Classic scenario - goods receipt in SRM
Hi,
I've seen on a business scenario document of SAP that even in the classic scenario it's possible to execute goods receipt by the requester in SRM. My question is: if in classic scenario the purchase order is created on R/3, how can the requester create goods a receipt in SRM for a specific PO? Does SRM get data (items, supplier, etc.) from a R/3 PO in the creation of a goods receipt document?
Regards,
Cristiano Soares
HI SRM GURU
We are implementing SRM 4.0 and follow a classic scenarios.
While creating a shoping cart the approval of Shopping cart is based on various attributes like
Material Group + Cost Center + Value .
Can I change the standard workflow conditions and add new conditions like material Group and cost centers.
So that when I create a Shopping cart and change the cost center in the shopping cart, it goes to the head of the new cost center(for Approval) which is manually entered in the shopping cart.
Can this control be achived through the Org plan attributes.
Regards,
Nimish Sheth
Similar Messages
-
Hello SRM Gurus,
I understand that GR can be done in either SRM or R3. We use the classic scenario so I know that my GR will get posted in R3. My questions are:
1. Are there any advantages to creating GR in SRM vs. in R3?
2. How do I specify whether GR is to be performed in SRM or R3?
Regards,
HPHi HP,
like Yann mentioned, there are no specific settings needed.
The decision, where the GR is done is process driven and depends on your
definition and your business. Based on that design, user get the roles in SRM
and/or R/3 to perform their tasks. For typical indirect procurement, the GR is done
by the requisitioner or much easier, automatically in combination of ERS
procedure.
Cheers,
Claudia -
BADI's in classic scenario after upgrading to SRM 07
Hello,
We are using the classic scenario, just finished upgrading the SRM 4.0 (server 5) to SRM 07.
We are using ECC 6.0.
We used the BADI's:
BBP_CREAT_PO_BACK
BBP_CREAT_RQ_BACK
I have understood that in SRM 7.0 the BADI's that I have to use are:
BBP_CREAT_BE_PO_NEW
BBP_CREAT_BE_RQ_NEW
Do I have to work with the new BADI's or can I stay with the old one?
Thank's
YaronHello,
As far as I know, once you activate new badis, old ones will not be called anymore.
So, if you do not activate them, old badis will still be called.
Just remember that these badis are valid when follow on document is created via RFC in ECC.
If you have activated ESOA (creating POs in ECC via XML), PO badi is not valid anymore.
Regards,
Ricardo -
Cannot perform Goods Receipt in SRM
Hi All:
When I'm trying to perform GR/ Confirmations in SRM I get the following message. "No documents correspond to search criteria or no authorization" .
I have tried the following roles BBP_STAL_EMPLOYEE and BBP_MULTI_EMPLOYEE to no avail.
I see the PO's and the icon to do the GR but to no avail.
I have also tried clearing the cache from the browsers.
Our environment is ECC 6.0 SRM 5.0 server 5.5 , Classic scenario. The backend systems seem to be defined correctly and the jobs CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2 are running successfully. I do not know what else is the problem. I have enabled the confirmation work flow, and defined the intervals for the confirmation numbers.
What else could be the problem? This problem occurs for both normal receiving and central receiving.
Thanks for your help
AlexHi Alex,
sorry for the confusion, I didn´t read the issue properly....
As mentioned before you need to distinguish between CF02 und CF03. CF02 does not read the backend PO data, so if you are in classic scenario only the reference document (SC) is read and there (for example) the flag GR_IND is not stored. This might be one reason why the PO appears in SRM, but when trying to post the PO the error message is raised, as then the backend data is read.
But the issue is pretty complex, so maybe you should try to debug and check what is going on excately, or you can provide some additional data
Michael -
Goods Receipting a SRM PO that is awaiting Approval?
Hiya.
I have a issue that is causing many problems. Please, has anybody seen this before in SRM 5?
Basically, the user creates a SRM PO from a Cart for the value of $100 and this needs no approval. If they then increase the PO value to $1000, the PO is then correctly required for approval with SRM workflow. When the PO is saved, it has a status 'AWAITING APPROVALS'.
