CISCO876 multiple atm connections problem

I am having BIG problem! We are testing hub & spoke configuration
CISCO876>>ALCATEL DSL SYSTEM<<CISCO876
HUB SPOKE
2 vlans 2 vlans
One VLan should be used for VIDEO traffic and another for VPN! Current
configuration is behaving very unstable, links are going down every 5
min and connection between HUB and SPOKE is not WROKING unfortunaly?! :
Can some give me clue what to do next?
Here is the configs:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1592 bytes
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname BUNDLE
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable password pass
no aaa new-model
resource policy
ip cef
interface BRI0
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
shutdown
interface ATM0
no ip address
atm ilmi-keepalive 5 retry 5
dsl operating-mode auto
hold-queue 224 in
interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
description Subinterface for ViSS
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
ip virtual-reassembly
no snmp trap link-status
atm route-bridged ip
pvc 1/32
interface ATM0.2 point-to-point
description Subinterface for LSVPN
ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.252
ip virtual-reassembly
no snmp trap link-status
atm route-bridged ip
pvc 0/35
interface FastEthernet0
interface FastEthernet1
interface FastEthernet2
description ViSS port
switchport access vlan 10
interface FastEthernet3
description LSVPN port
switchport access vlan 20
interface Vlan1
no ip address
interface Vlan10
description LAN for ViSS
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan20
description LAN for LSVPN
ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.0
ip route 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 ATM0.1
ip route 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0 ATM0.2
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
control-plane
line con 0
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password pass
login
scheduler max-task-time 5000
webvpn context Default_context
ssl authenticate verify all
no inservice
end
HUB CONF :
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1592 bytes
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname BUNDLE
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable password pass
no aaa new-model
resource policy
ip cef
interface BRI0
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
shutdown
interface ATM0
no ip address
atm ilmi-keepalive 5 retry 5
dsl operating-mode auto
hold-queue 224 in
interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
description Subinterface for ViSS
ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.252
ip virtual-reassembly
no snmp trap link-status
atm route-bridged ip
pvc 1/32
interface ATM0.2 point-to-point
description Subinterface for LSVPN
ip address 192.168.4.2 255.255.255.252
ip virtual-reassembly
no snmp trap link-status
atm route-bridged ip
pvc 0/35
interface FastEthernet0
interface FastEthernet1
interface FastEthernet2
description ViSS port
switchport access vlan 10
interface FastEthernet3
description LSVPN port
switchport access vlan 20
interface Vlan1
no ip address
interface Vlan10
description LAN for ViSS
ip address 10.10.3.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan20
description LAN for LSVPN
ip address 10.10.4.1 255.255.255.0
ip route 10.10.3.0 255.255.255.0 ATM0.1
ip route 10.10.4.0 255.255.255.0 ATM0.2
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
control-plane
line con 0
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password pass
login
scheduler max-task-time 5000
webvpn context Default_context
ssl authenticate verify all
no inservice
end
Waiting for replys!

I am not getting error. I've debugged atm events,ilmi I've not seen any errors. Subinterfaces atm0.1 and atm0.2 are UP UP but one of pings(LSVPN) hub>spoke to the other side is request time out.On the other side spoke>hub same ping(LSVPN) is giving request time out.

Similar Messages

  • SAPConsole710 - multiple profiles connectivity problem

    Hi,
    We have installed SAPConsole 710 and telnet server in same box. We have created profiles for DEV and QAS system. When I set default to DEV, then i am able to connect only DEV system.
    If i remove set as default option i am unable to connect any of the SAP system. Please help me to resolve the problem.
    Regards,
    Suraj

    ACEs in access-list 111 are not in the correct order. ACEs in ACLs are processed top down. You are hitting the permit before the deny for 192.168.50.x, therefore the traffic is attempting to be routed out the NAT for the Internet connection, not through the IPSEC tunnel. Move the permit statement last after the 3 deny statements.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Problem about financial reporting studio(assign multiple db connection)

