Change history (for perticular condition type) in scheduling agreement

All SAP Gurus,
We have a scheduling agreement, in which certain condition (condition type for freight condition) value have changed several times.
Where we can find the changes in the value of this condition type?
Regards,

Hi Rajan,
You should be able to see in
Item -- Statistics -- Changes. You can find that line item wise.

Similar Messages

Condition Types in Scheduling Agreement(Urgent)

Dear Experts.
This is a query with reference to my earlier issue Changes in Condition ME32L.As per suggestions, to get validity periods i have clicked on Time dependent Condition In SPRO settings Under Define document Types.
After that i am not able to enter Custom Conditions while creating a Scheduling Agreement.So i tried by removing this Time dependent setting,then was able to enter Custom Conditions...
But i need to see validity periods too when i change condition types through ME32L...
So,Please give me appropriate Suggestion....
Thanks and Regards
MK

I'm not sure about your own pric proc, but in standard it should works, and also its apply per organization level.
RM0000 and RM1000
    Control the price determination process in POs, quotations, and
    scheduling agreements.
    Both calculation schemas require 2 condition types for the gross
    price: one for automatic price determination (standard: PB00) and
    one for manual maintenance (standard: PBXX).
RM0001 and RM1001
    Determine which condition types you can enter in purchasing document
    headers with time-dependent conditions (e.g. contracts).

Function module to change the value for pricing condition type

Hello experts,
I want to change the value for pricing condition type for an item in the transaction CRMD_ORDER.
I used many function modules but none are working.
Please kindly suggest a function module that will change the value for a condition type .
I have used the following function module but its not working, please correct the coding if anything needs to be changed or added. Please help me .
Thank you.
CLEAR PRCD_COND.
     SELECT SINGLE * FROM PRCD_COND WHERE KPOSN = WA_ORDERADM_I-GUID AND
                                          KSCHL = COND_TY.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
*    MOVE-CORRESPONDING PRCD_COND TO L_COND_CHG.
*    CLEAR L_COND_CHG-KBETR.
    L_COND_CHG-STUNR = PRCD_COND-STUNR.
    L_COND_CHG-KBETR = COND_PRC.
*    L_COND_CHG-KSCHL = COND_TY.
    INSERT L_COND_CHG INTO TABLE T_COND_CHG.
L_HEAD_GUID = CRMD_ORDERADM_H-GUID.
L_ITEM_GUID = WA_ORDERADM_I-GUID.
INSERT L_HEAD_GUID INTO TABLE HEAD_GUID.
INSERT L_ITEM_GUID INTO TABLE ITEM_GUID.
    CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
     EXPORTING
       IT_HEADER_GUID                    = HEAD_GUID
       IT_ITEM_GUID                      = ITEM_GUID
     IMPORTING
       ET_ORDERADM_H                     = LT_ORDERADM_H
       ET_ORDERADM_I                     = LT_ORDERADM_I
       ET_PRIDOC                         = IT_PRIDOC_RD
       ET_DOC_FLOW                       = T_DOC_FLOW
*     CHANGING
*       CV_LOG_HANDLE                     =
*     EXCEPTIONS
*       DOCUMENT_NOT_FOUND                = 1
*       ERROR_OCCURRED                    = 2
*       DOCUMENT_LOCKED                   = 3
*       NO_CHANGE_AUTHORITY               = 4
*       NO_DISPLAY_AUTHORITY              = 5
*       NO_CHANGE_ALLOWED                 = 6
*       OTHERS                            = 7
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_PRIDOC_RD TO L_PRI_COND.
INSERT L_PRI_COND INTO TABLE PRI_COND.
LOOP AT IT_PRIDOC_RD INTO LS_PRIDOC_RD.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_PRIDOC_RD TO L_PRIDOC_CHG.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-PRIC_COND = PRI_COND.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-REF_GUID = LS_PRIDOC_RD-GUID.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-COND_CHANGE = T_COND_CHG.
INSERT L_PRIDOC_CHG INTO TABLE PRIDOC_CHG.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT LT_ORDERADM_H INTO LS_ORDERADM_H .
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_ORDERADM_H TO L_HEADER.
INSERT L_HEADER INTO TABLE HEADER.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT LT_ORDERADM_I INTO LS_ORDERADM_I.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_ORDERADM_I TO L_ITEM.
INSERT L_ITEM INTO TABLE ITEM.
ENDLOOP.
L_FIELD-FIELDNAME = 'STUNR'.
INSERT L_FIELD INTO TABLE FIELD.
L_FIELD-FIELDNAME = 'KBETR'.
L_FIELD-CHANGEABLE = 'X'.
INSERT L_FIELD INTO TABLE FIELD.
L_INPUT-FIELD_NAMES = FIELD.
L_INPUT-REF_KIND = 'E'.
L_INPUT-REF_GUID = LS_PRIDOC_RD-GUID.
L_INPUT-OBJECTNAME = 'PRIDOC'.
INSERT L_INPUT INTO TABLE INPUT.
    CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
     EXPORTING
       IT_PRIDOC                     = PRIDOC_CHG
     IMPORTING
       ET_EXCEPTION                  = EXCEPT
     CHANGING
       CT_INPUT_FIELDS               = INPUT.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
REFRESH EXCEPT.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_SAVE'
EXPORTING
    IT_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE         = HEAD_GUID
*   IV_UPDATE_TASK_LOCAL       = FALSE
*   IV_SAVE_FRAME_LOG          = FALSE
*   IV_NO_BDOC_SEND            = FALSE
*   IT_ACTIVE_SWITCH           =
IMPORTING
   ET_SAVED_OBJECTS           = SAVED
   ET_EXCEPTION               = EXCEPT
   ET_OBJECTS_NOT_SAVED       = UNSAVED
* CHANGING
*   CV_LOG_HANDLE              =
* EXCEPTIONS
*   DOCUMENT_NOT_SAVED         = 1
*   OTHERS                     = 2
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.

