Cannot create AR Invoice negative amount with WithHolding Tax negative amount via DI API

Hi All,
I tried to create AR Invoice Document via DI API, but with negative amount and negative withholding tax amount.
Document added successfully, but when i open the document in SAP, and i open WTax Table information, withholding tax amount become zero,
Please see image below.
But when i add the same document through SAP Screen, i can fill WTax Amount with negative amount.
SAP Version 9.0 PL 5
Please kindly help,
Thanks
Best Regards
Siddharta

Hello.
If this is different to the behavior of the B1 application it should be considered a bug - like any such difference between DI API and app.
HTH

Similar Messages

Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 invoice

Hi Friends,
Need your help again.
Using T. Code FB09, i can change WHT base as long as the invoice is not cleared. However, how to change WHT base where a particular invoice has been cleared?
I have actually made some cchanges to configuration where by i have removed tick for 'line item not cleared'. Ideally with this setting it should allow me to change to WHT base. But the same is not happening.
Can any one help me out with any other steps that are involved.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Rajanikanth

Hi Rajanikant,
Please review note 363650 here you will see the following
information;
C) Change Rules for classical and extended withholding tax
      If the withholding tax base amount should be changed after a
      docment has been paid already, the following steps are required:
      For Classical Withholding Tax and only if the withholding tax
     amount is zero.
     Change of withholding tax base amount or withholding tax code of a
     cleared invoice.
     If the withholding tax base amount and/or the withholding tax code
     needs to be changed after an invoice has been cleared please follow
     steps;
As you see from the above information the following quotation "only if
the withholding tax amount is zero".
If a withholding tax amount other than zero has been posted, you cannot
change the values via transaction FB02.
Please also review the IMG documentation for transaction OB32 via
spro -> Financial accounting -> Financial accounting global settings
-> Document -> Line item -> Document change rules, line item.
here you will see the following information;
Document Change Rules, Line Item
In this activity, you determine under which circumstances fields within
posted documents can be changed.
Note
For a number of fields, the system itself determines that they can no
longer be changed after posting. This includes all fields which are
central to the principles of orderly accounting, for example, the amount
posted and the account.
The system also prevents the update objects from being changed in
documents which have already been posted, independent of the document
change rules
Thus as you can see from the above description if an amount has been
posted to the account you cannot change the fields despite entering in
the field in OB32 as changable.
with kind regards
Cora

Post document with BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with withholding taxes

Hi everyone!
I have to post some documents that I got from an Excel file. At first, they were G/L documents, so I only filled the table parameter ACCOUNTL of BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST to set the "account data" (without using ACCOUNTRECEIVABLE, ACCOUNTPAYABLE, ACCOUNTTAX or ACCOUNTWT).
After a few, another Posting Keys were allowed in the lines of the documents obtained from the excel file, so the documents can be G/L documents, receipts, etc.But, I still put every account data in ACCOUNTGL, and the created documents were right (at least nobody complained about them :P ).
No, 3 fields have been added in the excel file:
- QSSHB: Withholding Tax Base Amount
- QSFBT: Withholding Tax-Exempt Amount (in Document Currency)
- QSSKZ: Withholding Tax Code
As I understood, this BAPI is ready to allow withholding taxes, and I suppose I should have to fill this fields that I receive into some tables that are used as parameters in the BAPI. For example,
ACCOUNTWT-WT_CODE = Withholding Tax Code
ACCOUNTWT-BAS_AMT_LC = Withholding Tax Base Amount (Local Currency)
I think I should use this table (I don't know where I could "put" the other one). My question is, can I do that without using tables ACCOUNTRECEIVABLE and ACCOUNTPAYABLE? My feeling is that is not completely right not to use these tables if the documents are vendor or customer documents... If that's possible.. is it right to put the 2 fields that I have used in the last example (*) to fill that? Where I should put the third field??
I hope I have explained myself clearly, thanks in advance,
Victor

Dear Sreeraj,
The situations would be multiple, but to be precise I'll provide you one scenario where this BAPI would be failing to do the posting. The scenario is like this:
1. If you consider GL posting using F-02 by changing any of the reference fields XREF1, or XREF2, the BAPI has to consider the varying screens of each of the line items which internally depends on Transaction Variants of different screens of the Document, which the BAPI will fail to do so.
2. Also, if there is a Taxation to be done for each Item, still it should consider the above scenario and fill the WITH tables accordingly.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
-Wahid Hussain.

