CIN scenario

Hello, I want to MAP below scenario. Is it possible and what are the possible way to MAP using CIN
Scn1) The Indian company(TH) places an order to the Vendor for Raw material with an instruction to directly supply the goods to a sub supplier. In such a case the Vendor will raise an invoice in favour of TH a/c sub supplier or a/c customer inclusive of excise duty etc.
The sub supplier is instructed to send the material to the customer site.
In such a case there is only exchange of documents (E1 Transaction). The materials are not delivered at TH. TH passes on the excise credit to the customer. No registers are updated by TH. The excise duty paid to the vendor is passed on in the customer invoice.
Scn2) There is also a case where TH places an order for Raw material to a dealer who in turn places the order to a principle vendor (E2 transaction). Raw materials to be delivered to the customer site. In such a case too since there is no movement of goods with TH, TH cannot claim CENVAT and it passes on the duty paid to the Customer in the customer sales invoice.
How to map these two scenarios

Similar Messages

FREE GOODS IN CIN Scenario

Hi.
Friends,
I am doing Free goods Scenario. In this i am not charging any thing to customer.
But company has to pay excise duty on that so what accounting entry should be pass on to accounting at tha time of invoicing &how to configure it. pls send the solution immidiately.
thanks & regards
rikhab

Hi rikhab,
1.define free of charge sales document
2.define new pricing procedure for free of charge as per your requirement
and in that procedure select statistical check box for price condition type
3.determine your pricing procedure for your document customer and sales area
try this
regards
bvdv

Sub contracting CIN scenario

Scenario 1
I have 2 plants.One manufacturing plant & another is import & local sales plant.No manufacturing activity in 2nd plant.I am
creating 2nd plant as vendor & supplying subcontracting materials to the plant from plant 1 with a PO.I am generating 57f challan
also for the material issued.A 3rd party vendor is doing repair in the plant 2 (vendor) & the material is is received in plant 1 again &
challan is reconciled.Then it is sold to customer.Is this cycle correct?
Scenario 2-The only change in this is, i create a PO as free goods & generate 57f & all other are same.But when i reconcile
the 57F the system prompts to reverse challan or do not reverse?Why is the difference is this of Free goods PO.
Which cycle has to be followed in scenario the first or second?

Hi,
First scenario will be the right procedure as of my knowledge. You may test the scenario and validate the excise postings.
Regards,
AKPT

Return material to vendor-CIN scenario

Hi gurus,
1.Can i know the steps for returning the material to vendor after doing MIRO.-CIN involved
2.Returning the material to vendor after paying the vendor-CIN involved.
regards
murugan

Hello Murugan,
Awnser for 1) see as u wabt to return the material to vendor , so as u had already made a GR & posted J1iex , so first of all cancell the GRN document , then Cancell the J1iex , , Now make a return P.O for htis there is acondition that the material u want to return to vendor should lie in unrestricted stock , now as ur Return P.o is made , release it & then do GR with respect to this Returm P.O with mvmt. type = 161, as these material is being return to vendor then the outgoing tax invoice should also be prepared so to do this use T.code -> J1IS here use ref. docu type as MATD, Give GR NO, series group , here all excise duties are to be filled manually & save the invoice note down the no. of invoice, After this U have to post the invoice through -->J1IV , Now to take print out of this outgoing tax invoice u have to make a customised t.code as we have made it was --> ZRETURN here u can have print out of this invoice .
Now for 2nd Question ---> post credit memo to vendorby t.code ---> MIRO if already paid .
Pl reward for efforts , i had already gone through this case .
sap11

CIN- E1 purchase

Hi All,
please help in understanding and configuring E1 purchase process in indian cin scenario.
thanks and regards
Ajay

dear Raghu,
I simulated this scenario , i feel the result are not ok.
I raised the PO to B ( trader) for V- belt of Rs 100. It attracts the LST of 2.5 % and 1% other tax.
I made the tax code T1 with 2.5 % LST and 1% other taxes. Therefore the value is 3.50 rupees.
Therefore my PO is of value Rs 103.50.
I did the same what you proposed.
MIGO entries:
I entered PO and on excise TAB I entered RS 16 as BED, Rs 0.32 Edu cess and Rs 0.16 as Secondary Edu cess. The following details are of accounting document posted.
Stock account= Rs 87.76 +
GR/IR= Rs 87.76
Purchase stores account= Rs 87.76 +
Purchase offset account = Rs 87.76
MIRO Entries:
Vendor B = Rs 120.06
GR/IR= 87.76 +
Stock account = Rs 16.30 +
Purchase store account= Rs 16.30 +
Purchase offset account = RS 16.30-
Cenvat input BED = RS 16
Question?
1) why the vendor account ( vendor B) is getting credited by Rs 120.06, it should be Rs 103.50 or what should be the right figure?
2) at the time of migo stock account is getting debited by 87.76 rupees.
3) Since the excise invoice is from Vendor A not from Vendor B, where will I capture VENDOR A information in MIGO.
Please simulate the scenario if possible,
We have purchase account management active, you can ignore these.
thanks and regards