    Hi,
    I need to assign multiple database connections to a grid in Oracle Hyperion Financial Reporting Studio
    To do this, I performed the following steps:
    - Open a report.
    - In a grid, select one column for which I want to change the database connection.
    - In the Column Properties sheet, click the Select Database Connection button, .
    - In the Select a Database Connection dialog box, select a database connection from the Database Connection drop-down list, then Click OK.
    - In the Map Dimensions Between... dialog box, map dimensions between the default database connection and the selected database connection. I do this by selecting a dimension from the pull-down list in the right column for each dimension in the left column.
    - Optional: Select an alias table for the new database connection.
    - Click OK.
    But after last step I have received next error:
    *; nested exception is:*
    java.lang.NullPointerException
    Can someone explain the source of this error?
    And help me please solve this problem because I didn’t receive figures in that column where I changed database connection.
    Thank you in advance!

    I'm sure that both DB connections has the same dimension hierarchy. I can open the repot, but in it I don't see figures in that column where I've changed database connection...

  • Connectivity problems on ATM MPLS network

    We have implemented a country wide MPLS network based on 8500 platforms. We have encountered some strange connectivity problems between some PE's. Without apparent reason connectivity is lost between some PEs and restored after some time. The global routing table is perfectly stable among all the routers on the path between respective PE's. Also the LVC's & TAGs are stable and practically we were unable to find any change between the working and not working state. As a curious thing, during the outage (minutes) clearing routes into a PE VRF was restoring connectivity on the respective VRF and all other VRFs on the respective PE also!
    Has enyone seeing similar problems before?
    PE routers are 3660 series and we've tried all IOS available on CCO.

    Have you made any provisioning (upgrading connectivity) bet the PEs and Ps....I suffer such a similar problem with our network PEs and I notice that this happen after provisioning links between our PEs (RPMs in MGX 8850) and the ATM LSR (BPX 8600).
    when i issue "clear ip route vrf *" or reload the RPM.....all the VRFs operate normally again.....so I get used to such a problem after any network provisioning process but still i couldn't relate this to problems with VRFs.

  • Our home network has multiple devices connected by iCloud. Having problem with Calendar. On one iMac, all the events are duplicated. How can I correct that problem? Under the Calendar accounts, I had my Apple id listed and also just iCloud.

    Our home network has multiple devices connected by iCloud: 2 iMacs, 2 iPhone 4s, 1 MacPro Laptop, and 1 iPad 2.  When using Calendar, all the events were
    duplicated on my husbands iMac.  On his computer, under Calendar accounts, I had included iCloud and also my iCloud ID.  I thought that because I had two accounts listed that were connected to iCloud, that might be the cause of the duplication.  When I deleted ithe calendars from one of the accounts, it resulted
    in deleting all of the events on all of our network devices!
    I have since entered some new events into Calendar from my iMac and from my iPhone.  These appear correctly on all devices except my husband's iMac where they are again all duplicated.
    I have two questions: 1)  How can I eliminate the duplicated events on my husband's computer and 2) How do I retrieve the old wiped out Calendar events from
    Time Capsule.  I don't know how to find Calendar in the Time Capsule.  If I find the Calendar information in Time Capsule, how do I transfer it to my current Calendars?
    I was obtaining phone help from one of the Apple techs at Apple Support, but our call was disconnected part way through.  Didn't know how to reconnect with the tech.
    Thanks for any help.

    The warranty entitles you to complimentary phone support for the first 90 days of ownership.

  • RFC Receiver adpater Connection problem , Help us to solve ?