Hi,,
To be able to call a function module in an update work process, you must flag it in the Function Builder. When you create the function module, set the Process Type attribute to Update with immediate start
Alternatively u can use this function module.
CRM_STATUS_DATA_SAVE_DB
BAPI_CUSTOMERCRM_CHANGE (If u wish to use a bapi for this).
Also , Let me know what error you got when implementing other function module.Does the function module didnt return any error but still the value is not changed for pricing condition type?

In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

Hi
In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code should not be FF because tax code FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
Please help me.
Rajendra Prasad

Dear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

New Tax code Creation for CST(Condition type

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue during creation of new Tax-code for CST; condition type JIN1. After defining the tax percentage; system is picking an automatic G/L account, which is a grey field and can't be editable. We need to change G/L account and need to assign a new one.
Can you please tell us how can we remove the default assigned and non-editable G/L account.
Your support is appreciable.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja.

Hi Krishnan,
Use transaction OB40, here double click on the Account Key (you can check this account key assigned to condition type in OBQ3 and also in FTXP screen) that is mapped to condition type JIN1 and enter your chart of accounts. Now change the G/L account you want.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

ME21N : Donu2019t copy the price for all condition types from last po

Dear.
When I create a purchase order the price for all condition types are copied from last purchase order inside the info-record.
But I have some condition types like FRA1 or FRA2 that I donu2019t want that system transfer price from last purchase order.
How can I do that ?
Thanks.

Hi Cris,
Go to SPRO>MM>PUR>Info Record>Define Price History> Here with your Purchasing organization if the tick is active that
Specifies that the order price history (PO price history) is to be updated with the effective price.
Normally, the order price history is updated with the net price.
Procedure
Set this indicator if you want the order price history to be updated with the effective price.
Thanks
Diwakar

Condition Records For Tax Condition types for SAP 4.7

Dear Experts,
What is the procedure to maintain condition records for tax condition types like CST , VAT and Service Tax. We are not using CIN. In MM01 and XD02 tax classifications i have maintained UTXJ condition Type and also maintained the above mention tax condition types.. But when i create condition records for UTXJ in VK11 the sysytem is asking for Tax code. In FTXP when i defined Tax code A1 for Tax ProcedureTAXIN1 where i maintained all the Tax condition types there.But i am unable to save the Tax % in FTXP.When i try to save the tax code it is not saving.
Is there any other procedure to maintain Tax condition types for SAP4.7.
My Pricing procedure that i maintained in V/08 is Z00001.
Regards
Jyoti

Hi Jyoti
Since you are not using CIN, you can do the follwing for tax conditions
Check the assignment of the TAx procedure to country
once u do this , you will be able to maintin the vendor and customer records for MWST type for taxes
then create condition records for MWSt with access sequence MWST in condiution type or design one suited to your needs
alternatevely in the current procedure you can change access sequence for condition type UTXJ form the current one to MWST and then maintain condition records
hope this helps
thanks
Akasha

Authorization object for manual condition type in sale order

Hi experts
I want ask them, If exist an authorization object for manual Condition type (KOMV-KSCHL) in the sales order (VA01/VA02), that the user don' t can create neither modify the sale orden with a specific manual condition type (payment term) by stardard way.
Best regards
John Angulo

HI John,
I would be surprised to know that someone uses the Payment terms as a condition in the Pricing procedure for sales orders. The payment terms define when the customer agrees to pay, (15, 20, 45 ,....days or 5 years or 10 years....whatever it be)
this detail for what i know is in the sales order header,and ideally has nothing to do with the Item level material price conditions.
its ok, If you mean something else by payment terms.....in principle you can have a conditon type restrcited such that manual entries on the condition are not possible. this cane be done in SPRO customizing, i am sure your functional consultants would know what to do (SPRO->Sales and Distribution->Basic Function->Condition Types), in the tab "Changes that can be made" have a value that says manual Processing is not allwowed
The ABAP route mentioned above is for a different scenarion and i dont think it is necessary for your requirement

