Can't settle to an asset

I am getting the following message when trying to settle to a new asset:
AW666 System Error: Master area for proof of origin not found, when settling to a new asset.
Any ideas how to resolve. This is very high priority...I need to resolve ASAP
Thanks
AG

hello Ana,
It appears that the asset master data is incomplete. Could you give steps you are doing to understand your problem better?
Vishal.

Similar Messages

  • Without IM how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset

    Dear all
    without IM, how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset.
    can someone explain it in details?
    thanks a lot.
    Judy

    thanks for all of your answers.
    i create the investment profile and assgin it to the project profile.
    when i release the project, i see the system status changed from crtd to release and AUC.
    when i do cj88, the costs are settled to the AUC No. automatically.
    could you tell me how the AUC No. is created? where does it configure?
    when AUC is settled to FXA, what are the procedures?
    first TECO the project and then do CJ88, am I correct?
    thanks a lot
    Judy

  • Actual cost of Production Order settled to Fixed Assets

    Dear all,
    My client is doing in-house production of moulds (internal order suggestion is not accepted by the client) for which
    they have the following
    1. BOM
    2. Machine hour
    3. labour
    4. overhead etc
    5.plan value
    6. actual value
    Can i settle the actual cost of production order to Fixed Asset ?
    If yes
    what are process kindly give me if any process other then the below
    1.production order created
    2. settlement profile - FA is settlement optional
    3. allocation structure
    4. Asset created
    5 define asset in settlement rule
    Kindly give me your valuable input
    regards
    elango

    Hi,
    Although i am not CO expert , please check with your FICO consultant who are expert before make the final call.
    During settlement to a G/L account or a fixed asset, the system ignores additional account assignments that were manually specified in the distribution rule.
    Based on what i know .
    you can stipulate that settlement may be made to cost centers and orders, but not to fixed assets.
    The Settlement profile is something that you need to create a settlement rule to settle the actual costs of a sender object.
    About the Settlement rule is something that  contains the distribution rules for the sender. It will define how the way to settle the cost.
    Allocation Structure
    In the settlement structure you combine the primary and secondary cost elements into groups, in which debits are then posted to the sender objects. For each group, you specify whether (for settlement to a given receiver type) settlement is performed
    by cost element or using a settlement cost element.
    For example, you might use settlement cost elements:
      To document the purpose of an order (such as, repairs or maintenance)
      To reduce data volumes (you can combine a number of debit cost elements
    under one settlement cost element).
    TQ

  • CJ88 Cannot proceed with FUL settlement to Final asset

    We have a PO with WBS as account assignment. Users posted a down payment to this PO in 12/2010 and when they ran the settlement Type 1 (Automatic) it posted a DP posting to the AUC transaction type 180.
    In Standard SAP transaction, this will get reversed if the users post the invoice and executes CJ88 again.
    Now, our problem is that, the invoice was not posted until now, and the DP is still open in the AUC. THey want to do  settlement to the final asset but is getting an error CJ88 type 3 (FULL)
    *ORIGINAL Error:* You cannot post comp. retirement for asset 102000121 0 with this trans.type
    Message no. AA341
    Diagnosis
    A down payment was posted to asset 102000121 0. In depreciation area 01, if not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
    Procedure
    Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
    FY 2010 is now closed in asset. I tried posting an ofsetting entry for the DP on FY2011. I used ttype 181. I tried to re-setlle type 3 (FULL) but now, the error message refers to Area 32
    *AFTER POSTING TTYPE 181:*You cannot post comp.retirement for asset 102000121 0 with this trans.type
    Message no. AA341
    Diagnosis
    A down payment was posted to asset 102000121 0. In depreciation area 32, if not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
    Procedure
    Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
    Our Dep area 32 is configured to take values from 01 but reflect it in USD and it is set to AREA NOT POST.
    Does anyone have any thoughts why the system is checking area 32 if its deriving values from 01?
    Additionally, how can i clear the DP in 2010, with a posting in 2011 and be able to execute the settlement to final asset.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Please review the note 35309.                                                                               
    As the long text of the error suggests, the cause for this error is  most likely down to downpayments which are not yet settled.                                                                               
    In general the settled down-payments and their clearings should be balanced to ZERO in the settlements.
    In investment measures with summary settlement you will always get  the error AA341, if the down-payment balance is not zero.
    Regards Bernhard