LSMW RFBIBL00 withholding tax base amount in local currency cannot be updated by manual

Hi SAP Guru,
When I try to upload FI docs by program RFBIBL00 in LSMW, the field BWITH-WT_QSSHH(withholding tax base amount in local currency) cannot be updated.
(1) The LSMW structure is defined as bellow:
     BGR00<--------DOC_HEAD
          BBKPF<--------DOC_HEAD
               BBSEG<--------DOC_ITEM
                    BWITH <--------DOC_WHTX
And fields in structure BWITH are defined as bellow:
Field Name
Type
Length
Field Description
STYPE
C
1
Batch Input Interface Record Type
WITHT
C
2
Withholding tax type
WT_WITHCD
C
2
Withholding tax type
WT_QSSHB
C
21
W/tax base amount in document currency (batch input
field)
WT_QSSHH
C
21
W/tax base amount in Local currency (batch input
field)
(2) When I run LSMW, the doc can be posted successfully. All the information can be updated as the data I upload. Only the field WT_QSSHH is calculated by system automatically according to the current foreign exchange rate.
(3) When I try to post this doc by manual(F-02), the field WT_QSSHH is not editable.
How can I change the field WT_QSSHH into editable and update this field in LSMW RFBIBL00.
Thank you very much!
Eric

Hi Nikitha,
I tried posting an invoice in currency other then co. code currency, but the WT amount is getting calculated perfectly.
also checked vendor with foreign curr recon account. the WT is working for that also
Can you please share the screen shot of the transaction where after changing currency you are not getting the values picked up for WT
May be i have not understood your questions
Regards
Pragya

F110: how to pay an invoice with Withholding Tax and a credit memo?

Hi All,
in my SAP I've defined a Withholding Tax type for Payment Posting.
I've posted a vendor invoice with with Withholding Tax.
Later I've posted a credit memo with Withholding Tax which must compensate the prevuois invoice.
When I launch t.code F110, SAP, in the right manner, proposes to pay the invoice less the amount of the credit memo.
But the calculation of the Withholding Tax (that it should post al the payment time) is wrong: SAP proposes to post the amount of the Withholding Tax recorded in the table WITH_ITEM at the moment of the posting of the invoice. Instead, from it, SAP should detract the amount of the Withholding Tax recorded in the table WITH_ITEM at the moment of the posting of the credit memo.
Why does SAP doesn't consider the amount of the Withholding Tax of the credit memo?
Could anyone help me?
Thanks

Dear Rossi,
if You defined the WT TYPE at the payment time this means that the WT amount will be calculated at posted during the F110 run as per the invoice as per the credit memo.
If they are the same amounts and refer to the same wt type and code, when You run F110, they should match even for the WT calculation. It is clear that if You inserted manually the WT base amount or the WT amount into the invoice, the system will not do any automatic calculation but it will use these amounts that can be different from the one auto matically calculated by the system for the credit memo.
I hope this can help You.
Mauri

FRM-47001: Cannot create parameter list aamir : list with this name exists.

Sir I use parameter list in my form whose name aamir first time when I call report system give result right but second time I call report then system give this error
FRM-47001: Cannot create parameter list aamir : list with this name exists.
Please give me idea how I get print view second time
Thank
aamir

Hello aamir,
Use the following to delete existing parameter.
DECLARE pl_id ParamList;
BEGIN
pl_id := Get_Parameter_List('tempdata');
IF NOT Id_Null(pl_id) THEN
Destroy_Parameter_List(pl_id);
END IF;
END;
Cheers,
Suresh

Withholding tax base amount is wrong for sales invoice

Dear Gurus,
we had generated invoice for cop (colombia paiso) 1377350 as follows
sales a/c cr         1080000
sales a/c cr             90000
sales a/c cr           114400
sales a/c cr            92950
vat     a/c cr            33176
w/h   a/c dr            36911(withholding tax account)
customer a/c dr 1373615
The wiholding tax rate is 3.5%. it is applicble only for first line for cop 1080000. we had applied withholding condition to that line only. The vat amount cop 33176 is 16% on cop(92950+114400). There is no withholding tax or vat on line for cop 90000. when we post the invoice, the withholdng tax base amount change from 1080000 to 1054598 and system post the wihholdng tax for cop 36911 instead of 37800. In sales invoice there is no possibility to change the base amount mannually in condition. it is grey area.
we had check the configuration part about maxmimum amount,minimum amount,withholding tax base amount,calculation procedure.withholding tax type,withholding tax code. Nothing is found wrong.
you early answer is highly appreciated
Reagrd,
Rajesh K

Hi
Cheque Go to Menubar of which document you have to post for getting the WHT value Menubar Settings - editing options - remove the tick calculate tax on net amount.
Rgds
Vani

Withholding tax base amount problem

Hi experts,
I have WT configured like this:
Base amount: Gross
No accumulation
Minimum/maximum: Type level (both)
Central inv. prop. + Check min. base amnt at pmnt doc level
In minimum/maximum per Withholding tax type: Minimum base amount "$500"
The problem occurs when i try to pay an $250 invoice , the system calculates withholding tax for this case but it shouldnu2019t (because the invoice amount is less than $500). This vendor has only one invoice to pay.
The weird thing is this problem happen only for a few vendors, i´ve created a test vendor, exact the same as the "problem vendor" and for the new one, the system is not calculating the withholding tax (its working fine)... I donu2019t know what else should i see...
Thanks in advance
Jorge

Steve,
My problem is when i try to pay an invoice smaller than the minimum base amount, the system calculates the WHT. This problem is only with a few vendors, but others, with same master data are working fine. I never did changes in those vendor master data, so the program its no necesary in this case.
Thanks for answering.
Regards,
Jorge

With holding tax base amount not picked correctly.

