared s

  • PLANT FOR GOODS ENTRY DIFFERENT FROM PLANT IN PURCHASE ORDER

    Good Morning. My customer, asked me, if it was possible to make a purchase order in a single company and relevant purchase organization and plant, and the  goods entry for another plant referred to another company. Ex. Purchase Order for Company 01 a

  • I need some interview Question

    Hi Masters, I am the ABAP/4 Consultant...I learn the SAP Netweaver XI. Now I am trying the Job in XI.I have 3 interviews in this week end... So please give the SAP Netweaver XI interview Point of Questions. Its is Very useful to me.... Please Help me

  • Error upgrading in-place virt. appliance from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1

    Hi all, I deploy in my virtual environment a new virtual appliance 7.0.1 and configured it the network. When I try to upgrade in-place my production virtual appliance I set ip address of new appliance and after few minutes server respond that "New ve