Canon 6D images way too dark in TV mode

When taking lacrosse and football photos, I prefer to set Canon 6D to TV mode using 1/500 or 1/640 with appropriate ISO for time of day or night. In the Spring in late afternoon / early evening games. After having no problems for say first 100 photos, the camera in TV mode starts setting aperture too high (say 9, when just before was 4.5 in identical light), thereby creating photos that are way too dark. I shoot with sun behind me, so the natural light is pretty consistent, while the aperture selected automatically in TV mode jumps around wildly.
To avoid missing too many shots when this occurs, I move to Manual mode, keep speed at 1/500 or 1/640, and set aperture to correct number. I'd prefer camera do the work while I zoom in and out. and as the sun begins to set.
I never had this problem with other Canon DSLR's. Also, the camera behaves once it's totally dark and I'm depending on stadium lights.
Am using Canon 6D with Canon 70-200 mm EF IS II USM.
Suggestions?

My guess if you've dialed down exposure compensation as well... and it's easy to do accidentally.
In Tv mode, the front dial (by the shutter button) controls your shutter speed, but the rear dial controls "exposure compensation". The rear dial will only be active to do this when the camera meters the exposure... e.g. half-press the shutter button and then turn the rear dial to adjust exposure compensation. The rear dial also controls exposure compensation in P and Av modes as well.
You can see if you've done this by looking at the meter either on the top LCD or through the viewfinder. In Tv or Av mode, the arrow normally points to the center mark if exposure compensation has not been adjusted. (this is the scale that shows -3..2..1..|..1..2..+3 )
You can also adjust exposure compensation via the rear LCD by pressing the [Q] button and navigating to the -3..2..1..0..1..2..+3 scale and then pressing the 'Set' button and it'll let you change the compensation.
The center position on the scale means you want to use the exposure recommended by the meter. But you would want to use exposure compensation in situations where you realize the meter is unlikely to be accurate. Camera's use a light meter that measures reflected light coming off the subject. A hand-held (aka "incident" light meter) measures light falling on the subject (you actually walk up to the subject, hold the meter in front of them/it and take the reading while standing in the subject light). An incident meter is extremely accurate becuase it's measuring the light itself... not a reflecttion of the light. A reflected meter is subject to the fact that some subjects will reflect more light back to the camera than others. E.g. a "white" subject reflects significantly more light than a "black" subject.) Hence cameras tend to attempt to overexpose when shooting scenes dominated by dark or black objects and they tend to underexpose when shooting scenes dominated by mostly white or light objects. The compensation control allows you to tell the computer that want it to shoot for an exposure darker or brighter than what the meter believes is needed.
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

Similar Messages

Fusion HDR Pro 32bit way too dark

Hi,
I often use Fusion HDR Pro in 32bit mode with final ajustements in ACR to control high contrast situations.
I now have un issue in PS CC 2014 with a fusion image (in ACR) which is way too dark and contrasty.
The same treatment in PS CC (not 2014) with the same images works fine.
Any idea what could be the problem?
Thanks,
Jo

After some researches, I deleted the Photoshop folder with all the presets an restarted PS, Fusion HDR works fine again.

Some images printing too dark

I have two cameras that I use with iPhoto 6.0.4. A Canon G4, and a Pentax ist D. In iPhoto both cameras have nice looking images. The images from the Canon make beautiful prints, but the Pentax images print too dark. How can I fix this? Can I set different printing preferences for each camera?

whenever I calibrate my iMac with the Spyder2 hardware, I have to calibrate it twice because I always forget to turn off the Screen Saver and the Energy Saver 'Put Screen to Sleep' option.
another important thing about calibration. where is your 'book located during the calibration? what lights or on or off? is there any direct sunlight shining on the 'book?
personally, I prefer to calibrate at night with all lights turned off. if I calibrate at day, I shut the tinted doors and turn all (fluorescent) lights off. I realise that you are supposed to calibrate under your normal lighting conditions but I prefer this method