HI
While calculating WHT we have 2 problems.
1) The wht base amount is updated 4 times in all tax type i.e Basic ,Surcharge, cess and se-cess. (upto Sep 09 postings)
Example My vendor inv for Rs.540279 i have to deduct 2.266% WHT
Display withholding tax information screen is updated with following setup
W/Type W/base     W/tax
1            552806      11056      Basic
2            552806        1106      Sc
3            552806          243      Cs
4            552806          122      SEcs
2) In vendor line item layout we include WHT/base amt- wht tax amt column. Some cases W/base & W/tax it is displayed. But in few cases it is not displayed. How to display this in all cases.
Please guid me how to change this display to show the correct W/base amount. What settings i need to maintain in Img.
With regards
RSS.

Hi...
Please Check the in vendor master records wether you have ticked the Liable check box or not for invoice at the same time you have to uncheck Liable for payment
Defore that you ahve to create
1. Define Min/Max Amounts for Withholding Tax Types for invoice
2. Define Min/Max Amounts for Withholding Tax Codes for invoice
after that you have to enter in the vendor master like
Enter Withholding Tax Types
Enter Withholding Tax code and Select liable for inovice
Enter Type of recipient
I hopw it will helps you
Regards
vamsi

BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for debtor with withholding tax

Hello,
I'm using the BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST to generate debtor invoices applying withholding tax.
In order to obtain the withholding tax information, I'm using structure ACCOUNTWT, but when the document FI is generated, it has not line item for withholding tax, and table WITH_ITEM has no values for basis amount and withholding tax import, though the withholding indicator is there.
With help of a colleague from basis team, I've been debugging the process and all the parameters seem to be OK. So I guess there's something missing that is doing table WITH_ITEM is being informed incorrectly.
Another point is that I'm not sure if it's necesary to inform component SECTIONCODE (Withholding tax section) in structure BAPIACAR09 (Debtor position), and in this case, which value it expects to be passed.
Could you, please, help me with this issue? Any idea will be welcome.
Many thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Miriam.

Hi Maurizio,
Many thanks for your reply!
I've checked the parameters you said, and they seem not filled. I'm going to ask a basis colleague for analyzing what's missing and doing the corresponding modifications.
Thank you very much once again
Regards,
Miriam.

Issues with Withholding tax on advance paid

Dear Experts
Our client deducts TDS on the Advance amount paid and on posting of Invoices from the Vendors. The documents are posted with withholding Tax types configured for this purpose in F-48 and FB60 respectively. Document splitting has been activated in the system with all required configuration.
The problem arises when we try to clear the advance amount against the Invoice along with the balance payment in F-53 if the invoice has more than one expense line posted to different Cost Centers in FB60. The system gives an error message " Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled ". Please follow the example given below for better understanding.
Advance posting:
vendor a/c....dr (Profit center 3)
To bank Clearing (Profit center 3)
To TDS on payment
Invoice:
Expense ....dr (Cost Center1 / profit Center 1)
Expense ....dr (Cost Center 2 / Profit Center 2)
To vendor a/c
To TDS on Invoice
Up to here the document splitting works fine with Profit Centers and segments getting displayed in all line items in GL view. The issue comes when we select both the documents in F-53 and try to pay out the balance amount.
Please note the issue does not crop up if we do not populate the withholding tax code while posting the advance entry. The system automatically posts to the relevant profit centers and segments in F-53. But this is not the business scenario.
It would be really helpful if somebody can throw some light on the above issue.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: sid_das on Dec 14, 2011 11:26 AM

Resolved at our end.