    Hi  Friends ,
                          Our scenarilo is Mail to RFC. It was running fine. In RFC Receiver adapter i have given <b>Maximium connection property to 1</b> .
                      While multiple set data passed to rfc will connection problem will come ?
                     Most data not uploaded . I am getting the following error.
                     <b>   If i set max connection to 5 . It is 5 times or more than that it is pusing the data .</b>
                    i am getting the following error <b>while i set the Max   connection to 1 .</b> . <b>Any other place i need to change configuration ?</b>
                   <i><b> - Error: 2007-09-24 10:51:22 GMT-05:30: Message processed for interface YRFC_EXT_WARR: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: resource error: could not get a client from JCO.Pool: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (106) JCO_ERROR_RESOURCE: Connection pool RfcClient[CC_EXTE_WAREN_2W_RFC_RECEIVER]e7fa21f86ec535e883636c0beffc0f0c is exhausted. The current pool size limit (max connections) is 1 connections.</b></i>
                            Please give the description . I have referred many likns . Help us to solve this problem .
    Regards.,
    V.Rangarajan<b></b>
    Message was edited by:
            ranga rajan

    Hi,
    Have a look at this.This will help you.
    1.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f3f93ee7-0c01-0010-2593-d7c28b5377c2
    2. https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3103eb90-0201-0010-71af-be6f4a6f61d1
    Regards,
    Akshay Jamgaonkar.
    Reward points if find useful.
    Message was edited by:
            Akshay Jamgaonkar

  • Multiple Samsung Stratosphere problems after FF1 update

    There have been multiple posts on various issues users have found after the recent Stratopshere FF1 update.  Some were replys to older posts and some only touched on a single issue.  I wanted to consolodate into one thread, and hopefully get teh attention of Verizon to maybe reply here.
    For reference, a lot has been discuss here --> https://community.verizonwireless.com/message/874446
    Summary:  Verizon and Samsung have finally updated the Stratosphere almost 1 year after release.  This updated the phone from Android 2.3.5 to Android 2.3.6.  Going by filename, this is known as the FF1 update.   This update went live at the end of August 2012, and most users were upgraded before mid September 2012.
    There were some noticable changes in this update:
    -Lock screen has changed.  The puzzle piece and glass lock options have been removed.  New options have been added, such as facial recognition unlock.
    -Call answering screen has changed, introducing the option to ignore call with a message.
    -Camera now has digital zoom ability.
    -Ability to uninstall the 2 games the phone comes with (Need for Speed and Lets Golf)
    -Phone icon has changed ever so slightly
    -Wifi icon now included up and down arrows to indicate data is being sent or recieved
    -Wallpaper no longer "stretches" over multiple screens - ie, it no longer scrolls as you move from screen to screen
    -The visual voicemail app has been improved (I have personally not used this feature)
    -Callback number is now supported in text / picture messages
    -Android core OS updated from 2.3.5 to 2.3.6 (both versions are still Gingerbread)
    -Update to how the device deals with the end of scrolling.  It used to rubber-band bounce back, now it will just give a green bar and expand the bar as you scroll.  (I cannot fault Samsung for this change as this was at teh core of an Apple lawsuit and has been changed in newer versions of Android.)
    -(I am sure there are more.  please list any others you may have noticed)
    I have found some problems, and others have confirmed that this is (at least) somewhat widespread:
    -The biggest problem is with wifi connectivity.  Upon an initial connection to wifi, everything works great.  After somewhere between 15minutes and 2 hours, problems start happening.  Its as if the wifi keeps hanging or reconnecting.  Download speeds (tested with the SpeedTest.com app) slow to about one third of normal.  Apps like Facebook that require a constant connection will just time out.
    -It appears the signal strength for 3g and 4g connections is lower.  There are places where I used to get a 4g connection, and now I only get 3g.  Some palces I fall back to just 2g digital.
    Another minor issue i found was with text messages.  When you reply to a message, it no longer automatically focuses the text in the input box.  You have to first click into the box to start typing.  Not a huge deal, but one more step to take over and over.  Minor annoyence.
    At my house, I struggle to get a 3g or 4g signal.  I depend on wifi for my data connection.  So with the wifi connection problem introduced by teh FF1 update, my phone is somewhat useless to me now while at home.  Here are teh troubleshooting steps I have been through so far to attempt to fix the wifi problem:
    -Complete factory reset on my phone.  (did not help)
    -Pull battery and SIM card out of phone for 15 minutes.  (did not help)
    -Went to a Verizon store.  The guy at the store was helpful, and said he also had a Stratosphere and was getting the same wifi problems after the update.  He said all he could do was to send me out a replacement phone. I got the replacement phone, and it had the same problems.
    -I read in multiple palces that Android 2.3.6 has a bug within wifi and DHCP.  Apparently if you have a DHCP lease set to "forever", the phone will keep requesting a new address.  Setting the DHCP server on the router to something like 2 weeks, or using a static IP is supposed to solve this.  I have a NetGear N900 router, and I can not change teh DHCP lease time.  It appears, however, that my router is not sending out "forever" leases.  But just to make sure, I gave my phone a static IP.  (None of these steps made any difference).
    The only thing that temporarily fixes the problem is a reboot of the phone.  This will again give you anywhere from 15min to 2 hours of good wifi use before problems start happening.
    I have now had this update for over a week, and on 2 phones.  I still can't maintain a wifi connection for much longer than 15 minutes without problems starting up.
    I am asking Verizon or Samsung to at least confirm this issue if possible.  Maybe there are newer revs of the Stratopshere hardware that don't have this problem.  Or there is something unique about my (and apparently others) situation.  But it seems like Verizon's current stance is to offer a repalcement phone (as currently all Stratospheres are within their 1 year manufacture warranty as the phone has not been ouy for quite 1 year yet).
    I am asking for a workaround for this problem, or a true fix adressed by a new software update, or at least allow us to roll back to the original Andorid 2.3.5 software.
    I have had my original Stratosphere for almost a year with no wifi problems - then get the FF1 update and have had nothing but problems on 2 different phones.
    Thank you for your time.