Difference in the excise invoice and Billing document value

HI Experts,
I am working in a Excise based CIN scenario.
I am Abaper and wanted to solve an issue.
basically, We are creating billing document and then creating an excise invoice. but there is a diff between the excise invoice and billing value.
Any input will really help thanks...

hi Lakshmipathi,
Sorry for the delay in replying.
This particular scenario happened to only some invoices which were generated in a day.
After that particular day, this didnt happen but would like to know why it has happened since we didnt want the same to happen again in future.
it is not the billing value. its it billing duty applied on the value.
Please help.

End to End Excise duty process ..?

Hi all
Can anybody explain me the step to be carried out after below steps in excise duty proces (CIN process ).
1.Created PO with Excisable material,-ME21N
2.GR done for excise material PO -MIGO
3.Capture and post Excise invoice -J1IEX
4.Now i have checked in J2I9, its showing opening balance-X amount and closing balance as X amount. Credit availed for this month is Y amount.
How to proceed further to complete end to end excise transaction .
5.How to utilise the amount....?
6.How to pay the duty payable to CENVAT office .
Explain step byt step to complete entire Excise duty scenarion (CIN scenario).
Thanks
Sap-mm

Duplicate Post of: /thread/1550764 [original link is broken]

Stock Transport Order Setup

Hi
I have to setup Stock transport order between plants in same company code through inventory route (by 351 movement). Kindly guide me for the
1.Standard customizing and master data setup required for the same.
2. Any additional Customizing & Master data setup required for the same in the Cin Scenario.(i.e. customer/ vendor relation etc.)
Regards
Arvind

Hi,
If you are doing STO through 351 mvt in MIGO , PLease follow the below steps:
Steps:
-Create a Stock Transport Order (ME21N, Purchase Order doc type UB)
-Process Goods Issue against STO (MIGO > Goods Issue > PO) u2013 movement type 351
-Process Goods Receipt against STO (MIGO > Goods Receipt > PO) u2013 movement type 101
Customisation:
1. Config: MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up Stock Transport Order > Assign Document Type, One-Step Procedure, Underdelivery Tolerance.
Here the source plant, destination plant and allowed STO document type is specified.
2. MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up Stock Transport Order >define shipping data for plant. Here create receiving plant as a customer and assign.
Regards
Ram

Exc. tax ind. not maint. for 1 1 - please maintain-Message

Hi
While creating Sale order , I am getting following message
what could be the reason, IN some cases only i am getting this message in CIN Scenario.We are using TAXINJ.and version is ECC6.00
Exc. tax ind. not maint. for 1 1 - please maintain
Message no. 8I004
Diagnosis
The excise tax indicator is not maintained for the specific combination. The indicator is needed to determine the excise duty rate.
Procedure
Cancel the document.
Maintain the combination with the final indicator in the table.
thanks
Bijaya Pradhan

Dear Antima
As I said earlier, go to SM30, give the table J_1IEXESTA and select "Maintain". Now it will take you to a screen, wherein, you have to maintain as under:-
Indicator for co::::::::indicator for cust::::::::Excise tax indicator
                             1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1
                             1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2
                             1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3
                             2:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1
                             2:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2
                             2:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3
                             3:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1
                             3:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::2
                             3:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3
For information, 1 is nothing but 100% tax, 2 is 50% and 3 is nil duty.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

MWST-group condition rounding difference between invoice and credit memo

Hi Experts,
I have an issue with MWST rounding issue.
Before jumping into the actual problem these are the prerequisites
SAP Version: ECC6.0
Condition type: MWST, with group condition tick enabled!
US Scenario (No Implication of CIN)
Scenario: - From Billing document  to Credit memo invoice.
When a invoice is referenced to the credit memo, there is a difference in the rounding value.
E.g.: Invoice tax value: 387.34 when completely referenced to credit memo become;s 387.31.
Please throw some light on it!