  • Settlement to capitalised assets

    I have an asset which has already been capitalised, we have since spent more against the project budget and I now need to settle this spend into the same asset somehow.
    Please advise which txn I should use to do this?  I have looked in the project accounting, project control and asset management manuals but can't seem to find what I am looking for.
    Thanks all in advance.
    Points assured for all the replies.
    Rg
    VK

    Hi Vijay,
    Please go to Transaction code CJ20N, select the WBS and go to settlement rule via  edit > Cost and set the receiver as the fixed assets itself instead of AUCV since AUC has been transferred to main assets.
    You can then settle using CJ8G or CJ88 but CJ88 is a better option.
    Regards
    Bharat

  • AUC settled to wrong Asset

    HI,
    I have done AUC settlement, But in Settlement rule i have given wrong asset by mistake. Now can i revse it and re-do the settlement to correct Asset? If i revrse it, will Depreciation also reverse?
    Please advise
    Thansk

    Hello
    Use TC CJ88 but period should be open for this reverse settelment
    Regards,
    Rakesh

  • Auc line item settlement to main assets

    Dear all ,
    We settled AUC assets Building  no.91000002 in main assets Building No. 40000005 from using T-Code aibu and aiab. , we select line item to settle in main assets. After settling we got document no. eg. 4000002 ,, but i want see all line item settled to main document no 400002 ,  i have check SE16 table ANEKPV not showing my settled line item ,, pls give any tcode which  line item selected to settled to eg.document no 400002. but we not using order no , wbs , project , i have check tocde KO88, AB03,CJID, kO02, AR01 Not find ,  how to know my selected line item, more details find the attachment ..pls help me
    Regads
    Ajay

    Dear Sir,
    Thank for reply  ,  i have checked e.g doc no - 1234561. then go environment and click original document, when i select it show two line item (list of assets document ) when i select main assets docs then go to overview assets docs , not go to CJ88 , so i am not able to resolve this issue , Pls help me ,,,
    if anybody know pls give me ans asap,,,,
    thanks
    Regards
    Ajay

  • User status for investment order to block settlement to final asset

    Hi,
    I try to set up a user status to avoid user to settle internal/ investment order to final asset. I cannot find a user status that will let me make the distinction between the automatic settlement to AuC and the partial or full settlement to final asset.
    The process we are using is that we do automatic settlement from investment order to AuC on a weekly basis and as soon as the final asset has been entered via KOB5 (distribution of line item) we would like to setlle it.
    Do you know a way to set up a user status on an internal order to allow settlement to Asset under construction but not to final asset?
    Thanks
    Sabine

    Hi,
    I do not want to send the costs directly to final asset. Costs booked against the investment order should always first go to AuC and then to final asset. What we try to avoid is to have the 2 settlements immediately one after the other. We would like to have the settlement to AuC on a weekly basis and the other one only when capitalization is required. But if the final asset is already entered in the settlement rule of the order via KOB5, then there is a risk to settle to final asset. We would like to  only run the second type of settlement only when the asset is ready to be capitalized. To be able to do that we thought about using the user status. For example, if status is "release", we could settle to Auc but not to final asset and if status is "approved", we could settle to final asset.
    Do you see what I mean? I need a status that allows me to perform some transactions and another one that allows me some other business transactions. The problem is that the 2 settlements I am talking about are not recognized as business transaction but as processing type.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks
    Sabine
    Edited by: Sabine Janssen on Oct 14, 2009 10:46 AM

  • Can we settle refurbishment order periodically

    Hi All
    our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
    In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
    They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
    can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
    It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material

    Hi,
    Please note that in refurbishment case cost is settled to material and this settlement need to be periodic.
    You can do settlement after TECO. TECO is technical completion and settlement can be done after TECO also.
    However as you said cost are settled to cost centre ,but how it is possible coz settlement receiver is material and not cost centre for refurbishment.They may not able to see correct costs in respective period but cost will always get settled to material(means added to inventory accounts after settlement).
    It is advisable to settle incurred costs on refurbishment order as early as possible,so costs will reflect into inventory accounts and within correct period and this is standard practice also.
    regds,
    atul
    Edited by: Atul Mali on Apr 15, 2009 1:52 PM

  • Where Can I settle an enhancement to delete a sales order item according to the data in BDOC from CRM?

