Cannot see Average response time in Early Watch Report

I cannot see any values under Performance Overview.
Any suggestion
Edited by: Bill on Aug 17, 2010 6:16 PM

Hi Bill!!!
I have the same issue, how solved you this problem??
thanks in advance!!!
Regards

Similar Messages

  • ISA Server 2006 + Average response time for Non Cached requests = performance issues?!?!?!

    All,
    I am in a predicament with internet browsing speeds...We have a 3rd party look after our line and internet facing f/w  so I cant troubleshoot them, so at the moment Im looking at ISA as the potential bottleneck - we have a fairly standard environment:
    Internal > Local Host > Perimiter n/work > Firewall > Internet
    I have been running custom reports on the ISA server to see what data can be collected - I have noticed that "Average response time for non cached requests" (traffic by time of day) can be as high as 76 seconds!!!!!! Cached hits are between .5
    and 2 seconds.
    I have also coonfigured a connectivity verifier which is also flagging slow connectivity, massively over the >5000ms and also reporting "cant resolve server name on occassions- and this is configured for
    www.Microsoft.com --- DNS ???!?!, however I have looked through DNS (no obvious errors / config issues) which I can see 
    I have run the BPA on ISA server to ensure its Health - - connectivity verifier errors flagged timeouts to microsoft.com as expected...
    Can anyone advise any obvious areas to investigate as Im struggling! - as always the 3rd party have told us the internet pipe is fine :O

    Problem resolved.
    DNS forwarders have been changed on the ISA server / DNS and this has improved lookup speed considerably.
    thanks all :)

  • Average Response Times for a Reports Server

    On Application Server Control and Grid Control are sections listing the Average Response Time in milliseconds.
    Can anyone tell me what response it is measuring exactly?
    Thanks
    Andy

    See the Online Help for the page for a description of the metric. In Help, you can search for "metric" to see definitions of the other metrics.

  • Ping success rate against Average response time

    Hi All,
    I find this very weird, while I am pinging some host, and the host's Success Rate is for example below 40% while the average response time remains at around 5ms.Why Weird? Shouldn't it raise the Average response time if there were timeouts ( Success Rate ) on the proccess?
    This is causing problems to me, because I have implemented a script which changes routing between two different ISP's based on Success rate and Average Response Time.
    It compares both of the ISP's result to make the change, here is a piece of code which shows exactly what I want to do, maybe there's a better way to do it, if you have any ideas please share.
    if {$srate_isp1 >= $srate_isp2 && $avrg_isp1 <= $avrg_isp2
    :Make the change
    else
    Do nothing
    The problem with this is, if Success rate is below 40% and is worse than Success rate of ISP2 , and the average time remains better for ISP1, it will not make the change.I was expecting average response time to raise if the success rate is bad, but sadly enough its not going to happen.
    Btw, the script is in TCL, and I would share the whole script but its too long.If you need more bits of it, i'll share.
    Thanks,
    Uran

    This happens when wifi device in your computer re-scans wifi networks in background. 
    To reproduce this, run ping to any host and then click on wifi icon to display list of available networks - and you will see ping lag. 
    This can be disabled in registry - search for ScanWhenAssociated parameter inside HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM and set it to 0 everywhere (typically 2 occurences). After it restart wifi driver or computer.

  • [Weblogic 11G] FrontEnd Average Response time exploded

    --- windows server 2008 R2
    --- weblogic 10.3.2
    --- Sun JVM 1_6
    Good morning,
    We have an web app (war archive contained in an ear) deployed on weblogic cluster (2 managed nodes). This application is monitored through Wily Introscope and regularly I can see the metrics "FrontEnd-->Average response time" rockets to 100K ms.
    Effectively, some pages are loading very slowly...
    I'd like to know what should be monitored and the tricks and tips to make sure my Weblogic managed servers are configured correctly, how can I check that everything is OK on the "web container side"
    Thank you
    --Simon                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

    hey....
    maybe its be better off to open a generel discussion task on metalink....
    *T                                                                                                                                                                               

  • Cannot see or edit time of events in iCal

    I cannot see or edit times in iCal any longer, only dates. This affects only one user, so I guess that there is a corrupted user-specific resource file somewhere that I could try renaming/deleting. Does anyone have any ideas?
    I believe that this condition was triggered by creating an iCal event from Mail.
    More details and a screenshot at http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=8110912&postcount=10
    Thanks for any hints/suggestions.

    Eventually found in System Preferences -> International -> Formats that my region was set to "Custom". I have no idea how this happened - I certainly never set this directly through system preferences.
    I selected "United Kingdom" as my region, and the times showed up in iCal once again.