Then why does SRM still allow the PO to be subject to a goods receipt confirmation with the old value of $100 even eventhough it is awaiting approval if $1000?
warmest thanks,
Pooja.Hi,
The problem is once the PO has been changed, it creates a new change version. This change version is still not active until approval happens. Till this time the old version is taken as active version by the system and it can be considered for confirmation. If you want to prevent confirmation creation during this period, then you can create an error message using doc_check badi to say some thing like 'Change PO is awaiting approval, No confirmation possible.'
Regards,
Sanjeev -
Hello all,
It is possible to create a good receipt in a system EBP if a delivery date in a purchase order is great than
for a date to be creating good receipt ?
The date of the purchase order has been depend for creating good receipt ?
What is find in EBP system a customizing good receipt ?
Thanks for your helpHi
I have tested one cycle and it is possible to do a GR prior to the delivery date mentioned in the PO.
In EBP we can do a Goods receipts prior to the delivery date mentioned in the purchase Orders.
Regards,
Nimish Sheth
NB Do reqards points for helpful anwsers. -
IDOC problem during goods confirmation in SRM
Hi guys,
I am facing some problem during goods confirmation in SRM.I am getting an error relate to IDOCs.i have setup the desired message and partner ID for goods confirmation in SRm but the IDOC gets stuck with the code 30 and the idicator is yellow.But when i manually reproces trhe IDOC after that it works fine.I dont want to process it manually.Can anyone help me out with the possible source of problem.
Regards,
Pawan.Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
<b>Please see related links -></b>
Note 549846 - FAQ: Goods receipt confirmation EBP
Note 847250 - IDoc error remains in alert monitor although IDoc is ok
<u>Othere related OSS Notes -></u>
Note 1049536 Incorrect reference doc year when deleting goods receipt
Note 683848 Problems with delivery note number with upper/lower case
Note 747422 Replace internal units with ISO codes - modification
Note 545657 Error in ERS procedure in back end: Delivery note missing
Note 338985 BBPCF & IV: incorrect IDocs in backend system
Note 561881 Posting of returns for partial confirmation not possible
Note 550884 Check of return delivery and reversal against back end
Note 514669 Goods receipt cannot be posted
Note 502869 Return delivery possible despite posted return delivery
Note 430153 Classic scenario: Goods receipt/issue slip, bill of lading
Note 360833 "Purchase order & is being processed", IDoc error
Note 388601 Follow-up processing for GR/SE confirmation is not possible
<u>Do let me know.</u>
Regards
- Atul -
Hello!
A customer has classic scenario and creates shopping carts using only cost center as account assignments in SRM.
When the PO is created in ERP's backend, sometimes a purchaser changes the account assignment to Asset("A").
The account assignment changed in ERP is not reflecting in the shopping cart and the result is that the requester can not make a goods receipt in SRM because the account assignment does not match the PO.
Does anybody knows what shall be done so the account assignment in SRM is updated according to ERP?
Shall I use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
KarinHi Karin,
As Mithun rightly said, the changes made to the PO will not be reflected in the SC not just in Classic but in Extended Classic Scenario as well.
We create a Confirmation against a PO and not against SC, so it is not necessary that the SC needs to be updated.
Is the system allowing the creation of the Confirmation or is the error coming up when the confirmation is being posted on the backend system?
Can you check the SLG1 in SRM for the error that it is triggering when the PO is changed?
Regards -
Posting Goods Receipt Data in SRM
Hi,
We are implementing SRM 4(Extended Classic Scenario). For all open Purchase Orders (PO's) in R/3 we will be getting goods receipt data from R/3 in an excel sheet.
Now how de we upload (create/post) the Goods Receipt data into SRM?
Are there any BAPI's or function modules that I can use in the program that I am developing to create/post goods receipt in SRM from the data in the excel sheet?
Thanks and Regards,
MickThanks Christophe.
I am not sure I have understood why we need to use BBP_CF_ASSIGNMENT. Is it that it will give the item quantities that have already been confirmed? And what is the balance quantity to be received? But if that is the case how does it help us as the excel sheet will contain the quantity for which the confirmation has to be created in SRM.
Apart from the FM's that you mentioned (BBP_PD_CONF_CREATE, BBP_PD_CONF_UPDATE and BBP_PD_CONF_SAVE), I came across this bapi, BBP_BAPI_CONF_CREATE_IN. Will this not create the confirmations in SRM? Please let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
Mick -
Contract Creation in SRM 7.0 classic scenario
Hi All,
We are using SRM 7.0 Classic scenario with ECC 6.0 EHP 4 and CLM 2. We are creating contracts in SAP CLM and pushing into as Global outline agreement.