    Hi expert,
    I have an urgent requirement from the client.
    Delete the sales order item totally in ECC.
    I planned to implement this enhancement in ECC. Check the data in BDOC from CRM middleware, according to the user status in the order item,decide whether the item can be deleted.
    My question is,where can I settle this enhancement? The BADI name,user exit?
    Thanks in advance.
    Jerry.

    Hi Jerry,
    It may be delayed. you may found the solution.
    Use BADI CRM_DATAEXCHG_BADI and try the code in MBDOC_FILL or BAPI_FILL method.
    Regards,
    Bala

  • How can I settle invoicing plan with defining withholding TAX Parameter

    Dear All
             Please kindly help me to answer this question, How can I settle invoicing plan with defining withholding TAX Parameter.
    I've already create PO Framework Order by specify Invoicing Plan Periodic automatic settlement.
            But, We can found with holding  tax parameter on the tab of invoicing plan in PO.
           Please help me.

    Hi,
    From my understandinging in case of withholding tax there is no provision to manage from procurement side.
    At the time of MIRO or payment run users have to select the applicable      
    withholding tax code ( During MIRO withholding tax pop up will appear).  
    Withholding tax is a component within FI: FI-AP-AP-Q  
    Regards,
    Edit

  • PS Settlement to Final Asset

    Hi,
    Please explain to us how we do the settlement to final asset in PS. Thank you.

    So in short
    u2022     When you want to settle to AUC use the distribution rules with settlement type AUC (generated by system) & processing type periodic.
    u2022     When you want to settle to FXA you should use the settlement type Full & processing type partial capitalization / automatic.
    However the processing type Full settlement is used for the settlement rules with distribution rules of settlement type PER (Periodic) only, in to check weather the balance still exists in the object after the settlement due to debits to previous periods.
    So, don't get confused with settlement type FUL (full settlement) & processing type Full settlement. (Processing type full settlement has nothing to do with AUC)
    Regards,
    ANSAR

  • AUC from Investment measure can't settle to the completed asset partially.

    Dear.
    I using IM module and AUC which made from Investment measure.
    and I post cost to Investment order and settle to AUC periodically.
    Some amount In nvestment order should be tranfer to the completed asset. so remained amount in that should be keep going on.
    But, Investment order settlement rule only can be maintained by FULL settlement method.
    It means, all amount that accumulated in Investment order must be settled.
    What I want to do is the partial amount settle to the completed asset and remains left in investment order.
    Of course, this investment order keep its function as collect the amount of AUC.
    How can It be?

    Hi,
    Use KOB5 - Give the settlement rule - mention the required amount and asset code
    Use KO88 and settle the asset by selecting Settlement Type - Partial Settlement
    Regards,
    Muralidhar

  • How can I see costs on WBSelement before settlement on definitive asset

    Hi,
    We have direct investment on WBSelement (posted as statistical value -value type 11- on WBS element). So at order entry, we get for example 100€ on a classe 23 account (asset under construction account in french chart of accounts).
    When the AuC is settled on a definitive asset (20 or 21 account in french chart of accounts), then we have "0" as final value on the AuC account and nothing on the definitive asset account.
    We would like to see "100" as actuals costs as those costs have to be compared to planned values. So in the report painter I customized the actual data column with only "D" as Debit/credit indicator. This works ... until we made mistakes while posting. For example we posted 20 by mistake on the same WBS element and we reverse this incorrect posting. Reverse posting is also (technically speaking) registered with "D" as Debit/credit indicator. So in my example I get 100 + 20 = 120 € as actual costs ... which is wrong as I should get only 100 €.
    In actual line items, we get the following postings :
    23180100 (account) / 100 € / D / "order entry on AuC" / reversed = " " / reversal document = " "
    23180100 (account) / 120 € / D / "posting registered by mistake" / reversed = "X" / reversal document = " "
    23180100 (account) / - 100 € / C / "reversal of incorrect posting" / reversed = " " / reversal document = "X"
    23180100 (account) / - 100 € / D / "transfer to definitive asset" / reversed = " " / reversal document = " "
    Could anyone help me on this issue ?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards.
    Benjamin