Hi,
Check Note 315792 - Group conditions of the same amount on item and related notes.
Perhaps Note 80183 - Rounding will help you too.
Regards,
Eduardo

CIN-Two Export scenarios-Duty not paid & Duty Paid

Hello SAP SD CINers,
I have a basic requirement which is that one industry exports without duty paid (which is always the case) and other duty paid which means in the Billing document & the Export Excise Invoice the Price will be statistical but the Taxes like JEXP (IN: A/R BED %) will be accounted for.
The solution as formulated by us is that we have a new series created and then all seems right but the problem here is that it is very very difficult to get a new series from Customs for different busines scenario as normally only two are sanctioned like Home consumption and for Exports.A new Shipping Point be created specially for this scenario which can then be maintained in the Excise/Series group determination but the problem here is that one needs a new Series Group to be maintained which should have utilization not clicked as normally for exports it is ticked off for no utilization but here we need to carry out utilization.Hence, the requirement for a new Series is generated.This is very difficult to convince the Authorities to sanction a new series grouop as this is normally not done.
Could you CIN masters suggest something for this.
In Std SAP, we can have two order types for e.g. OR & RE to have the same No. range int. assignment which will cause the number maintained to find the next available number for both OR as well as RE..OR can have number "1" and RE can have number "2" & so on and so forth.Duplications dont happen here but in case of CIN Excise Invoices, this happens if we shift between Series "EX" (for export) & new Series say "S1" both of which have Object " J_1IEXCEXP" have same from -to numbers.
This problem can be easily be solved by making the changes in the source code which allows this two series groups to have the same number range and the numbers shouldn't get duplicated and the sytem should take in next available number just as this is done for Sales Orders.But that is a change, so we would request for some solution within the existing setup.
I am sure this problem must arise with almost all Indian export factories so there must be some workaround for this problem.
Kindly advice as this is very challenging scenario.In case of further queries, kindly send query for this & i will be looking forward to valuable inputs from you all regarding this.
Thanks All in advance.
Regards,
Dinesh Relwani.

Hello SAP SD CINers,
I have a basic requirement which is that one industry exports without duty paid (which is always the case) and other duty paid which means in the Billing document & the Export Excise Invoice the Price will be statistical but the Taxes like JEXP (IN: A/R BED %) will be accounted for.
The solution as formulated by us is that we have a new series created and then all seems right but the problem here is that it is very very difficult to get a new series from Customs for different busines scenario as normally only two are sanctioned like Home consumption and for Exports.A new Shipping Point be created specially for this scenario which can then be maintained in the Excise/Series group determination but the problem here is that one needs a new Series Group to be maintained which should have utilization not clicked as normally for exports it is ticked off for no utilization but here we need to carry out utilization.Hence, the requirement for a new Series is generated.This is very difficult to convince the Authorities to sanction a new series grouop as this is normally not done.
Could you CIN masters suggest something for this.
In Std SAP, we can have two order types for e.g. OR & RE to have the same No. range int. assignment which will cause the number maintained to find the next available number for both OR as well as RE..OR can have number "1" and RE can have number "2" & so on and so forth.Duplications dont happen here but in case of CIN Excise Invoices, this happens if we shift between Series "EX" (for export) & new Series say "S1" both of which have Object " J_1IEXCEXP" have same from -to numbers.
This problem can be easily be solved by making the changes in the source code which allows this two series groups to have the same number range and the numbers shouldn't get duplicated and the sytem should take in next available number just as this is done for Sales Orders.But that is a change, so we would request for some solution within the existing setup.
I am sure this problem must arise with almost all Indian export factories so there must be some workaround for this problem.
Kindly advice as this is very challenging scenario.In case of further queries, kindly send query for this & i will be looking forward to valuable inputs from you all regarding this.
Thanks All in advance.
Regards,
Dinesh Relwani.

What are the scenarios in SAP CIN?

Hi,
I need to work on CIN.
Can you give the total scenarios on CIN on MM and SD side.
Sateesh