    Thanks for starting a comprehensive thread on problems with this update. I want to add one more.
    I have Bluetooth in my car (a 2004 model), and previously the phone has connected to it practically instantly when I start the car. Since the update, I have never been able to connect the phone to the car by Bluetooth. Several times the phone has made a standard notification sound at the moment it should be connecting to Bluetooth, though no notification appears. I have no idea what that could mean.The car's Bluetooth shows up as paired in the list of devices in Settings > Wireless & networks > Bluetooth settings. I haven't seen this widely reported as an update issue, but perhaps some others have experienced it too.
    UPDATE: I finally did some testing, and found that the notification was to signal the extremely brief appearance of a dialog indicating that the car's Bluetooth was requesting a connection. Accepting that request let the phone connect with the car, and calls went to the car's sound system as they should. When I turned the car off and back on (just the electrical system; not wasting any gas on this!), the connection was established immediately, so apparently the acceptance only had to be done once. Nevertheless, it did have to be done, and the dialog notification disappears within seconds. I believe it would have been possible to go into Bluetooth settings and accept the connection request there if I missed the notification; but not seeing the notification, I might not know to do this.
    One further observation: When I turned the phone's Bluetooth off and back on after a connection had been established, leaving the car on the whole time, the two did not reconnect. I believe that may be different from before the update, but I'm not really sure.
    Message was updated by David Rensberger

  • How to provide access to multiple users connected to a Dumb switch? (multi-auth/multi-domain)