Question is -
1) Can we create contracts in SRM 7.0 Classic scenario ?
2) Instead of transfering the ECC outline agreement to SRM , can we directly use ECC outline agreement as a source of supply in SRM while creating a SC.
3) How we can transfer the SAP CLM 2.0 contracts into SRM 7.0 and use a source of supply there while creating a SC ( Considereing that these CLM contratcs are also transfered to ECC as a outline agreement)
What are the mandatory fields required to transfer the CLM contracts contracts to ECC outline agreement - I know ,Vendor, Purchase org, Pur grp, company code are required - is product catagory is also a mandatory field.
Rgds/PawanHi Pawan,
Please find the answered for your questions:
Question is -
1) Can we create contracts in SRM 7.0 Classic scenario ?
Mitesh: Yes we can very well create in Classic Scenario as well in SRM 7.0.SC can be pushed to SOCO based on the Prod Category configuration in SPRO.From SOCO PO, Contract and RFX can be created for SC.
2) Instead of transfering the ECC outline agreement to SRM , can we directly use ECC outline agreement as a source of supply in SRM while creating a SC.
Mitesh: I dont think we can use ECC outline agreement as source of supply in SRM while creating SC.Contract replication in SRM 7.0 with EHP 4 ECC is eSOA based and ONLY Outbound to SRM (inbound to ECC).Contract cannot be replicated from ECC to SRM.
3) How we can transfer the SAP CLM 2.0 contracts into SRM 7.0 and use a source of supply there while creating a SC ( Considereing that these CLM contratcs are also transfered to ECC as a outline agreement)
+Mitesh: Standard intergeration of CLM/ESO to SRM 7.0 is very much there in roadmap for future releases of SRM/ESO.+
+As of now there is a consulting solution available to integerate ECC and ESO/CLM.+
+This logic can be leveraged to integrate ESO/CLM to SMR 7.0 (or lower version) requiring Developement effort from SRM functional,SRM technical,PI, Basis,ESO and java consultants.+
+Such contracts can be forced to be used as Source of Supply or alternatively replicated to ECC Via standard repliation scenario.+
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Mitesh -
Net Value in ECC differ from SRM Value in Goods Receipt
Hi All,
We are creating Goods Receipt in SRM.When we create Goods Receipt in SRM Goods Receipt shows correct value, where as in ECC it shows Wrong.
Ex: In SRM Goods Receipt value is '1000', where as in ECC it is '1' instead of '1000'. Could any body tell me what would be the reason.
and
could anybody explain me, How SRM replicates the Goods Recipts data to ECC Goods Receipt automatically..means is there any BADI/IDOC etc...what is the exact procedure...
Thanks in Advance...Hi,
SRM replicates the GR data to ECC through ALE/IDOC concept
Check in BD64 Distribution model will be created with message type MBGMCR for GR postiong
check in WE02 ( idoc display) inbound idcos in SRM and in ECC for outbound idocs for message type MBGMCR and also check the data records for that perticular GR.
Thanks
prasad s -
Hello
I understand the difference between Extended Classic and Classic Scenario with the follow on document creation. But, I need to understand the business benifits of implementing Extended Classic Scenario as opposed to Classic Scenario in SRM. In what business scenario do one suggest Extended Classic.
Appreciate every answer
Thanks
VijayHi Vijay,
The most important thing to consider when choosing the implementation scenario is to consider which system will support the different steps of the procurement process.
In case of the classic scenario, after creation of the request (shopping cart) in SRM, the remaining process steps will be handled / supported in the back-end system (ECC). Goods receipt can be executed in both systems. This would be a good choice if the organization has already an operational back-end system and the users from the purchasing department are already familiar (and happy) with all the MM functionality. SRM will only function as a support tool for administrating the purchasing needs of the end-users in the organization.
In case of the extended-classic implementation scenario the complete purchasing process will be supported in the SRM system (most organizations prefer to use the back-end system for invoice verification). Thus requesters, purchasers, goods recipients etc. all will use the SRM system to support their respective activities. This would be the preferred scenario in case both MM (ECC) and SRM are new to the organisation and will be implemented together.