ISight image is too dark

I bought this iSight used from a friend and the image is too dark. My friend never used it so, he doesn't know anything. When I use iChat, Skype or Photobooth, the image is just too dark. I have looked endelessly for a solution and can't seem to find it. The box didn't bring a cd driver. I don't even know if it ever had one. Is there anywhere I can go to so I could change the webcam settings or any software that I must require to have?
Best Regards

Hi Mike,
You can adjust and brighten your iSight settings using iGlasses:
http://www.ecamm.com/mac/iglasses
If the image is really, really dark, it could be a more serious issue.
One known issue is a problem that can happen after installing Boot Camp. Take a look at this thread if you've installed Bootcamp:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2926603
Thanks,
Glen

My movies which were bought from iTunes play way too dark in iTunes.

My movies play way too dark in iTunes. This is only the case when I connect my Mac Mini to my TV through HDMI. What's strange is that when the subtitles in the movies come up the picture goes to the correct brightness. Normally, however it is different to see most of the scene when it is a night shot or a dark scene. The brightness on the TV does not seem to affect it, I believe this is a software issue. Are there any controls for picture quality that I am missing?

You device has limited capacity.
If you have toooooooo many movies, that occupy toooooo much space, you will not be able to add any movies oor music without deleting something else.

Safari 4 UI is way too dark, can't read bookmarks bar :(

Hi guys,
I have an issue with Safari UI. It's just way, way too dark for me. Bookmarks bar is especially hard for me to read. Why is Apple using a dark gray background and black text? It's incredibly hard to read. I don't have vision issues (I have 20/20 vision) and yet I find it straining to even look at the bar for long periods of time. And why don't they allow "favicons" to show up on the bookmarks bar? I think allowing favicons to show would improve usability too.
What can I do?

Unfortunately, you'll just have to live with it; Apple has made their design decisions for the UI so they are consistent across all (or most) of their applications. If you have a PowerPC Mac, you may want to try Unify to lighten the UI of Safari and other applications. It may not work with Safari 4, and whatever you do, make a complete bootable backup of your hard drive before you install it, and Repair Disk Permissions after that, then restart Safari to see if it works.
Favicons are not cached due to the fact that they occupy a lot of space, and that will slow down Safari, so there is no provision for allowing that at the present time.

The Godfather DVD is way too dark

I've tried changing monitor and calibrations settings but nothing helps much. It's just way too dark, I can barely make out faces and objects, especially during night scenes.
Any suggestions?
I have the 2001 DVD Collection.

Have you also adjusted the settings in DVD Player? Go to Window/Video Color for the Brightness, Contrast, Color, and Tint controls.
If your normal desktop looks fine, you should not have to change any monitor settings.

Photoshop saves JPEG images much too dark--any ideas?