    Good morning everybody,
    I am writing on behalf of not being able to implement a desired outcome in our company network. In fact the situation is as follows:
    What I want to do is to be able to authenticate users (802.1x authentication) in our company radius server and authorize them access by having a dynamic VLAN assignment in a multi-user environment on one and the same port of a Cisco 2960 switch. So far, the authentication and authorization has been working completely smoothly (there are no problems with itself). The concept involves the configuration of both DATA and VOICE VLANs as I there is also phone authentication implemented. In order to simulate this environment I introduce a Dumb switch connected to my Cisco 2960 Catalyst.
    What I have successfully managed to get to work so far is this:
    1) On one switch port I have tried the “authentication host-mode multi-domain” and it worked perfectly for a PC behind a telephone, or with one PC connected to a the dumb switch + the telephone connected to another port of the dumb switch. Logically it is the same situation as there is a separation in two domains – DATA and VOICE. Bellow is an output from show authentication sessions for this scenario.
    Interface  MAC Address     Method   Domain   Status         Session ID          
    Fa0/23     0021.9b62.b79b  dot1x    DATA     Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
    Fa0/23     0015.655c.b912  dot1x    VOICE    Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
    2) On the other hand, when I try the same scenario with the “authentication host-mode multi-auth”, the switch still separates the traffic in two domains and is able to authenticate all users, AS LONG AS they are in the same VLAN.
    show authentication sessions:
    Interface  MAC Address     Method   Domain   Status         Session ID          
    Fa0/23     0021.9b62.b79b  dot1x    DATA     Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
    Fa0/23     b888.e3eb.ebac   dot1x    DATA     Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
    Fa0/23     0015.655c.b912  dot1x    VOICE    Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
    However, I cannot succeed authentication of many users from DIFFERENT VLANs, neither in multi-auth nor in multi-domain modes.
    What I want to get is an output like this:
    Interface  MAC Address     Method   Domain   Status         Session ID          
    Fa0/23     0021.9b62.b79b  dot1x    DATA     Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
    Fa0/23     b888.e3eb.ebac dot1x    DATA     Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
    Fa0/23     0015.655c.b912  dot1x    VOICE    Authz Success  C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
    I want the switch to authenticate the users anytime they connect to itself and for them to have an instant access to the network. (I tell this because I tried scenario 1) with multi-domain mode and authentication violation replace, and it worked but, two users never had access to the “Internet” simultaneously!!!
    The configuration of the interface connected to the Dumb switch is as follows.
    interface FastEthernet0/x                                                      
     description Connection to DUMBswitch                                            
     switchport mode access                                                         
     switchport voice vlan XXX                                                      
     switchport port-security maximum 10                                            
     switchport port-security                                                       
     switchport port-security violation protect                                     
     authentication host-mode multi-auth                                            
     authentication priority dot1x                                                  
     authentication port-control auto                                               
     authentication timer reauthenticate 4000                                       
     authentication violation replace                                               
     dot1x pae authenticator                                                        
     dot1x timeout tx-period 10                                                     
     spanning-tree portfast                                                         
    The way I see it is explained in the following steps:
    - PC1 connects to the Dumb switch. This causes the Cisco switch to authenticate user1. This creates an auth. session with its MAC address linked to a domain DATA.
    - When PC2 connects to the Dumb switch, this causes the violation replace which replaces the recent authenticated MAC address with the MAC of PC2. I would like it once authenticated to appear in the authentication sessions with a link to a new DATA domain linked to the VLAN assigned from the RADIUS server.
    Is this possible? I think (in theory) this is the only way to provide authenticated access to multiple users connecting through Dumb switch to the network.
    Has anybody ever succeeded in such a configuration example and if yes, I would be love to get some help in doing so?
    Thank you
    Stoimen Hristov

    Hi Stoimen,
    I have done a setup similar to yours with the only exception being VLAN assignment. When I used dACLs only, it makes things somewhat easier as the VLAN no longer matters. Remember that the switchport is in access mode and will only allow a single VLAN across it (with the exception of the voice VLAN). I think that is the real cause of your problem.
    From what I can see, you have 2 options available to you:
    1) Use dACLs instead of VLAN assignment. This means that an access list will be downloaded from the radius server straight to the authenticated user's session. I have tested this and it works perfectly. Just Google Cisco IBNS quick reference guide and look for the section that deals with Low Impact mode.
    2) Get rid of the dumb switches and use managed switches throughout your network. Dumb switches will always be a point of weakness in your network because they have no intelligence to do advanced security features like port security, 802.1x, DHCP snooping, etc.
    Hopefully someone else will chime in with another option.
    Xavier