SRM offers the different users a nicer user interface as opposed to the R/3 screens. Also the (strategic) sourcing capabilities of SRM can only be used when implementing the extended classic scenario. Same for the Suplier Enablement business scenariou2019s. Most are only supported when extended classic is active.
So depending on the intentions of the organization a choice can be made. SRM only as a tool for administrating the decentralized request from the end users in the organization: Classic scenario will suffice. SRM as a tool to support the complete purchasing process, from sourcing till evaluation - Extended classic will be the correct choice.
Regards,
Skander -
Central Receiver role in Classic Scenario
Hi All
We have a requirement for a user who can enter goods receipt in SRM on behalf of other users.
We tried to set up the central receiver role provided by SAP , however encountered some issues:
1) In the POWL for the central receiver, only the PO's created locally are visible. So none of the Classic PO's in ECC could
be seen
2) When in the" Create Confirmation" screen, I manually searched for a PO, It allowed me to proceed One screen, however I couldn't enter a confirmation as I got an auth error:
Partner xxxxx not found with partner function type xxxx.
I thought the central receiver was entitled to confirm all PO's without question.
Kindly advise
Thanks
KedarHi Ranjan
The only tab I have is Central confirmation & worklist.
I didn't modify the role , but just using the standard portal & SRM role offered by SAP for Central receiver.
Inside central conf, I have the 2 problems I mentioned.
I cannot find backend PO's & secondly when I try to confirm other person's PO/shopping cart I get the partner function error.
Is central confirmation from SRM , even supported in classic scenario?
Thanks
Kedar -
Consignment process in Classic scenario
HI Experts,
can anyone let me know whether we can use consignment process in classic scenario.
we are having SRM 5.0
If it is possible kindly let me know what needs to be done in SRM to set up the same
regards
subbuHi Subbhu
Azad is correct.
but you can see this thread but doing enhancement you might achieved .but before comitting to customer you have to do lot of business analysis /business impactsand etc.
See Yorum thread. you must get an idea.
STO classic scenario SRM 4.0
BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW badi helps
you need to change the item category /document type must have consignment
Consignment is items procured on a consignment basis.
Material number is necessary
Account assignments cannot be made for material ordered on consignment.
Goods Receipt is necessary
Invoice receipt not necessary
Consignment stocks are managed separately and are not valuated
br
muthu -
SUS POs update with Goods Receipts and Invoices Information
Hi SRM Experts,
We have a SRM - SUS - R/3 landscape.
1. We create POs in SRM (extended classic scenario) and transfer them to R/3 (via RFC) and to SUS (via XI Interfaces PurchaseOrderRequest_Out and PurchaseOrderChangeRequest_Out).
2. We post Goods Receipts into SRM (or alternatively into R/3).
3. We post Invoices into R/3.
Is it possible to update SUS POs with Goods Receipts and Invoices Information?
If yes, what do we have to do to update this information into SUS POs?
Thank you very much and kind regards,
Marco.Hi Marco,
you want to update SUS POs with GR / IV data?
In a SUS environment each document counts as an own document and needs to
be customized. I am not sure about understanding your requirement.
Using the SUS-MM scenario in a classic environment enables the exchange of
documents for PO / GR / IV in a "ping-pong" mode. SUS always needs a document,
on which the next action can be based on.
Thanks,
Claudia
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem with smartform interface
Hi guys, I want to put a strucuture in my import and tables in smartform interface using my own type,,, but it gives me an error that the type is not pre-defined... whta should I do? I have this type: TYPES: BEGIN OF t_likp, vbeln LIKE likp-
-
_Microsoft Baseline Security Advisor_ : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/cc184923.aspx Used by many leading third party security vendors and security auditors, MBSA on average scans over 3 million computers each week. Join the thousands of
-
Problem in qty after printing of PO
Hi Gurus, I'm creating a PO with discount for example i use HB01 (header discount) the original PO qty is 10 pcs after saving and printing of PO the PO qty only show 1 pc only, can u tell me why these happen? can you suggest a solution to fixed these
-
Creating a restricted variable
Hi, I have a Version characteristic that has the following values assigned to it: 100 B00 H01 F00 F01 F02 F03 FL1 T00 I would like to create a variable that will be restricted to selection values F00 - F03 only. Can anyone point me in the right direc
-
should i prepare base on 12 c contents or stick to 11g only. i don't want to answer incorrect answer. please advise...