Hi there, I'm having an issue with my Photoshop applications and I was hoping someone could give me a little insight/help in fixing the problem.
When working with a file in Photoshop (I am an artist, so I usually create my files from scratch rather than loading them from a camera), I can get the colors to appear as they should in the workspace. When I finish artwork, I make sure the colors are exactly as I want them, then save it as a JPEG file. However, if I open this JPEG file in any application--browsers, photo viewing programs--it is extremely dark and saturated. If I open the JPEG in Photoshop, though, it looks fine. This issue seems to have occurred spontaneously 3-4 months ago. I don't recall changing or deleting any of my monitor or video card preferences, or my color profiles. I was working with Photoshop Elements 4.0 at the time, and it suddenly started happening.
Now, I have found a sort of work-around for it. If I screencap my workspace with the artwork open in it, then I can open up that screencap in Photoshop. The colors are much TOO bright and washed out when I do this, but if I crop the image so it's just the artwork and save it, then it displays in browsers and viewing programs more or less as it should, i.e. how I see it in Photoshop. However, if I open that JPEG in Photoshop, it will display much brighter than the original artwork.
It's not a desperate issue since I have this weird work-around, but I'm currently trying to save images for printing--which means they need to be very large, and I'm not keen on zooming to 100% and screen-capping the art piece by piece, then stitching it all together before saving it. I'd really like to get this issue resolved. I thought it might have to do with the fact that I was using outdated software (PSE 4.0), but I've just recently upgraded to CS5 Extended and the same issue prevails.
If it's any help, I'm working on an HP EliteBook 8740w, with Windows 7 and an NVIDIA Quadro video card.
Here are the things I've tried, which haven't worked:
Deleting Photoshop preferences/settings (in both PSE 4.0 and CS5)
Uninstalling and re-installing both programs
Re-calibrating my monitor
Changing color settings in Photoshop (files still end up dark regardless)
Disabling OpenGL Drawing
Switching between file types when saving
I am at my wit's end! I am mostly concerned that my clients and professors aren't going to see my work as it is intended to look, when they view it online. The erratic behavior of too-dark or too-light, and my pictures seemingly never displaying correctly on any browser or in any program, has me a little paranoid about my online portfolio, haha. I'm applying for an art scholarship in a month, and if none of my work will save correctly (much less print correctly!) then it will be a sad day indeed!
As I said before, this problem seems to have popped up out of nowhere. My artwork from before the whole saving-too-dark issue began still displays perfectly in most programs, but the rest is totally hit-and-miss. If any of you have fixes or suggestions (even suggestions on adjusting Photoshop so that my images display more consistently in browsers and other programs) I would be extremely grateful.
Thanks so much for your time,
-Jenna

Though you have solved your problem, be aware, that different applications have different ways to interpret color profiles that can be set in different ways.
Example:
In Firefox, you can either set a color profile or not -- AFAIK, it only works with v2 ICC profiles (vs. v4, v3 seems to have not been released).
From that point, you can set perceptual, absolute, colormetric, or one other...(forget)... but usually you just set that to perceptual for monitor work as I understand it. Then a 3rd FF setting (all in its registry, of course, though occasionally there are extensions that let you manage the three settings. They correspond to values (accessible through 'about:config' in FF's address window), all under the prefix:
"gfx.color_management."
"display_profile" - text string of file containing a v2 ICC profile, usually in "C:\Windows\System32\Spool\drivers\color\" (at least on Win7) -- extention ".icm"
"mode" -- when to turn it on (2=for pics that have profiles set, another is for always (1?)), maybe 0=off?
"rendering_intent" - this corresponds to perceptual, abs, colormetric, types, I think 0=perceptual (default)
for FF, if you google one of those values, you'll find more info on some mozillian-type site... "prefix<keyname>" (e.g. - gfx.color_management.display_profile ).
Other progs may have their own or if we are lucky would use the system profile & color management system (assuming it is any good).
Getting an accurate monitor profile and keeping it updated as your monitor 'decays' (i.e. color is usually best when new, then they decay, w/useful life at max gamut ~ 18 months (in my experience), after that, you can still retune to the same white point, but with a loss of gamut due to the phosphors decaying at different rates).
It's best to use some sort of external calibration HW... -- as an external device looking at your monitor through it's various colors is the only way to get a 'digitally objective' measurement. That said, I always have concerns about the stability of the measuring device over time. Does it have components that that could cause non-linear measurement? Am guessing not as likely, as it isn't emitting anything so less wear & tear, but I wouldn't assume it's 100% accurate over time either (but certainly is better than one's own eye which can gradually adjust to just about anything). I had a viewsonic when I first got my current color device (a Spyder3), and it had gone from an original white point of 6500K down to 5700K -- and I had not noticed the difference (over 18-20 months)...
I could bring it back in range, but had lost gamut, and was a bit below the sRGB (consumer grade) standard (which is some fractional
value of the Adobe Photoshop or NTSC standards, which are similar in the size of their ranges, but slightly offset from each other).
The result of all this -- I never really know how my images will look on other monitors, but I try to tag them w/my current monitor profile, hoping that if they care about color, they'll have some SW on their end that can make sense of it...but given my own experience in how SW on the same system handles color differently, I wouldn't say they were 'high hopes'... ;-)

Photo images are too dark

Photo images loaded into Safari or Facebook, by me or by others, are too dark and I can't find a way to improve them.