  • IPOD CONNECTIVITY PROBLEM WITH WINDOWS XP VIA USB 2.0

    Enough is enough.
    I have an ipod touch and I am having difficulty connecting it to my pc via usb 2.0.
    I have searched the entire web and came across many cases similar or the same as mine. It's time for apple to face the fact that there is something wrong with either the apple mobile service or the apple usb drivers or the itunes software that causes connectivity problems with win xp.
    For the record my case is this:
    I got my itouch 3 days ago. I installed itunes 8.0. Then I plugged in my ipod to a usb extension cable port connected to a usb at the back of my desktop computer. At first I got the "this usb device can perform faster if you plug it to a usb 2.0 port etc." message. So I did. I removed the extension cable and connected it directly to one of the usb ports at the back. The first time it synchronized, it seemed fine. So I decided before I do anything with it, to update it to the 2.1 version. I made my account and bought (very bad policy there apple, it should be free or at least cheeper than 8 euro) the 2.1 update. I clicked to update the i-touch. While it was updating it crashed during the restore process (because it was disconnected but I didn't know that at the time). I unplugged it, resetted and plugged it back and managed to continue the restoring process until it was updated. After figuring out itunes I chose the "manage files manually option", kept everything unchecked in the sync options except the applications. I noticed there were random disconnections here and there but I didn't pay much attention because they weren't very frequent.
    The next day I plug in the touch again and suddenly I hear that annoying "connecting-disconnecting" sound from windows while my touch kept disappearing and reappearing in itunes. Suddenly my playlists disappeared from the touch. Nothing was in the touch any more. How could that happen since i had chosen to manage my files manually instead of synchronizing? So I unplugged the touch again, restarted the touch, restarted the pc, stopped and restarted the apple mobile service, unistalled and reinstalled itunes, searched microsoft support and read many usb troubleshooting documents in the web. Nothing happened. The touch randomly keeps disconnecting from the usb. I eventually managed to put my stuff back in and keep them there.
    Here's what I know:
    1) There is nothing wrong with my usb ports. I don't use usb hubs, they are usb 2.0, the voltage (500mA) is correct in the device manager. Everything else works fine there.
    2) The ipod touch does not support disk mode so you can't see it under "my computer" and this is not a problem.
    3)There is nothing wrong with the ipod, it works perfectly.
    4) This is not a usb cable physical problem.
    5) The five R's are irrelevant with this situation.
    Uninstalling and reinstalling itunes doesn't solve the problem, neither does hard resetting the ipod.
    6) Older PC configurations seem to be more affected by this but it doesn't have to do with unsupported specific chipsets.
    Here's what needs investigating:
    1) There may be a problem with the apple mobile service running on win XP.
    2) There may be a problem with the apple usb driver and win XP or older motherboards.
    3) There may be a 2.1 firmware issue with usb 2.0 connectivity.
    Workaround so you don't go nuts:
    Use USB 1.1 instead of 2.0. It is A LOT slower but it keeps the connection stable and you can work with the ipod. Just start copying and go do something else for the next hour. So far it works for me.
    This is a serious issue that needs immediate attention. I've stumbled across forum discussions dating to 2005 with this problem (with older ipods of course).

    I think this needs to be put down to the eternal PC/Mac argument. Apple dont want to fix this as they want everyone to buy a Mac. Its a business, understandable, but in turning away PC buyers they alienate a huge percentage of the market.
    Now, I had my first iTouch stolen. It synced, for the most part, very well, just occasionally it removed settings and music, but ticking boxes each time I sync'd sorted that, Its a workflow procedure.
    SO, now that my Touch has been replaced, iTunes cannot see it. The PC can identify it on USB1 or USB2, My work lap top can see it and has indeed upgraded it to V2 software, just in case that was the issue, but no. For some really weird reason Itunes on my desktop cannot see the new pod.
    This does not make sense with the argument that Apple software doesnt work on a PC, but doesnt help that none of the Apple support staff, phone or in-store have a clue about Windows operations.
    Because my Touch has now been trying to connect to 6 separate installs of itunes, multiple USB ports, multiple USB cables, a complete overhaul of the registry settings (everything else still works), and the loss of all my previous settings and backups from the last Touch... but still, the PC says its an ipod but cant install it, iTunes sits there, dumb.
    The only thing I can do now is sell the device as brand new as it has never had music on it and is just a week old...
    It has changed the MiniMac I was going to have for my new flat screen TV into a PC and suggests that anyone with a PC should stick to devices that run on PC, of which there are many, just without the user interface of the dear departed IPod Touch.
    Thanks