Hello,
Before I am going to explain what cenvat is, you have to understand the Indian tax central excise duty(BED). It is called as basis excise duty. Every manufacturer is liable to pay the excise duty in various kinds like Basis excise duty, Special excise duty, Additional excise duty etc.,
Just think over a product which is reached to an end user, how many manufacturing activities are done. So to reduce the tax burden of the end user the Govt of India has introduced the MODVAT scheme which is now called CENVAT scheme. Based on this, if any manufacturer purchased a material, which is duty paid and if it is used for his further manufacturing activity, he can avail this as credit in his book based on the central excise invoice. At the time of selling his manufactured goods, he is liable to pay the excise duty. He can adjust the credit which he has taken into his books and pay the rest.
Ex: Cenvat availed at the time of purchased various goods Rs.20,000 (excise duty) and Cenvat payable for his product at the time of sales Rs.25,000(excise duty) he will pay only Rs.5,000 through cash deposit in PLA.
A/P Module (During Purchases):
Purchase of Inventory Raw Material (100 KGs@10)     : 1,000/-
Add: Tax on Purchases (VAT or CST)           :    100/- (10% on 1,000)
                                          Total            1,100/-
Add: Excise Duty u2013 10% on 1100                110/-
Total amount payble to Vendor                  1,210/-
                         ======
NOTE : If we purchases raw material with in the state then we need to pay VAT. If we purchase raw material from other state then we need to pay CST.
1) Purchase Order u2013 ME21N : No accounting entry will be generated
2) Goods Receipt u2013 MIGO:
Inventory Raw Material A/c Dr 1,000/-
To GR/IR Clearing A/c 1,000/-
Note-1: RG23A Part-I needs to be updated in TC:J1IEX_C. Here, 100 kgs needs to be updated in this register.
Note-2: RG23A Part-II needs to be updated in TC: J1IEX_P. Here, 1,000/- value needs to be updated in this Register. The following entries will be generated.
Cenvat Reveivable A/c Dr 110/-
To Cenvat Clearing A/c 110/-
3) Invoice Varification u2013 MIRO:
GR/IR Clearing A/c Dr 1,000/-
To Cenvat Clearing A/c Dr 110/-
To VAT/CST Recivable A/c Dr 100/-
To Vendor A/c 1,210/-
A/R Module (During Sales):
Sale of Finished Product (200 KGs@10)          : 2,000
Add: Tax on Sales (VAT or CST)                           200 (10% on 2,000)
Total                           2,200/-
Add: Excise Duty                          220/- (10% on 2,200)
Total Amount Recivable from Customer             2,420/-
                                                                                =======
Note: VAT needs to be received from the customer when we sold finished product with in the state. CST needs to be received from the customer when we sold finished product in other state.
1) Sales Order: No accounting entry will be generated
2) Delivery:
Cost of Goods Sold A/c Dr
To Finished Product A/c
3) Billing:
Customer A/c Dr 2,420/-
To Sales A/c 2,000/-
To CST/VAT Payable A/c 200/-
To Cenvat Suspense A/c 220/-
4) Transfer of Cenvat suspense to cenvat payable A/c:
Cenvat Suspense A/c Dr 220/-
To Cenvat Payable A/c 220/-
5) Deposit of amount in PLA (Personel Ledger Account):
P L A A/c Dr 1,00,000/-
To ICICI Bank A/c 1,00,000/-
6) To avail cenvat credit (from purchases) and remaining amount should be deducted from PLA Deposit:
Cenvat Payable A/c Dr 220/-
To Cenvat Receivable A/c 110/-
To PLA A/c 110/-
7) VAT/CST Payable to Govt:
VAT/CST Payable A/c Dr 200/-
To VAT/CST Recivable A/c 100/-
To ICICI Bank A/c 100/-
Go through the some of following registers:
1) RG23A Part-I     : To update the quantitiy of consumable goods
2) RG23A Part-II     : To update the value of consumable goods
3) RG23C Part-I     : To update the quantity of capital goods
4) RG23C Part-II     : To update the value of capitial goods
Thanks
Para

CIN - J1IG - Import Scenario

Hi,
My client having Trading Registration.They purchase import raw material and selling the same to customer.So i have to capture excise invoice in J1IG after GRN.Here , in import scenario i mentioned zero tax code and maintained all standard tax conditon like J1CV , JADC etc.. in pricing procedure.Also maintained these conditons in Excise defualts CIN Configuration.After MIRO with customs invoice , i put GRN.When i tried for J1IG w.r.t Mat Document, system didnt pick up the excise value.
Kinldy tell me any IMG setting has to done or have to manually enter all excise duties for import scenario.
Thanks and Regards
Sumathi.S

Hi
check following link
[Depot Import purchase Scenario;
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPMan/DepotActivities-+CIN]
[Taxes not getting copied in J1IG transaction;
Regards
Kailas ugale

Import scenario - CIN

Hallo,
We are implementing SAP CIN and we have import scenario. However we are not using PO for imports, but we use only scheduling agreement for imports. So, is it possible for paying cutoms and other duties thorugh MIRO (planned delivery cost) like in PO scenario. Is this scenario through Scheduling agreement is supported in CIN for converting CVD and other duties as excise. please advise.
Thanks.

Use PO instead of Scheduling agreement. reason is, there are lots of delivery costs in case of Imports say customs duty, warehouse charges, transportation charges. Once PO history gets updated, you can't make any changes in that PO for delivery costs. And you need to change this in imports frequently. For PO, you can create new PO in such case. But for scheduling agreement, it will be a lot of headache for the user.
Think these aspects before going for SA.

SSI (Small Scale Industry) Scenario in CIN

Dear Experts,
We are using TAXINN - Condition based Tax Procedure for CIN (4.7 R/3 Enterprises). Can any one please share with me, how to handle the SSI scenario in TAXINN. I am looking for feasible solution other than modifying the condition records each time.
Thanks in Advance.
Babu.

Hi
As far as SSIs are concerned, there are two schemes. Under the first, an SSI can opt out of the CENVAT scheme. In this case, they apply basic excise duty at certain flat rates on all transactions. These rates vary according to their total annual sales.
Prerequisites :
define a separate SSI status for each of the various "slabs" .
Assigned the vendor the SSI status that you have just defined

CIN scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for