How can we create new pricing requirement for a condition type

Hi All,
I am in urgent need of creating new pricing requirements for a condition type.
Or if there is already a conditin type existing and we want to make changes in the pricing requirements of that condition type, How can we do so ?
In short if you can let me know how does pricing get impacted by the condition types.
Thanks
Mark

Hi!
The common transactions for condition mantaining are VK11, VK12, VK13.
In SPRO - Sales and distributoin - Basic function - Pricing - Pricing control - *.
Is this what you want?
Regards
Tamá

Issue regarding condition pricing date as system date for some condition types in sales order

Hi
I have already created a sales order on 30.04.2014. Today I am adding new line item to sales order in VA02 transaction. in this order new line items condition pricing date for conditions JEX2,JECX should show as 12.06.2014. But currently it is showing as 30.04.2014. I need condition pricing date as system date for above conditions.
Regards
prashant

Hi
When I am changing pricing date VBKD-PRSDT in sales order header . It is changing the condition pricing date for all. Sales order is created on 04.06.2014. I have added line item 150 on 14.06.2014.
After adding line item 150 , there I have changed the pricing date as 14.06.2014. in sales A tab of item 150. But still it is taking from Sales order header date as 04.06.2014 for all conditions. But my requirement is for line item it should take as system date for some conditions like JEX2,JECX& JA1Y but for other conditions it will take as Order creation date. Please suggest. I have also attached screen shot below. please go through it.
Regards
PK
Sales order header change mode VA02
Here pricing date VBKD-PRSDT = 04.06.2016
Item change mode
I have added new line item 150 on 14.06.2014
Changed the condition pricing date to 14.06.2014 & saved
After saving I have gone to Va02 screen of line item 150
& there I have gone to condition pricing date field from item condition tab
for JEX2 condition type but still here condition pricing date is showing as
04.06.2014 as below.
Condition pricing date
My requirement is like this
For some particular conditions like JEX2 condition pricing date will take as system
date instead sales order creation date when I will add a new item 150 on
14.06.2014.but for other conditions it will show as order creation date for the
same line item 150 .

Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
Dharmveer

Hi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer

Function Module for getting the Sales Price for a condition type

Hi,
I am looking for a standard function module to which I can pass my condition type(new customizing) and it will return the sales price. The customer is going to create some new condition type to manitain the sales price. I'll have the necessary information like material/sales org/distribution channel, customer and need the standard function module to read the condition records for that condition type(as configured) and give me the price. PLease help if you know of a standard function module performing this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Malthi

Hi malthi ,
welcome to sdn
for material sales area u can look for the validations is table MVKE.
the classification of the conditions is in tables like A901, a902 etc which in my opinion holds the condition types per classification .
put a A* in se11 and this will give the list of tables per classification .
u need to get the conditions as per kschl and dmbtr and
etc..
like this ..
Get Condition Values for Material/Plant combination
IF NOT i_a916[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT knumh kappl kschl krech
           kbetr konwa kpein kmein
           INTO TABLE i_konp
           FROM konp
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a916
           WHERE knumh EQ i_a916-knumh AND
                 kappl EQ i_a916-kappl AND
                 kschl EQ i_a916-kschl AND
                 loevm_ko NE 'X'.
ENDIF.
Get Condition Values for Material/Plant/Ordertype/
Customer combination
IF NOT i_a925[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT knumh kappl kschl krech
           kbetr konwa kpein kmein
           APPENDING TABLE i_konp
           FROM konp
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a925
           WHERE knumh EQ i_a925-knumh AND
                 kappl EQ i_a925-kappl AND
                 kschl EQ i_a925-kschl AND
                 loevm_ko NE 'X'.
ENDIF.
just check this Fm if u can apply ur condition over here ..
ME_GET_PRICE_CONDITION
regards,
VIjay.

How to maintain change history for a custom field

Hi All,
I have added a new custom field in standard table FKKVKP by appending a new structure to FKKVKP. Now this custom field will appear in transaction CAA2. My requirement is I have to maintain change history for my custom field. In transaction SCDO I have seen that there is an object MKK_VKONT that maintains change history for FKKVKP entries. But I am not aware how to adjust this field so that SAP generates change history for my custom field as well.
Thanks in advance,
Venkat

Venkatesh,
DFKKTAXEX
FKKVK
FKKVKP
FKKVK_CORR
I have never used these tables but I have working experience with change docs.
The Z field which you have added should be in the above structures, then you should be able to see that field in the changes.
Of course change document should be set to that field-data element.

Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hide values for certain condition types in Quotation Saleorder and Invoice

Hi All,
I have written code to hide values for certain condition types in LV69AFZZ,
this works fine in the ITEM LEVEL.
But for the same condition types, I could not hide the values in the HEADER LEVEL.
Unless I hide it at header level also, this is useless.
Please guide me how to do it.
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep

Hi,
We have been using FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION of LV69AFZz for item level & FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFIC_KOPF of LV69AFZZ for hiding heade level conditions.
I hope this helps,
Regards
Raju chiutale.

Change history (for perticular condition type) in scheduling agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for