  • MacBook Pro Network Connectivity Problems

    Hi everyone!
    I am baffled with an issue connecting my MacBook Pro to the internet.  My wifi worked okay until about two or three months ago, when it stopped being able to automatically connect to networks.  I simply used my phone to pick up the IP/DNS information, and then entered it manually into network settings.  Then, last month, that solution stopped working, and I am unable to connect to any network via wifi or Ethernet, even when manually entering IP information.
    I have restarted my laptop and router multiple times.  Reset the PRAM.  Created a new location.  Deleted and added the network again.  Deleted network settings in Library.  Symptoms are not present on other wifi devices – other laptops and devices connect fine. 
    I am running OS X 10.8.
    Any help would be much appreciated!
    Thanks!

    If you're still on 10.8, then you need to update to 10.8.5 (which, itself, has some bugs) in order to rule out the bugs found in 10.8 through 10.8.4. Use the Combo updater -> http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1676.
    If, after updating, your connection problems persist, call back. There's no guarantee that updating is going to 'fix' your problem.
    Clinton

  • Recurring RFC connection problems

    Hi!
    I really need some help. We have been experiencing RFC problems for a few months now and our basis team have no clue as to what the problem might be. The problem is that on a daily basis we experience RFC connection problems. It usually happens at about 7am in the morning and lasts for an hour. After that the problem clears itself and for the rest of the day runs smoothly.
    We clearly see this problem on our RFC connection to the IBM MQ message server which handles all our incoming and outgoing IDOCS. This is however not the only RFC problem as we have also had RFC connection failures when switching between instances in SM51. This suggests to us that it is probably not a network issue, although the MQ server is housed in a different data center than the SAP servers.
    We are running ECC6 and our environment looks like this:
    4 hosts running 5 instances: 3 hosts with one instance and 1 host with 2 instances.
    While this problem is occurring you can do a connection test in SM59 to MQ which is usually successful. In SMGW we have picked up that it is trying to establish multiple connections to MQ, some connects successfully and some cannot connect. In ST11 in the RFC trace files the error message says that the MQ connection times out.
    While monitoring the MQ server we cannot pick up any problems. The MQ server itself seems to run without errors. The only problem is that it cannot connect to SAP to send IDOCS and SAP cannot connect to MQ. The load on the MQ server while this error occurs is minimal compared to the rest of the day.
    Does anyone have any ideas as to what the problem might be? Are there any other places other than the ones mentioned in this mail where we can check for errors?
    Thank you in advance!
    Iwan

    Hi Marcelo,
    In SM59, just select the RFC and above in same screen you can see the options
    RFC----- Display Trace (Shift + F8)
    Check the trace file and see if there is any connection problem between the two system.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Multiple SharePoint Connections Appearing

    Has anyone else encountered multiple SharePoint connections appearing for the same server in Office 2013.  We are using Office 365 and I work on office across multiple devices.  This anomaly seemed to pop up when I started using Office for iPad,
    though I've no idea if its connected.  I can remove the extra account and then all works fine, but on reboot the extra account reappears and then I can't open files from the web interface - most frustrating.