  • ASM & Average Response Time

    Greetings All, I was hoping that others may have some insight into DB Control and how is reports ASM Disk response times.
    First my environment:
    Oracle RAC 11g R1 Standard Edition, Patchset 12
    Two Node Cluster
    Windows x64 2003 R2 DataCenter Edition.
    I am leveraging DB Control to monitor the ASM instances along with the db instances. My issue is regarding how db control gathers metrics to report on average response time for the DISKS that make up the Disk Group.
    I have two issues:
    1.) The overall response time reported in db control for my disk group "DATA" does not jive with the average I calculate based on the numbers being reported by db control. E.g.) I have ten LUNS in my DATA disk group and if I calculate the mean avg response time from each individual disk as reported by db control I don't get the same number being reported by db control. The numbers differ by as much as 20%.
    2.) The numbers reported by ASM for avg response time for each LUN in the disk group are not the same from disk to disk. E.g.) In my current production environment here are the Avg Response Times for each LUN in the group:
    8.73, 11.38, 5.22, 4.13, 3.04, 15.84, 12.71, 12.91, 10.51, 9.25.
    I would have expected that these disks would have had the same avg response time because ASM is working to guarantee that each disk has the same number of I/O's.
    The disk array has identical disks for all 10.
    Further, the average for all disks as being reported by db control is : 7.28.
    If I do the math I get an average of 9.38, the % diff between these two numbers is 28%
    I have heard that db control does a poor job of reporting on ASM disk metrics but this is just people grumbling. I was hoping that someone out there may have some solid facts regarding db control and ASM.

    hey....
    maybe its be better off to open a generel discussion task on metalink....
    *T                                                                                                                                                                               

  • "Windows 8 using 100% of HDD with high average response times and low read/write speed"

    Turns out this is a fairly well known windows 8.1 issue that has been plaguing users since at least 2013 and there is no one simple fix, so it may not be *entirely* hp's fault; but I've had two of these laptops, both the same model, the first one needing to be returned and exchanged for an entirely unrelated issue (hardware failure: ethernet port nonfunctional with lights stuck on). Both are refurbished. Both have been extreemly slow and unresponsive even compared to a lesser Brazos powered laptop I had before, but I've only recently decided to investigate why. 
    So if there is something HP specific going on here, I hope there is one simple fix. My average response time has gone up as far as well over a minute (>60,000ms), so I may be an outlier case here compared to the typical windows 8.1 hardrive responsiveness/bandwidth problem. 
    Edit: there is a case with another HP pavilion laptop (intel powered though, so it may be an intel storage driver issue described in the first link) being much, much worse.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Guess what just now happened again
     So using DISM did _not_ fix it.

  • ST03N Tcode not showing last 3 days average response time

    Hi,
    In my Production system not showing last 3 days average response time.In our production 1 (CI+DB) and 3 dialog instances are there. In all servers sapcollector working fine but in all servers not showing last 3 days values.Please advise solution.
    Thanks,
    Srinivas.

    The following are the prerequisites needed to get the workload monitor(st03) working.
    1)      The system time zone of the SAP and the Operating system has to be same. This can be done by customizing time zones of the SAP using the Tcode STZAC.
    2)     All the standard background jobs has to be scheduled to run. This can be done by scheduling the standard background jobs using the Tcode SM36.
    3)     The following parameters has to be added to the instance profile.
    Parameter                                                  Value(default)                                                  Description
    i.     stat/as_collect                                                          = 2                                          Application statistic: detailed records.
    ii.     stat/as_level                                                              = 1                                          Records for application statistic are active.
    iii.     stat/max_files                                                           = 48                                        Max. no. of stat files to be kept.
    iv.     stat/as_max_files                                                    = 48                                        Max. no. of appl. stat files to be kept.
    This can be done by editing the profiles using the Tcode RZ10.

  • Average Response Time ASM

    Hi,
    Installed 10g RAC SE on Enterprise Linux 64. We have two ASM instances with 2 disk groups DATA and FRA. Database Control reports for disk group DATA (that consists of 3 RAID 5 vol.) that Average Response Time is 54-58 ms. Read Response Time is around 40-45ms. Everything is done to Oracle recommendations with a large stripe size and so on. We don't have performance problem but should not the response time be better? Can someone else share response time values for comparison?
    Regards Lars

    Grid Control always has been notoriously bad at measuring I/O performance of ASM, sadly. The service time numbers are usually high, and the IOPs numbers often are not IOPs so much as "I/Os to date with periodic resets to zero" numbers.
    As the previous poster said, use iostat. On Linux, iostat -x, the svctm column.

  • Average Response Time for Reports

    Hi Gurus,
    I am using OAS 10.1.2.0.2 with Business Intelligence and Forms Installation.
    Previously I have never seen Average Response Time of Reports server greater than 10000(ms),
    But It is increasing continously and now within 2-3 days it has increased upto 114668(ms)
    CPU Usage (%)          N/A
         Memory Usage (MB)          N/A
         Average Response Time (ms)          114668
    its Maximum queue size is 1000....
    I am not able to find out why it is increasing in this manner.....
    plz help..
    Thanx

    Hi,
    Today it has been increased upto 170236 ...
    Thanx,
    Santosh

  • Average response times for VA01 and VA02 transactions

    Hi,
    we have some users complaining about response times, more specific for VA01 and VA02 transactions. We would like to compare our average response times to those of other companies in order to get an idea of what is acceptable to most companies. If you are willing to contribute, can you please send a few hours of STAD data (only for VA01 and VA02 transactions) of an average working day? Perhaps you can download the data into a spreadsheet and mail the zipped file to my account Many thanks.
    Best regards,
    Guido Van Leuven