Extended Withholding Tax - Minimum Amount

Dear SAP Expert,
In our setup we have extended withholding tax incoming payment for outgoing invoices.
The scenario is if invoice base amount is less than 300 EGP (local curreny) then withholding tax information should not capture invoice document.
I setup minimum based amount on withholding tax type and withholding tax codes level but still when user post outgoing invoices WHT information is captured in FI document.
Because of above issue automatic clearing (F.13) is not happening and we are getting error message like "Items with withholding tax code for customer subject to withholding tax"
looking for expert assistance.
B/R
Prashant Rane

Dear Mani,
Thanks for assistance.
from your example I understand if invoice amount is less than 10,000 then WHT should be applicable.
In my example min invoice amount is 300 EGP
where 2 % WHT is applicable
I wanted to know in which below field I should enter 300 EGP (from your example 10,000)?
Calculation > Withholding Tax Codes > Define Formula for calculating Withholding Tax:
Currency u2013 EGP
W/Tax Type u2013 I2
W/Tax Code u2013 P2
Valid from u2013 01.01.2009
To base amount - 999,999,999,999
W/Tax Rate u2013 2%
Reduced Withholding Tax Rate for Exemption u2013 BLANK
Reduction of Base Amount u2013 BLANK
Decreased Reduction of Base Amount - BLANK
Below is complete customizing I did in my setup
Financial Accounting
Financial Accounting Global Settings
Withholding Tax
Extended Withholding Tax
Calculation > Withholding Tax Type > Define Withholding Tax Type for payment posting:
Withhld tax type u2013 I2
Base Amount u2013 Net Amount
Accumulation Type u2013 No accumulation
Control Data u2013 W/Tax base manual, manual W/tax amnt, w/tax for payments, no cert. numbering
Base amount u2013 W/tax code level
W/tax amount - W/tax code level
Minimum check u2013 Min. base amnt check at doc invoice level
Post W/Tax Amount - YES
Calculation > Withholding Tax Codes > Define Withholding Tax Code:
Withhld tax type u2013 I2
W/tax code - P2
Base Amount u2013 Pecentage subject to tax 100%
Postings Indic- 1
Calculation u2013 W/tax rate u2013 2%
Calculation > Withholding Tax Codes > Define Formula for calculating Withholding Tax:
Currency u2013 EGP
W/Tax Type u2013 I2
W/Tax Code u2013 P2
Valid from u2013 01.01.2009
To base amount - 999,999,999,999
W/Tax Rate u2013 2%
Reduced Withholding Tax Rate for Exemption u2013 BLANK
Reduction of Base Amount u2013 BLANK
Decreased Reduction of Base Amount - BLANK
Calculation > Withholding Tax Codes > Minimum and Maximum Amounts
Min / Max Amounts for W/Tax Type
W/Tax Type u2013 I2
Currency u2013 EGP
Valid from u2013 01.01.2009
Min W/Tax Amount u2013 60
Max W/Tax Amount - 999,999,999,999.00
Min base amount u2013 300
Min / Max Amounts for W/Tax Code
W/Tax Type u2013 I2
W/Tax Code u2013 P2
Currency u2013 EGP
Valid from u2013 01.01.2009
Min W/Tax Amount u2013 60
Max W/Tax Amount - 999,999,999,999.00
Min base amount u2013 300
W/tax base exem amount u2013 BLANK
Company Code > Assign WHT Tax Type To Company Code:
Company Code u2013 0011
W/Tax Type u2013 I2
Customer Data u2013 Subject to W/Tax

How to clear line items with withholding tax manually

hi Experts,
i posted a vendor invoice with withholding tax and i made payment as well but not through f-58.
now i wanted to clear these two through f-44 but it gives the message withholding tax information ignored and didnt display the invoice as open item.
how do i clear both the trasactions
regards
suresh

hi Praisty,
thanks for the reply
i have a second opinion on your statement that no matter whatever tcode you use for payment it will clear the open item. Even in F-58, if u make partial payment it will not clear you open item. But i didnt use f-58 as i said earlier.
i used FBV1 for parking the document through which i entered the payment details...ofcourse it doesnt have the option for clearing the open items, cheque printing and it will not update your cheque register. i posted the parked document through FBV0. for all practical purposes, this is my payment document but it didnt clear my open item, in order to clear it i now used f-44.
regards
suresh

Withholding tax line amount exceeds message no.7Q320

Dear all,
Withholding tax type we are defined as a accumulated type. untill and unless it exceeds the minimum amount system will not calculate the withholding tax once it crosses the minimum amount system will calculate tds from one rupee on words. but now at the time of posting advance payment to vendor the system generates a error namely withholding tax line amount exceeds.
As per my knowledge i convert the error message into warning even i know this not the good practice but according to situation what i did is correct. at the making those changes the system asks the request (workbench). i save under one new request when i transported to another client the system is generating warnings.
when i transport the same from develpoment to quality the system generating error. i come to know this is through request status.
What is the solution for this
Thanks & Regards,
Sankar

Hello
please go thorugh the menu path:
spro->img->Fin acct-> Fin acct Global settings->withholding tax->extended withholding tax->calculation->withholding tax types->defien withholding tax type for payment posting
give ur country key
double click on your W.T type
under central invoice option----you have to select radio button for central invoice & 1st p. pmt
this might solve porblem
please assing points if usefull
srinu

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Cannot create AR Invoice negative amount with WithHolding Tax negative amount via DI API

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for