    Hi,
    It could be that the cache for the account was still being stored in the registry.
    I suggest you try the method below to delete the Office profile that may still be cached:
    Important
    Follow the steps in this section carefully. Serious problems might occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Before you modify it,
    back up the registry for restoration in
    case problems occur.
    From Registry Editor, browse to: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Common\Identity\Identities
    Choose the Office profile that you want to delete, and then choose Delete.
    From the Identity hive, navigate to the Profiles node, choose that same identity, open the shortcut menu (right-click), and then choose
    Delete.
    The steps above are quoted from this article below, you may also learn something useful from it:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj683102.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    Regards,
    Melon Chen
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here

  • AirPlay with AirServer connectivity problem

    Updated to IOS 7 and now I am having mirroring issues with AirServer. I have been using AirServer for approximately 6 weeks teaching in a 7th grade Math classroom. I connect and disconnect multiple times per class period and never had a problem until I updated my iPad to IOS 7 last week. Now, after 3 or 4 connect/disconnects, the next time I attempt to connect, it will not mirror the iPad. I have to hard reset the iPad to get it to work again. The iPad appears to be connected but everything on the iPad slows down considerably and AirPlay does not start on the computer. I reproduced the same exact problem on an iPad Mini that also has been updated to IOS 7. Also, I have the latest version of AirServer on the computer. I had absolutely no connectivity problems prior to upgrading to IOS 7. Thanks for any help you can provide.

    This is an iOS 7 AirPlay mirroring bug.
    Exact same results when using an Apple TV instead of AirServer.
    To make matters worse, the iPad automatically drops its mirroring session 45 seconds after it auto-locks.
    3-4 mirroring sessions is all it takes for the iPad mirroring to freeze up.
    After this happens, mirroring to an Apple TV only projects a blank screen.
    Once the mirroring is hung, the only way to fix it is to restart the iPad.
    Apple please fix this iOS 7 issue!

  • P965 Platinum/Realtek RTL8111 Connectivity Problems

    I have a P965 Platinum that has the on board Realtek RTL8111.  I have had it since Dec '06.  I have the latest Win Xp.  Driver 5.658.814.2006.  From the beginning I have had connectivity problems.  I have stripped the motherboard of all non-essential components and I have installed XP multiple times.
    Almost every time I boot up, and windows comes up, I get a Limited or No Connectivity error.  Notice I said 'almost' every time.  Sometimes I get connected right away.  I thought it might be a loose cord, and noticed that the left LED on the back of the LAN jack was blinking.  Which according to the manual means that it is talking.  I wiggled the cable around to see if it was a bad connection, nothing.  Then I replaced it and I connected.  Unfortunately when rebooted, it wasn't connected again.  After trial and error, I soon realized that by unplugging and re plugging the cable back in I could eventually get it to connect, which it eventually did every time.  Bad connection right?  Now here is the weird part, if I disable and enable the local area connection under Network Connections in windows enough times eventually it connects!  Here is exactly what I do:  First I disable it and then enable it again.  If it takes more than a couple of seconds trying to connect, I know it will fail.  So I keep doing it until it works.  I thought it was a BIOS or driver issue and being such a new board I thought I should just wait.  No other computer of mine has this problem.
    Thanks in advance for any help or advice.

    Quote from: Puffnstuff on 25-April-07, 10:09:14
    Have you tried using another cable to rule out the possibility that your cable is bad?
    Yes, I tried a new cable.  Same effect.  Now of my other computers have problems with the cable or connection.
    Quote from: HenryW on 25-April-07, 10:09:23
    Have you tried the updated Realtek drivers from MSI (5.664.0205.2007)? Dated 2007-04-20
                        HERE
    Yes, I tried those drivers which are also on the Realtek website.  The funny thing is that it connected the first time!  Unfortunately when I tried it again (reboot and restart) it did not connect.   So the driver upgrade did not fix the problem.

  • Timeouts and connection problems after 5.1(2) upgrade

    AIM/chat and some other programs are having timeout/connection problems after upgrade to 5.1(2). I am using S241 also. The connection problems stopped when the IPS was set to bypass. Rebuilt IPS and left sigs at default settings and problem is still happening. I am not seeing any of the IPs that are having the problem in the Event Viewer or on the Events in the IDM.
    Any known issues with the 5.1(2) that would cause this type of problem?

    I don't know specifically, but I did notice that 5.1(3) was released today.

Maybe you are looking for