Thanks Peter & Sid. I appreciate the advice, but it doesn't match our experience over 12 years of designing web applications so I'm having trouble understanding what's different, can I ask for any more advice you might have?
If we calibrate the monitor using the recommended tools, will Photoshop images look 2-3 f-stops brighter (i.e. as they should look) and will images in all other apps (which look fine now, have always looked fine) look 2-3 f-stops too bright? Or would we be changing JUST the way Photoshop sees the images?
Through probably a dozen different previous CRT and LCD monitors, we've never calibrated anything. Even on our immediately-previous Samsung 213T monitor, images appear pretty much the same in Photoshop as they do in all other places. That includes published web sites viewed with several popular browsers and viewed on literally hundreds of different systems inside and outside of our office.
The previous monitor was being used with exactly the same software and hardware as the new one. The only thing that's changed is the monitor.
Peter asks about brightness or white point luminance. I haven't used any tool to determine that. The monitor is set to 50% brightness, for whatever that's worth, but I can tell you that it is substantially BRIGHTER on white than the previous monitor. The previous Samsung monitor is being run side-by-side with the new one, and it looks quite dull and yellow beside the new one (and we thought it was a great monitor!) The new 30" Samsung has MUCH whiter whites. Does that help even a little?
Thanks for any further advice.

Images print too dark from Photoshop CS2 and CS3

Having used both CS2 and CS3 I now realise that the prints that I work on in either appear much brighter on the screen that they do when printed, as much as 3 stops darker when printed. I have also noticed that in other programs such as Google Picasa that I use as a viewing tool the images appear closer to the images from the printer. I have used various pro-labs that require their profiles to be used and my own epson 3800 printer at home and despite trying lots of different settings I am unable to get prints that look like they do on the screen they are always darker.
I am using windows XP on a dual core 2.4 PC with 2 Gb ram and an ATI Radeon X1600 series grafix card which I have just updated the driver on. The monitor is an LCD type and is calibrated weekly using a spyder 2 express.

First isolate whether your display is too bright or your printer is too
dark. I'd start by printing images from another source and see if they
look as they should. www.drycreekphoto.com has a number of calibration
images that should do for this purpose.
Once you've isolated the problem, we can take it from there.

Images printing too dark

Hello all...I'm using FrameMaker 7 to produce a .ps file, then creating a PDF with Acrobat Distiller v8. The newsletter we're printing has images that are darker than the jpeg's used, they're displaying fine in Frame and the PDF. This process had been working fine until I upgraded to Distiller v8. I'm trying various different settings, inc Optimise for Portability in Frame, nothing's worked so far to improve the situation. What about RGB and CYMK settings in Distiller. Using Press Quality.

It is the same AI/PDF file.
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:01:23 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Problems printing from iMac
    Re: Problems printing from iMac
    created by Jacob Bugge in Illustrator - View the full discussion
Sudzy,
Is it the same AI/PDF file or are there two, created on either computer?
In the latter case, there may be different Color Settings/calibration/something of the kind.
     Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/6003328#6003328
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/6003328#6003328
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/6003328#6003328. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
           Start a new discussion in Illustrator at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/thread/416458?tstart=0.

Photos suddenly way too dark?

Okay, here's the info:
-Just updated to Mavericks (works fine)
-Updated iPhoto
-When I launch iPhoto on my MacBook, all my photos look fine
-When I connect my external monitor, the photos look too dark.
-I've confirmed that the Color Profile for the monitor is properly calibrated--it's JUST iPhoto
-When I scroll between photos, they momentarily look exactly like they ought to look; but once they've fully loaded, they suddenly become extremely dark again
Any ideas?