    Hi,
    We have direct investment on WBSelement (posted as statistical value -value type 11- on WBS element). So at order entry, we get for example 100€ on a classe 23 account (asset under construction account in french chart of accounts).
    When the AuC is settled on a definitive asset (20 or 21 account in french chart of accounts), then we have "0" as final value on the AuC account and nothing on the definitive asset account.
    We would like to see "100" as actuals costs as those costs have to be compared to planned values. So in the report painter I customized the actual data column with only "D" as Debit/credit indicator. This works ... until we made mistakes while posting. For example we posted 20 by mistake on the same WBS element and we reverse this incorrect posting. Reverse posting is also (technically speaking) registered with "D" as Debit/credit indicator. So in my example I get 100 + 20 = 120 € as actual costs ... which is wrong as I should get only 100 €.
    In actual line items, we get the following postings :
    23180100 (account) / 100 € / D / "order entry on AuC" / reversed = " " / reversal document = " "
    23180100 (account) / 120 € / D / "posting registered by mistake" / reversed = "X" / reversal document = " "
    23180100 (account) / - 100 € / C / "reversal of incorrect posting" / reversed = " " / reversal document = "X"
    23180100 (account) / - 100 € / D / "transfer to definitive asset" / reversed = " " / reversal document = " "
    Could anyone help me on this issue ?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards.
    Benjamin

  • Vendor details along with amount settled to an asset in an investment project.

    Hi Guys,
    Here we are following std process i.e. PR/PO with WBS as account assigned, then GR-GI/SES and then settle it to AUC and then in the end to FXA.
    Now the requirement is to capture all the line item details (including vendor with the amount) settled to asset. I have tried a lot and get the WBS, AUC from FXA and the CO doc., FI Doc. & the settlement doc. but not able to link CO doc. of settlement to the GR-GI CO document.
    Can any one help me on this or can suggest any other work around?
    Thanks & regards,
    Soubhagya

    Hello Soubhagya,
    With % settlement it looks difficult because what if you have total actual cost (6 line items) is 60K and you want to distribute it among 5 FXA on line items wise, as you will be maintaining % distribution rule (12%) but your objective to get the report is like distribute 2 line items(actual) cost to FX1, 1 line item cost to FX2 and so on..
    For that,It will be more appropriate to maintain settlement by 'Amount' also.
    Now,for development of this report, it is actually very difficult because we lose the track of line item details (VT 4) when we reach at settlement (WBS->AUC) ,as we have only the total cost only to be adjusted/distributed and it goes the same way till FXA.
    Even if a report is to be developed then I can think of some 'Reference Fields' at GRN- > Settlement (AUC) -> Settlement (FXA). All these documents should be posted w.r.t. this reference field and ABAPer has to collect the line item details with this reference field and show in the o/p against an asset number.
    (Development of these formats/screens for running actual transaction in background is a tedious job ) And obviously that would be applicable for new projects (new GRNs) only.
    For existing one, it looks near to impossible to me.You can have few words with ABAPer to discuss on it.
    Regards
    Saurabh

Maybe you are looking for

  • "You do not have sufficient access to uninstall" following CF9 silent install

    When running a silent CF9 install I'm unable to remove the product, either through control panel or running the uninstaller directly.  The error is "You do not have sufficient access to uninstall Adobe Coldfusion 9.  Please contact your system admini

  • Partial Submit button and fields resetting

    Hello I have a button with partialsubmit=true In the button's action listner event I open a popup and this popup contain RichInputText fields. Before open the popup I am reset all of these RichInputText values by this.geRichInputText1().resetValue();

  • Unable to open a pdf after downloading new version

    I downloaded Adobe Reader version 11.0.04 for Mac 10.7.5.  When a pdf is opened from the web, I can view but the print preview is blank and I can't print.  When I save the pdf from the web and try to open the file, I get an error message "The file [f

  • Aperture and iPhoto Slide Show

    I am new to Mac and considering Aperture. I shoot with a Nikon D70s and use mostly jpg and some RAW. After editing in Aperture, would I need to export the images to get them into iPhoto for a slide show; either RAW or jpg? Not knowing exactly what I

  • Update oracle long field

    Hello: I'm trying to update an oracle long field with a prepared statement. Here's the code: objCallableStmt = objConnection.prepareCall( "{call spUpdatetblContract(?,?)}"); objCallableStmt.setInt(1, intContractId); objCallableStmt.setAsciiStream(2,