    Hi,
    This is not the issue. We are investigating everything possible to improve our response times and we believe that that these are ok as well. We just want to build a case where we can prove that our response times are not worse than those at other companies and that we can do only by comparing those statistics.
    Best regards,
    Guido Van Leuven

  • Incorrect Alerts CPU Time and Average Response Time

    BUG
    My Alert on Web app is consistently behaving incorrectly.
    If I set an alert to monitor CPU Time at threshold 1.5 seconds, it's actually set to 1.5 milliseconds even though the graph shows a dotted red line at 1.5 seconds. The alert will trigger at 1.5 milliseconds threshold. So, instead, I have to set threshold
    to 1500 seconds - the graph is completely useless showing a red dotted line at ~24 mins but the alert does then go off when CPU time goes above 1500 ms (aka 1.5 seconds).
    The original portal alert seems to be fine - this problem is on new portal only. Unaffected by browser type - all browsers do the same thing (Just has to be said before someone asks).
    This seems to apply to all metrics using seconds (Average Response Time acts in the same way)

    Hii...
    Am sure you are much aware " Components Response Time spectrum"
    ########Analyzing Performance Problems#################
    --High wait time: Insufficient number of free work processes
    --High roll-wait time: Communication problem with GUI, external system,
    or large amount of data requested
    --High load and generation time: SAP buffers (Program, CUA or Screen)
    too small
    --High database request time: CPU/memory bottleneck on database server;
    communication problem with database server, expensive SQL statements,
    database locks, missing indexes, missing statistics or small database buffer(s)
    --High CPU time: Expensive ABAP processing, for example, processing
    large tables; inefficient programming
    --Processing time more than twice CPU time: CPU bottlenecks
    If time aloows look at
    Note 0000008963 - Definition of SAP response time/processing time/CPU time
    Rgds

  • Early Watch Report - Archive EWA

    Hello,
      I have configured Early Watch Report in my Solution Manager 4.0 on Windows Server 2003 4 weeks back.
    EWA report is comng perfectly  but in my Solution for each server I am able to see only 2 (Latest one and  Next Schedued) EWA report at a time.Not able to see previous week report.
    How can I see my older EWA reports ??
    Thanks,
    Chandresh Pranami

    hi.
    maybe you have configured that older reports are deleted after two weeks...
    there is a possibility to customize - i think its under transaction solution_manager.
    normally, they never go away.
    regards,
    martin

  • RFC configuration for system monitoring / Early Watch reports

    Hello Basis Gurus:
    Please help me out.....
    The early watch reports in the solution manager of my system are failing consistently to execute.This is happening for all the 3 systems DEV,QAS,PRD.when i click on individual earlywatch reports it takes me to a screen which says  "data for this report is overdue.....go to your satellite system SDCCN to see why the data was not sent...."
    It says ...check the following things.....
    "The RFC connection for the SAP Solution Manager system is not working.
    The 'Task Processor' background job, which collects the session data, has been changed.
    Problems arose while data was being collected (see the detail log for the task that collects the session data).
    A periodic 'SDCC Maintenance Package' task has not been scheduled to check whether your SAP Solution Manager system requests session data."
    I can see the task processor job , and the periodic Maintenance package scheduled everyday and completed sucessfully.So is it the RFC which is causing the problem.
    Im SM59 of the solman, i can see system generated RFCs for the PRD,DEV,QAS and SND  (...3 for each of these systems...).
    say for PRD, these are the 3 RFCs.
    1.)SM_PRDCLNT<client#>_READ.
    2.)SM_PRDCLNT<client#>_TMW.
    3.)SM_PRDCLNT<client#>_TRUSTED.
    I am not sure which RFCs among the 3 for any given system does the solman use to communicate to the satellite systems.
    *The user id section in the Logon Data of any of these RFCs is blank.and the password says "is initial"...*is this correct.Does the user id have to be a communication type of user...
    PLeaase advise as to what could be going wrong..
    Regards.

    Hi,
    The system uses ABAP Connection (Connection Type 3) to connect to different Systems to execute Functional Calls.
    Now in your case, there are 3 different connections meaning your Basis Team has used 3 connections for different connection activities. This is totally a business dependent scenario.
    Now each time you create a RFC Connection, the system will need the following information to remotely call another system, they are:
    Host Details of Target System
    Logon Details to remotely login
    For RFC Connections the User Type has to be Communications User. But there are companies which use Dialog User Types as well to remotely login for some cases. When the User ID is created for an RFC User and a Password is assigned to it, this Password is considered as the Initial Password by the system. This Password is taken as the Initial Password in the RFC Connection as well.
    There can be cases where the system is Trusted and there is no need of a password, but an Username is mandatory in all cases. Remember if you set the system as Trusted, the password option gets deactivated and the connection wont work, if the system does not have the Trusted status.
    But in any case you must assign the Username alongwith the Client and Language Details in the RFC Connection for it to work.
    Hope this helps.
    /Manoj

Maybe you are looking for