No--you evidently didn't understand what I said. As I indicated, EVERYTHING ELSE looks fine on the external monitor. On websites, in other photo apps, in Preview--everything looks exactly the same whether on my internal or external monitor.
It's ONLY in iPhoto that things look messed up. The photos, as they're loading, look correct; as soon as they've fully loaded up, they suddenly become so dark as to be difficult to see--everything else on the screen remains looking exactly the same. And if I drag the window from my external monitor to my internal monitor, the pictures suddenly look okay again.
But, if I view a photo in Preview, it looks the same on both monitors, even as I drag it between the two. So, again, it's ONLY iPhoto.
Incidentally, this is a new problem--as far as I can tell, it only started after installing Mavericks.

Imported RAW images are too dark

I'm using Aperture2.0.1 and importing RAW images from a Canon 1D MkIII. All the images are coming in significantly darker than they show in the camera's display. The camera's histogram shows that the images are correctly exposed but they require boosting in Aperture's Exposure panel of anywhere from + 1.15 to 1.5 before they look right in Aperture. That's quite a hefty shift. I get a similar situation in Capture One Pro but the same images right off the card look bang on in Canon's Digital Photo Professional. In Adobe Lightroom it takes a shift of only +.5 to get into the right range. The exposure settings for the test were done with a Sekonic L-758DR meter and manually setting 3 580EX's but the problem shows up in all kinds of garden variety shots with or without flash. My preferred app is Aperture but I'm sick of having to adjust all my shots to get them into range.
Is there something I'm missing here?
Thanks,
Geoff

AMAZING!! Thanks for solving this mystery for me. Disabled the Highlight Priority and the shot comes into aperture looking like I it needs no adjustment. There are some clipped peaks in the histogram so there are some minor blown highlights. If I use Highlight Priority, it prevents the clipping and when I adjust the exposure level in Aperture the shot does look right without losing the highlight so Highlight Priority may be the right way to go when I'm shooting jewelry. But your post explains why the images were darkened.
Thanks again,
Geoff

Prints way too dark

OS windows 7 64 bit PS CS6 Printer Canon Pro 100 Eizo monitor all profiled
When printing A5 & A4 sizes resulting print is perfect
When moving to A3 or A3+ there is a slight colour shift and prints are unacceptably dark
I'm setting PS to manage colours with the appropriate profiles and printer managing colour box is set to none
Contacted Canon who asked me to try printing with Image Garden( a generic program pumped out with all Canon printers)
Whilst slightly light colours were OK but you can only print to paper stock sizes With this result Canon say its an Adobe problem
If anyone has some ideas I would very much appreciate.

Doesn't sound quite as severe as your issue, but I once had an issue with dark prints/lost detail coming back from a professional lab.
My system is profiled and well set up.....however, for some reason, my ambient light monitor controller monitor had switched off and my monitor got/crept brighter than it should.....that was the reason, and might be a contributory factor in your case.
All best

Photobook: Way too dark sRGB/Adobe RGB

I've just received my third photobook. We make one each year and the previous ones have been great. I already found out that it's advised to use only sRGB images. Since there are no warnings when importing with another profile or any profile-conversions, my 100+ euro book has some very dark pictures.
I'm not satisfied by the result. I'm no noob to colour (as a graphic designer) but is it so hard to check for a profile and convert it? It looks good on screen but the print looks bad.
Anyone had this issue before?

Contact Apple - http://www.apple.com/benl/support/photoservices/returns/
As to has anyone else seen this issue - yes - pretty much anyone who uses Adobe RGB has the issue of dark prints - if you want to avoid that then you have to avoid using Adobe RGB - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdobeRGB_colorspace - It is different than the sRGB color space - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRGBcolorspace - and is not compatible with the Apple printing service
The sRGB color space is well specified and is designed to match typical home and office viewing conditions, rather than the darker environment typically used for commercial color matching.
Ergo - use the Adobe RGB that is designed for commercial color matching and things will be darker
expect it - it is what it is - and don't use it if that is not what you want. It is not an error or wrong - but it is different and if you choose to use it then you will get the predictable results.
LN

Canon 6D images way too dark in TV mode

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for